Live action movies (such asA Fistful of Dollars) use photography to depict settings and characters as they appear in life. In this example,Clint Eastwood andMarianne Koch appear in a real-world location.
As the normal process of making visual media involves live action, the term itself is usually superfluous. However, it makes an important distinction in situations in which one might normally expect animation, such as when the work is adapted from avideo game, or from ananimated cartoon.[citation needed]
As use ofcomputer-generated imagery (CGI) in films has become a major trend, some critics, such as Mark Langer, have discussed the relationship between live action and animation. New films that use computer-generatedspecial effects can not be compared to live-action films usingcartoon characters because of the perceived realism of both styles combined.[5]
In producing a movie, both live action andanimation have their own pros and cons. Unlike animation, live action involves the photography of actors and actresses, as well as sets and props making the movie seem personal and as close to reality as possible. The only drawback is one's budget. On the other hand, animation works well in conveyingabstract ideas but it generally takes much longer to produce.[6]