This is alist of the most massive stars that have been discovered, insolar mass units (M☉).
Most of the masses listed below are contested and, being the subject of current research, remain under review and subject to constant revision of their masses and other characteristics. Indeed, many of the masses listed in the table below are inferred from theory, using difficult measurements of thestars'temperatures,composition, andabsolute brightnesses. All the masses listed below are uncertain: Both the theory and the measurements are pushing the limits of current knowledge and technology. Both theories and measurements could be incorrect.

Since massive stars are rare,astronomers must look very far fromEarth to find them. All the listed stars are many thousands of light years away making their light especially faint, which makes measurements difficult. In addition to being far away, many stars of such extreme mass are surrounded by clouds of outflowing gas created by extremely powerfulstellar winds; the surrounding gas interferes with the already difficult-to-obtain measurements of stellar temperatures and brightnesses, which greatly complicates the issue of estimating internal chemical compositions and structures.[a]This obscuration leads to difficulties in determining the parameters needed to calculate the star's mass.

Both the obscuring clouds and the great distances also make it difficult to judge whether the star is just a single supermassive object or, instead, amultiple star system. A number of the "stars" listed below may actually be two or more companions orbiting too closely for our telescopes to distinguish, each star possibly being massive in itself but not necessarily "supermassive" to either be on this list, or near the top of it.And certainly other combinations are possible – for example a supermassive star with one or more smaller companions or more than one giant star – but without being able to clearly see inside the surrounding cloud, it is difficult to know what kind of object is actually generating the bright point of light seen from the Earth.
More globally, statistics on stellar populations seem to indicate that the upper mass limit is in the 120-solar-mass range,[1] so any mass estimate above this range is suspect.
Eclipsing binary stars are the only stars whose masses are estimated with some confidence. However, note that almost all of the masses listed in the table below were inferred by indirect methods; only a few of the masses in the table were determined using eclipsing systems.
Amongst the most reliable listed masses are those for the eclipsing binariesNGC 3603-A1,WR 21a, andWR 20a. Masses for all three were obtained from orbital measurements.[b] This involves measuring theirradial velocities and also their light curves. The radial velocities only yield minimum values for the masses, depending on inclination, but light curves of eclipsing binaries provide the missing information: inclination of the orbit to our line of sight.
Some stars may once have been more massive than they are today. Many large stars have likely suffered significant mass loss – perhaps as much as several tens of solar masses. The lost mass is expected to have been expelled bysuperwinds: high velocity winds that are driven by the hotphotosphere into interstellar space. The process forms an enlarged extended envelope around the star that interacts with the nearby interstellar medium and infuses the adjacent volume of space with elements heavier than hydrogen or helium.[c]
There are also – or ratherwere – stars that might have appeared on the list but no longer exist as stars, or aresupernova impostors; today we see only their debris.[d] The masses of the precursor stars that fueled these destructive events can be estimated from the type of explosion and the energy released, but those masses arenot listed here.
This listonly concerns "living" stars – those which are still seen by Earth-based observers existing as active stars: Still engaged in interiornuclear fusion that generates heat and light. That is, the light now arriving at the Earth as images of the stars listed still shows them to internally generatenew energy as of the time (in the distant past) that light now being received was emitted. The list specifically excludes bothwhite dwarfs – former stars that are now seen to be "dead" but radiating residual heat – andblack holes – fragmentary remains of exploded stars which havegravitationally collapsed, even though accretion disks surrounding those black holes might generate heat or lightexterior to the star's remains (now inside the black hole), radiated by infalling matter (see§ Black holes below).
There are two related theoretical limits on how massive a star can possibly be: Theaccretion mass limit and theEddington mass limit.
Astronomers have long hypothesized that as aprotostar grows to a size beyond120M☉, something drastic must happen.[2] Although the limit can be stretched for very earlyPopulation III stars, and although the exact value is uncertain, if any stars still exist above150~200M☉ they would challenge current theories ofstellar evolution.
Studying theArches Cluster, which is currently the densest known cluster of stars inour galaxy, astronomers have confirmed that no stars in that cluster exceed about150M☉.

Rare ultramassive stars that exceed this limit – for example in theR136 star cluster – might be explained by an exceptional event hypothesized to have occurred: some of the pairs of massivestars in close orbit in young, unstablemultiple-star systems must, on rare occasions, collide and merge when certain unusual circumstances hold that make a collision possible.[3]
Eddington's limit on stellar mass arises because of light-pressure: For a sufficiently massive star the outward pressure ofradiant energy generated bynuclear fusion in the star's core exceeds the inward pull of its own gravity. The lowest mass for which this effect is active is theEddington limit.
Stars of greater mass have a higher rate of core energy generation, and heavier stars' luminosities increase far out of proportion to the increase in their masses. TheEddington limit is the point beyond which a star ought to push itself apart, or at least shed enough mass to reduce its internal energy generation to a lower, sustainable rate. The actual limit-point mass depends on how opaque the gas in the star is, and metal-richPopulation I stars have lower mass limits than metal-poorPopulation II stars. Before their demise, the hypothetical metal-freePopulation III stars would have had the highest allowed mass, somewhere around300M☉.
In theory, a more massive star could not hold itself together because of the mass loss resulting from the outflow of stellar material. In practice the theoreticalEddington Limit must be modified for high luminosity stars and the empiricalHumphreys–Davidson limit is used instead.[4]
| Wolf–Rayet star |
|---|
| Slash star |
| O-type star |
| B-type star orLBV |
The following two lists show a few of the known stars, including the stars inopen clusters,OB associations, andH II regions. Despite their high luminosity, many of them are nevertheless too distant to be observed with the naked eye. Stars that are at least sometimes visible to the unaided eye have theirapparent magnitude (6.5 or brighter) highlighted with a sky blue background.
The first list gives stars that are estimated to be60M☉ or larger; the majority of which are shown. The second list includes some notable stars which are below60M☉ for the purpose of comparison. The method used to determine each star's mass is included to give an idea of the data's uncertainty; note that the mass of binary stars can be determined far more accurately. The masses listed below are the stars' current (evolved) mass, not their initial (formation) mass.
| Name | Location | M (M☉) | L (L☉) | Teff (K) | Spectral type | Dist. (ly) | mV | Mass estimated by | Link | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R136a1 | R136 | 291±46 | 7,244,000+699,000 −1,078,000 | 46,000+1,250 −2,375 | WN5h | 163,000 | 12.28±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [5][6][7][8] |
| BAT99-98 | NGC 2070 | 226 | 5,012,000 | 45,000 | WN6 | 165,000 | 13.5 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [9][10] |
| R136a2 | R136 | 195±35 | 5,129,000+367,000 −342,000 | 47,000+1,000 −625 | WN5h | 163,000 | 12.80±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [5][6][7][8] |
| Melnick 42 | R136 | 189 | 3,631,000 | 47,300 | O2If* | 163,000 | 12.86 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][10] |
| R136a3 | R136 | 184±40 | 5,012,000+236,000 −226,000 | 50,000+2,500 −8,000 | WN5h | 163,000 | 12.97±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [5][6][7][8] |
| W51-57 | W51 | 160 | 1,820,000–4,786,000 | 42,700 | O4V | 20,000 | evolution | [12] | ||
| HD 15558 A | IC 1805 | ≥152±51 | 661,000 | O5.5III(f) | 24,400 | 7.87 combined | binary | SIMBAD | [13][14] | |
| W51-3 | W51 | 148+105 −82 | 1,348,000+626,000 −437,000–3,890,000+4,238,000 −2,028,000 | 39,800 | O3V–O8V | 20,000 | evolution | SIMBAD | [12] | |
| Melnick 34 A | R136 | 147±22 | 2,692,000+544,000 −453,000 | 53,000±1,200 | WN5h | 163,000 | 13.10 combined | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [15][10] |
| VFTS 1022 | R136 | 142.8+25.6 −25.2 | 3,020,000+782,000 −621,000 | 42,200 | O3.5If*/WN7 | 164,000 | 13.44 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16] |
| R136c | R136 | 142.0+32.7 −24.7 | 3,802,000+1,568,000 −1,110,000 | 42,170±1,890 | WN5h | 163,000 | 12.86 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16][10][e] |
| LH 10-3209 A | NGC 1763 | 140 | 2,312,000 | 50,900 | O3III(f*) | 160,000 | 11.859±0.1751 combined | evolution | SIMBAD | [17][18][19][e] |
| VFTS 682 | Runaway fromR136 | 137.8+27.5 −15.9 | 3,236,000+838,000 −666,000 | 54,450±1,960 | WN5h | 164,000 | 16.08 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16] |
| VFTS 506 | NGC 2070 | 136.8±24.2 | 2,692,000 | 55,000 | ON2V((n))((f*)) | 164,000 | 13.31 | evolution | SIMBAD | [20] |
| Melnick 34 B | R136 | 136±20 | 2,344,000+474,000 −394,000 | 53,000±1,200 | WN5h | 163,000 | 13.10 combined | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [15][10] |
| W51d | W51 | 135 | 1,288,000–2,884,000 | 42,700 | O3V–O4V | 20,000 | evolution | [12] | ||
| NGC 3603-B | HD 97950 | 132±13 | 2,884,000+504,000 −429,000 | 42,000±2,000 | WN6h | 24,800 | 11.33 | evolution | SIMBAD | [21][22] |
| HD 269810 | NGC 2029 | 130 | 2,188,000 | 52,500 | O2III(f*) | 163,000 | 12.22 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [23][24] |
| R136a7 | R136 | 127+15 −16 | 2,291,000+280,000 −341,000 | 54,000+2,000 −3,000 | O3III(f*) | 163,000 | 13.97±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][10][8] |
| WR 42e | Runaway fromHD 97950 | 123 | 3,200,000 | 43,700 | O3If*/WN6 | 25,000 | 14.529 | ejection | SIMBAD | [25][f] |
| Sk -69° 249 A | NGC 2074 | 119 | 4,130,000 | 38,900 | O7If | 160,000 | 12.02±0.21 combined | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][27] |
| Sk -69° 212 | NGC 2044 | 119 | 2,377,000 | 45,400 | O5III(f) | 160,000 | 12.416±0.0600 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][18] |
| ST5-31 | NGC 2074 | 119 | 2,168,000 | 50,700 | O3If* | 160,000 | 12.273±0.084 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][28] |
| R136a5 | R136 | 116+6 −5 | 2,089,000+149,000 −139,000 | 48,000±750 | O2I(n)f* | 157,000 | 13.71±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][10][8] |
| MSP 183 | Wd2 | 115 | 724,000 | 49,000±3,000 | O3V((f)) | 20,000 | 13.878±0.017 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [29][30] |
| WR 24 | Collinder 228 | 114 | 2,951,000 | 50,100 | WN6ha-w | 14,000 | 6.48 | evolution | SIMBAD | [31][32] |
| NGC 3603-C1 | HD 97950 | 113+11 −8 | 2,239,000+392,000 −333,000 | 44,000±2,000 | WN6h | 24,800 | 11.89 combined | evolution | SIMBAD | [21][22][e] |
| Arches-F9 | Arches Cluster | 111.3 | 2,239,000 | 36,800 | WN8-9 | 25,000 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [33][34] | |
| VFTS 545 | R136 | 110.4+18.9 −16.6 | 1,995,000+516,000 −410,000 | 47,320±1,700 | O2If*/WN5 | 164,000 | 13.40 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16][10] |
| HSH95-36 | R136 | 110±5 | 1,862,000+133,000 −124,000 | 49,500+750 −1,000 | O2If* | 163,000 | 14.41±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][10][8] |
| Cygnus OB2 #12 A | Cygnus OB2 | 110 | 1,660,000 | 13,700 | B3–4Ia+ | 5,200 | 11.702 combined | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [35][36][e] |
| Melnick 39 A | R136 | 109±7 | 1,585,000+654,000 −463,000 | 44,000±2,500 | O3If*/WN6-A | 160,000 | 13.0 combined | binary | SIMBAD | [37] |
| R136a4 | R136 | 108+6 −7 | 1,905,000+90,000 −207,000 | 50,000+500 −2,000 | O3V((f*))(n) | 157,000 | 13.96±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][10][8] |
| VFTS 621 | NGC 2070 | 107 | 1,380,000 | 50,100 | O2V((f*))z | 164,000 | 15.39 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][10] |
| R136a6 | R136 | 105+8 −10 | 1,738,000+124,000 −116,000 | 48,000±750 | O2I(n)f*p | 157,000 | 13.35±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][10][8] |
| W49-3 | W49 | 105±20 | 1,514,000+528,000 −392,000 | 40,700+5,000 −4,400 | O3–O7V | 36,200 | evolution | SIMBAD | [38][39] | |
| R99 | N44 | 103 | 3,162,000 | 28,000 | Ofpe/WN9 | 164,000 | 11.520±0.049 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [9][14] |
| Arches-F6 | Arches Cluster | 101.0 | 2,239,000 | 34,700 | WN8-9 | 25,000 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [33][34] | |
| Arches-F1 | Arches Cluster | 100.9 | 1,995,000 | 33,700 | WN8-9 | 25,000 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [33][34] | |
| Peony Star | Peony Nebula | 100 | 2,951,000+1,217,000 −862,000 | 25,100 | WN10 | 26,000 | evolution | SIMBAD | [40][39] | |
| HD 93129 Aa | Trumpler 14 | 100+25 −60 | 1,413,000+172,000 −154,000 | 52,000±3,000 | O2If* | 7,500 | 7.310±0.011 combined | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [41][14] |
| Mc30-1 A | Mercer 30 | 99 | 3,236,000 | 32,200 | O6–7.5If+ | 40,000 | evolution | SIMBAD | [42][g][e] | |
| VFTS 1028 | R136 | 99 | 1,230,000 | 47,300 | O3III(f*) or O4–5V | 164,000 | 13.82 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11] |
| WR 25 A | Trumpler 16 | 98 | 2,399,000 | 50,100 | WN6h-w | 6,500 | 8.80 combined | evolution | SIMBAD | [31][14][e] |
| BI 253 | Runaway fromR136 | 97.6+22.2 −23.1 | 1,175,000+410,000 −304,000 | 54,000±1,500 | O2V-III(n)((f*)) | 164,000 | 13.669±0.062 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16][43] |
| R136a8 | R136 | 96±6 | 1,479,000+106,000 −99,000 | 49,500±1,250 | O2–3V | 157,000 | 14.42±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][8] |
| HM 1-6 | HM 1 | 95 | 1,500,000 | 44,800 | O5If | 11,000 | 11.64 | evolution | SIMBAD | [44][45] |
| NGC 3603-42 | HD 97950 | 95 | 946,000 | 46,500 | O3III(f*) | 25,000 | 12.86 | evolution | SIMBAD | [17][22] |
| ST2-22 | NGC 2044 | 94 | 1,247,000 | 51,300 | O3V((f)) | 160,000 | 14.3 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][46] |
| VFTS 562 | NGC 2070 | 94 | 1,122,000 | 42,200 | O4V | 164,000 | 13.66 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][10] |
| NGC 3603-A1a | HD 97950 | 93.3±11.0 | 1,000,000 | 37,000 | O3If*/WN6 | 24,800 | 11.18 combined | eclipsing binary | SIMBAD | [47][21][22] |
| WR 21a A | Runaway fromWd2 | 93.2+2.2 −1.9 | 1,514,000+224,000 −195,000 | 42,000 | O2.5If*/WN6ha | 26,100 | 12.661±0.03combined | eclipsing binary | SIMBAD | [48][24] |
| HD 303308 | Trumpler 16 | 93 | 1,138,000 | 51,300 | O3V | 9,200 | 8.17 | evolution | SIMBAD | [44][24] |
| VFTS 512 | NGC 2070 | 93 | 1,096,000 | 47,300 | O2V-III((f*)) | 164,000 | 14.28 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][10] |
| R136b | R136 | 92±5 | 2,239,000+160,000 −149,000 | 35,500±750 | O4If | 163,000 | 13.24±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][10][8] |
| VFTS 16 | Runaway fromR136 | 91.6+11.5 −10.5 | 1,318,000+341,000 −271,000 | 50,600+500 −590 | O2III-If* | 164,000 | 13.546±0.010 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16][10] |
| NGC 346-W1 | NGC 346 | 91 | 1,500,000 | 43,400 | O5.5If | 200,000 | 12.57 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][49] |
| NGC 3603-A3 | HD 97950 | 91 | 863,000 | 46,400 | O3III(f*) | 24,800 | 12.95 | evolution | SIMBAD | [17][22] |
| W49-2 | W49 | 90–240,250±120 | 4,365,000+3,397,000 −1,910,000 | 35,500+1,700 −1,600 | O4If–O5.5If | 36,200 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [38][39] | |
| η Carinae A | Trumpler 16 | 90 | 4,000,000 | 9,470 (near the top of the wind) | LBV | 7,500 | 6.48±0.01 combined | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [50][51] |
| R146 | Runaway fromR136 | 88.4+16.9 −15.8 | 1,950,000+505,000 −401,000 | 53,090±1,910 | WN5ha | 164,000 | 13.116±0.0201 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16][10] |
| WR 89 | HM 1 | 87 | 2,138,000 | 39,800 | WN8h | 11,000 | 11.02±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [31][24] |
| VFTS 599 | NGC 2070 | 87 | 977,000 | 44,700 | O3III(f*) | 164,000 | 13.80 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][10] |
| Arches-F7 | Arches Cluster | 86.3 | 1,995,000 | 33,700 | WN8-9 | 25,000 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [33][34] | |
| R147 | Runaway fromR136 | 85.6+15.2 −16.6 | 2,291,000+593,000 −471,000 | 47,320±1,700 | WN5h | 164,000 | 12.993±0.042 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16][52] |
| Sk 80 | NGC 346 | 85 | 1,500,000 | 38,900 | O7If | 200,000 | 12.31 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][53] |
| BAT99-92 B | Tarantula Nebula | 85 | 1,175,000 | 23,000 | B1Ia | 165,000 | 11.39±0.02combined | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [54] |
| Sk -70° 91 | BSDL 1830 | 84.09 | 851,000 | 48,849 | ON2III | 165,000 | 12.78 | evolution | SIMBAD | [55][18][h] |
| Sk -66° 172 | N64 | 84.09 | 851,000 | 48,849 | O2III(f*) | 160,000 | 13.1 | evolution | SIMBAD | [55][18][i] |
| Sk -68° 137 | Runaway fromR136 | 84.09 | 851,000 | 48,849 | O2III(f*) | 160,000 | 13.346±0.0101 | evolution | SIMBAD | [55][18] |
| LH 64-16 | NGC 2001 | 84.09 | 851,000 | 48849 | ON2III(f*) | 160,000 | 13.666±0.010 | evolution | SIMBAD | [55][28] |
| Melnick 33Na A | R136 | 83±19 | 1,413,000+725,000 −479,000 | 50,000±2,500 | OC2.5If* | 163,000 | 13.79 combined | evolution | SIMBAD | [56][57] |
| Melnick 39 B | R136 | 83±5 | 1,000,000+413,000 −292,000 | 48,000±2,500 | O3If*/WN6-A | 160,000 | 13.0 combined | binary | SIMBAD | [37] |
| WR 20a A | Wd2 | 82.7±5.5 | 1,150,000±150,000 | 43,000±2,000 | WN6ha | 20,000 | 13.5 combined | eclipsing binary | SIMBAD | [58] |
| Arches-F2 A | Arches Cluster | 82±12 | 1,862,000+227,000 −203,000 | 34,100+2,000 −1,000 | WN8–9h | 25,000 | eclipsing binary | SIMBAD | [59] | |
| WR 20a B | Wd2 | 81.9±5.5 | 1,150,000±150,000 | 43,000±2,000 | WN6ha | 20,000 | 13.5 combined | eclipsing binary | SIMBAD | [58] |
| R139 A | NGC 2070 | 81.6+7.5 −7.2 | 1,585,000+235,000 −205,000 | 34,000±1,100 | O6.5I | 163,000 | 11.94 combined | evolution | SIMBAD | [60] |
| Tr27-27 | Trumpler 27 | 81 | 1,247,000 | 37,200 | O8III((f)) | 3,900 | 13.31 | evolution | SIMBAD | [44][24] |
| HSH95-46 | R136 | 80+5 −6 | 1,259,000+59,000 −162,000 | 47,500+500 −2,500 | O2-3III(f*) | 163,000 | 14.56±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][10] |
| Arches-F15 | Arches Cluster | 79.7 | 1,414,000 | 35,800 | O4–6If | 25,000 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [33][34] | |
| BI 237 | BSDL 2527 | 79.66 | 661,000 | 51,269 | O2V((f*)) | 165,000 | 13.830±0.0431 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [55][18][j] |
| VFTS 1017 | R136 | 79.0+17.8 −15.9 | 1,622,000+420,000 −334,000 | 50,120±1,800 | O2If*/WN5 | 164,000 | 14.50 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16][10] |
| VFTS 151 | Tarantula Nebula | 79 | 1,047,000 | 42,200 | O6.5II(f)p | 164,000 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][10] | |
| VFTS 94 | Tarantula Nebula | 79 | 955,000 | 42,200 | O3.5Inf*p | 164,000 | 14.161±0.0271 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][18] |
| VFTS 1018 | R136 | 79 | 832,000 | 42,200 | O3III(f*) | 163,000 | 14.34 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11] |
| LH 41-32 | NGC 1910 | 78 | 946,000 | 48,200 | O4III | 160,000 | 13.086±0.0101 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][18] |
| Pismis 24-17 | Pismis 24 | 78 | 851,000 | O3.5III | 5,900 | 11.84 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [61][45] | |
| LSS 4067 | HM 1 | 77 | 1,000,000 | 40,000 | O4If | 11,000 | 11.26±0.07 | evolution | SIMBAD | [62][63] |
| W51-2 | W51 | 77+26 −22 | 724000+167000 −136000–1288000+617000 −417000 | 42,700+2,000 −1,900 | O3V–O5V | 20,000 | evolution | SIMBAD | [12] | |
| R139 B | NGC 2070 | 76.4+7.1 −6.7 | 1,445,000+214,000 −187,000 | 34,700±1,100 | O7I | 163,000 | 11.94 combined | evolution | SIMBAD | [60] |
| NGC 346-W3 | NGC 346 | 76 | 1,038,000 | 51,300 | O3V | 200,000 | 12.80±0.04 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][49] |
| BAT99-68 | NGC 2044 | 76 | 1,000,000 | 45,000 | O3If*/WN7 | 165,000 | 14.13 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [9][18] |
| HD 93632 | Collinder 228 | 76 | 946,000 | 45,400 | O5III(f) | 10,000 | 9.10 | evolution | SIMBAD | [44][14] |
| AB1 | DEM S10 | 75 | 1,175,000 | 79,000 | WN3ha | 197,000 | 15.24±0.02 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [64][49][k] |
| VFTS 457 | NGC 2070 | 74.6+20.1 −9.2 | 1,585,000+410,000 −326,000 | 39,810±1,430 | O3.5If*/WN7 | 164,000 | 13.74 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16][10] |
| HD 38282 A | Runaway fromR136 | 74±4 | 2,754,000+336,000 −300,000 | 50,000±2,000 | WN5/6h | 163,000 | 11.11±0.03 combined | binary | SIMBAD | [65][24] |
| BAT99-6 A | NGC 1747 | 74 | 794,000 | 45,000 | O3If*/WN7 | 165,000 | 11.95combined | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [54] |
| Pismis 24-1NE | Pismis 24 | 74 | 776,000 | O3.5If* | 6,500 | evolution | SIMBAD | [61][66] | ||
| VFTS 608 | NGC 2070 | 74 | 724,000 | 42,200 | O4III(f) | 164,000 | 14.22 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][10] |
| HSH95-31 | R136 | 73±3 | 955,000+68,000 −64,000 | 47,500+1,000 −750 | O2V((f*)) | 163,000 | 14.35 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][10] |
| Mc30-11 | Mercer 30 | 73 | 741,000 | 36,800 | O5.5-6I-II | 40,000 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [42][g] | |
| VFTS 566 | NGC 2070 | 73 | 708,000 | 44,700 | O3III(f*) | 164,000 | 14.05 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][10] |
| Mc30-3 | Mercer 30 | 73 | 676,000 | 39,300 | O6If | 40,000 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [42][g] | |
| NGC 2044-W35 | NGC 2044 | 72 | 863,000 | 48,200 | O4III | 160,000 | 14.10 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][18] |
| VFTS 216 | Tarantula Nebula | 72 | 692,000 | 44,700 | O4V((fc)) | 164,000 | 14.389±0.0641 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][18] |
| VFTS 542 | R136 | 71.4+16.3 −11.3 | 1,445,000+374,000 −297,000 | 44,670±2,010 | O2If*/WN5 | 164,000 | 13.47 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16][10] |
| VFTS 1021 | R136 | 71.4+12.7 −9.2 | 1,259,000+326,000 −259,000 | 35,500±1,500 | O4If+ | 164,000 | 13.31 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16] |
| VFTS 3 | Tarantula Nebula | 71 | 1,072,000 | 21,000 | B1Ia+ | 164,000 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [67][10] | |
| ST2-1 | NGC 2044 | 71 | 946,000 | 44,100 | O5.5III | 160,000 | 14.3 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][46] |
| NGC 3603-A1b | HD 97950 | 70.4±9.3 | 1,000,000 | 42,000 | O3If*/WN5 | 24,800 | 11.18 combined | eclipsing binary | SIMBAD | [47][21][22] |
| Arches-F12 | Arches Cluster | 70.0 | 1,585,000 | 37,300 | WN7–8 | 25,000 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [33][34] | |
| HD 37974 | N135 | 70 | 1,400,000 | 22,500 | B0.5Ia+ | 163,000 | 10.99±0.03 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [68][24][l] |
| M33 X-7 B | Triangulum Galaxy | 70.0±6.9 | 525,000+92,000 −78,000 | 34,000–36,000 | O7III–O8III | 2,700,000 | 18.70 | binary | SIMBAD | [69][70] |
| VFTS 125 | Tarantula Nebula | 69.6+22.3 −17.2 | 794,000+496,000 −281,000 | 55,150±5,520 | Ope | 164,000 | 16.6 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16][46] |
| HD 38282 B | Runaway fromR136 | 69±4 | 2,455,000+300,000 −267,000 | 45,000±2,000 | WN6/7h | 163,000 | 11.11±0.03 combined | binary | SIMBAD | [65][24] |
| HD 229059 | Berkeley 87 | 69 | 1,038,000 | 26,300 | B1Ia | 3,000 | 8.70 | evolution | SIMBAD | [44][14] |
| ST2-32 | NGC 2044 | 69 | 863,000 | 45,400 | O5III | 160,000 | 13.903±0.0921 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][18] |
| ST2-3 | NGC 2044 | 69 | 863,000 | 44,100 | O5.5V | 160,000 | 14.264±0.1241 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][18] |
| W28-23 | NGC 2033 | 69 | 655,000 | 51,300 | O3V | 160,000 | 13.702±0.050 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][28] |
| HD 46150 | NGC 2244 | 69 | 41,100 | O5V((f))z | 5,200 | 6.73 | evolution | SIMBAD | [17][71] | |
| HD 93403 A | Trumpler 16 | 68.5+12.3 −14.6 | 1,047,000+49,000 −47,000 | 39,300±1,100 | O5.5I | 10,400 | 8.27±0.74 combined | evolution | SIMBAD | [72][24] |
| HSH95-47 | R136 | 68±4 | 955,000+117,000 −64,000 | 43,500+1,750 −1,000 | O2V((f*)) | 163,000 | 14.72±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][10][8] |
