Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Liber Abaci

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematics book written in 1202 by Fibonacci

A page of theLiber Abaci from theNational Central Library. The list on the right shows the numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377 (theFibonacci sequence). The 2, 8, and 9 resembleArabic numerals more thanEastern Arabic numerals orIndian numerals.

TheLiber Abaci orLiber Abbaci[1] (Latin for "The Book of Calculation") was a 1202 Latin work onarithmetic by Leonardo of Pisa, posthumously known asFibonacci. It is primarily famous for introducing bothbase-10 positional notation and the symbols known asArabic numerals in Europe.

Premise

[edit]

Liber Abaci was among the first Western books to describe theHindu–Arabic numeral system and to use symbols resembling modern "Arabic numerals". By addressing the applications of both commercial tradesmen and mathematicians, it promoted the superiority of the system and the use of these glyphs.[2]

Although the book's title is sometimes translated as "The Book of the Abacus",Sigler (2002) notes that it is an error to read this as referring to theabacus as a calculating device. Rather, the word "abacus" was used at the time to refer to calculation in any form; the spelling "abbacus" with two "b"s was, and still is in Italy, used to refer to calculation using Hindu-Arabic numerals, which can avoid confusion.[3] The book describes methods of doing calculations without aid of an abacus, and asOre (1948) confirms, for centuries after its publication thealgorismists (followers of the style of calculation demonstrated inLiber Abaci) remained in conflict with the abacists (traditionalists who continued to use the abacus in conjunction with Roman numerals). The historian of mathematicsCarl Boyer emphasizes in hisHistory of Mathematics that although "Liber abaci...isnot on the abacus"per se, nevertheless "...it is a very thorough treatise on algebraic methods and problems in which the use of the Hindu-Arabic numerals is strongly advocated."[4]

Summary of sections

[edit]

The first section introduces the Hindu–Arabic numeral system, including its arithmetic and methods for converting between different representation systems.[5] This section also includes the first known description oftrial division for testing whether a number iscomposite and, if so,factoring it.[6]

The second section presents examples from commerce, such as conversions ofcurrency and measurements, and calculations ofprofit andinterest.[7]

The third section discusses a number of mathematical problems; for instance, it includes theChinese remainder theorem,perfect numbers andMersenne primes as well as formulas forarithmetic series and forsquare pyramidal numbers. Another example in this chapter involves the growth of a population of rabbits, where the solution requires generating a numerical sequence.[8] Although the resultingFibonacci sequence dates back long before Leonardo,[9] its inclusion in his book is why the sequence is named after him today.

The fourth section derives approximations, both numerical and geometrical, ofirrational numbers such as square roots.[10]

The book also includes proofs inEuclidean geometry.[11] Fibonacci's method of solving algebraic equations shows the influence of the early 10th-century Egyptian mathematicianAbū Kāmil Shujāʿ ibn Aslam.[12]

Fibonacci's notation for fractions

[edit]

In readingLiber Abaci, it is helpful to understand Fibonacci's notation for rational numbers, a notation that is intermediate in form between theEgyptian fractions commonly used until that time and thevulgar fractions still in use today.[13]

Fibonacci's notation differs from modern fraction notation in three key ways:

  1. Modern notation generally writes a fraction to the right of the whole number to which it is added, for instance213{\displaystyle 2\,{\tfrac {1}{3}}} for 7/3. Fibonacci instead would write the same fraction to the left, i.e.,132{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{3}}\,2}.
  2. Fibonacci used acomposite fraction notation in which a sequence of numerators and denominators shared the same fraction bar; each such term represented an additional fraction of the given numerator divided by the product of all the denominators below and to the right of it. That is,badc=ac+bcd{\displaystyle {\tfrac {b\,\,a}{d\,\,c}}={\tfrac {a}{c}}+{\tfrac {b}{cd}}}, andcbafed=ad+bde+cdef{\displaystyle {\tfrac {c\,\,b\,\,a}{f\,\,e\,\,d}}={\tfrac {a}{d}}+{\tfrac {b}{de}}+{\tfrac {c}{def}}}. The notation was read from right to left. For example, 29/30 could be written as124235{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1\,\,2\,\,4}{2\,\,3\,\,5}}}, representing the value45+23×5+12×3×5{\displaystyle {\tfrac {4}{5}}+{\tfrac {2}{3\times 5}}+{\tfrac {1}{2\times 3\times 5}}}. This can be viewed as a form ofmixed radix notation and was very convenient for dealing with traditional systems of weights, measures, and currency. For instance, for units of length, afoot is 1/3 of ayard, and aninch is 1/12 of a foot, so a quantity of 5 yards, 2 feet, and734{\displaystyle 7{\tfrac {3}{4}}} inches could be represented as a composite fraction:3 7241235{\displaystyle {\tfrac {3\ \,7\,\,2}{4\,\,12\,\,3}}\,5} yards. However, typical notations for traditional measures, while similarly based on mixed radixes, do not write out the denominators explicitly; the explicit denominators in Fibonacci's notation allow him to use different radixes for different problems when convenient. Sigler also points out an instance where Fibonacci uses composite fractions in which all denominators are 10, prefiguring modern decimal notation for fractions.[14]
  3. Fibonacci sometimes wrote several fractions next to each other, representing a sum of the given fractions. For instance, 1/3+1/4 = 7/12, so a notation like14132{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{4}}\,{\tfrac {1}{3}}\,2} would represent the number that would now more commonly be written as the mixed number2712{\displaystyle 2\,{\tfrac {7}{12}}}, or simply the improper fraction3112{\displaystyle {\tfrac {31}{12}}}. Notation of this form can be distinguished from sequences of numerators and denominators sharing a fraction bar by the visible break in the bar. If all numerators are 1 in a fraction written in this form, and all denominators are different from each other, the result is an Egyptian fraction representation of the number. This notation was also sometimes combined with the composite fraction notation: two composite fractions written next to each other would represent the sum of the fractions.

The complexity of this notation allows numbers to be written in many different ways, and Fibonacci described several methods for converting from one style of representation to another. In particular, chapter II.7 contains a list of methods for converting an improper fraction to an Egyptian fraction, including thegreedy algorithm for Egyptian fractions, also known as the Fibonacci–Sylvester expansion.

Modus Indorum

[edit]

In theLiber Abaci, Fibonacci says the following introducing the affirmativeModus Indorum (the method of the Indians), today known asHindu–Arabic numeral system or base-10 positional notation. It also introduced digits that greatly resembled the modernArabic numerals.

As my father was a public official away from our homeland in theBugia customshouse established for the Pisan merchants who frequently gathered there, he had me in my youth brought to him, looking to find for me a useful and comfortable future; there he wanted me to be in the study of mathematics and to be taught for some days. There from a marvelous instruction in the art of the nine Indian figures, the introduction and knowledge of the art pleased me so much above all else, and I learnt from them, whoever was learned in it, from nearby Egypt, Syria, Greece, Sicily and Provence, and their various methods, to which locations of business I travelled considerably afterwards for much study, and I learnt from the assembled disputations. But this, on the whole, the algorithm and even the Pythagorean arcs, I still reckoned almost an error compared to the Indian method. Therefore strictly embracing the Indian method, and attentive to the study of it, from mine own sense adding some, and some more still from the subtle Euclidean geometric art, applying the sum that I was able to perceive to this book, I worked to put it together in xv distinct chapters, showing certain proof for almost everything that I put in, so that further, this method perfected above the rest, this science is instructed to the eager, and to the Italian people above all others, who up to now are found without a minimum. If, by chance, something less or more proper or necessary I omitted, your indulgence for me is entreated, as there is no one who is without fault, and in all things is altogether circumspect.[15]

The nine Indian figures are:
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
With these nine figures, and with the sign 0 which the Arabs call zephir any number whatsoever is written...[16]

In other words, in his book he advocated the use of the digits 0–9, and ofplace value. Until this time Europe used Roman numerals, making modern mathematics almost impossible. The book thus made an important contribution to the spread of decimal numerals. The spread of the Hindu-Arabic system, however, as Ore writes, was "long-drawn-out", takingmany more centuries to spread widely, and did not become complete until the later part of the 16th century, accelerating dramatically only in the 1500s with the advent of printing.[17]

Textual history

[edit]

The first appearance of the manuscript was in 1202. No copies of this version are known. A revised version ofLiber Abaci, dedicated toMichael Scot, appeared in 1228.[18][19] There are at least nineteen manuscripts extant containing parts of this text.[20] There are three complete versions of this manuscript from the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries.[21] There are a further nine incomplete copies known between the thirteenth and fifteenth centuries, and there may be more not yet identified.[20][21]

There were no known printed versions ofLiber Abaci until Boncompagni's edition of 1857. The first complete English translation was Sigler's text of 2002.[20]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Beebe, Nelson (13 December 2009),Fibonacci's Liber Abaci (Book of Calculation),University of Utah, retrieved2018-11-27
  2. ^Devlin, Keith (2012),The Man of Numbers: Fibonacci's Arithmetic Revolution, Walker Books,ISBN 978-0802779083
  3. ^Sigler, L. E. (trans.) (2002),Fibonacci's Liber Abaci: A Translation into Modern English of Leonardo Pisano's Book of Calculation, Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Springer-Verlag, p. 4,ISBN 0-387-95419-8
  4. ^Boyer, Carl (1968),A History of Mathematics, New York, London, Sydney: John Wiley & Sons, p. 280
  5. ^Sigler 2002, Chapters 1–7.
  6. ^Mollin, Richard A. (2002), "A brief history of factoring and primality testing B. C. (before computers)",Mathematics Magazine,75 (1):18–29,doi:10.2307/3219180,JSTOR 3219180,MR 2107288; see alsoSigler 2002, pp. 65–66
  7. ^Sigler 2002, Chapters 8–11.
  8. ^Sigler 2002, Chapter 12.
  9. ^Singh, Parmanand (1985), "The So-called Fibonacci numbers in ancient and medieval India",Historia Mathematica,12 (3):229–244,doi:10.1016/0315-0860(85)90021-7
  10. ^Sigler 2002, Chapters 13–14.
  11. ^Sigler 2002, Chapter 15.
  12. ^O'Connor, John J.;Robertson, Edmund F.,"Abu Kamil Shuja ibn Aslam",MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive,University of St Andrews
  13. ^Moyon, Marc; Spiesser, Maryvonne (3 June 2015), "L'arithmétique des fractions dans l'œuvre de Fibonacci: fondements & usages",Archive for History of Exact Sciences,69 (4):391–427,doi:10.1007/s00407-015-0155-y
  14. ^Sigler 2002, p. 7.
  15. ^Devlin, Keith (2019),Finding Fibonacci: The Quest to Rediscover the Forgotten Mathematical Genius Who Changed the World, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, pp. 92–93 (quoted on),ISBN 9780691192307,OCLC 975288613, retrieved10 July 2024
  16. ^Sigler 2002, p. 17; for another translation seeGrimm, R. E. (1973),"The Autobiography of Leonardo Pisano"(PDF),The Fibonacci Quarterly,11 (1):99–104,doi:10.1080/00150517.1973.12430873
  17. ^Ore, Øystein (1948),Number Theory and Its History, McGraw Hill. Dover version also available, 1988,ISBN 978-0-486-65620-5
  18. ^Sigler 2002, Chapters 1.
  19. ^Scott, T. C.; Marketos, P.,"Michael Scot", in O'Connor, John J.;Robertson, Edmund F. (eds.),MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive,University of St Andrews; see alsoScott, T. C.; Marketos, P. (March 2014),On the Origin of the Fibonacci Sequence(PDF),MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews
  20. ^abcGermano, Giuseppe (2013),"New editorial perspectives on Fibonacci'sLiber Abaci",Reti Medievali Rivista,14 (2):157–173,doi:10.6092/1593-2214/400
  21. ^ab"Fibonacci, Leonardo, or Leonardo of Pisa",Dictionary of Scientific Biography(PDF), Charles Scribner's Sons, 2008 – viaMacTutor History of Mathematics archive

External links

[edit]
LatinWikisource has original text related to this article:
Books
Theories
Related
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liber_Abaci&oldid=1312548377"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp