Lev Shestov | |
|---|---|
 Shestov in 1927 | |
| Born | Yeguda Lev Shvartsman (1866-01-31)January 31, 1866[1] |
| Died | November 19, 1938(1938-11-19) (aged 72) Paris, France |
| Era | 19th-century philosophy |
| Region | Russian philosophy Western philosophy |
| School | Christian existentialism |
Main interests | Theology,nihilism |
Notable ideas | Despair as "the penultimate word" |
Lev Isaakovich Shestov (Russian:Лев Исаакович Шестов; 31 January [O.S. 13 February][1] 1866 – 19 November 1938), bornYeguda Lev Shvartsman (Russian:Иегуда Лейб Шварцман), was a Russianexistentialist andreligious philosopher. He is best known for his critiques of both philosophicalrationalism andpositivism. His work advocated a movement beyondreason andmetaphysics, arguing that these are incapable of conclusively establishing truth about ultimate problems, including the nature of God orexistence.[2] Contemporary scholars have associated his work with the label "anti-philosophy."[3][4]
Shestov wrote extensively on philosophers such asNietzsche andKierkegaard, as well as Russian writers such asDostoyevsky,Tolstoy, andChekhov.[2] His published books includeApotheosis of Groundlessness (1905) and hismagnum opusAthens and Jerusalem (1930–37). After emigrating to France in 1921, he befriended and influenced thinkers such asEdmund Husserl,Benjamin Fondane,Rachel Bespaloff,[5] andGeorges Bataille. He lived in Paris until his death in 1938.
Shestov was born Yeguda Lev Shvartsman inKiev into aJewish family. He was a cousin of Nicholas Pritzker, a lawyer who emigrated toChicago and became the patriarch of thePritzker family that is prominent in business and politics.[6] He obtained an education at various places, due to fractious clashes with authority. He went on to studylaw andmathematics at theMoscow State University but after a clash with the Inspector of Students he was told to return to Kiev, where he completed his studies.
Shestov'sdissertation was rejected by theSt. Vladimir's Imperial University of Kiev on account of the revolutionary tendencies it expressed, thus preventing him from becoming adoctor of law. In 1898 he entered a circle of prominent Russian intellectuals and artists which includedNikolai Berdyaev,Sergei Diaghilev,Dmitri Merezhkovsky andVasily Rozanov. Shestov contributed articles to a journal the circle had established. During this time he completed his first major philosophical work,Good in the Teaching ofTolstoy and Nietzsche: Philosophy and Preaching; two authors profoundly impacting Shestov's thought.
He developed his thinking in a second book onFyodor Dostoyevsky andFriedrich Nietzsche, which increased Shestov's reputation as an original and incisive thinker. InAll Things Are Possible (published in 1905) Shestov adopted theaphoristic style of Friedrich Nietzsche to investigate the difference between Russian and European Literature. Although on the surface it is an exploration of numerous intellectual topics, at its base it is a sardonic work of Existentialist philosophy which both criticizes and satirizes our fundamental attitudes towards life situations.D. H. Lawrence, who wrote the foreword to S.S. Koteliansky's literary translation of the work,[7] summarized Shestov's philosophy with the words: " 'Everything is possible' - this is his really central cry. It is not nihilism. It is only a shaking free of the human psyche from old bonds. The positive central idea is that the human psyche, or soul, really believes in itself, and in nothing else".[8] Shestov deals with key issues such as religion, rationalism, and science in this highly approachable work, topics he would also examine in later writings such asIn Job's Balances.[9] Shestov's own key quote from this work is probably the following: "...we need to think that only one assertion has or can have any objective reality: that nothing on earth is impossible. Every time someone wants to force us to admit that there are other, more limited and limiting truths, we must resist with every means we can lay hands on".
Shestov's works were not met with approval even by some of his closest Russian friends. Many saw in Shestov's work a renunciation ofreason andmetaphysics, and even an espousal ofnihilism. Nevertheless, he would find admirers in such writers asD. H. Lawrence and his friendGeorges Bataille.
In 1908 Shestov moved toFreiburg, Germany, and he stayed there until 1910, when he moved to a small Swiss village namedCoppet. During this time the author worked prolifically. One of the fruits of these labours was the publication ofGreat Vigils andPenultimate Words. He returned to Moscow in 1915, and in this year his son Sergei died in combat against the Germans. During the Moscow period, his work became more influenced by matters of religion andtheology. The seizure of government by theBolsheviks in 1917 made life difficult for Shestov, and the Marxists pressured him to write a defence of Marxist doctrine as an introduction to his new work,Potestas Clavium; otherwise it would not be published. Shestov refused this, yet with the permission of the authorities he lectured at the University of Kiev onGreek philosophy.
Shestov's dislike of the Soviet regime led him to undertake a long journey out of Russia, and he eventually ended up in France. The author was a popular figure in France, where his originality was quickly recognized. In Paris, he soon befriended, and much influenced, the youngGeorges Bataille. He was also close to Eugene andOlga Petit, who helped him and his family relocate to Paris and integrate into the French political and literary circles.[10] That this Russian was newly appreciated is attested by his having been asked to contribute to a prestigious Frenchphilosophy journal. In the interwar years, Shestov continued to develop into a thinker of great prominence. During this time he had become totally immersed in the study of such great theologians asBlaise Pascal andPlotinus, whilst at the same time lecturing at theSorbonne in 1925. In 1926 he was introduced toEdmund Husserl, with whom he maintained a cordial relationship despite radical differences in their philosophical outlook. In 1929, during a return toFreiburg he met with Edmund Husserl, and was urged to study Danish philosopherSøren Kierkegaard.[11]
The discovery of Kierkegaard prompted Shestov to realise that his philosophy shared great similarities, such as his rejection ofidealism, and his belief that man can gain ultimate knowledge through ungroundedsubjective thought rather thanobjective reason andverifiability. However, Shestov maintained that Kierkegaard did not pursue this line of thought far enough, and continued where he thought the Dane left off. The results of this tendency are seen in his workKierkegaard and Existential Philosophy: Vox Clamantis in Deserto, published in 1936, a fundamental work ofChristian existentialism.
Despite his weakening condition Shestov continued to write at a quick pace, and finally completed hismagnum opusAthens and Jerusalem. This work examines the dichotomy between freedom andreason, and argues that reason be rejected in the discipline ofphilosophy. Furthermore, it adumbrates the means by which thescientific method has made philosophy and science irreconcilable, since science concerns itself withempirical observation, whereas (so Shestov argues) philosophy must be concerned withfreedom,God andimmortality, issues that cannot be solved by science.
In 1938, Shestov contracted a serious illness whilst at his vacation home. During this final period, he continued his studies, concentrating in particular onIndian philosophy as well as the works of his contemporary and friendEdmund Husserl, who had died recently. Shestov himself died at a clinic in Paris.
Shestov's philosophy is, at first sight, not a philosophy at all, or it is a kind ofanti-philosophy: it offers no systematic unity, no theoretical explanation of philosophical problems. Most of Shestov's work is fragmentary. With regard to the form (he often used aphorisms) the style may be deemed more web-like than linear, and more explosive than argumentative. The author argues that life itself is, in the last analysis, not comprehensible through logical or rational inquiry. Shestov maintains that no metaphysical speculation can conclusively solve the mysteries of life. Fundamentally, his philosophy is not 'problem-solving', but problem-generating, with a pronounced emphasis on life's enigmatic qualities.
For Shestov, philosophy has employedreason to place humans and God alike in a servile position with respect to "necessities" that are eternally true, unchangeable, and ultimately tyrannical.[12] It is important to note that Shestov does not entirely oppose reason, or science in general, but onlyrationalism andscientism: the tendency to consider reason as a sort of omniscient, omnipotent God that is eternally true and justified.[12] He points to the work ofAristotle,Spinoza,Leibniz,Kant, andHegel alike as reflecting belief in an eternal knowledge discoverable through reason—mechanistic, rational laws (i.e. thelaw of non-contradiction) that would constrain even God by logical necessity.[12] For Shestov, this tendency to deify reason itself results from fear of an arbitrary, unpredictable, and dangerous God; this causes philosophers to deify that which is unchanging or "dead"—that is, opposed to life and the absolute.[12] Shestov targets this as a repressed flaw inWestern philosophy and counters, followingKierkegaard, that God entails the notion that "there is nothing that is impossible"—the absolute need not be limited by reason.[13] For this reason, no conclusive knowledge about the way that things necessarilymust be can be arrived at through reason. As he explained in conversation with his studentBenjamin Fondane:
I know full well that Necessity reigns now… But who can prove to me that it has always been? That it was not something else before? Or that there will not be something else afterwards? It's up to men to side with Necessity, perhaps... But a philosopher must search for Sources - beyond Necessity, beyond Good and Evil.[14]
InAthens and Jerusalem, he states that, while men seek coherence in life,
Why attribute to God, the God whom neither time nor space limits, the same respect and love for order? Why forever speak of "total unity"? … There is no need at all. Consequently, the idea of total unity is an absolutely false idea. ... It is not forbidden for reason to speak of unity and even of unities, but it must renounce total unity - and other things besides. And what a sigh of relief men will breathe when they suddenly discover that the living God, the true God, in no way resembles Him whom reason has shown them until now!
Through this attack on "self-evident truths", Shestov implies that we are all seemingly alone with our experience and suffering, and cannot be helped by philosophical systems. EchoingMartin Luther,Dostoyevsky, and Kierkegaard, he argues that true philosophy involves thinkingagainst the limits of prescribed reason and necessity, and can only begin once, "according to the testimony of reason, all possibilities have been exhausted" and "we run up against the wall of impossibility."[12] Shestov's student Fondane explained that genuine reality "begins beyond the limit of the logically impossible" and only once "every humanly thinkable certainty and probability has proven its impossibility."[12] This explains his lack of a systematic philosophical framework. Such ideas would influenceGilles Deleuze decades later.
Shestov's point of departure is not a theory, or an idea, but an experience, the experience of despair, which Shestov describes as the loss of certainties, the loss of freedom, the loss of themeaning of life. The root of this despair is what he frequently calls 'Necessity', but also 'Reason', 'Idealism' or 'Fate': a certain way of thinking (but at the same time also a very real aspect of the world) that subordinates life to ideas,abstractions, generalisations and thereby kills it, through an ignoring of the uniqueness and livingness of reality.
But despair is not the last word, it is only the 'penultimate word'. The last word cannot be said in human language, can't be captured in theory. His philosophy begins with despair, his whole thinkingis desperate, but Shestov tries to point to somethingbeyond despair - and beyond philosophy.
This is what he calls 'faith': not a belief, not a certainty, but another way of thinking that arises in the midst of the deepest doubt and insecurity. It is the experience that "everything is possible" (Dostoevsky), that the opposite of Necessity is not chance or accident, but possibility, that there does exist a god-given freedom without boundaries, without walls or borders:
Within the “limits of reason” one can create a science, a sublime ethic, and even a religion; but to find G-d one must tear oneself away from the seductions of reason with all its physical and moral constraints, and go to another source of truth. In Scripture, this source bears the enigmatic name “faith,” which is that dimension of thought where truth abandons itself fearlessly and joyously to the entire disposition of the Creator.[15]
Furthermore, although aJewish philosopher, Shestov saw in theresurrection of Christ this victory over necessity. He described theincarnation andresurrection ofJesus as a transfiguring spectacle by which it is demonstrated that the purpose of life is not "mystical" surrender to the "absolute", but ascetical struggle:
"Cur Deus homo? Why, to what purpose, did He become man, expose himself to injurious mistreatment, ignominious and painful death on the cross? Was it not in order to show man, through His example, that no decision is too hard, that it is worthwhile bearing anything in order not to remain in the womb of the One? That any torture whatever to the living being is better than the 'bliss' of the rest-satiate 'ideal' being?"[citation needed]
Likewise, the final words of his last work,Athens and Jerusalem, are:"Philosophy is not Besinnen [think over] but struggle. And this struggle has no end and will have no end. The kingdom of God, as it is written, is attained through violence." (cfMatthew 11:12)
"When I give Shestov's books to anybody, they are usually delighted. There are two authors whom I make propaganda for: one isHerzen, the other is Shestov. They are both totally decent, open-minded, open-hearted human beings."
Shestov was highly admired and honored byNikolai Berdyaev andSergei Bulgakov in Russia,Jules de Gaultier,Georges Bataille,Lucien Lévy-Bruhl,Paul Celan,Gilles Deleuze, andAlbert Camus in France, andD. H. Lawrence,Isaiah Berlin andJohn Middleton Murry in England. Among Jewish thinkers, he influencedHillel Zeitlin.
Today, Shestov is little known in the English-speaking world. This is partly because his works have not been readily available. Partly the specific themes he discusses are unfashionable and "foreign". A sombre and yet ecstatic atmosphere permeates his writings. And his quasi-nihilistic position and religious outlook are an unsettling and incongruous combination, at first sight.
He did however influence writers such as Albert Camus (who wrote about him inLe Mythe de Sisyphe,The Myth of Sisyphus),Benjamin Fondane (his 'pupil'), the poetPaul Celan, and notablyEmil Cioran, who writes about Shestov:
Shestov also appears in the work ofGilles Deleuze; he is referred to sporadically inNietzsche and Philosophy and also appears inDifference and Repetition.
Leo Strauss wrote "Jerusalem and Athens" in part as a response to Shestov's "Athens and Jerusalem".
More recently, alongside Dostoyevsky's philosophy, many have found solace in Shestov's battle against the rational self-consistent and self-evident; for example, Bernard Martin of Case Western Reserve University, who translated his works now found online [external link below]; and the scholar Liza Knapp,[17] who wroteThe Annihilation of Inertia: Dostoevsky and Metaphysics. This book was an evaluation of Dostoyevsky's struggle against the self-evident "wall", and refers to Shestov on several occasions.
According to Michael Richardson's research onGeorges Bataille, Shestov was an early influence on Bataille and was responsible for exposing him to Nietzsche. He argues that Shestov's radical views on theology and an interest in extreme human behavior probably coloured Bataille's own thoughts.
These are Shestov's most important works, in their English translations, and with their date ofwriting:
Media from Commons
Quotations from Wikiquote
