The black boundaries of the colored regions are conic sections. Not shown is the other half of the hyperbola, which is on the unshown other half of the double cone.Conic sections visualized with torch lightThis diagram clarifies the different angles of the cutting planes that result in the different properties of the three types of conic section.
Aconic section,conic or aquadratic curve is acurve obtained from acone's surface intersecting aplane. The three types of conic section are thehyperbola, theparabola, and theellipse; thecircle is a special case of the ellipse, though it was sometimes considered a fourth type. Theancient Greek mathematicians studied conic sections, culminating around 200 BC withApollonius of Perga's systematic work on their properties.
The conic sections in theEuclidean plane have various distinguishing properties, many of which can be used as alternative definitions. One such property defines a non-circular conic[1] to be theset of those points whose distances to some particular point, called afocus, and some particular line, called adirectrix, are in a fixed ratio, called theeccentricity. The type of conic is determined by the value of the eccentricity. Inanalytic geometry, a conic may be defined as aplane algebraic curve of degree 2; that is, as the set of points whose coordinates satisfy aquadratic equation in two variables which can be written in the form The geometric properties of the conic can be deduced from its equation.
In the Euclidean plane, the three types of conic sections appear quite different, but share many properties. By extending the Euclidean plane to include a line at infinity, obtaining aprojective plane, the apparent difference vanishes: the branches of a hyperbola meet in two points at infinity, making it a single closed curve; and the two ends of a parabola meet to make it a closed curve tangent to the line at infinity. Further extension, by expanding thereal coordinates to admitcomplex coordinates, provides the means to see this unification algebraically.
The conic sections have been studied for thousands of years and have provided a rich source of interesting and beautiful results inEuclidean geometry.
Definition
A conic is the curve obtained as the intersection of aplane, called thecutting plane, with the surface of a doublecone (a cone with twonappes). It is usually assumed that the cone is a right circular cone for the purpose of easy description, but this is not required; any double cone with some circular cross-section will suffice. Planes that pass through the vertex of the cone will intersect the cone in a point, a line or a pair of intersecting lines. These are calleddegenerate conics and some authors do not consider them to be conics at all. Unless otherwise stated, "conic" in this article will refer to a non-degenerate conic.
There are three types of conics: theellipse,parabola, andhyperbola. Thecircle is a special kind of ellipse, although historically Apollonius considered it a fourth type. Ellipses arise when the intersection of the cone and plane is aclosed curve. The circle is obtained when the cutting plane is parallel to the plane of the generating circle of the cone; for a right cone, this means the cutting plane is perpendicular to the axis. If the cutting plane isparallel to exactly one generating line of the cone, then the conic is unbounded and is called aparabola. In the remaining case, the figure is ahyperbola: the plane intersectsboth halves of the cone, producing two separate unbounded curves.
Compare alsospheric section (intersection of a plane with a sphere, producing a circle or point), andspherical conic (intersection of an elliptic cone with a concentric sphere).
Eccentricity, focus and directrix
Conic sections of varyingeccentricity sharing a focus point and directrix line, including an ellipse (red,e = 1/2), a parabola (green,e = 1), and a hyperbola (blue,e = 2). The conic of eccentricity0 in this figure is aninfinitesimal circle centered at the focus, and the conic of eccentricity∞ is an infinitesimally separated pair of lines. A circle of finite radius has an infinitely distant directrix, while a pair of lines of finite separation have an infinitely distant focus.
Alternatively, one can define a conic section purely in terms of plane geometry: it is thelocus of all pointsP whose distance to a fixed pointF (called thefocus) is a constant multiplee (called theeccentricity) of the distance fromP to a fixed lineL (called thedirectrix).For0 <e < 1 we obtain an ellipse, fore = 1 a parabola, and fore > 1 a hyperbola.
A circle is a limiting case and is not defined by a focus and directrix in the Euclidean plane. The eccentricity of a circle is defined to be zero and its focus is the center of the circle, but its directrix can only be taken as the line at infinity in the projective plane.[2]
The eccentricity of an ellipse can be seen as a measure of how far the ellipse deviates from being circular.[3]
If the angle between the surface of the cone and its axis is and the angle between the cutting plane and the axis is the eccentricity is[4]
A proof that the above curves defined by thefocus-directrix property are the same as those obtained by planes intersecting a cone is facilitated by the use ofDandelin spheres.[5]
Alternatively, an ellipse can be defined in terms of two focus points, as the locus of points for which the sum of the distances to the two foci is2a; while a hyperbola is the locus for which the difference of distances is2a. (Herea is the semi-major axis defined below.) A parabola may also be defined in terms of its focus and latus rectum line (parallel to the directrix and passing through the focus): it is the locus of points whose distance to the focus plus or minus the distance to the line is equal to2a; plus if the point is between the directrix and the latus rectum, minus otherwise.
Conic parameters
Conic parameters in the case of an ellipse
In addition to the eccentricity (e), foci, and directrix, various geometric features and lengths are associated with a conic section.
Theprincipal axis is the line joining the foci of an ellipse or hyperbola, and its midpoint is the curve'scenter. A parabola has no center.
Thelinear eccentricity (c) is the distance between the center and a focus.
Thelatus rectum is thechord parallel to the directrix and passing through a focus; its half-length is thesemi-latus rectum (ℓ).
Thefocal parameter (p) is the distance from a focus to the corresponding directrix.
Themajor axis is the chord between the two vertices: the longest chord of an ellipse, the shortest chord between the branches of a hyperbola. Its half-length is thesemi-major axis (a). When an ellipse or hyperbola are in standard position as in the equations below, with foci on thex-axis and center at the origin, the vertices of the conic have coordinates(−a, 0) and(a, 0), witha non-negative.
Theminor axis is the shortest diameter of an ellipse, and its half-length is thesemi-minor axis (b), the same valueb as in the standard equation below. By analogy, for a hyperbola the parameterb in the standard equation is also called the semi-minor axis.
Standard forms of an ellipseStandard forms of a parabolaStandard forms of a hyperbola
After introducingCartesian coordinates, the focus-directrix property can be used to produce the equations satisfied by the points of the conic section.[7] By means of a change of coordinates (rotation andtranslation of axes) these equations can be put intostandard forms.[8] For ellipses and hyperbolas a standard form has thex-axis as principal axis and the origin (0,0) as center. The vertices are(±a, 0) and the foci(±c, 0). Defineb by the equationsc2 =a2 −b2 for an ellipse andc2 =a2 +b2 for a hyperbola. For a circle,c = 0 soa2 =b2, withradiusr =a =b. For the parabola, the standard form has the focus on thex-axis at the point(a, 0) and the directrix the line with equationx = −a. In standard form the parabola will always pass through the origin.
For arectangular orequilateral hyperbola, one whose asymptotes are perpendicular, there is an alternative standard form in which the asymptotes are the coordinate axes and the linex =y is the principal axis. The foci then have coordinates(c,c) and(−c, −c).[9]
The first four of these forms are symmetric about both thex-axis andy-axis (for the circle, ellipse and hyperbola), or about thex-axis only (for the parabola). The rectangular hyperbola, however, is instead symmetric about the linesy =x andy = −x.
The above equation can be written in matrix notation as[12]
The general equation can also be written as
This form is a specialization of the homogeneous form used in the more general setting of projective geometry (seebelow).
Discriminant
The conic sections described by this equation can be classified in terms of the value, called thediscriminant of the equation.[13]Thus, the discriminant is− 4Δ whereΔ is thematrix determinant
In the notation used here,A andB are polynomial coefficients, in contrast to some sources that denote the semimajor and semiminor axes asA andB.
Invariants
The discriminantB2 – 4AC of the conic section's quadratic equation (or equivalently thedeterminantAC –B2/4 of the 2 × 2 matrix) and the quantityA +C (thetrace of the 2 × 2 matrix) are invariant under arbitrary rotations and translations of the coordinate axes,[14][15][16] as is the determinant of the3 × 3 matrix above.[17]: pp. 60–62 The constant termF and the sumD2 +E2 are invariant under rotation only.[17]: pp. 60–62
Eccentricity in terms of coefficients
When the conic section is written algebraically as
the eccentricity can be written as a function of the coefficients of the quadratic equation.[18] If4AC =B2 the conic is a parabola and its eccentricity equals 1 (provided it is non-degenerate). Otherwise, assuming the equation represents either a non-degenerate hyperbola or ellipse, the eccentricity is given by
whereη = 1 if the determinant of the3 × 3 matrix above is negative andη = −1 if that determinant is positive.
It can also be shown[17]: p. 89 that the eccentricity is a positive solution of the equation
where again This has precisely one positive solution—the eccentricity— in the case of a parabola or ellipse, while in the case of a hyperbola it has two positive solutions, one of which is the eccentricity.
In the case of an ellipse or hyperbola, the equation
can be converted to canonical form in transformed variables as[19]
or equivalently
where and are theeigenvalues of the matrix — that is, the solutions of the equation
— and is the determinant of the3 × 3 matrix above, and is again the determinant of the 2 × 2 matrix. In the case of an ellipse the squares of the two semi-axes are given by the denominators in the canonical form.
Polar coordinates
Development of the conic section as the eccentricitye increases
Inpolar coordinates, a conic section with one focus at the origin and, if any, the other at a negative value (for an ellipse) or a positive value (for a hyperbola) on thex-axis, is given by the equation
wheree is the eccentricity andl is the semi-latus rectum.
As above, fore = 0, the graph is a circle, for0 <e < 1 the graph is an ellipse, fore = 1 a parabola, and fore > 1 a hyperbola.
The polar form of the equation of a conic is often used indynamics; for instance, determining the orbits of objects revolving about the Sun.[20]
Properties
Just as two (distinct) points determine a line,five points determine a conic. Formally, given any five points in the plane ingeneral linear position, meaning no threecollinear, there is a unique conic passing through them, which will be non-degenerate; this is true in both the Euclidean plane and its extension, the real projective plane. Indeed, given any five points there is a conic passing through them, but if three of the points are collinear the conic will be degenerate (reducible, because it contains a line), and may not be unique; seefurther discussion.
Four points in the plane in general linear position determine a unique conic passing through the first three points and having the fourth point as its center. Thus knowing the center is equivalent to knowing two points on the conic for the purpose of determining the curve.[21]
Furthermore, a conic is determined by any combination ofk points in general position that it passes through and 5 –k lines that are tangent to it, for 0≤k≤5.[22]
Any point in the plane is on either zero, one or twotangent lines of a conic. A point on just one tangent line is on the conic. A point on no tangent line is said to be aninterior point (or inner point) of the conic, while a point on two tangent lines is anexterior point (or outer point).
All the conic sections share areflection property that can be stated as: All mirrors in the shape of a non-degenerate conic section reflect light coming from or going toward one focus toward or away from the other focus. In the case of the parabola, the second focus needs to be thought of as infinitely far away, so that the light rays going toward or coming from the second focus are parallel.[23][24]
Pascal's theorem concerns the collinearity of three points that are constructed from a set of six points on any non-degenerate conic. The theorem also holds for degenerate conics consisting of two lines, but in that case it is known asPappus's theorem.
Non-degenerate conic sections are always "smooth". This is important for many applications, such as aerodynamics, where a smooth surface is required to ensurelaminar flow and to preventturbulence.
History
Menaechmus and early works
It is believed that the first definition of a conic section was given byMenaechmus (died 320 BC) as part of his solution of the Delian problem (Duplicating the cube).[b][25] His work did not survive, not even the names he used for these curves, and is only known through secondary accounts.[26] The definition used at that time differs from the one commonly used today. Cones were constructed by rotating a right triangle about one of its legs so the hypotenuse generates the surface of the cone (such a line is called ageneratrix). Three types of cones were determined by their vertex angles (measured by twice the angle formed by the hypotenuse and the leg being rotated about in the right triangle). The conic section was then determined by intersecting one of these cones with a plane drawn perpendicular to a generatrix. The type of the conic is determined by the type of cone, that is, by the angle formed at the vertex of the cone: If the angle is acute then the conic is an ellipse; if the angle is right then the conic is a parabola; and if the angle is obtuse then the conic is a hyperbola (but only one branch of the curve).[27]
Diagram from Apollonius'Conics, in a 9th-century Arabic translation
The greatest progress in the study of conics by the ancient Greeks is due toApollonius of Perga (diedc. 190 BC), whose eight-volumeConic Sections orConics summarized and greatly extended existing knowledge.[30] Apollonius's study of the properties of these curves made it possible to show that any plane cutting a fixed double cone (two napped), regardless of its angle, will produce a conic according to the earlier definition, leading to the definition commonly used today. Circles, not constructible by the earlier method, are also obtainable in this way. This may account for why Apollonius considered circles a fourth type of conic section, a distinction that is no longer made. Apollonius used the names 'ellipse', 'parabola' and 'hyperbola' for these curves, borrowing the terminology from earlier Pythagorean work on areas.[31]
Apollonius's work was translated into Arabic, and much of his work only survives through the Arabic version.Islamic mathematicians found applications of the theory, most notably the Persian mathematician and poetOmar Khayyám,[33] who found a geometrical method of solvingcubic equations using conic sections.[34][35]
A century before the more famous work of Khayyam,Abu al-Jud used conics to solvequartic and cubic equations,[36] although his solution did not deal with all the cases.[37]
An instrument for drawing conic sections was first described in 1000 AD byAl-Kuhi.[38][39]
Johannes Kepler extended the theory of conics through the "principle of continuity", a precursor to the concept of limits. Kepler first used the term 'foci' in 1604.[40]
Girard Desargues andBlaise Pascal developed a theory of conics using an early form ofprojective geometry and this helped to provide impetus for the study of this new field. In particular, Pascal discovered a theorem known as thehexagrammum mysticum from which many other properties of conics can be deduced.
René Descartes andPierre Fermat both applied their newly discoveredanalytic geometry to the study of conics. This had the effect of reducing the geometrical problems of conics to problems in algebra. However, it wasJohn Wallis in his 1655 treatiseTractatus de sectionibus conicis who first defined the conic sections as instances of equations of second degree.[41] Written earlier, but published later,Jan de Witt'sElementa Curvarum Linearum starts with Kepler'skinematic construction of the conics and then develops the algebraic equations. This work, which uses Fermat's methodology and Descartes' notation has been described as the first textbook on the subject.[42] De Witt invented the term 'directrix'.[42]
Conic sections are important inastronomy: theorbits of two massive objects that interact according toNewton's law of universal gravitation are conic sections if their commoncenter of mass is considered to be at rest. If they are bound together, they will both trace out ellipses; if they are moving apart, they will both follow parabolas or hyperbolas. Seetwo-body problem.
The reflective properties of the conic sections are used in the design of searchlights, radio-telescopes and some optical telescopes.[43] A searchlight uses a parabolic mirror as the reflector, with a bulb at the focus; and a similar construction is used for aparabolic microphone. The 4.2 meterHerschel optical telescope on La Palma, in the Canary islands, uses a primary parabolic mirror to reflect light towards a secondary hyperbolic mirror, which reflects it again to a focus behind the first mirror.
In the real projective plane
The conic sections have some very similar properties in the Euclidean plane and the reasons for this become clearer when the conics are viewed from the perspective of a larger geometry. The Euclidean plane may be embedded in thereal projective plane and the conics may be considered as objects in this projective geometry. One way to do this is to introducehomogeneous coordinates and define a conic to be the set of points whose coordinates satisfy an irreducible quadratic equation in three variables (or equivalently, the zeros of an irreduciblequadratic form). More technically, the set of points that are zeros of a quadratic form (in any number of variables) is called aquadric, and the irreducible quadrics in a two dimensional projective space (that is, having three variables) are traditionally called conics.
The Euclidean planeR2 is embedded in the real projective plane by adjoining aline at infinity (and its correspondingpoints at infinity) so that all the lines of a parallel class meet on this line. On the other hand, starting with the real projective plane, a Euclidean plane is obtained by distinguishing some line as the line at infinity and removing it and all its points.
Intersection at infinity
In aprojective space over any division ring, but in particular over either the real or complex numbers, all non-degenerate conics are equivalent, and thus in projective geometry one speaks of "a conic" without specifying a type. That is, there is a projective transformation that will map any non-degenerate conic to any other non-degenerate conic.[44]
The three types of conic sections will reappear in the affine plane obtained by choosing a line of the projective space to be the line at infinity. The three types are then determined by how this line at infinity intersects the conic in the projective space. In the corresponding affine space, one obtains an ellipse if the conic does not intersect the line at infinity, a parabola if the conic intersects the line at infinity in onedouble point corresponding to the axis, and a hyperbola if the conic intersects the line at infinity in two points corresponding to the asymptotes.[45]
If the determinant of the matrix of the conic section is zero, the conic section isdegenerate.
As multiplying all six coefficients by the same non-zero scalar yields an equation with the same set of zeros, one can consider conics, represented by(A,B,C,D,E,F) as points in the five-dimensionalprojective space
Projective definition of a circle
Metrical concepts of Euclidean geometry (concepts concerned with measuring lengths and angles) can not be immediately extended to the real projective plane.[d] They must be redefined (and generalized) in this new geometry. This can be done for arbitraryprojective planes, but to obtain the real projective plane as the extended Euclidean plane, some specific choices have to be made.[46]
Fix an arbitrary line in a projective plane that shall be referred to as theabsolute line. Select two distinct points on the absolute line and refer to them asabsolute points. Several metrical concepts can be defined with reference to these choices. For instance, given a line containing the pointsA andB, themidpoint of line segmentAB is defined as the pointC which is theprojective harmonic conjugate of the point of intersection ofAB and the absolute line, with respect toA andB.
A conic in a projective plane that contains the two absolute points is called acircle. Since five points determine a conic, a circle (which may be degenerate) is determined by three points. To obtain the extended Euclidean plane, the absolute line is chosen to be the line at infinity of the Euclidean plane and the absolute points are two special points on that line called thecircular points at infinity. Lines containing two points with real coordinates do not pass through the circular points at infinity, so in the Euclidean plane a circle, under this definition, is determined by three points that are notcollinear.[47]
It has been mentioned that circles in the Euclidean plane can not be defined by the focus-directrix property. However, if one were to consider the line at infinity as the directrix, then by taking the eccentricity to bee = 0 a circle will have the focus-directrix property, but it is still not defined by that property.[48] One must be careful in this situation to correctly use the definition of eccentricity as the ratio of the distance of a point on the circle to the focus (length of a radius) to the distance of that point to the directrix (this distance is infinite) which gives the limiting value of zero.
Definition of the Steiner generation of a conic section
Asynthetic (coordinate-free) approach to defining the conic sections in a projective plane was given byJakob Steiner in 1867.
Given two pencils of lines at two points (all lines containing and resp.) and aprojective but notperspective mapping of onto. Then the intersection points of corresponding lines form a non-degenerate projective conic section.[49][50][51][52]
Aperspective mapping of a pencil onto a pencil is abijection (1-1 correspondence) such that corresponding lines intersect on a fixed line, which is called theaxis of the perspectivity.
Aprojective mapping is a finite sequence of perspective mappings.
As a projective mapping in a projective plane over a field (pappian plane) is uniquely determined by prescribing the images of three lines,[53] for the Steiner generation of a conic section, besides two points only the images of 3 lines have to be given. These 5 items (2 points, 3 lines) uniquely determine the conic section.
Line conics
By thePrinciple of Duality in a projective plane, the dual of each point is a line, and the dual of a locus of points (a set of points satisfying some condition) is called anenvelope of lines. Using Steiner's definition of a conic (this locus of points will now be referred to as apoint conic) as the meet of corresponding rays of two related pencils, it is easy to dualize and obtain the corresponding envelope consisting of the joins of corresponding points of two related ranges (points on a line) on different bases (the lines the points are on). Such an envelope is called aline conic (or dual conic).
In the real projective plane, a point conic has the property that every line meets it in two points (which may coincide, or may be complex) and any set of points with this property is a point conic. It follows dually that a line conic has two of its lines through every point and any envelope of lines with this property is a line conic. At every point of a point conic there is a unique tangent line, and dually, on every line of a line conic there is a unique point called apoint of contact. An important theorem states that the tangent lines of a point conic form a line conic, and dually, the points of contact of a line conic form a point conic.[54]
Karl Georg Christian von Staudt defined a conic as the point set given by all the absolute points of apolarity that has absolute points. Von Staudt introduced this definition inGeometrie der Lage (1847) as part of his attempt to remove all metrical concepts from projective geometry.
Apolarity,π, of a projective planeP is aninvolutorybijection between the points and the lines ofP that preserves theincidence relation. Thus, a polarity associates a pointQ with a lineq byπ(Q) =q andπ(q) =Q. FollowingGergonne,q is called thepolar ofQ andQ thepole ofq.[55] Anabsolute point (orline) of a polarity is one which is incident with its polar (pole).[e]
A von Staudt conic in the real projective plane is equivalent to aSteiner conic.[56]
Constructions
No continuous arc of a conic can be constructed with straightedge and compass. However, there are several straightedge-and-compass constructions for any number of individual points on an arc.
One of them is based on the converse of Pascal's theorem, namely,if the points of intersection of opposite sides of a hexagon are collinear, then the six vertices lie on a conic. Specifically, given five points,A,B,C,D,E and a line passing throughE, sayEG, a pointF that lies on this line and is on the conic determined by the five points can be constructed. LetAB meetDE inL,BC meetEG inM and letCD meetLM atN. ThenAN meetsEG at the required pointF.[57] By varying the line throughE, as many additional points on the conic as desired can be constructed.
Parallelogram method for constructing an ellipse
Another method, based on Steiner's construction and which is useful in engineering applications, is the parallelogram method, where a conic is constructed point by point by means of connecting certain equally spaced points on a horizontal line and a vertical line.[58] Specifically, to construct the ellipse with equationx2/a2 +y2/b2 = 1, first construct the rectangleABCD with verticesA(a, 0),B(a, 2b),C(−a, 2b) andD(−a, 0). Divide the sideBC inton equal segments and use parallel projection, with respect to the diagonalAC, to form equal segments on sideAB (the lengths of these segments will beb/a times the length of the segments onBC). On the sideBC label the left-hand endpoints of the segments withA1 toAn starting atB and going towardsC. On the sideAB label the upper endpointsD1 toDn starting atA and going towardsB. The points of intersection,AAi ∩DDi for1 ≤i ≤n will be points of the ellipse betweenA andP(0,b). The labeling associates the lines of the pencil throughA with the lines of the pencil throughD projectively but not perspectively. The sought for conic is obtained by this construction since three pointsA,D andP and two tangents (the vertical lines atA andD) uniquely determine the conic. If another diameter (and its conjugate diameter) are used instead of the major and minor axes of the ellipse, a parallelogram that is not a rectangle is used in the construction, giving the name of the method. The association of lines of the pencils can be extended to obtain other points on the ellipse. The constructions for hyperbolas[59] and parabolas[60] are similar.
Yet another general method uses the polarity property to construct the tangent envelope of a conic (a line conic).[61]
In the complex geometry
In thecomplex coordinate planeC2, ellipses and hyperbolas are not distinct: one may consider a hyperbola as an ellipse with an imaginary axis length. For example, the ellipse becomes a hyperbola under the substitution geometrically a complex rotation, yielding. Thus there is a 2-way classification: ellipse/hyperbola and parabola. Extending the curves to thecomplex projective plane, this corresponds to intersecting theline at infinity in either 2 distinct points (corresponding to two asymptotes) or in 1 double point (corresponding to the axis of a parabola); thus the real hyperbola is a more suggestive real image for the complex ellipse/hyperbola, as it also has 2 (real) intersections with the line at infinity.
It can be proven that inCP2, two conic sections have four points in common (if one accounts formultiplicity), so there are between 1 and 4intersection points. The intersection possibilities are: four distinct points, two singular points and one double point, two double points, one singular point and one with multiplicity 3, one point with multiplicity 4. If any intersection point has multiplicity > 1, the two curves are said to betangent. If there is an intersection point of multiplicity at least 3, the two curves are said to beosculating. If there is only one intersection point, which has multiplicity 4, the two curves are said to besuperosculating.[62]
Furthermore, eachstraight line intersects each conic section twice. If the intersection point is double, the line is atangent line.Intersecting with the line at infinity, each conic section has two points at infinity. If these points are real, the curve is ahyperbola; if they are imaginary conjugates, it is anellipse; if there is only one double point, it is aparabola. If the points at infinity are thecyclic points[1:i: 0] and[1: –i: 0], the conic section is acircle. If the coefficients of a conic section are real, the points at infinity are either real orcomplex conjugate.
What should be considered as adegenerate case of a conic depends on the definition being used and the geometric setting for the conic section. There are some authors who define a conic as a two-dimensional nondegenerate quadric. With this terminology there are no degenerate conics (only degenerate quadrics), but we shall use the more traditional terminology and avoid that definition.
In the Euclidean plane, using the geometric definition, a degenerate case arises when the cutting plane passes through theapex of the cone.The degenerate conic is either: apoint, when the plane intersects the cone only at the apex; astraight line, when the plane is tangent to the cone (it contains exactly one generator of the cone); or a pair of intersecting lines (two generators of the cone).[63] These correspond respectively to the limiting forms of an ellipse, parabola, and a hyperbola.
If a conic in the Euclidean plane is being defined by the zeros of a quadratic equation (that is, as a quadric), then the degenerate conics are: theempty set, a point, or a pair of lines which may be parallel, intersect at a point, or coincide. The empty set case may correspond either to a pair ofcomplex conjugate parallel lines such as with the equation or to animaginary ellipse, such as with the equation An imaginary ellipse does not satisfy the general definition of adegeneracy, and is thus not normally considered as degenerated.[64] The two lines case occurs when the quadratic expression factors into two linear factors, the zeros of each giving a line. In the case that the factors are the same, the corresponding lines coincide and we refer to the line asadouble line (a line withmultiplicity 2) and this is the previous case of a tangent cutting plane.
In the real projective plane, since parallel lines meet at a point on the line at infinity, the parallel line case of the Euclidean plane can be viewed as intersecting lines. However, as the point of intersection is the apex of the cone, the cone itself degenerates to acylinder, i.e. with the apex at infinity. Other sections in this case are calledcylindric sections.[65] The non-degenerate cylindrical sections are ellipses (or circles).
When viewed from the perspective of the complex projective plane, the degenerate cases of a real quadric (i.e., the quadratic equation has real coefficients) can all be considered as a pair of lines, possibly coinciding. The empty set may be the line at infinity considered as a double line, a (real) point is the intersection of twocomplex conjugate lines and the other cases as previously mentioned.
To distinguish the degenerate cases from the non-degenerate cases (including the empty set with the latter) using matrix notation, letβ be the determinant of the 3 × 3matrix of the conic section—that is,β = (AC −B2/4)F +BED −CD2 −AE2/4; and letα =B2 − 4AC be the discriminant. Then the conic section is non-degenerate if and only ifβ ≠ 0. Ifβ= 0 we have a point whenα < 0, two parallel lines (possibly coinciding) whenα = 0, or two intersecting lines whenα > 0.[66]
A (non-degenerate) conic is completely determined byfive points in general position (no threecollinear) in a plane and the system of conics which pass through a fixed set of four points (again in a plane and no three collinear) is called apencil of conics.[67] The four common points are called thebase points of the pencil. Through any point other than a base point, there passes a single conic of the pencil. This concept generalizes apencil of circles.[68]
Intersecting two conics
The solutions to a system of two second degree equations in two variables may be viewed as the coordinates of the points of intersection of two generic conic sections.In particular two conics may possess none, two or four possibly coincident intersection points.An efficient method of locating these solutions exploits the homogeneousmatrix representation of conic sections, i.e. a 3 × 3symmetric matrix which depends on six parameters.
The procedure to locate the intersection points follows these steps, where the conics are represented by matrices:[69]
given the two conics and, consider the pencil of conics given by their linear combination
identify the homogeneous parameters which correspond to the degenerate conic of the pencil. This can be done by imposing the condition that and solving for and. These turn out to be the solutions of a third degree equation.
given the degenerate conic, identify the two, possibly coincident, lines constituting it.
intersect each identified line with either one of the two original conics.
the points of intersection will represent the solutions to the initial equation system.
Generalizations
Conics may be defined over other fields (that is, in otherpappian geometries). However, some care must be used when the field hascharacteristic 2, as some formulas can not be used. For example, the matrix representations usedabove require division by 2.
A generalization of a non-degenerate conic in a projective plane is anoval. An oval is a point set that has the following properties, which are held by conics: 1) any line intersects an oval in none, one or two points, 2) at any point of the oval there exists a unique tangent line.
Generalizing the focus properties of conics to the case where there are more than two foci produces sets calledgeneralized conics.
The intersection of anelliptic cone with a sphere is aspherical conic, which shares many properties with planar conics.
In other areas of mathematics
The classification into elliptic, parabolic, and hyperbolic is pervasive in mathematics, and often divides a field into sharply distinct subfields. The classification mostly arises due to the presence of a quadratic form (in two variables this corresponds to the associateddiscriminant), but can also correspond to eccentricity.
Quadratic forms over the reals are classified bySylvester's law of inertia, namely by their positive index, zero index, and negative index: a quadratic form in variables can be converted to adiagonal form, as where the number of +1 coefficients, is the positive index, the number of −1 coefficients, is the negative index, and the remaining variables are the zero index so In two variables the non-zero quadratic forms are classified as:
— positive-definite (the negative is also included), corresponding to ellipses,
— degenerate, corresponding to parabolas, and
— indefinite, corresponding to hyperbolas.
In two variables quadratic forms are classified by discriminant, analogously to conics, but in higher dimensions the more useful classification is asdefinite, (all positive or all negative),degenerate, (some zeros), orindefinite (mix of positive and negative but no zeros). This classification underlies many that follow.
Partial differential equations (PDEs) ofsecond order are classified at each point as elliptic, parabolic, or hyperbolic, accordingly as their second order terms correspond to an elliptic, parabolic, or hyperbolic quadratic form. The behavior and theory of these different types of PDEs are strikingly different – representative examples is that thePoisson equation is elliptic, theheat equation is parabolic, and thewave equation is hyperbolic.
Real Möbius transformations (elements ofPSL2(R) or its 2-fold cover,SL2(R)) areclassified as elliptic, parabolic, or hyperbolic accordingly as their half-trace is or mirroring the classification by eccentricity.
^The empty set is included as a degenerate conic, since it may arise as a solution of this equation.
^According toPlutarch, this solution was rejected by Plato on the grounds that it could not be achieved using only straightedge and compass, however this interpretation of Plutarch's statement has come under criticism.Boyer 2004, p.14, footnote 14.
^This form of the equation does not generalize to fields of characteristic two.
^Consider finding the midpoint of a line segment with one endpoint on the line at infinity.
^Coxeter and several other authors use the term 'self-conjugate' instead of 'absolute'.
^Whitworth, William Allen.Trilinear Coordinates and Other Methods of Modern Analytical Geometry of Two Dimensions, Forgotten Books, 2012 (orig. Deighton, Bell, and Co., 1866), p. 203.
^Sidoli, Nathan; Brummelen, Glen Van (2013-10-30).From Alexandria, Through Baghdad: Surveys and Studies in the Ancient Greek and Medieval Islamic Mathematical Sciences in Honor of J.L. Berggren. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 110.ISBN978-3-642-36736-6.
^Waerden, Bartel L. van der (2013-06-29).A History of Algebra: From al-Khwārizmī to Emmy Noether. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 29.ISBN978-3-642-51599-6.
^Jacob Steiner's Vorlesungen über synthetische Geometrie, B. G. Teubner, Leipzig 1867 (from Google Books:(German) Part II follows Part I) Part II, pg. 96
^Wilczynski, E. J. (1916), "Some remarks on the historical development and the future prospects of the differential geometry of plane curves",Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.,22 (7):317–329,doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1916-02785-6.
^Korn, G. A., &Korn, T. M.,Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers: Definitions, Theorems, and Formulas for Reference and Review (Mineola, NY:Dover Publications, 1961),p. 42.
Eves, Howard (1963),A Survey of Geometry (Volume One), Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Glaeser, Georg; Stachel, Hellmuth; Odehnal, Boris (2016),The Universe of Conics: From the ancient Greeks to 21st century developments, Berlin: Springer
