This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Laos–United States relations" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(August 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Laos | United States |
|---|---|
Relations betweenLaos and theUnited States officially began when the United States opened alegation in Laos in 1950, when Laos was a semi-autonomous state withinFrench Indochina. These relations were maintained after Laos' independence in October 1953.

TheSecond Indochina War (1955–1975) between the United States andcommunist forces in Indochina took place partially on Lao territory. The US became heavily involved, in a secret covert war, during theLaotian Civil War of 1953–1975, backing the Royal Lao government and theKingdom of Laos, andHmong people against thePathet Lao and the supportingVietnam People's Army forces.[citation needed]
Although the U.S. and Laos never severed diplomatic relations following the end of the war in 1975 and the communist Pathet Lao takeover of Laos with the support ofNorth Vietnam and the Vietnam People's Army, U.S.-Lao relations deteriorated due toideological differences. The relationship remained cool until 1982, when efforts at improvement began. The two countries restored full diplomatic relations in 1992 with a return to ambassadorial-level representation.[1]
In 1997 theLaos Memorial was established and dedicated inArlington National Cemetery in Virginia to officially recognize the U.S. clandestine and secret war in Laos and to honor Laotian and Hmong veterans, and their advisers, who served in Laos during the Vietnam War.[2]
The government of Laos has been accused by the U.S.,United Nations and human rights organizations of committing genocide against that country's Hmong ethnic minority.[3]
Some Hmong groups fought as CIA-backed units on the Royalist side in the Laos civil war. After the Pathet Lao took over the country in 1975, the conflict continued in isolated pockets. In 1977 a communist newspaper promised the party would hunt down the "American collaborators" and their families "to the last root".[4]
Amnesty International,The Centre for Public Policy Analysis,Human Rights Watch, the Lao Human Rights Council,Lao Veterans of America, and other non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and advocates, includingVang Pobzeb,Kerry and Kay Danes, and others, have provided research and information about theMarxist,Pathet Lao government of Laos' serious human rights violations against Laotian political and religiousdissidents and opposition groups, including many of theHmong people. Amnesty International and The Centre for Public Policy Analysis and other NGOs have researched and provided significant reports about ongoinghuman rights violations in Laos by theLao People's Army andVietnam People's Army including: the arrest and imprisonment of civic and opposition leaders includingSombath Somphone, military attacks,rape, abduction,torture,extrajudicial killing,religious persecution, and starvation of Laotian and Hmong civilians seeking to fleepersecution by Pathet Lao military and security forces.[5][6][7]
TheU.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom has previously designated the communist government of Laos aCountry of Particular Concern (CPC) forreligious freedom violations and has on numerous occasions placed the government of Laos on a special watch list for its serious persecution of minority Laotian and HmongChristians as well as independentAnimist andBuddhist believers. The Lao People's Army and its police and security forces have been involved in human rights violations andreligious persecution in Laos.[citation needed]
As many as 200,000 Hmong went into exile in Thailand, with many ending up in the USA. A number of Hmong fighters hid out in mountains inXiangkhouang Province for many years, with a remnant emerging from the jungle in 2003.[4]
In 1989, theUnited Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), with the support of the United States government, instituted theComprehensive Plan of Action, a program to stem the tide ofIndochinese refugees from Laos, Vietnam, and Cambodia. Under the plan, the status of the refugees was to be evaluated through a screening process. Recognized asylum seekers were to be given resettlement opportunities, while the remaining refugees were to be repatriated under guarantee of safety.
After talks with the UNHCR and the Thai government, Laos agreed to repatriate the 60,000 Lao refugees living in Thailand, including several thousand Hmong people. Very few of the Lao refugees, however, were willing to return voluntarily.[8] Pressure to resettle the refugees grew as the Thai government worked to close its remaining refugee camps. While some Hmong people returned to Laos voluntarily, with development assistance from UNHCR, allegations of forced repatriation surfaced.[9] Of those Hmong who did return to Laos, some quickly escaped back to Thailand, describing discrimination and brutal treatment at the hands of Lao authorities.[10]In 1993, Vue Mai, a former Hmong soldier who had been recruited by the U.S. Embassy inBangkok to return to Laos as proof of the repatriation program's success, disappeared inVientiane. According to the U.S. Committee for Refugees, he was arrested by Lao security forces and was never seen again.
Following the Vue Mai incident, debate over the Hmong's planned repatriation to Laos intensified greatly, especially in the U.S., where it drew strong opposition from many Democratic and moderate andAmerican conservatives Republicans as well as somehuman rights advocates, including Philip Smith ofThe Centre for Public Policy Analysis and theLao Veterans of America. In an October 23, 1995National Review article,Michael Johns, the formerHeritage Foundation foreign policy expert andRepublicanWhite House aide, labeled the Hmong's repatriation aClinton administration "betrayal," describing the Hmong as a people "who have spilled their blood in defense of American geopolitical interests."[11] Debate on the issue escalated quickly. In an effort to halt the planned repatriation, the Republican-ledU.S. Senate andU.S. House of Representatives both appropriated funds for the remaining Thailand-based Hmong to be immediately resettled in the U.S.; Clinton, however, responded by promising a veto of the legislation.
In their opposition of the repatriation plans, key Democrats as well as Republicans also challenged the Clinton administration's position that the Laotian government was not systematically violating Hmong human rights. U.S. RepresentativeSteve Gunderson (R-WI), for instance, told a Hmong gathering: "I do not enjoy standing up and saying to my government that you are not telling the truth, but if that is necessary to defend truth and justice, I will do that."[11] Republicans also called several Congressional hearings on alleged persecution of the Hmong in Laos in an apparent attempt to generate further support for their opposition to the Hmong's repatriation to Laos.
Although some accusations of forced repatriation were denied,[12] thousands of Hmong people refused to return to Laos. In 1996, as the deadline for the closure of Thai refugee camps approached, and under mounting political pressure, the U.S. agreed to resettle Hmong refugees who passed a new screening process.[13] Around 5,000 Hmong people who were not resettled at the time of the camp closures sought asylum atWat Tham Krabok, a Buddhist monastery in central Thailand where more than 10,000 Hmong refugees were already living. The Thai government attempted to repatriate these refugees, but the Wat Tham Krabok Hmong refused to leave and the Lao government refused to accept them, claiming they were involved in theillegal drug trade and were of non-Lao origin.[14]
In 2003, following threats of forcible removal by the Thai government, the U.S., in a significant victory for the Hmong, agreed to accept 15,000 of the refugees.[15] Several thousand Hmong people, fearing forced repatriation to Laos if they were not accepted for resettlement in the U.S., fled the camp to live elsewhere within Thailand where a sizable Hmong population has been present since the 19th century.[16]
In 2004 and 2005, thousands of Hmong fled from the jungles of Laos to a temporary refugee camp in the Thai province ofPhetchabun.[17] These Hmong refugees, many of whom are descendants of the former-CIA Secret Army and their relatives, claim that they have been attacked by both the Lao and Vietnamese military forces operating inside Laos as recently as June 2006. The refugees claim that attacks against them have continued almost unabated since the war officially ended in 1975, and have become more intense in recent years.
Lending further support to earlier claims that the government of Laos was persecuting the Hmong, filmmaker Rebecca Sommer documented first-hand accounts in her documentary,Hunted Like Animals,[18] and in a comprehensive report which includes summaries of claims made by the refugees and was submitted to the U.N. in May 2006.[19]
The European Union,[20] UNHCHR, and international groups have since spoken out about the forced repatriation.[20][21][22][23] The Thai foreign ministry has said that it will halt deportation of Hmong refugees held in Detention Centers Nong Khai, while talks are underway to resettle them inAustralia,Canada, theNetherlands and the United States.[24]
For the time being, countries willing to resettle the refugees are hindered to proceed with immigration and settlement procedures because the Thai administration does not grant them access to the refugees. Plans to resettle additional Hmong refugees in the U.S. have been complicated by provisions of President George W. Bush'sPatriot Act andReal ID Act, under which Hmong veterans of the Secret War, who fought on the side of the United States, are classified as terrorists because of their historical involvement in armed conflict.[25]
On December 27, 2009,The New York Times reported that the Thai military was preparing to forcibly return 4,000 Hmong asylum seekers to Laos by the end of the year:[26] the BBC later reported that repatriations had started.[27] Both United States and United Nations officials have protested this action. Outside government representatives have not been allowed to interview this group over the last three years.Médecins Sans Frontières has refused to assist the Hmong refugees because of what they have called "increasingly restrictive measures" taken by the Thai military.[28] The Thai military jammed all cellular phone reception and disallowed any foreign journalists from the Hmong camps.[27]
Accounting forAmericans missing in Laos from the Vietnam War has been a special focus of the bilateral relationship. Since the late 1980s,joint U.S. and Lao teams have conducted a series of excavations and investigations of sites related to cases of Americans missing in Laos.
Narcotics interdiction activities are also an important part of the bilateral relationship. The United States and Laos cooperate closely onopium crop control projects that have helped to bring about a 96% decline inopium poppy cultivation, from 42,000 hectares in 1989 to 1700 hectares in 2006. Laos, however, remains on the U.S. list of major opium producers. U.S.-sponsored demand reduction programs have increased Laos' capacity to treat both narcotic andamphetamineaddiction. The U.S. also provides law enforcement assistance to help contend with the rapid growth inmethamphetamine abuse and crime that has occurred in Laos since 2003.
The U.S. government provided more than $13.4 million in foreign assistance to Laos in FY 2006, in areas includingunexploded ordnance clearance and removal, health andavian influenza, education, economic development, andgovernance.
In December 2004, despite significant bipartisan opposition in the U.S. Congress and Lao- and Hmong-American communityGeorge W Bush signed into law a bill extending normal trade relations to Laos. Bush was criticized by many fellow Republicans in Congress, including CongressmanMark Andrew Green and CongressmanGeorge Radanovich for this move given accusations of serious human rights violations in Laos against theHmong people. In February 2005, abilateral trade agreement (BTA) between the two countries entered into force. There has been a consequent rise in Lao exports to the United States, although the volume of trade remains small in absolute terms. Bilateral trade reached $15.7 million in 2006, compared with $8.9 million in 2003. The Lao Government is working to implement the provisions of the BTA.
| Term started | Term ended | U.S. Ambassador |
| August 1950 | December 1950 | Paul L. Guest |
| 29 December 1950 | 1 November 1954 | Donald R. Heath |
| 1 November 1954 | 27 April 1956 | Charles W. Yost |
| 12 October 1956 | 8 February 1958 | J. Graham Parsons |
| 9 April 1958 | 21 June 1960 | Horace H. Smith |
| 25 July 1960 | 28 June 1962 | Winthrop G. Brown |
| 25 July 1962 | 1 December 1964 | Leonard S. Unger |
| 23 December 1964 | 18 March 1969 | William H. Sullivan |
| 24 July 1969 | 23 April 1973 | G. McMurtrie Godley |
| 20 September 1973 | 12 April 1975 | Charles S. Whitehouse |
| August 1975 | March 1978 | Thomas J. Corcoran |
| March 1978 | September 1979 | George B. Roberts, Jr. |
| September 1979 | October 1981 | Leo J. Moser |
| November 1981 | November 1983 | William W. Thomas, Jr. |
| November 1983 | August 1986 | Theresa A. Tull |
| August 1986 | August 1989 | Harriet W. Isom |
| August 1989 | 26 July 1993 | Charles B. Salmon, Jr. |
| 8 January 1994 | 20 August 1996 | Victor L. Tomseth |
| 5 September 1996 | 14 June 1999 | Wendy Chamberlin |
| 18 September 2001 | 21 April 2004 | Douglas A. Hartwick |
| September 4, 2004 | May 2007 | Patricia M. Haslach |
| June 22, 2007 | August 22, 2010 | Ravic R. Huso |
| November 15, 2010 | August 8, 2013 | Karen B. Stewart |
| September 16, 2013 | September 21, 2016 | Daniel A. Clune |
| November 2, 2016 | January 26, 2020 | Rena Bitter |
| February 7, 2020 | September 1, 2023 | Peter Haymond |
| September 1, 2023 | February 6, 2024 | Michelle Y. Outlaw (Chargé d'Affaires) |
| February 6, 2024 | Incumbent | Heather Variava |