AKammback—also known as aKamm tail orK-tail—is anautomotive styling feature wherein the rear of the car slopes downwards before being abruptly cut off with a vertical or near-vertical surface. A Kammback reduces aerodynamic drag, thus improving efficiency and reducing fuel consumption,[1] while maintaining a practical shape for a vehicle.
The Kammback is named after GermanaerodynamicistWunibald Kamm for his work developing the design in the 1930s.
Some vehicles incorporate the kammback design based on aerodynamic principles, while some use a cut-off tail as a design or marketing feature.
.jpg)
.jpg)
As the speed of cars increased during the 1920s and 1930s, designers observed and began to apply the principles ofautomotive aerodynamics.[2] Asaerodynamic drag increases, more energy, and thus more fuel, is required to propel the vehicle.[3]
In 1922,Paul Jaray patented a car based on a teardrop profile (i.e. with a rounded nose and long, tapered tail) to minimize the aerodynamic drag that is created at higher speeds.[4][5] Thestreamliner vehicles of the mid 1930s—such as theTatra 77,Chrysler Airflow andLincoln-Zephyr—were designed according to these discoveries.
However, the long tail was not a practical shape for a car, so automotive designers sought other solutions. In 1935, German aircraft designerGeorg Hans Madelung showed alternatives to minimize drag without a long tail.[6] In 1936, a similar theory was applied to cars after Baron Reinhard Koenig-Fachsenfeld developed a smooth roofline shape with an abrupt end at a vertical surface, effective in achieving low amounts of drag similar to a streamlined body.[5][7][8] He worked on an aerodynamic design for a bus, and Koenig-Fachsenfeld patented the idea.[9] Koenig-Fachsenfeld worked withWunibald Kamm at Stuttgart University, investigating vehicle shapes to "provide a good compromise between everyday utility (e.g. vehicle length and interior dimensions) and an attractive drag coefficient".[5][7] In addition to aerodynamic efficiency, Kamm emphasized vehicle stability in his design,[7] mathematically and empirically proving the effectiveness of the design.[10]
In 1938, Kamm produced a prototype using a Kammback shape, based on aBMW 328.[11] The Kammback, along with other aerodynamic modifications, gave the prototype a drag coefficient of 0.25.[12]
The earliest mass-produced cars using Kammback principles were the 1949–1951Nash Airflyte in the United States and the 1952–1955Borgward Hansa 2400 in Europe.[7]
The ideal shape to minimize drag is a "teardrop," a smoothairfoil-like shape, but it is not practical for road vehicles because of size constraints.[1] However, researchers, including Kamm, found that abruptly cutting off the tail resulted in a minimal increase in drag.[5] The reason for this is that a turbulentwake region forms behind the vertical surface at the rear of the car. This wake region mimics the effect of the tapered tail in that air in the free stream does not enter this region (avoidingboundary layer separation); therefore, smooth airflow is maintained, minimizing drag.[11]
Kamm's design is based on the tail being truncated at the point where thecross section area is 50% of the car's maximum cross-section,[5][13] which Kamm found represented a good compromise, as by that point the turbulence typical of flat-back vehicles had been mostly eliminated at typical speeds.
The Kammback presented a partial solution to the problem of aerodynamic lift, which was becoming severe assports car racing speeds increased during the 1950s. The design paradigm of sloping the tail to reduce drag was carried to an extreme on cars such as theCunningham C-5R,[14] resulting in an airfoil effect lifting the rear of the car at speed and so running the risk of instability or loss of control. The Kammback decreased the area of the lifting surface while creating a low-pressure zone underneath the tail.
Some studies showed that the addition of a rear spoiler to a Kammback design was not beneficial because the overall drag increased with the angles that were studied.[1]
.jpg)
_liftback_(2011-12-06)_02.jpg)
_3.0_TFSI_quattro_hatchback_(2016-01-07)_02.jpg)
In 1959, the Kammback came into use on full-body racing cars as an anti-lift measure, and within a few years would be used on virtually all such vehicles. The design had a resurgence in the early 2000s as a method to reduce fuel consumption inhybrid electric vehicles.
Several cars have been marketed as Kammbacks despite their profiles not adhering to the aerodynamic philosophy of a true Kammback. These models include the 1971–1977Chevrolet Vega Kammback wagon,[15] the 1981–1982AMC Eagle Kammback,[16][17][18][19] theAMC AMX-GT, and thePontiac Firebird–based "Type K" concept cars.[20][21][22][23][24]
Some models that are marketed as "coupes"—such asBMW andMercedes-BenzSUVs like theX6 andGLC Coupé—"use a sort-of Kammback shape, though their tail ends have a few more lumps and bumps than a proper Kammback ought to have."[25]
Cars that have had a Kammback include:
...with a chopped-off rear end that was known as a Kamm-back.
Kamm was a key figure in the design of the body for this . . .car, which was built specially for the Mille Miglia 1940."
Giovanni Lurani and Franco Cortes have to retire on lap seven with their BMW 328 'Mille Miglia' Kamm coupe.
...cut-off 'Kamm' tail
...Kamm-back tail, both reminiscent of the original Saab Sonett.
...a cut-off Kamm-theory tail...
At the back of the Insight the teardrop shape is abruptly cut off in what is called the Kamm effect.
...featuring the same Kammback profile as the Prius and Prius V hatchbacks...
...a Kammback layout, meaning the roof slopes gradually backward where it meets up with a fairly tall/vertical tail section.
Slick "four-door coupes" are increasingly popular, and we've seen several such cars adopt a Kammback shape, including the Audi A7/S7/RS7 family and the Kia Stinger..