Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

List of fractals by Hausdorff dimension

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

According toBenoit Mandelbrot, "Afractal is by definition a set for which theHausdorff-Besicovitch dimension strictly exceeds thetopological dimension."[1]Presented here is a list of fractals, ordered by increasing Hausdorff dimension, to illustrate what it means for a fractal to have a low or a high dimension.

Deterministic fractals

[edit]
Hausdorff dimension
(exact value)
Hausdorff dimension
(approx.)
NameIllustrationRemarks
Calculated0.538Feigenbaum attractorThe Feigenbaum attractor (see between arrows) is the set of points generated by successive iterations of thelogistic map for the critical parameter valueλ=3.570{\displaystyle \lambda _{\infty }=3.570}, where the period doubling is infinite. This dimension is the same for any differentiable andunimodal function.[2]
log32{\displaystyle \log _{3}2}0.6309Cantor setBuilt by removing the central third at each iteration.Nowhere dense and not acountable set.
log2log(1γ2){\displaystyle {\frac {-\log 2}{\log \left(\displaystyle {\frac {1-\gamma }{2}}\right)}}}0<D<11D generalized symmetric Cantor setBuilt by removing the centralinterval of lengthγln1{\displaystyle \gamma \,l_{n-1}} from each remaining interval of lengthln1=(1γ)n1/2n1{\displaystyle l_{n-1}=(1-\gamma )^{n-1}/2^{n-1}} at thenth iteration.γ=1/3{\displaystyle \gamma =1/3} produces the usual middle-thirdCantor set. Varyingγ{\displaystyle \gamma } between 0 and 1 yields any fractal dimension0<D<1{\displaystyle 0<D<1}.[3]
log2φ=log2(1+5)1{\displaystyle \log _{2}\varphi =\log _{2}(1+{\sqrt {5}})-1}0.6942(1/4, 1/2) asymmetricCantor setBuilt by removing the second quarter at each iteration.[4]

φ=(1+5)/2{\displaystyle \varphi =(1+{\sqrt {5}})/2} (golden ratio).

log105=1log102{\displaystyle \log _{10}5=1-\log _{10}2}0.69897Real numbers whose base 10 digits areevenSimilar to theCantor set.[5]
log(1+2){\displaystyle \log(1+{\sqrt {2}})}0.88137Spectrum of Fibonacci HamiltonianThe study of the spectrum of the Fibonacci Hamiltonian proves upper and lower bounds for its fractal dimension in the large coupling regime. These bounds show that the spectrum converges to an explicit constant.[6][page needed]
1{\displaystyle 1}1Smith–Volterra–Cantor setBuilt by removing the central interval of length22n{\displaystyle 2^{-2n}} from each remaining interval at thenth iteration. Nowhere dense but has aLebesgue measure of 1/2.
1{\displaystyle 1}1Cantor triangleBuilt by replacing a triangle by three copies, iteratively, with ratio 1/3. For r between 0 and 1/2, the fractal dimension islog(3)log(1/r){\displaystyle {\frac {\log(3)}{\log(1/r)}}}.
2+log212=1{\displaystyle 2+\log _{2}{\frac {1}{2}}=1}1Takagi or Blancmange curveDefined on theunit interval byf(x)=n=02ns(2nx){\displaystyle f(x)=\sum \nolimits _{n=0}^{\infty }2^{-n}s(2^{n}x)}, wheres(x){\displaystyle s(x)} is thetriangle wave function. Not a fractal under Mandelbrot's definition, because its topological dimension is also1{\displaystyle 1}.[7] Special case of the Takahi-Landsberg curve:f(x)=n=0wns(2nx){\displaystyle f(x)=\sum \nolimits _{n=0}^{\infty }w^{n}s(2^{n}x)} withw=1/2{\displaystyle w=1/2}. The Hausdorff dimension equals2+log2w{\displaystyle 2+\log _{2}w} forw{\displaystyle w} in[1/2,1]{\displaystyle \left[1/2,1\right]}. (Hunt cited by Mandelbrot[8]).
2logζlogψ{\displaystyle {\dfrac {2\log \zeta }{\log \psi }}}1.0295240599Boundary of the supergolden fractal triangleHereψ{\displaystyle \psi } is thesupergolden ratio (real root ofψ3ψ21=0{\displaystyle \psi ^{3}-\psi ^{2}-1=0}) andζ{\displaystyle \zeta } is the real root ofζ72ζ21=0{\displaystyle \zeta ^{7}-2\zeta ^{2}-1=0}.
Calculated1.0812Julia set z2 + 1/4Julia set off(z) =z2 + 1/4.[9]
Solutions{\displaystyle s} of2|α|3s+|α|4s=1{\displaystyle 2|\alpha |^{3s}+|\alpha |^{4s}=1}1.0933Boundary of theRauzy fractalFractal representation introduced by G.Rauzy of the dynamics associated to the Tribonacci morphism:112{\displaystyle 1\mapsto 12},213{\displaystyle 2\mapsto 13} and31{\displaystyle 3\mapsto 1}.[10][page needed][11]α{\displaystyle \alpha } is one of the conjugated roots ofz3z2z1=0{\displaystyle z^{3}-z^{2}-z-1=0}.
2log73{\displaystyle 2\log _{7}3}1.12915contour of theGosper islandTerm used by Mandelbrot (1977).[12] The Gosper island is the limit of theGosper curve.
Measured (box counting)1.2DendriteJulia setJulia set off(z) =z2 + i.
3logφlog(3+132){\displaystyle {\frac {3\log \varphi }{\log \left(\displaystyle {\frac {3+{\sqrt {13}}}{2}}\right)}}}1.2083Fibonacci word fractal 60°Built from theFibonacci word. See also the standard Fibonacci word fractal.

φ=(1+5)/2{\displaystyle \varphi =(1+{\sqrt {5}})/2} (golden ratio).

2log2(273783+27+37833),or root of 2x1=2(2x)/2{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&2\log _{2}\left(\displaystyle {\frac {{\sqrt[{3}]{27-3{\sqrt {78}}}}+{\sqrt[{3}]{27+3{\sqrt {78}}}}}{3}}\right),\\&{\text{or root of }}2^{x}-1=2^{(2-x)/2}\end{aligned}}}1.2108Boundary of the tame twindragonOne of the six 2-rep-tiles in the plane (can be tiled by two copies of itself, of equal size).[13][14]
1.26Hénon mapThe canonicalHénon map (with parametersa = 1.4 andb = 0.3) has Hausdorff dimension 1.261 ± 0.003. Different parameters yield different dimension values.
log34{\displaystyle \log _{3}4}1.2619TriflakeThree anti-snowflakes arranged in a way that a koch-snowflake forms in between the anti-snowflakes.
log34{\displaystyle \log _{3}4}1.2619Koch curve3 Koch curves form the Koch snowflake or the anti-snowflake.
log34{\displaystyle \log _{3}4}1.2619boundary ofTerdragon curveL-system: same as dragon curve with angle = 30°. The Fudgeflake is based on 3 initial segments placed in a triangle.
log34{\displaystyle \log _{3}4}1.26192DCantor dustCantor set in 2 dimensions.
log34{\displaystyle \log _{3}4}1.26192DL-system branchL-Systems branching pattern having 4 new pieces scaled by 1/3. Generating the pattern using statistical instead of exact self-similarity yields the same fractal dimension.
Calculated1.2683Julia set z2 − 1Julia set off(z) =z2 − 1.[9]
1.3057Apollonian gasketStarting with 3 tangent circles, repeatedly packing new circles into the complementary interstices. Also the limit set generated by reflections in 4 mutually tangent circles. See[9]
1.3285circles inversion fractalThe limit set generated by iterated inversions with respect to 5 mutually tangent circles (in red). Also an Apollonian packing. See[15]
log59{\displaystyle \log _{5}9}1.36521[16]Quadratic von Koch island using the type 1 curve as generatorAlso known as theMinkowski Sausage
Calculated1.3934Douady rabbitJulia set off(z) =z2 -0.123 + 0.745i[9]
log35{\displaystyle \log _{3}5}1.4649Vicsek fractalBuilt by exchanging iteratively each square by a cross of 5 squares.
log35{\displaystyle \log _{3}5}1.4649Quadratic von Koch curve (type 1)One can recognize the pattern of the Vicsek fractal (above).
log5103{\displaystyle \log _{\sqrt {5}}{\frac {10}{3}}}1.4961Quadric cross
The quadric cross is made by scaling the 3-segment generator unit by 51/2 then adding 3 full scaled units, one to each original segment, plus a third of a scaled unit (blue) to increase the length of the pedestal of the starting 3-segment unit (purple).
Built by replacing each end segment with a cross segment scaled by a factor of 51/2, consisting of 3 1/3 new segments, as illustrated in the inset.

Images generated with Fractal Generator for ImageJ.

2log22=32{\displaystyle 2-\log _{2}{\sqrt {2}}={\frac {3}{2}}}1.5000aWeierstrass function:f(x)=k=1sin(2kx)2k{\displaystyle f(x)=\sum _{k=1}^{\infty }{\frac {\sin(2^{k}x)}{{\sqrt {2}}^{\,k}}}}The Hausdorff dimension of thegraph of the Weierstrass functionf:[0,1]R{\displaystyle f:[0,1]\to \mathbb {R} } defined byf(x)=k=1aksin(bkx){\displaystyle f(x)=\sum \nolimits _{k=1}^{\infty }a^{k}\sin(b^{k}x)} with1/b<a<1{\displaystyle 1/b<a<1} andb>1{\displaystyle b>1} is2+logba{\displaystyle 2+\log _{b}a}.[17][18]
log48=32{\displaystyle \log _{4}8={\frac {3}{2}}}1.5000Quadratic von Koch curve (type 2)Also called "Minkowski sausage".
log2(1+736873+73+68733){\displaystyle \log _{2}\left({\frac {1+{\sqrt[{3}]{73-6{\sqrt {87}}}}+{\sqrt[{3}]{73+6{\sqrt {87}}}}}{3}}\right)}1.5236Boundary of theDragon curvecf. Chang & Zhang.[19][14]
log2(1+736873+73+68733){\displaystyle \log _{2}\left({\frac {1+{\sqrt[{3}]{73-6{\sqrt {87}}}}+{\sqrt[{3}]{73+6{\sqrt {87}}}}}{3}}\right)}1.5236Boundary of thetwindragon curveCan be built with two dragon curves. One of the six 2-rep-tiles in the plane (can be tiled by two copies of itself, of equal size).[13]
log23{\displaystyle \log _{2}3}1.58503-branches treeEach branch carries 3 branches (here 90° and 60°). The fractal dimension of the entire tree is the fractal dimension of the terminal branches. NB: the 2-branches tree has a fractal dimension of only 1.
log23{\displaystyle \log _{2}3}1.5850Sierpinski triangleAlso the limiting shape ofPascal's trianglemodulo 2.
log23{\displaystyle \log _{2}3}1.5850Sierpiński arrowhead curveSame limit as the triangle (above) but built with a one-dimensional curve.
log23{\displaystyle \log _{2}3}1.5850Boundary of theT-square fractalThe dimension of the fractal itself (not the boundary) islog24=2{\displaystyle \log _{2}4=2}
logφφ(φ)=φ{\displaystyle \log _{\sqrt[{\varphi }]{\varphi }}(\varphi )=\varphi }1.61803a goldendragonBuilt from two similarities of ratiosr{\displaystyle r} andr2{\displaystyle r^{2}}, withr=1/φ1/φ{\displaystyle r=1/\varphi ^{1/\varphi }}. Its dimension equalsφ{\displaystyle \varphi } because(r2)φ+rφ=1{\displaystyle ({r^{2}})^{\varphi }+r^{\varphi }=1}.

φ=(1+5)/2{\displaystyle \varphi =(1+{\sqrt {5}})/2} (golden ratio).

1+log32{\displaystyle 1+\log _{3}2}1.6309Pascal triangle modulo 3For a triangle modulok, ifk isprime, the fractal dimension is1+logk(k+12){\displaystyle 1+\log _{k}\left({\frac {k+1}{2}}\right)} (cf.Stephen Wolfram[20]).
1+log32{\displaystyle 1+\log _{3}2}1.6309Sierpinski HexagonBuilt in the manner of theSierpinski carpet, on an hexagonal grid, with 6 similitudes of ratio 1/3. TheKoch snowflake is present at all scales.
3logφlog(1+2){\displaystyle {\frac {3\log \varphi }{\log(1+{\sqrt {2}})}}}1.6379Fibonacci word fractalFractal based on theFibonacci word (or Rabbit sequence) Sloane A005614. Illustration :Fractal curve after 23 steps (F23 = 28657 segments).[21]

φ=(1+5)/2{\displaystyle \varphi =(1+{\sqrt {5}})/2} (golden ratio).

Solution of(1/3)s+(1/2)s+(2/3)s=1{\displaystyle (1/3)^{s}+(1/2)^{s}+(2/3)^{s}=1}1.6402Attractor ofIFS with 3similarities of ratios 1/3, 1/2 and 2/3Generalization : Providing theopen set condition holds, the attractor of aniterated function system consisting ofn{\displaystyle n} similarities of ratioscn{\displaystyle c_{n}}, has Hausdorff dimensions{\displaystyle s}, solution of the equation coinciding with the iteration function of the Euclidean contraction factor:k=1ncks=1{\displaystyle \sum \nolimits _{k=1}^{n}c_{k}^{s}=1}.[5]
log832=53{\displaystyle \log _{8}32={\frac {5}{3}}}1.666732-segment quadric fractal (1/8 scaling rule) see also:File:32 Segment One Eighth Scale Quadric Fractal.jpg
Generator for 32 segment 1/8 scale quadric fractal.
Built by scaling the 32 segment generator (see inset) by 1/8 for each iteration, and replacing each segment of the previous structure with a scaled copy of the entire generator. The structure shown is made of 4 generator units and is iterated 3 times. The fractal dimension for the theoretical structure is log 32/log 8 = 1.6667.Images generated with Fractal Generator for ImageJ.
1+log53{\displaystyle 1+\log _{5}3}1.6826Pascal triangle modulo 5For a triangle modulok, ifk is prime, the fractal dimension is1+logk(k+12){\displaystyle 1+\log _{k}\left({\frac {k+1}{2}}\right)} (cf.Stephen Wolfram[20]).
Measured (box-counting)1.7Ikeda map attractorFor parametersa=1,b=0.9,k=0.4 andp=6 in the Ikeda mapzn+1=a+bznexp[i[kp/(1+zn2)]]{\displaystyle z_{n+1}=a+bz_{n}\exp \left[i\left[k-p/\left(1+\lfloor z_{n}\rfloor ^{2}\right)\right]\right]}. It derives from a model of the plane-wave interactivity field in an optical ring laser. Different parameters yield different values.[22]
1+log105{\displaystyle 1+\log _{10}5}1.699050 segment quadric fractal (1/10 scaling rule)Built by scaling the 50 segment generator (see inset) by 1/10 for each iteration, and replacing each segment of the previous structure with a scaled copy of the entire generator. The structure shown is made of 4 generator units and is iterated 3 times. The fractal dimension for the theoretical structure is log 50/log 10 = 1.6990.Images generated with Fractal Generator for ImageJ[23].
Generator for 50 Segment Fractal.
4log52{\displaystyle 4\log _{5}2}1.7227Pinwheel fractalBuilt with Conway's Pinwheel tile.
log37{\displaystyle \log _{3}7}1.7712Sphinx fractalBuilt with the Sphinx hexiamond tiling, removing two of the nine sub-sphinxes.[24]
log37{\displaystyle \log _{3}7}1.7712HexaflakeBuilt by exchanging iteratively each hexagon by a flake of 7 hexagons. Its boundary is the von Koch flake and contains an infinity of Koch snowflakes (black or white).
log37{\displaystyle \log _{3}7}1.7712Fractal H-I de RiveraStarting from a unit square dividing its dimensions into three equal parts to form nine self-similar squares with the first square, two middle squares (the one that is above and the one below the central square) are removed in each of the seven squares not eliminated the process is repeated, so it continues indefinitely.
log4log(2+2cos(85)){\displaystyle {\frac {\log 4}{\log(2+2\cos(85^{\circ }))}}}1.7848Von Koch curve 85°Generalizing the von Koch curve with an anglea chosen between 0 and 90°. The fractal dimension is thenlog4log(2+2cosa)[1,2]{\displaystyle {\frac {\log 4}{\log(2+2\cos a)}}\in [1,2]}.
log2(3log32+2log32){\displaystyle \log _{2}\left(3^{\log _{3}2}+2^{\log _{3}2}\right)}1.8272A self-affine fractal setBuild iteratively from ap-by-q array on a square, withpq{\displaystyle p\leq q}. Its Hausdorff dimension equalslogp(k=1pnka){\displaystyle \log _{p}\left(\sum \nolimits _{k=1}^{p}n_{k}^{a}\right)}[5] witha=logqp{\displaystyle a=\log _{q}p} andnk{\displaystyle n_{k}} is the number of elements in thek{\displaystyle k}th column. Thebox-counting dimension yields a different formula, therefore, a different value. Unlike self-similar sets, the Hausdorff dimension of self-affine sets depends on the position of the iterated elements and there is no formula, so far, for the general case.
log6log(1+φ){\displaystyle {\frac {\log 6}{\log(1+\varphi )}}}1.8617PentaflakeBuilt by exchanging iteratively each pentagon by a flake of 6 pentagons.

φ=(1+5)/2{\displaystyle \varphi =(1+{\sqrt {5}})/2} (golden ratio).

solution of6(1/3)s+5(1/33)s=1{\displaystyle 6(1/3)^{s}+5{(1/3{\sqrt {3}})}^{s}=1}1.8687Monkeys treeThis curve appeared inBenoit Mandelbrot's "Fractal geometry of Nature" (1983). It is based on 6 similarities of ratio1/3{\displaystyle 1/3} and 5 similarities of ratio1/33{\displaystyle 1/3{\sqrt {3}}}.[25]
log38{\displaystyle \log _{3}8}1.8928Sierpinski carpetEach face of the Menger sponge is a Sierpinski carpet, as is the bottom surface of the 3D quadratic Koch surface (type 1).
log38{\displaystyle \log _{3}8}1.89283DCantor dustCantor set in 3 dimensions.
log34+log32=log4log3+log2log3=log8log3{\displaystyle \log _{3}4+\log _{3}2={\frac {\log 4}{\log 3}}+{\frac {\log 2}{\log 3}}={\frac {\log 8}{\log 3}}}1.8928Cartesian product of thevon Koch curve and theCantor setGeneralization : LetF×G be the cartesian product of two fractals setsF andG. ThendimH(F×G)=dimHF+dimHG{\displaystyle \dim _{H}(F\times G)=\dim _{H}F+\dim _{H}G}.[5] See also the 2DCantor dust and theCantor cube.
2log2x{\displaystyle 2\log _{2}x} wherex93x8+3x73x6+2x5+4x48x3+{\displaystyle x^{9}-3x^{8}+3x^{7}-3x^{6}+2x^{5}+4x^{4}-8x^{3}+}8x216x+8=0{\displaystyle 8x^{2}-16x+8=0}1.9340Boundary of theLévy C curveEstimated by Duvall and Keesling (1999). The curve itself has a fractal dimension of 2.
2Penrose tilingSee Ramachandrarao, Sinha & Sanyal.[26]
2{\displaystyle 2}2Boundary of theMandelbrot setThe boundary and the set itself have the same Hausdorff dimension.[27]
2{\displaystyle 2}2Julia setFor determined values ofc (includingcbelonging to the boundary of the Mandelbrot set), the Julia set has a dimension of 2.[27]
2{\displaystyle 2}2Sierpiński curveEveryspace-filling curve filling the plane has a Hausdorff dimension of 2.
2{\displaystyle 2}2Hilbert curve
2{\displaystyle 2}2Peano curveAnd a family of curves built in a similar way, such as theWunderlich curves.
2{\displaystyle 2}2Moore curveCan be extended in 3 dimensions.
2Lebesgue curve or z-order curveUnlike the previous ones this space-filling curve is differentiable almost everywhere. Another type can be defined in 2D. Like the Hilbert Curve it can be extended in 3D.[28]
log22=2{\displaystyle \log _{\sqrt {2}}2=2}2Dragon curveAnd its boundary has a fractal dimension of 1.5236270862.[29]
2Terdragon curveL-system:F → F + F – F, angle = 120°.
log24=2{\displaystyle \log _{2}4=2}2Gosper curveIts boundary is the Gosper island.
Solution of7(1/3)s+6(1/33)s=1{\displaystyle 7({1/3})^{s}+6({1/3{\sqrt {3}}})^{s}=1}2Curve filling theKoch snowflakeProposed by Mandelbrot in 1982,[30] it fills theKoch snowflake. It is based on 7 similarities of ratio 1/3 and 6 similarities of ratio1/33{\displaystyle 1/3{\sqrt {3}}}.
log24=2{\displaystyle \log _{2}4=2}2Sierpiński tetrahedronEachtetrahedron is replaced by 4 tetrahedra.
log24=2{\displaystyle \log _{2}4=2}2H-fractalAlso theMandelbrot tree which has a similar pattern.
log2log(2/2)=2{\displaystyle {\frac {\log 2}{\log(2/{\sqrt {2}})}}=2}2Pythagoras tree (fractal)Every square generates two squares with a reduction ratio of1/2{\displaystyle 1/{\sqrt {2}}}.
log24=2{\displaystyle \log _{2}4=2}22D Greek cross fractalEach segment is replaced by a cross formed by 4 segments.
Measured2.01 ± 0.01Rössler attractorThe fractal dimension of the Rössler attractor is slightly above 2. Fora=0.1,b=0.1 andc=14 it has been estimated between 2.01 and 2.02.[31]
Measured2.06 ± 0.01Lorenz attractorFor parametersρ=40{\displaystyle \rho =40},σ=16{\displaystyle \sigma =16} andβ=4{\displaystyle \beta =4} . See McGuinness (1983)[32]
4+cD+dD=(c+d)D{\displaystyle 4+c^{D}+d^{D}=(c+d)^{D}}2<D<2.3Pyramid surfaceEach triangle is replaced by 6 triangles, of which 4 identical triangles form a diamond based pyramid and the remaining two remain flat with lengthsc{\displaystyle c} andd{\displaystyle d} relative to the pyramid triangles. The dimension is a parameter, self-intersection occurs for values greater than 2.3.[33]
log25{\displaystyle \log _{2}5}2.3219Fractal pyramidEachsquare pyramid is replaced by 5 half-size square pyramids. (Different from the Sierpinski tetrahedron, which replaces eachtriangular pyramid with 4 half-size triangular pyramids).
log20log(2+φ){\displaystyle {\frac {\log 20}{\log(2+\varphi )}}}2.3296Dodecahedron fractalEachdodecahedron is replaced by 20 dodecahedra.

φ=(1+5)/2{\displaystyle \varphi =(1+{\sqrt {5}})/2} (golden ratio).

log313{\displaystyle \log _{3}13}2.33473D quadratic Koch surface (type 1)Extension in 3D of the quadratic Koch curve (type 1). The illustration shows the first (blue block), second (plus green blocks), third (plus yellow blocks) and fourth (plus clear blocks) iterations.
2.4739Apollonian sphere packingThe interstice left by the Apollonian spheres. Apollonian gasket in 3D. Dimension calculated by M. Borkovec, W. De Paris, and R. Peikert.[34]
log432=52{\displaystyle \log _{4}32={\frac {5}{2}}}2.503D quadratic Koch surface (type 2)Extension in 3D of the quadratic Koch curve (type 2). The illustration shows the second iteration.
log(7613)log(21){\displaystyle {\frac {\log \left({\frac {\sqrt {7}}{6}}-{\frac {1}{3}}\right)}{\log({\sqrt {2}}-1)}}}2.529Jerusalem cubeThe iterationn is built with 8 cubes of iterationn−1 (at the corners) and 12 cubes of iteration n-2 (linking the corners). The contraction ratio is21{\displaystyle {\sqrt {2}}-1}.
log12log(1+φ){\displaystyle {\frac {\log 12}{\log(1+\varphi )}}}2.5819Icosahedron fractalEachicosahedron is replaced by 12 icosahedra.

φ=(1+5)/2{\displaystyle \varphi =(1+{\sqrt {5}})/2} (golden ratio).

1+log23{\displaystyle 1+\log _{2}3}2.58493D Greek cross fractalEach segment is replaced by a cross formed by 6 segments.
1+log23{\displaystyle 1+\log _{2}3}2.5849Octahedron fractalEachoctahedron is replaced by 6 octahedra.
1+log23{\displaystyle 1+\log _{2}3}2.5849von Koch surfaceEach equilateral triangular face is cut into 4 equal triangles.

Using the central triangle as the base, form a tetrahedron. Replace the triangular base with the tetrahedral "tent".

log3log(3/2){\displaystyle {\frac {\log 3}{\log(3/2)}}}2.7095Von Koch in 3DStart with a 6-sided polyhedron whose faces are isosceles triangles with sides of ratio 2:2:3 . Replace each polyhedron with 3 copies of itself, 2/3 smaller.[35]
log320{\displaystyle \log _{3}20}2.7268Menger spongeAnd its surface has a fractal dimension oflog320{\displaystyle \log _{3}20}, which is the same as that by volume.
log28=3{\displaystyle \log _{2}8=3}33D Hilbert curveA Hilbert curve extended to 3 dimensions.
log28=3{\displaystyle \log _{2}8=3}33D Lebesgue curveA Lebesgue curve extended to 3 dimensions.
log28=3{\displaystyle \log _{2}8=3}33D Moore curveA Moore curve extended to 3 dimensions.
log28=3{\displaystyle \log _{2}8=3}33DH-fractalA H-fractal extended to 3 dimensions.[36]
3{\displaystyle 3} (conjectured)3 (to be confirmed)MandelbulbExtension of the Mandelbrot set (power 9) in 3 dimensions[37][unreliable source?]

Random and natural fractals

[edit]
Hausdorff dimension
(exact value)
Hausdorff dimension
(approx.)
NameIllustrationRemarks
12{\displaystyle {\frac {1}{2}}}0.5Zeros of aWiener processThe zeros of a Wiener process (Brownian motion) are anowhere dense set ofLebesgue measure 0 with a fractal structure.[5][38]
Solution ofE(C1s+C2s)=1{\displaystyle E(C_{1}^{s}+C_{2}^{s})=1} whereE(C1)=0.5{\displaystyle E(C_{1})=0.5} andE(C2)=0.3{\displaystyle E(C_{2})=0.3}0.7499a randomCantor set with 50% - 30%Generalization: at each iteration, the length of the left interval is defined with a random variableC1{\displaystyle C_{1}}, a variable percentage of the length of the original interval. Same for the right interval, with a random variableC2{\displaystyle C_{2}}. Its Hausdorff Dimensions{\displaystyle s} satisfies:E(C1s+C2s)=1{\displaystyle E(C_{1}^{s}+C_{2}^{s})=1} (whereE(X){\displaystyle E(X)} is theexpected value ofX{\displaystyle X}).[5]
Solution ofs+1=122(s+1)63(s+1){\displaystyle s+1=12\cdot 2^{-(s+1)}-6\cdot 3^{-(s+1)}}1.144...von Koch curve with random intervalThe length of the middle interval is a random variable with uniform distribution on the interval (0,1/3).[5]
Measured1.22 ± 0.02Coastline ofIrelandValues for the fractal dimension of the entire coast of Ireland were determined by McCartney, Abernethy and Gault[39] at theUniversity of Ulster andTheoretical Physics students atTrinity College, Dublin, under the supervision of S. Hutzler.[40]

Note that there are marked differences between Ireland's ragged west coast (fractal dimension of about 1.26) and the much smoother east coast (fractal dimension 1.10)[40]

Measured1.25Coastline of Great BritainFractal dimension of the west coast of Great Britain, as measured byLewis Fry Richardson and cited byBenoît Mandelbrot.[41]
log4log3{\displaystyle {\frac {\log 4}{\log 3}}}1.2619von Koch curve with random orientationOne introduces here an element of randomness which does not affect the dimension, by choosing, at each iteration, to place the equilateral triangle above or below the curve.[5]
43{\displaystyle {\frac {4}{3}}}1.333Boundary of Brownian motion(cf. Mandelbrot,Lawler,Schramm,Werner).[42]
43{\displaystyle {\frac {4}{3}}}1.333Polymer in 2DSimilar to the Brownian motion in 2D with non-self-intersection.[43]
43{\displaystyle {\frac {4}{3}}}1.333Percolation front in 2D,Corrosion front in 2DFractal dimension of the percolation-by-invasion front (accessible perimeter), at thepercolation threshold (59.3%). It's also the fractal dimension of a stopped corrosion front.[43]
1.40Clusters of clusters 2DWhen limited by diffusion, clusters combine progressively to a unique cluster of dimension 1.4.[43]
212{\displaystyle 2-{\frac {1}{2}}}1.5Graph of a regularBrownian function (Wiener process)Graph of a functionf{\displaystyle f} such that, for any two positive realsx{\displaystyle x} andx+h{\displaystyle x+h}, the difference of their imagesf(x+h)f(x){\displaystyle f(x+h)-f(x)} has the centered gaussian distribution with varianceh{\displaystyle h}. Generalization: thefractional Brownian motion of indexα{\displaystyle \alpha } follows the same definition but with a varianceh2α{\displaystyle h^{2\alpha }}, in that case its Hausdorff dimension equals2α{\displaystyle 2-\alpha }.[5]
Measured1.52Coastline of NorwaySee J. Feder.[44]
Measured1.55Self-avoiding walkRandom walk in a square lattice that avoids visiting the same place twice, with a "go-back" routine for avoiding dead ends.
53{\displaystyle {\frac {5}{3}}}1.66Polymer in 3DSimilar to the Brownian motion in a cubic lattice, but without self-intersection.[43]
1.702D DLA ClusterIn 2 dimensions, clusters formed by diffusion-limited aggregation, have a fractal dimension of around 1.70.[43]
log(90.75)log3{\displaystyle {\frac {\log(9\cdot 0.75)}{\log 3}}}1.7381Fractal percolation with 75% probabilityThe fractal percolation model is constructed by the progressive replacement of each square by a 3-by-3 grid in which is placed a random collection of sub-squares, each sub-square being retained with probabilityp. The "almost sure" Hausdorff dimension equalslog(9p)log3{\displaystyle {\frac {\log(9p)}{\log 3}}}.[5]
74{\displaystyle {\frac {7}{4}}}1.752D percolation cluster hullThe hull or boundary of a percolation cluster. Can also be generated by a hull-generating walk,[45] or by Schramm-Loewner Evolution.
9148{\displaystyle {\frac {91}{48}}}1.89582D percolation clusterIn a square lattice, under the sitepercolation threshold (59.3%) the percolation-by-invasion cluster has a fractal dimension of 91/48.[43][46] Beyond that threshold, the cluster is infinite and 91/48 becomes the fractal dimension of the "clearings".
log2log2=2{\displaystyle {\frac {\log 2}{\log {\sqrt {2}}}}=2}2Brownian motionOr random walk. The Hausdorff dimensions equals 2 in 2D, in 3D and in all greater dimensions (K.Falconer "The geometry of fractal sets").
Measured~2Distribution ofgalaxy clustersFrom the 2005 results of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.[47]
2.5Balls of crumpled paperWhen crumpling sheets of different sizes but made of the same type of paper and with the same aspect ratio (for example, different sizes in theISO 216 A series), then the diameter of the balls so obtained elevated to a non-integer exponent between 2 and 3 will be approximately proportional to the area of the sheets from which the balls have been made.[48] Creases will form at all size scales (seeUniversality (dynamical systems)).
2.503D DLA ClusterIn 3 dimensions, clusters formed by diffusion-limited aggregation, have a fractal dimension of around 2.50.[43]
2.50Lichtenberg figureTheir appearance and growth appear to be related to the process of diffusion-limited aggregation or DLA.[43]
312{\displaystyle 3-{\frac {1}{2}}}2.5regularBrownian surfaceA functionf:R2R{\displaystyle f:\mathbb {R} ^{2}\to \mathbb {R} }, gives the height of a point(x,y){\displaystyle (x,y)} such that, for two given positive incrementsh{\displaystyle h} andk{\displaystyle k}, thenf(x+h,y+k)f(x,y){\displaystyle f(x+h,y+k)-f(x,y)} has a centered Gaussian distribution with varianceh2+k2{\displaystyle {\sqrt {h^{2}+k^{2}}}}. Generalization: thefractional Brownian surface of indexα{\displaystyle \alpha } follows the same definition but with a variance(h2+k2)α{\displaystyle (h^{2}+k^{2})^{\alpha }}, in that case its Hausdorff dimension equals3α{\displaystyle 3-\alpha }.[5]
Measured2.523Dpercolation clusterIn a cubic lattice, at the sitepercolation threshold (31.1%), the 3D percolation-by-invasion cluster has a fractal dimension of around 2.52.[46] Beyond that threshold, the cluster is infinite.
Measured and calculated~2.7The surface ofBroccoliSan-Hoon Kim used a direct scanning method and a cross section analysis of a broccoli to conclude that the fractal dimension of it is ~2.7.[49]
Measured~2.8Surface ofhuman brainMeasured with segmented three-dimensional high-resolution magnetic resonance images[50]
Measured and calculated~2.8CauliflowerSan-Hoon Kim used a direct scanning method and a mathematical analysis of the cross section of a cauliflower to conclude that the fractal dimension of it is ~2.8.[49]
2.97Lung surfaceThe alveoli of a lung form a fractal surface close to 3.[43]
Calculated(0,2){\displaystyle \in (0,2)}Multiplicative cascadeThis is an example of amultifractal distribution. However, by choosing its parameters in a particular way we can force the distribution to become a monofractal.[51]

See also

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related tofractals.

Notes and references

[edit]
  1. ^Mandelbrot 1982, p. 15
  2. ^Aurell, Erik (May 1987). "On the metric properties of the Feigenbaum attractor".Journal of Statistical Physics.47 (3–4):439–458.Bibcode:1987JSP....47..439A.doi:10.1007/BF01007519.S2CID 122213380.
  3. ^Cherny, A. Yu; Anitas, E.M.; Kuklin, A.I.; Balasoiu, M.; Osipov, V.A. (2010). "The scattering from generalized Cantor fractals".J. Appl. Crystallogr.43 (4):790–7.arXiv:0911.2497.doi:10.1107/S0021889810014184.S2CID 94779870.
  4. ^Tsang, K. Y. (1986). "Dimensionality of Strange Attractors Determined Analytically".Phys. Rev. Lett.57 (12):1390–1393.Bibcode:1986PhRvL..57.1390T.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.1390.PMID 10033437.
  5. ^abcdefghijkFalconer, Kenneth (1990–2003).Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. xxv.ISBN 978-0-470-84862-3.
  6. ^Damanik, D.; Embree, M.; Gorodetski, A.; Tcheremchantse, S. (2008). "The Fractal Dimension of the Spectrum of the Fibonacci Hamiltonian".Commun. Math. Phys.280 (2):499–516.arXiv:0705.0338.Bibcode:2008CMaPh.280..499D.doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0451-3.S2CID 12245755.
  7. ^Vaz, Cristina (2019).Noções Elementares Sobre Dimensão.ISBN 978-85-65054-86-7.
  8. ^Mandelbrot, Benoit (2002).Gaussian self-affinity and Fractals. Springer.ISBN 978-0-387-98993-8.
  9. ^abcdMcMullen, Curtis T. (3 October 1997). "Hausdorff dimension and conformal dynamics III: Computation of dimension",Abel.Math.Harvard.edu. Accessed: 27 October 2018.
  10. ^Messaoudi, Ali.Frontième de numération complexe",matwbn.icm.edu.pl.(in French) Accessed: 27 October 2018.
  11. ^Lothaire, M. (2005),Applied combinatorics on words, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 105,Cambridge University Press, p. 525,ISBN 978-0-521-84802-2,MR 2165687,Zbl 1133.68067
  12. ^Weisstein, Eric W."Gosper Island".MathWorld. Retrieved27 October 2018.
  13. ^abNgai, Sirvent, Veerman, and Wang (October 2000). "On 2-Reptiles in the Plane 1999",Geometriae Dedicata, Volume 82. Accessed: 29 October 2018.
  14. ^abDuda, Jarek (March 2011). "The Boundary of Periodic Iterated Function Systems",Wolfram.com.
  15. ^Chang, Angel and Zhang, Tianrong."On the Fractal Structure of the Boundary of Dragon Curve". Archived from the original on 14 June 2011. Retrieved9 February 2019.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)pdf
  16. ^Mandelbrot, B. B. (1983).The Fractal Geometry of Nature, p.48. New York: W. H. Freeman.ISBN 9780716711865. Cited in:Weisstein, Eric W."Minkowski Sausage".MathWorld. Retrieved22 September 2019.
  17. ^Shen, Weixiao (2018). "Hausdorff dimension of the graphs of the classical Weierstrass functions".Mathematische Zeitschrift.289 (1–2):223–266.arXiv:1505.03986.doi:10.1007/s00209-017-1949-1.ISSN 0025-5874.S2CID 118844077.
  18. ^N. Zhang. The Hausdorff dimension of the graphs of fractal functions. (In Chinese). Master Thesis. Zhejiang University, 2018.
  19. ^Fractal dimension of the boundary of the dragon fractal
  20. ^ab"Fractal dimension of the Pascal triangle modulo k". Archived fromthe original on 15 October 2012. Retrieved2 October 2006.
  21. ^The Fibonacci word fractal
  22. ^Theiler, James (1990)."Estimating fractal dimension"(PDF).J. Opt. Soc. Am. A.7 (6):1055–73.Bibcode:1990JOSAA...7.1055T.doi:10.1364/JOSAA.7.001055.
  23. ^Fractal Generator for ImageJArchived 20 March 2012 at theWayback Machine.
  24. ^W. Trump, G. Huber, C. Knecht, R. Ziff, to be published
  25. ^Monkeys tree fractal curveArchived 21 September 2002 atarchive.today
  26. ^Fractal dimension of a Penrose tiling
  27. ^abShishikura, Mitsuhiro (1991). "The Hausdorff dimension of the boundary of the Mandelbrot set and Julia sets".arXiv:math/9201282.
  28. ^Lebesgue curve variants
  29. ^Duda, Jarek (2008). "Complex base numeral systems".arXiv:0712.1309v3 [math.DS].
  30. ^Seuil (1982).Penser les mathématiques. Seuil.ISBN 2-02-006061-2.
  31. ^Fractals and the Rössler attractor
  32. ^McGuinness, M.J. (1983). "The fractal dimension of the Lorenz attractor".Physics Letters.99A (1):5–9.Bibcode:1983PhLA...99....5M.doi:10.1016/0375-9601(83)90052-X.
  33. ^Lowe, Thomas (24 October 2016)."Three Variable Dimension Surfaces".ResearchGate.
  34. ^The Fractal dimension of the apollonian sphere packingArchived 6 May 2016 at theWayback Machine
  35. ^Baird, Eric (2014)."The Koch curve in three dimensions" – viaResearchGate.
  36. ^Hou, B.; Xie, H.; Wen, W.; Sheng, P. (2008)."Three-dimensional metallic fractals and their photonic crystal characteristics"(PDF).Phys. Rev. B.77 (12) 125113.Bibcode:2008PhRvB..77l5113H.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.125113.
  37. ^Hausdorff dimension of the Mandelbulb
  38. ^Peter Mörters, Yuval Peres, "Brownian Motion", Cambridge University Press, 2010
  39. ^McCartney, Mark; Abernethya, Gavin; Gaulta, Lisa (24 June 2010)."The Divider Dimension of the Irish Coast".Irish Geography.43 (3):277–284.doi:10.1080/00750778.2011.582632.
  40. ^abHutzler, S. (2013)."Fractal Ireland".Science Spin.58:19–20. Retrieved15 November 2016.(Seecontents page, archived 26 July 2013)
  41. ^How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension, B. Mandelbrot
  42. ^Lawler, Gregory F.; Schramm, Oded; Werner, Wendelin (2001). "The Dimension of the Planar Brownian Frontier is 4/3".Math. Res. Lett.8 (4):401–411.arXiv:math/0010165.Bibcode:2000math.....10165L.doi:10.4310/MRL.2001.v8.n4.a1.S2CID 5877745.
  43. ^abcdefghiSapoval, Bernard (2001).Universalités et fractales. Flammarion-Champs.ISBN 2-08-081466-4.
  44. ^Feder, J., "Fractals", Plenum Press, New York, (1988).
  45. ^Hull-generating walks
  46. ^abM Sahini; M Sahimi (2003).Applications Of Percolation Theory. CRC Press.ISBN 978-0-203-22153-2.
  47. ^Basic properties of galaxy clustering in the light of recent results from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
  48. ^"Power Law Relations". Yale. Archived fromthe original on 28 June 2010. Retrieved29 July 2010.{{cite journal}}:Cite journal requires|journal= (help)
  49. ^abKim, Sang-Hoon (2 February 2008). "Fractal dimensions of a green broccoli and a white cauliflower".arXiv:cond-mat/0411597.
  50. ^Kiselev, Valerij G.; Hahn, Klaus R.; Auer, Dorothee P. (2003). "Is the brain cortex a fractal?".NeuroImage.20 (3):1765–1774.doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00380-X.PMID 14642486.S2CID 14240006.
  51. ^Meakin, Paul (1987). "Diffusion-limited aggregation on multifractal lattices: A model for fluid-fluid displacement in porous media".Physical Review A.36 (6):2833–2837.Bibcode:1987PhRvA..36.2833M.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.36.2833.PMID 9899187.

Further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Characteristics
Iterated function
system
Strange attractor
L-system
Escape-time
fractals
Rendering techniques
Random fractals
People
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_fractals_by_Hausdorff_dimension&oldid=1334935518"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp