Garter-encircled arms of John Russell, 1st Earl Russell, KG, GCMG, PC, FRS
John Russell, 1st Earl Russell (18 August 1792 – 28 May 1878), known asLord John Russell before 1861, was a BritishWhig andLiberal statesman who wasPrime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1846 to 1852 and again from 1865 to 1866.
The third son of the6th Duke of Bedford, Russell was educated atWestminster School and Edinburgh University before entering Parliament in 1813. In 1828 he took a leading role in the repeal of theTest Acts which discriminated against Catholics and Protestant dissenters. He was one of the principal architects of theReform Act 1832, which was the first major reform of Parliament since theRestoration, and a significant early step on the road to democracy and away from rule by the aristocracy andlanded gentry. He favoured expanding the right to vote to themiddle classes and enfranchising Britain's growing industrial towns and cities, but he never advocated universal suffrage and he opposed the secret ballot. Russell was outspoken on many issues over the course of his career, advocatingCatholic emancipation in the 1820s, calling for the repeal of theCorn Laws in 1845, denouncingPope Pius IX'srevival of Catholic bishoprics in 1850, and supportingItalian unification during the 1860s.
Russell's ministerial career spanned four decades. In addition to his two terms as prime minister, between 1831 and 1865 he served in the cabinets ofEarl Grey,Viscount Melbourne, theEarl of Aberdeen, andViscount Palmerston. Russell's relationship with Palmerston was often stormy and contributed to bringing down Russell's first government in 1852 and Palmerston's first government in 1858. However, their renewed alliance from 1859 was one of the foundations of the united Liberal Party, which would go on to dominate British politics in the following decades. While Russell was an energetic and effective minister during the 1830s and helped to commit the Whigs to a reform agenda, he proved less successful as prime minister. During his two periods as prime minister he often suffered from a disunited cabinet and weak support in the House of Commons, meaning he was unable to carry out much of his agenda. During his first premiership, his government failed to deal effectively with theIrish Famine, a disaster that saw the loss of a quarter of Ireland's population through death and emigration. During his second premiership, he split his party by pressing for further parliamentary reform and was forced from office only to watchDerby andDisraeli carry a more ambitiousReform Bill.
Russell was born on 18 August 1792 into the highest echelons of the British aristocracy, being the third son ofJohn Russell, later 6th Duke of Bedford, and Georgiana Byng, daughter ofGeorge Byng, 4th Viscount Torrington.The Russell family had been one of the principal Whig dynasties in England since the 17th century, and were among the richest handful of aristocratic landowning families in the country, but as a younger son of the6th Duke of Bedford, he was not expected to inherit the family estates. As a younger son of a duke, he bore thecourtesy title "Lord John Russell", but he was not a peer in his own right. He was, therefore, able to sit in the House of Commons until he was made an earl in 1861 and was elevated to the House of Lords.
Russell was born two months premature and was small and sickly as a child (even in adulthood he remained under 5 feet 5 inches (1.65 m) in height, and his small stature was frequently the butt of jokes by political opponents and caricaturists).[1] In 1801 at the age of nine he was sent away to school. Shortly thereafter his mother died. After being withdrawn fromWestminster School in 1804 due to ill health, Russell was educated by tutors, includingEdmund Cartwright.[2] In 1806 Russell's father was madeLord Lieutenant of Ireland in the short-livedMinistry of All the Talents and it was during this time that the young Russell metCharles James Fox.[3] Fox was Russell's formative political hero and would remain an inspiration throughout his life.[1] Russell attended theUniversity of Edinburgh from 1809 to 1812, lodging with ProfessorJohn Playfair, who oversaw his studies.[4] He did not take a degree. Although often in poor health, he travelled widely in Britain and inContinental Europe,[5] and held commission as Captain in theBedfordshire Militia in 1810.[6] During his continental travels, Russell visited Spain where hisbrother was serving as aide-de-camp toLord Wellington in thePeninsular War.[7] The following year, Russell had a 90-minute meeting withNapoleon in December 1814, during the former emperor's exile atElba.[8]
