| ||||||||||||||||||
Oganesson (118Og) is asynthetic element created inparticle accelerators, and thus astandard atomic weight cannot be given. Like all synthetic elements, it has nostable isotopes. The first and onlyisotope to be synthesized was294Og in 2002 and 2005; it has ahalf-life of 0.7 milliseconds.
| Nuclide | Z | N | Isotopic mass(Da)[4] [n 1][n 2] | Half-life[1] | Decay mode[1] | Daughter isotope | Spin and parity[1] | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 294Og | 118 | 176 | 294.21398(59)# | 0.58+0.44 −0.18 ms [0.7(3) ms] | α | 290Lv | 0+ | ||||||||||||
| This table header & footer: | |||||||||||||||||||
The below table contains various combinations of targets and projectiles that could be used to form compound nuclei with Z=118.[citation needed]
| Target | Projectile | CN | Attempt result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 208Pb | 86Kr | 294Og | Failure to date |
| 238U | 58Fe | 296Og | Reaction yet to be attempted |
| 244Pu | 54Cr | 298Og | Reaction yet to be attempted |
| 248Cm | 50Ti | 298Og | Failure to date |
| 250Cm | 50Ti | 300Og | Reaction yet to be attempted |
| 249Cf | 48Ca | 297Og | Successful reaction |
| 250Cf | 48Ca | 298Og | Failure to date |
| 251Cf | 48Ca | 299Og | Failure to date |
| 252Cf | 48Ca | 300Og | Reaction yet to be attempted |
In 1999, a team led byVictor Ninov at theLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory performed this experiment, as a 1998 calculation byRobert Smolańczuk suggested a promising outcome. After eleven days of irradiation, three events of293Og and itsalpha decay products were reported in this reaction; this was the first reported discovery of element 118 and then-unknownelement 116.[5]
The following year, they published aretraction after researchers at other laboratories were unable to duplicate the results and the Berkeley lab could not duplicate them either.[6] In June 2002, the director of the lab announced that the original claim of the discovery of these two elements had been based on data fabricated by principal author Victor Ninov.[7][8] Newer experimental results and theoretical predictions have confirmed the exponential decrease in cross-sections with lead and bismuth targets as the atomic number of the resulting nuclide increases.[9]
Following successful experiments utilizingcalcium-48 projectiles and actinide targets to generate elements114 and 116,[10] the search for element 118 was first performed at theJoint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in 2002. One or two atoms of294Og were produced in the 2002 experiment, and two more atoms were produced in a 2005 confirmation run. The discovery of element 118 was announced in 2006.[2]
Because of the very smallfusion reaction probability (the fusioncross section is roughly 0.3–0.6 pb), the experiment took four months and involved a beam dose of2.5×1019calcium ions that had to be shot at thecalifornium target to produce the first recorded event believed to be the synthesis of oganesson.[11]Nevertheless, researchers were highly confident that the results were not afalse positive; the chance that they were random events was estimated to be less than one part in 100,000.[12]
In a 2012 experiment aimed at the confirmation oftennessine, one alpha decay chain was attributed to294Og. This synthesis event resulted from the population of249Cf in the target as the decay product of the249Bk target (half-life 330 days); the cross section and decays were consistent with previously reported observations of294Og.[10]
From 1 October 2015 until 6 April 2016, the team at the JINR conducted a search for new isotopes of oganesson using a48Ca beam and a target comprising a mixture of249Cf (50.7%),250Cf (12.9%), and251Cf (36.4%). The experiment was performed at 252 MeV and 258 MeV beam energies. One event of294Og was found at the lower beam energy, while no decays of oganesson isotopes were found at the higher beam energy; a cross section of 0.9 pb for the249Cf(48Ca,3n) reaction was estimated.[13]
In the 2015–2016 experiment, these reactions were performed in a search for295Og and296Og. No events attributable to a reaction with the250Cf or251Cf portions of the target were found. A repeat of this experiment was planned for 2017–2018.[13]
This reaction was originally planned to be tested at the JINR andRIKEN in 2017–2018, as it uses the same50Ti projectile as planned experiments leading to elements119 and120.[14] A search at RIKEN using this reaction (with the 3n, 4n, and 5n channels leading respectively to295Og,294Og, and293Og) was unsuccessful.[15][16] The experiment ran for 39 days in 2017, before it was paused to search for element 119 in the248Cm(51V,xn)299−x119 reaction instead. An upper limit of 0.50 pb for the cross-section was obtained; this is the same cross-section for the successful249Cf(48Ca,3n)294Og reaction (0.5+1.6
−0.3 pb) and an order of magnitude greater than the theoretical cross-section for the50Ti reaction (50 fb). This is consistent with the experimental cross-sections of48Ca- and50Ti-induced reactions yieldinglivermorium isotopes. The RIKEN team estimates that the necessary sensitivity level for the production of oganesson isotopes in the248Cm+50Ti reaction could be reached with 50 days of irradiation at a 1 pµA mean intensity, which is realistically achievable given the technological possibilities available at experimental facilities in 2025.[17]
Theoretical calculations done on the synthetic pathways for, and the half-life of, other isotopes have shown that some could be slightly more stable than the synthesized isotope294Og, most likely293Og,295Og,296Og,297Og,298Og,300Og and302Og.[18][19][20] Of these,297Og might provide the best chances for obtaining longer-lived nuclei,[18][20] and thus might become the focus of future work with this element. Some isotopes with many more neutrons, such as some located around313Og, could also provide longer-lived nuclei.[21]
The below table contains various targets-projectile combinations for which calculations have provided estimates for cross section yields from various neutron evaporation channels. The channel with the highest expected yield is given.
DNS = Di-nuclear system; 2S = Two-step; σ = cross section
| Target | Projectile | CN | Channel (product) | σmax | Model | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 208Pb | 86Kr | 294Og | 1n (293Og) | 0.1 pb | DNS | [22] |
| 208Pb | 85Kr | 293Og | 1n (292Og) | 0.18 pb | DNS | [22] |
| 246Cm | 50Ti | 296Og | 3n (293Og) | 40 fb | 2S | [23] |
| 244Cm | 50Ti | 294Og | 2n (292Og) | 53 fb | 2S | [23] |
| 252Cf | 48Ca | 300Og | 3n (297Og) | 1.2 pb | DNS | [24] |
| 251Cf | 48Ca | 299Og | 3n (296Og) | 1.2 pb | DNS | [24] |
| 249Cf | 48Ca | 297Og | 3n (294Og) | 0.3 pb | DNS | [24] |
I would say we're very confident.