AJudensau (German for "Jews' sow")[1][2][3] is afolk art[4] image ofJews in obscene contact with a large sow (femalepig), which inJudaism is anunclean animal. These first appeared in the 13th century inGermany[1] and some other European countries, and remained popular for over 600 years.[5]
The Jewish prohibition against eating pork comes fromTorah, in theBook of Leviticus Chapter 11, verses 2 through 8.[6][7] The arrangement ofJews surrounding, suckling, and having intercourse with the animal (sometimes regarded as thedevil[4]), is a mockery of Judaism.
The image appears in theMiddle Ages, mostly in carvings onchurch orcathedral walls,[1] often outside where it could be seen from the street (for example atWittenberg andRegensburg), but also in other forms. The earliest appearance seems to be on the underside of a wooden choir-stall seat inCologne Cathedral, dating to about 1210. The earliest example in stone dates to ca. 1230 and is located in the cloister of the cathedral atBrandenburg. In about 1470 the image appeared inwoodcut form, and thereafter was often copied inpopular prints, often with antisemitic commentary. A wall painting on thebridge tower ofFrankfurt am Main, constructed between 1475 and 1507 near the gateway to the Jewishghetto and demolished in 1801, was an especially notorious example and included a scene of theritual murder ofSimon of Trent.[8]
The city ofWittenberg contains aJudensau from 1305, on the façade of theStadtkirche, the church whereMartin Luther preached. It portrays a rabbi who looks under the sow's tail, and other Jews drinking from its teats. An inscription reads "Rabini Schem HaMphoras", Latin (in German orthography) for "Shem HaMephorash of the Rabbi", mocking theTetragram to be a pig. The sculpture is one of the last remaining examples in Germany of medieval "Jew baiting". In 1988, on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of theKristallnacht, debate sprung up about the monument, which resulted in the addition of a sculpture recognizing that during theHolocaust six million Jews were murdered "under thesign of the cross".[9]
InVom Schem Hamphoras (1543), Luther comments on the Judensau sculpture at Wittenberg, echoing the antisemitism of the image and locating theTalmud in the sow's bowels:
Here on our church in Wittenberg a sow is sculpted in stone. Young pigs and Jews lie suckling under her. Behind the sow a rabbi is bent over the sow, lifting up her right leg, holding her tail high and looking intensely under her tail and into her Talmud, as though he were reading something acute or extraordinary, which is certainly where they get their Shemhamphoras.[2]
In July 2016, Dr. Richard Harvey, aMessianic (Christian) theologian from the United Kingdom, initiated a petition onChange.org to have the Wittenberg Judensau removed.[10]
In 2018, Michael Düllmann, a member of Berlin's Jewish community, sued to have the sculpture removed as defamatory. In February 2020, the district court ofDessau and the Higher Regional Court inNaumburg had rejected the claim, though petitioner vowed to appeal to higher courts. The Lutheran church and some historians, such asMichael Wolffsohn, have also debated whether the sculpture should be removed for being antisemitic or whether doing so would whitewash the church's historical antisemitism.[11] The legal debate continued for some time.[12]
In June 2022, a German federal court of appeal sided with the lower courts, ruling that while the sculpture itself is disparaging to Jews if viewed in isolation, "the legal system does not demand its removal", suggesting that other means (such as a memorial plaque explaining the history of the sculpture) are better suited to address the issue.[13]
Some of these sculptures can be found at some churches today.
Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, These [are] the beasts which ye shall eat among all the beasts that [are] on the earth. Whatsoever parteth the hoof, and is clovenfooted, [and] cheweth the cud, among the beasts, that shall ye eat. Nevertheless these shall ye not eat of them that chew the cud, or of them that divide the hoof: [as] the camel, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he [is] unclean unto you. And the coney, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he [is] unclean unto you. And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he [is] unclean unto you. And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be clovenfooted, yet he cheweth not the cud; he [is] unclean to you. Of their flesh shall ye not eat, and their carcase shall ye not touch; they [are] unclean to you.