| J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B. | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued November 2, 1993 Decided April 19, 1994 | |
| Full case name | J. E. B., Petitioner v. Alabama ex rel. T. B. |
| Citations | 511U.S.127 (more) 114 S.Ct. 1419; 128L. Ed. 2d 89; 1994U.S. LEXIS 3121; 62 USLW 4219; 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) ¶ 42,967 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Certiorari to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals 606 So.2d 156 |
| Holding | |
| Intentional discrimination on the basis of gender by state actors in the use of peremptory strikes in jury selection violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Blackmun, joined by Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg |
| Concurrence | O'Connor |
| Concurrence | Kennedy |
| Dissent | Rehnquist |
| Dissent | Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, Thomas |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. XIV | |
 | This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
|
J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994), was alandmark decision of theSupreme Court of the United States holding thatperemptory challenges based solely on a prospective juror's sex are unconstitutional.[1]J.E.B. extended the court's existing precedent inBatson v. Kentucky (1986), which found race-based peremptory challenges in criminal trials unconstitutional,[2] andEdmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company (1991), which extended that principle to civil trials.[3] As inBatson, the court found that sex-based challenges violate theEqual Protection Clause.[citation needed]
On behalf of T.B., the mother of a minor child, the state sued J.E.B. forchild support inJackson County, Alabama. During jury selection, challenges intentionally targeted male potential jurors resulting in an all-female jury.[citation needed]
![[icon]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=https%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aWiki_letter_w_cropped.svg) | This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding missing information.(August 2022) |
The majority opinion was written byJustice Blackmun.Justice O'Connor wrote a concurring opinion, andJustice Kennedy separately concurred in the judgment.Chief Justice Rehnquist filed a separate dissenting opinion.Justice Scalia also filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined byChief Justice Rehnquist andJustice Thomas.[citation needed]
 | This article related to a case of theSupreme Court of the United States of theRehnquist Court is astub. You can help Wikipedia byadding missing information. |
