This article includes a list ofgeneral references, butit lacks sufficient correspondinginline citations. Please help toimprove this article byintroducing more precise citations.(December 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

JIS X 0208 is a 2-bytecharacter set specified as aJapanese Industrial Standard, containing 6879 graphic characters suitable for writing text, place names, personal names, and so forth in theJapanese language. The official title of the current standard is7-bit and 8-bit double byte coded KANJI sets for information interchange (7ビット及び8ビットの2バイト情報交換用符号化漢字集合,Nana-Bitto Oyobi Hachi-Bitto no Ni-Baito Jōhō Kōkan'yō Fugōka Kanji Shūgō). It was originally established asJIS C 6226 in 1978, and has been revised in 1983, 1990, and 1997. It is also calledCode page 952 by IBM. The 1978 version is also calledCode page 955 by IBM.

The character set JIS X 0208 establishes is primarily for the purpose ofinformation interchange (情報交換,jōhō kōkan) between data processing systems and the devices connected to them, or mutually between data communication systems. This character set can be used for data processing and text processing.

Partial implementations of the character set are not considered compatible. Because there are places where such things have happened as the original drafting committee of the first standard taking care to separate characters between level 1 and level 2 and the second standard then shuffling some variant characters (異体字,itaiji) between the levels, at least in the first and second standards, it is conjectured that non-kanji and level 1-only implementation Japanese computer systems were at one time considered for development. However, such implementations have never been specified as compatible, though examples such as the earlyNEC PC-9801 did exist.^[1]

Even though there are provisions in the JIS X 0208:1997 standard concerning compatibility, at the present time, it is generally considered that this standard neither certifies compatibility nor is it an official manufacturing standard that amounts to a declaration of self-compatibility.^[2] Consequently,de facto, JIS X 0208-"compatible" products are not considered to exist. Terminology such as "conformant" (準拠,junkyo) and "support" (対応,taiō) is included in JIS X 0208, but the semantics of these terms vary from person to person.

The first encoding byte corresponds to the row or cell number plus 0x20, or 32 in decimal (see below). Hence, the code set starting with 0x21 has a row number of 1, and its cell 1 has a continuation byte of 0x21 (or 33), and so forth.

For lead bytes used for characters other thankanji, links are provided to charts on this page listing the characters encoded under that lead byte. For lead bytes used for kanji, links are provided to the appropriate section ofWiktionary's kanji index.

Some vendors use slightly different Unicode mapping for this set than the one below. For example,Microsoft maps kuten 1-29 (JIS 0x213D) to U+2015 (Horizontal Bar),^[3] whereasApple maps it to U+2014 (Em Dash).^[4] Similarly, Microsoft maps kuten 1-61 (JIS 0x215D) to U+FF0D^[3] (the fullwidth form of U+002D Hyphen-Minus), and Apple maps it to U+2212 (Minus Sign).^[4]Unicode mapping of the wave dash also differs between vendors. See the cells with footnotes below.

ASCII andJISCII punctuation (shown here with a yellow background) may use alternative mappings to theHalfwidth and Fullwidth Forms block if used in an encoding which combines JIS X 0208 withASCII or withJIS X 0201, such asShift JIS,EUC-JP orISO 2022-JP.

Most of the characters in this set were added in 1983, except for characters 0x2221–0x222E (kuten 2-1 through 2-14, or the first line of the chart below), which were included in the original 1978 version of the standard.

This set includes a subset of theISO 646 invariant set (and therefore also a subset of bothASCII and theJIS X 0201 Roman set), minus punctuation and symbols, comprisingwestern Arabic numerals and both cases of theBasic Latin alphabet. Characters in this set may use alternative Unicode mappings to theHalfwidth and Fullwidth Forms block if used in an encoding which combines JIS X 0208 with ASCII or with JIS X 0201, such asEUC-JP,Shift JIS orISO 2022-JP.

Comparerow 3 of KPS 9566, which this row exactly matches. Compare and contrastrow 3 of KS X 1001 andof GB 2312, which include their entire national variants ofISO 646 in this row, rather than only the alphanumeric subset.

This row contains JapaneseHiragana.

Comparerow 4 of GB 2312, which matches this row. Compare and contrast row 10of KPS 9566 andof KS X 1001, which use the same layout, but in a different row.

This row contains JapaneseKatakana.

Comparerow 5 of GB 2312, which matches this row. Compare and contrast row 11of KPS 9566 andof KS X 1001, which use the same layout, but in a different row. Contrast the considerably different Katakana layout used byJIS X 0201.

This row contains basic support for the modernGreek alphabet, without diacritics or thefinal sigma.

Comparerow 6 of GB 2312 and GB 12345 androw 6 of KPS 9566, which include the same Greek letters in the same layout, althoughGB 12345 adds vertical presentation forms and KPS 9566 adds Roman numerals. Compare and contrastrow 5 of KS X 1001, which offsets the Greek letters to include the Roman numerals first.

This row contains the modernRussian alphabet and is not necessarily sufficient for representing other forms of theCyrillic script.

Comparerow 7 of GB 2312, which matches this row. Compare and contrastrow 12 of KS X 1001 androw 5 of KPS 9566, which use the same layout (but in a different row).

All characters in this set were added in 1983, and were not present in the original 1978 revision of the standard.

Rows 9 through 15 of the JIS X 0208 standard are left empty.

However, the following layout for row 13, first introduced byNEC, is a common extension. It is used (with minor variations, noted in footnotes) byWindows-932^[3] (which is matched by theWHATWG Encoding Standard used byHTML5), by the PostScript variant (but, sinceKanjiTalk version 7, not the regular variant)^[5] ofMacJapanese, and byJIS X 0213 (the successor to JIS X 0208).^[5][6] Unlike the other extensions made by Windows-932/WHATWG and JIS X 0213, the two match rather than colliding, so decoding of most of this row is better supported than the other extensions made by JIS X 0213.

In order to representcode points, column/line numbers are used for one-byte codes andkuten numbers are used for two-byte codes. For a way to identify a character without depending on a code, character names are used.

Almost all JIS X 0208graphic character codes are represented with two bytes of at least seven bits each. However, everycontrol character, as well as the plainspace – although not theideographic space – is represented with a one-byte code. In order to represent thebit combination (ビット組合せ,bitto kumiawase) of a one-byte code, two decimal numbers – acolumn number and aline number – are used. Three high-order bits out of seven or four high-order bits out of eight, counting from zero to seven or from zero to fifteen respectively, form the column number. Four low-order bits counting from zero to fifteen form the line number. Each decimal number corresponds to onehexadecimal digit. For example, the bit combination corresponding to the graphic character "space" is 010 0000 as a 7-bit number, and 0010 0000 as an 8-bit number. In column/line notation, this is represented as 2/0. Other representations of the same single-byte code include 0x20 as hexadecimal, or 32 as a single decimal number.

The double-byte codes are laid out in 94 numbered groups, each called arow (区,ku, lit. "section"). Every row contains 94 numbered codes, each called acell (点,ten, lit. "point").^[j] This makes a total of 8836 (94 × 94) possible code points (although not all are assigned, see below); these are laid out in the standard in a 94-line, 94-column code table.

A row number and a cell number (each numbered from 1 to 94, for a standard JIS X 0208 code) form akuten (区点) point, which is used to represent double-byte code points. A code number orkuten number (区点番号,kuten bangō) is expressed in the form "row-cell", the row and cell numbers being separated by ahyphen. For example, the character "亜" has a code point at row 16, cell 1, so its code number is represented as "16-01".

