Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Kleshas (Buddhism)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromKilesa)
In Buddhism, mental states that cloud the mind
Translations of
kleshas
Englishafflictions,
destructive emotions,
disturbing emotions,
negative emotions,
mind poisons,
etc.
Sanskritक्लेश (kleśa)
Pali(kilesa)
Burmeseကိလေသာ
(MLCTS:kḭlèθà)
Chinese煩惱
(Pinyin:fánnǎo)
Indonesianpengotor batin,
kotoran batin,
kekotoran batin
Japanese煩悩
(Rōmaji:bonnō)
Khmerកិលេស
(UNGEGN:kĕlés)
Korean번뇌
(RR:beonnoe)
Mongolianнисванис (nisvanis)
Tibetanཉོན་མོངས།
(Wylie: nyon mongs;
THL: nyönmong
)
Tagalogkilsha
Thaiกิเลส
(RTGS:Kilet)
Vietnamesephiền não
Glossary of Buddhism

Kleshas (Sanskrit:क्लेश,romanizedkleśa;Pali:किलेसkilesa;Standard Tibetan:ཉོན་མོངས།nyon mongs), inBuddhism, are mental states that cloud the mind and manifest in unwholesome actions.Kleshas include states of mind such as anxiety, fear, anger, jealousy, desire, etc. Contemporary translators use a variety of English words to translate the termkleshas, such as: afflictions, defilements, destructive emotions, disturbing emotions, negative emotions, mind poisons, and neuroses.

In the contemporary Mahayana andTheravada Buddhist traditions, the three kleshas of ignorance, attachment, and aversion are identified as the root or source of all other kleshas. These are referred to as thethree poisons in the Mahayana tradition, or as the threeunwholesome roots in the Theravada tradition.

While theearly Buddhist texts of thePali Canon do not specifically enumerate the three root kleshas, thethree poisons (and the kleshas generally) came to be seen as the very roots ofsamsaric existence.

Pali literature

[edit]
Pāli Canon
Theravāda Buddhism

In thePali Canon's discourses (sutta),kilesa is often associated with the various passions that defile bodily and mental states. In the Pali Canon'sAbhidhamma and post-canonicalPali literature, ten defilements are identified, the first three of which – greed, hatred, delusion – are considered to be the "roots" of suffering.

Sutta Piṭaka: mental hindrances

[edit]

In the Pali Canon'sSutta Piṭaka,kilesa and its correlateupakkilesa[1] are affective obstacles to the pursuit of direct knowledge (abhijñā) and wisdom (pañña).

For instance, theSamyutta Nikaya includes a collection of ten discourses (SN 27,Kilesa-sayutta) that state that any association of "desire-passion" (chanda-rāgo) with the body or mind[2] is a "defilement of mind" (cittasse'so upakkileso):

"Monks, any desire-passion with regard to the eye is a defilement of the mind. Any desire-passion with regard to the ear... the nose... the tongue... the body... the intellect is a defilement of the mind. When, with regard tothese six bases, the defilements of awareness are abandoned, then the mind is inclined torenunciation. The mind fostered by renunciation feels malleable for thedirect knowing of thosequalities worth realizing."[3]

More broadly, thefive hindrances – sensual desire (kāmacchanda), anger (byāpāda), sloth-torpor (thīna-middha), restlessness-worry (uddhacca-kukkucca), and doubt (vicikicchā) – are frequently associated withkilesa in the following (or a similar) manner:

[A]ll those Blessed Ones had first abandoned the five hindrances,
defilements of the mind that weaken wisdom ...[4]
 sabbe te bhagavanto pañcanīvarae pahāya
cetaso upakkilese paññāya dubbalīkarae ... .[5]

Additionally, in theKhuddaka Nikaya'sNiddesa,kilesa is identified as a component of or synonymous with craving (taṇhā) and lust (rāga).[6]

Abhidhamma: ten defilements and unwholesome roots

[edit]

While the Sutta Pitaka does not offer a list ofkilesa, theAbhidhamma Pitaka'sDhammasangani (Dhs. 1229ff.) andVibhanga (Vbh. XII) as well as in the post-canonicalVisuddhimagga (Vsm. XXII 49, 65) enumerate ten defilements (dasa kilesa-vatthūni) as follows:

  1. greed (lobha)
  2. hatred (dosa)
  3. delusion (moha)
  4. conceit (māna)
  5. wrong views (micchāditthi)
  6. doubt (vicikicchā)
  7. torpor (thīna)
  8. restlessness (uddhacca)
  9. shamelessness (ahirika)
  10. recklessness (anottappa)[7]

The Vibhanga also includes an eightfold list (aṭṭha kilesa-vatthūni) composed of the first eight of the above ten.[8]

Throughout Pali literature, the first threekilesa in the above tenfold Abhidhamma list (lobha dosa moha) are known as the "unwholesome roots" (akusala-mūla or the root ofakusala); and, their opposites (alobha adosa amoha) are the three "wholesome roots" (kusala-mūla or the root ofkusala).[9] The presence of such a wholesome or unwholesome root during a mental, verbal or bodily action conditions future states of consciousness and associated mental factors (seeKarma).[10]

Visuddhimagga: round of defilements

[edit]
12 Factors 3 Rounds
aging-death aspects of
vipāka
(results)[11]
 
birth 
 
becoming karma
 
clinging kilesa
 
craving 
 
feeling vipāka
(results)
 
contact 
 
sense bases 
 
name-form 
 
consciousness 
 
formations karma
 
ignorance kilesa
Figure: The "three rounds" of
Dependent Origination (Vsm. XVII, 298).

The 5th-century CEcommentarialVisuddhimagga, in its discussion of "Dependent Origination" (Pali:paticca-samuppada) (Vsm. XVII), presents different expository methods for understanding this teaching's twelve factors (nidana). One method (Vsm. XVII, 298) divides the twelve factors into three "rounds" (vaṭṭa):

  • the "round of defilements" (kilesa-vaṭṭa)
  • the "round ofkamma" (kamma-vaṭṭa)
  • the "round of results" (vipāka-vaṭṭa).[12][13]

In this framework (see Figure to the right, starting from the bottom of the Figure),kilesa ("ignorance") conditionskamma ("formations") which conditionsresults ("consciousness" through"feelings") which in turn conditionkilesa ("craving" and"clinging") which conditionkamma ("becoming") and so on.[11]Buddhaghosa (Vsm. XVII, 298) concludes:

So thisWheel of Becoming, having a triple round with these three rounds, should be understood to spin, revolving again and again, forever; for the conditions are not cut off as long as the round of defilements is not cut off.[12]

As can be seen, in this framework, the round of defilements consists of:

Elsewhere in the Visuddhimagga (Vsm. XXII, 88), in the context of the four noble persons (ariya-puggala, seeFour stages of enlightenment), the text refers to a precursor to the attainment ofnibbana as being the complete eradication of "the defilements that are the root of the round" (vaṭṭa-mūla-kilesā).[14]

Sanskrit Sravaka and Mahayana literature

[edit]

Three poisons

[edit]
Main article:Three poisons (Buddhism)

The three kleshas of ignorance, attachment and aversion are referred to as thethree poisons (Skt.triviṣa) in the Mahayana tradition and as thethree unwholesome roots (Pāli,akusala-mūla; Skt.akuśala-mūla ) in the Theravada tradition. These three poisons (or unwholesome roots) are considered to be the root of all the other kleshas.

Five poisons

[edit]

In the Mahayana tradition, the five main kleshas are referred to as thefive poisons (Sanskrit:pañca kleśaviṣa; Tibetan-Wylie:dug lnga).

The five poisons consist of thethree poisons with two additional poisons: pride and jealousy. Altogether, the five poisons are:[15][16]

Poison/KleshaSanskritPaliTibetan[15]ChineseDescriptionAlternate translations
Ignorancemoha
avidya
moha
avijja
gti mug
ma rig pa
无知

Wú zhī

Lack of discernment; not understanding the way of thingsConfusion, bewilderment, delusion
Attachmentrāgalobha'dod chags依恋

Yī liàn

Attachment or desire for what we likeDesire, passion
Aversiondveshadosazhe sdang厌恶

Yàn wù

愤怒

Fèn nù

Aversion for what we don't like, or for what prevents us from getting what we likeAnger, hatred
Pridemānamānanga rgyal虛榮

Xū róng

Having an inflated opinion of oneself and a disrespectful attitude toward othersArrogance, Conceit
Envyirshyaissāphrag dog嫉妒

Jí dù

Being unable to bear the accomplishments or good fortune of othersJealousy

Six root kleshas of the Abhidharma

[edit]

TheAbhidharma-kośa identifies six root kleshas (mūlakleśa):

In the context of theYogācāra school of Buddhism, Muller (2004: p. 207) states that the Six Klesha arise due to the "...reification of an 'imagined self' (Sanskrit:satkāya-dṛṣṭi)".[18]

Mahaparinirvana Sutra

[edit]

TheMahayana Mahaparinirvana Sutra lists approximately 50 kleshas, including those of attachment, aversion, stupidity, jealousy, pride, heedlessness, haughtiness, ill-will, quarrelsomeness, wrong livelihood, deceit, consorting with immoral friends, attachment to pleasure, to sleep, to eating, and to yawning; delighting in excessive talking and uttering lies, as well as thoughts of harm.[citation needed]

Two obscurations

[edit]

Mahayana literature often features an enumeration of "two obscurations" (Wylie:sgrib gnyis), the "obscuration of conflicting emotions" (Sanskrit:kleśa-avaraṇa, Wylie:nyon-mongs-pa'i sgrib-ma) and the "obscuration concerning the knowable" (Sanskrit:jñeya-avaraṇa, Wylie:shes-bya'i sgrib-ma).[19]

Contemporary glosses

[edit]

Contemporary translators have used many different English words to translate the termkleshas,[20] such as: afflictions, passions, destructive emotions, disturbing emotions, etc.

The following table provides brief descriptions of the term kleshas given by various contemporary Buddhist teachers and scholars:

English/Sanskrit term used[21]DescriptionSource
Afflictive emotions... those mind states that cause suffering, such as fear, hatred, anger, jealousy and so on – it's a long list!Joseph Goldstein.The Emerging Western Buddhism: An Interview with Joseph Goldstein.
Afflictive emotionsIn general, any defilement or emotion which obscures the mind. They are often summarized as three: ignorance, attachment and aversion. All other negative predispositions are produced on the basis of these three.Khenchen Konchog Gyaltshen (2009).A Complete Guide to the Buddhist Path. p. 451 (from the glossary)
AfflictionsMental factors that produce states of mental torment both immediately and in the long term. The five principal kleshas, which are sometimes called poisons, are attachment, aversion, ignorance, pride, and jealousy.Longchen Yeshe Dorje (Kangyur Rinpoche) (2010).Treasury of Precious Qualities. p. 492 (from the glossary)
Conditioning Factors or Mental AfflictionsThe processes that not only describe what we perceive, but also determine our responses.Yongey Mingyur Rinpoche (2008).The Joy of Living. p. 115
Mental afflictionsIn Tibetan a mental affliction is defined as a mental process that has the function of disrupting the equilibrium of the mind. They all have that in common, whether or not there is a strong emotional component to it.Goleman, Daniel (2008).Destructive Emotions: A Scientific Dialogue with the Dalai Lama. Kindle Locations 2553–2555.
Destructive emotionsFundamentally, a destructive emotion—which is also referred to as an ‘obscuring’ or ‘afflictive’ mental factor—is something that prevents the mind from ascertaining reality as it is. With a destructive emotion, there will always be a gap between the way things appear and the ways things are.Goleman, Daniel (2008).Destructive Emotions: A Scientific Dialogue with the Dalai Lama. Kindle Locations 1779–1781.
DefilementsThese are unskilful factors such as greed, hate, delusion, opinionatedness and lack of moral concern. Whereas the term ‘hindrance’ refers to five sticking points, ‘defilement’ is often used without any definite list, but to refer to any function of the mind which is led by unskilful factors.Ajahn Sucitto (2011).Meditation, A Way of Awakening. Amaravati Publications. p. 263. (from the glossary)
KleshasKleshas are the strong conflicting emotions that spin off and heighten when we get caught by aversion and attraction.Pema Chodron.Signs of Spiritual Progress. Shambhala Sun.
KleshasKleshas are properties that dull the mind and are the basis for all unwholesome actions. The three main kleshas are passion, aggression, and ignorance.Chögyam Trungpa.The Truth of Suffering and the Path of Liberation. Edited by Judy L. Lief. Shambhala. p. 134 (from the glossary)
KleshasThe basic idea is that certain powerful reactions have the capacity to take hold of us and drive our behavior. We believe in these reactions more than we believe in anything else, and they become the means by which we both hide from ourselves and attempt to cope with a world of ceaseless change and unpredictability. The three poisons of greed, hatred, and ignorance are the classic Buddhist examples, but others include conceit, skeptical doubt, and so-called "speculative" views ...Mark Epstein.Going on Being: Buddhism and the Way of Change, a Positive Psychology for the West.http://www.quietspaces.com/kleshas.html
KleshasThe emotional obscurations (in contrast to intellectual obscurations), usually translated as "poisons" or "defilements." The three main kleshas are ignorance, hatred, and desire. The five kleshas include these three along with pride and envy.

Thrangu Rinpoche (1993).The Practice of Tranquility & Insight: A Guide to Tibetan Buddhist Mediation (p. 152). Snow Lion. Kindle Edition. p. 152 (from the glossary)

Overcoming the kleshas

[edit]

All Buddhist schools teach that through Tranquility (Samatha) meditation the kilesas are pacified, though not eradicated, and through Insight (Vipassana) the true nature of the kilesas and the mind itself is understood. When the empty nature of the Self and the Mind is fully understood, there is no longer a root for the disturbing emotions to be attached to, and the disturbing emotions lose their power to distract the mind.[citation needed]

Alternative translations

[edit]

The termkleshas has been translated into English as:

  • Afflictions
  • Mental afflictions
  • Mental disturbances
  • Afflictive emotions
  • Conditioning factors
  • Destructive emotions
  • Defiled emotions
  • Defilements
  • Dissonant emotions
  • Disturbing emotions
  • Disturbing emotions and attitudes
  • Negative emotions
  • Dissonant mental states
  • Kleshas
  • Passions
  • Poisons
  • Mind poisons
  • Worldly desires[22]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Beyond the etymological relationship between and semantic closeness ofkilesa andupakkilesa (e.g., see Rhys Davids & Stede, 1921–25, p. 139, entry forupakkilesa at[1]), the below-referencedSamyutta Nikaya collection entitled "Kilesa-sayutta" (SN 27) does not usekilesa in its actual suttas but, in fact,upakkilesa. Bodhi (2000), pp. 1012–14, 1100n. 273, specifically makes note of the lexical differences between these two Pali words and chooses to translatekilesa as "defilement" andupakkilesa as "corruption." Similar, in Bodhi (2000), p. 1642, SN 47.12,upakkilesa is translated as "corruption" whereas, as indicated below, in Bodhi (2005), p. 416, this same Pali word in the same sutta is translated as "defilement." Consistent with Bodhi (2005), as seen below, Thanissaro (1994) also translatesupakkilesa as "defilement."The related correlatesankilesa (orsakilesa) is also translated as "defilement" by Bodhi (e.g., 2000, pp. 903–4; 2005, pp. 55–6),Thanissaro (2004) and Rhys Davids & Stede (1921-5,entry for "Sankilesa"). InSN 22.60 (Bodhi, 2000, pp. 903–4),sankilesa is contextualized by: "By being enamoured with [form], [beings] are captivated by it, and by being captivated by it they are defiled." In this sutta,sankilesa is juxtaposed with purification (visuddhi) which is contextualized by: "Experiencing revulsion [in the impermanence of form's pleasure], [beings] become dispassionate, and through dispassion they are purified."
  2. ^In particular, thissayutta contextualizeskilesa vis-à-vis the six internal and external "sense bases" (ayatana) and their mental concomitants (the six classes ofconsciousness,contact,feeling andcraving, see the section on the"six sextets"), the six primary "elements" (dhātu, cf.mahābhūta), and the five "aggregates" (khandha).
  3. ^SN 27.1(trans. Thanissaro, 1994). Note that the phrase that Thanissaro translates as "defilement ofawareness" here iscetaso upakkileso; Bodhi (2000), p. 1012, simply translates this as "mental corruption" (underlining added for clarity).
  4. ^Translation from Bodhi (2005), p. 416. Bodhi (2005, pp. 417, 457n. 58) states that this is fromSN 47.12, as well asDN 16 and DN 28. A similar phrase can be found in DN 28, etc.
  5. ^Pali, based on a search for "pahāya cetaso upakkilese," retrieved from "BodhgayaNews" athttp://www.bodhgayanews.net/pitakaresults.php?title=&start=0&to=10&searchstring=pahāya%20cetaso%20upakkilese[permanent dead link] (32 matches found).
  6. ^See Rhys Davids & Stede (1921–5), pp. 216–7, entry for "Kilesa," retrieved 2008-02-09 from "University of Chicago" at[2].
  7. ^Rhys Davids & Stede (1921–5), p. 217; and, Nyanatiloka (1988), entry for "kilesa," retrieved 2008-02-09 from "BuddhaSasana" athttp://www.buddhanet.net/budsas/ebud/bud-dict/dic3_k.htmArchived 2012-03-28 at theWayback Machine.
  8. ^Rhys Davids & Stede (1921–25), p. 217.
  9. ^In addition to frequent reference in the Abhidhamma and post-canonical Pali literature, references to the unwholesome roots (akusala-mūla) are sprinkled throughout theSutta Pitaka. For instance, in theDigha Nikaya, it can be found in DN 33 (D iii.215) and DN 34 (D iii.275); in theMajjhima Nikaya, it is the first of several topics discussed by Ven.Sariputta in the well-knownSammādiṭṭhi Sutta ("Right View Discourse," MN 9); and, in theItivuttaka, a brief discourse on three unwholesome roots starts off the "Section of the Threes" (Iti. 50). However, innone of these Sutta Pitaka texts are the three unwholesome roots referred to askilesa. Such an association appears to begin in the Abhidhamma texts.
  10. ^Nyanatiloka (1988), entry for "mūla," retrieved 2008-02-09 from "BuddhaSasana" athttp://www.buddhanet.net/budsas/ebud/bud-dict/dic3_m.htm.
  11. ^abStrictly speaking, in this framework theVisuddhimagga (Vsm. XVII, 298) does notexplicitly identify "birth" (jāti) and "aging-death" (jarāmaraa) with results (vipāka). Nonetheless, in the preceding paragraph (Vsm. XVII, 297),Buddhaghosa writes: "And in the future fivefold fruit: the five beginning with consciousness. These are expressed by the term 'birth'. But 'ageing-and-death' is the ageing and the death of these [five] themselves" (Ñāamoli, 1991, p. 599, v. 297; square-brackets in original). Thus, "birth" and "ageing and death" become correlates or expressions of the five-fold "results" sequence.
  12. ^abcÑāamoli (1991), p. 599, v. 298.
  13. ^Cf. theparacanonicalNettipakaraa's "round of suffering, round of action, round of defilements" (dukkhavaṭṭo kammavaṭṭo kilesavaṭṭo) (Nett. i.95)."Archived copy". Archived fromthe original on 2011-07-19. Retrieved2008-07-16.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  14. ^Ñāṇamoli (1991), p. 715.
  15. ^abPadmakara (1998), p. 336, 414. (from the glossary)
  16. ^Longchen Yeshe Dorje (Kangyur Rinpoche) (2010). p. 492
  17. ^Guenther (1975), Kindle Location 321.
  18. ^Muller (2004).
  19. ^Dorje, Jikdrel Yeshe (Dudjom Rinpoche, author), translated and edited:Gyurme Dorje andMatthew Kapstein (1991).The Nyingma School of Tibetan Buddhism: Its Fundamentals and History. Boston, USA: Wisdom Publications.ISBN 0-86171-199-8, p. 107(Enumerations).
  20. ^Epstein, Mark (2009)http://www.quietspaces.com/kleshas.html
  21. ^This column indicates the English words used by each of these teachers as a translation for the termkleshas.
  22. ^Translation of the Japanese the termBonno:"WWWJDIC: Text/Word Translation". Archived fromthe original on 2010-10-24. Retrieved2010-09-05.

Sources

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Wikiquote has quotations related toKleshas (Buddhism).
   Topics inBuddhism   
Foundations
The Buddha
Bodhisattvas
Disciples
Key concepts
Cosmology
Branches
Practices
Nirvana
Monasticism
Major figures
Texts
Countries
History
Philosophy
Culture
Miscellaneous
Comparison
Lists
Authority control databases: NationalEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kleshas_(Buddhism)&oldid=1271974024"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp