| This article is part of a series on the |
| Politics of Germany |
|---|
 |
Head of state |
|
| Part ofa series on |
| Liberalism in Germany |
|---|
 |
Parties
|
Theliberal democratic basic order (German:freiheitliche demokratische Grundordnung, informal abbreviationfdGO or FDGO) is a fundamental term inGerman constitutional law. It determines the unalienable, invariable core structure of the German commonwealth. As such, it is the core substance of theGerman constitution.[1] Building upon more general definitions ofliberal democracy, the term has a specific legal meaning inGermany and is part of theGerman (originallyWest German) system of aStreitbare Demokratie ("fortified democracy") that bans attempts to dismantle the liberal democratic basic order by what German authorities refer to as "enemies of the Constitution" or "extremists".[1][2]
In practice, the concept has been used to target various far-right, far-left and other extremist groups. A historical example is the ideological struggle againstSoviet-controlledEast Germany ("GDR") during theCold War, when West Germany's commitment to defending democracy was closely linked with itsopposition to Soviet and East Germanauthoritariancommunism.[3]
Theoretically the concept is associated with anti-totalitarianism and with the scholarly field of democracy and extremism research in Germany.[4] While often relying upon scholars in this field, the classification of extremist organisations is ultimately an administrative decision made by theFederal Office ("BfV") orState Offices for the Protection of the Constitution ("LfV"). Associations that threaten the liberal democratic basic order may be banned by the minister of the interior at federal or state level (decision subject to review byadministrative courts). Anti-constitutional political parties may only be dissolved by theFederal Constitutional Court.[5]
The FDGO touches on the political order and the societal and political values on which Germanliberal democracy rests. According to theFederal Constitutional Court, the free democratic order is defined thus:[6]
The free[a] democratic basic order can be defined as an order which excludes any form oftyranny orarbitrariness and represents a governmental system under arule of law, based uponself-determination of the people as expressed by the will of the existing majority and upon freedom and equality. The fundamental principles of this order include at least: respect for thehuman rights given concrete form in theBasic Law, in particular for the right of a person to life and free development; popular sovereignty;separation of powers; responsibility of government; lawfulness of administration;independence of the judiciary; the multi-party principle; and equality of opportunities for all political parties.
— Federal Constitutional Court, Judgment of 23 October 1952 – 1 BvB 1/51[7]
People and groups that threaten the liberal democratic basic order are referred to as "enemies of the Constitution" or "extremist" in German government and legal language.[8] Parties as well as groups can be banned if they strive to abolish the FDGO. The willingness of a liberal democracy to ban parties that endanger liberal democracy itself has been termed"militant democracy", or "wehrhafte Demokratie" in German. While conceptually largely similar to broader definitions ofliberal democracy, the liberal democratic basic order is distinguished by the measures that are allowed against "extreme" ideologies and groups to defend the order, such as the possibility to ban or officially monitor extremist groups.[9]
According to the 2016 report of the federal office for constitutional protection, opposition to the order stems from both the far-right and far-left extremist spectrum.Far-left formations rally aroundanti-capitalism,anti-militarism,anti-racism andanti-fascism (Antifa) as far-left extremist activist fields, which are not compatible with and opposed to the FDGO.Far-right extremist groups also reject the democratic-constitutional state, rallying around the fields of the racistgreat replacement and otherconspiracy ideologies, defamation of the press,islamophobia andanti-immigrant sentiment.[10]
The liberal democratic basic order has been a core concept in the constitutional law of the Federal Republic of Germany, originallyWest Germany, since 1949, and it played a significant role in the West German government's efforts to counteract communism during theCold War.
The concept is closely linked to theanti-communist policies in the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany) during the Cold War.[11] In the early years of the republic, the extremist and anti-constitutional parties "Communist Party of Germany" (1956) and the "Socialist Reich Party" (1952) were banned. Instituted in 1972, theAnti-Radical Decree aimed at diminishing the influence of far-left radicalism.[8] TheGerman Restitution Laws also contained a "communist exception" that specifically determined that "enemies of the liberal democratic basic order", in practice communists, were not entitled to compensation for earlier Nazi persecution.[12] Communist groups have been extensively monitored by theFederal Office for the Protection of the Constitution and thestate offices for the protection of the constitution under the umbrella term of "far-left extremism"; during the Cold War theFederal Agency for Civic Education also focused in large part on Communists as enemies of the liberal democratic basic order, and the struggle against communism was framed by West German authorities primarily in terms of civic education and anti-extremism.[13]
With the fall of theIron Curtain and thereunification of Germany, the federal republic had to deal with a changing extremist scene, and a revival of far-right extremism, especially in the newly accededeastern German states.[14] In 2003, as well as in 2017, attempts to ban theNational Democratic Party of Germany (NPD) failed. In 2003, theFederal Constitutional Court rejected the ban, as a blocking minority of judges accused the party of being too closely tied to the state - too many undercoverinformants by theBfV had positions in the party, according to them. In the second attempt in 2017, the court rejected the plea due to "missing potential" by the NPD to overthrow the government, yet saying that the party wants to remove the FDGO, and that it is not compatible with the constitutional principles of democracy.[15] The party has since then rebranded to "Die Heimat" ("The Homeland").[16]
In 2025, the far-right extremistAfD party celebrated major election victories in several eastern Germanstate elections.[17][18] Numerous scandals occurred around this time, such as blocking and undermining institutional procedures in state parliaments with a blocking minority,[19] leaks aboutracist plans for large-scale deportation of non-ethnic Germans to enforceethnical homogeneity ("Remigration"),[20]revelation of close and friendly ties of the AfD leadership to theRussian authorities as well as toChinese intelligence[21] and the first occurrence of the AfD, a far-right extremist party, deciding a marginal vote in theGerman parliament.[22] As a result of these controversies, 124 MPs of various parties[23] submitted a motion to discuss a ban on the AfD in the Bundestag, backed up by calls from numerous lawyers, judges and a prosecutor.[24][25] During the debate, the petition ultimately did not bring the needed majority, yet voices in politics and in civil society remained vocal, as the AfD continues to be popular inelection polling for the2025 federal election.[26] A 2021 AfD report by the BfV was leaked bynetzpolitik.org in 2025. According to the leak, the office considered the AfD to pursue efforts against the FDGO and human dignity, and recommended to monitor it.[27]
