 Intel Core 2 QuadKentsfield Q6600 | |
| General information | |
|---|---|
| Launched | 2006 |
| Discontinued | 2009 |
| Marketed by | Intel |
| Designed by | Intel |
| Common manufacturer |
|
| CPUID code | 06Fx |
| Product code | 80562 |
| Performance | |
| Max.CPUclock rate | 0.09 GHz to 3.00 GHz |
| FSB speeds | 1066 MT/s to 1333 MT/s |
| Physical specifications | |
| Cores |
|
| Socket | |
| Cache | |
| L2 cache | 2 × 4 MiB |
| Architecture and classification | |
| Application | Desktop, UP Server |
| Technology node | 65 nm |
| Microarchitecture | Core |
| Instruction set | x86-64 |
| Products, models, variants | |
| Brand names |
|
| Variant | |
| History | |
| Predecessor | Presler |
| Successor | Yorkfield |
Kentsfield is the code name of the firstIntel desktop Core 2 Quad and quad-coreXeon CPUs,[1] released on November 2, 2006. The top-of-the-line Kentsfields were Core 2 Extreme models numberedQX6xx0, while the mainstream Core 2 Quad models were numberedQ6x00. All of them featured two 8 MiB L2cache. The mainstream 65 nanometer Core 2 Quad Q6600, clocked at 2.4 GHz, was launched on January 8, 2007 at US$851 (reduced to US$530 on April 7, 2007). July 22, 2007 marked the release of the Core 2 Quad Q6700 and Core 2 Extreme QX6850 Kentsfields at US$530 and US$999 respectively; the price of the Q6600 was later reduced to US$266.[2] Both Kentsfield and Kentsfield XE use product code 80562.
| Processor | Brand name | Model (list) | Cores | L2 cache | Socket | TDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kentsfield | Xeon | 3xxx | 4 | 2 × 4 MiB | LGA 775 | 95–105 W |
| Kentsfield | Xeon | 5xxx | 4 | 2 × 4 MiB | LGA 775 | 95–105 W |
| Kentsfield | Core 2 Quad | Q6xxx | 4 | 2 × 4 MiB | LGA 775 | 95–105 W |
| Kentsfield XE | Core 2 Extreme | QX6xxx | 4 | 2 × 4 MiB | LGA 775 | 130 W |
Analogous to thePentium D branded CPUs, the Kentsfields comprise two separate silicon dies (each equivalent to a single Core 2 Duo) on oneMCM.[3] This results in lower costs, but a lesser share of the bandwidth from each of the CPUs to thenorthbridge than if the dies were each to sit in separate sockets as is the case for theAMD Quad FX platform.[4] As might be predicted from the two-die MCM configuration, thethermal design power of the Kentsfield (QX6800 - 130 watts,[5]QX6700 - 130 W,[6]Q6600 - 105 W[7]) is double that of its similarly clocked Core 2 Duo counterpart.
Themultiple cores of the Kentsfield mostly benefits applications that can easily be broken into a small number of parallelthreads (such as audio and videotranscoding,data compression,video editing,3D rendering andray-tracing). To take a specific example, multi-threaded games such asCrysis andGears of War which must perform multiple simultaneous tasks such as AI, audio and physics benefit from quad-core CPUs.[8] In such cases, the processing performance may increase relative to that of a single-CPU system by a factor approaching the number of CPUs. This should, however, be considered an upper limit as it assumes that the user-level software is properly threaded. Alternatively, if the system uses integrated graphics with no or limited shader support (such as Intel's GMA 9xx and 31xx series), and a game uses only 1 or 2 cores, the extra cores could be given the task of emulating pixel and or vertex shading, improving the game's graphics quality. Since the L2 cache is separated in two parts, one for each dual core module, this would also make parallelizing the shading and other general purpose tasks easier compared to on single die quad core CPUs with fully shared L2 cache.
To return to the above mentioned gaming example, some tests have demonstrated that Crysis fails to take advantage of more than two cores at any given time.[9] On the other hand, the impact of this issue on broader system performance can be significantly reduced on systems which frequently handle numerous unrelated simultaneous tasks such as multi-user environments or desktops which execute background processes while the user is active, or even video encoding if hardware encoding is not available or not desired (software encoding can be more bitrate efficient than hardware encoding) and there are resources available for it. There is still, however, some overhead involved in coordinating execution of multiple processes or threads and scheduling them on multiple CPUs which scales with the number of threads/CPUs. Finally, on the hardware level there exists the possibility of bottlenecks arising from the sharing of memory and/or I/O bandwidth between processors.
The firstKentsfield XE processor, the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 (product code 80562) with a clock speed of 2.67 GHz, was released on November 2, 2006 at US$999.[10][11][12][13][14] It was discontinued on January 4, 2008.[15] It featured theKentsfield XE core and complemented the Core 2 Extreme X6800 dual-core processor based on theConroe XE core. Similarly to the previous dual-core Extreme processors, CPUs with theKentsfield XE core had unlocked multipliers.
The Core 2 Extreme QX6800 clocked at 2.93 GHz was released on April 8, 2007, at US$1,199. It had a 130 WTDP thermal envelope, and was intended for high end OEM-only systems.[16]
The Core 2 Extreme QX6850 clocked at 3.0 GHz was launched on July 22, 2007, at US$999. It featured a faster 1333 MT/sFSB. Simultaneously, the previously available Core 2 Extreme QX6700 had its price reduced.
The dual-core desktop version of Kentsfield isConroe. The server versions of Kentsfield are the dual-processorClovertown (Xeon 53xx) and the multi-processorTigerton (Xeon 73xx).
Kentsfield was replaced by the 45 nmYorkfield processor.