| HSH95-48 | R136 | 68±4 | 912,000+65,000 −80,000 | 46,500+1,000 −1,500 | O2–3III(f*) | 163,000 | 14.75±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][8] |
| HD 93130 | Collinder 228 | 68 | 863,000 | 39,900 | O7II(f) | 10,000 | 8.04 | evolution | SIMBAD | [44][14] |
| W51-61 | W51 | 68 | 398,000–1,259,000 | 38,000 | O7.5V | 20,000 | evolution | SIMBAD | [12][39] | |
| Sk -69° 200 | NGC 2033 | 67 | 1,038,000 | 26,300 | B1I | 160,000 | 11.18 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][18] |
| BAT99-93 | LH 99 | 67 | 794,000 | 45,000 | O3If* | 165,000 | 13.446±0.0201 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [9][18] |
| Arches-F18 | Arches Cluster | 66.9 | 1,122,000 | 37,300 | O4-6I | 25,000 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [33][34] | |
| Arches-F4 | Arches Cluster | 66.4 | 1,995,000 | 37,300 | WN7-8 | 25,000 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [33][34] | |
| Z15 | Messier 81 | 66.1 | 1,445,000+139,000 −127,000 | 25,000±1,000 | B0.5 | 11,986,000 | 20.495 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [73] |
| HD 5980 B | NGC 346 | 66±10 | 1,778,000+734,000 −519,000 | 45,000+10,000 −7,000 | WN6−7 | 200,000 | 11.31±0.08 combined | binary | SIMBAD | [74][75] |
| BAT99-104 | R136 | 66 | 1,148,000 | 63,000 | O2If*/WN5 | 165,000 | 12.5 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [9][18] |
| Sk -67° 108 | LMC | 66±2 | 933,000+67,000 −82,000 | 43,500+750 −1,000 | O5III(f) | 164,000 | 12.525 | evolution | SIMBAD | [76] |
| HD 190429 A | nearBarnard 146 | 66.0+17.4 −13.4 | 912,000 | 39,000 | O4If | 7,800 | 7.09±0.01 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [77][14] |
| LH 31-1003 | NGC 1858 | 66 | 863,000 | 41,900 | O6Ib(f) | 160,000 | 13.186±0.0101 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][18] |
| VFTS 169 | Tarantula Nebula | 66.0±9.8 | 813,000+284,000 −210,000 | 47,000±1,500 | O2.5V(n)((f*)) | 164,000 | 14.437±0.0251 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16][18] |
| Pismis 24-1SW | Pismis 24 | 66 | 646,000 | O4III | 6,500 | evolution | SIMBAD | [61][66] | ||
| HSH95-89 | R136 | 65+10 −9 | 977,000+198,000 −145,000 | 44,000±2,500 | O4V | 163,000 | 14.76±0.01 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [8] |
| HSH95-40 | R136 | 65+6 −7 | 851,000+104,000 −159,000 | 47,500+2,000 −3,250 | O3V | 163,000 | 14.49 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][10] |
| HSH95-58 | R136 | 65+6 −7 | 741,000+150,000 −96,000 | 47,500+3,000 −2,250 | O2–3V | 163,000 | 14.80±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][10][8] |
| VFTS 63 | Tarantula Nebula | 65 | 575,000 | 42,200 | O5III(n)(fc) | 164,000 | 14.4 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][46] |
| VFTS 145 | Tarantula Nebula | 65 | 741,000 | 39,800 | O8fp | 164,000 | 14.30 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][10] |
| VFTS 518 | NGC 2070 | 65 | 562,000 | 44,700 | O3.5III(f*) | 164,000 | 15.11 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][10] |
| W49-8 | W49 | 65±13 | 676,000+279,000 −197,000 | 40,700+5,000 −4,400 | O3–O7V | 36,200 | evolution | SIMBAD | [38][39] | |
| BD+43° 3654 | Runaway fromCygnus OB2 | 64.6 | 2,030,000±210,000 | 46,800±900 | O6If+ | 5,400 | 10.06±0.04 | evolution | SIMBAD | [78][79] |
| Sk -70° 115 | LMC | 64+3 −2 | 1,047,000+101,000 −92,000 | 34,750±1,000 | O6.5Ifc | 164,000 | 12.166±0.0900 | evolution | SIMBAD | [76] |
| Sk -69° 25 | NGC 1748 | 64 | 787,000 | 43,600 | O6V((f)) | 160,000 | 11.886±0.0101 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][18] |
| HSH95-50 | R136 | 64+5 −4 | 708,000+86,000 −62,000 | 47,000+2,000 −1,250 | O3–4V((f*)) | 163,000 | 14.65±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][10][8] |
| W49-5 | W49 | 64±8 | 661,000+171,000 −136,000 | 42,700+2,000 −1,900 | O3–O5V | 36,200 | evolution | SIMBAD | [38][39] | |
| ST5-71 | NGC 2074 | 63 | 718,000 | 45,400 | O5III | 160,000 | 13.266±0.0201 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][18] |
| VFTS 259 | Tarantula Nebula | 62.6+7.8 −8.6 | 1,000,000+259,000 −206,000 | 36,800+500 −520 | O6Iaf | 164,000 | 13.65 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16][10] |
| Mc30-6a A | Mercer 30 | 62 | 1,349,000 | 29,900 | Ofpe/WN9 | 40,000 | evolution | SIMBAD | [42][g][e] | |
| AB9 | DEM S80 | 62 | 1,122,000 | 100,000 | WN3ha | 197,000 | 15.26±0.13 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [64][49][m] |
| LH 41-1017 | NGC 1910 | 62 | 787,000 | 42,700 | B1 | 160,000 | 12.266±0.0101 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][18] |
| Brey 32 B | NGC 1966 | 62 | 718,000 | 43,600 | O6.5V | 165,000 | 12.317±0.02 combined | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][24] |
| HD 93160 | Trumpler 14 | 62 | 718,000 | 42,700 | O6III | 8,000 | 7.60 | evolution | SIMBAD | [44][14] |
| HSH95-35 | R136 | 62+4 −3 | 661,000+64,000 −44,000 | 47,500+1,500 −1,000 | O3V | 163,000 | 14.32±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][10][8] |
| VFTS 664 | NGC 2070 | 62 | 525,000 | 39,800 | O7II(f) | 164,000 | 13.937±0.0591 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][18] |
| HD 229196 | Cygnus OB9 | 61.6 | 40,862 | O5 | 5,000 | 8.59 | evolution | SIMBAD | [78][45] | |
| HD 5980 A | NGC 346 | 61±10 | 2,239,000+580,000 −460,000 | 45,000±5,000 | WN6h | 200,000 | 11.31±0.08 combined | binary | SIMBAD | [74][75] |
| WR 102hb | Quintuplet cluster | 61 | 2,630,000 | 25,100 | WN9h | 26,000 | evolution | SIMBAD | [80][81] | |
| VFTS 267 | Tarantula Nebula | 61+3 −2 | 813,000+78,000 −72,000 | 42,500±1,250 | O3.5III(f*) | 164,000 | 13.49 | evolution | SIMBAD | [76] |
| LH 41-18 | NGC 1910 | 61 | 787,000 | 38,500 | O8.5V((f)) | 160,000 | 12.586±0.0101 | evolution | SIMBAD | [26][18] |
| AB8 B | NGC 602 | 61+14 −25 | 708,000+183,000 −146,000 | 45,000±5,000 | O4V | 197,000 | 12.90 combined | binary | SIMBAD | [74][82] |
| Mc30-9 A | Mercer 30 | 61 | 676,000 | 34,500 | O6-7I-III | 40,000 | evolution | SIMBAD | [42][g][e] | |
| ST5-25 | NGC 2074 | 61 | 545,000 | 48,600 | O4V | 160,000 | 13.551±0.109 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [26][28] |
| VFTS 422 | NGC 2070 | 61 | 501,000 | 39,800 | O4III(f) | 164,000 | 15.14 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][10] |
| Sk -67° 166 | GKK-A144 | 60.68 | 832,000 | 41,809 | O4If+ | 160,000 | 12.22±0.03 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [55][18][n] |
| Sk -65° 47 | NGC 1923 | 60.68 | 832,000 | 41,809 | O4If | 160,000 | 12.466±0.1521 | spectroscopy | SIMBAD | [55][18] |
| Mc30-7 A | Mercer 30 | 60 | 1,738,000 | 41,400 | WN6 | 40,000 | evolution | SIMBAD | [42][g][e] | |
| R134 | NGC 2070 | 60 | 1,585,000 | 39,800 | WN6(h) | 164,000 | 12.75 | mass-luminosity relation | SIMBAD | [11][10] |
| BAT99-96 | NGC 2070 | 60.0+9.2 −7.7 | 1,349,000+349,000 −277,000 | 41,690±1,500 | WN8(h) | 164,000 | 13.76 | evolution | SIMBAD | [16] |
| Arches-F2 B | Arches Cluster | 60±8 | 1,349,000+165,000 −147,000 | 33,800+2,000 −1,000 | O5–6Ia+ | 25,000 | eclipsing binary | SIMBAD | [59] | |
| HSH95-55 | R136 | 60+6 −5 | 589,000+119,000 −52,000 | 47,500+3,000 −1,500 | O2V((f*))z | 163,000 | 14.74±0.01 | evolution | SIMBAD | [7][10][8] |
A few notable large stars with masses less than 60 M☉ are shown in the table below for the purpose of comparison, ending with theSun, which isvery close, but would otherwise be too small to be included in the list. At present, all the listed stars are naked-eye visible and relatively nearby.
Black holes are the end point ofthe evolution of massive stars.[A] Technically they are not stars, as they no longer generate heat and light via nuclear fusion in their cores. Someblack holes may have cosmological origins, and would then never have been stars. This is thought to be especially likely in the cases of themost massive black holes.