| Part ofa series on |
| Weather |
|---|
 Weather portal |
Lake-effect snow is produced during cooler atmospheric conditions when a coldair mass moves across long expanses of warmerlake water. The lower layer of air, heated by the lake water, picks upwater vapor from the lake and rises through colder air. The vapor then freezes and is deposited on theleeward (downwind) shores.[1]
The same effect also occurs over bodies ofsaline water, when it is termedocean-effect orbay-effect snow. The effect is enhanced when the moving air mass is uplifted by theorographic influence of higher elevations on the downwind shores. This uplifting can produce narrow but very intense bands ofprecipitation, which deposit at a rate of many inches of snow each hour, often resulting in a large amount of totalsnowfall.
The areas affected by lake-effect and parallel "ocean-effect" phenomena are calledsnowbelts. These include areas east of theGreat Lakes in North America, the west coasts of northern Japan,Lake Baikal in Russia, and areas near theGreat Salt Lake,Black Sea,Caspian Sea,Baltic Sea,Adriatic Sea, theNorth Sea and more.
Lake-effect blizzards are theblizzard-like conditions resulting from lake-effect snow. Under certain conditions, strong winds can accompany lake-effect snows creating blizzard-like conditions; however, the duration of the event is often slightly less than that required for a blizzard warning in both the U.S. and Canada.[2]
If the air temperature is low enough to keep the precipitation frozen, it falls as lake-effect snow. If not, then it falls aslake-effect rain. For lake-effect rain or snow to form, the air moving across the lake must be significantly cooler than the surface air (which is likely to be near the temperature of the water surface). Specifically, the air temperature at an altitude where theair pressure is 850millibars (85 kPa) (roughly 1.5 kilometers or 5,000 feet vertically) should be 13 °C (23 °F) lower than the temperature of the air at the surface. Lake-effect occurring when the air at 850millibars (85 kPa) is much colder than the water surface can producethundersnow, snow showers accompanied bylightning andthunder (caused by larger amounts of energy available from the increased instability), and, on very rare occasions, tornados.[3]
Some key elements are required to form lake-effect precipitation and which determine its characteristics: instability, fetch, wind shear, upstream moisture, upwind lakes, synoptic (large)-scale forcing, orography/topography, and snow or ice cover.
A temperature difference of approximately 13 °C (23 °F) between the lake temperature and the height in the atmosphere (about 1,500 m or 5,000 ft at which barometric pressure measures 850 mbar or 85 kPa) provides for absolute instability and allows vigorous heat and moisture transportation vertically. Atmosphericlapse rate and convective depth are directly affected by both the mesoscale lake environment and the synoptic environment; a deeper convective depth with increasingly steep lapse rates and a suitable moisture level allow for thicker, taller lake-effect precipitation clouds and naturally a much greater precipitation rate.[4]
The distance that an air mass travels over a body of water is called fetch. Because most lakes are irregular in shape, different angular degrees of travel yield different distances; typically, a fetch of at least 100 km (60 mi) is required to produce lake-effect precipitation. Generally, the larger the fetch, the more precipitation produced. Larger fetches provide the boundary layer with more time to become saturated with water vapor and for heat energy to move from the water to the air. As the air mass reaches the other side of the lake, the engine of rising and cooling water vapor pans itself out in the form of condensation and falls as snow, usually within 40 km (25 mi) of the lake, but sometimes up to about 150 km (100 mi).[5]
Directionalshear is one of the most important factors governing the development of squalls; environments with weak directional shear typically produce more intense squalls than those with higher shear levels. If directional shear between the surface and the height in the atmosphere at which the barometric pressure measures 700 mb (70 kPa) is greater than 60°, nothing more than flurries can be expected. If the directional shear between the body of water and the vertical height at which the pressure measures 700 mb (70 kPa) is between 30° and 60°, weak lake-effect bands are possible. In environments where the shear is less than 30°, strong, well organized bands can be expected.[6]
Speed shear is less critical but should be relatively uniform. The wind-speed difference between the surface and vertical height at which the pressure reads 700 mb (70 kPa) should be no greater than 40 knots (74 km/h) so as to prevent the upper portions of the band from shearing off. However, assuming the surface to 700 mb (70 kPa) winds are uniform, a faster overall velocity works to transport moisture more quickly from the water, and the band then travels much farther inland.[6]
A lower upstream relative humidity lake effect makes condensation, clouds, and precipitation more difficult to form. The opposite is true if the upstream moisture has a high relative humidity, allowing lake-effect condensation, cloud, and precipitation to form more readily and in a greater quantity.[7]
Any large body of water upwind impacts lake-effect precipitation to the lee of a downwind lake by adding moisture or pre-existing lake-effect bands, which can reintensify over the downwind lake. Upwind lakes do not always lead to an increase of precipitation downwind.[8]
Vorticity advection aloft and large upscale ascent help increase mixing and the convective depth, while cold air advection lowers the temperature and increases instability.[9]
Typically, lake-effect precipitation increases with elevation to the lee of the lake as topographic forcing squeezes out precipitation and dries out the squall much faster.[10]
As a lake gradually freezes over, its ability to produce lake-effect precipitation decreases for two reasons. Firstly, the open ice-free liquid surface area of the lake shrinks. This reduces fetch distances. Secondly, the water temperature nears freezing, reducing overall latent heat energy available to produce squalls. To end the production of lake-effect precipitation, a complete freeze is often not necessary.[11]
Even when precipitation is not produced, cold air passing over warmer water may produce cloud cover. Fast-moving mid-latitude cyclones, known asAlberta clippers, often cross the Great Lakes. After the passage of a cold front, winds tend to switch to the northwest, and a frequent pattern is for a long-lastinglow-pressure area to form over theCanadian Maritimes, which may pull cold northwestern air across the Great Lakes for a week or more, commonly identified with the negative phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). Since the prevailing winter winds tend to be colder than the water for much of the winter, the southeastern shores of the lakes are almost constantly overcast, leading to the use of the term "the Great Gray Funk" as a synonym for winter.[citation needed] These areas allegedly contain populations that suffer from high rates ofseasonal affective disorder, a type of psychological depression thought to be caused by lack of light.[12][citation needed]
Cold winds in the winter typically prevail from the northwest in the Great Lakes region, producing the most dramatic lake-effect snowfalls on the southern and eastern shores of theGreat Lakes. This lake effect results in much greater snowfall amounts on the southern and eastern shores compared to the northern and western shores of the Great Lakes.
The most affected areas include theUpper Peninsula of Michigan;Northern New York andCentral New York; particularly theTug Hill Region,Western New York;Northwestern Pennsylvania;Northeastern Ohio;southwestern Ontario and central Ontario; Northeastern Illinois (along the shoreline of Lake Michigan); northwestern and north centralIndiana (mostly betweenGary andElkhart); northernWisconsin (near Lake Superior); andWest Michigan.[13]
Lake-effect snows on the Tug Hill plateau (east ofLake Ontario) can frequently set daily records for snowfall in the United States. Tug Hill receives, typically, over 20 feet (240 in; 610 cm) of snow each winter.[14] The snowiest portions of the Tug Hill, near the junction of the towns ofMontague,Osceola,Redfield, andWorth, average over 300 inches (760 cm) of snow annually.[15]
From February 3–12, 2007, a lake-effect snow event left 141 inches (358 cm) of snow in 10 days at North Redfield on the Tug Hill Plateau.[16][17] Other examples major prolonged lake effect snowstorms on the Tug Hill include December 27, 2001, - January 1, 2002, when 127 inches (320 cm) of snow fell in six days in Montague, January 10–14, 1997, when 110.5 inches (281 cm) of snow fell in five days in North Redfield, and January 15–22, 1940, when over eight feet of snow fell in eight days at Barnes Corners.[17]
Syracuse, New York, directly south of the Tug Hill Plateau, receives significant lake-effect snow from Lake Ontario, and averages 115.6 inches (294 cm) of snow per year, which is enough snowfall to be considered one of the "snowiest" large cities in America.[18][19]
Lake Erie produces a similar effect for a zone stretching from the eastern suburbs ofCleveland throughErie toBuffalo.[20] Remnants of lake-effect snows from Lake Erie have been observed to reach as far south asGarrett County, Maryland, and as far east asGeneva, New York.[21] Because it is not as deep as the other lakes, Erie warms rapidly in the spring and summer, and is frequently the only Great Lake to freeze over in winter.[22] Once frozen, the resulting ice cover alleviates lake-effect snow downwind of the lake. Based on stable isotope evidence from lake sediment coupled with historical records of increasing lake-effect snow, global warming has been predicted to result in a further increase in lake-effect snow.[23]
A very largesnowbelt in the United States exists on theUpper Peninsula of Michigan, near the cities ofHoughton,Marquette, andMunising. These areas typically receive 250–300 inches (635–762 cm) of snow each season.[24] For comparison, on the western shore,Duluth, Minnesota receives 78 inches (198 cm) per season.[25]
Western Michigan, westernNorthern Lower Michigan, andNorthern Indiana can get heavy lake-effect snows as winds pass over Lake Michigan and deposit snows overMuskegon,Traverse City,Grand Rapids,Kalamazoo,New Carlisle,South Bend, andElkhart, but these snows abate significantly beforeLansing orFort Wayne. When winds become northerly or aligned between 330° and 030°, a single band of lake-effect snow may form, which extends down the length of Lake Michigan. This long fetch often produces a very intense, yet localized, area of heavy snowfall, affecting cities such asLa Porte andGary.[26]
Because Southwestern Ontario is surrounded by water on three sides, many parts of Southwestern and Central Ontario get a large part of their winter snow from lake-effect snow.[27] This region is notorious for the whiteouts that can suddenly reduce highway visibility on North America's busiest highway (Ontario Highway 401)[28] from clear to zero. The region most commonly affected spans fromPort Stanley in the west, theBruce Peninsula in the north,Niagara-on-the-Lake to the east, andFort Erie to the south. The heaviest accumulations usually happen in the Bruce Peninsula, which is betweenLake Huron and Georgian Bay. So long as the Great Lakes are not frozen over, the only time the Bruce Peninsula does not get lake-effect snow is when the wind is directly from the south.
The southern and southeastern sides of theGreat Salt Lake receive significant lake-effect snow. Since the Great Salt Lake never freezes, the lake effect can influence the weather along theWasatch Front year-round. The lake effect largely contributes to the 55–80 inches (140–203 cm) annual snowfall amounts recorded south and east of the lake, and in average snowfall reaching 500 inches (13 m) in theWasatch Range. The snow, which is often very light and dry because of the semiarid climate, is referred to as the "Greatest Snow on Earth" in the mountains. Lake-effect snow contributes to roughly six to eight snowfalls per year inSalt Lake City, with about 10% of the city's precipitation being contributed by the phenomenon.[29]
On one occasion in December 2016, lake-effect snow fell in centralMississippi from a lake band offRoss Barnett Reservoir.[30]
TheWest Coast occasionally experiences ocean-effect showers, usually in the form of rain at lower elevations south of about the mouth of theColumbia River. These occur whenever an Arctic air mass from western Canada is drawn westward out over the Pacific Ocean, typically by way of theFraser Valley, returning shoreward around a center of low pressure. Cold air flowing southwest from the Fraser Valley can also pick up moisture over theStrait of Georgia andStrait of Juan de Fuca, then rise over the northeastern slopes of theOlympic Mountains, producing heavy, localized snow betweenPort Angeles andSequim, as well as areas inKitsap County and thePuget Sound region.[31]
While snow of any type is very rare in Florida, the phenomenon of gulf-effect snow has been observed along the northern coast of theGulf of Mexico a few times in history. More recently, "ocean-effect" snow occurred on January 24, 2003, when wind off the Atlantic, combined with air temperatures in the 30 °F range, brought snow flurries briefly to the Atlantic Coast of northern Florida seen in the air as far south asCape Canaveral.[32]
Because the southern Black Sea is relatively warm (around 13 °C or 55 °F at the beginning of winter, typically 10 to 6 °C or 50 to 43 °F by the end), sufficiently cold air aloft can create significant snowfalls in a relatively short period of time.[33] Furthermore, cold air, when it arrives to the region, tends to move slowly, creating days and sometimes weeks of occasional lake-effect snowfall.[33]
The most populous city in the region,Istanbul, is very prone to lake-effect snow and this weather phenomenon occurs almost every winter, despite winter averages of 5 °C (41 °F), comparable toParis.[34] On multiple occasions, lake-effect snowfall events have lasted for more than a week, and official single-storm snow depth totals have exceeded 80 centimeters (2.6 ft; 31 in) downtown and 104 centimeters (3.41 ft; 41 in) around the city.[35][34][36] Earlier, unofficial measurements are often higher, due to the relative dearth of sufficiently old weather stations in the region; some sources claim up to 4 meters (13 ft; 160 in) of snowfall during the blizzard of March 1987.[37]
Meanwhile, snowfall in mountainous provinces in this region is amplified byorographic effect, often resulting in snowfall of several meters, especially at higher elevations.
In Northern Europe, cold, dry air masses from Russia can blow over theBaltic Sea and cause heavy snow squalls on areas of the southern and eastern coasts of Sweden, as well as on the Danish island ofBornholm, the east coast ofJutland and the northern coast ofPoland. For the northern parts of the Baltic Sea, this happens mainly in the early winter, since it freezes later. Southeast Norway can also experience heavy sea snow events with east-north-easterly winds. Especially, coastal areas fromKragerø toKristiansand have had incredible snow depths in the past with intense persistent snowbands fromSkagerak (the coastal city of Arendal recorded 280 cm (110 in) in a single week in late February 2007).[38] Although Fennoscandia is lined with an abundance of lakes, this type of snowfall is rare in these, due to the shallow freshwater freezing early in the cold interiors. One notable exception happened in the middle of May 2008, asLeksand on the since-long unfrozen lake ofSiljan got 30 cm (12 in) on the ground.[39]
The Sea of Japan creates snowfall in the mountainous western Japanese prefectures ofNiigata andNagano, parts of which are known collectively assnow country (Yukiguni). In addition to Japan, much of maritime Korea and theShandong Peninsula experience these conditions.[40]
Strong winds and a very large, deep lake enhance snowfall aroundLake Baikal in the fall; however, nearly the entire surface of the lake freezes from January until Spring, precluding lake-effect snow.[41]
Moving of polar or Siberian high-pressure centers along Caspian Sea regarding to relatively warmer water of this sea can make heavy snowfalls in the northern coast of Iran. Several blizzards have been reported in this region during the last decades. In February 2014, heavy snowfall reached 200 cm (79 in) on the coastline inGilan andMazandaran provinces of Iran. The heaviest snowfall was reported inAbkenar village nearAnzali Lagoon.[42][43][44][45]
![IRIMO[46] radar animation of lake effect snow in southern coast of Caspian Sea in the north of Iran](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=https%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aCaspian-lake-effect.gif)
In the United Kingdom, easterly winds bringing cold continental air across theNorth Sea can lead to a similar phenomenon. Locally, it is also known as "lake-effect snow" despite the snow coming in from the sea rather than a lake.[47] Similarly during a north-westerly wind, snow showers can form coming in from theLiverpool Bay, coming down theCheshire gap, causing snowfall in theWest Midlands—this formation resulted in the white Christmas of 2004 in the area, and most recently the heavy snowfall of 8 December 2017 and 30 January 2019.[48][49]
The best-known example occurred inJanuary 1987, when record-breaking cold air (associated with an upper low) moved across the North Sea towards the UK. The result was over 2 ft of snow for coastal areas, leading to communities being cut off for over a week. The latest of these events to affect Britain's east coast occurred on November 30, 2017; February 28, 2018; and March 17, 2018; in connection with the2018 Great Britain and Ireland cold wave.[50] The second event of winter 2017/18 was particularly severe, with up to 27.5 inches (70 cm) falling in total over the 27th–28th.[51]
Similarly, northerly winds blowing across the relatively warm waters of the English Channel during cold spells can bring significant snowfall to the French region of Normandy, where snow drifts exceeding 10 ft (3 m) were measured in March 2013.[52]
![NetWeather[53] radar image showing "lake-effect" snow over Kent and northeast England](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=https%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aLakeeffect.png)
Warnings about lake-effect snow:
{{cite journal}}:Cite journal requires|journal= (help)