KRAS (Kirsten ratsarcoma virus) is a gene that provides instructions for making a protein calledK-Ras, a part of theRAS/MAPK pathway. The protein relays signals from outside the cell to the cell's nucleus. These signals instruct the cell to grow and divide (proliferate) or to mature and take on specialized functions (differentiate). It is calledKRAS because it was first identified as a viraloncogene in theKirstenRAtSarcoma virus.[5] The oncogene identified was derived from a cellular genome, soKRAS, when found in a cellular genome, is called aproto-oncogene.
The K-Ras protein is aGTPase, a class ofenzymes which convert thenucleotideguanosine triphosphate (GTP) intoguanosine diphosphate (GDP). In this way the K-Ras protein acts like aswitch that is turned on and off by the GTP and GDP molecules. To transmit signals, it must be turned on by attaching (binding) to a molecule of GTP. The K-Ras protein is turned off (inactivated) when it converts the GTP to GDP. When the protein is bound to GDP, it does not relay signals to the nucleus.
Thegene product ofKRAS, the K-Ras protein, was first found as a p21 GTPase.[6][7] Like other members of theras subfamily of GTPases, the K-Ras protein is an early player in manysignal transduction pathways. K-Ras is usually tethered tocell membranes because of thefarnesylation of itsC-terminus. There are two protein products of theKRAS gene in mammalian cells that result from the use of alternativeexon 4 (exon 4A and 4B respectively): K-Ras4A and K-Ras4B. These proteins have different structures in their C-terminal region and use different mechanisms to localize to cellular membranes, including theplasma membrane.[8]
KRAS acts as a molecular on/off switch, usingprotein dynamics. Once it isallosterically activated, it recruits and activates proteins necessary for the propagation ofgrowth factors, as well as othercell signaling receptors likec-Raf andPI 3-kinase. KRASupregulates theGLUT1 glucose transporter, thereby contributing to theWarburg effect in cancer cells.[9] KRAS binds toGTP in its active state. It also possesses an intrinsic enzymatic activity which cleaves the terminal phosphate of the nucleotide, converting it toGDP. Upon conversion of GTP to GDP, KRAS is deactivated. The rate of conversion is usually slow, but can be increased dramatically by an accessory protein of theGTPase-activating protein (GAP) class, for exampleRasGAP. In turn, KRAS can bind to proteins of theGuanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor (GEF) class (such asSOS1), which forces the release of bound nucleotide (GDP). Subsequently, KRAS binds GTP present in thecytosol and the GEF is released from ras-GTP.
Other members of the Ras family include:HRAS andNRAS. These proteins all are regulated in the same manner and appear to differ in their sites of action within the cell.
The impact of KRAS mutations is heavily dependent on the order of mutations. PrimaryKRAS mutations generally lead to a self-limiting hyperplastic or borderline lesion, but if they occur after a previousAPC mutation it often progresses to cancer.[18] KRAS mutations are more commonly observed in cecal cancers than colorectal cancers located in any other places from ascending colon to rectum.[19][20]
As of 2006, KRAS mutation was predictive of a very poor response topanitumumab (Vectibix) andcetuximab (Erbitux) therapy in colorectal cancer.[21]
As of 2008, the most reliable way to predict whether a colorectal cancer patient will respond to one of theEGFR-inhibiting drugs was to test for certain "activating" mutations in the gene that encodes KRAS, which occurs in 30%–50% of colorectal cancers. Studies show patients whose tumors express the mutated version of theKRAS gene will not respond to cetuximab or panitumumab.[22]
As of 2009, although presence of the wild-type (or normal)KRAS gene does not guarantee that these drugs will work, a number of large studies[23][24] had shown that cetuximab had efficacy in mCRC patients with KRAS wild-type tumors. In the Phase III CRYSTAL study, published in 2009, patients with the wild-typeKRAS gene treated with Erbitux plus chemotherapy showed a response rate of up to 59% compared to those treated withchemotherapy alone. Patients with theKRAS wild-type gene also showed a 32% decreased risk of disease progression compared to patients receiving chemotherapy alone.[24]
As of 2012, it was known that emergence of KRAS mutations was a frequent driver of acquired resistance tocetuximab anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancers. The emergence of KRAS mutant clones can be detected non-invasively[how?] months before radiographic progression. It suggests to perform an early initiation of aMEK inhibitor as a rational strategy for delaying or reversing drug resistance.[25]
KRAS gene can also beamplified in colorectal cancer and tumors harboring this genetic lesion are not responsive toEGFR inhibitors. Although KRAS amplification is infrequent in colorectal cancer, as of 2013 it was hypothesized to be responsible for precluding response to anti-EGFR treatment in some patients.[26] As of 2015 amplification of wild-type Kras has also been observed inovarian,[27]gastric,uterine, andlung cancers.[28]
Whether a patient is positive or negative for a mutation in theepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) will predict how patients will respond to certain EGFR antagonists such aserlotinib (Tarceva) orgefitinib (Iressa). Patients who harbor an EGFR mutation have a 60% response rate to erlotinib. However, the mutation of KRAS and EGFR are generally mutually exclusive.[29][30][31] Lung cancer patients who are positive for KRAS mutation (and the EGFR status would be wild type) have a low response rate to erlotinib or gefitinib estimated at 5% or less.[29]
Different types of data including mutation status and gene expression did not have a significant prognostic power.[32] No correlation to survival was observed in 72% of all studies with KRAS sequencing performed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).[32] However, KRAS mutations can not only affect the gene itself and the expression of the corresponding protein, but can also influence the expression of other downstream genes involved in crucial pathways regulatingcell growth,differentiation andapoptosis. The different expression of these genes inKRAS-mutant tumors might have a more prominent role in affecting patient's clinical outcomes.[32]
A 2008 paper published inCancer Research concluded that the in vivo administration of the compound oncrasin-1 "suppressed the growth of K-ras mutant human lung tumorxenografts by >70% and prolonged the survival of nude mice bearing these tumors, without causing detectable toxicity", and that the "results indicate that oncrasin-1 or its active analogues could be a novel class of anticancer agents which effectively kill K-Ras mutant cancer cells."[33]
Over 90% ofpancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) have a KRAS mutation.[34][35][36] There is one approved drug,sotorasib, that targets the KRAS G12C mutation, but only ~1% of PDACs have this mutation.[34] Another KRAS inhibitor,MRTX1133 targets G12D mutation which is present in over 40% of PDACs[37][38] is currently in clinical trials to treat solid tumors including pancreatic adenocarcinoma.[39]
In July 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updated the labels of two anti-EGFRmonoclonal antibody drugs indicated for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer,panitumumab (Vectibix) andcetuximab (Erbitux), to include information aboutKRAS mutations.[40]
In 2012, the FDA cleared a genetic test byQIAGEN named therascreenKRAS test, designed to detect the presence of seven mutations in theKRAS gene in colorectal cancer cells. This test aids physicians in identifying patients with metastatic colorectal cancer for treatment with Erbitux. The presence of KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer tissue indicates that the patient may not benefit from treatment with Erbitux. If the test result indicates that the KRAS mutations are absent in the colorectal cancer cells, then the patient may be considered for treatment with Erbitux.[41]
Hyperactivating KRAS mutations are known to underlie the pathogenesis of up to 20% of human cancers, making KRAS a desirable target for cancer therapies.[42] However, development of KRAS-targeting therapies was elusive for decades and KRAS was long referred to as undruggable.[43] However,Kevan M. Shokat and his colleagues, asHoward Hughes Medical Institute investigators at theUniversity of California, discovered a druggable "Achilles heel" on KRAS (specifically the KRAS-G12C mutant), which enabled the development of the first KRAS-targeting drugs by pharmaceutical companies based on their breakthrough findings.[44][45][46][47]
Currently, a few KRAS-targeting drugs are approved for clinical use and, many clinical trials are underway, exploring the therapeutic potential of a wide variety of KRAS-targeting drugs.
As of October 2025, there are clinical trials exploring the therapeutic potential of several pan-KRAS targeting drugs includingdaraxonrasib,KO-2806,AMG410, and the peptide inhibitorLUNA18.
Surface model of a KRASG12C protein, showing a GDP molecule (orange) in its high-affinity binding site and thecovalent inhibitorsotorasib (aqua) occupying an adjacent "cryptic" binding pocket. Sotorasib forms an irreversible bond with acysteine residue and disrupts function of the mutated protein. FromPDB:6OIM.[50][51]
One fairly frequent driver mutation is KRASG12C.Electrophilic KRAS inhibitors can form irreversiblecovalent bonds withnucleophilic sulfur atom of Cys-12 and hence selectively target KRASG12C and leave wild-type KRAS untouched.[52]
A phase Ia/Ib dose escalation trial of the oral selectiveKRAS G12C inhibitordivarasib was published in 2023, where the drug was tested in non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and other solid tumors withKRAS G12C mutations.[58] It continues in phase I and II studies for several cancer types as of August 2023.[59][60][61][62]
The most commonKRAS mutation is G12D which is estimated to be present in up to 37% pancreatic cancers and over 12% of colorectal cancers. As of October 2025, there are several G12D targeting drugs in clinical or preclinical trials including Zoldonrasib, INCB161734, LY3962673, AZD0022, and the PROTAC ASP3082.
In 2021, the first clinical trial of a gene therapy targeting KRAS G12D was recruiting patients, sponsored by theNational Cancer Institute.[63] In June 2022, a case report was published about a 71-year-old woman with metastatic pancreatic cancer after extensive treatment (Whipple Surgery, radiation and multiple agent chemotherapy) who received a single infusion ofengineered T cells directed to both the G12D mutation and an HLA allele. Her tumor regressed persistently. But another similarly treated patient died from the cancer.[64]
^Markov K (1979). "Current state of our knowledge about prostaglandins".Patologicheskaia Fiziologiia I Eksperimental'naia Terapiia (5):3–15.PMID228228.
^Kranenburg O (November 2005). "The KRAS oncogene: past, present, and future".Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer.1756 (2):81–82.doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2005.10.001.PMID16269215.
^Welman A, Burger MM, Hagmann J (September 2000). "Structure and function of the C-terminal hypervariable region of K-Ras4B in plasma membrane targetting and transformation".Oncogene.19 (40):4582–4591.doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1203818.PMID11030147.S2CID20878317.
^Schubbert S, Zenker M, Rowe SL, Böll S, Klein C, Bollag G, et al. (March 2006). "Germline KRAS mutations cause Noonan syndrome".Nature Genetics.38 (3):331–336.doi:10.1038/ng1748.PMID16474405.S2CID8193354.
^Niihori T, Aoki Y, Narumi Y, Neri G, Cavé H, Verloes A, et al. (March 2006). "Germline KRAS and BRAF mutations in cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome".Nature Genetics.38 (3):294–296.doi:10.1038/ng1749.PMID16474404.S2CID28915489.
^Almoguera C, Shibata D, Forrester K, Martin J, Arnheim N, Perucho M (May 1988). "Most human carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas contain mutant c-K-ras genes".Cell.53 (4):549–554.doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90571-5.PMID2453289.S2CID22457575.
^Tam IY, Chung LP, Suen WS, Wang E, Wong MC, Ho KK, et al. (March 2006). "Distinct epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS mutation patterns in non-small cell lung cancer patients with different tobacco exposure and clinicopathologic features".Clinical Cancer Research.12 (5):1647–1653.doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1981.PMID16533793.S2CID14795296.
^Lièvre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D, Boige V, Landi B, Emile JF, et al. (April 2006). "KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer".Cancer Research.66 (8):3992–3995.doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0191.PMID16618717.
^van Epps HL (Winter 2008)."Bittersweet Gene". CURE (Cancer Updates, Research and Education). Archived fromthe original on 2009-02-07.
^Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A, Hartmann JT, Aparicio J, de Braud F, et al. (February 2009). "Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer".Journal of Clinical Oncology.27 (5):663–671.doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8397.hdl:2434/652169.PMID19114683.
^Valtorta E, Misale S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Nagtegaal ID, Paraf F, Lauricella C, et al. (September 2013). "KRAS gene amplification in colorectal cancer and impact on response to EGFR-targeted therapy".International Journal of Cancer.133 (5):1259–1265.doi:10.1002/ijc.28106.hdl:2318/132493.PMID23404247.S2CID1791682.
^abSuda K, Tomizawa K, Mitsudomi T (March 2010). "Biological and clinical significance of KRAS mutations in lung cancer: an oncogenic driver that contrasts with EGFR mutation".Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.29 (1):49–60.doi:10.1007/s10555-010-9209-4.PMID20108024.S2CID19626219.
^Riely GJ, Marks J, Pao W (April 2009). "KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer".Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society.6 (2):201–205.doi:10.1513/pats.200809-107LC.PMID19349489.
^Ostrem JM, Shokat KM (November 2016). "Direct small-molecule inhibitors of KRAS: from structural insights to mechanism-based design".Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery.15 (11):771–785.doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.139.PMID27469033.
^Sabt A, Tawfik HO, Khaleel EF, Badi RM, Ibrahim HA, Elkaeed EB, et al. (December 2024). "An overview of recent advancements in small molecules suppression of oncogenic signaling of K-RAS: an updated review".Molecular Diversity.28 (6):4581–4608.doi:10.1007/s11030-023-10777-6.PMID38289431.
^Clinical trial numberNCT03101839 for "Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of AZD4785 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours" atClinicalTrials.gov
^Sacher A, LoRusso P, Patel MR, Miller WH, Garralda E, Forster MD, et al. (August 2023). "Single-Agent Divarasib (GDC-6036) in Solid Tumors with aKRAS G12C Mutation".The New England Journal of Medicine.389 (8):710–721.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2303810.hdl:2268/311523.PMID37611121.S2CID261098837.
Kahn S, Yamamoto F, Almoguera C, Winter E, Forrester K, Jordano J, et al. (1987). "The c-K-ras gene and human cancer (review)".Anticancer Research.7 (4A):639–652.PMID3310850.
Yamamoto F, Nakano H, Neville C, Perucho M (1985). "Structure and mechanisms of activation of c-K-ras oncogenes in human lung cancer".Progress in Medical Virology.32:101–114.PMID3895297.
Porta M, Ayude D, Alguacil J, Jariod M (February 2003). "Exploring environmental causes of altered ras effects: fragmentation plus integration?".Molecular Carcinogenesis.36 (2):45–52.doi:10.1002/mc.10093.PMID12557259.S2CID23937262.
Smakman N, Borel Rinkes IH, Voest EE, Kranenburg O (November 2005). "Control of colorectal metastasis formation by K-Ras".Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer.1756 (2):103–114.doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2005.07.001.PMID16098678.
Castagnola P, Giaretti W (November 2005). "Mutant KRAS, chromosomal instability and prognosis in colorectal cancer".Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer.1756 (2):115–125.doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2005.06.003.PMID16112461.
Deramaudt T, Rustgi AK (November 2005). "Mutant KRAS in the initiation of pancreatic cancer".Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer.1756 (2):97–101.doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2005.08.003.PMID16169155.
Pretlow TP, Pretlow TG (November 2005). "Mutant KRAS in aberrant crypt foci (ACF): initiation of colorectal cancer?".Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer.1756 (2):83–96.doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2005.06.002.PMID16219426.
Su YH, Wang M, Aiamkitsumrit B, Brenner DE, Block TM (2005). "Detection of a K-ras mutation in urine of patients with colorectal cancer".Cancer Biomarkers.1 (2–3):177–182.doi:10.3233/CBM-2005-12-305.PMID17192038.
Domagała P, Hybiak J, Sulżyc-Bielicka V, Cybulski C, Ryś J, Domagała W (November 2012). "KRAS mutation testing in colorectal cancer as an example of the pathologist's role in personalized targeted therapy: a practical approach".Polish Journal of Pathology.63 (3):145–164.arXiv:1305.1286.doi:10.5114/PJP.2012.31499.PMID23161231.S2CID17666526.
121p: STRUKTUR UND GUANOSINTRIPHOSPHAT-HYDROLYSEMECHANISMUS DES C-TERMINAL VERKUERZTEN MENSCHLICHEN KREBSPROTEINS P21-H-RAS
1aa9: HUMAN C-HA-RAS(1-171)(DOT)GDP, NMR, MINIMIZED AVERAGE STRUCTURE
1agp: THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES AND PROPERTIES OF A TRANSFORMING AND A NONTRANSFORMING GLY-12 MUTANT OF P21-H-RAS
1bkd: COMPLEX OF HUMAN H-RAS WITH HUMAN SOS-1
1clu: H-RAS COMPLEXED WITH DIAMINOBENZOPHENONE-BETA,GAMMA-IMIDO-GTP
1crp: THE SOLUTION STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS OF RAS P21. GDP DETERMINED BY HETERONUCLEAR THREE AND FOUR DIMENSIONAL NMR SPECTROSCOPY
1crq: THE SOLUTION STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS OF RAS P21. GDP DETERMINED BY HETERONUCLEAR THREE AND FOUR DIMENSIONAL NMR SPECTROSCOPY
1crr: THE SOLUTION STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS OF RAS P21. GDP DETERMINED BY HETERONUCLEAR THREE AND FOUR DIMENSIONAL NMR SPECTROSCOPY
1ctq: STRUCTURE OF P21RAS IN COMPLEX WITH GPPNHP AT 100 K
1gnp: X-RAY CRYSTAL STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF THE CATALYTIC DOMAIN OF THE ONCOGENE PRODUCT P21H-RAS COMPLEXED WITH CAGED GTP AND MANT DGPPNHP
1gnq: X-RAY CRYSTAL STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF THE CATALYTIC DOMAIN OF THE ONCOGENE PRODUCT P21H-RAS COMPLEXED WITH CAGED GTP AND MANT DGPPNHP
1gnr: X-RAY CRYSTAL STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF THE CATALYTIC DOMAIN OF THE ONCOGENE PRODUCT P21H-RAS COMPLEXED WITH CAGED GTP AND MANT DGPPNHP
1he8: RAS G12V - PI 3-KINASE GAMMA COMPLEX
1iaq: C-H-RAS P21 PROTEIN MUTANT WITH THR 35 REPLACED BY SER (T35S) COMPLEXED WITH GUANOSINE-5'-[B,G-IMIDO] TRIPHOSPHATE
1ioz: Crystal Structure of the C-HA-RAS Protein Prepared by the Cell-Free Synthesis
1jah: H-RAS P21 PROTEIN MUTANT G12P, COMPLEXED WITH GUANOSINE-5'-[BETA,GAMMA-METHYLENE] TRIPHOSPHATE AND MAGNESIUM
1jai: H-RAS P21 PROTEIN MUTANT G12P, COMPLEXED WITH GUANOSINE-5'-[BETA,GAMMA-METHYLENE] TRIPHOSPHATE AND MANGANESE
1k8r: Crystal structure of Ras-Bry2RBD complex
1lf0: Crystal Structure of RasA59G in the GTP-bound form
1lf5: Crystal Structure of RasA59G in the GDP-bound Form
1lfd: CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF THE ACTIVE RAS PROTEIN COMPLEXED WITH THE RAS-INTERACTING DOMAIN OF RALGDS
1nvu: Structural evidence for feedback activation by RasGTP of the Ras-specific nucleotide exchange factor SOS
1nvv: Structural evidence for feedback activation by RasGTP of the Ras-specific nucleotide exchange factor SOS
1nvw: Structural evidence for feedback activation by RasGTP of the Ras-specific nucleotide exchange factor SOS
1nvx: Structural evidence for feedback activation by RasGTP of the Ras-specific nucleotide exchange factor SOS
1p2s: H-Ras 166 in 50% 2,2,2 triflouroethanol
1p2t: H-Ras 166 in Aqueous mother liquor, RT
1p2u: H-Ras in 50% isopropanol
1p2v: H-RAS 166 in 60 % 1,6 hexanediol
1plj: CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC STUDIES ON P21H-RAS USING SYNCHROTRON LAUE METHOD: IMPROVEMENT OF CRYSTAL QUALITY AND MONITORING OF THE GTPASE REACTION AT DIFFERENT TIME POINTS
1plk: CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC STUDIES ON P21H-RAS USING SYNCHROTRON LAUE METHOD: IMPROVEMENT OF CRYSTAL QUALITY AND MONITORING OF THE GTPASE REACTION AT DIFFERENT TIME POINTS
1pll: CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC STUDIES ON P21H-RAS USING SYNCHROTRON LAUE METHOD: IMPROVEMENT OF CRYSTAL QUALITY AND MONITORING OF THE GTPASE REACTION AT DIFFERENT TIME POINTS
1q21: CRYSTAL STRUCTURES AT 2.2 ANGSTROMS RESOLUTION OF THE CATALYTIC DOMAINS OF NORMAL RAS PROTEIN AND AN ONCOGENIC MUTANT COMPLEXED WITH GSP
1qra: STRUCTURE OF P21RAS IN COMPLEX WITH GTP AT 100 K
1rvd: H-RAS COMPLEXED WITH DIAMINOBENZOPHENONE-BETA,GAMMA-IMIDO-GTP
1wq1: RAS-RASGAP COMPLEX
1xcm: Crystal structure of the GppNHp-bound H-Ras G60A mutant
1xd2: Crystal Structure of a ternary Ras:SOS:Ras*GDP complex
1xj0: Crystal Structure of the GDP-bound form of the RasG60A mutant
1zvq: Structure of the Q61G mutant of Ras in the GDP-bound form
1zw6: Crystal Structure of the GTP-bound form of RasQ61G
221p: THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES OF H-RAS P21 MUTANTS: MOLECULAR BASIS FOR THEIR INABILITY TO FUNCTION AS SIGNAL SWITCH MOLECULES
2c5l: STRUCTURE OF PLC EPSILON RAS ASSOCIATION DOMAIN WITH HRAS
2ce2: CRYSTAL STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF A FLUORESCENT FORM OF H-RAS P21 IN COMPLEX WITH GDP
2cl0: CRYSTAL STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF A FLUORESCENT FORM OF H-RAS P21 IN COMPLEX WITH GPPNHP
2cl6: CRYSTAL STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF A FLUORESCENT FORM OF H-RAS P21 IN COMPLEX WITH S-CAGED GTP
2cl7: CRYSTAL STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF A FLUORESCENT FORM OF H-RAS P21 IN COMPLEX WITH GTP
2clc: CRYSTAL STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF A FLUORESCENT FORM OF H-RAS P21 IN COMPLEX WITH GTP (2)
2cld: CRYSTAL STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF A FLUORESCENT FORM OF H-RAS P21 IN COMPLEX WITH GDP (2)
2evw: Crystal structure analysis of a fluorescent form of H-Ras p21 in complex with R-caged GTP
2q21: CRYSTAL STRUCTURES AT 2.2 ANGSTROMS RESOLUTION OF THE CATALYTIC DOMAINS OF NORMAL RAS PROTEIN AND AN ONCOGENIC MUTANT COMPLEXED WITH GSP
421p: THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES OF H-RAS P21 MUTANTS: MOLECULAR BASIS FOR THEIR INABILITY TO FUNCTION AS SIGNAL SWITCH MOLECULES
521p: THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES OF H-RAS P21 MUTANTS: MOLECULAR BASIS FOR THEIR INABILITY TO FUNCTION AS SIGNAL SWITCH MOLECULES
5p21: REFINED CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF THE TRIPHOSPHATE CONFORMATION OF H-RAS P21 AT 1.35 ANGSTROMS RESOLUTION: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE MECHANISM OF GTP HYDROLYSIS
621p: THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES OF H-RAS P21 MUTANTS: MOLECULAR BASIS FOR THEIR INABILITY TO FUNCTION AS SIGNAL SWITCH MOLECULES
6q21: MOLECULAR SWITCH FOR SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION: STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ACTIVE AND INACTIVE FORMS OF PROTOONCOGENIC RAS PROTEINS
721p: THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES OF H-RAS P21 MUTANTS: MOLECULAR BASIS FOR THEIR INABILITY TO FUNCTION AS SIGNAL SWITCH MOLECULES
821p: THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES AND PROPERTIES OF A TRANSFORMING AND A NONTRANSFORMING GLYCINE-12 MUTANT OF P21H-RAS