Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Isotopes of hassium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Isotopes ofhassium (108Hs)
Main isotopes[1]Decay
Isotopeabun­dancehalf-life(t1/2)modepro­duct
269Hssynth13 sα265Sg
270Hssynth7.6 sα266Sg
271Hssynth46 sα267Sg
277mHssynth130 s?SF

Hassium (108Hs) is asynthetic element, and thus astandard atomic weight cannot be given. Like all synthetic elements, it has nostable isotopes. The firstisotope to be synthesized was265Hs in 1984. There are 13 known isotopes from263Hs to277Hs and up to sixisomers. The most stable known isotope is271Hs, with a half-life of about 46 seconds, though this assignment is not definite due to uncertainty arising from a low number of measurements. The isotopes269Hs and270Hs respectively have half-lives of about 13 seconds and 7.6 seconds. It is also possible that the isomer277mHs is more stable than these, but only one event of the decay of this isomer has been registered as of 2020.[1][2]

List of isotopes

[edit]


Nuclide
[n 1]
ZNIsotopic mass(Da)[3]
[n 2][n 3]
Half-life[1]
Decay
mode
[1]
[n 4]
Daughter
isotope

Spin and
parity[1]
[n 5]
Excitation energy
263Hs108155263.12848(21)#0.74+0.48
−0.21
 ms

[0.9(4) ms]
α259Sg3/2+#
264Hs108156264.12836(3)0.63+0.34
−0.16
 s

[0.7(3) s]
α (70%)260Sg0+
SF (30%)(various)
265Hs108157265.129792(26)1.96(16) msα261Sg9/2+#
265mHs229(22) keV300+200
−100
 μs

[360(150) μs]
α261Sg3/2+#
266Hs[n 6]108158266.130049(29)3.0(6) msα (76%)262Sg0+
SF (24%)(various)
266mHs1100(90) keV74+354
−34
 ms

[280(220) ms]
α262Sg9-#
267Hs108159267.13168(10)#52+13
−8
 ms

[55(11) ms]
α263Sg5/2+#
267mHs[n 7]39(24) keV940+120
−45
 μs

[990(90) μs]
α263Sg
268Hs108160268.13201(32)#0.38+1.8
−0.17
 s

[1.4(1.1) s]
α264Sg0+
269Hs108161269.13365(14)#13+10
−4
 s
[4]
α265Sg9/2+#
269mHs[4]20 keV#2.8+13.6
−1.3
 s
α265mSg1/2#
IT269Hs
270Hs108162270.13431(27)#7.6+4.9
−2.2
 s

[9(4) s]
α266Sg0+
271Hs108163271.13708(30)#46+56
−16
 s
[4]
α267Sg11/2#
271mHs[4]20 keV#7.1+8.4
−2.5
 s
α267mSg3/2#
IT271Hs
272Hs[n 8][5]108164272.13849(55)#160+190
−60
 ms
α268Sg0+
273Hs[n 9]108165273.14146(40)#0.68+0.30
−0.16
 s
[6]
[1.06(50) s]
α269Sg3/2+#
275Hs[n 10]108167275.14653(64)#600+230
−130
 ms
[7]
α271Sg
SF (<11%)(various)
277Hs[n 11]108169277.15177(48)#18+25
−7
 ms
[8]
SF(various)3/2+#
277mHs[n 7][n 11]100(100) keV#34+166
−16
 s

[130(100) s]
SF(various)
278Hs[n 12]108170278.15375(32)#SF(various)0+
This table header & footer:
  1. ^mHs – Excitednuclear isomer.
  2. ^( ) – Uncertainty (1σ) is given in concise form in parentheses after the corresponding last digits.
  3. ^# – Atomic mass marked #: value and uncertainty derived not from purely experimental data, but at least partly from trends from the Mass Surface (TMS).
  4. ^Modes of decay:
    SF:Spontaneous fission
  5. ^# – Values marked # are not purely derived from experimental data, but at least partly from trends of neighboring nuclides (TNN).
  6. ^Not directly synthesized, occurs asdecay product of270Ds
  7. ^abExistence of this isomer is unconfirmed
  8. ^Not directly synthesized, occurs in decay chain of276Ds
  9. ^Not directly synthesized, occurs in decay chain of285Fl
  10. ^Not directly synthesized, occurs in decay chain of287Fl
  11. ^abNot directly synthesized, occurs in decay chain of289Fl
  12. ^Not directly synthesized, occurs in decay chain of290Fl, unconfirmed

Isotopes and nuclear properties

[edit]

Target-projectile combinations leading toZ=108 compound nuclei

[edit]
TargetProjectileCNAttempt result
136Xe136Xe272HsFailure to date
198Pt70Zn268HsFailure to date[9]
208Pb58Fe266HsSuccessful reaction
207Pb58Fe265HsSuccessful reaction
208Pb56Fe264HsSuccessful reaction
207Pb56Fe263HsReaction yet to be attempted
206Pb58Fe264HsSuccessful reaction
209Bi55Mn264HsFailure to date
226Ra48Ca274HsSuccessful reaction
232Th40Ar272HsReaction yet to be attempted
238U36S274HsSuccessful reaction
238U34S272HsSuccessful reaction
244Pu30Si274HsReaction yet to be attempted
248Cm26Mg274HsSuccessful reaction
248Cm25Mg273HsFailure to date
250Cm26Mg276HsReaction yet to be attempted
249Cf22Ne271HsSuccessful reaction

Nucleosynthesis

[edit]

Superheavy elements such as hassium are produced by bombarding lighter elements inparticle accelerators that inducefusion reactions. Whereas most of the isotopes of hassium can be synthesized directly this way, some heavier ones have only been observed as decay products of elements with higheratomic numbers.[10]

Depending on the energies involved, the former are separated into "hot" and "cold". In hot fusion reactions, very light, high-energy projectiles are accelerated toward very heavy targets (actinides), giving rise to compound nuclei at high excitation energy (~40–50 MeV) that may either fission or evaporate several (3 to 5) neutrons.[11] In cold fusion reactions, the produced fused nuclei have a relatively low excitation energy (~10–20 MeV), which decreases the probability that these products will undergo fission reactions. As the fused nuclei cool to theground state, they require emission of only one or two neutrons, and thus, allows for the generation of more neutron-rich products.[10] The latter is a distinct concept from that of where nuclear fusion claimed to be achieved at room temperature conditions (seecold fusion).[12]

Cold fusion

[edit]

Before the first successful synthesis of hassium in 1984 by the GSI team, scientists at theJoint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) inDubna,Russia also tried to synthesize hassium by bombarding lead-208 with iron-58 in 1978. No hassium atoms were identified. They repeated the experiment in 1984 and were able to detect aspontaneous fission activity assigned to260Sg, thedaughter of264Hs.[13] Later that year, they tried the experiment again, and tried to chemically identify thedecay products of hassium to provide support to their synthesis of element 108. They were able to detect severalalpha decays of253Es and253Fm, decay products of265Hs.[14]

In the official discovery of the element in 1984, the team at GSI studied the same reaction using the alpha decay genetic correlation method and were able to positively identify 3 atoms of265Hs.[15] After an upgrade of their facilities in 1993, the team repeated the experiment in 1994 and detected 75 atoms of265Hs and 2 atoms of264Hs, during the measurement of a partial excitation function for the 1n neutron evaporation channel.[16] A further run of the reaction was conducted in late 1997 in which a further 20 atoms were detected.[17] This discovery experiment was successfully repeated in 2002 atRIKEN (10 atoms) and in 2003 atGANIL (7 atoms). The team at RIKEN further studied the reaction in 2008 in order to conduct the first spectroscopic studies of theeven-even nucleus264Hs. They were also able to detect a further 29 atoms of265Hs.

The team at Dubna also conducted the analogous reaction with alead-207 target instead of a lead-208 target in 1984:

207
82
Pb
+58
26
Fe
264
108
Hs
+n

They were able to detect the same spontaneous fission activity as observed in the reaction with a lead-208 target and once again assigned it to260Sg, daughter of264Hs.[14] The team atGSI first studied the reaction in 1986 using the method of genetic correlation of alpha decays and identified a single atom of264Hs with a cross section of 3.2 pb.[18] The reaction was repeated in 1994 and the team were able to measure bothalpha decay andspontaneous fission for264Hs. This reaction was also studied in 2008 at RIKEN in order to conduct the first spectroscopic studies of theeven-even nucleus264Hs. The team detected 11 atoms of264Hs.

In 2008, the team at RIKEN conducted the analogous reaction with alead-206 target for the first time:

206
82
Pb
+58
26
Fe
263
108
Hs
+n

They were able to identify 8 atoms of the new isotope263Hs.[19]

In 2008, the team at theLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) studied the analogous reaction withiron-56 projectiles for the first time:

208
82
Pb
+56
26
Fe
263
108
Hs
+n

They were able to produce and identify six atoms of the new isotope263Hs.[20] A few months later, the RIKEN team also published their results on the same reaction.[21]

Further attempts to synthesise nuclei of hassium were performed the team at Dubna in 1983 using the cold fusion reaction between abismuth-209 target andmanganese-55 projectiles:

209
83
Bi
+55
25
Mn
264−x
108
Hs
+ xn (x = 1 or 2)

They were able to detect a spontaneous fission activity assigned to255Rf, a product of the263Hs decay chain. Identical results were measured in a repeat run in 1984.[14] In a subsequent experiment in 1983, they applied the method of chemical identification of a descendant to provide support to the synthesis of hassium. They were able to detect alpha decays fromfermium isotopes, assigned as descendants of the decay of262Hs. This reaction has not been tried since and262Hs is currently unconfirmed.[14]

Hot fusion

[edit]

Under the leadership ofYuri Oganessian, the team at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research studied the hot fusion reaction betweencalcium-48 projectiles andradium-226 targets in 1978:

226
88
Ra
+48
20
Ca
270
108
Hs
+ 4n

However, results are not available in the literature.[14] The reaction was repeated at the JINR in June 2008 and 4 atoms of the isotope270Hs were detected.[22] In January 2009, the team repeated the experiment and a further 2 atoms of270Hs were detected.[23]

The team at Dubna studied the reaction betweencalifornium-249 targets andneon-22 projectiles in 1983 by detectingspontaneous fission activities:

249
98
Cf
+22
10
Ne
271−x
108
Hs
+ xn

Several short spontaneous fission activities were found, indicating the formation of nuclei of hassium.[14]

The hot fusion reaction betweenuranium-238 targets and projectiles of the rare and expensive isotopesulfur-36 was conducted at the GSI in April–May 2008:

238
92
U
+36
16
S
270
108
Hs
+ 4n

Preliminary results show that a single atom of270Hs was detected. This experiment confirmed the decay properties of the isotopes270Hs and266Sg.[24]

In March 1994, the team at Dubna led by the late Yuri Lazarev attempted the analogous reaction withsulfur-34 projectiles:

238
92
U
+34
16
S
272−x
108
Hs
+ xn (x = 4 or 5)

They announced the detection of 3 atoms of267Hs from the 5n neutron evaporation channel.[25] The decay properties were confirmed by the team at GSI in their simultaneous study ofdarmstadtium. The reaction was repeated at the GSI in January–February 2009 in order to search for the new isotope268Hs. The team, led by Prof. Nishio, detected a single atom each of both268Hs and267Hs. The new isotope268Hs underwent alpha decay to the previously known isotope264Sg.

Between May 2001 and August 2005, a GSI–PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) collaboration studied the nuclear reaction betweencurium-248 targets andmagnesium-26 projectiles:

248
96
Cm
+26
12
Mg
274−x
108
Hs
+ xn (x = 3, 4, or 5)

The team studied the excitation function of the 3n, 4n, and 5n evaporation channels leading to the isotopes269Hs,270Hs, and271Hs.[26][27] The synthesis of thedoubly magic isotope270Hs was published in December 2006 by the team of scientists from theTechnical University of Munich.[28] It was reported that this isotope decayed by emission of an alpha particle with an energy of 8.83 MeV and a half-life of ~22 s. This figure has since been revised to 3.6 s.[29]

As decay product

[edit]
List of hassium isotopes observed by decay
Evaporation residueObserved hassium isotope
267Ds263Hs[30]
269Ds265Hs[31]
270Ds266Hs[32]
271Ds267Hs[33]
277Cn,273Ds269Hs[34]
276Ds272Hs[5]
285Fl,281Cn,277Ds273Hs[35]
291Lv,287Fl,283Cn,279Ds275Hs[36]
293Lv,289Fl,285Cn,281Ds277Hs[37][38][39]

Hassium isotopes have been observed as decay products of darmstadtium. Darmstadtium currently has ten known isotopes, all but one of which have been shown to undergo alpha decays to become hassium nuclei withmass numbers between 263 and 277. Hassium isotopes with mass numbers 266, 272, 273, 275, and 277 to date have only been produced by decay of darmstadtium nuclei. Parent darmstadtium nuclei can be themselves decay products ofcopernicium,flerovium, orlivermorium.[29] For example, in 2004, the Dubna team identified hassium-277 as a final product in the decay of livermorium-293 via an alpha decay sequence:[39]

293
116
Lv
289
114
Fl
+4
2
He
289
114
Fl
285
112
Cn
+4
2
He
285
112
Cn
281
110
Ds
+4
2
He
281
110
Ds
277
108
Hs
+4
2
He

Unconfirmed isotopes

[edit]
277mHs

An isotope assigned to277Hs has been observed on one occasion decaying by SF with a long half-life of ~11 minutes.[40] The isotope is not observed in the decay of the ground state of281Ds but is observed in the decay from a rare, as yet unconfirmed isomeric level, namely281mDs. The half-life is very long for the ground state and it is possible that it belongs to an isomeric level in277Hs. It has also been suggested that this activity actually comes from278Bh, formed as the great-great-granddaughter of290Fl through one electron capture to290Nh and three further alpha decays. Furthermore, in 2009, the team at the GSI observed a small alpha decay branch for281Ds producing the nuclide277Hs decaying by SF in a short lifetime. The measured half-life is close to the expected value for ground state isomer,277Hs. Further research is required to confirm the production of the isomer.

