Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Infraspecific name

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Name of a taxon, at a rank lower than species
This article is about the scientific names of plants and fungi. For the equivalent naming of animals, seeTrinomen. For the names of cultivated plants, seeInternational Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants.

Inbotany, aninfraspecific name is thescientific name for anytaxon below therank ofspecies, i.e. aninfraspecific taxon orinfraspecies. The scientific names of botanical taxa are regulated by theInternational Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN).[1] As specified by the ICN, the name of an infraspecific taxon is a combination of the name of a species and aninfraspecific epithet,[2] separated by a connecting term that denotes the rank of the taxon. An example of an infraspecific name isAstrophytum myriostigma subvar. glabrum, the name of a subvariety of the speciesAstrophytum myriostigma (bishop's hat cactus). In the previous example,glabrum is the infraspecific epithet.

Names below the rank of species of animals and of cultivated plants are regulated by different codes of nomenclature and are formed somewhat differently.

Construction of infraspecific names

[edit]

Article 24 of the ICN describes how infraspecific names are constructed.[2] The order of the three parts of an infraspecific name is:

genus name, specific epithet, connecting term indicating the rank (not part of the name, but required), infraspecific epithet.

It is customary to italicize all three parts of such a name, but not the connecting term.[3] For example:

  • Acanthocalycium klimpelianum var.macranthum
genus name =Acanthocalycium, specific epithet =klimpelianum, connecting term = var. (short for "varietas" orvariety), infraspecific epithet =macranthum
  • Astrophytum myriostigma subvar.glabrum
genus name =Astrophytum, specific epithet =myriostigma, connecting term = subvar. (short for "subvarietas" or subvariety), infraspecific epithet =glabrum

The recommended abbreviations for ranks below species are:[4]

  • subspecies - recommended abbreviation: subsp. (but "ssp." is also in use although not recognised by Art 26)
  • varietas (variety) - recommended abbreviation: var.
  • subvarietas (subvariety) - recommended abbreviation: subvar.
  • forma (form) - recommended abbreviation: f.
  • subforma (subform) - recommended abbreviation: subf.

Although the connecting terms mentioned above are the recommended ones, the ICN allows for other connecting terms in validly published infraspecific taxa. It specifically mentions that Greek letters α, β, γ, etc. can be used in this way in the original document[5] and further ranks may be added without limit.[6] Names that use these connecting terms are now deprecated (though still legal), but they have an importance because they can bebasionyms of current species. The commonest cases use "β" and "b"; examples mentioned in the ICN areCynoglossum cheirifolium β Anchusa (lanata)[7] andPolyporus fomentarius βapplanatus[8] whilst other examples (coming from the fungus databaseIndex Fungorum) areAgaricus plexipes bfuliginaria[9] andPeziza capula ßcernua.[10] The ICN allows the possibility that avalidly published name could have no defined rank and uses "[unranked]" as the connecting term in such cases.[11]

Abbreviation of infraspecific names

[edit]

Like specific epithets, infraspecific epithets cannot be used in isolation as names.[12] Thus the name of a particular species ofAcanthocalycium isAcanthocalycium klimpelianum, which can be abbreviated toA. klimpelianum where the context makes the genus clear. The species cannot be referred to as justklimpelianum. In the same way, the name of a particular variety ofAcanthocalycium klimpelianum isAcanthocalycium klimpelianum var.macranthum, which can be abbreviated toA. k. var.macranthum where the context makes the species clear. The variety cannot be referred to as justmacranthum.

Sometimes more than three parts will be given; strictly speaking, this is not a name, but aclassification. The ICN gives the example ofSaxifraga aizoon var.aizoon subvar.brevifolia f.multicaulis subf.surculosa; the name of the subform would beSaxifraga aizoon subf.surculosa.[13]

Legitimate infraspecific names

[edit]

For a proposed infraspecific name to be legitimate it must be in accordance with all the rules of the ICN.[14] Only some of the main points are described here.

A key concept in botanical names is that of atype. In many cases the type will be a particular preserved specimen stored in aherbarium, although there are other kinds of type. Like other names, an infraspecific name is attached to a type. Whether a plant should be given a particular infraspecific name can then be decided by comparing it to the type.[15]

There is no requirement for a species to be divided into infraspecific taxa, of whatever rank; in other words, a species does not have to have subspecies, varieties, forms, etc. However, if infraspecific ranks are created, then the name of the type of the species must repeat the specific epithet as its infraspecific epithet. The type acquires this name automatically as soon as any infraspecific rank is created.[16] As an example, considerPoa secundaJ.Presl, whose type specimen is in the Wisconsin State Herbarium.[17]

  • As soon as a subspecies ofPoa secunda was created, then the type specimen ofP. secunda immediately became the type specimen ofPoa secunda subsp.secunda. The name "Poa secunda subsp.secunda" was automatically created (it is an "autonym"). Soreng created the subspeciesPoa secunda subsp.juncifolia (whose type specimen is also in the Wisconsin State Herbarium),[17] thereby making the type specimen ofP. secunda also the type specimen ofPoa secunda subsp.secunda.
  • If in addition to the subspecies any variety ofPoa secunda were to be created, then the type specimen ofP. secunda would automatically become the type specimen ofPoa secunda var.secunda. The type specimen would then have the classificationPoa secunda subsp.secunda var.secunda.

The same epithet can be used again within a species, at whatever level, only if the names with the re-used epithet are attached to the same type.[16] Thus there can be a form calledPoa secunda f.juncifolia as well as the subspeciesPoa secunda subsp.juncifolia if, and only if, the type specimen ofPoa secunda f.juncifolia is the same as the type specimen ofPoa secunda subsp.juncifolia (in other words, if there is a single type specimen whose classification isPoa secunda subsp.juncifolia f.juncifolia).

If two infraspecific taxa which have different types are accidentally given the same epithet, then ahomonym has been created. The earliest published name is the legitimate one and the other must be changed.[18]

Specifying authors

[edit]

When indicating authors for infraspecific names, it is possible to show either just the author(s) of the final, infraspecific epithet, or the authors of both the specific and the infraspecific epithets, as is demonstrated throughout the ICN.[19] Examples:

  • Adenia aculeata subsp.inermis de Wilde
    • This identifies de Wilde as the author who published this name for the subspecies (i.e. who created the epithetinermis). Note that here it was decided not to indicate authority for the species.
  • Pinus nigra J.F.Arnold subsp.salzmannii (Dunal) Franco
    • Here, J.F.Arnold is the author who gave the species,European black pine, its botanical namePinus nigra; Dunal is the author who was the first to publish the epithetsalzmanii for this taxon (as the speciesPinus salzmanii); Franco is the author who reduced the taxon to a subspecies ofPinus nigra.

Difference from zoological nomenclature

[edit]

Inzoological nomenclature, names of taxa below species rank are formed somewhat differently, using atrinomen or 'trinomial name'. No connecting term is required as there is only one rank below species, thesubspecies.

Difference from prokaryotic nomenclature

[edit]

TheProkaryotic Code was split from the ICN in 1975. This nomenclature only governs one infraspecific rank, the subspecies, but allows a number ofinfrasubspecific subdivisions to be used. The authorship is to be specified in the form "Bacillus subtilis subsp.spizizenii Nakamuraet al. 1999.", i.e. with only the infraspecific author.[20]: Rules 13–4, Appendix 10 

Authors may still choose to use ungoverned ranks such as sv. (serovar) and pv. (pathovar).

Cultivated plants

[edit]

TheICN does not regulate the names of cultivated plants, ofcultivars, i.e. plants specifically created for use in agriculture or horticulture. Such names are regulated by theInternational Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (ICNCP).

Although logically below the rank of species (and hence "infraspecific"), acultivar name may be attached to any scientific name at the genus level or below. The minimum requirement is to specify a genus name.[21] For example,Achillea 'Cerise Queen' is a cultivar;Pinus nigra 'Arnold Sentinel' is a cultivar of the speciesP. nigra (which is propagated vegetatively, bycloning).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Turland 2017
  2. ^abTurland 2017, Art. 24
  3. ^See the examples inTurland 2017, Art. 24
  4. ^Turland 2017, Art. 4; abbreviations from Recommendation 5A
  5. ^Turland 2017, Note 1 to Art. 32.1
  6. ^Turland 2017, Art. 4.3 and Art. 2
  7. ^Turland 2017, Art. 24.4 Ex. 9
  8. ^Turland 2017, entryBoletus applanatus of Appendix III
  9. ^"Agaricus plexipes bfuliginaria page".Species Fungorum. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. Retrieved2019-02-21.
  10. ^"Peziza capula ßcernua page".Species Fungorum. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. Retrieved2019-02-21.
  11. ^Turland 2017, for instanceAgaricus compactus [unranked]sarcocephalus in Art. 50E.Ex 7, orGeranium andicola [unranked]longipedicellatum in Art. 37.3.Ex. 5
  12. ^Turland 2017, Art. 24.1
  13. ^Turland 2017, Art. 24.1, Ex. 1
  14. ^Turland 2017, Appendix I Glossary of terms used and defined in this Code, entry for "legitimate name"
  15. ^Turland 2017, Art. 7
  16. ^abTurland 2017, Art. 26
  17. ^abWisconsin Botanical Information System: Type Specimens, Wisconsin State Herbarium, University of Wisconsin, archived fromthe original on 2011-09-27, retrieved2011-06-01
  18. ^Turland 2017, Art. 53.3
  19. ^"International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants".www.iapt-taxon.org. Archived fromthe original on 2025-01-30. Retrieved2025-02-02.
  20. ^Oren, Aharon; Arahal, David R.; Göker, Markus; Moore, Edward R. B.; Rossello-Mora, Ramon; Sutcliffe, Iain C. (1 May 2023)."International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic Code (2022 Revision)".International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.73 (5a).doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.005585.hdl:10261/338243.
  21. ^Brickell, C.D.; Alexander, C.; David, J.C.; Hetterscheid, W.L.A.; Leslie, A.C.; Malecot, V.; Jin, X.; Editorial committee; Cubey, J.J. (2009).International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (ICNCP or Cultivated Plant Code) incorporating the Rules and Recommendations for naming plants in cultivation, Eighth Edition, Adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences International Commission for the Nomenclature of Cultivated Plants(PDF). International Association for Plant Taxonomy and International Society for Horticultural Science.

Bibliography

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Infraspecific_name&oldid=1310016337"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp