This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Lincos language" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(March 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Lincos (an abbreviation of theLatin phraselingua cosmica) is aconstructed language first described in 1960 by Dr.Hans Freudenthal in his bookLincos: Design of a Language for Cosmic Intercourse, Part 1. It is a language designed to be understandable by any possible intelligentextraterrestrial life form, for use in interstellarradio transmissions.^[1] Freudenthal considered that such a language should be easily understood by beings not acquainted with anyEarthlingsyntax or language. Lincos was designed to be capable of encapsulating "the whole bulk of our knowledge".^[2]

The Lincos "dictionary" is intended to be transmitted first before any additional messages. It teaches natural numbers by a series of repeated pulses, separated by pauses. It then teaches >, <, =, +, -, by examples such as. . . . . > . . . (an extended pause is shown around > in this example so as to suggest to an alien that > is a new separate symbol; otherwise, an alien might think that the whole pattern is a new symbol of unknown meaning). In introducing =, unary notation is shown for numbers:. = 1,. . = 2, and so on. This progresses to multiplication, division, variables, and constants, thenpropositional logic,set theory, andfirst-order logic. The dictionary tries to introduce questions by leaving mathematical expressions unsolved (e.g., ? x x + 101 = 11).^{[citation needed]}

The next section of the Lincos dictionary introduces a word forsecond, "Sec", by playing pulses of various lengths, followed by Sec, and the number of seconds, "until the receiver may be expected to remark that the numbers... are proportional to the durations",^[3] thus teaching both that Sec is a unit of time, and exactly how long it is. It then introduces means for measuring durations, referring to moments in time, and talking about past and future events.^{[citation needed]}

Freudenthal's third section is perhaps the most complex, and attempts to convey the concepts and language necessary to describe behavior and conversation between individuals. It uses examples to introduce actors speaking to each other, asking questions, disapproving, quoting other people, knowing and wanting things, promising, and playing. The first steps (having already introduced sets of numbers and questions) are to introduce some new symbols (distinctive patterns of pulses), say that they are NOT numbers, and transmit sequences showing two of these new symbols separated by the word "Inq" (inquiry), followed by a question about an equation, then the symbols reversed, followed by the answer (example below). It is thus expected that, after many repetitions, the recipient will determine that these new symbols are entities asking and answering the questions, rather than some other context for the questions.^{[citation needed]}

Finally, the fourth section describes the concepts and language relating tomass,space, andmotion. This last section goes so far as to describe physical features of human beings and of theSolar System.^[1]

A second book by Freudenthal, planned but never written, would have added four more sections to the dictionary: "Matter", "Earth", "Life", and "Behavior 2". Other researchers have since extended the language somewhat on their own. One example isCosmicOS. Another is a second-generationLingua Cosmica^[4] developed by the Dutch-Swedish astronomer and mathematicianAlexander Ollongren^[5] ofLeiden University, usingconstructive logic.^[1]

Freudenthal's book on Lincos discusses it with many technical words from linguistic and logical theory, usually without defining them, which may have reduced its general interest, though the main chapters can be understood without these technical terms: appellatives, binding, formalization, function, lexicology, logistical, ostensive, quasi-general, semantics, syntax, variables, etc.^{[citation needed]}

For decades, no actual transmissions were made using Lincos; it remained largely a theoretical exercise, untilCanadianastrophysicistsYvan Dutil andStéphane Dumas, working at theCanadian Defense Research Establishment, created a noise-resistant coding system for messages aimed atcommunicating with extraterrestrial civilizations.^{[citation needed]} In 1999, the astrophysicists encoded a message in Lincos and used theYevpatoria RT-70 radio telescope inUkraine to beam it towards close stars. This is known asCosmic Call. The experiment was repeated (using other close stars as target) in 2003. The message was a series of pages describing some basic mathematics, physics and astronomy.^[6] The Dutil–Dumas experiment was promoted by an organization calledEncounter 2001.^[7]

Someresearchers have explored the similar issues in communicating with intelligent animals such ascetaceans.^{[citation needed]} Lincos messages (even if sent by pulses of sound rather than radio) are complex and need to reach the most patient, logically oriented members of the target species. A far simpler approach aimed at average members of a species can cover numbers, >, <, =, +, -, and time.^{[citation needed]}

An example of Lincos from section 3 of Freudenthal's book, showing one individual asking another individual questions:^{[citation needed]}

Note the difference between "good" and "bad" as compared to "true" and "false"; 10/4 is a true answer to the question, soVer ("true") would be a valid response, but since it wasn't reduced to lowest terms, it wasn't what Ha wanted and so he respondedMal ("bad") instead. The book separately teaches Ver and Fal for true and false.^{[citation needed]}

Another example, showing meta-conversation:^{[citation needed]}

• Active SETI
• Alien language
• METI (Messaging Extraterrestrial Intelligence)
• SETI

• Freudenthal, Hans (1960).Lincos: Design of a Language for Cosmic Intercourse. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
• Ollongren, Alexander (2013).Astrolinguistics. New York: Springer.Bibcode:2013adls.book.....O.

• Were it Perfect, Would it Work Better? Survey of a Language for Cosmic Intercourse (Bruno Bassi)

• Constructed languages
• Engineered languages
• Interstellar messages
• Knowledge representation languages
• Search for extraterrestrial intelligence
• 1960 introductions
• Constructed languages introduced in the 1960s

• CS1: unfit URL
• Articles with short description
• Short description matches Wikidata
• Articles needing additional references from March 2022
• All articles needing additional references
• Languages without Glottolog code
• Language articles with IETF language tag
• Conlangs without ISO 639-3 code
• Languages with neither ISO nor Glottolog code
• All articles with unsourced statements
• Articles with unsourced statements from March 2022
• Articles with unsourced statements from February 2017