Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Canceled NASA orbiter mission to Jupiter's icy moons
This article is about the NASA mission proposal cancelled in 2005. For the ESA-led mission currently en route to Jupiter, seeJupiter Icy Moons Explorer.

Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter
Artist's conception of theJIMO spacecraft exploring Jupiter and its moons
NamesJIMO
Mission typeJupiter orbiter
OperatorNASA
Mission durationCancelled
Spacecraft properties
ManufacturerNorthrop Grumman
Launch massTotal (fully assembled):
36,375 kg (80,193 lb)
Dry massSpacecraft module:
16,193 kg (35,699 lb)
Reactor module:
6,182 kg (13,629 lb)
Payload mass1,500 kg (3,300 lb)
DimensionsFully deployed:
58.4 × 15.7 m (192 × 52 ft)
Power200 kilowatts
Start of mission
Launch dateNET May 2015 – January 2016
Planned
RocketDelta IV Heavy
Baseline (2005)
Launch siteCape CanaveralSLC-37B
Jupiter orbiter
Orbital insertionApril 2021
Planned
Orbital departureSeptember 2025
Planned
Europa orbiter
Orbital insertionSeptember 2025
Planned
Transponders
Bandwidth10-Mbit/s
TWTA power4 x 250 watts
Large Strategic Science Missions
Planetary Science Division

TheJupiter Icy Moons Orbiter (JIMO) was a proposedNASAspacecraft designed to explore the icymoons of Jupiter. The main target wasEuropa, where an ocean of liquid water may harbor alien life.Ganymede andCallisto, which are now thought to also have liquid, salty oceans beneath their icy surfaces, were also targets of interest for the probe.

The JIMO spacecraft

[edit]
Forward view of JIMO

Throughout JIMO's main voyage to the Jupiter moons, it was to be propelled by anion propulsion system via either theHigh Power Electric Propulsion or NEXIS engine, and powered by a smallfission reactor.ABrayton power conversion system would convert reactor heat into electricity. Providing a thousand times the electrical output of conventionalsolar- orradioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG)-based power systems, the reactor was expected to open up opportunities like flying a full scale ice-penetratingradar system and providing a strong, high-bandwidthdata transmitter.

Using electric propulsion (8 ion engines, plusHall thrusters of varying sizes) would make it possible to go into and leave orbits around themoons of Jupiter, creating more thorough observation and mapping windows than exist for current spacecraft, which must make short fly-by maneuvers because of limited fuel for maneuvering.

The design called for the reactor to be positioned in the tip of the spacecraft behind a strongradiation shield protecting sensitive spacecraft equipment. The reactor would only be powered up once the probe was well out of Earth orbit, so that the amount ofradionuclides that would be launched into orbit is minimized. This configuration is thought to be less risky than theRTGs used on previous missions to the outerSolar System.[why?]

TheEuropa Lander Mission proposed to include a small nuclear-powered Europa lander on JIMO. It would travel with the orbiter, which would also function as a communication relay to Earth.[1] It would investigate Europa'shabitability and assess itsastrobiological potential by confirming the existence of water within and below Europa's icy shell, and determining its characteristics.[2]

Northrop Grumman was selected on September 20, 2004 for a US$400 million preliminary design contract, beatingLockheed Martin andBoeing IDS. The contract was to have run through to 2008. Separate contracts, covering construction and individual instruments, were to be awarded at a later date.

Preliminary design specifications

[edit]
NEXIS ion engine test (2005)
HiPEP ion engine test (2003)
  • Gross mass in low Earth orbit: 36,375 kg
  • Mass of xenon propellant: 12,000 kg
  • Reactor module mass: 6,182 kg (200 kWe output)
  • Spacecraft module dry mass: 16,193 kg
  • Science payload mass: 1,500 kg
  • Electric turboalternators: multiple 104 kW (440 V AC)
  • Deployable radiator: 422 m2 surface area
  • Electric Herakles ion thrusters: multiple 30 kW high efficiency, specific impulse 7,000 s (69 kN·s/kg)
  • Hall thrusters: high power, higher thrust
  • Telecommunications link: 10 Mbit/s (4×250 watt TWTA)
  • Deployed size: 58.4 m long × 15.7 m wide
  • Stowed size: 19.7 m long × 4.57 m wide
  • Mission design life: 20 years
  • Launch date: 2017
  • Launch Vehicle:Delta IV Heavy
  • Cost: 16 billion $ excluding launch[3]

Nuclear propulsion

[edit]

The JIMO mission was proposed to include anuclear electric propulsion system, with power provided by a small 200 kWefission power system. The nuclear propulsion program was conducted from 2003 to 2005 by the Naval Reactors branch of theDOE.[4]

The proposed system design was agas-cooled reactor andBrayton power conversion to generate a peak output of 200 kilowatts of power.[4]

Mission profile

[edit]
Europa Lander Mission concept circa 2005 (NASA)

Three launches were planned for May 2015 tolow Earth orbit in order to assemble the two transfer stages and the probe. Transfer stages were designed to launch the probe on its trajectory to Jupiter during the launch window extending from late October 2015 to mid-January 2016.

During the first month of flight, the probe's main structures would be deployed, the nuclear reactor activated, and the thrusters tested. The interplanetary flight would have lasted until April 2021 (the ion engines were supposed to work two-thirds of the time).

Once the probe was in the influence area of Jupiter, the navigation would become more complex and difficult. The probe would have to usegravity assist manoeuvres to enter orbit.

The probe would have studiedCallisto and thenGanymede for three months each, and finallyEuropa for one month (studies ofIo were also planned when orbital conditions would have been favorable).

At the end of the mission in September 2025, the vehicle would have been parked in a stable orbit around Europa.

Cancellation

[edit]

Due to a shift in priorities atNASA that favored crewed space missions, the project lost funding in 2005, effectively cancelling the JIMO mission. Among other issues, the proposed nuclear technology was deemed too ambitious, as was the multiple-launch and in-orbit assembly mission architecture.[5]Engineers at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory with JIMO were laid off or reassigned during the spring and summer of 2005.[citation needed]

As a result of the budget changes, NASA is[when?] instead considering a demonstration mission to a target closer toEarth to test out the reactor and heat rejection systems. The spacecraft would possibly be scaled down from its original size as well.[citation needed]

When it was cancelled, the JIMO mission was in an early planning stage and launch wasn't expected before 2017. It was to be the first proposed mission of NASA'sProject Prometheus, a program for developingnuclear fission into a means ofspacecraft propulsion.

Subsequent proposed replacements

[edit]

After JIMO, NASA and ESA planned a joint mission to Jupiter's moons, theEuropa Jupiter System Mission. This mission was also cancelled in 2011.

ESA has since continued to work separately on that design and on May 2, 2012 selected theJupiter Icy Moon Explorer (JUICE) mission over two other ESA missions for funding. The JUICE mission will study the Jupiter moons Europa, Callisto and Ganymede and was launched as an ESA L-class mission on April 14, 2023 on anAriane 5 carrier rocket.

In the late 2010s, theEuropa Clipper became the main NASA mission to Europa with a significant difference in that it would be solar-powered and engage in multiple flybys of the moon rather than orbit it. Another similar mission is theEuropa Lander, a proposed NASA astrobiology mission to Europa, to complement Europa Clipper. Europa Clipper was launched in 2024 and Europa Lander is planned to be launched in 2027.[6][7]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Abelson & Shirley – Small RPS-Enabled Europa Lander Mission (2005). (PDF) . Retrieved on July 23, 2013
  2. ^Europa Study Team (May 1, 2012),"EUROPA STUDY 2012 REPORT"(PDF),EUROPA LANDER MISSION(PDF), Jet Propulsion Laboratory – NASA, p. 287, archived fromthe original(PDF) on March 5, 2016, retrievedJuly 15, 2015
  3. ^"Project Prometheus final report - page 178"(PDF). 2005. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on May 6, 2010. RetrievedOctober 1, 2013.
  4. ^abMason, Lee; Bailey, Sterling; Bechtel, Ryan; Elliott, John; Fleurial, Jean-Pierre; Houts, Mike; Kapernick, Rick; Lipinski, Ron; MacPherson, Duncan; Moreno, Tom; Nesmith, Bill; Poston, Dave; Qualls, Lou; Radel, Ross; Weitzberg, Abraham; Werner, Jim (November 18, 2010)."Small Fission Power System Feasibility Study — Final Report".NASA/DOE. RetrievedOctober 11, 2022.
  5. ^Berger, Brian (February 7, 2005)."NASA 2006 Budget Presented: Hubble, Nuclear Initiative Suffer".Space.com. RetrievedJune 6, 2007.
  6. ^"NASA to receive $22.6 billion in fiscal year 2020 spending bill". December 16, 2019.
  7. ^Foust, Jeff (February 17, 2019)."Final fiscal year 2019 budget bill secures $21.5 billion for NASA".Space News.

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toJIMO.
Flybys
Orbiters
Atmospheric probes
En route
Planned missions
Proposed missions
Cancelled
or not developed
Related topics
Missions are ordered by launch date. Sign indicates failure en route or before intended mission data returned. indicates use of the planet as agravity assist en route to another destination.
Geology
Chaotic terrain
Craters
Lists
Exploration
Past
En route
Cancelled
Other
Geology
Lists
Paterae
Mountains
Lava flows or channels
Volcanism / Volcanoes
Fluctūs
Plains and plateaus
Exploration
Past
Current
Planned / On-route
Proposed
Cancelled / Concepts
Other
Geology
Lists
Craters
Catenae
Exploration
Past
Future
Cancelled
Other
Geology
Lists
Impact craters
Regions
Sulci
Faculae
Catenae
Exploration
Past
Planned
Cancelled
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jupiter_Icy_Moons_Orbiter&oldid=1275847559"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp