Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Kāśyapīya

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Part ofa serieson
EarlyBuddhism
Buddhism

TheKāśyapīya (Sanskrit: काश्यपीय;Pali:Kassapiyā orKassapikā;traditional Chinese:飲光部; ; pinyin:Yǐnguāng Bù; Vietnamese:Ẩm Quang đệ tử bộ, Ca-diếp-di bộ) was one of theearly Buddhist schools inIndia.

Etymology

[edit]

The nameKāśyapīya is believed to be derived from Kāśyapa, one of the original missionaries sent by KingAshoka to theHimavant country. The Kāśyapīyas were also called theHaimavatas.[1]

History

[edit]

The Kāśyapīyas are believed to have become an independent school c. 190 BCE.[2] According to theTheravādinMahāvaṃsa, the Kāśyapīya were an offshoot of theSarvāstivāda.[3] However, according to the Mahāsāṃghika account, the Kāśyapīya sect descended from theVibhajyavādins.[4]

Xuanzang andYijing note small fragments of the Kāśyapīya sect still in existence around the 7th century, suggesting that much of the sect may have adopted theMahāyāna teachings by this time.[5]

In the 7th century CE, Yijing grouped theMahīśāsaka,Dharmaguptaka, and Kāśyapīya together as sub-sects of the Sarvāstivāda, and stated that these three groups were not prevalent in the "five parts of India," but were located in the some parts ofOḍḍiyāna,Khotan, andKucha.[6]

Appearance

[edit]

Between 148 and 170 CE, theParthian monkAn Shigao came to China and translated a work which describes the color of monastic robes (Skt.kāṣāya) utilised in five major Indian Buddhist sects, calledDa Biqiu Sanqian Weiyi (Ch. 大比丘三千威儀).[7] Another text translated at a later date, theŚāriputraparipṛcchā, contains a very similar passage corroborating this information.[7] In both sources, members of the Kāśyapīya sect are described as wearing magnolia robes.[8][9] The relevant portion of theMahāsāṃghikaŚāriputraparipṛcchā reads: "The Kāśyapīya school are diligent and energetic in guarding sentient beings. They wear magnolia robes."[9]

Doctrines

[edit]

InVasumitra's historySamayabhedoparacanaćakra, the Haimavatas (Kāśyapīyas) are described as an eclectic school upholding doctrines of both theSthaviras and the Mahāsāṃghikas.[10]

According to theKathāvatthucommentary, the Kāśyapīyas believed that past events exist in the present in some form.[11]

According toA. K. Warder, the Kāśyapīya school held the doctrine thatarhats were fallible and imperfect, similar to the view of theSarvāstivādins and the various Mahāsāṃghika sects.[1] They held that arhats have not fully eliminated desires, that their "perfection" is incomplete, and that it is possible for them to relapse.[1]

Texts

[edit]

Some tentatively attribute theGāndhārīDharmapada to the Kāśyapīya school.[12]

An incomplete translation of the SaṃyuktaĀgama (T. 100) that is in theChinese Buddhist canon is believed to be that of the Kāśyapīya sect.[13] This text is different from the complete version of the Saṃyukta Āgama (T. 99), which came from the Sarvāstivāda sect.

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcWarder, A. K.Indian Buddhism. 2000. p. 277.
  2. ^Warder (1970/2004), p. 277.
  3. ^See, e.g.,Mahāvaṃsa (trans., Geiger, 1912), ch. 5, "The Third Council," Retrieved 27 November 2008 from "Lakdiva" athttp://lakdiva.org/mahavamsa/chap005.html.
  4. ^Baruah, Bibhuti.Buddhist Sects and Sectarianism. 2008. p. 51.
  5. ^Baruah, Bibhuti.Buddhist Sects and Sectarianism. 2008. p. 52.
  6. ^Yijing. Li Rongxi (translator).Buddhist Monastic Traditions of Southern Asia. 2000. p. 19.
  7. ^abHino, Shoun.Three Mountains and Seven Rivers. 2004. p. 55.
  8. ^Hino, Shoun.Three Mountains and Seven Rivers. 2004. pp. 55–56.
  9. ^abSujato, Bhante (2012),Sects and Sectarianism: The Origins of Buddhist Schools, Santipada, p. i,ISBN 9781921842085.
  10. ^Baruah, Bibhuti.Buddhist Sects and Sectarianism. 2008. p. 54.
  11. ^Malalasekera, G. P.Dictionary of Pali Proper Names. Asian Educational Services.ISBN 978-81-206-1823-7.
  12. ^See, e.g., Brough (2001), pp. 44–45:
    We can with reasonable confidence say that the Gāndhārī text did not belong to the schools responsible for the Pali Dhammapada, the Udānavarga, and the Mahāvastu; and unless we are prepared to dispute the attribution of any of these, this excludes the Sarvāstivādins and the Lokottaravāda-Mahāsānghikas, as well as the Theravādins (and probably, in company with the last, the Mahīśāsakas). Among possible claimants, the Dharmaguptakas and Kāśyapīyas must be considered as eligible, but still other possibilities cannot be ruled out.
  13. ^Warder, A. K.Indian Buddhism. 2000. p. 6.

Sources

[edit]
  • Brough, John (2001).The Gāndhārī Dharmapada. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited.
  • Geiger, Wilhelm (trans.), assisted by Mabel H. Bode (1912).The Great Chronicle of Ceylon.Pali Text Society.ISBN 0-86013-001-0. Retrieved 27 Nov 2008 from "Lakdiva" athttp://lakdiva.org/mahavamsa/.
  • Malalasekera, G. P. (2003).Dictionary of Pali Proper Names. Asian Educational Services.ISBN 81-206-1823-8.
  • Warder, A. K. (1970/2004).Indian Buddhism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.ISBN 81-208-1741-9.
   Topics inBuddhism   
Foundations
The Buddha
Bodhisattvas
Disciples
Key concepts
Cosmology
Branches
Practices
Nirvana
Monasticism
Major figures
Texts
Countries
History
Philosophy
Culture
Miscellaneous
Comparison
Lists
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kāśyapīya&oldid=1317031862"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp