Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Isotopes of oganesson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Isotopes ofoganesson (118Og)
Main isotopes[1]Decay
Isotopeabun­dancehalf-life(t1/2)modepro­duct
294Ogsynth0.7 ms[2][3]α290Lv
SF

Oganesson (118Og) is asynthetic element created inparticle accelerators, and thus astandard atomic weight cannot be given. Like all synthetic elements, it has nostable isotopes. The first and onlyisotope to be synthesized was294Og in 2002 and 2005; it has ahalf-life of 0.7 milliseconds.

List of isotopes

[edit]


Nuclide
ZNIsotopic mass(Da)[4]
[n 1][n 2]
Half-life[1]
Decay
mode
[1]
Daughter
isotope

Spin and
parity[1]
294Og118176294.21398(59)#0.58+0.44
−0.18
 ms

[0.7(3) ms]
α290Lv0+
This table header & footer:
  1. ^( ) – Uncertainty (1σ) is given in concise form in parentheses after the corresponding last digits.
  2. ^# – Atomic mass marked #: value and uncertainty derived not from purely experimental data, but at least partly from trends from the Mass Surface (TMS).

Nucleosynthesis

[edit]

Target-projectile combinations leading to Z=118 compound nuclei

[edit]

The below table contains various combinations of targets and projectiles that could be used to form compound nuclei with Z=118.[citation needed]

TargetProjectileCNAttempt result
208Pb86Kr294OgFailure to date
238U58Fe296OgReaction yet to be attempted
244Pu54Cr298OgReaction yet to be attempted
248Cm50Ti298OgFailure to date
250Cm50Ti300OgReaction yet to be attempted
249Cf48Ca297OgSuccessful reaction
250Cf48Ca298OgFailure to date
251Cf48Ca299OgFailure to date
252Cf48Ca300OgReaction yet to be attempted

Cold fusion

[edit]

208Pb(86Kr,xn)294-xOg

[edit]

In 1999, a team led byVictor Ninov at theLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory performed this experiment, as a 1998 calculation byRobert Smolańczuk suggested a promising outcome. After eleven days of irradiation, three events of293Og and itsalpha decay products were reported in this reaction; this was the first reported discovery of element 118 and then-unknownelement 116.[5]

The following year, they published aretraction after researchers at other laboratories were unable to duplicate the results and the Berkeley lab could not duplicate them either.[6] In June 2002, the director of the lab announced that the original claim of the discovery of these two elements had been based on data fabricated by principal author Victor Ninov.[7][8] Newer experimental results and theoretical predictions have confirmed the exponential decrease in cross-sections with lead and bismuth targets as the atomic number of the resulting nuclide increases.[9]

Hot fusion

[edit]

249Cf(48Ca,xn)297-xOg (x=3)

[edit]

Following successful experiments utilizingcalcium-48 projectiles and actinide targets to generate elements114 and 116,[10] the search for element 118 was first performed at theJoint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in 2002. One or two atoms of294Og were produced in the 2002 experiment, and two more atoms were produced in a 2005 confirmation run. The discovery of element 118 was announced in 2006.[2]

Because of the very smallfusion reaction probability (the fusioncross section is roughly 0.3–0.6 pb), the experiment took four months and involved a beam dose of2.5×1019calcium ions that had to be shot at thecalifornium target to produce the first recorded event believed to be the synthesis of oganesson.[11]Nevertheless, researchers were highly confident that the results were not afalse positive; the chance that they were random events was estimated to be less than one part in 100,000.[12]

In a 2012 experiment aimed at the confirmation oftennessine, one alpha decay chain was attributed to294Og. This synthesis event resulted from the population of249Cf in the target as the decay product of the249Bk target (half-life 330 days); the cross section and decays were consistent with previously reported observations of294Og.[10]

From 1 October 2015 until 6 April 2016, the team at the JINR conducted a search for new isotopes of oganesson using a48Ca beam and a target comprising a mixture of249Cf (50.7%),250Cf (12.9%), and251Cf (36.4%). The experiment was performed at 252 MeV and 258 MeV beam energies. One event of294Og was found at the lower beam energy, while no decays of oganesson isotopes were found at the higher beam energy; a cross section of 0.9 pb for the249Cf(48Ca,3n) reaction was estimated.[13]

250,251Cf(48Ca,xn)298,299-xOg

[edit]

In the 2015–2016 experiment, these reactions were performed in a search for295Og and296Og. No events attributable to a reaction with the250Cf or251Cf portions of the target were found. A repeat of this experiment was planned for 2017–2018.[13]

248Cm(50Ti,xn)298-xOg

[edit]

This reaction was originally planned to be tested at the JINR andRIKEN in 2017–2018, as it uses the same50Ti projectile as planned experiments leading to elements119 and120.[14] A search at RIKEN using this reaction (with the 3n, 4n, and 5n channels leading respectively to295Og,294Og, and293Og) was unsuccessful.[15][16] The experiment ran for 39 days in 2017, before it was paused to search for element 119 in the248Cm(51V,xn)299−x119 reaction instead. An upper limit of 0.50 pb for the cross-section was obtained; this is the same cross-section for the successful249Cf(48Ca,3n)294Og reaction (0.5+1.6
−0.3
 pb
) and an order of magnitude greater than the theoretical cross-section for the50Ti reaction (50 fb). This is consistent with the experimental cross-sections of48Ca- and50Ti-induced reactions yieldinglivermorium isotopes. The RIKEN team estimates that the necessary sensitivity level for the production of oganesson isotopes in the248Cm+50Ti reaction could be reached with 50 days of irradiation at a 1 pµA mean intensity, which is realistically achievable given the technological possibilities available at experimental facilities in 2025.[17]

Theoretical calculations

[edit]

Theoretical calculations done on the synthetic pathways for, and the half-life of, other isotopes have shown that some could be slightly more stable than the synthesized isotope294Og, most likely293Og,295Og,296Og,297Og,298Og,300Og and302Og.[18][19][20] Of these,297Og might provide the best chances for obtaining longer-lived nuclei,[18][20] and thus might become the focus of future work with this element. Some isotopes with many more neutrons, such as some located around313Og, could also provide longer-lived nuclei.[21]

Theoretical calculations on evaporation cross sections

[edit]

The below table contains various targets-projectile combinations for which calculations have provided estimates for cross section yields from various neutron evaporation channels. The channel with the highest expected yield is given.

DNS = Di-nuclear system; 2S = Two-step; σ = cross section

TargetProjectileCNChannel (product)σmaxModelRef
208Pb86Kr294Og1n (293Og)0.1 pbDNS[22]
208Pb85Kr293Og1n (292Og)0.18 pbDNS[22]
246Cm50Ti296Og3n (293Og)40 fb2S[23]
244Cm50Ti294Og2n (292Og)53 fb2S[23]
252Cf48Ca300Og3n (297Og)1.2 pbDNS[24]
251Cf48Ca299Og3n (296Og)1.2 pbDNS[24]
249Cf48Ca297Og3n (294Og)0.3 pbDNS[24]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdKondev, F. G.; Wang, M.; Huang, W. J.; Naimi, S.; Audi, G. (2021)."The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear properties"(PDF).Chinese Physics C.45 (3) 030001.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddae.
  2. ^abOganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V. K.; Lobanov, Yu. V.; Abdullin, F. Sh.; Polyakov, A. N.; Sagaidak, R. N.; Shirokovsky, I. V.; Tsyganov, Yu. S.; et al. (2006-10-09)."Synthesis of the isotopes of elements 118 and 116 in the249Cf and245Cm+48Ca fusion reactions".Physical Review C.74 (4) 044602.Bibcode:2006PhRvC..74d4602O.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.74.044602. Retrieved2008-01-18.
  3. ^Oganessian, Yuri Ts.; Rykaczewski, Krzysztof P. (August 2015). "A beachhead on the island of stability".Physics Today.68 (8):32–38.Bibcode:2015PhT....68h..32O.doi:10.1063/PT.3.2880.OSTI 1337838.
  4. ^Wang, Meng; Huang, W.J.; Kondev, F.G.; Audi, G.; Naimi, S. (2021). "The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references*".Chinese Physics C.45 (3) 030003.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf.
  5. ^Hoffman, D.C; Ghiorso, A.; Seaborg, G.T. (2000).The Transuranium People: The Inside Story. Imperial College Press. pp. 425–431.ISBN 978-1-86094-087-3.
  6. ^Public Affairs Department (21 July 2001)."Results of element 118 experiment retracted". Berkeley Lab. Archived fromthe original on 29 January 2008. Retrieved18 January 2008.
  7. ^Dalton, R. (2002). "Misconduct: The stars who fell to Earth".Nature.420 (6917):728–729.Bibcode:2002Natur.420..728D.doi:10.1038/420728a.PMID 12490902.S2CID 4398009.
  8. ^Element 118 disappears two years after it was discoveredArchived 2007-10-12 at theWayback Machine. Physicsworld.com. Retrieved on 2 April 2012.
  9. ^Zagrebaev, Valeriy; Karpov, Alexander; Greiner, Walter (2013)."Future of superheavy element research: Which nuclei could be synthesized within the next few years?"(PDF).Journal of Physics.420 (1) 012001.arXiv:1207.5700.Bibcode:2013JPhCS.420a2001Z.doi:10.1088/1742-6596/420/1/012001.S2CID 55434734. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2015-10-03. Retrieved2019-07-31.
  10. ^abOganessian, Y.T. (2015)."Super-heavy element research".Reports on Progress in Physics.78 (3) 036301.Bibcode:2015RPPh...78c6301O.doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/3/036301.PMID 25746203.S2CID 37779526.
  11. ^"Ununoctium". WebElements Periodic Table. Retrieved2007-12-09.
  12. ^Jacoby, Mitch (17 October 2006)."Element 118 Detected, With Confidence".Chemical & Engineering News.84 (43): 11.doi:10.1021/cen-v084n043.p011. Retrieved18 January 2008.I would say we're very confident.
  13. ^abVoinov, A.A.; et al. (2018)."Study of the249-251Cf +48Ca reactions: recent results and outlook".Journal of Physics: Conference Series.966 (1) 012057.Bibcode:2018JPhCS.966a2057V.doi:10.1088/1742-6596/966/1/012057.
  14. ^Roberto, J. B. (31 March 2015)."Actinide Targets for Super-Heavy Element Research"(PDF).cyclotron.tamu.edu. Texas A & M University. Retrieved28 April 2017.
  15. ^Hauschild, K. (26 June 2019).Superheavy nuclei at RIKEN, Dubna, and JYFL(PDF). Conseil Scientifique de l'IN2P3. Retrieved31 July 2019.
  16. ^Hauschild, K. (2019).Heavy nuclei at RIKEN, Dubna, and JYFL(PDF). Conseil Scientifique de l'IN2P3. Retrieved1 August 2019.
  17. ^Gall, Benoît Jean-Paul; Morita, Kosuke; Morimoto, Kouji; et al. (2025)."Upper Limit for the248Cm(50Ti,xn)298−xOg Reaction Cross Section".Journal of the Physical Society of Japan.94 (94201).doi:10.7566/JPSJ.94.094201. Retrieved16 November 2025.
  18. ^abP. Roy Chowdhury; C. Samanta; D. N. Basu (January 26, 2006)."α decay half-lives of new superheavy elements".Physical Review C.73 (1) 014612.arXiv:nucl-th/0507054.Bibcode:2006PhRvC..73a4612C.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.73.014612.S2CID 118739116. Retrieved2008-01-18.
  19. ^C. Samanta; P. Roy Chowdhury; D. N. Basu (April 6, 2007). "Predictions of alpha decay half lives of heavy and superheavy elements".Nuclear Physics A.789 (1–4):142–154.arXiv:nucl-th/0703086.Bibcode:2007NuPhA.789..142S.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.264.8177.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.04.001.S2CID 7496348.
  20. ^abG. Royer; K. Zbiri; C. Bonilla (2004). "Entrance channels and alpha decay half-lives of the heaviest elements".Nuclear Physics A.730 (3–4):355–376.arXiv:nucl-th/0410048.Bibcode:2004NuPhA.730..355R.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.010.
  21. ^S. B. Duarte; O. A. P. Tavares; M. Gonçalves; O. Rodríguez; F. Guzmán; T. N. Barbosa; F. García; A. Dimarco (2004). "Half-life predictions for decay modes of superheavy nuclei".Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics.30 (10):1487–1494.Bibcode:2004JPhG...30.1487D.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.692.3012.doi:10.1088/0954-3899/30/10/014.
  22. ^abFeng, Zhao-Qing; Jin, Gen-Ming; Li, Jun-Qing; Scheid, Werner (2007). "Formation of superheavy nuclei in cold fusion reactions".Physical Review C.76 (4) 044606.arXiv:0707.2588.Bibcode:2007PhRvC..76d4606F.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.044606.S2CID 711489.
  23. ^abLiu, L.; Shen, C.; Li, Q.; Tu, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y. (2016). "Residue cross sections of50Ti-induced fusion reactions based on the two-step model".European Physical Journal A.52 (35): 35.arXiv:1512.06504.Bibcode:2016EPJA...52...35L.doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16035-0.S2CID 254116073.
  24. ^abcFeng, Z; Jin, G; Li, J; Scheid, W (2009). "Production of heavy and superheavy nuclei in massive fusion reactions".Nuclear Physics A.816 (1–4):33–51.arXiv:0803.1117.Bibcode:2009NuPhA.816...33F.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.11.003.S2CID 18647291.
Group12 3456789101112131415161718
PeriodHydrogen and
alkali metals
Alkaline
earth metals
Pnicto­gensChal­co­gensHalo­gensNoble gases
12
345678910
1112131415161718
192021222324252627282930313233343536
373839404142434445464748495051525354
55561 asterisk71727374757677787980818283848586
87881 asterisk103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118
119120
1 asterisk5758596061626364656667686970 
1 asterisk8990919293949596979899100101102
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isotopes_of_oganesson&oldid=1336643105"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp