Solidus of Leo II, showing Leo and Zeno enthroned andnimbate and each holding amappa, marked:salus reipublicae ("the Welfare of the State")[1]
Leo II, called "the Younger",[2] was born in 467,[3][b] the son ofZeno, anIsaurian general, andAriadne, the daughter of then-emperor Leo I.[5] He was the maternal grandson of EmperorLeo I and EmpressVerina.[6] As the grandson of Leo I, Leo II had a strong claim to succeed his throne.[7] Leo I, who was becoming increasingly ill, felt obligated to declare a successor to the imperial throne, but passed over his son-in-law on account of his unpopularity. Accordingly, Leo II was madecaesar (heir to the throne) by Leo I around October 472,[c] and was later promoted toaugustus (also by Leo I) in November 473, making him co-emperor alongside his grandfather.[5][6][11] He wascrowned at theHippodrome of Constantinople, and the ceremony was presided over by theEcumenical PatriarchAcacius.[12] The 10th-centuryDe Ceremoniis gives a detailed account of his coronation asaugustus, which is dated to 17 November 473.[13][14][d] He was also appointed as the soleconsul for 474 around this time.[17]
When Leo I died ofdysentery on 18 January 474, Leo II acceded to the throne as soleaugustus.[5][6][11][18] ThehistorianWarren Treadgold wrote that during the reign of Leo II, his father Zeno was the true power behind the throne.[7] On 29 January 474,[e] theByzantine Senate, with the approval of Empress Verina, made his father Zeno co-augustus under Leo II, as Leo was too young to sign official documents.[21][22] Leo II died inConstantinople shortly after 10 October 474.[19][23] The 6th-century writerJohn Malalas states that he reigned "1 year and 23 days", which, reckoning from his coronation asaugustus, would give a death date of 8/9 December. However, he also states that Leo died on "November of the 13thindiction... as was written by the most learnedNestorianos, whose chronicle ended with Leo".Theodorus Lector, another 6th-century historian, states that Leo II died after a rule of 10 months, that is, from January to November 474. This is also corroborated by the 9th-century writerTheophanes the Confessor.[24][8] The 20th-centuryByzantinistGeorge Ostrogorsky simply wrote that Leo II died sometime in the autumn of 474.[25] He died aged 7, which is corroborated by the 6th-century writers John Malalas andJohn of Ephesus.[4] The death of Leo II left Zeno as sole emperor.[5][6][25]
His death having occurred so soon after he became emperor has led to speculation among some modern scholars that he was poisoned by either his mother or father so that Zeno could become sole emperor. However, no contemporary sources raised this suggestion even though Zeno was unpopular; thus it is considered likely that Leo II's death was natural, especially taking into account the high child mortality rate of the time.[5][6][11][23]Victor of Tunnuna, a 6th-century chronicler, says that Leo II did not actually die, but was rather taken by Ariadne and hidden at a monastery. This is likely a confusion withBasiliscus, the son of the Byzantine commanderArmatus. Basiliscus was crownedcaesar in 476 and was almost executed in 477 after his father was murdered by Zeno, but was saved by Ariadne. The confusion likely stems from the fact that Basiliscus was renamed Leo in order to avoid association with the usurper who rose against Zeno.[26]
Zeno was vastly unpopular due to a lack of dynastic prestige, with his only familial ties to the imperial throne being his marriage to Ariadne, the daughter of Leo I, and through his now-dead son Leo II. Additionally, because he was an Isaurian, he was seen as a foreigner by the Byzantine elite, and the treasury was empty on his ascension.[27] Zeno's sole rule was opposed by generalBasiliscus, brother of Verina, the widow of Leo I, who proclaimed him as emperor in January 475. Zeno fled, and Basiliscus ruled for 20 months before Zeno returned and retook the throne.[6][28] Zeno's rule was marked by constant revolts, and it was only through cunning, bribery and luck that he managed to rule for 17 years until his death on 9 April 491.[6][27][28]
^Bury 1958, Chapter X: the reign of Leo I, p. 323, note 1 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFBury1958 (help). "After the coronation of the child the two Leos would be distinguished as Λέων ὁ Μέγας and Λέων ὁ Μικρός, and this I believe, must be the origin of the designation of Leo as 'the Great'; just as reverselyTheodosius II. was called 'the Small', because in his infancy he had been known as ὁ μικρός βασιλεύς to distinguish him fromArcadius. Leo never did anything which could conceivably earn him the title of Great in the sense in which it was bestowed by posterity onAlexander orConstantine."
^Some authors have argued that the date given refers not to Leo II's elevation, but to his death.[15] This, however, would necessitate labeling the entire document as fake, which is highly unlikely.[16]
^John Malalas gives Leo I's death and Zeno's coronation as 3 and 9 February respectively, while theAuctarium Prosperi Havniense gives 18 and 29 January. The latter source is often thought to be more accurate,[19] hence why Leo's death is usually given as 18 January.[20] However, and contradictorily, scholars often used 9 February for Zeno's coronation.[19][8]
James, Liz (2013).Wonderful Things: Byzantium Through Its Art: Papers From the 42nd Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, London, 20–22 March 2009. Farnham: Ashgate Variorum.ISBN978-1-4094-5514-1.
Lee, A. D. (2013).From Rome to Byzantium AD 363 to 565: the Transformation of Ancient Rome. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.ISBN978-0-7486-6835-9.
McEvoy, M. A. (2019). 'Leo II, Zeno, and the transfer of power from a son to his father in AD 474', in J.-W. Drijvers and N. Lenski (eds).The Fifth Century: Age of Transformation. Edipuglia.
Shalev-Hurvitz, Vered (2015).Holy Sites Encircled: The Early Byzantine Concentric Churches of Jerusalem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.ISBN978-0-19-965377-5.