Retracted isotopes

[edit]
273Hs

In 1999, American scientists at the University of California, Berkeley, announced that they had succeeded in synthesizing three atoms of293118.[41] These parent nuclei were reported to have successively emitted three alpha particles to form hassium-273 nuclei, which were claimed to have undergone an alpha decay, emitting alpha particles with decay energies of 9.78 and 9.47 MeV and half-life 1.2 s, but their claim was retracted in 2001.[42] The isotope, however, was produced in 2010 by the same team. The new data matched the previous (fabricated)[43] data.[35]

270Hs: prospects for a deformed doubly magic nucleus

[edit]

According to macroscopic-microscopic (MM) theory,Z = 108 is a deformed proton magic number, in combination with the neutron shell atN = 162. This means that such nuclei are permanently deformed in their ground state but have high, narrow fission barriers to further deformation and hence relatively long SF partial half-lives. The SF half-lives in this region are typically reduced by a factor of 109 in comparison with those in the vicinity of the spherical doubly magic nucleus298Fl, caused by an increase in the probability of barrier penetration by quantum tunnelling, due to the narrower fission barrier.In addition,N = 162 has been calculated as a deformed neutron magic number and hence the nucleus270Hs has promise as a deformed doubly magic nucleus. Experimental data from the decay ofZ = 110 isotopes271Ds and273Ds, provides strong evidence for the magic nature of theN = 162 sub-shell. The recent synthesis of269Hs,270Hs, and271Hs also fully support the assignment ofN = 162 as a magic closed shell. In particular, the low decay energy for270Hs is in complete agreement with calculations.[44]

Evidence for theZ = 108 deformed proton shell

[edit]

Evidence for the magicity of theZ = 108 proton shell can be deemed from two sources:

  1. the variation in the partialspontaneous fission half-lives for isotones
  2. the large gap in Qα forisotonic pairs betweenZ = 108 andZ = 110.

For SF, it is necessary to measure the half-lives for the isotonic nuclei268Sg,270Hs and272Ds. Since fission of270Hs has not been measured, detailed data of268Sg fission is not yet available,[5] and272Ds is still unknown, this method cannot be used to date to confirm the stabilizing nature of theZ = 108 shell.However, good evidence for the magicity ofZ = 108 can be deemed from the large differences in the alpha decay energies measured for270Hs,271Ds and273Ds. More conclusive evidence would come from the determination of the decay energy of the yet-unknown nuclide272Ds.

Nuclear isomerism

[edit]
277Hs

An isotope assigned to277Hs has been observed on one occasion decaying by spontaneous fission with a long half-life of ~11 minutes.[45] The isotope is not observed in the decay of the most commonisomer of281Ds but is observed in the decay from a rare, as yet unconfirmed isomeric level, namely281mDs. The half-life is very long for the ground state and it is possible that it belongs to an isomeric level in277Hs. Furthermore, in 2009, the team at the GSI observed a small alpha decay branch for281Ds producing an isotope of277Hs decaying by spontaneous fission with a short lifetime. The measured half-life is close to the expected value for ground state isomer,277Hs. Further research is required to confirm the production of the isomer.[37] A more recent study suggests that this observed activity may actually be from278Bh.[46]

269Hs

The direct synthesis of269Hs has resulted in the observation of three alpha particles with energies 9.21, 9.10, and 8.94 MeV emitted from269Hs atoms. However, when this isotope is indirectly synthesized from the decay of277Cn, only alpha particles with energy 9.21 MeV have been observed, indicating that this decay occurs from an isomeric level. Further research is required to confirm this.[26][34]

267Hs

267Hs is known to decay by alpha decay, emitting alpha particles with energies of 9.88, 9.83, and 9.75 MeV. It has a half-life of 52 ms. In the recent syntheses of271Ds and271mDs, additional activities have been observed. A 0.94 ms activity emitting alpha particles with energy 9.83 MeV has been observed in addition to longer lived ~0.8 s and ~6.0 s activities. Currently, none of these are assigned and confirmed and further research is required to positively identify them.[25]

265Hs

The synthesis of265Hs has also provided evidence for two isomeric levels. The ground state decays by emission of an alpha particle with energy 10.30 MeV and has a half-life of 2.0 ms. The isomeric state has 300 keV of excess energy and decays by the emission of an alpha particle with energy 10.57 MeV and has a half-life of 0.75 ms.[15]

Future experiments

Scientists at the GSI are planning to search for isomers of270Hs using the reaction226Ra(48Ca,4n) in 2010 using the new TASCA facility at the GSI.[47] In addition, they also hope to study the spectroscopy of269Hs,265Sg and261Rf, using the reaction248Cm(26Mg,5n) or226Ra(48Ca,5n). This will allow them to determine the level structure in265Sg and261Rf and attempt to give spin and parity assignments to the various proposed isomers.[48]

Physical production yields

[edit]

The tables below provides cross-sections and excitation energies fornuclear reactions that produce isotopes of hassium directly. Data in bold represent maxima derived from excitation function measurements. + represents an observed exit channel.

Cold fusion

[edit]
ProjectileTargetCN1n2n3n
58Fe208Pb266Hs69 pb, 13.9 MeV4.5 pb
58Fe207Pb265Hs3.2 pb

Hot fusion

[edit]
ProjectileTargetCN3n4n5n
48Ca226Ra274Hs9.0 pb
36S238U274Hs0.8 pb
34S238U272Hs2.5 pb, 50.0 MeV
26Mg248Cm274Hs2.5 pb3.0 pb7.0 pb

Theoretical calculations

[edit]

Evaporation residue cross sections

[edit]

The below table contains various targets-projectile combinations for which calculations have provided estimates for cross section yields from various neutron evaporation channels. The channel with the highest expected yield is given.

DNS = Di-nuclear system; σ = cross section

TargetProjectileCNChannel (product)σmaxModelRef
136Xe136Xe272Hs1–4n (271–268Hs)10−6 pbDNS[49]
238U34S272Hs4n (268Hs)10 pbDNS[49]
238U36S274Hs4n (270Hs)42.97 pbDNS[50]
244Pu30Si274Hs4n (270Hs)185.1 pbDNS[50]
248Cm26Mg274Hs4n (270Hs)719.1 pbDNS[50]
250Cm26Mg276Hs4n (272Hs)185.2 pbDNS[50]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdeKondev, F. G.; Wang, M.; Huang, W. J.; Naimi, S.; Audi, G. (2021)."The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear properties"(PDF).Chinese Physics C.45 (3) 030001.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddae.
  2. ^"Radioactive Elements".Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights. 2018. Retrieved2020-09-20.
  3. ^Wang, Meng; Huang, W.J.; Kondev, F.G.; Audi, G.; Naimi, S. (2021). "The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references*".Chinese Physics C.45 (3) 030003.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf.
  4. ^abcdOganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V. K.; Shumeiko, M. V.; et al. (6 May 2024)."Synthesis and decay properties of isotopes of element 110: Ds 273 and Ds 275".Physical Review C.109 (5) 054307.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.109.054307.ISSN 2469-9985. Retrieved11 May 2024.
  5. ^abcOganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V. K.; Shumeiko, M. V.; et al. (2023). "New isotope276Ds and its decay products272Hs and268Sg from the232Th +48Ca reaction".Physical Review C.108 (24611) 024611.Bibcode:2023PhRvC.108b4611O.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024611.S2CID 261170871.
  6. ^Kovrizhnykh, N.D."On the way to the synthesis of new elements: 119 and 120"(PDF). Retrieved1 June 2025.
  7. ^Oganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V. K.; Ibadullayev, D.; et al. (2022). "Investigation of48Ca-induced reactions with242Pu and238U targets at the JINR Superheavy Element Factory".Physical Review C.106 (24612) 024612.Bibcode:2022PhRvC.106b4612O.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024612.OSTI 1883808.S2CID 251759318.
  8. ^Cox, D. M.; Såmark-Roth, A.; Rudolph, D.; Sarmiento, L. G.; Clark, R. M.; Egido, J. L.; Golubev, P.; Heery, J.; Yakushev, A.; Åberg, S.; Albers, H. M.; Albertsson, M.; Block, M.; Brand, H.; Calverley, T.; Cantemir, R.; Carlsson, B. G.; Düllmann, Ch. E.; Eberth, J.; Fahlander, C.; Forsberg, U.; Gates, J. M.; Giacoppo, F.; Götz, M.; Götz, S.; Herzberg, R.-D.; Hrabar, Y.; Jäger, E.; Judson, D.; Khuyagbaatar, J.; Kindler, B.; Kojouharov, I.; Kratz, J. V.; Krier, J.; Kurz, N.; Lens, L.; Ljungberg, J.; Lommel, B.; Louko, J.; Meyer, C.-C.; Mistry, A.; Mokry, C.; Papadakis, P.; Parr, E.; Pore, J. L.; Ragnarsson, I.; Runke, J.; Schädel, M.; Schaffner, H.; Schausten, B.; Shaughnessy, D. A.; Thörle-Pospiech, P.; Trautmann, N.; Uusitalo, J. (6 February 2023)."Spectroscopy along flerovium decay chains. II. Fine structure in odd-A 289Fl".Physical Review C.107 (2) L021301.Bibcode:2023PhRvC.107b1301C.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.L021301.
  9. ^"Archived copy"(PDF).www.nupecc.org. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 23 August 2007. Retrieved11 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  10. ^abArmbruster, Peter & Münzenberg, Gottfried (1989). "Creating superheavy elements".Scientific American.34:36–42.
  11. ^Barber, Robert C.; Gäggeler, Heinz W.; Karol, Paul J.; Nakahara, Hiromichi; Vardaci, Emanuele; Vogt, Erich (2009)."Discovery of the element with atomic number 112 (IUPAC Technical Report)".Pure and Applied Chemistry.81 (7): 1331.doi:10.1351/PAC-REP-08-03-05.
  12. ^Fleischmann, Martin; Pons, Stanley (1989). "Electrochemically induced nuclear fusion of deuterium".Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry.261 (2):301–308.doi:10.1016/0022-0728(89)80006-3.
  13. ^Oganessian, Yu Ts; Demin, A. G.; Hussonnois, M.; Tretyakova, S. P.; Kharitonov, Yu P.; Utyonkov, V. K.; Shirokovsky, I. V.; Constantinescu, O.; et al. (1984). "On the stability of the nuclei of element 108 with A=263–265".Zeitschrift für Physik A.319 (2):215–217.Bibcode:1984ZPhyA.319..215O.doi:10.1007/BF01415635.S2CID 123170572.
  14. ^abcdefBarber, R. C.; Greenwood, N. N.; Hrynkiewicz, A. Z.; Jeannin, Y. P.; Lefort, M.; Sakai, M.; Ulehla, I.; Wapstra, A. P.; Wilkinson, D. H. (1993)."Discovery of the transfermium elements. Part II: Introduction to discovery profiles. Part III: Discovery profiles of the transfermium elements (Note: for Part I see Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 879–886, 1991)".Pure and Applied Chemistry.65 (8): 1757.doi:10.1351/pac199365081757.S2CID 195819585.
  15. ^abMünzenberg, G.; Armbruster, P.; Folger, H.; Heßberger, F. P.; Hofmann, S.; Keller, J.; Poppensieker, K.; Reisdorf, W.; et al. (1984). "The identification of element 108".Zeitschrift für Physik A.317 (2):235–236.Bibcode:1984ZPhyA.317..235M.doi:10.1007/BF01421260.S2CID 123288075.
  16. ^Hofmann, S. (1998). "New elements – approaching".Reports on Progress in Physics.61 (6):639–689.Bibcode:1998RPPh...61..639H.doi:10.1088/0034-4885/61/6/002.S2CID 250756383.
  17. ^Hofmann, S.; Heßberger, F.P.; Ninov, V.; Armbruster, P.; Münzenberg, G.; Stodel, C.; Popeko, A.G.; Yeremin, A.V.; et al. (1997). "Excitation function for the production of 265 108 and 266 109".Zeitschrift für Physik A.358 (4):377–378.Bibcode:1997ZPhyA.358..377H.doi:10.1007/s002180050343.S2CID 124304673.
  18. ^Münzenberg, G.; Armbruster, P.; Berthes, G.; Folger, H.; Heßberger, F. P.; Hofmann, S.; Poppensieker, K.; Reisdorf, W.; et al. (1986). "Evidence for264108, the heaviest known even-even isotope".Zeitschrift für Physik A.324 (4):489–490.Bibcode:1986ZPhyA.324..489M.doi:10.1007/BF01290935.S2CID 121616566.
  19. ^Mendeleev Symposium. MoritaArchived September 27, 2011, at theWayback Machine
  20. ^Dragojević, I.; Gregorich, K.; Düllmann, Ch.; Dvorak, J.; Ellison, P.; Gates, J.; Nelson, S.; Stavsetra, L.; Nitsche, H. (2009). "New Isotope263108".Physical Review C.79 (1) 011602.Bibcode:2009PhRvC..79a1602D.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.011602.
  21. ^Kaji, Daiya; Morimoto, Kouji; Sato, Nozomi; Ichikawa, Takatoshi; Ideguchi, Eiji; Ozeki, Kazutaka; Haba, Hiromitsu; Koura, Hiroyuki; et al. (2009). "Production and Decay Properties of263108".Journal of the Physical Society of Japan.78 (3) 035003.Bibcode:2009JPSJ...78c5003K.doi:10.1143/JPSJ.78.035003.
  22. ^"Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions"(PDF).[page needed]
  23. ^Tsyganov, Yu.; Oganessian, Yu.; Utyonkov, V.; Lobanov, Yu.; Abdullin, F.; Shirokovsky, I.; Polyakov, A.; Subbotin, V.; Sukhov, A. (2009-04-07)."Results of226Ra+48Ca Experiment". Retrieved2012-12-25.[dead link]Alt URL
  24. ^Observation of270Hs in the complete fusion reaction36S+238U*Archived 2012-03-03 at theWayback Machine R. Graeger et al., GSI Report 2008
  25. ^abLazarev, Yu. A.; Lobanov, YV; Oganessian, YT; Tsyganov, YS; Utyonkov, VK; Abdullin, FS; Iliev, S; Polyakov, AN; et al. (1995)."New Nuclide267108 Produced by the238U +34S Reaction"(PDF).Physical Review Letters.75 (10):1903–1906.Bibcode:1995PhRvL..75.1903L.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1903.PMID 10059158.
  26. ^ab"Decay properties of269Hs and evidence for the new nuclide270Hs"Archived 2012-11-18 atWebCite, Turler et al.,GSI Annual Report 2001. Retrieved 2008-03-01.
  27. ^Dvorak, Jan (2006-09-25)."On the production and chemical separation of Hs (element 108)"(PDF).Technical University of Munich. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2009-02-25. Retrieved2012-12-23.
  28. ^"Doubly magic270Hs"Archived 2012-03-03 at theWayback Machine, Turler et al.,GSI report, 2006. Retrieved 2008-03-01.
  29. ^abSonzogni, Alejandro."Interactive Chart of Nuclides". National Nuclear Data Center: Brookhaven National Laboratory. Archived fromthe original on 2016-01-12. Retrieved2008-06-06.
  30. ^Ghiorso, A.; Lee, D.; Somerville, L.; Loveland, W.; Nitschke, J.; Ghiorso, W.; Seaborg, G.; Wilmarth, P.; et al. (1995). "Evidence for the possible synthesis of element 110 produced by the59Co+209Bi reaction".Physical Review C.51 (5):R2293 –R2297.Bibcode:1995PhRvC..51.2293G.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.51.R2293.PMID 9970386.
  31. ^Hofmann, S.; Ninov, V.; Heßberger, F. P.; Armbruster, P.; Folger, H.; Münzenberg, G.; Schött, H. J.; Popeko, A. G.; Yeremin, A. V.; Andreyev, A. N.; Saro, S.; Janik, R.; Leino, M. (1995). "Production and decay of269110".Zeitschrift für Physik A.350 (4):277–280.Bibcode:1995ZPhyA.350..277H.doi:10.1007/BF01291181.S2CID 125020220.
  32. ^Hofmann, S.; Heßberger, F. P.; Ackermann, D.; Antalic, S.; Cagarda, P.; Ćwiok, S.; Kindler, B.; Kojouharova, J.; Lommel, B.; Mann, R.; Münzenberg, G.; Popeko, A. G.; Saro, S.; Schött, H. J.; Yeremin, A. V. (2001)."The new isotope270110 and its decay products266Hs and262Sg"(PDF).The European Physical Journal A.10 (1):5–10.Bibcode:2001EPJA...10....5H.doi:10.1007/s100500170137.S2CID 124240926.
  33. ^Hofmann, S. (1998). "New elements – approaching".Reports on Progress in Physics.61 (6):639–689.Bibcode:1998RPPh...61..639H.doi:10.1088/0034-4885/61/6/002.S2CID 250756383.
  34. ^abHofmann, S.; et al. (1996). "The new element 112".Zeitschrift für Physik A.354 (1):229–230.Bibcode:1996ZPhyA.354..229H.doi:10.1007/BF02769517.S2CID 119975957.
  35. ^abPublic Affairs Department (26 October 2010)."Six New Isotopes of the Superheavy Elements Discovered: Moving Closer to Understanding the Island of Stability".Berkeley Lab. Retrieved2011-04-25.
  36. ^Yeremin, A. V.; Oganessian, Yu. Ts.; Popeko, A. G.; Bogomolov, S. L.; Buklanov, G. V.; Chelnokov, M. L.; Chepigin, V. I.; Gikal, B. N.; Gorshkov, V. A.; Gulbekian, G. G.; Itkis, M. G.; Kabachenko, A. P.; Lavrentev, A. Yu.; Malyshev, O. N.; Rohac, J.; Sagaidak, R. N.; Hofmann, S.; Saro, S.; Giardina, G.; Morita, K. (1999). "Synthesis of nuclei of the superheavy element 114 in reactions induced by48Ca".Nature.400 (6741):242–245.Bibcode:1999Natur.400..242O.doi:10.1038/22281.S2CID 4399615.
  37. ^ab"Element 114 – Heaviest Element at GSI Observed at TASCA". Archived fromthe original on February 11, 2013.
  38. ^Oganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V.; Lobanov, Yu.; Abdullin, F.; Polyakov, A.; Shirokovsky, I.; Tsyganov, Yu.; Gulbekian, G.; et al. (1999). "Synthesis of Superheavy Nuclei in the48Ca+244Pu Reaction".Physical Review Letters.83 (16):3154–3157.Bibcode:1999PhRvL..83.3154O.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3154.S2CID 109929705.
