| Isaac I Komnenos | |
|---|---|
| Emperor and Autocrat of the Romans | |
.png) Goldtetarteron of Isaac I Komnenos, showing the Emperor wielding aglobus cruciger and holding a sheathed sword | |
| Byzantine emperor | |
| Reign | 8 June 1057 – 22 November 1059 |
| Coronation | 1 September 1057 |
| Predecessor | Michael VI |
| Successor | Constantine X |
| Born | c. 1007 |
| Died | 1 June 1060 (aged 53) Monastery of Stoudios,Constantinople (nowIstanbul,Turkey) |
| Spouse | Catherine of Bulgaria |
| Issue | Manuel Komnenos Maria Komnene |
| Dynasty | Komnenian |
| Father | Manuel Erotikos Komnenos |
| Mother | Maria? |
Isaac I Komnenos orComnenus (Ancient Greek:Ἰσαάκιος Κομνηνός,romanized: Isaákios Komnēnós;c. 1007 – 1 June 1060) wasByzantine emperor from 1057 to 1059, the first reigning member of theKomnenian dynasty.
The son of the generalManuel Erotikos Komnenos, he was orphaned at an early age, and was raised under the care of EmperorBasil II. He made his name as a successful military commander, serving as commander-in-chief of the eastern armies betweenc. 1042 and 1054. In 1057 he became the head of a conspiracy of the dissatisfied eastern generals against the newly crownedMichael VI Bringas. Proclaimed emperor by his followers on 8 June 1057, he rallied sufficient military forces to defeat the loyalist army at theBattle of Hades. While Isaac was willing to accept a compromise solution by being appointed Michael's heir, a powerful faction inConstantinople, led by the ambitiousPatriarch of Constantinople,Michael Keroularios, pressured Michael to abdicate. After Michael abdicated on 30 August 1057, Isaac was crowned emperor in theHagia Sophia on 1 September.
As emperor, he rewarded his supporters, but also embarked on a series of fiscal measures designed to shore up revenue and eliminate the excesses allowed to flourish under his predecessors. His aim was to fill the treasury and restore theByzantine army's effectiveness to preserve the empire. The reduction of salaries, harsh tax measures and confiscation of Church properties aroused much opposition, particularly from Patriarch Keroularios, who had come to think of himself as a king-maker. In November 1058, Keroularios was arrested and exiled, and died before asynod to depose him could be convened.
The eastern frontier held firm during Isaac's reign,Hungarian raids were resolved by a treaty in 1059, while the restivePechenegs were subdued by Isaac in person in summer 1059. Shortly after, Isaac fell ill, and on the advice and pressure ofMichael Psellos, he abdicated his throne in favour ofConstantine X Doukas, retiring to theStoudion monastery where he died later in 1060.
Isaac was the son ofManuel Erotikos Komnenos, who reportedly served asstrategos autokrator of the East under EmperorBasil II and defendedNicaea against the rebelBardas Skleros in 978.[1][2] His mother's name was Maria, about whom nothing else is known.[3] Manuel's native language wasGreek and modern scholarship considers the family to have been ofGreek origin.[4] It is said that the family name was derived from the city of Komne, nearPhilippopolis in Thrace.[1] Isaac was bornc. 1007.[5]
As Maria had died early, on his deathbed in 1020, Isaac's father commended his two surviving sons Isaac andJohn to the care of Emperor Basil II. According toNikephoros Bryennios the Younger, the two children were raised with the utmost solicitude and the best tutors at theStoudion monastery, with care taken to teach them military exercises and hunting.[6] As soon as they came of age, Isaac and his brother joined the imperial bodyguard, theHetaireia.[7]
At a young age, perhaps as early as 1025, Isaac marriedCatherine of Bulgaria (bornc. 1010), a daughter ofIvan Vladislav (r. 1015–1018), the last Tsar of theFirst Bulgarian Empire.[5][8] Fromc. 1042 he held the post ofstratopedarches of the East—likely denoting that he wasdomestikos ton scholon, commander-in-chief, of the eastern field army, but this title is not explicitly attested[9]—and the ranks ofmagistros andvestes.[5] He was dismissed by EmpressTheodora in 1054,[5] and replaced by hereunuch confidant, theproedros Theodore.[10]
WhenMichael VI Bringas came to the throne in 1056, Isaac was chosen to lead a deputation of eastern generals to the new emperor. Michael VI engaged in mass promotions of individuals—in the eyes of the contemporary courtierMichael Psellos, to an excessive degree—and the military sought to partake in the emperor's bounty.[11][12] This was not a trivial matter: thedebasement of theByzantine currency underConstantine IX Monomachos (r. 1042–1054) had affected military pay—not coincidentally presided over by none other than Michael Bringas, who was thenmilitary logothete—and while civil officials were compensated by being raised to higher dignities (which commanded higher salaries,rogai), the army was not.[13] This exacerbated the already simmering dislike of the military aristocracy for the "regime of eunuchs and civilian politicians" that had dominated the empire during the last decades of theMacedonian dynasty.[14]
At Easter 1057, the traditional time when the emperor paid title holders their stipends, the delegation presented itself before the emperor. Along with Isaac, the delegation included themagistrosKatakalon Kekaumenos, who had just been dismissed asdoux ofAntioch; thevestarches Michael Bourtzes, whosenamesake grandfather hadcaptured Antioch for Byzantium a century earlier;Constantine Doukas, married to a niece of thePatriarch of ConstantinopleMichael Keroularios; his brotherJohn Doukas, a friend of Psellos; and others not explicitly named.[15][16] As the historian Anthony Kaldellis comments, this was a formidable assemblage, as the families represented in it, all of them descended from military men promoted by the warrior-emperorBasil II, would define "the future of the empire for the next thirty years, indeed for the next century and more".[14]
Psellos himself was an eyewitness at the reception of the generals' delegation, and claims that the emperor began abusing them at once; he then made Isaac, as the leader of the deputation, and his second, Kekaumenos, stand forth, and proceeded to denounce him, claiming that he was responsible for "all but losing Antioch" and "corrupting his army", being a coward and incompetent, and of having misappropriated army funds for his own use.John Skylitzes, who wrote later in the century, reports that the emperor treated the generals courteously, but agrees that he refused outright to consider the honours they claimed for themselves, notably the promotion of Isaac and Kekaumenos to the rank ofproedros.[15][12]
The effect of the emperor's attitude on the army leadership was profound, and turned them against Michael. A second delegation to the chief minister, theprotosynkellosLeo Paraspondylos, was received in similar manner, and according to Psellos Isaac could barely restrain his colleagues from attacking the emperor then and there, in his own throne room. At length, a plot was formed against the emperor, and despite Isaac's own reluctance, according to Psellos, he was nominated as its leader.[17][18]
The conspirators contacted the veteran generalNikephoros Bryennios, who had unsuccessfully tried to usurp the throne from Theodora[19] but had recently been recalled by Michael VI as commander of theMacedonian army, and he apparently agreed to support them. Soon after, however, Bryennios left with his troops for Asia Minor, to campaign against the Turks. Once in theAnatolic Theme he quarreled with the army treasurer, threw him in prison, and appropriated the funds to pay his soldiers as he saw fit. This was seen by another local commander as a sign of rebellion; Bryennios was arrested andblinded.[18][20]
Fearing that their plot was about to be discovered, the eastern generals hastened to act: the conspirators resident in the Anatolic Theme,Romanos Skleros, Michael Bourtzes,Nikephoros Botaneiates and the sons ofBasil Argyros, hastened to find Isaac Komnenos at his estates nearKastamon inPaphlagonia, and on 8 June 1057, at a place called Gounaria, proclaimed him emperor.[21] It is unclear whether any of the rebels held command of troops; rather, according to Kaldellis, "they had to canvass for support among the officers and soldiers and forge orders of imperial appointment for themselves".[22] Thus Skylitzes reports that Kekaumenos had to forge imperial letters to mobilize the regiments of theArmeniac Theme. With this force he went to join Komnenos.[23] Leaving his family for safety with his brother at the fortress of Pemolissa on the banks of theHalys River, Komnenos advanced west towardsConstantinople.[24]
At the same time, the western regiments, and some of the eastern ones too, remained loyal to Michael VI. The emperor placed them under the command of Theodora's eunuch favourite, theproedros Theodore, andAaron, Isaac's brother-in-law; unlike previously, he now showered his commanders with honours to secure their allegiance. The loyalist army assembled atNicomedia, controlling the direct route to the capital. Therefore Komnenos turned south and seizedNicaea as his base of operations.[22][25]
The two armies met at theBattle of Hades, near Nicaea. In a hard-fought battle with many casualties, the loyalist left defeated the right wing of the rebel army. On the other flank, Kekaumenos broke through the loyalists to capture their camp and decide the battle, while Isaac held the centre.[26][27][28]
Michael VI then attempted to negotiate with the rebels, sending Psellos, Leo Alopos, and the formermesazon of Constantine IX,Constantine Leichoudes, to Isaac's camp. Michael offered to adopt Isaac as his son and to grant him the title ofCaesar, making him effectively his successor, but this was rejected in a public audience. Psellos claims that Isaac was inclined to accept, but the pressure of the assembled troops, who vocally refused it, forced him to agree with his supporters. At a private meeting afterwards Isaac insisted that he had accepted the title of emperor only under the pressure of his followers, and secretly accepted the offer provided that Michael would also share "some, at any rate, of his imperial power", so that he could make appointments and reward his followers, especially in the military.[22][29]
The envoys returned to Constantinople, and rapidly secured Michael's consent to the proposal; the Emperor explicitly agreed to pardon Isaac's followers, and to accord Isaac additional honours above those ofCaesar, setting him up almost as a co-emperor (symbasileus). As a sign of good faith, furthermore, Paraspondylos was dismissed from office. When the envoys returned to Isaac with this news, he publicly accepted the proposal and prepared to enter the capital.[30]
Back in Constantinople, however, a crowd of officials assembled in theHagia Sophia and began protesting that by making a deal, the Emperor was forcing them to renounce their oaths to oppose the rebels. Going a step further, they began themselves acclaiming Isaac as emperor. After a short while, on 30 August, Michael Keroularios and the clergy joined their cause, raising suspicions that this "spontaneous" assembly had been planned by the ambitious and wily Patriarch all along. Pressured by Keroularios and wanting to avoid bloodshed in the city, Michael agreed to abdicate. He was quicklytonsured and retired to a monastery.[31][32][33] On the next day, 31 August, Isaac and his entourage crossed theBosporus into Constantinople and entered the palace; on 1 September, he was crowned emperor by the Patriarch in the Hagia Sophia.[34]
The first act of the new emperor was to reward his partisans: his fellow conspirators were named to high offices—his own brother John was nameddomestikos ton scholon of the West and received the high title ofkouropalates, which was also awarded to Kekaumenos and Bryennios.[35][36] The troops that had followed him received adonative and were quickly sent back east, to avoid any trouble with the populace of Constantinople.[37][38] Patriarch Michael Keroularios was also rewarded for his support, by receiving sole authority for all personnel and financial matters of the Church, which were previously under the purview of the emperor, while the Patriarch's nephews received high court titles.[37][39]
Isaac's rise to power was a turning point in Byzantine history, marking the definitive end of the long-lived Macedonian dynasty. Although powerful generals had previously suborned power, they had ruled alongside the Macedonian emperors; Isaac was the first military strongman to usurp power outright since the 9th century.[41] This was reflected in the coinage struck in his name, which uniquely showed him holding a drawn sword; while it may have simply indicated his intention to restore "capable military rule" (Kaldellis), it came to be understood as a claim to rule by right of conquest. Certainly it highlighted Isaac's determination to make reforms and restore the effectiveness of the army.[38]
The task he faced was truly herculean, as the politically weak emperors of the previous thirty years had fostered corruption and inefficiency, handing out titles and their attendant state salaries (rogai) in exchange for support.[38][37] The devaluation of the coinage under Constantine IX had been a first reaction to the brewing crisis, but Isaac was the first emperor in this period who certainly faced a budget deficit.[37] To fund his cherished army, Isaac was therefore obliged to begin strict economies: he reduced or abolished therogai of those who had been awarded titles, enforced a stricter and more efficient collection of taxes, reclaimed misappropriated imperial estates, and cancelled grants of such lands and tax exemptions made under Constantine IX and Michael VI, particularly those that had been granted to monasteries and churches, using a law ofNikephoros II Phokas.[38][42] Even though salaries of officials, especially members of theSenate, were cut,[8] Isaac's efforts were enthusiastically received even among some senior members of the civil bureaucracy, judging by the comments of Psellos andMichael Attaleiates.[42]
[Isaac Komnenos] was eager to lose no time in cutting out the dead wood which had long been accumulating in the Roman Empire. We can liken it to a monstrous body, a body with a multitude of heads, an ugly bull-neck, hands so many that they were beyond counting, and just as many feet; its entrails were festering and diseased, in some parts swollen, in others wasting away, here afflicted with dropsy, there diminishing with consumption. Now Isaac tried to remedy this by wholesale surgery.
— Michael Psellos,Chronographia, VII.51[43]
The only point of criticism raised by Psellos is his haste and severity, judging that by a more gradual and judicious, step by step approach, he would have reaped greater success with far less opposition.[8][44] Thus his appropriation of Church lands provoked the reaction of Michael Keroularios, with whom Isaac's relations had been steadily deteriorating. The Patriarch's role in Isaac's accession and his extensive new powers over the Church quickly went to his head. He is said to have admonished and berated the emperor, even going as far as threatening to destroy him "like an oven he had made".[45][46] He is also alleged to have wornimperial purple boots, a privilege restricted to the emperor, and which may indicate, according to Kaldellis, that Keroularios was influenced byPapal theories and conceived of the secular and clerical powers as co-equal, a traditional Byzantine approach known as asymphonia.[45]
Finally, on 8 November 1058, while Keroularios was visiting a church outside thecity walls, and hence was away from his supporters in the urban mob, Isaac sent theVarangian Guard to arrest him and take him toProkonnesos, where he was placed under house arrest. Isaac applied considerable pressure on Keroularios to resign, but the latter steadfastly refused. In the end, the emperor decided to convene asynod against the Patriarch. This too was to take place away from the capital, somewhere inThrace, with Psellos, who had himself been earlier persecuted by Keroularios, as the chief accuser. In the event, Keroularios died on 21 January 1059, before the synod could take place. Isaac appointed the bureaucrat Constantine Leichoudes as the new patriarch.[45][46]
The rebellion and civil war that brought Isaac to the throne had concentrated Byzantium's military might away from its borders. The contemporaryArmenian historianAristakes Lastivertsi reports that theGeorgian lordIvane took advantage of this opportunity to capture two Byzantine frontier forts as well as an imperial tax collector, and lay siege toTheodosiopolis. The Byzantinedoux atAni drove him off, but Ivane then called upon some Turks for assistance. About a month after Isaac's coronation, these raiders reachedMelitene, whose inhabitants were allowed to depart before the city was plundered by the Turks. Local Byzantine troops managed to blockade the mountain passes, forcing the raiders to winter in the region ofChorzane. In spring 1058, the Turks were ambushed and defeated while they attacked the fort of Mormrans, leaving most of their captives behind. At about the same time or shortly after, another Turkish raid intoTaron was heavily defeated by the Byzantine defenders. Melitene was repaired and refortified, and made the seat of adoux.[47]
Constantine IX had famously abolished the military obligations of the Armenianthematic troops in exchange for cash payments, a step widely regarded, both by contemporaries and modern historians, as having catastrophic consequences for Byzantium's eastern defences, especially against themounting Turkish threat. The Turks had takenVaspurakan during theregency following Constantine's death, exposing the Anatolian interior to their raids.[48] While Isaac does not appear to have acted to restore the thematic armies,[38] according to Kaldellis, the reaction of the local forces to these events does not appear to indicate a degradation of Byzantium's defensive abilities in the East, but rather the continued and successful application of old-established counter-raiding principles as codified in Nikephoros Phokas'De velitatione bellica a century earlier.[47]
Isaac led only one military expedition, in late summer of 1059, into the Balkan provinces that had been suffering raids by theHungarians and thePechenegs. The details of the campaign are obscure, but the two had possibly entered into an alliance. AtSerdica, the emperor made a treaty with the Hungarians—who appear to have kept the fortress town ofSirmium—before moving against the Pechenegs in the area ofMoesia. Most of the Pechenegs submitted again to imperial authority. The only major combat was against the fortified stronghold of a certain Selte, a recalcitrant Pecheneg leader.[38][49]
On its return march the army was caught in a sudden storm on 24 September. Many men and supplies were lost, while Isaac barely escaped death when a tree struck by lightning fell next to him.[38][49] This was followed by the false rumour that a tax assessor in the eastern provinces was plotting rebellion, and Isaac hastened back to the capital.[50] Despite these events, Psellos claims that at this point Isaac's character changed markedly, and that he became "more haughty to such an extent that he held everyone else in contempt", including his own brother.[51]
Isaac was a passionate hunter with both the horse and the falcon, spending much time at a hunting lodge outside Constantinople.[52] On a hunt he fell ill. As the fever lasted for several days, Isaac, fearing he would die soon, named Constantine Doukas as his successor on 22 November 1059,[b] and agreed to resign and retire to a monastery. Psellos claims that he was the main author of this nomination, even against the initial opposition of Empress Catherine.[50][53][54]
According to Psellos, Isaac began to recover soon after Doukas' nomination, and started reconsidering his decision. Psellos again took the decisive step of having Doukas publicly acclaimed as emperor on 23 November, with Psellos putting the purple sandals on his feet. Isaac then resigned himself to his fate, and wastonsured as a monk, retiring to the Stoudion monastery.[50][55] Psellos' prominent role in these events may simply be exaggeration and self-promotion, especially as he was writing this part of his history during the reign of Constantine Doukas and his sonMichael VII Doukas (r. 1071–1078). No contemporary or later source, not even during theKomnenian dynasty (1081–1180), described or implied a coup by Doukas and his supporters, and the legality of the transition was never questioned.[50]
Empress Catherine remained at the palace, and was even allowed to be mentioned first in the imperial acclamations, with Doukas coming second. This joint reign lasted for a brief while, before she too retired to theMyrelaion monastery under themonastic name of Xene.[56] Isaac lived the remainder of his life as a simple monk in Stoudion, readily performing menial tasks until he died in 1060,[57] probably on 1 June.[58]
Isaac was married toCatherine of Bulgaria, a daughter ofIvan Vladislav, the last ruler of the First Bulgarian Empire.[8] Isaac raised her to the position ofAugusta.[59] The couple had at least two children:[60]
Isaac I Komnenos Born:c. 1007 Died: 1060 | ||
| Regnal titles | ||
|---|---|---|
| Preceded by | Byzantine emperor 1057–1059 | Succeeded by |
