Jacksonian Democrats
Thefirst inauguration of Andrew Jackson
Historical leaders	Andrew Jackson Martin Van Buren James K. Polk Thomas Hart Benton Stephen A. Douglas[1]
Founded	1825; 200 years ago (1825)[2]
Dissolved	1854; 171 years ago (1854)
Split from	Democratic-Republican Party
Preceded by	Jeffersonian Republicans Old Republicans
Merged into	Democratic Party
Ideology	Agrarianism Anti-corruption[3] Anti-elitism Civic engagement Classical liberalism[4] Jeffersonianism Direct democracy Majority rule[5] Manifest destiny Populism Spoils system Strict constructionism Universal white male suffrage[6] Utilitarianism[5] Factions: Radicalism[7] Conservatism[8] Anti-British sentiment
Political position	Big tent
National affiliation	Democratic Party (after1828)
Politics of the United States Political parties Elections

Jacksonian Era
1829–1854
Era of Good Feelings Greater Reconstruction
Andrew Jackson
Including	Antebellum South
President(s)	Andrew Jackson Martin Van Buren William Henry Harrison John Tyler James K. Polk
Key events	Trail of Tears Indian removal Nullification crisis Second Great Awakening Westward expansion Mexican–American War Prelude to the Civil War

This article is part of a series on the
History of the United States
Timeline and periods Prehistoric andPre-Columbian Era until 1607 Colonial Era 1607–1765 1776–1789     American Revolution 1765–1783     Confederation period 1783–1788 1789–1815     Federalist Era 1788–1801     Jeffersonian Era 1801–1817 1815–1849     Era of Good Feelings 1817–1825     Jacksonian Era 1825–1849 1849–1865     Civil War Era 1849–1865     Greater Reconstruction 1846–1898 1865–1917     Reconstruction Era 1865–1877     Gilded Age 1877–1896     Progressive Era 1896–1917 1917–1945     World War I 1917–1918     Roaring Twenties 1918–1929     Great Depression 1929–1941     World War II 1941–1945 1945–1964     Post-World War II Era 1945–1964     Civil Rights Era 1954–1968 1964–1980     Civil Rights Era 1954–1968     Vietnam War 1964–1975 1980–1991     Reagan Era 1981–1991 1991–2016     Post-Cold War Era 1991–present 2016–present 2016–present
Topics American Century Antisemitism Civil unrest Racial violence Cultural Cinema Music Newspapers Sports Demography Immigration Economy Banking Education Higher education Flag Government Abortion Capital punishment Civil rights Corruption The Constitution Debt ceiling Direct democracy Foreign policy Law enforcement Postal service Taxation Voting rights Journalism Maritime Military Army Marine Corps Navy Air Force Space Force Coast Guard Party Systems First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Religion Social class Slavery Sexual slavery Technology and industry Agriculture Labor Lumber Medicine Railway
Groups African Americans Asian Americans Chinese Americans Filipino Americans Indian Americans Japanese Americans Korean Americans Thai Americans Vietnamese Americans European Americans Albanian Americans English Americans Estonian Americans Finnish Americans German Americans Irish Americans Italian Americans Lithuanian Americans Polish Americans Serbian Americans Hispanic and Latino Americans Mexican Americans Jewish Americans Middle Eastern Americans Egyptian Americans Iranian Americans Iraqi Americans Lebanese Americans Palestinian Americans Saudi Americans Native Americans Cherokee Comanche Pacific Islander Americans Chamorros Hawaiians Women LGBTQ Gay men Lesbians Transgender people
Places Territorial evolution Admission to the Union Historic regions American frontier Manifest destiny Indian removal Regions New England The South The West Coast States AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY Territories DC AS GU MP PR VI Cities Urban history Cities
Outline List of years Historiography Category Portal
v t e

Jacksonian democracy, also known asJacksonianism, was a 19th-centurypolitical ideology in the United States that restructured a number of federal institutions. Originating with the seventhU.S. president,Andrew Jackson and his supporters, it became the nation's dominant political worldview for a generation. The term itself was in active use by the 1830s.^[9]

This era, called the Jacksonian Era orSecond Party System byhistorians andpolitical scientists, lasted roughly fromJackson's 1828 presidential election until thepractice of slavery became the dominant issue with the passage of theKansas–Nebraska Act in 1854 and the political repercussions of theAmerican Civil War dramatically reshaped American politics. It emerged when the long-dominantDemocratic-Republican Party became factionalized around the1824 presidential election. Jackson's supporters began to form the modernDemocratic Party. His political rivalsJohn Quincy Adams andHenry Clay created theNational Republican Party, which would afterward combine with other anti-Jackson political groups to form theWhig Party.

Broadly speaking, the era was characterized by ademocratic spirit. It built upon Jackson's equal political policy, subsequent to ending what he termed amonopoly of government byelites. Even before the Jacksonian era began, suffrage had been extended to a majority of white male adult citizens, a result which the Jacksonians celebrated.^[10] Jacksonian democracy also promoted the strength of the presidency and theexecutive branch at the expense ofCongress, while also seeking to broaden the public'sparticipation in government. The Jacksonians demanded elected, not appointed, judges and rewrote manystate constitutions to reflect the newvalues. In national terms, they favored geographicalexpansionism, justifying it in terms ofmanifest destiny.

Jackson's expansion of democracy was exclusively limited toWhite men, as well asvoting rights in the nation were extended to adult white males only, and "it is a myth that most obstacles to the suffrage were removed only after the emergence of Andrew Jackson and his party. Well before Jackson's election most states had lifted most restrictions on the suffrage for white male citizens or taxpayers."^[11] There was also little to no improvement, and in many cases a reduction of the rights ofnon-whiteU.S citizens, during the extensive period of Jacksonian democracy, spanning from 1829 to 1860.^[12]

In its earliest usage, the phrase "Jacksonian democracy" had a narrower meaning referring to theDemocratic Party, particularly as led byAndrew Jackson, who waspresident of the United States from 1829 to 1837.^[13] American historianJames Schouler called Jackson's political alliance "the Jackson Democracy" in his 1889History of the United States Under the Constitution, and in 1890 future presidentTheodore Roosevelt called the antebellum Democratic Party "the Jacksonian Democracy".^[14] Later historians, includingFrederick Jackson Turner andWilliam MacDonald, generalized the phrase "Jacksonian democracy" to describe democracy writ large in the United States and what they saw as the influence of theAmerican frontier on the character of American political culture.^[15] In the 1945 bookThe Age of Jackson,Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. influentially reinterpreted "Jacksonian Democracy" as a phenomenon of labor struggle against business power rather than of frontier regional influence.^[16]

In 1999, HistorianRobert V. Remini stated that Jacksonian Democracy involved the belief that the people are sovereign, that their will is absolute and that themajority rules.^[17]

William S. Belko, in 2015, summarized "the core concepts underlying Jacksonian Democracy" as:

equal protection of the laws; an aversion to a moneyed aristocracy, exclusive privileges, and monopolies, and a predilection for the common man;majority rule; and the welfare of the community over the individual.^[5]

Historian and social criticArthur M. Schlesinger Jr. argued in 1945 that Jacksonian democracy was built on the following:^[18]

• Expanded suffrage – The Jacksonians believed that voting rights should be extended to all white men. By the end of the 1820s, attitudes and state laws had shifted in favor ofuniversal white male suffrage^[19] and by 1856 all requirements to own property and nearly all requirements to pay taxes had been dropped.^[20][21]
• Manifest destiny – This was the belief that Americans had a destiny to settle theAmerican West and to expand control from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific, and that the West should be settled byyeoman farmers. However, theFree Soil movement, originally an offshoot of Jacksonianism, argued for limitations on slavery in the new areas to enable thepoor white man to flourish — they split with the main party briefly in 1848 when nominated former PresidentMartin Van Buren . TheWhigs generally opposed Manifest Destiny and expansion, saying the nation should build up its cities.^[22]
• Patronage – Also known as thespoils system, patronage was the policy of placing political supporters into appointed offices. Many Jacksonians held the view that rotating political appointees in and out of office was not only the right, but also the duty of winners in political contests. Patronage was theorized to be good because it would encourage political participation by the common man and because it would make a politician more accountable for poor government service by his appointees. Jacksonians also held that long tenure in the civil service was corrupting, so civil servants should be rotated out of office at regular intervals. However, patronage often led to the hiring of incompetent and sometimes corrupt officials due to the emphasis on party loyalty above any other qualifications.^[23]
• Strict constructionism – Like theJeffersonians who strongly believed in theKentucky and Virginia Resolutions, Jacksonians initially favored a federal government of limited powers. Jackson said that he would guard against "all encroachments upon the legitimate sphere of State sovereignty". However, he was not astates' rights extremist—indeed, thenullification crisis would find Jackson fighting against what he perceived as state encroachments on the proper sphere of federal influence. This position was one basis for the Jacksonians' opposition to theSecond Bank of the United States. As the Jacksonians consolidated power, they more often advocated expanding federal power, presidential power in particular.^[24]
• Laissez-faire – Complementing a strict construction of the Constitution, the Jacksonians generally favored a hands-off approach to the economy as opposed to the Whig program sponsoring modernization, railroads, banking, and economic growth.^[25][26] The chief spokesman amongstlaissez-faire advocates wasWilliam Leggett of theLocofocos in New York City.^[27][28] Jackson "placed most of the American economy off limits to government regulation. Only paper money bankers faced whatever (slim) interference his bias against governmental regulation allowed. No inequality of wages, prices, profits, inheritance—of the basic structure of American capitalism—had to fear Jackson's egalitarian scorn."^[29]
• Opposition to banking – In particular, the Jacksonians opposed government-granted monopolies to banks, especially the national bank, a central bank known as theSecond Bank of the United States. Jackson said: "The bank is trying to kill me, but I will kill it!" and he did so.^[30] The Whigs, who strongly supported the Bank, were led byHenry Clay,Daniel Webster, andNicholas Biddle, the bank chairman.^[31] Jackson himself was opposed to all banks because he believed they were devices to cheat common people—he and many followers believed that only gold and silver should be used to back currency, rather than the integrity of a bank.

An important movement in the period from 1800 to 1830—the era immediately before the election of Jackson—was the gradual expansion of the right to vote from only property owning men to include all white men over 21.^[34] Older states with property restrictions dropped them, namely all butRhode Island,Virginia, andNorth Carolina by the mid-1820s. No new states had property qualifications although three had adopted tax-paying qualifications—Ohio,Louisiana, andMississippi, of which only in Louisiana were these significant and long lasting.^[35] The process was peaceful and widely supported, except in the state of Rhode Island. In Rhode Island, theDorr Rebellion of the 1840s demonstrated that the demand for equal suffrage was broad and strong, although the subsequent reform included a significant property requirement for any resident born outside of the United States. However, free black men lost voting rights in several states during this period.^[36]

The fact that any man was now legally allowed to vote did not necessarily mean he routinely voted. He had to be pulled to the polls, which became the most important role of the local parties. They systematically sought out potential voters and brought them to the polls. Voter turnout soared during the 1830s, reaching about 80% of adult white male population in the1840 presidential election.^[37] Tax-paying qualifications remained in only five states by 1860—Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Delaware and North Carolina.^[38]

One innovative strategy for increasing voter participation and input was developed outside the Jacksonian camp. Prior to thepresidential election of 1832, theAnti-Masonic Party conducted the nation's firstpresidential nominating convention. Held in Baltimore, Maryland, September 26–28, 1831, it transformed the process by which political parties select their presidential and vice-presidential candidates.^[39]

The period from 1824 to 1832 was politically chaotic. TheFederalist Party and theFirst Party System were dead and with no effective opposition, the oldDemocratic-Republican Party withered away. Every state had numerous political factions, but they did not cross state lines. Political coalitions formed and dissolved and politicians moved in and out of alliances.^[40]

More former Democratic-Republicans supported Jackson, while others such asHenry Clay opposed him. More former Federalists, such asDaniel Webster, opposed Jackson, although some likeJames Buchanan supported him. In 1828,John Quincy Adams pulled together a network of factions called theNational Republicans, but he was defeated by Jackson. By the late 1830s, the Jacksonian Democrats and theWhigs—a fusion of the National Republicans and other anti-Jackson parties—politically battled it out nationally and in every state.^[41]

According to historianDaniel Walker Howe inWhat Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815–1848, Jacksonianism began with allegiance to Jackson the man.^[42] As one history put it, "While the Whigs denied it, their party really had its origin in Tennessee in opposition to Jackson."^[43] Jackson was an intensely partisan individual, in the most personal sense: his world was divided into friends to be enriched, and enemies to be extinguished. According toJohn Williams by way ofJohn Floyd, "he [Jackson] never determined on the ruin of any man that he did not succeed."^[44] WhenDavy Crockett famously said "Since you have chosen a man with a timber toe to succeed me, you may all go to hell, and I will go to Texas," it was because Jackson had successfully sought his electoral defeat and backed his peg-legged opponentAdam Huntsman, using electioneering techniques, alleged Crockett, that were dishonorable if not explicitly corrupt.^[45][46] Crockett was targeted—in his words "hunted down like a wild varmint"—in part because he declined to endorseJackson's inebriate nephew for a government job, and in part because he was the only Representative from Tennessee who voted against Indian Removal.^[47][48]

Because of Jackson's inherent tendency totribalism, it was almost inevitable that he became a central figure in the expansion of thepolitical party system in the United States. He was not only the nexus of the Democrats but played the central role of antagonist in the establishment of theAnti-Jacksonians, theAnti-Masons, and theWhigs. The Whigs were organized circa 1834, at which time "discontent with Jackson's policies and personal activities in relation to Tennessee politics had been steadily increasing, not only among certain outstanding men, but among the people of the state generally."^[49] In 1835, when Jackson revealed through a quickly-published private letter to "Indian fighter and war chaplain to chieftan Jackson"James Gwin that he wanted Martin Van Buren to succeed him as president, a Louisville newspaper explained that this signal fire had been lit in response to a Nashville newspaper editorial. The Nashville paper had made a well-intentioned inquiry: would Jackson not prefer to see his old Tennessee acquaintanceHugh Lawson White in the White House? "The poor Editor had unwittingly violated the first principles of Jackson-ism, to wit;unflinching adherence to the party candidate for office."^[50][51] And the party was, certainly while he lived, an extension of Jackson's inconsistent personal preferences and interests;Thomas P. Abernethy wrote in 1927, "No historian has ever accused Jackson, the greatDemocrat, of having had a political philosophy. It is hard to see that he even had any political principles. He was a man of action, and the man of action is likely to be an opportunist."^[52] Thus, Jacksonianism began without any given roster of principles other than Jackson's lifelong mission to extend "white supremacy across the North American continent."^[42] Jackson promoted political equality for white men, but his vision ofsocial egalitarianism beyond that core constituency was essentially nonexistent;^[53] anyone who suggested otherwise was despised as a conniving schemer who was disrupting the natural social order for personal advantage and, surely, financial gain.^[29]

The removal of Indians from their ancestral lands, so they could be more profitably replaced by Whites and their Black slaves in what became the Cotton Kingdom, "fixed the character of his political party" such that during theSecond Party System "voting on Indian affairs proved to be the most consistent predictor of partisan affiliation."^[42] According to political historian Joshua A. Lynn, "Democrats painted the political landscape as aBoschian triptych in which fiendishabolitionists,nativists, andtemperance crusaders flayed men of their autonomy, manhood, and whiteness."^[54] Per Lynn, the core principles of Jacksonism werewhite supremacy, theperpetuation of slavery, the ethnic cleansing of unceded Indigenous land claims within the territory of the United States, and mass politics, all guided by the worldview that "white men surrendered their sovereignty in proportion to its exercise by people of color."^[55] Thus, argue some historians, the color line wasthe core value of the Jacksonian Democratic Party, in that whether the voters were "urban workingmen, southern planters and yeomen, or frontier settlers" they were unified by a "racial essentialism" that established whiteness as the basis for a voting bloc that might otherwise share few common interests.^[55] There has been aschool of thought that conflated the Jacksonian Democratic Party with the progressive mode and the later 19th and 20th American labor movements, but historianEdward Pessen argued that Jackson's claim to the allegiances of working men should not be mistaken for an alliance between Jacksonian Age capital-D Democrats and the working class, stating that "Andrew Jackson was no special friend to labor and...working men whether organized or unorganized were in their turn no champions of the Democracy."^[56] Thus, Jackson's great innovation was to popularize a cultural norm wherein by "superintending inequality at home...patriarchs mingled in public as equals."^[57] As historianWilliam Freehling put it, Jackson's beliefs "took white men's egalitarian government to its (racial) limits and far beyond the (class) limits of theFounding Fathers' aristocratic republicanism...But his constricted definition...excluded almost all of American social inequality from governmental assault. His limited banking reforms left Northern manufacturers and Southern slaveholders untouched. His racial agenda sanctioned governmental consolidation of reds' and blacks' natural inferiority...This monument to American individualism had slaughtered the Bank, crushed the nullifiers, and impeded the secessionists. But that unacknowledged monster, his unimpeded racist capitalism, would haunt egalitarians for generations."^[29]

For his part, Jackson was acutely cognizant of the pro-slavery bent of his followers and saw that as a seat of power for the party. In 1840 he wrote to his nephew and political protégéAndrew Donelson about a campaign event inMadison County, Tennessee: "We had a large meeting to day.Polk andGrundy both spoke, to an attentive audience, and all things look well in this District. I have no fears of the result; the abolition question begins to draw the attention, I may say, the serious attention of the people here."^[58] When conceiving of a "start date" for the Jacksonian Era of American history, way back in 1874Samuel Eliot suggested that 1831 was a key year. By 1831 Jackson had consolidated power (he would run again and win a second term in 1832), but Eliot suggested that the year of theNat Turner slave rebellion and the launch ofTheLiberator abolitionist newspaper was the beginning of irreversible bifurcation of the body politic into pro-slavery hotheads and anti-racist radicals, and a consequent, perhaps-inevitable civil war. Certainly by the 1850s, the Democrats had become "the party of unswerving white supremacy," although the party leadership never came to any consensus on how to apply that racist philosophy to practical issues of governance.^[59]

As late as the 1950s an uneasy lack of clarity about the definition and goals of Jacksonianism led one political historian to admit that 100 years after the fact, they could only tell with certainty what it wasnot: "...it is not suggested that any plausible editorial selection could identify Jacksonian Democracy with the rise of abolitionism; or (in an exclusive sense) with the temperance movement, school reform, religious enthusiasm or theological liberalism; or (in any sense) with Utopian community building. Yet the variety of meanings which can command some documentary support is too wide for easy assimilation in a coherent interpretation of Jacksonian Democracy. Here there is, I think, a fair field for the critical examination of the major contending theses and, of greater importance, for a fresh reading of the most obvious Jacksonian sources."^[60]

Democracy is, I know full well, a word of power. I know that it has a charm for the hopeful, the generous, the lowly, and the aspiring, as well as for many darker spirits...I know that to be truly Democratic is of more importance than to win and wear the advantages connected with the name...of that which claims a monopoly of office and honors as the due reward of its devotion to equality, I am content to be adjudged lacking. Of that Democracy which robs the...Mexican of half his broad domains, and regards with a covetous eye the last of Spain's declining valuable possessions—which plants its heel on the neck of the abject and powerless negro, and hurls its axe after the flying form of the plundered, homeless, and desolate Indian.—may it be written on my grave that I never was a follower, and lived and died in nothing its debtor!

The spirit of Jacksonian democracy animated the party that formed around him, from the early 1830s to the 1850s, shaping the era, with theWhig Party the main opposition.^[62] The newDemocratic Party was rooted in the ideals of Jeffersonian democracy and was a coalition made up of poor farmers, city-dwelling laborers andIrish Catholics.^[63]

The new party was pulled together byMartin Van Buren in 1828 as Jackson crusaded on claims of corruption by PresidentJohn Quincy Adams. The new party (which did not get the name Democrats until 1834) swept to a landslide. As Mary Beth Norton explains regarding 1828:

Jacksonians believed the people's will had finally prevailed. Through a lavishly financed coalition of state parties, political leaders, and newspaper editors, a popular movement had elected the president. The Democrats became the nation's first well-organized national party.^[64]

The platforms, speeches and editorials were founded upon a broad consensus among Democrats. As Norton et al. explain:

The Democrats represented a wide range of views but shared a fundamental commitment to the Jeffersonian concept of an agrarian society. They viewed a central government as the enemy of individual liberty and they believed that government intervention in the economy benefited special-interest groups and created corporate monopolies that favored the rich. They sought to restore the independence of the individual—the artisan and the ordinary farmer—by ending federal support of banks and corporations and restricting the use of paper currency.^[65]

Jacksonvetoed more legislation than all previous presidents combined. The long-term effect was to create the modern, strong presidency.^[66] Jackson and his supporters also opposed progressive reformation as a movement. Progressive reformers eager to turn their programs into legislation called for a more active government. However, Democrats tended to oppose programs like educational reform and the establishment of a public education system. For instance, they believed that public schools restricted individual liberty by interfering with parental responsibility and undermined freedom of religion by replacing church schools.

According toFrancis Paul Prucha in 1969, Jackson looked at the Indian question in terms of military and legal policy, not as a problem due to their race.^[67] In 1813, Jackson adopted and treated as his own sonLyncoya Jackson, who had been orphaned by Jackson's orders toJohn Coffee at theBattle of Tallusahatchee during theCreek War—seeing in him a fellow orphan that was "so much like myself I feel an unusual sympathy for him".^[68] Lyncoya was one of threeindigenous members of Andrew Jackson's household. Lyncoya's biography was used as a defense against charges that Jackson's Indian policies were inhumane as early as 1815,^[69]: 141 continuing and accelerating through the 1824 and 1828 presidential elections. Lyncoya died of tuberculosis during the course of the 1828 campaign, allowing his obituary to serve as a platform for such messages.^[70]

In legal terms, when it became a matter of state sovereignty versus tribal sovereignty he went with the states and forced the Indians to fresh lands with no white rivals in what became known as theTrail of Tears.^{[citation needed]}

Among the leading followers wasStephen A. Douglas, senator from Illinois, who was the key player in the passage of theCompromise of 1850, and was a leading contender for the1852 Democratic presidential nomination. According to his biographer Robert W. Johanssen:

Douglas was preeminently a Jacksonian, and his adherence to the tenets of what became known as Jacksonian democracy grew as his own career developed. ... Popular rule, or what he would later call popular sovereignty, lay at the base of his political structure. Like most Jacksonians, Douglas believed that the people spoke through the majority, that the majority will was the expression of the popular will.^[1]

Jackson fulfilled his promise of broadening the influence of the citizenry in government, although not without vehement controversy over his methods.^[71]

Jacksonian policies included ending the bank of the United States, expanding westward andremovingAmerican Indians from the Southeast. Jackson was denounced as a tyrant by opponents on both ends of the political spectrum such asHenry Clay andJohn C. Calhoun. This led to the rise of theWhig Party.

Jackson created aspoils system to clear out elected officials in government of an opposing party and replace them with his supporters as a reward for their electioneering. With Congress controlled by his enemies, Jackson relied heavily on the power of the veto to block their moves.

One of the most important of these was theMaysville Road veto in 1830. A part of Clay'sAmerican System, the bill would have allowed for federal funding of a project to construct a road linking Lexington and the Ohio River, the entirety of which would be in the state of Kentucky, Clay's home state. His primary objection was based on the local nature of the project. He argued it was not the federal government's job to fund projects of such a local nature and/or those lacking a connection to the nation as a whole. The debates in Congress reflected two competing visions of federalism. The Jacksonians saw the union strictly as the cooperative aggregation of the individual states, while the Whigs saw the entire nation as a distinct entity.^[72]

Carl Lane argues "securing national debt freedom was a core element of Jacksonian democracy". Paying off the national debt was a high priority which would make a reality of the Jeffersonian vision of America truly free from rich bankers, self-sufficient in world affairs, virtuous at home, and administered by a small government not prone to financial corruption or payoffs.^[3]

What became of Jacksonian Democracy, according toSean Wilentz was diffusion. Many ex-Jacksonians turned their crusade against the Money Power into one against the Slave Power and became Republicans. He points to the struggle over theWilmot Proviso of 1846, theFree Soil Party revolt of 1848, and the mass defections from the Democrats in 1854 over theKansas–Nebraska Act. Other Jacksonian leaders such as Chief JusticeRoger B. Taney endorsed slaveholding rights through the 1857Dred Scott ruling. Southern Jacksonians overwhelmingly endorsed secession in 1861, apart from a few opponents led byAndrew Johnson. In the North, Jacksonians Martin Van Buren, Stephen A. Douglas and theWar Democrats fiercely opposed secession, while Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan and theCopperheads did not.^[73]

In addition to Jackson, his second vice president and one of the key organizational leaders of the Jacksonian Democratic Party,Martin Van Buren, handily won theelection of 1836. He helped shape modern presidential campaign organizations and methods.^[74]

Van Buren was defeated in 1840 by WhigWilliam Henry Harrison in a landslide. Harrison died just one month into his term and his vice president,John Tyler, quickly reached accommodation with the Jacksonians. Tyler was then succeeded byJames K. Polk, a Jacksonian who won theelection of 1844 with Jackson's endorsement.^[75] Polk was so closely aligned with Jackson he was sometimes called "Young Hickory."^[76]Franklin Pierce had been a supporter of Jackson as well.James Buchanan served in Jackson's administration as minister to Russia and as Polk's secretary of state, but he did not pursue Jacksonian policies. Finally,Andrew Johnson, who had been a strong supporter of Jackson, became president following theassassination of Abraham Lincoln in 1865, but by then Jacksonian democracy had been pushed off the stage of American politics.^[77]

Donald Trump has been described as a "Jacksonian" for his similarupset victory, populistrhetoric, and opportunistic foreign policy.^{[78][79][80][81]} He also maintains a personal affinity toward President Jackson and hung his portrait in theOval Office during his tenure as president.^[82][83]

Jackson himself was used variously as a signifier of partisan allegiances. It was said that in Mississippi, an overwhelmingly Democratic state, "Jackson's word was 'considered as binding as the Koran, his will a rule of action—his name too sacred to be uttered without a blessing.'"^[84]

• Andrew Jackson 1828 presidential campaign
• History of the Democratic Party (United States)
• Jeffersonian democracy
• Native American genocide
• Populism in the United States
• Voting rights in the United States

• American Political History OnlineArchived 2015-08-01 at theWayback Machine
• Second Party System 1824–1860 short essays by scholar Michael Holt
• Tales of the Early Republic collection of texts and encyclopedia entries on Jacksonian Era, by Hal Morris
• Register of Debates in Congress, 1824–1837; complete text; searchable
• Daniel Webster
  • debate, 1830 on nullification & tariff^{[permanent dead link]}
  • The works of Daniel Webster... 6 vol, 1853 edition
• Documents on Indian removal 1831–1833
• War with Mexico: linksArchived 2015-08-01 at theWayback Machine
• Hammond, The history of political parties in the state of New-York(1850) history to 1840 from MOA Michigan
• Triumph of Nationalism 1815–1850 study guides & teaching tools

• Jacksonian democracy
• 1820s in American politics
• 1830s in American politics
• 1840s in American politics
• 1850s in American politics
• Agrarian politics
• American political philosophy
• Andrew Jackson
• Antebellum South
• Classical liberalism
• Democratization
• Eponymous political ideologies
• Factions in the Democratic Party (United States)
• History of United States expansionism
• Jacksonians
• Liberalism in the United States
• Political history of the United States
• Political ideologies
• Populism in the United States
• Radicalism (historical)
• Second Party System
• Slavery in the United States
• Types of democracy
• White nationalism in the United States

• Webarchive template wayback links
• Articles with short description
• Short description is different from Wikidata
• Use mdy dates from March 2024
• Use American English from March 2024
• All Wikipedia articles written in American English
• Pages using sidebar with the child parameter
• All articles with unsourced statements
• Articles with unsourced statements from January 2025
• All articles with dead external links
• Articles with dead external links from October 2022
• Articles with permanently dead external links
• Articles with dead external links from November 2017