In 7-bit JIS X 0208 (as might be switched to in JIS X 0202 /ISO-2022-JP), both bytes must be from the 94-byte range of0x21 (used for row or cell number 1) through 0x7E (used for row or cell number 94) – exactly corresponding to the range used for 7-bit ASCII printing characters, not counting the space. Accordingly, the encoded bytes are obtained by adding 0x20 (32) to each number.^[7] For instance, the above example of 16-01 ("亜") would be represented by the bytes0x30 0x21. The 8-bitEUC-JP instead uses the range 0xA1 through 0xFE (setting the high bit to 1), whereas other encodings such asShift JIS use more complicated transforms. Shift JIS includes more encoding space than is needed for JIS X 0208 itself; some Shift JIS specific extensions to JIS X 0208 make use of row numbers above 94.^[8]

This structure is also used in the Mainland ChineseGB 2312, where it is natively known as区位;qūwèi, and the South Korean KS C 5601 (currentlyKS X 1001), where theku andten are respectively known ashang^[9] (행;行;haeng) andyol^[9] (열;列;yeol). The laterJIS X 0213 extends this structure by having more than one plane (面,men, lit. "face") of rows, which is also the structure used byCNS 11643, and related to the structure used byCCCII.

Among the 2-byte codes, rows 9 to 15 and 85 to 94 areunassigned code points (空き領域,aki ryōiki); that is, they are code points with no characters assigned to them. Also, some cells in other rows are also essentially unassigned code points.

These empty areas contain code points that should basically not be used. Except when there is prior agreement among the relevant parties, characters (gaiji) for information interchange should not be assigned to the unassigned code points.

Even when assigning characters to unassigned code points, graphic characters defined in the standard should not be assigned to them, and the same character should not be assigned to multiple unassigned code points; characters should not be duplicated in the set.

Furthermore, when assigning characters to unassigned code points, it is necessary to be cautious ofunification in regards to kanji glyphs. For example, row 25 cell 66 corresponds to the kanji meaning "high" or "expensive"; both the form with a component resembling the "mouth" character (口) in the middle (高) and the less common form with a ladder-like construction in the same location (髙) are subsumed into the same code point. Consequently, limiting point 25-66 to the "mouth" form and assigning the latter "ladder" form to an unassigned code point would technically be in violation of the standard.

In practice, however, several vendor-specificShift JIS variants, includingWindows-932 andMacJapanese, encode vendor extensions in unallocated rows of the encoding space for JIS X 0208. Also, most of the codes unassigned in JIS X 0208 are assigned by the newerJIS X 0213 standard.

Each JIS X 0208 character is given aname. By using a character's name, it is possible to identify characters without relying on their codes. The names of characters are coordinated with other character set standards, notably theUniversal Coded Character Set (UCS/Unicode), so this is one possible source of character mappings to character sets such as Unicode. For example, both the character atISO/IEC 646 International Reference Version (US-ASCII) column 4 line 1 and the one at JIS X 0208 row 3 cell 33 have the name "LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A". Therefore, the character at 4/1 in ASCII and the character at 3-33 in JIS X 0208 can be regarded as the same character (although, in practice,alternative mapping is used for the JIS X 0208 character due to encodings providing ASCII separately). Conversely, ASCII characters 2/2 (quotation mark), 2/7 (apostrophe), 2/13 (hyphen-minus), and 7/14 (tilde) can be determined to be characters that do not exist in this standard.

Character names of non-kanji characters use uppercase Roman letters, spaces, and hyphens. Non-kanji characters are given a Japanese-language common name (日本語通用名称,Nihongo tsūyō meishō), but some provisions for these names do not exist.^[k] The names of kanji, on the other hand, are mechanically set according to the corresponding hexadecimal representation of their code in UCS/Unicode. The name of a kanji can be arrived at by prepending the Unicode codepoint with "CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-". For example, row 16 cell 1 (亜) corresponds to U+4E9C in UCS, so the name of it would be "CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-4E9C". Kanji are not given Japanese common names.

JIS X 0208 prescribes a set of 6879 graphical characters that correspond to two-byte codes with either seven or eight bits to the byte; in JIS X 0208, this is called thekanji set (漢字集合,kanji shūgō), which includes 6355 kanji as well as 524non-kanji (非漢字,hikanji), including characters such asLatin letters,kana, and so forth.

Special characters

Occupies rows 1 and 2. There are 18descriptor symbols (記述記号,kijutsu kigō) such as the "ideographic space" (　), and the Japanesecomma andperiod; eightdiacritical marks such asdakuten and handakuten; 10 characters forthings that follow kana or kanji (仮名又は漢字に準じるもの,kana mata wa kanji ni junjiru mono) such as theIteration mark; 22bracket symbols (括弧記号,kakko kigō); 45mathematical symbols (学術記号,gakujutsu kigō); and 32unit symbols, which includes thecurrency sign and thepostal mark, for a total of 147 characters.

Numerals

Occupies part of row 3. The ten digits from "0" to "9".

Latin letters

Occupies part of row 3. The 26 letters of the English alphabet in uppercase and lowercase form for a total of 52.

Hiragana

Occupies row 4. Contains 48 unvoiced kana (including the obsoletewi andwe), 20 voiced kana (dakuten), 5 semi-voiced kana (handakuten), 10 small kana for palatalized and assimilated sounds, for a total of 83 characters.

Katakana

Occupies row 5. There are 86 characters; in addition to the katakana equivalents of the hiragana characters, thesmallka/ke kana (ヵ/ヶ) and thevu kana (ヴ).

Greek letters

Occupies row 6. The 24 letters of the Greek alphabet in uppercase and lowercase form (minus the finalsigma) for a total of 48.

Cyrillic letters

Occupies row 7. The 33 letters of theRussian alphabet in uppercase and lowercase form for a total of 66.

Box-drawing characters

Occupies row 8. Thin segments, thick segments, and mixed thin and thick segments, 32 total.

Kanji

The 2965 characters oflevel 1 (第1水準,dai ichi suijun) from row 16 to row 47, and the 3390 characters oflevel 2 (第2水準,dai ni suijun) from row 48 to row 84 for a total of 6355.

As for the special characters in the kanji set, some characters from the graphic character set of the International Reference Version (IRV) ofISO/IEC 646:1991 (equivalent toASCII) are absent from JIS X 0208. There are the aforementioned four characters "QUOTATION MARK", "APOSTROPHE", "HYPHEN-MINUS", and "TILDE". The former three are split into different code points in the kanji set (Nishimura, 1978; JIS X 0221-1:2001 standard, Section 3.8.7). The "TILDE" of IRV has no corresponding character in the kanji set.

In the following table, the ISO/IEC 646:1991 IRV characters in question are compared with their multiple equivalents in JIS X 0208, except for the IRV character "TILDE", which is compared with the "WAVE DASH" of JIS X 0208. The entries under the "Symbol" columns utilize UCS/Unicode code points, so the specifics of display may differ.

The ASCII/IRV characters without exact JIS X 0208 equivalents were later assigned code points byJIS X 0213, these are also listed below, as areMicrosoft's mapping of the four characters.

This means that the kanji set is the most widespread non-upward-compatible character set in the world; it is counted as one of the weak points of this standard.

Even with the 90 special characters, numerals, and Latin letters the kanji set and the IRV set have in common, this standard does not follow the arrangement of ISO/IEC 646. These 90 characters are split between rows 1 (punctuation) and 3 (letters and numbers), although row 3 does follow ISO 646 arrangement for the 62 letters and numbers alone (e.g.4/1 ("A") in ISO 646 becomes2/3 4/1 (i.e. 3-33) in JIS X 0208).

As to the cause of how these numerals, Latin letters, and so forth in the kanji set are the "full-width alphanumeric characters" (全角英数字,zenkaku eisūji) and how the original implementation came forth with a differing interpretation compared to the IRV, it is thought that it is due to these incompatibilities.

Ever since the first standard, it has been possible to representcomposites (合成,gōsei) such asencircled numbers, ligatures for measurement unit names, andRoman numerals;^[10] they were not given independentkuten code points. Although individual companies that manufacture information systems can make an effort to represent these characters as customers may require by the composition of the characters, none has requested to have them added to the standard, instead choosing to proprietarily offer them asgaiji.

In the fourth standard (1997), all these characters were explicitly defined as characters that accompany an advancement of the current position; that is to say, they arespacing characters. Furthermore, it was ruled that they should not be made by the composition of characters. For this reason, it became disallowed to represent Latin characters withdiacritics at all, with possibly the sole exception of theångström symbol (Å) at row 2 cell 82.

Thehiragana andkatakana in JIS X 0208, unlikeJIS X 0201, includedakuten andhandakuten markings as part of a character. The katakanawi (ヰ) andwe (ヱ) (both obsolete in modern Japanese) as well as the smallwa (ヮ), not in JIS X 0201, are also included.

The arrangement of kana in JIS X 0208 is different from the arrangement of katakana in JIS X 0201. In JIS X 0201, the syllabary starts withwo (ヲ), followed by the small kana sorted bygojūon order, followed by the full-size kana, also ingojūon order (ヲァィゥェォャュョッーアイウエオ......ラリルレロワン). On the other hand, in JIS X 0208, the kana are sorted first bygojūon order, then in the order of "small kana, full-size kana, kana with dakuten, and kana with handakuten" such that the same fundamental kana is grouped with its derivatives (ぁあぃいぅうぇえぉお......っつづ......はばぱひびぴふぶぷへべぺほぼぽ......ゎわゐゑをん). This ordering was chosen in order to more simply facilitate the sorting of kana-based dictionary look-ups (Yasuoka, 2006).^[l]

As mentioned above, in this standard, the previously defined katakana order in JIS X 0201 was not followed in JIS X 0208. It is thought that the JIS X 0201 katakana being "half-width kana" arose due to the incompatibility with the katakana of this standard. This point is also one of the weaknesses of this standard.

How the kanji in this standard were chosen from what sources, why they are split into level 1 and level 2, and how they are arranged are all explained in detail in the fourth standard (1997). Per that explanation, the kanji included in the following four kanji listings were reflected in the 6349 characters of the first standard (1978).

• Kanji Listing for Standard Code (Tentative) (標準コード用漢字表 (試案),Hyōjun Kōdo-yō Kanjihyō (Shian))
  TheInformation Processing Society of Japan kanji code committee compiled this list in 1971. In the below "Correspondence Analysis Results", this appears to be 6086 characters.
• Basic Kanji for Administrative Data Processing Use (行政情報処理用基本漢字,Gyōsei Jōhō Shoriyō Kihon Kanji)
  Selected by theAdministrative Management Agency of Japan in 1975, it consists of 2817 characters. For data for the purpose of selection, the Agency made a report which, starting with the "Kanji Listing for Standard Code (Tentative)", contrasted several kanji listings, the "Correspondence Analysis Results and Frequency of Use of Kanji for Administrative Data Processing Use Normal Kanji Selection" (行政情報処理用標準漢字選定のための漢字の使用頻度および対応分析結果,Gyōsei Jōhō Shoriyō Kihon Kanji Sentei no Tame no Kanji no Shiyō Hindo Oyobi Taiō Bunseki Kekka), or "Correspondence Analysis Results" (対応分析結果,Taiō Bunseki Kekka) for short.
• Japanese Personality Registration Name Kanji (日本生命収容人名漢字,Nihon Seimei Shūyō Jinmei Kanji)
  One of the kanji listings that compose the "Correspondence Analysis Results", consisting of 3044 characters. It no longer exists. The original list was nonexistent for the original drafting committee; this kanji list was reflected in the standard to follow the "Correspondence Analysis Results".
• Kanji for National Administrative District Listing (国土行政区画総覧使用漢字,Kokudo Gyōsei Kukaku Sōran Shiyō Kanji)
  One of the kanji listings that compose the "Correspondence Analysis Results", consisting of 3251 characters. They are the kanji used in the list of all administrative place names compiled by theJapan Geographic Data Center, the "National Administrative District Listing" (国土行政区画総覧,Kokudo Gyōsei Kukaku Sōran). The original drafting committee did not investigate the listing itself; the kanji used from this list followed the "Correspondence Analysis Results".

In the second and third standards, they added four and two characters to level 2, respectively, bringing the total kanji to 6355. Also, in the second standard, character forms were changed as well as transposition among the levels; in the third standard as well, character forms were changed. These are described further below.

The 2,965 Level 1 kanji occupy rows 16 to 47. The 3,390 Level 2 kanji occupy rows 48 to 84.

For level 1, characters common to multiple kanji glyph listings were chosen, using thetōyō kanji, the tōyō kanji correction draft, and thejinmeiyō kanji as a basis. Also, JIS C 6260 ("To-Do-Fu-Ken (Prefecture) Identification Code"; currentlyJIS X 0401) and JIS C 6261 ("Identification code for cities, towns and villages"; currentlyJIS X 0402) were consulted; kanji for nearly all Japaneseprefectures, cities, districts, wards, towns, villages, and so forth were intentionally placed in level 1.^[m] Furthermore, amendments by experts were added.

Level 2 was dedicated to kanji that made an appearance in the aforementioned four major listings but were not selected for level 1. As noted below, the kanji of level 1 were ordered by their pronunciation, so among the kanji whose pronunciation were difficult to determine, there were those that were transferred from level 1 to level 2 on that basis (Nishimura, 1978).

Due to these decisions, for the most part, level 1 contains more frequently used kanji, and level 2 contains more infrequently used kanji, but of course, those were judged by the standards of the day; over the passage of time, some level 2 kanji have become more frequently used, such as one meaning "to soar" (翔) and one meaning "to glitter" (煌); and inversely, some level 1 kanji have become infrequent, notably the ones meaning "centimeter" (糎) and "millimeter" (粍). Of the currentjōyō kanji, 30 fall into level 2,^[n] while three are missing altogether (塡󠄀, 剝󠄀 and 頰󠄀).^[o] Of the currentjinmeiyō kanji, 192 are in level 2,^[p] while 105 are not part of the standard.^[q]

The kanji in level 1 are sorted in order of each one's "representative reading" (i.e. a canonical reading chosen for the purposes of this standard only); the reading of a kanji for this may be anon or akun reading; readings are sorted ingojūon order.^[r] As a general rule, theon (Chinese-sound) reading is considered the representative reading; where a kanji has multipleon readings, the reading judged to be predominant in use frequency is used for the representative reading (JIS C 6226-1978 standard, Section 3.4). For the small percentage of kanji that either do not have anon reading or have anon reading which is little known and not in common use, thekun reading was employed as the representative reading. Where a verbkun reading must be used as the representative reading, theren'yōkei (rather than theshūshikei) form is used.

For example, cells 1 to 41 on row 16 are 41 characters sorted as starting with a reading ofa. Within these, 22 characters, including 16-10 (葵:on reading "ki";kun reading "aoi") and 16-32 (粟:on readings "zoku" and "shoku";kun reading "awa") are there on the basis of theirkun readings. 16-09 (逢:on reading "hō",kun reading "a(i)") and 16-23 (扱:on readings "sō" and "kyū",kun reading "atsuka(i)") are just two examples ofren'yōkei-form verbs used for the representative reading.

Where the representative reading is the same between different kanji, a kanji that uses anon reading is placed ahead of one that uses akun reading. Where theon orkun readings are the same between more than one kanji, they are then ordered by theirprimary radical andstroke count.

Whether on level 1 or level 2,itaiji are arranged to directly follow their exemplar form. For example, in level 2, right after row 49 cell 88 (劍), the immediately following characters deviate from the general rule (stroke count in this case) to include three variants of 49-88 (劔,劒, and剱).^[s]

The kanji in level 2 are arranged in order of primary radical and stroke count. Where these two properties are the same for different kanji, they are then sorted by reading.

It has been pointed out that there are kanji in the kanji set that are not found in comprehensive, unabridged kanji dictionaries, and that the sources thereof are unknown. For example, only one year after the first standard was established, Tajima (1979) reported that he had confirmed 63 kanji that were not to be found inShinjigen (a large kanji dictionary published byKadokawa Shoten), nor inDai Kan-Wa jiten, and they did not make sense asryakuji of any sort; he noted that it would be preferable for kanji not available in kanji dictionaries to be selected from definite sources. These kanji came to be known as "ghost" characters (幽霊文字,yūrei moji) or "ghost kanji" (幽霊漢字,yūrei kanji), among other names.

The drafting committee for the fourth version of the standard also saw the existence of kanji with sources unknown as a problem, and so made an inquiry into just what kind of sources the drafting committee of the first version referenced. As a result, it was discovered that the original drafting committee had heavily relied on the "Correspondence Analysis Results" to collect kanji. When the drafting committee investigated the "Correspondence Analysis Results", it became clear that many of the kanji included in the kanji set but not found in exhaustive kanji dictionaries supposedly came from the "Japanese Personality Registration Name Kanji" and "Kanji for National Administrative District Listing" lists mentioned in the "Correspondence Analysis Results".

It was confirmed that no original text for the "Japanese Personality Registration Name Kanji" referenced in the "Correspondence Analysis Results" exists. For the "National Administrative District Listing",Sasahara Hiroyuki of the fourth version's drafting committee examined the kanji that appeared on the in-progress development pages for the first standard. The committee also consulted many ancient writings, as well as many examples of personal names in a database ofNTT phone books.

Due to this thorough investigation, the committee was able to pare down the number of kanji for which the source cannot be confidently explained to twelve, shown on the adjacent table. Of these, it is conjectured that several glyphs came about due to copying errors. In particular, 妛 was probably created when printers tried to create 𡚴 by cutting and pasting 山 and 女 together. A shadow from that process was misinterpreted as a line, resulting in 妛 (a picture of this can be found in theJōyō kanji jiten).

According to the specifications in the fourth standard (1997),unification (包摂,hōsetsu, not the same term used forUnicode's "unification" although it is nearly the same concept) is the action of giving the same code point to a character without regard to its different character forms. In the fourth standard, theglyphs allowed are limited; the extent to which particularallographic glyphs are unified into agraphemic code point is clearly defined.

Furthermore, according to the specifications in the standard, aglyph (字体,jitai, lit. "character body";) is an abstract notion as to the graphical representation of a graphic character; acharacter form (字形,jikei, lit. "character shape"; also a "glyph" in a sense, but differentiated on a different level for standardization purposes) is the representation as a graphical shape that a glyph takes in actuality (e.g. due to a glyph being handwritten, printed, displayed on a screen, etc.). For a single glyph, there exist an endless range of possible concretely and/or visibly different character forms. A variation between a character form of one glyph is termed a "design difference" (デザインの差,dezain no sa).

The extent to which a glyph is unified to one code point is determined according to that code point's "example glyph" (例示字体,reiji jitai) and the "unification criteria" (包摂規準,hōsetsu kijun) that can be applied to that example glyph; that is, the example glyph for a code point applies to that code point, and any glyphs for which the parts that compose the example glyph are replaced in accordance with the unification criteriaalso apply to that code point.

For example, the example glyph at 33-46 (僧) is composed ofradical 9 (亻) and the kanji that eventually spawned theso kana (曽). Also, in unification criterion 101, there are three kanji displayed: the first takes the form most often seen in Japanese (曽); the second contains a more traditional form (曾) in which the first two strokes formradical 12 (the kanji numeral for the number 8:八); and the third is like the second, except that radical 12 is inverted (曾). Consequently, all three permutations (僧,僧,僧) all apply to the code point at line 33 cell 46.

In the fourth standard, including one of theerrata for the first printing, there are 186 unification criteria.

When a code point's example glyph is composed of more than one part glyph, unification criteria can be applied to each part. After a unification criterion is applied to one part glyph, that part cannot have any more unification criteria applied to it. Also, a unification criterion is not allowed to apply if the resulting glyph would coincide with that of another code point entirely.

An example glyph is no more than an example for that code point; it is not a glyph "endorsed" by the standard. Also, the unification criteria need only be used for generally used kanji and for the purpose of assigning things to the code points of this standard. The standard requests that generally unused kanji not be created based on the example glyphs and unification criteria.

The kanji of the kanji set are not chosen completely consistently according to the unification criteria. For example, although 41-7 corresponds to the form where the third and fourth strokes cross (彥) as well as the form where they don't (彦) according to unification criterion 72, 20-73 only corresponds to the form where they do not cross (顔), and 80-90 only corresponds to the form where they do (顏).

The terms "unification", "unification criteria", and "example glyph" were adopted in the fourth standard. From the first to the third version, kanji and relations between kanji were grouped into three types: "independent" (独立,dokuritsu), "compatible" (対応,taiō), and "equivalent" (同値,dōchi); it was explained that the characters recognized as equivalent "consolidate to just one point". "Equivalence" included, other than kanji with exactly the same shape, kanji with differences due to style, and kanji where the difference in character form is small.

In the first standard, it was stipulated that "this standard ... does not establish the particulars of character forms" (Section 3.1); it also states that "the aim of this standard is to establish the general idea of characters and their codes; the design of their character forms and such lie outside its scope." In the second and third standards as well, notes to the effect that specific designs of character forms lie outside its scope (the note on item 1). The fourth standard also stipulates that "This standard regulates graphic characters as well as their bit patterns, and the use, specific designs of individual characters, and so forth are not within the scope of this standard" (JIS X 0208:1997, item 1).

In the fourth standard, "unification criteria for maintaining compatibility with previous standards" (過去の規格との互換性を維持するための包摂規準,kako no kikaku to no gokansei wo iji suru tame no hōsetsu kijun) is defined. Their application is limited to 29 code points whose glyphs vary greatly between the standards JIS C 6226-1983 on and after and JIS C 6226-1978. For those 29 code points, the glyphs from JIS C 6226-1983 on and after are displayed as "A", and the glyphs from JIS C 6226-1978 as "B". On each of them, both "A" and "B" glyphs may be applied. However, in order to claim compatibility with the standard, whether the "A" or "B" form has been used for each code point must be explicitly noted.

In JIS X 0208:1997, article 7 combined with appendices 1 and 2 define a total of eight encoding schemes.

In the descriptions below, the "CL" (control left), "GL" (graphic left), "CR" (control right), and "GR" (graphic right) regions are respectively, in column/line notation, from 0/0 to 1/15, from 2/1 to 7/14, from 8/0 to 9/15, and from 10/1 to 15/14. For each code, 2/0 is assigned the graphic character "SPACE" and 7/15 the control character "DELETE". TheC0 control characters (defined inJIS X 0211 and matchingISO/IEC 6429) are assigned to the CL region.

7-bit encoding for kanji

Stipulated in the standard itself. The JIS X 0208 double-byte set is assigned to the GL region.

8-bit encoding for kanji

Stipulated in the standard itself. Same as the 7-bit encoding, but defined in terms of 8-bit bytes. The CR region may be unused, or encode theC1 control characters from JIS X 0211. The GR region is unused.

International Reference Version + 7-bit encoding for kanji

Stipulated in the standard itself. Theshift in control character designates theISO/IEC 646:1991 IRV (International Reference Version, equivalent toUS-ASCII) to the GL region.Shift out designates the JIS X 0208 double-byte set to the same region.

Latin characters + 7-bit encoding for kanji

Stipulated in the standard itself. As with IRV+7-bit, but with ISO/IEC 646:IRV replaced withISO/IEC 646:JP (the Roman set ofJIS X 0201).

International Reference Version + 8-bit encoding for kanji

Stipulated in the standard itself. ISO/IEC 646:IRV is assigned to the GL region, JIS X 0208 to the GR region. This is effectively a subset ofEUC-JP, excluding the half-width katakana fromJIS X 0201 and the supplemental kanji fromJIS X 0212.

Latin characters + 8-bit encoding for kanji

Stipulated in the standard itself. As with IRV+8-bit, but with ISO/IEC 646:IRV replaced with ISO/IEC 646:JP.

Shift-coded character set

Stipulated in Appendix 1: "Shift-Coded Representation" (シフト符号化表現,Shifuto Fugōka Hyōgen). The authoritative definition ofShift JIS.

RFC 1468-coded character set

Stipulated in Appendix 2: "RFC 1468-Coded Representation" (RFC 1468符号化表現,RFC 1468 Fugōka Hyōgen). ResemblesISO-2022-JP (which is authoritatively defined in RFC 1468) but is defined in terms of eight-bit bytes, whereas ISO-2022-JP is defined in terms of seven-bit bytes.

Among the encodings stipulated in the fourth standard, only the "Shift" coded character set is registered by theIANA.^[11] However, certain others are closely related to IANA-registered encodings defined elsewhere (EUC-JP and ISO-2022-JP).

JIS X 0208 may be used withinISO 2022/JIS X 0202 (of which ISO-2022-JP is a subset). Theescape sequences to designate JIS X 0208 to each of the four ISO 2022 code sets are listed below. Here, "ESC" refers to the control character "Escape" (0x1B, or 1/11).

The escape sequence starting ESC 2/4 selects a multi-byte character set. The escape sequence starting ESC 2/6 specifies a revision of the upcoming character set selection. JIS C 6226:1978 is identified by the multibyte-94-set identifier byte 4/0 (corresponding to ASCII@). JIS C 6226:1983 / JIS X 0208:1983 is identified by the multibyte-94-set identifier byte 4/2 (B). JIS X 0208:1990 is also identified by the 94-set identifier byte 4/2, but can be distinguished with the revision identifier 4/0 (@).

When using the kanji set of this standard with either the ISO/IEC 646:1991 IRV graphic character set (ASCII) or JIS X 0201's graphic character set for Latin characters (JIS-Roman), the treatment of the characters common to both sets becomes problematic. Unless one takes special measures, the characters included in both sets do not all map to each other one-to-one, and a single character may be given more than one code point; that is, it may cause a duplicate encoding.

JIS X 0208:1997, in regards to when a character is common to both sets, basically forbids the use of the code point in the kanji set (which is one of two code points), eliminating duplicate encodings. It is judged that characters that have the same name are the same character.

For example, both the name of the character corresponding to the bit pattern 4/1 in ASCII and the name of the character corresponding to row 3 cell 33 of the kanji set are "LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A". In International Reference Version + 8-bit code for kanji, whether by the bit pattern 4/1 or by the bit pattern corresponding to the kanji set's row 3 cell 33 (10/3 12/1), the letter "A" (i.e. "LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A") is represented. The standard forbids the use of the "10/3 12/1" bit pattern, in an attempt to eliminate the duplicate encoding.

In consideration to implementations that treat the characters of the code points in the kanji set as "full-width characters" and those of ASCII or JIS-Roman as different characters, the use of the kanji set code points is permitted only for the sake of backwards compatibility. For example, for the purpose of backwards compatibility, it is permitted to consider 10/3 12/1 in International Reference Version + 8-bit code for kanji to correspond to a full-width "A".

If the kanji set is used along with ASCII or JIS-Roman, then even if the standard is abided by strictly, the unique encoding of a character is not guaranteed. For example, in the International Reference Version + 8-bit code for kanji, it is valid to represent ahyphen with the bit pattern 2/13 for the character "HYPHEN-MINUS", as well as with the kanji set's row 1 cell 30 (bit pattern 10/1 11/14) for the character "HYPHEN". In addition, the standard does not define which of the two to use for what, and so the hyphen is not given one unique encoding. The same problem affects theminus sign, thequotation marks, and so forth.

Moreover, even if the kanji set is used as a separate code, there is no guarantee that the unique encoding of characters is implemented. In many cases, however, the full-width "IDEOGRAPHIC SPACE" at row 1 cell 1 and the half-width space (2/0) coexist. How the two should be different is not self-explanatory, and is not specified in the standard.

Until five years have passed after a Japanese Industrial Standard has been established, reaffirmed, or revised, the prior standard undergoes a process of reaffirmation, revision, or withdrawal. Since establishment, the standard has been subject to revision three times, and at present, the fourth standard is valid.

The first standard isJIS C 6226-1978 "Code of Japanese Graphic Character Set for Information Interchange" (情報交換用漢字符号系,Jōhō Kōkan'yō Kanji Fugōkei), established by the JapaneseMinister of International Trade and Industry on 1 January 1978. It is also called78JIS for short. Entrusted by theAgency of Industrial Science and Technology, aJIPDEC kanji code standardization research and study committee produced the draft. The committee chairman wasMoriguchi Shigeichi.

The code included 453 non-Kanji (including Hiragana, Katakana, the Roman, Greek and Cyrillic alphabets and punctuation) and 6349 Kanji (2965 level 1 Kanji and 3384 level 2 Kanji) for a total of 6802 characters.^[12] It did not yet includebox-drawing characters. The standard itself was set inShaken Co., Ltd's Ishii Mincho typeface.

The second standardJIS C 6226-1983 "Code of Japanese Graphic Character Set for Information Interchange" (情報交換用漢字符号系,Jōhō Kōkan'yō Kanji Fugōkei) revised the first standard on 1 September 1983. It is also called83JIS. Entrusted by the AIST, a JIPDEC kanji code-related JIS committee produced the draft. The committee chairman wasMotooka Tōru.

The draft of the second standard was based on the consideration of factors such as the promulgation of thejōyō kanji, the enforcement of thejinmeiyō kanji, and the standardization of Japanese-languageTeletex by theMinistry of Posts and Telecommunications; also, the next modification was performed to keep pace with JIS C 6234-1983 (24-pixel matrix printer character forms; presently JIS X 9052).

Addition of special characters

39 characters were added to the special characters. Among these 39, perJICST recommendations, and from such standards as JIS Z 8201-1981 (mathematical symbols) and JIS Z 8202-1982 (quantity, unit, and chemical symbols), things that could not be represented by composition were chosen.

Newly added box-drawing characters

32box-drawing characters were added.

Swapping ofitaiji code points

Code points for 22variant pairs of Kanji were swapped, such that the variant in level 2 was moved to level 1 and vice versa.^[12][13] For example, (level 1's) row 36 cell 59 in the first standard (壺) was moved to (level 2's) row 52 cell 68; the point originally at row 52 cell 68 (壷) was in turn moved to row 36 cell 59.

Additions to the level 2 kanji

Three characters from level 1 and one character from level 2 were given new code points at previously unassigned code points in row 84 as level 2 kanji.Itaiji for each of those code points were newly assigned to their original locations.^[14] For example, row 84 cell 1 in the second standard (堯) was moved there to accommodate a different form not included in the first standard at row 22 cell 38 as a level 1 kanji (尭).

Modification of character forms

The character forms of approximately 300 kanji were amended.^[15]

Among the changes in those 300 or so kanji character forms, many level 1 glyphs that were in the style of theKangxi Dictionary were changed into variants, and especially more simplified forms (e.g.ryakuji andextended shinjitai). For example, a couple of code points that are often the subject of criticism due to being greatly changed are row 18 cell 10 (78JIS:鷗, 83JIS:鴎) and row 38 cell 34 (78JIS:瀆, 83JIS:涜).

There were many smaller changes away from the Kangxi-style variants; for example, row 25 cell 84 (鵠) lost part of a stroke. Also, where some glyphs for level 1 kanji were not Kangxi-style forms, there were some changed into their Kangxi-style forms; for example, row 80 cell 49 (靠) gained part of a stroke (i.e., the same part of the stroke that 25-84 lost).

In order to elucidate the original intent of the first standard, these ended up falling into parameters for unification criteria in the fourth standard. The difference in form for the examples noted above ("鵠" and "靠") falls under the parameters for unification criterion 42 (concerning the component "告").^[t]

The bulk of the changes to character forms are differences between level 1 and level 2 kanji. Specifically, simplification was done more often for level 1 kanji than for level 2 kanji; simplifications applied to level 1 kanji (e.g. "潑" to "溌" and "醱" to "醗") were not generally applied to kanji in level 2 ("撥" stayed as-is). The aforementioned 25-84 (鵠) and 80-49 (靠) were given different treatment likewise, as the former is in level 1 and the latter is in level 2. Even so, there were some changes regardless of the level; for instance characters containing the "door" (戸) and "winter" (冬) components were changed with no different treatment between level 1 and level 2 kanji.

However, for 29 code points (such as the problematic 18-10 and 38-34 mentioned above), the forms inherited by the fourth standard contradicts the original intent of the first. For these, there are special unification criteria to maintain compatibility with the previous standards at these code points.

When the new "X" category for Japanese Industrial Standards (for information-related fields) was introduced, the second standard was re-termedJIS X 0208-1983^[12] on 1 March 1987.

The third standardJIS X 0208-1990 "Code of Japanese Graphic Character Set for Information Interchange" (情報交換用漢字符号,Jōhō Kōkan'yō Kanji Fugō) revised the second standard on 1 September 1990. It is also called90JIS for short. Entrusted by the AIST, a committee at theJapanese Standards Association for the revision of JIS X 0208 created the draft. The committee chairman wasTajima Kazuo.

225 kanji glyphs were changed, and two characters were added to level 2 (84-05 "凜" and 84-06 "熙"). This was a disunification ofitaiji for two characters already included (49-59 "凛" and 63-70 "煕"). Some of the changes and the two additions corresponded to the 118jinmeiyō kanji added in March 1990.^[12] The standard itself was set inHeisei Mincho.

The fourth standardJIS X 0208:1997 "7-bit and 8-bit double byte coded KANJI sets for information interchange" (7ビット及び8ビットの2バイト情報交換用符号化漢字集合,Nana-Bitto Oyobi Hachi-Bitto no Ni-Baito Jōhō Kōkan'yō Fugōka Kanji Shūgō) revised the third standard on 20 January 1997. It is also called97JIS for short. Entrusted by the AIST, a JSA committee for research and study of coded character sets produced the draft. The committee chairman wasShibano Kōji.

The basic policies of this revision were to perform no changes the character set, to clarify ambiguous provisions, and to make the standard relatively easier to use. Addition, removal, and code point rearrangement were not done, and without exception, the example glyphs were also left unchanged. However, the stipulations of the standard were completely re-written and/or supplemented. Whereas the third standard was 65 pages long without the explanations, the fourth standard was 374 pages without the explanations.

The main points of the revision are:

Definition of encoding methods

Until the third standard, only the encoding method based on JIS X 0202 code extension was defined. This is something unusual as far as coded character sets go. In the fourth standard, encoding methods that do not use escape sequences for the purpose of code extension were defined.

Definition of the general prohibition of the use of unassigned code points and methods of usage for unassigned code points

The third standard, in an explanation that was not part of the standard, described things as if there were places where for some unassigned code points, it was acceptable to assign gaiji. In the fourth standard, it was clarified that use of unassigned code points is generally prohibited. Also, the conditions for the usage of unassigned code points were specified.

General elimination of duplicate encodings

Each character was given a "character name" that maps to those of other standards. Also, encoding methods to use them together with the ISO/IEC 646's International Reference Version or JIS X 0201 were specified. When JIS X 0208 is used together with either, among two assigned code points for characters with the same name, only one is permitted; thus, duplicate encodings were generally eliminated.

Investigation into sources of kanji

Characters included in the standard so far that are found in neither theKangxi Dictionary nor theDai Kanwa Jiten were identified. Accordingly, exactly with what purpose for inclusion and from which sources these kanji came during compilation of the first standard was investigated.

Definition of kanji unification criteria

Based on things such as the materials for the drafting of the first standard, an attempt was made to restore the intent of the first standard for the scope of the glyphs each code point represents. Moreover, the criteria for unifying kanji glyphs were clearly defined.

Inclusion of de facto standards

By the time of the fourth standard, the encoding methodsShift JIS andISO-2022-JP had becomede facto standards for personal computing and e-mail, respectively. These encoding methods were included as "Shift-Coded Representation" and "RFC 1468-Coded Representation" (described above).

This section'sfactual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(December 2021)

JIS X 0213 (extended kanji) was designed "with the goal being to offer a sufficient character set for the purposes of encoding the modern Japanese language that JIS X 0208 intended to be from the start";^[16] it defines a character set that expands upon the kanji set of JIS X 0208. The drafters of JIS X 0213 recommend migration from JIS X 0208 to JIS X 0213, among the advantages being JIS X 0213's compatibility with theHyōgai Kanji Glyph List and with newerjinmeiyō kanji.

Contrary to the expectations of the drafters, adoption of JIS X 0213 has been anything but fast since its enactment in the year 2000. The drafting committee of JIS X 0213:2004 wrote (in the year 2004), "The status where 'what the majority of information systems can use in common is JIS X 0208 only' still continues." (JIS X 0213:2000, Appendix 1:2004, section 2.9.7)

ForMicrosoft Windows, the predominantoperating system (and hence supplying the predominantdesktop environment) in the personal computing sector, the JIS X 0213repertoire has been included sinceWindows Vista, released in November 2006.Mac OS X has been compatible with JIS X 0213 since version10.1 (released in 2001). ManyUnix-likes such asLinux can (optionally) support JIS X 0213 if desired. Therefore, it is thought that with time, JIS X 0213 support on personal computers will not be an impediment to its eventual adoption.

Among the drafters of JIS X 0213, there are those who expect to see a mix of JIS X 0208 and JIS X 0213 before any adoption of JIS X 0213 (Satō, 2004). However, JIS X 0208 continues to be used for the present, and many predict it to endure as a standard. There are barriers that need to be overcome if JIS X 0213 is to supplant JIS X 0208 in common usage:

• The character repertoires utilized in Japanesemobile phones at the present time^[when?] are based on JIS X 0208. There are no officially announced plans whatsoever to migrate these to JIS X 0213 compatibility. As mobile phones are now a pervasive aspect of Japanese textual communication (seeJapanese mobile phone culture), being a widespread, commonly accessed medium for sendinge-mail and accessing theWorld Wide Web, a lack of adoption for mobile phones deters usage elsewhere.
• JIS X 0213 is not strictly upward-compatible with JIS X 0208 in terms of unification criteria (seebelow). For large-scale archives (e.g.bibliographic databases andAozora Bunko) that use JIS X 0208 and follow its unification criteria strictly, it is thought that it would be extremely difficult work to both convert all the data to JIS X 0213 and preserve the same standard of textual integrity.
• In practice, many systems define and use unassigned code points in JIS X 0208. For example, Windows assigns IBM and NEC extended characters and user-defined character areas (seeWindows-932), and mobile phones assignemoji in some such places. The code points of thesegaiji conflict with the code points that JIS X 0213 codes use, so there would be some difficulty in migrating these systems from JIS X 0208 to JIS X 0213. There are also plans to migrate toUCS/Unicode and use the JIS X 0213 repertoire from there, but until a system administrator is able to judge that the implementations of UCS/Unicodesurrogate pairs and character compositions are sufficiently stable, he or she is likely to hesitate to use the repertoire of JIS X 0213 that requires those implementations.
• The improvements provided by JIS X 0213 are mostly in the realm of characters that are not used as often as the ones already present in JIS X 0208. Because there are nearly twice as many glyphs that need to be implemented for less usage of those extra glyphs, it can be a low return on investment in many cases, especially where resources are constrained.

Because JIS X 0208 / JIS C 6226 is primarily acharacter set and not a strictly definedcharacter encoding, several companies have implemented their own encodings of the character set.

• Apple:MacJapanese (Shift_JIS based)
• Fujitsu:JEF kanji code (EBCDIC based)
• Hitachi:KEIS (EBCDIC based)
• IBM: various, includingIBM-932 andIBM-942 (both Shift_JIS based)
• Microsoft:Windows-932 (Shift JIS based)
• NEC:JIPS

Several of these incorporate vendor-specific character assignments in place of unallocated regions of the standard. These include Windows-932 and MacJapanese, as well asNEC'sPC98 character encoding. While IBM-932 and IBM-942 also include vendor assignments, they include them outside of the region used for JIS X 0208.

As noted above, the kanji set is not upwardly compatible with the ISO/IEC 646:1991 IRV (ASCII) graphic character set. The kanji set and the IRV graphic character set can be used together as specified in JIS X 0208 (IRV + 7-bit code for kanji and IRV + 8-bit code for kanji). They can be used together inEUC-JP as well.

The kanji set lacks three characters included inJIS X 0201's graphic character set for Latin characters: 2/2 (QUOTATION MARK), 2/7 (APOSTROPHE), and 2/13 (HYPHEN-MINUS). The kanji set contains all character included in JIS X 0201's graphic character set for katakana.

The kanji set and the graphic character set for Latin characters can be used together as specified in JIS X 0208 (Latin characters + 7-bit code for kanji and the Latin characters + 8-bit code for kanji). The kanji set, graphic character set for Latin characters, and JIS X 0201's graphic character set for katakana can be used together as specified in JIS X 0208 (the shift-coded character set; i.e.Shift JIS). The kanji set and graphic character set for katakana can be used together inEUC-JP.

JIS X 0212 (supplementary kanji) defines additional characters with code points for the purposes of information processing that requires characters not found in JIS X 0208. Rather than allocating characters within the main JIS X 0208 kanji set, it defines a second 94-by-94 kanji set containing supplementary characters.

JIS X 0212 can be used with JIS X 0208 inEUC-JP. Also, JIS X 0208 and JIS X 0212 are both source standards for UCS/Unicode'sHan unification, meaning that kanji from both sets can be included in one Unicode-format document.

Among the code points that the second version of JIS X 0208 changed, 28 code points in JIS X 0212 reflect the character forms from before the changes.^[17] Also, JIS X 0212 reassigns the "closure mark" that JIS X 0208 had assigned as a non-kanji (〆, at row 1 cell 26) as a kanji (乄, at row 16 cell 17). JIS X 0212 has no characters in common with JIS X 0208 other than these. Hence, it is not suited for general use on its own.

However, in the fourth version of JIS X 0208, the connection to JIS X 0212 was not defined at all. It is believed that this is because the drafting committee of the fourth JIS X 0208 standard had a critical opinion of the selection and identification methods of JIS X 0212.^[18] The character meanings and selection rationales were not properly documented, making it difficult to identify whether desired kanji corresponded to those in its repertoire.^[19] The text of the fourth standard, as well as pointing out the problematic points of the character selection of JIS X 0212, states that "it is thought that not only is character selection impossible, it is also impossible to use together; the connection to JIS X 0212 is not defined at all." (section 3.3.1)

JIS X 0213 (extension kanji) defines a kanji set that expands upon the kanji set of JIS X 0208. According to this standard, it is "designed with the goal being to offer a sufficient character set for the purposes of encoding the modern Japanese language that JIS X 0208 intended to be from the start."^[16]

The kanji set of JIS X 0213 incorporates all characters that can be represented in the kanji set of JIS X 0208, with many additions. In total, JIS X 0213 defines 1183 non-kanji and 10,050 kanji (for a total of 11,233 characters), within two 94-by-94 planes (面,men). The first plane (non-kanji and level 1–3 kanji) is based on JIS X 0208, whereas the second plane (level 4 kanji) is designed to fit within the unallocated rows of JIS X 0212, allowing use inEUC-JP.^[20] JIS X 0213 also definesShift_JISx0213, a variant of Shift_JIS capable of encoding the entirety of JIS X 0213.

For most intents and purposes, JIS X 0213 plane 1 is a superset of JIS X 0208. However, different unification criteria are applied to some code points in JIS X 0213 compared to JIS X 0208. Consequently, some pairs of kanji glyphs that were represented by one JIS X 0208 code point, due to being unified, are given separate code points in JIS X 0213. For example, the glyph at row 33 cell 46 of JIS X 0208 ("僧", describedabove) unifies a few variants due to its right-hand component. In JIS X 0213, two forms (the ones containing the component "丷") are unified on plane 1 row 33 cell 46, and the other (containing the component "八") is located at plane 1 row 14 cell 41. Therefore, whether JIS X 0208 row 33 cell 46 should be mapped to JIS X 0213 plane 1 row 33 cell 46 or plane 1 row 14 cell 41 cannot be determined automatically.^[u] This limits the extent to which JIS X 0213 can be considered upwardly compatible with JIS X 0208, as admitted by the JIS X 0213 drafting committee.^[21]

However, for the most part, rowm celln in JIS X 0208 corresponds to plane 1 rowm celln in JIS X 0213; therefore, not much confusion arises in practice. This is because most typefaces have come to use the glyphs exemplified in JIS X 0208, and most users are not consciously aware of the unification criteria.

The kanji set of JIS X 0208 is among the original source standards for theHan unification inISO/IEC 10646 (UCS) andUnicode. Every kanji in JIS X 0208 corresponds to its own code point in UCS/Unicode'sBasic Multilingual Plane (BMP).

The non-kanji in JIS X 0208 also correspond to their own code points in the BMP. However, for some special characters, some systems implement a different correspondences from those of UCS/Unicode's (which are based on the character names given JIS X 0208:1997).

• JIS coded character sets
  • JIS X 0201 "7-bit and 8-bit coded character sets for information interchange"
  • JIS X 0202 "Information technology – Character code structure and extension techniques" (ISO/IEC 2022)
  • JIS X 0208 "7-bit and 8-bit double byte coded KANJI sets for information interchange"
  • JIS X 0211 "Control functions for coded character sets" (ISO/IEC 6429)
  • JIS X 0212 "Code of the supplementary Japanese graphic character set for information interchange"
  • JIS X 0213 "7-bit and 8-bit double byte coded extended KANJI sets for information interchange"
  • JIS X 0221 "Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS)" (ISO/IEC 10646)
• Extended shinjitai
• Help:Japanese

For the purposes of citation, theseJapanese names are presented as if they were in Western order where Romanized, and retain Eastern order where not.

• Nishimura, Hirohiko [西村 恕彦], 1978. The Kanji JIS [漢字のJIS].Standardization Journal [標準化ジャーナル], 171: 3–8.
• Nomura, Masaaki [野村 雅昭], 1984. Revision of JIS C 6226: Kanji codes for information interchange [JIS C 6226 情報交換用漢字符号系の改正].Standardization Journal [標準化ジャーナル], 14 (3): 4–9.
• Ogata, Katsuhiro [小形 克宏], 2006a.^[permanent dead link‍] Things that were not unified in 97JIS among the example glyphs changed in JIS C 6226-1983 (83JIS) [JIS C 6226-1983 (83JIS) で例示字体を変更したうち、97JISで包摂とされなかったもの]^{[permanent dead link‍]} (accessed 29 January 2007).
• Ogata, Katsuhiro [小形 克宏], 2006b.^[permanent dead link‍] Things that fell within the scope of unification among the example glyphs changed in JIS C 6226-1983 (83JIS) [JIS C 6226-1983 (83JIS) 例示字体変更のうち、包摂の範囲内だったもの]^{[permanent dead link‍]} (accessed 29 January 2007).
• Satō, Takayuki [佐藤 敬幸], 2004. Concerning the revision of JIS X 0213 (7-bit and 8-bit double byte coded extended Kanji sets for information interchange) [JIS X 0213 (7ビット及び8ビットの2バイト情報交換用符号化拡張漢字集合) の改正について].Standardization Journal [標準化ジャーナル], 34 (4): 8–12.
• Shibano, Kōji [芝野 耕司], 1997a. Concerning the revision of JIS X 0208 (7-bit and 8-bit double byte coded Kanji sets for information interchange ) [JIS X0208 (7ビット及び8ビットの2バイト情報交換用符号化漢字集合) の改正について].Standardization Journal [標準化ジャーナル], 27 (3): 8–12.
• Shibano, Kōji [芝野 耕司], 1997b. Plan for the extension of the JIS kanji [JIS漢字の拡張計画].Standardization Journal [標準化ジャーナル], 27 (7): 5–11.
• Shibano, Kōji [芝野 耕司], 2000. Establishment of JIS X 0213 (7-bit and 8-bit double byte coded extended Kanji sets for information interchange) [JIS X 0213 (7ビット及び8ビットの2バイト情報交換用符号化拡張漢字集合) の制定].Standardization Journal [標準化ジャーナル], 30 (3): 3–7.
• Shibano, Kōji [芝野 耕司], 2001. Concerning JIS kanji [漢字について].Standardization and Quality Control [標準化と品質管理], 54 (8): 44–50.
• Shibano, Kōji [芝野 耕司] (editor), 2002.JIS Kanji Dictionary, enlarged and revised edition [増補改訂 JIS漢字字典]. Tokyo: Japanese Standards Association (ISBN 4-542-20129-5).
• Shibano, Kōji [芝野 耕司], 2002.The development of kanji and Japanese language processing technologies: the standardization of kanji codes [漢字・日本語処理技術の発展: 漢字コードの標準化].IPSJ Magazine [情報処理], 43 (12): 1362–1367
• Tajima, Kazuo [田嶋 一夫], 1979. Problems concerning the use of the JIS kanji listing: design and handling of kanji in kanji processing systems [JIS漢字表の利用上の問題: 漢字処理システムにおける漢字のデザインと管理].Journal of Information Processing Society of Japan [情報管理], 21 (10): 753–761.
• Uchida, Tomio [内田 富雄], 1990. Establishment of JIS X 0212 (Kanji Codes for Information Interchange – Supplemental Kanji) [JIS X 0212 (情報交換用漢字符号―補助漢字) の制定].Standardization Journal [標準化ジャーナル], 20 (11): 6–11.
• Yasuoka, Kōichi [安岡 孝一], 2001a. Situation of the Newest Character Codes in Japan (former part) [日本における最新文字コード事情 (前編)].Systems, Control and Information [システム/制御/情報], 45 (9): 528–535.
• Yasuoka, Kōichi [安岡 孝一], 2001b. Situation of the Newest Character Codes in Japan (latter part) [日本における最新文字コード事情 (後編)].Systems, Control and Information [システム/制御/情報], 45 (12): 687–694.
• Yasuoka, Kōichi [安岡 孝一], 2006"Differences between the JIS kanji plan (1976) and JIS C 6226-1978" [JIS漢字案 (1976) とJIS C 6226-1978の異同] at the 17th "Computer Usage for Oriental Studies" [東洋学へのコンピュータ利用] research seminar. 3–51.
• Yasuoka, Kōichi [安岡 孝一] & Motoko Yasuoka [安岡 素子], 2006.The History of Character Codes: Europe, America, and Japan [文字符号の歴史: 欧米と日本編]. Tokyo: Kyōritsu Shuppan (ISBN 4-32012102-3).

Look upJapanese kanji by JIS X 0208 kuten code in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

• The International Register that the IPSJ/ITSCJ supervises.
  • Japanese Character Set JIS C 6226-1978
  • Japanese Character Set JIS C 6226-1983
  • Update Registration 87 Japanese Graphic Character Set for Information Interchange
• (in Japanese)Japanese Industrial Standards Committee database search (the latest standard may be read here).
• (in Japanese)Japanese Standards Association database search: (a copy of the latest standard may be purchased here).
• (in Japanese)Unification-related provisions in the JIS X 0208 and 0213 standards
• (in Japanese)Cyber Librarian – JIS kanji listing

• Character sets
• Encodings of Japanese
• JIS standards
• Computer-related introductions in 1978

• Articles containing Japanese-language text
• Articles with short description
• Short description matches Wikidata
• Articles lacking in-text citations from December 2017
• All articles lacking in-text citations
• Use dmy dates from March 2020
• Articles containing simplified Chinese-language text
• Articles containing Korean-language text
• Articles containing Chinese-language text
• Articles with obsolete information from December 2021
• All Wikipedia articles in need of updating
• All articles with vague or ambiguous time
• Vague or ambiguous time from January 2018
• All articles with dead external links
• Articles with dead external links from May 2019
• Articles with permanently dead external links
• Articles with dead external links from November 2017
• Articles with Japanese-language sources (ja)