Russell entered theHouse of Commons as aWhig in 1813 at the age of 20. The future reformer gained his seat by virtue of his father, theDuke of Bedford, instructing the 30 or so electors of Tavistock to return him as an MP even though at the time Russell was abroad and under age.[9]
Russell entered Parliament more out of a sense of duty and family tradition than out of serious political ambition. With the exception the 1806-1807 coalition government in which Russell's father had served, the Whigs had been out of power since 1783, and Russell could have had no certain expectation of a ministerial career. In June 1815, Russell denounced theBourbon Restoration and Britain's declaration of war against therecently-returned Napoleon by arguing in the House of Commons that foreign powers had no right to dictate France's form of government.[10]
In 1817, tired of the prospect of perpetual opposition, Russell resigned from Parliament. After spending a year out of politics and travelling on the continent, he changed his mind and re-entered Parliament for Tavistock at the1818 general election.[11] In 1819, Russell embraced the cause of parliamentary reform and he led the more reformist wing of the Whigs throughout the 1820s. In 1828, while still an oppositionbackbencher, Russell introduced aSacramental Test bill with the aim of abolishing the prohibitions on Catholics and Protestant dissenters being elected to local government and from holding civil and military offices. The bill gained the backing of the ToryHome SecretarySir Robert Peel and was passed into law.[12][13]
When the Whigs came to power in 1830, Russell enteredEarl Grey's government asPaymaster of the Forces. Despite being a relatively junior minister, as a vocal advocate for Parliamentary reform for over a decade, Russell became a principal leader in the fight for theReform Act 1832. He was one of the committee of four tasked by Grey with drafting the reform bill, alongside cabinet ministersLord Durham,Lord Duncannon andSir James Graham. Despite not yet being in the Cabinet, Russell was chosen to introduce the bill in March 1831 and over the following year he successfully steered the Reform Act's difficult progress through the Commons.[14]
Russell earned the nickname "Finality Jack" from his pronouncing the Act a final measure but in later years he would go on to push for further reform of Parliament.[a] In May 1834, Russell made a speech on the Irish Tithes bill, in which he argued that the revenue generated by tithes was more than was justified by the size of theestablished Protestant church in Ireland. Russell argued that a proportion the tithe revenue should instead be appropriated for the education of the Irish poor, regardless of denomination.[15]
The speech was seen by its opponents as an attack on the established church in Ireland and it cemented a split within Grey's government over the issue of Irish tithes.[16] The following monthfour members of the Cabinet resigned over the issue, weakening the government's hold on Parliament.[17] Sensing that his position was now hopeless, Grey offered his resignation to the King in July, and was replaced byViscount Melbourne at the head of the government.
A pro-reform cartoon of 1831 depicting Russell as the man with the cure for the country's ills. Tory MPs forrotten and pocket boroughs are shown as patients requiring "The Russell Purge".
In November 1834, when the leader of the Commons,Lord Althorp, succeeded to the peerage asEarl Spencer, Russell became the leader of the Whigs in the Commons. Russell's appointment promptedKing William IV to terminate Melbourne's government, in part because the King objected to Russell's views on the Irish Church.[18] This remains the last time in British history that a monarch has dismissed a government.[19] The subsequent minority Conservative government lasted less than five months before resigning in April 1835.[20] Russell then returned to government office asHome Secretary inMelbourne's second government which was announced on 20 April 1835.[21] Soon after the formation of the new cabinet, the Melbourne called ageneral election, in which Russell suffered the loss of his home constituency inDevonshire as a result of strong Tory campaigning against Russell.[21] However, as the government had not yet formed in the Commons, a new seat was found for him in the seat ofStroud by persuadingCharles Richard Fox to step down.[21] On 19 May he was duly elected again just in time to take his place as Home Secretary and head of the government in the Commons.[21] Through this period, he continued to lead the more reformist wing of the Whig party.
As Home Secretary, Russell recommended and secured conditional royal pardons for theTolpuddle Martyrs and partial commutation of their sentences.[22][21] In October 1835 he published plans for prison reform and appointed the first official prison inspectors.[21] In 1837, he chose not to reform the convocation of the 'Hanging Cabinet' that decided, without agreed procedures, on theRoyal prerogative of mercy indeath sentences.[23] As Home Secretary, served as the last official receiver of pleas for mercy from those affected and some of these cases, such as those ofJames Pratt and John Smith would in the 21st century be legally reviewed, leading to posthumous pardons.[21] In 1836, he introduced theMarriages Act, which introduced civil marriages in England and Wales and allowed Catholics and Protestant Dissenters to marry in their own churches.[24]
In 1837, he steered a series of seven Acts through Parliament, which together reduced the number of offences carrying a sentence of death from thirty-seven to sixteen.[25][26] This number was reduced further by theSubstitution of Punishments of Death Act 1841. After these reforms the death penalty was rarely used in the United Kingdom for crimes other than murder. As Home Secretary Russell also introduced the public registration for births, marriages and deaths and played a large role in democratising the government of cities outside of London.[citation needed]
In 1841 the Whigs lost thegeneral election to the Conservatives and Russell and his colleagues returned to opposition. In November 1845, following the failure of that year's potato harvest across Britain and Ireland, Russell came out in favour of the repeal of theCorn Laws and called upon the Prime MinisterSir Robert Peel to take urgent action to alleviate the emerging food crisis.[28]
Peel had by this time already become convinced of the need for repeal, but he was opposed in this by the majority of his own cabinet and party. On 11 December 1845, frustrated by his party's unwillingness to support him on repeal, Peel resigned as prime minister andQueen Victoria invited Russell to form a new government. With the Whigs a minority in the Commons however, Russell struggled to assemble the necessary support. WhenLord Grey declared that he would not serve in cabinet ifLord Palmerston was made Foreign Secretary, it became clear to Russell that he could not form a viable government.[29]
Russell declined the Queen's invitation on 21 December and Peel agreed to stay on as prime minister. In June 1846, Peel repealed the Corn Laws with Whig support, bitterly dividing the Conservative Party in the process. Later that same night Peel'sIrish Coercion Bill was defeated after vengeful anti-repeal Tories voted with the opposition; and Peel, taking this as a vote of no confidence, resigned as prime minister. Russell accepted the Queen's offer to form a government; this time Grey did not object to Palmerston's appointment.[30]
Russell took office as prime minister with the Whigs only a minority in the House of Commons. It was the bitter split in the Conservative Party over the Corn Laws that allowed Russell's government to remain in power in spite of this, with Sir Robert Peel and his supporters offering tentative support to the new ministry in order to keep the protectionist Conservatives underLord Stanley in opposition. At thegeneral election of August 1847 the Whigs made gains at the expense of the Conservatives, but remained a minority, with Russell's government still dependent on the votes ofPeelite andIrish Repealer MPs to win divisions in the Commons.[citation needed]
Russell's political agenda was frequently frustrated by his lack of a reliable Commons majority. However, his government was able to secure a number of notable social reforms. Russell introduced teachers' pensions and usedOrders in Council to make grants for teacher training. ThePublic Baths and Wash-houses Acts of 1847 and 1848 enabled local authorities to build municipal baths and washing facilities for the growing urban working classes. Russell lent his support to the passage of theFactories Act 1847, which restricted the working hours of women and young persons (aged 13–18) in textile mills to 10 hours per day.[citation needed]
Following the election ofLionel de Rothschild in the 1847 general election, Russell introduced a Jewish Relief bill, which would have allowed Rothschild and other Jews to sit in the House of Commons without their having to take the explicitly Christian oath of allegiance. In 1848, the bill was passed by the House of Commons, receiving support from the Whigs and a minority of Conservatives (including future prime ministerBenjamin Disraeli). However, it was twice rejected by the Tory dominated House of Lords, as was a new bill in 1851. Rothschild was re-elected in the 1852 general election following the fall of the Russell government but was unable to take his seat until theJews Relief Act was finally passed in 1858.[citation needed]
Russell's government led the calamitous response to theIrish Famine. During the course of the famine, an estimated one million people died from a combination of malnutrition, disease and starvation and well over one million moreemigrated from Ireland.[33] After taking office in 1846, Russell's ministry introduced a programme of public works that by the end of that year employed some half-a-million but proved impossible to administer.[34] In 1846 Russell reported that in one year more than 50,000 Irish families had been "turned out of their wretched dwellings without pity and without refuge...we have made it the most degraded and most miserable country in the world...all the world is crying shame upon us."[35] In January 1847, the government abandoned this policy, realising that it had failed, and turned to a mixture of "indoor" and "outdoor" direct relief; the former administered inworkhouses through theIrish Poor Laws, the latter throughsoup kitchens. The costs of the Poor Law fell primarily on the local landlords, some of whom in turn attempted to reduce their liability by evicting their tenants.[34] In June 1847, thePoor Law Extension Act was passed, which embodied the principle, popular in Britain, that Irish property should support Irish poverty. Irish landlords were believed in Britain to have created the conditions that led to the famine, a view which Russell shared.[36]
In the first half of his premiership Russell aimed to improve the British government's relations with the papacy and the Catholic clergy in Ireland, which he saw as one of the keys to making Ireland a more willing part of the United Kingdom. Russell proposed to make an annual grant of £340,000 to the Catholic Church in Ireland, with the aim of ameliorating Irish Catholic opinion towardsthe Union. In 1847, Russell's father-in-law theEarl of Minto was dispatched on a confidential mission to Rome to seek thePope's support for the grants plan. In the end, the idea had to be abandoned due to Catholic objections to what they saw as an attempt to control their clergy.[37]
However, Russell pressed ahead with plans to re-establish formal diplomatic relations between theCourt of St James's and theHoly See, which had been severed whenJames II was deposed in 1688. Russell managed to pass an Act to authorise an exchange of ambassadors with Rome, but not before the bill was amended by Parliament to stipulate that the Pope's ambassador must be alayman. The Pope refused to accept such a restriction on his choice of representative and so the exchange of ambassadors did not take place.[1] It would not be until 1914 that formalUK-Vatican diplomatic relations were finally established.
Relations with the papacy soured badly in late 1850 afterPope Pius IX issued thebullUniversalis Ecclesiae. By this bull Pius unilaterally reintroduced Catholic bishops to England and Wales for the first time since theReformation. Anti-Catholic feelings ran high with many Protestants incensed at what they saw as impertinent foreign interference in the prerogative of the establishedChurch of England to appoint bishops. Russell, not withstanding his long record of advocating civil liberties for Catholics, shared the traditional Whig suspicion of the Catholic hierarchy, and was angered at what he saw as a papal imposition. On 4 November 1850, in a letter to theBishop of Durham published inThe Times the same day, Russell wrote that the Pope's actions suggested a "pretension to supremacy" and declared that "No foreign prince or potentate will be permitted to fasten his fetters upon a nation which has so long and so nobly vindicated its right to freedom of opinion, civil, political, and religious". Russell's "Durham letter" won him popular support in England but in Ireland it was viewed as an unwarranted insult to the Pope. It lost Russell the confidence of Irish Repealer MPs and the cabinet were angered that he had made such an incendiary statement without having consulting them.[38]
The following year Russell passed theEcclesiastical Titles Act 1851 with Tory support, which made it a criminal offence carrying a fine of £100 for anyone outside of the Church of England to assume an episcopal title "of any city, town or place, or of any territory or district...in the United Kingdom." The Act was widely ignored without consequences and only served to further alienate Irish MPs, thereby weakening the government's position in the Commons.[1]
Disagreements with Palmerston and fall of ministry
Russell frequently clashed with his headstrong Foreign Secretary,Lord Palmerston, whose belligerence and support for continental revolution he found embarrassing. In 1847 Palmerston provoked a confrontation with the French government by undermining the plans of the Spanish court to marry the youngSpanish Queen andher sister into the French royal family.[39]He subsequently clashed with Russell over plans to increase the size of the army and the navy to defend against the perceived threat of French invasion, which subsided after the overthrow of theFrench king in 1848.[40]
In 1850, further tension arose between the two over Palmerston'sgunboat diplomacy in theDon Pacifico affair, in which Palmerston sought compensation from theGreek government for the ransacking and the burning of the house ofDavid Pacifico, a Gibraltarian holder of a British passport.[41] Russell considered the matter "hardly worth the interposition of the British lion," and when Palmerston ignored some of his instructions, the Prime Minister wrote to Palmerston telling him he had informed the Queen that he "thought the interests of the country required that a change should take place at the Foreign Department."[42] However, less than a month laterLord Stanley successfully led the House of Lords into passing a motion of censure of the Government over its handling of the affair and Russell realised that he needed to align with Palmerston in order to prevent a similar motion being passed by the House of Commons, which would have obliged the Government to resign.[43] The Government prevailed, but Palmerston came out of the affair with his popularity at new heights since he was seen as the champion of defending British subjects anywhere in the world.[44]
Russell forced Palmerston to resign as Foreign Secretary after Palmerston recognisedNapoleon III's coup of 2 December 1851 without first consulting the Queen or Cabinet.[45] Russell tried to strengthen his government by recruiting leading Peelites such asSir James Graham andthe Duke of Newcastle to his administration, but they declined.[46] Out of office, Palmerston sought revenge by turning a vote on a militia bill into avote of confidence in the Government. A majority vote in favour of an amendment proposed by Palmerston caused the downfall of Russell's ministry on 21 February 1852. This was Palmerston's famous "tit for tat with Johnny Russell."[1]
Following Russell's resignation, on the 23 February 1852 theEarl of Derby accepted the Queen's invitation to form a government. The new Conservative ministry were a minority in the Commons due to the continuing rift with thePeelites. Derby called ageneral election for July but failed to secure a majority. After the election Derby's Conservatives held 292 out of the 662 seats in the Commons but were able to carry on in office due to divisions among the opposition. Negotiations over a Whig-Peelite coalition stalled over the question of who would lead it. Russell's authority and popularity within the Whigs had been dented by his falling out with Palmerston, who flatly refused to serve under him again. Moreover he had alienated many in the Peelites and the Irish Brigade, who held the balance of power in the Commons, leaving them unwilling to support another Russell-led government. Palmerston proposedLord Lansdowne as a compromise candidate. This was acceptable to Russell but Lansdowne was reluctant to take on the burdens of leading a government. The defeat ofDisraeli'sBudget in December 1852 forced the issue. Derby's government resigned and the Queen sent for Lansdowne and the PeeliteLord Aberdeen. Lansdowne declined the Queen's invitation, pleading ill-health and so Aberdeen was tasked with forming a government.[1][47]
Russell, as the leader of the Whigs, agreed to bring his party into a coalition with the Peelites, headed by Aberdeen. As the leader of the largest party in the coalition, Russell was reluctant to serve under Aberdeen in a subordinate position, but agreed to take on the role of Foreign Secretary on a temporary basis, to lend stability to the fledgling government. He resigned the role in February 1853 in favour ofClarendon, but continued to lead for the government in the Commons and attended cabinet without ministerial responsibilities. Russell was unhappy that half of Aberdeen's cabinet was made up of Peelites, despite the fact that the Whigs contributed hundreds of MPs to the Government's support in the Commons, and the Peelites only around 40. However, he came to admire some of his Peelite colleagues, particularly the Chancellor of the ExchequerWilliam Gladstone, who would go on to become an important political ally in later years.[48]
With Aberdeen's agreement, Russell used his position asLeader of the House of Commons to push for a new Reform Act. Although Russell had promoted theReform Act 1832 as a one-off measure to re-balance the constitution, after twenty years he had become convinced of the need for further electoral reform. In February 1854 Russell introduced his bill to the House. The property qualification was to be reduced from £10 to £6 in boroughs, and from £50 to £10 in the counties. Additionally 66 seats would be removed from undersized constituencies and redistributed.[49] The second reading of the bill was set for March 1854, but the prospect of imminent war with Russia led to it being postponed until April. After the outbreak of war on 28 March Russell came under pressure from the cabinet to withdraw the bill entirely. Russell threatened to resign if the cabinet abandoned the reform bill, but he was convinced to stay on by Aberdeen, who promised that he would support the reform bill if Russell reintroduced it in a future session.[50][51] However, with the fall of the Aberdeen government the following year, it would be 12 years before Russell had another chance to introduce a reform bill.
Together with Palmerston, Russell supported the government taking a hard line against Russian territorial ambitions in theOttoman Empire, a policy that ultimately resulted in Britain's entry into theCrimean War in March 1854, an outcome that the more cautious Aberdeen had hoped to avoid. In the following months Russell grew frustrated by what he saw as a lack of effective war leadership by Aberdeen and theSecretary of State for War, theDuke of Newcastle. Dispatches from the front reported that the army was suffering from supply shortages and a lack of adequate accommodation and medical facilities. In November 1854 Russell urged Aberdeen to replace Newcastle with Palmerston, who he believed would get a firmer grip on the organisation of the war, but these suggestions came to nothing. In January 1855, after a series of military setbacks, a Commons motion was brought by the radical MPJohn Roebuck to appoint a select committee to investigate the management of the war. Russell, not wishing to vote against an inquiry he believed was badly needed, resigned from the cabinet in order to abstain. Aberdeen viewed the Roebuck motion as a vote of no confidence in his leadership and, accordingly, when it passed by 305-148, he resigned.[52][1]
In the eyes of many, including the Queen and Aberdeen, Russell's temperamental behaviour and personal ambition had undermined the stability of the coalition.[53] On visitingWindsor Castle to resign, Aberdeen told the Queen "Had it not been for the incessant attempts of Lord John Russell to keep up party differences, it must be acknowledged that the experiment of a coalition had succeeded admirably," an assessment with which the Queen agreed.[54] Russell accepted an invitation from the Queen to form a new government but found that he could not assemble the necessary support, with many of his colleagues having been angered by his abandonment of Aberdeen over the Roebuck motion.[55] Palmerston became prime minister, and Russell reluctantly accepted the role of Colonial Secretary in his cabinet. Russell was sent to Vienna to negotiate peace terms with Russia, but his proposals were rejected and he resigned from the cabinet and returned to the backbenches in July 1855.[56][57]
Following his resignation Russell wrote to his father-in-law that he would not serve again under Palmerston or any other prime minister.[58] For a time it appeared as if his career in frontbench politics might be over. Russell continued to speak out from the backbenches on the issues he most cared about - lobbying for increased government grants for education and for reduction in the property qualification for Parliamentary elections.[59] In early 1857 Russell became a vocal critic of Palmerston's government over theAnglo-Persian War and theSecond Opium War. Russell spoke in support of a motion tabled byRichard Cobden, which criticised British military action in China and calling for a select committee inquiry. When the motion passed on 3 March, Palmerston dissolved Parliament and went to the country.[60] In the subsequentgeneral election Palmerston was swept back into power on a tide of patriotic feeling with an increased majority. Many of Palmerston's critics lost their seats but Russell hung on in the City of London, after fighting off an attempt to deselect him and replace him with a pro-Palmerston Whig candidate.[61] Palmerston's triumph was short-lived. In February 1858 the Government rushed through a Conspiracy to Murder bill, following theattempted assassination of Napoleon III by Italian nationalistFelice Orsini - an attack planned in Britain using British-made explosives. Russell attacked the bill, which he saw as undermined traditional British political liberties to appease a foreign government.[62] On 19 February Russell voted in favour ofThomas Milner Gibson's motion, which criticised the government for bowing to French demands. When the motion passed by 19 votes Palmerston's government resigned.[1]
In 1859, following another short-lived Conservative government, Palmerston and Russell made up their differences, and Russell consented to serve asForeign Secretary in a new Palmerston cabinet, usually considered the first trueLiberal cabinet. This period was a particularly eventful one in the world outside Britain, seeing theUnification of Italy (the change of British government to one sympathetic to Italian nationalism had a marked part in this process[63]), theAmerican Civil War, and the1864 war overSchleswig-Holstein betweenDenmark and theGerman states. Russell arranged theLondon Conference of 1864, but failed to establish peace in the war. His tenure of the Foreign Office was noteworthy for the famous dispatch in which he defended Italian unification: "Her Majesty's Government will turn their eyes rather to the gratifying prospect of a people building up the edifice of their liberties, and consolidating the work of their independence, amid the sympathies and good wishes of Europe" (27 October 1860).[64]
When Palmerston suddenly died in late 1865, Russell again becameprime minister. His second premiership was short and frustrating, and Russell failed in his great ambition of expanding the franchise, a task that would be left to his Conservative successors, Derby andBenjamin Disraeli. In 1866, party disunity again brought down his government. Russell never again held any office.[66]
Following the death of their daughter-in-law Viscountess Amberley in 1874 and their son Viscount Amberley in 1876, Earl Russell and Countess Russell brought up their orphaned grandchildren,John ("Frank") Russell, who became 2nd Earl Russell on his grandfather's death, andBertrand Russell who would go on to become a noted philosopher and who in later life recalled his elderly grandfather as "a kindly old man in a wheelchair."[67]
Earl Russell died at home at Pembroke Lodge on 28 May 1878. The Prime Minister, theEarl of Beaconsfield, offered a public funeral and burial at Westminster Abbey for Russell but this was declined by Countess Russell in accordance with her late husband's wish to be buried among his family and ancestors.[68] He is buried at the'Bedford Chapel' atSt. Michael's Church,Chenies, Buckinghamshire.
Lady Georgiana Adelaide Russell (1836 – 25 September 1922). She married Archibald Peel (son of GeneralJonathan Peel) on 15 August 1867. They had seven children.
Lady Victoria Russell (20 October 1838 – 9 May 1880). She married Henry Villiers (the son of The HonorableHenry Montagu Villiers) on 16 April 1861. They had ten children and left many descendants.[70]
Adelaide came down with a fever following the birth of their second child and died a few days later on 1 November 1838. Following her death, Russell continued to raise his late wife's four children from her first marriage, as well their two daughters.
Russell's second wife Frances with their eldest son John
John Russell, Viscount Amberley (10 December 1842 – 9 January 1876). He marriedThe Hon. Katherine Stanley on 8 November 1864. They had four children, including a stillborn daughter. Their eldest son,Frank, would succeed Lord John to the title to become the 2nd Earl Russell. Another son, the 3rd Earl, was the philosopherBertrand Russell.
Hon. George Gilbert William Russell (14 April 1848 – 27 January 1933).
Hon.Francis Albert Rollo Russell (11 July 1849 – 30 March 1914). He married Alice Godfrey (d. 12 May 1886) on 21 April 1885. They had one son. He remarried Gertrude Joachim on 28 April 1891. They had two children.
Russell was religious in a simple non-dogmatic way and supported "broad church" stances in the Church of England. He opposed the "Oxford Movement" because its "Tractarian" members were too dogmatic and too close toRoman Catholicism. He supported Broad Churchmen or Latitudinarians by several appointments of liberal churchmen as bishops. In 1859 he reversed himself and decided to free non-Anglicans of the duty of paying rates (taxes) to the local Anglican parish. His political clumsiness and opposition to Church finance made him a target of attack and ridicule in many Church circles.[73][74][75]
"The greatest liberal statesman of modern times" - Russell's small stature was frequently lampooned by political caricaturists.
Scion of one of the most powerful aristocratic families, Russell was a leading reformer who weakened the power of the aristocracy. His great achievements, wroteA. J. P. Taylor, were based on his persistent battles in Parliament over the years on behalf of the expansion of liberty; after each loss he tried again and again, until finally, his efforts were largely successful.[76]E. L. Woodward, however, argued that he was too much the abstract theorist:
He was more concerned with the removal of obstacles to civil liberty than with the creation of a more reasonable and civilized society. His political theory centred in therevolution of 1688, and in the clique of aristocratic families to whom the country owed loyalty in return for something like thecharte octroyée of the reform bill.
Nevertheless, Russell led his Whig party into support for reform; he was the principal architect of theReform Act 1832 (2 & 3 Will. 4. c. 45).
He was succeeded as Liberal leader by former PeeliteWilliam Gladstone, and was thus the last true Whig to serve as prime minister. Generally taken as the model forAnthony Trollope's Mr. Mildmay, aspects of his character may also have suggested those ofPlantagenet Palliser. An ideal statesman, said Trollope, should have "unblemished, unextinguishable, inexhaustible love of country.... But he should also be scrupulous, and, as being scrupulous, weak."[77]
TheReform Act 1832 and extension of the franchise to British cities are partly attributed to his efforts. He also worked for emancipation, leading the attack on theTest andCorporation acts, which were repealed in 1828, as well as towards legislation limiting working hours in factories in theFactories Act 1847, and thePublic Health Act 1848 (11 & 12 Vict. c. 63).
His government's approach to dealing with the Great Irish Famine is now widely condemned as counterproductive, ill-informed and disastrous. Russell himself was sympathetic to the plight of the Irish poor, and many of his relief proposals were blocked by his cabinet or by the British Parliament.[78]
Queen Victoria's attitude toward Russell was coloured by his role in the Aberdeen administration. On his death in 1878 her journal records that he was "a man of much talent, who leaves a name behind him, kind, & good, with a great knowledge of the constitution, who behaved very well, on many trying occasions; but he was impulsive, very selfish (as shown on many occasions, especially during Ld Aberdeen's administration) vain, & often reckless & imprudent."
A public house in Bloomsbury, large parts of which are still owned by the Bedford Estate, is named after Russell, located on Marchmont Street.
Earl Russell Street is named after him inAylestone, a suburb ofLeicester.
Russell Road inMerton Park, a suburb ofLondon, is named after him, adjacent to Derby, Gladstone, Palmerston and Pelham Roads, all named after former Prime Ministers.
The town ofRussell in theNorthland Region of New Zealand, was named in honour of him as the then Secretary of State for the Colonies.
Russell published numerous books and essays over the course of his life, especially during periods out of office. He principally wrote on politics and history, but also turned his hand to a variety of other topics and genres. His published works include:
Essays and Sketches of Life and Character by a Gentleman who has left his lodgings (1820) - a series of social and cultural commentaries ostensibly found in a missing lodger's rooms, published anonymously.[80]
An Essay on the History of the English Government and Constitution, from the reign ofHenry VII. to the present time (1821)
The Nun of Arrouca: a Tale (1822) - a romantic novel set in Portugal during the Peninsular War.
Memoirs, Journal, and Correspondence ofThomas Moore - in eight volumes, published between 1853 and 1856. Russell was Moore's literary executor and published his papers in accordance with his late friend's wishes.
Memorials and correspondence of Charles James Fox - in four volumes, published between 1853 and 1857.
A Tale of Two Cities byCharles Dickens was dedicated to Lord John Russell, "In remembrance of many public services and private kindnesses."[81] In speech given in 1869, Dickens remarked of Russell that "there is no man in England whom I respect more in his public capacity, whom I love more in his private capacity."[82]
Argent, a lion rampant gules, on a chief sable, three escallops of the field, over the centre escallop a mullet.
Supporters
Dexter, a lion gules; sinister, an heraldic antelope gules, armed, unguled, tufted, ducally gorged and chained, the chain reflexed over the back or; each supporter charged on the shoulder with a mullet argent.
^Queen Victoria's Journals, Tuesday 30th January 1855, Windsor Castle, Princess Beatrice's copies, Volume:39 (1 January 1855 – 30 June 1855), pp. 47–48,Online from the Bodleian Library
Richard A. Gaunt, "Peel's Other Repeal: The Test and Corporation Acts, 1828,"Parliamentary History (2014) 33#1 pp 243–262
Halevy, Elie (1950). "The Triumph of Reform 1830–1841".History of the English People in the Nineteenth Century.3. detailed political narrative
Halevy, Elie (1951). "Victorian Years".History of the English People in the Nineteenth Century.4. detailed political narrative
Hawkins, Angus (2007).The forgotten Prime Minister – the 14th Earl of Derby. Vol. I (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.ISBN978-0-19-920440-3.
Kenney, Blair G. (1965). "Trollope's Ideal Statesmen: Plantagenet Palliser and Lord John Russell".Nineteenth-Century Fiction.20 (3):281–285.doi:10.2307/2932760.ISSN0029-0564.JSTOR2932760.
Krein, David F. (1976). "War And Reform: Russell, Palmerston and the Struggle for Power in the Aberdeen Cabinet, 1853–54".Maryland Historian.7#2.
Lyons, Francis Stewart Leland (1973),Ireland since the famine, Fontana
Martin, B. K. (1923). "5. The Resignation of Lord Palmerston in 1853. Extracts from unpublished letters of Queen Victoria and Lord Aberdeen".Cambridge Historical Journal.1 (1):107–112.doi:10.1017/S147469130000086X.ISSN1474-6913.JSTOR3020826.
Nikol, John (1974). "The Oxford Movement in Decline: Lord John Russell and the Tractarians, 1846–1852".Historical Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church.43 (4):341–357.
Saunders, Robert (2005). "Lord John Russell and Parliamentary Reform, 1848–67".English Historical Review.120 (489):1289–1315.doi:10.1093/ehr/cei332.JSTOR3491041.
Scherer, Paul H. (1987). "Partner or Puppet? Lord John Russell at the Foreign Office, 1859–1862".Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies.19 (3):347–371.doi:10.2307/4050465.JSTOR4050465.
.jpg)
![[icon]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=https%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aWiki_letter_w_cropped.svg)
.jpg)
.svg)
.svg)
