Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Legality

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Consistency with the law of a jurisdiction
For other uses, seeLegality (disambiguation).

Legality is the state of being consistent with thelaw, the construct of legalpower, or lawfulness in a givenjurisdiction.[1]

Definition

[edit]

Feminist jurisprudence

[edit]

Feminist theories of law define legality a distinct but related concept to the law, consisting ofsocially-constructed meanings and practices that depend onsocial forces, such as race, gender, and class.[2] Ewick and Sibley define "legality" as "those meanings, sources of authority, and cultural practices that are commonly recognized as legal, although not necessarily approved nor acknowledged by law."[3][4]

Legal doctrine

[edit]

Incontract law, legality of purpose is required of every enforceable contract. One can not validate or enforce a contract to do activity with unlawful purpose.[5]

Principle of legality

[edit]
icon
This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.
Find sources: "Legality" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(June 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Main article:Principle of legality in criminal law

The principle that no one be convicted of a crime without a written legal text which clearly describes the crime is widely accepted and codified in modern democratic states as a basic requirement of the rule of law. It is known in Latin asnulla poena sine lege.

Nulla poena sine lege is a principle ofinternational human rights law and is incorporated into theUniversal Declaration of Human Rights, theInternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and theEuropean Convention on Human Rights. Exceptionally underinternational law, criminal offences may include violations of "the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations", such asgenocide,war crimes andcrimes against humanity, even if such offences are not codified or affirmed in judicial precedent. Following theNuremberg trials, scholars ofjurisprudence have debated whether such exceptions are valid for apparently applying retrospective criminal sanctions in the absence of written law.Natural-law theorists argue that crimes such as genocide are, and have always been, illegal under natural law.

By jurisdiction

[edit]
icon
This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.
Find sources: "Legality" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(June 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

United Kingdom

[edit]

In theUnited Kingdom under the doctrine ofParliamentary sovereignty, the legislature can (in theory) pass such retrospective laws as it sees fit, though article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which has legal force in Britain, forbids conviction for a crime which was not illegal at the time it was committed.

United States

[edit]

In theUnited States, laws may not violate the stated provisions of theUnited States Constitution, which includes a prohibition on retrospective laws.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Kelsen, Hans.General Theory of Law and State (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, c. 1945) (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1949) (New York: Russell & Russell, 1961) (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, c. 2006).
  • Kelsen, Hans.Principles of international law (New York: Rinehart, 1952) (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1966) (Clark, New Jersey: Lawbook Exchange, 2003).
  • Slaughter, Anne-Marie.A new world order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, c. 2004).
  • Nye, Joseph S.Soft power (New York : Public Affairs, c2004).
  • de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, and Rodríguez-Garavito, César A., eds.Law and globalization from below: towards a cosmopolitan legality (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005)
  • Marsh, James L.Unjust legality: a critique of Habermas's philosophy of law (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, c. 2001).
  • Sarat, Austin, et al., eds.The limits of law (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005).
  • Milano, Enrico.Unlawful territorial situations in international law: reconciling effectiveness, legality and legitimacy (Leiden ; Boston: M. Nijhoff, c. 2006).
  • Ackerman, Bruce, ed.Bush v. Gore: the question of legitimacy (New Haven: Yale University Press, c. 2002).
  • Gabriel HallevyA Modern Treatise on the Principle of Legality in Criminal Law (Heidelberg: Springer-Heidelberg, c. 2010).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Definition of Legality".merriam-webster.com. 14 June 2023.
  2. ^Schultz, Vicki (1 January 1990)."Telling Stories about Women and Work: Judicial Interpretations of Sex Segregation in the Workplace in Title VII Cases Raising the Lack of Interest Argument".Harvard Law Review.103 (8):1749–1843.doi:10.2307/1341317.JSTOR 1341317.
  3. ^Berman, Paul Schiff (27 February 2012).Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders. Cambridge University Press.ISBN 978-0-521-76982-2 – via Google Books.
  4. ^Marshall, Anna-Maria (1 July 2003). "Injustice Frames, Legality, and the Everyday Construction of Sexual Harassment".Law & Social Inquiry.28 (3):659–689.doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00211.x.S2CID 145186120.
  5. ^Litvin, Michael (15 September 2009)."Legality of purpose – contracts".cornell.edu.

External links

[edit]
Look uplegality in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Core subjects
Disciplines
Sources of law
Law making
Legal systems
Legal theory
Jurisprudence
Legal institutions
History
International
Other
Stub icon

Thislegal term article is astub. You can help Wikipedia byexpanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Legality&oldid=1308971994"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp