 | |
| Founded | August 11, 1937; 88 years ago (1937-08-11) |
|---|---|
| Legal status | 501(c)(5)labor organization[2] |
| Headquarters | San Francisco,California, US[2] |
| Membership | 29,056[1] (2020) |
President | Willie Adams |
| Subsidiaries | International Longshore & Warehouse, Pacific Longshoremen's Memorial Association[2] |
| Affiliations | |
| Revenue | $7,380,493[2] (2014) |
| Expenses | $5,980,052[2] (2014) |
| Employees | 33[2] (2014) |
| Website | ilwu |
TheInternational Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) is alabor union which primarily representsdock workers on theWest Coast of theUnited States,Hawaii, and inBritish Columbia,Canada; on the East Coast, the dominant union is theInternational Longshoremen's Association. The union was established in 1937 after the1934 West Coast Waterfront Strike, a three-month-long strike that culminated in a four-daygeneral strike inSan Francisco,California, and the Bay Area. It disaffiliated from theAFL–CIO on August 30, 2013.
The union, which still useshiring halls, has a single labor contract with thePacific Maritime Association which covers all 29seaports on the west coast of the US, fromBellingham, Washington, toSan Diego; its 15,000 dockworkers were paid an average of $171,000 in 2019.[3][4] The union has been described as "the aristocrat of theworking class" and their members "lords of the docks" for their high pay and power over a choke point of the global economy.[3][5]
Longshoremen on the West Coast ports had either been unorganized or represented by company unions since the years immediately after World War I, when the shipping companies and stevedoring firms had imposed the open shop after a series of failed strikes. Longshoremen in San Francisco, then the major port on the coast, were required to go through a hiring hall operated by a company union, known as the "blue book" system for the color of the union's membership book.
TheIndustrial Workers of the World had attempted to organize longshoremen, sailors and fishermen in the 1920s. A number of former IWW members and other militants, such asHarry Bridges, an Australian-born sailor who became alongshoreman after coming to the United States, soon joined theInternational Longshoremen's Association, when passage of theNational Industrial Recovery Act in 1933 led to an explosion in union membership in the ILA among West Coast longshoremen.
Those activists, known as the "Albion Hall group" after their usual meeting place inSan Francisco, made contacts with like-minded activists at other ports. They pressed demands for a coastwide contract, a union-run hiring hall and an industrywide waterfront federation and led the membership in rejecting the weak "gentlemen's agreement" that the conservative ILA leadership had negotiated with the employers. When the employers offered to arbitrate, but only on the condition that the union agree to theopen shop, the union struck every West Coast port on May 9, 1934.
The strike was a violent one: When strikers attacked the stockade in which the employers were housingstrikebreakers inSan Pedro, California, on May 15, the employers' private guards shot and killed two strikers. Similar battles broke out in San Francisco andOakland, California,Portland, Oregon, andSeattle, Washington. When the employers made a show of force in order to reopen the port in San Francisco, a pitched battle broke out on theEmbarcadero in San Francisco between police and strikers. Two strikers were killed on July 5 by a policeman's shotgun blast into a crowd of picketers and onlookers. This incident is known asBloody Thursday and is commemorated every year by ILWU members.
When the National Guard moved in to patrol the waterfront, the picketers pulled back. The San Francisco andAlameda County Central Labor Councils voted to call a general strike in support of the longshoremen, shutting down much of San Francisco and the Bay Area for four days, ending with the union's agreement to arbitrate the remaining issues in dispute.
The union won most of its demands in that arbitration proceeding. Those it did not win outright it gained through hundreds of job actions after the strikers returned to work, as the union gradually wrested control over the pace of work and the employer's power to hire and fire from the shipping and stevedoring companies through the mechanism ofhiring halls.[6][7] Union members also engaged in a number of sympathy strikes in support of other maritime unions' demands.
The ILWU admitted African Americans in the 1930s, and during World War II its San Francisco section alone had an estimated 800 black members, at a time when most San Francisco unions excluded black workers and resisted implementation of President Roosevelt'sExecutive Order 8802 (1941) against racial discrimination in the US defense industry.[8] However, "black union members were a minuscule group within the ILWU [leadership] hierarchy", with the few exceptions concentrated in the Oakland locale, which had an even larger black membership than San Francisco.[8] Also, by the own admission of Richard Lynden, the San Francisco locale's president, the ILWU failed to work on the upgrading (promotion) of its black members.[8] Still, in the judgement of historian Albert S. Broussard, "as far as blacks were concerned, the ILWU stood head and shoulders above other Bay Area locals in virtually every respect" during World War II.[8] As the union extended membership to more and more workers during the war, it would experience incredible growth. Counting roughly 25,000 dues paying members at its inception, the union's rolls expanded to over 65,000 at the end of World War II due to a boost in wartime production and a successful campaign to organize warehouse workers away from the ports.[9]
Expulsion had no real effect, however, on either the ILWU or Bridges' power within it. The organization continued to negotiate agreements, with less strife than in the 1930s and 1940s, and Bridges continued to be reelected without serious opposition. The International Fishermen and Allied Workers of America joined with the union in the 1950s. The union negotiated a groundbreaking agreement in 1960 that permitted the extensive mechanization of the docks, significantly reducing the number of longshore workers in return for generous job guarantees and benefits for those displaced by the changes.
The agreement, however, highlighted the lesser status that less senior members, known as "B-men", enjoyed. Bridges reacted uncharacteristically defensively to these workers' complaints, which were given additional sting by the fact that many of the "B-men" were black. The additional longshore work produced by the Vietnam War allowed Bridges to meet the challenge by opening up more jobs and making determined efforts to recruit black applicants. The ILWU later faced similar challenges from women, who found it even harder to enter the industry and the union.
Bridges had difficulty giving up his position in the ILWU, even though he explored the possibility of merging it with the ILA or the Teamsters in the early 1970s. He finally retired in 1977, but only after ensuring that Louis Goldblatt, the long-time Secretary-Treasurer of the union and his logical successor, was denied the opportunity to replace him.
The Inlandboatmen's Union, whose members operate tugs, barges, passenger ferries and other vessels on the West Coast, and who had formerly been part of theSeafarers International Union of North America, merged with the ILWU in 1980. The ILWU rejoined the AFL–CIO in 1988, and disaffiliated with it in 2013.[10]
The ILWU disaffiliated from the AFL–CIO on August 30, 2013, accusing the AFL–CIO of unwillingness to punish other unions when their members crossed ILWU picket lines and over federal legislative policy issues.[11]
The ILWU Coast Longshore Division (CLD) is the division of the union that represents (as of 2024) more than 20,000 dockworkers along the West Coast, formed in 1952 as the ILWU was expanding fromlongshoring to other industries.[12]
 | This graph was using thelegacy Graph extension, which is no longer supported. It needs to be converted to thenew Chart extension. |
| This graph was using thelegacy Graph extension, which is no longer supported. It needs to be converted to thenew Chart extension. |
The ILWU was accused of engaging in a slowdown of work on docks in 2002, as an alternative to a strike, to support its contract demands in negotiations with thePacific Maritime Association. The union has documented that productivity was in fact stable at that time, while the employer claims to have contradictory data. The employers responded to the slowdown with alockout, disallowing the workers to do their jobs. TheBush administration sought a national emergency injunction under theTaft–Hartley Act against both the employers and the union, and threatened to move longshore workers from coverage under theNational Labor Relations Act to coverage under theRailway Labor Act, which would effectively prevent longshore workers from striking. (This is a long-time goal of the PMA and other companies whose workers the ILWU represents.[14])
The Longshore Contract that resulted from 2002 negotiations expired on July 1, 2008. The ILWU and thePMA reached a tentative agreement for a new six-year Longshore Contract in July 2008. In the following weeks, the ILWU membership voted to approve the new contract.
In protest of theIraq War, the ILWU encouraged longshore workers to "shut down all West Coast ports" by walking off the job on May 1, 2008, to "makeMay Day a 'No Peace, No Work' holiday." On May 1, more than 10,000 ILWU members from all 29 West Coast ports voluntarily stopped work, with some attending rallies held by the ILWU where the union called for working-class people to withhold their labor to protest the war. The employer, thePacific Maritime Association, filed a complaint against the Union for conducting what it saw as an illegal work stoppage. The court agreed with the PMA and determined that the ILWU had conducted a "secondary boycott" against the PMA, which is illegal under theNational Labor Relations Act of 1935.[15]
In August 2013, the ILWU disaffiliated from theAmerican Federation of Labor - Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO). The ILWU said that members of other AFL–CIO unions were crossing its picket lines, and the AFL–CIO had done nothing to stop it. The ILWU also cited the AFL–CIO's willingness to compromise on key policies such as labor law reform, immigration reform, and health care reform. The longshoremen's union said it would become an independent union.[16]
In August 2014, the Israeli-owned ZIMPiraeus was the subject of a major demonstration at thePort of Oakland instigated by the Arab Resource and Organizing Center (AROC). Approximately 500 protesters opposed to Israeli military actions in theGaza Strip participated.[17] The AROC claimed to have been supported by ILWU dockworkers who refused to unload the ship's cargo, stating that "Workers honored our picket and stood on the side of justice." However, the union denied this saying it had taken no position on the conflict in Gaza "but in cases when unsafe circumstances arise ... the union must protect the safety of its members in the workplace." An ILWU spokesman said workers were not prepared to become involved because of safety issues related to the size of the demonstration and the heavy police presence. However, several news reports and blogs claimed that some members from ILWU Locals 34 and 10 openly supported the protesters. On August 21, thePiraeus docked at a different terminal, where two dozen longshoremen unloaded the cargo overnight.[18][19]
After expiration of its contract with thePacific Maritime Association July 1, 2014,[7] months-long contract negotiations with the Pacific Maritime Association were characterized by backups in West Coast ports and mutual accusations of aslowdown. Base pay was about $35 an hour.[20] In Southern California, the lockout slowdown caused more than twenty-five cargo ships to idle off the coast, affecting over 700mariners, primarilyOverseas Filipinos.[21]
In 2014, when the Pacific Maritime Association reported that the nationwide average ILWU union member earned $147,000, theSeattle Times found that in 2013 "longshore employees" earned an average of $85,000 inSeattle and $114,000 inTacoma, while "clerks" earned an average of $153,000 in Seattle and $159,000 in Tacoma, and "foremen" in Seattle and Tacoma averaged $204,000.[22] The union stated that this average pay does not include "casual" (part-time) workers, who are not union members and earn a minimum of $26 per hour.[22]
In November 2019, a terminal operations company,International Container Terminal Services Oregon, won a $94 million jury trial verdict against ILWU for unlawful labor practices including "work stoppages, slowdowns, ‘safety gimmicks’ and other coercive actions" which occurred between August 2013 and March 2017 at thePort of Portland (Oregon) terminal, and resulted in all shippers ceasing to use the terminal.[4][23][24] In March 2020, the judge reduced the amount to $19 million.[24] ICTS declined the reduced award, and opted to continue litigating its claims of $42 - $142 million in a trial scheduled for February 2024.[25]
ILWU members stood by in memorial for8 min 46 seconds on June 9 toprotest the murder of George Floyd and for 8 hours onJuneteenth at all 29 of the U.S.'s Pacific Coast ports in solidarity with the protests sweeping the nation.[26]
In response to the2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, ILWU said that their members will not load or unload any Russian cargo in 29 ports across the United States.[27] The president said that "With this action in solidarity with the people of Ukraine, we send a message that we unequivocally condemn the Russian invasion."[28] The ILWU was part of the global industrial boycott of port and maritime workers against Russian-flagged ships and cargo.[29]
From July 1 to July 13, workers went on strike freezing the movement of billions of dollars' worth of cargo at Canada's busiest ports. The union rejected a number of offers before voting to ratify the new deal in August.[30][31] The union priorities were to addressinflation and wages,job automation and port automation and contracting out work.[32] Federallabour ministerSeamus O'Regan stated all options were available, leaving the possibility forback-to-work legislation, but it was ultimately not needed to resolve the dispute.[33][34]
On October 1, 2023, the ILWU filed forChapter 11 bankruptcy, stating it can no longer afford to keep fighting claims byICTSI concerning the amount of its liability for its 2012 illegal work stoppages at the Port of Portland.[25]
But the port workers — who still queue up at hiring halls daily for work and spend years earning full membership — stand guard over a crucial chokepoint in the global economy. For decades these "lords of the docks" have been paid like blue-collar royalty. ... The first was negotiating a single contract covering every port from San Diego to Bellingham, Wash. That prevents shippers from playing one West Coast port against another, as sometimes happens on the East Coast, said Peter Olney, a former organizing director at ILWU.
In 2017, ICTSI Oregon paid $20 million to exit its 25-year lease to operate the terminal, an expense included in the $135 million in damages the company sought from the union. ... The jury took just 3 1/2 hours to return the verdict and $94-million award, with the ILWU liable for 55% of the damages and Portland Local 8 the other 45%. The union has about $20 million in assets, and Local 8 has $150,000, according to federal filings. Longshore workers at a recent caucus meeting in San Francisco reportedly preferred bankruptcy to assessing members.
The longshore union has become the aristocrat of the working class; a top member can earn over well over $100,000 a year with excellent benefits. The jobs are so good that it's almost as tough to get in the ILWU as it is to get into Stanford; thousands apply for vacancies, sometimes tens of thousands. "These are dream blue-collar jobs," said Craig Merrilees, the union's communications director.
The jury found the International Longshore and Warehouse Union and Local 8, the Portland chapter, engaged in unlawful labor practices at times between Aug. 14, 2013 and March 31, 2017. The jury also found those labor practices were a major factor in causing damages to ICTSI.
A federal judge has ruled that the union owes ICTSI "the lost profits, lower operating costs, or both that would be reasonably anticipated 'but for' ILWU's unlawful labor practices." In court papers filed Friday, ICTSI placed its damages at between $42 million and $142 million, which the union disputes.
The date is known as "Juneteenth" and saw 29 ports shut down for eight hours as the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) pledged support for all those fighting structural racism and inequality. It followed a previous stoppage on June 9 when union members downed tools for eight minutes and 46 seconds in silent tribute to George Floyd during his funeral.
