TheLigures (Latin sg.Ligus; alsoLigustici orLigustini[1]) or in EnglishLigurians, were an ancient people after whomLiguria, a region of present-daynorth-western Italy, is named.[2] Because of the strongCeltic influences on their language and culture, they were also known in antiquity asCelto-Ligures and hence in English asCelto-Ligurians.[3]
In pre-Roman times, the Ligurians occupied the present-dayItalian region ofLiguria,Piedmont, northernTuscany, westernLombardy, westernEmilia-Romagna, and northernSardinia, reaching alsoElba andSicily.[4][5] They inhabited also theFrench region ofProvence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur andCorsica;[6][7][8][9] however, it is generally believed that around2000 BC the Ligurians occupied a much larger area, extending as far as what is todayCatalonia (in the north-eastern corner of theIberian Peninsula).[10][11][12]
The origins of the ancient Ligurians are unclear, and an autochthonous origin is increasingly probable. What little is known today about theancient Ligurian language is based on placenames and inscriptions onsteles representing warriors.[13][14] The lack of evidence does not allow a certain linguistic classification; it may bePre-Indo-European,[15] or anIndo-European language.[16]
The Ligures are referred to asLigyes (Λιγυες) by the Greeks andLigures (earlierLiguses) by theRomans. According toPlutarch, the Ligurians called themselvesAmbrones, which could indicate a relationship with theAmbrones of northern Europe.[17]
The geography ofStrabo, from book 2, chapter 5, section 28 :
TheAlps are inhabited by numerous nations, but allKeltic with the exception of the Ligurians, and these, though of a different race, closely resemble them in their manner of life. They inhabit that portion of the Alps which is next theApennines, and also a part of the Apennines themselves.[18]
— Strabo (1st century BC).
This zone corresponds to the current region ofLiguria inItaly as well as to the formercounty of Nice which could be compared today to theAlpes Maritimes.
The writer, naturalist and Roman philosopherPliny the Elder writes in his book "The Natural History" book III chapter 7 on the Ligurians and Liguria:
The more celebrated of the Ligurian tribes beyond the Alps are theSalluvii, theDeciates, and theOxubii (...) The coast of Liguria extends 211 miles, between the riversVarus andMacra.[19]
Just like Strabo, Pliny the Elder situates Liguria between the riversVarus andMagra. He also quotes the Ligurian peoples living on the other side of the banks of the Var and the Alps. He writes in his book "The Natural History" book III chapter 6 :
Gaul is divided from Italy by the riverVarus, and by the range of theAlps (...) Forum Julii Octavanorum, a colony, which is also called Pacensis and Classica, the riverArgenteus, which flows through it, the district of the Oxubii and that of the Ligauni above whom are the Suetri, the Quariates and the Adunicates. On the coast we have Antipolis, a town with Latian rights, the district of the Deciates, and the riverVarus, which proceeds from Mount Cema, one of the Alps.[20]
Transalpine Ligures are said to have inhabited the South Eastern portion of modern France, between the Alps and theRhone river, from where they constantly battled against the Greek colony of Massalia.[6]
The consul, Quintus Opimius, defeats the Transalpine Ligurians, who had plundered Antipolis and Nicaea, two towns belonging to the Massilians.[8]
— Livy (1st century BC).
But though the early writers of the Greeks call the Sallyes "Ligures", and the country which the Massiliotes hold, "Ligustica," later writers name them "Celtoligures," and attach to their territory all the level country as far asLuerio and theRhodanus,[7]
— Strabo (1st century BC).
Copper begins to be mined from the middle of the4th millennium BC inLiguria with the Libiola and Monte Loreto mines dated to3700 BC. These are the oldest copper mines in the western Mediterranean basin.[21] It was during this period of the Copper Age in Italy that we find throughout Liguria a large number of anthropomorphic stelae in addition to rock engravings.[13][14]
The Polada Culture (a location nearBrescia,Lombardy, Italy) was a cultural horizon extended in thePo valley from eastern Lombardy andVeneto toEmilia and Romagna, formed in the first half of2nd millennium BC perhaps for the arrival of new people from the transalpine regions ofSwitzerland and SouthernGermany.[22] Its influences are also found in the cultures of the Early Bronze Age ofLiguria,Romagna,Corsica,Sardinia (Bonnanaro culture) and Rhone Valley.[23][24][25] There are some commonalities with the previousBell Beaker Culture including the usage of thebow and a certain mastery in metallurgy.[26] Apart from that, the Polada culture does not correspond to the Beaker culture nor to the previousRemedello culture.
TheBronze tools and weapons show similarities with those of theUnetice Culture and other groups in north ofAlps. According toBernard Sergent, the origin of theLigurian linguistic family (in his opinion distantly related to the Celtic and Italic ones) would have to be found in the Polada culture andRhone culture, both southern branches of theUnetice culture.[27]
It is said that the ligurians inhabited the Po valley around the 2,000 B.C., they not only appear in the legends of the Po valley, but would have left traces (linguistic and craft) found in the archaeological also in the area near the northern Adriatic coast.[28] The Ligurians are credited with forming the first villages in the Po Valley of thefacies of the pile dwellings and of the dammed settlements,[29] a society that followed thePolada culture, and is well suited in middle and lateBronze Age.
The ancient name of the Po river (Padus in Latin) derived from theLigurian name of the river:[30]Bod-encus orBod-incus. This word appears in the placenameBodincomagus, a Ligurian town on the right bank of the Po downstream near today's Turin.[31]
According to a legend, Brescia and Barra (Bergamo) were founded by Cydno, forefather of the Ligurians.[32] This myth seems to have a grain of truth, because recent archaeological excavations have unearthed remains of a settlement dating back to 1200 BC that scholars presume to have been built and inhabited by Ligures.[33][34] Others scholars attribute the founding of Bergamo and Brescia to theEtruscans.[35][36]
TheCanegrate culture (13th century BC) may represent the first migratory wave of the proto-Celtic[37] population from the northwest part of the Alps that, through theAlpine passes, penetrated and settled in the westernPo valley betweenLake Maggiore andLake Como (Scamozzina culture). They brought a newfunerary practice—cremation—which supplantedinhumation. It has also been proposed that a more ancient proto-Celtic presence can be traced back to the beginning of the MiddleBronze Age (16th-15th century BC), when north-western Italy appears closely linked regarding the production of bronze artifacts, including ornaments, to the western groups of theTumulus culture (Central Europe, 1600 BC - 1200 BC).[38] The bearers of the Canegrate culture maintained its homogeneity for only a century, after which it melded with the Ligurian populations and with this union gave rise to a new phase called theGolasecca culture,[39][40] which is nowadays identified with theLepontii[41][42] and other Celto-Ligurian tribes.[43]
Within the Golasecca culture territory roughly corresponds with the territories occupied by those tribal groups whose names are reported by Latin and Greek historians and geographers:[38]
The Genoa area has been inhabited since the fifth or fourth millennium BC.[44] According to excavations carried out in the city between 1898 and 1910, the Ligurian population that lived in Genoa maintained trade relations with theEtruscans and the Greeks, since several objects from these populations were found.[45][46] In the 5th century BC the first town, oroppidum, was founded at the top of the hill today called Castello (Castle), which is now inside the medieval old town.[47]
Thucydides (5th century BC) speaks of the Ligures having expelled theSicanians, anIberian tribe, from the banks of the riverSicanus, in Iberia.[48]
%2c_tomba_ligure%2c_III_sec._ac._03.JPG)
Ligurian sepulchres of the Italian Riviera and of Provence, holding cremations, exhibit Etruscan and Celtic influences.[49]
In the third century BC, the Romans were in direct contact with the Ligurians. However, Roman expansionism was directed towards the rich territories ofGaul and the Iberian Peninsula (then underCarthaginian control), and the territory of the Ligurians was on the road (they controlled the Ligurian coasts and the south-western Alps).[50]
Despite Roman efforts, only a few Ligurian tribes made alliance agreements with the Romans, notably the Genuates. The rest soon proved hostile. The hostilities were opened in 238 BC by a coalition of Ligurians andBoii Gauls, but the two peoples soon found themselves in disagreement and the military campaign came to a halt with the dissolution of the alliance. Meanwhile, a Roman fleet commanded by Quintus Fabius Maximus routed Ligurian ships on the coast (234-233 BC), allowing the Romans to control the coastal route to and from Gaul and to counter the Carthaginian expansion inIberia, given that thePisa-Luni-Genoa sea route was now safe.[51]
In 222 BC theInsubres, during a war with Romans occupied theoppidum of Clastidium, that at that time, it was an important locality of the Anamari (orMarici), a Ligurian tribe that, probably for fear of the nearby warlike Insubres, had already accepted the alliance with Rome the year before.[52]
For the first time, the Roman army marched beyond the Po, expanding into Gallia Transpadana. In 222 BC, thebattle of Clastidium was fought and allowed Rome to take the capital of the Insubres,Mediolanum (modern-dayMilan). To consolidate its dominion, Rome created the colonies of Placentia in the territory of the Boii andCremona in that of the Insubres.[53]
With the outbreak of the second Punic war (218 BC) the Ligurian tribes had different attitudes. Some, like the tribes of thewest Riviera and theApuani, allied with the Carthaginians, providing soldiers to Hannibal's troops when he arrived in Northern Italy, hoping that the Carthaginian general would free them from the neighbouring Romans. Others, like theTaurini, took sides in support of the Romans.[54]
The pro-Carthaginian Ligurians took part in theBattle of the Trebia, which the Carthaginians won. Other Ligurians enlisted in the army ofHasdrubal Barca, when he arrived in Cisalpine Gaul (207 BC), in an attempt to rejoin the troops of his brother Hannibal. In the port of Savo (modern-daySavona), then capital of the Ligures Sabazi,triremes of the Carthaginian fleet ofMago Barca, brother of Hannibal, which were intended to cut the Roman trade routes in the Tyrrhenian Sea, found shelter.[55]
In the early stages of the war, the pro-Roman Ligurians suffered. The Taurini were on the path ofHannibal's march into Italy, and in 218 BC, they were attacked by him, as he had allied with their long-standing enemies, theInsubres. The Taurini chief town of Taurasia (modern-dayTurin) was captured by Hannibal's forces after a three-day siege.[56]
In 205 BC, Genua (modern-dayGenoa) was attacked and razed to the ground by Mago.[57]
Near the end of the Second Punic War, Mago was among theIngauni, trying to block the Roman advance. At theBattle of Insubria, he suffered a defeat, and later, died of wounds sustained in the battle. Genua was rebuilt in the same year.
Ligurian troops were present at theBattle of Zama in 202 BC, which marked the final end of Carthage as a great power.[58]
%2c_tomba_ligure%2c_III_sec._ac._02.JPG)
In 200 BC, the Ligures andBoii sacked and destroyed the Roman colony ofPlacentia, effectively controlling the most important ford of the Po Valley.[59]
During the same period, the Romans were at war with the Apuani. Serious Roman efforts began in 182 BC, when both consular armies and a proconsular army were sent against the Ligurians. The wars continued into the 150s BC, when victorious generals celebrated two triumphs over the Ligurians. Here too, the Romans drove many natives off their land and settled colonies in their stead (e.g., Luna and Luca in the 170s BC).[60] During the same period, the Romans were at war with the Ligurian tribes of the northern Apennines.
By the end of the Second Punic War, however, hostilities were not over yet. Ligurian tribes and Carthaginian holdouts operating from the mountain territories continued to fight with guerrilla tactics. Thus, the Romans were forced into continuous military operations in northern Italy. In 201 BC, the Ingauni signed a peace treaty with Rome.[61]
It was only in 197 BC that the Romans, under the leadership of Minucius Rufus, succeeded in regaining control of the Placentia area by subduing the Celelates, Cerdicates,Ilvati and the Boii Gauls and occupying theoppidum of Clastidium.[62]
Genua was rebuilt by the proconsulSpurius Lucretius in the same year. Having defeated Carthage, Rome sought to expand northwards, and used Genua as a support base for raids, between 191 and 154 BC, against the Ligurian tribes of the hinterland, allied for decades with Carthage.[50]
A second phase of the conflict followed (197-155 BC), characterized by the fact that the Apuani Ligurians entrenched themselves on the Apennines, from where they periodically descended to plunder the surrounding territories. The Romans, for their part, organized continuous expeditions to the mountains, hoping to surround and defeat the Ligurians (taking care not to be destroyed by ambushes). In the course of these wars, the Romans celebrated fifteen triumphs and suffered at least one serious defeat.[55]
Historically, the beginning of the campaign dates back to 193 BC on the initiative of the Ligurian conciliabula (federations), who organized a major raid going as far as the right bank of the river Arno. Roman campaigns followed (191, 188 and 187 BC); these were victorious, but not decisive.
In the campaign of 186 BC, the Romans were beaten by the Ligurians in the Magra valley. In this battle, which took place in a narrow and precipitous place, the Romans lost about 4000 soldiers, three eagle insignia of the second legion and eleven banners of the Latin allies. In addition, the consul Quintus Martius was also killed in the battle. It is thought that the place of the battle and the death of the consul gave rise to the place-name of Marciaso, or that of the Canal of March on Mount Caprione in the town of Lerici (near the ruins of the city ofLuni), which was later founded by the Romans. This mountain had a strategic importance because it controlled the valley of Magra and the sea.[63]
In 185 BC, the Ingauni and theIntimilii also rebelled and managed to resist the Roman legions for the next five years, before capitulating in 180 BC. The Apuani, and those of hinterland side still resisted.[64]
However, the Romans wanted to permanently pacify Liguria to facilitate further conquests in Gaul. To that end, they prepared a large army of almost 36,000 soldiers, under the command ofproconsulsPublius Cornelius Cethegus andMarcus Baebius Tamphilus, with the aim of putting an end to Ligurian independence.
In 180 BC, the Romans inflicted a serious defeat on the Apuani Ligures, and deported 40,000 of them to the regions ofSamnium. This deportation was followed by another one of 7,000 Ligurians in the following year. These were one of the few cases in which the Romansdeported defeated populations in such a high number. In 177 BC other groups of Apuani Ligures surrendered to the Roman forces, and were eventually assimilated into Roman culture during the 2nd century BC, while the military campaign continued further north.[65]
The Frinatiates surrendered in 175 BC, followed by theStatielli (172 BC) and the Velleiates (158 BC). The last Apuani resistance was subdued in 155 BC by consulMarcus Claudius Marcellus.
The subjugation of the coastal Ligures and the annexation of the Alpes Maritimae took place in 14 BC, closely following the occupation of the central Alps in 15 BC.[66]
The last Ligurian tribes (e.g.Vocontii andSalluvii) still autonomous, who occupied Provence, were subdued in 124 BC.[67]
Cisalpine Gaul was the part of modern Italy inhabited byCelts during the 4th and 3rd centuries BC. Conquered by theRoman Republic in the 220s BC, it was aRoman province from c. 81 BC until 42 BC, when it was merged intoRoman Italy as indicated in Caesar's will (Acta Caesaris).[68][69] In 49 BC all inhabitants of northern Italy received Roman citizenship.[70]
Around 7 BC,Augustus divided Italy into elevenregiones, as reported byPliny the Elder in hisNaturalis Historia. One of these wasRegio IX: Liguria.[71] Genoa became the centre of this region and the Ligurian populations moved towards the definitive Romanization.
The official historical name did not have the Liguria apposition, due to the contemporary academic use of naming the Augustan regions according to the populations they understood. Regio IX included only the Ligurian territory. This territory extended from the Maritime and Cottian Alps and the Var river (to the west) to the Trebbia and the Magra bordering Regio VIII Aemilia and Regio VII Etruria (to the east), and the Po to the north.[72]
Pliny describes the region thus:[73] "patet ora Liguriae inter amnes Varum et Macram XXXI Milia passuum. Haec regio ex descriptione Augusti nona est".
People with Ligurian names were living south ofPlacentia, in Italy, as late as 102 AD.[17]
In 126 AD the Liguria region was the birthplace ofPertinax, Roman soldier and politician who becameRoman Emperor.
In the 19th century, the origins of the Ligures drew renewed attention from scholars.Amédée Thierry, a French historian and journalist, linked them to theIberians.[74] The historian of theBourgogne and specialist in its Gallic culture, Dominique-François-Louis Roget, Baron de Belloguet, would later claim aGallic origin of the Ligurians.[75] During the Iron Age the spoken language, the main divinities and the workmanship of the artifacts unearthed in the area of Liguria (such as the numeroustorcs found) were similar to those of Celtic culture in both style and type.[76]
Karl Müllenhoff, professor of Germanic antiquities at the Universities of Kiel and Berlin, studying the sources of theOra maritima byAvienius (aLatin poet who lived in the 4th century AD, but who used as a source for his own work aPhoenicianPeriplum of the 6th century BC),[77] held that the name 'Ligurians' generically referred to various peoples who lived in western Europe, including the Celts, but thought the "real Ligurians" were aPre-Indo-European population.[78] Italian geologist and paleontologistArturo Issel considered Ligurians to be direct descendants of theCro-Magnon people that lived throughout Gaul from theMesolithic period.[79]
Those in favor of anIndo-European origin includedHenri d'Arbois de Jubainville, a 19th-century French historian, who argued inLes Premiers habitants de l'Europe (1877) that the Ligurians were the earliest Indo-European speakers of western Europe. Jubainville's "Celto-Ligurian hypothesis", as it later became known, was significantly expanded in the second edition of his initial study. It inspired a body of contemporaryphilological research, as well as some archaeological work. The Celto-Ligurian hypothesis became associated with theFunnelbeaker culture and "expanded to cover much of Central Europe".[80]
Julius Pokorny adapted the Celto-Ligurian hypothesis into one linking the Ligures to theIllyrians, citing an array of similar evidence from Eastern Europe. Under this theory the "Ligures-Illyrians" became associated with the prehistoricUrnfield peoples.[81]
The 1935 work of Frederick Orton even suggests that the Ligurians may have possibly been ofPashtunAfghan origin.[82]
Today some accounts suggest that the Ligures represented the northern branch of an ethno-linguistic layer older than and very different from theproto-Italic peoples. It was believed that a "Ligurian-Sicanian" culture occupied a wide area of southern Europe,[83] stretching from Liguria to Sicily and Iberia. However, while any such area would be broadly similar to that of the paleo-European "Tyrrhenian culture" hypothesized by later modern scholars, there are no known links between the Tyrrenians and Ligurians.
There are others such asDominique Garcia, who question whether the Ligures can be considered a distinct ethnic group or culture from the surrounding cultures.[84][85]
The Ligurians never formed a centralized state, they were in fact divided into independent tribes, in turn organized in small villages or castles. Rare were theoppidas, to which corresponded the federal capitals of the individual tribes or important commercial emporiums.[86]
Within the tribes, an egalitarian and communal spirit prevailed. If there was also a noble class, this was tempered by "tribal rallies" in which all the classes participated; there does not seem to have been any pre-organized magistracy. There were no dynastic leaders either: the Ligurian "king" was elected as leader of a tribe or a federation of tribes; only in late period did a real dynastic aristocratic class begin to emerge. Originally there was no slavery:prisoners of war were massacred orsacrificed.[87]
Diodorus Siculus, in the first century B.C., writes that women take part in the work of toil alongside men.[88]
_01.JPG)
Among the most important testimonies, the sacred mountain sites (Mont Bègo,Monte Beigua) and the development ofmegalithicism (statues-stelae ofLunigiana) are worth mentioning.[89]
The spectacularMont Bégo inVallée des merveilles is the most representative site of the numerous sacred sites covered with rock carvings, and in particular with cupels, gullies and ritual basins. The latter would indicate that a fundamental part of the rites of the ancient Ligurians, provided for the use of water (or milk, blood?). The site ofMont Bégo has an extension and spectacularity comparable to the sites ofVal Camonica. Another important sacred centre isMount Beigua,[90] but the reality is that many promontories inNorth-west Italy and theAlps present these types of sacred centres.
In general, it is believed that the Ligurian religion was rather primitive, addressed to supernatural tutelary gods, representing the great forces of nature,[91] and from which you could get help and protection through their divination.
Another important deity wasCycnus of Liguria, who was a king ofLiguria, a beloved and kin ofPhaethon, who lamented his death and was subsequently turned into aswan and then aconstellation.[92]
Diodorus Siculus reports the use of atunic tightened at the waist by a leather belt and closed by a clasp generally bronze; the legs were bare.[93] Other garments used were cloaks "sagum", and during the winter animal skins to shelter from the cold.[94]
Lucan in hisPharsalia (c. 61 AD) described Ligurian tribes as being long-haired, and their hair a shade of auburn (a reddish-brown):
Ligurian tribes, now shorn, in ancient days
First of the long-haired nations, on whose necks
Once flowed the auburn locks in pride supreme.[95]
Diodorus Siculus describes the Ligurians as very fearsome enemies.
The armament varied according to the class and the comfort of the owner, in general however the great mass of the Ligurian warriors was substantiallylight infantry, armed in a poor way.[94][96] The main weapon was the spear, with cusps that could exceed acubit (about 45 cm, or one and half foot ), followed by the sword, ofGallic shape (sometimes cheap because made with soft metals), very rarely the warriors were equipped withbows and arrows.
The protection was entrusted to an oblongshield of wood,[97] always of Celtic typology (but to difference of this last one without metallic boss)[98] and a simple helmet, ofMontefortino type.
The horned helmets, recovered in the Apuani tribe area, were probably used only for ceremonial purpose and they were worn by warchief, to underline their virility and military skills. The use ofarmor is not known. Even if it is possible that the richer warriors usedarmor in organic material like the Gauls[98] or the Greeklinothorax.[99]
Strabo and Diodorus Siculus say they fought mostly on foot, because of the nature of their territory, but their phrasing implies that cavalry was not entirely unknown, and two recently discovered Ligurian graves have included harness fittings. Strabo says that the Salyes, a tribe located north of Massalia, had a substantial cavalry force, but they were one of the several Celto-Ligurian tribes, and the cavalry probably reflected a Celtic element.[93]
The Ligures seem to have been ready to engage as mercenary troops in the service of others. Ligurian auxiliaries are mentioned in the army of the Carthaginian generalHamilcar I in 480 BC.[100] Greek leaders in Sicily continued to recruit Ligurian mercenary forces as late as the time ofAgathocles.[48][101]
TheIngauni, a tribe of sailors located around Albingaunum (nowadaysAlbenga) were famous to engage trade and piracy, hostiles toRome,[102] they were subdued byconsulLucius Emilius Paullus Macedonicus in 181 BC.[103]
According to Plutarch, Ligurian auxiliaries fought for the Romans in theBattle of Pydna, the decisive battle ofThird Macedonian War.[104][93]
Sallustius and Plutarch say that during theJugurthine War (from 112 to 105 BC)[105] and theCimbrian War (from 104 to 101 BC)[106] the Ligurians served as auxiliary troops in the Roman army. In the course of this last conflict they played an important role in the Battle of Aquae Sextae.
The Ligurian economy was based on primitive agriculture, sheep farming, hunting and the exploitation of forests. Diodorus Siculus writes about the Ligurians:
Since their country is mountainous and full of trees, some of them use all day to cut wood, using strong and heavy dark; others, who want to cultivate the land, must deal with breaking stones, because it is so dry soil that you can not pick tools remove a sod, that with it do not rise stones. However, even if they have to fight with so many misfortunes, by means of stubborn work they go beyond nature [...] they often give themselves to hunting, and finding quantities of savage, with it they make up for the lack of bladders; and so it comes, that flowing through their snow-covered mountains, and getting used to practicing then more difficult places of the thickets, they harden their bodies, and strengthen their muscles admirably. Some of them, due to the famine of food, drink water, and live of meat of domestic and wild animals.[107]
Thanks to the contact with the bronze "metal seekers", the Ligurians also dedicated themselves to mining.[108]
The commercial activity is important. Already in ancient times the Ligurians were known in the Mediterranean for the trade of the precious Baltic amber. With the development of the Celtic populations, the Ligurians found themselves controlling a crucial access to the sea, becoming (sometimes in spite of themselves) custodians of an important way of communication.
Although they were not renowned navigators, they came to have a small maritime fleet, and their attitude to navigation is described as follows:
They sail for reason of shops on the sea of Sardinia and Libya, spontaneously exposing themselves to extreme dangers; they use smaller hulls than vulgar boats for this; nor are they practical of the comfort of other ships; and what is surprising is that they are not afraid to sustain the serious risks of storms.[107]
The Ligures lived divided into numerous tribes, among them were: the Genuati, who lived in what is now the area of the city of Genoa; the Tigulli, who lived in what is now the area ofTrigoso; theIngauni, who lived in what is now the area of the city ofAlbenga; theIntimilii who lived in what is now the area ofVentimiglia, theApuani who lived in what is now the areas of the valleys ofMagra andSerchio.[109][110]
Alla relativa abbondanza delle fonti letterarie circa queste popolazioni, che una parte della critica storiografica di tradizione ottocentesca voleva estese dal Magra all'Ebro, non corrisponde un panorama archeologico altrettanto ricco, che anzi, anche all'interno della Liguria storica, è ben lungi dal presentare caratteri unitari.
Pliny held the Sallyi, Deceates, and Oxybii, tribes upon the coast, to be Ligurians. Strabo is more cautious; and informs us that later writers called the Salyes, who extended along the coast a little further than Massalia (Marseilles), Celto-Ligyes (that is, Gallo-Ligurians), from the intermixture of the Gaulish population; but that the earlier Greeks called them Ligyes, and the country which the Massaliots occupied, Ligystic or Ligurian........This agrees with the account ofScylax, who makes the Rhone the limit of the pure Ligurians.Avienius fixes the same limit and the same must have been supposed by Aeschylus.Herodotus also speaks of the Ligyes who dwell above Massalia and here we may observe that from this Grecian colony the Greeks might derive a correct knowledge of the neighbouring people.
Le documentazioni sulla lingua dei Liguri non ne permettono una classificazione linguistica certa (preindoeuropeo di tipo mediterraneo? Indoeuropeo di tipo celtico?).
Ligurian and Celto-Ligurian tombs of the Lombard lakes region, often holding cremations, reveal a special iron culture called the culture of Golasecca.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link){{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