  39. ^abOganessian, Yu. Ts.; et al. (2004)."Measurements of cross sections for the fusion-evaporation reactions244Pu(48Ca,xn)292−x114 and245Cm(48Ca,xn)293−x116".Physical Review C.69 (5) 054607.Bibcode:2004PhRvC..69e4607O.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.69.054607.
  40. ^Yu. Ts. Oganessian; V. K. Utyonkov; Yu. V. Lobanov; F. Sh. Abdullin; A. N. Polyakov; I. V. Shirokovsky; Yu. S. Tsyganov; G. G. Gulbekian; S. L. Bogomolov; et al. (October 2000). "Synthesis of superheavy nuclei in48Ca+244Pu interactions".Nuclei Experiment: Physics of Atomic Nuclei.63 (10):1679–1687.Bibcode:2000PAN....63.1679O.doi:10.1134/1.1320137.S2CID 118044323.
  41. ^Ninov, V.; et al. (1999)."Observation of Superheavy Nuclei Produced in the Reaction of86
    Kr
    with208
    Pb
    "
    .Physical Review Letters.83 (6):1104–1107.Bibcode:1999PhRvL..83.1104N.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1104.
  42. ^Public Affairs Department (21 July 2001)."Results of element 118 experiment retracted".Berkeley Lab. Archived fromthe original on 29 January 2008. Retrieved2008-01-18.
  43. ^George Johnson (15 October 2002)."At Lawrence Berkeley, Physicists Say a Colleague Took Them for a Ride".The New York Times.
  44. ^Robert Smolanczuk (1997). "Properties of the hypothetical spherical superheavy nuclei".Physical Review C.56 (2):812–824.Bibcode:1997PhRvC..56..812S.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.56.812.
  45. ^Oganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V. K.; Lobanov, Yu. V.; Abdullin, F. Sh.; Polyakov, A. N.; Shirokovsky, I. V.; Tsyganov, Yu. S.; Gulbekian, G. G.; et al. (2000). "Synthesis of superheavy nuclei in 48Ca+244Pu interactions".Physics of Atomic Nuclei.63 (10):1679–1687.Bibcode:2000PAN....63.1679O.doi:10.1134/1.1320137.S2CID 118044323.
  46. ^Hofmann, S.; Heinz, S.; Mann, R.; Maurer, J.; Münzenberg, G.; Antalic, S.; Barth, W.; Burkhard, H. G.; Dahl, L.; Eberhardt, K.; Grzywacz, R.; Hamilton, J. H.; Henderson, R. A.; Kenneally, J. M.; Kindler, B.; Kojouharov, I.; Lang, R.; Lommel, B.; Miernik, K.; Miller, D.; Moody, K. J.; Morita, K.; Nishio, K.; Popeko, A. G.; Roberto, J. B.; Runke, J.; Rykaczewski, K. P.; Saro, S.; Scheidenberger, C.; Schött, H. J.; Shaughnessy, D. A.; Stoyer, M. A.; Thörle-Popiesch, P.; Tinschert, K.; Trautmann, N.; Uusitalo, J.; Yeremin, A. V. (2016)."Review of even element super-heavy nuclei and search for element 120".The European Physical Journal A.2016 (52): 180.Bibcode:2016EPJA...52..180H.doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16180-4.OSTI 1410078.S2CID 124362890.
  47. ^"TASCA in Small Image Mode Spectroscopy"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on March 5, 2012.
  48. ^Hassium spectroscopy experiments at TASCA, A. YakushevArchived March 5, 2012, at theWayback Machine
  49. ^abInfluence of entrance channels on formation of superheavy nuclei in massive fusion reactions, Zhao-Qing Feng, Jun-Qing Li, Gen-Ming Jin, April 2009
  50. ^abcdFeng, Z.; Jin, G.; Li, J. (2009). "Production of new superheavy Z=108–114 nuclei with238U,244Pu and248,250Cm targets".Physical Review C.80 057601.arXiv:0912.4069.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.80.057601.S2CID 118733755.

Half-life, spin, and isomer data selected from:

Group12 3456789101112131415161718
PeriodHydrogen and
alkali metals
Alkaline
earth metals
Pnicto­gensChal­co­gensHalo­gensNoble gases
12
345678910
1112131415161718
192021222324252627282930313233343536
373839404142434445464748495051525354
55561 asterisk71727374757677787980818283848586
87881 asterisk103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118
119120
1 asterisk5758596061626364656667686970 
1 asterisk8990919293949596979899100101102
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isotopes_of_hassium&oldid=1322559544"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp