Indigenous peoples, whether residing in rural or urban areas, often maintain aspects of their cultural practices, includingreligion,social organization, andsubsistence practices. Over time, these cultures have evolved, preserving traditional customs while adapting to modern needs. Some Indigenous groups remain relatively isolated fromWestern culture, with some still classified asuncontacted peoples.
The Americas also host millions of individuals of mixed Indigenous, European, and sometimes African or Asian descent, historically referred to asmestizos in Spanish-speaking countries.[39][40] In manyLatin American nations, people of partial Indigenous descent constitute a majority or significant portion of the population, particularly in Central America, Mexico, Peru, Bolivia,Ecuador,Colombia,Venezuela,Chile, and Paraguay.[41][42][43] Mestizos outnumber Indigenous peoples in most Spanish-speaking countries, according to estimates of ethnic cultural identification. However, since Indigenous communities in the Americas are defined bycultural identification andkinship rather than ancestry orrace, mestizos are typically not counted among the Indigenous population unless they speak an Indigenous language or identify with a specific Indigenous culture.[44] Additionally, many individuals of wholly Indigenous descent who do not follow Indigenous traditions or speak an Indigenous language have been classified or self-identified as mestizo due to assimilation into the dominantHispanic culture. In recent years, the self-identified Indigenous population in many countries has increased as individuals reclaim their heritage amid rising Indigenous-led movements forself-determination andsocial justice.[45]
In past centuries, Indigenous peoples had diverse societal, governmental, and subsistence systems. Some Indigenous peoples were historicallyhunter-gatherers, while others practiced agriculture andaquaculture. Various Indigenous societies developed complexsocial structures, including precontact monumental architecture, organized cities,city-states, chiefdoms, states, monarchies, republics, confederacies, andempires.[46] These societies possessed varying levels of knowledge in fields such asengineering,architecture, mathematics, astronomy,writing, physics, medicine,agriculture, irrigation, geology, mining, metallurgy,art,sculpture, and goldsmithing.
ANavajo boy in the desert in present-dayMonument Valley inArizona with the "Three Sisters" rock formation in the background in 2007Indigenous populations of the Americas in 2024
The islands came to be known as the "West Indies" (or "Antilles"), a name that is still used to describe the islands. This led to the blanket term "Indies" and "Indians" (Spanish:indios;Portuguese:índios;French:indiens;Dutch:indianen) for the Indigenous inhabitants, which implied some kind of ethnic or cultural unity among the Indigenous peoples of the Americas. This unifying concept, codified in law, religion, and politics, was not originally accepted by the myriad groups of Indigenous peoples themselves but has since been embraced or tolerated by many over the last two centuries.[53] The termFirst Nations is used in Canada to identify that type of Indigenous people.
The term "Indian" (or First Nations in Canada) generally does not include the culturally andlinguistically distinct Indigenous peoples of the Arctic regions of the Americas, including theAleuts,Inuit, orYupik peoples. These peoples entered the continent as a second, more recent wave of migration several thousand years later and have much more recent genetic and cultural commonalities with theIndigenous peoples of Siberia. However, these groups are nonetheless considered among the "Indigenous peoples of the Americas".[54]
The termAmerindian, aportmanteau of "American Indian", was coined in 1902 by theAmerican Anthropological Association. It has been controversial ever since its creation. It was immediately rejected by some leading members of the Association, and, while adopted by many, it was never universally accepted.[55] While never popular in Indigenous communities themselves, it remains a preferred term among some anthropologists, notably in some parts of Canada and theEnglish-speaking Caribbean.[56][57][58][59]
"Indigenous peoples in Canada" is used as the collective name forFirst Nations,Inuit, andMétis.[60][61] The termAboriginal peoples as acollective noun (also describing First Nations, Inuit, and Métis) is a specificterm of art used in some legal documents, including theConstitution Act, 1982.[62] Over time, as societal perceptions and government–indigenous relationships have shifted, many historical terms have changed definitions or been replaced as they have fallen out of favor.[63] The use of the term "Indian" is frowned upon because it represents the imposition and restriction of Indigenous peoples and cultures by the Canadian Government.[63] The terms "Native" and "Eskimo" are generally regarded as disrespectful (in Canada), and so are rarely used unless specifically required.[64] While "Indigenous peoples" is the preferred term, many individuals or communities may choose to describe their identity using a different term.[63][64]
The Métis people of Canada can be contrasted, for instance, to the Indigenous-European mixed-racemestizos (orcaboclos in Brazil) ofHispanic America whose large populations constitute outright majorities, pluralities, or at the least large minorities in most Latin American countries. They identify largely as an ethnic group distinct from Europeans and Indigenous, but consider themselves a subset of the European-derivedHispanic orBrazilian peoplehood in culture and ethnicity (cf.ladinos).
AmongSpanish-speaking countries,indígenas orpueblos indígenas ("Indigenous peoples") is a common term, thoughnativos orpueblos nativos ('native peoples') may also be heard; moreover,aborigen ('aborigine') is used inArgentina andpueblos originarios ('original peoples') is common inChile. In Brazil,indígenas andpovos originários ("Indigenous peoples") are common formal-sounding designations, whileíndio ('Indian') is still the more often heard term (the noun for the South-Asian nationality beingindiano), but since the early 2010s has been considered offensive and pejorative.[citation needed]Aborígene andnativo are rarely used in Brazil in Indigenous-specific contexts (e.g.,aborígene is usually understood as the ethnonym forIndigenous Australians). The Spanish and Portuguese equivalents toIndian, nevertheless, could be used to mean anyhunter-gatherer or full-blooded Indigenous person, particularly to continents other than Europe or Africa—for example,indios filipinos.[citation needed]
Indigenous peoples of the United States are commonly known asNative Americans, Indians, as well asAlaska Natives.[clarification needed] The term "Indian" is still used in some communities and remains in use in the official names of many institutions and businesses inIndian Country.[65]
The various nations, tribes, and bands of Indigenous peoples of the Americas have differing preferences in terminology for themselves.[66][page needed] While there are regional and generational variations in which umbrella terms are preferred for Indigenous peoples as a whole, in general, most Indigenous peoples prefer to be identified by the name of their specific nation, tribe, or band.[66][67]
Early settlers often adopted terms that some tribes used for each other, not realizing these were derogatory terms used by enemies. When discussing broader subsets of peoples, naming has often been based on shared language, region, or historical relationship.[68] Many Englishexonyms have been used to refer to the Indigenous peoples of the Americas. Some of these names were based on foreign language terms used by earlier explorers and colonists, while others resulted from the colonists' attempts to translate or transliterateendonyms from the native languages. Other terms arose during periods of conflict between the colonists and Indigenous peoples.[69]
Since the late 20th century, Indigenous peoples in the Americas have been more vocal about how they want to be addressed, pushing to suppress the use of terms widely considered to be obsolete, inaccurate, orracist. During the latter half of the 20th century and the rise of theIndian rights movement, theUnited States federal government responded by proposing the use of the term "Native American", to recognize the primacy of Indigenous peoples' tenure in the nation.[70] As may be expected among people of over 400 different cultures in the US alone, not all of the people intended to be described by this term have agreed on its use or adopted it. No single group naming convention has been accepted by all Indigenous peoples in the Americas. Most prefer to be addressed as people of their tribe or nations when not speaking about Native Americans/American Indians as a whole.[71]
Since the 1970s, the word "Indigenous", which is capitalized when referring to people, has gradually emerged as a favored umbrella term. The capitalization is to acknowledge that Indigenous peoples have cultures and societies that are equal to Europeans, Africans, and Asians.[67][72] This has recently been acknowledged in theAP Stylebook.[73] Some consider it improper to refer to Indigenous people as "Indigenous Americans" or to append any colonial nationality to the term because Indigenous cultures existed before European colonization. Indigenous groups have territorial claims that are different from modern national and international borders, and when labeled as part of a country, their traditional lands are not acknowledged. Some who have written guidelines consider it more appropriate to describe an Indigenous person as "living in" or "of" the Americas, rather than calling them "American"; or simply calling them "Indigenous" without any addition of a colonial state.[74][75]
While there is general agreement that the Americas were first settled from Asia, the pattern of migration and the place(s) of origin in Eurasia of the peoples who migrated to the Americas remain unclear.[79] The traditional theory is thatAncient Beringians moved when sea levels were significantly lowered due to theQuaternary glaciation,[85][86] following herds of now-extinctPleistocenemegafauna alongice-free corridors that stretched between theLaurentide andCordilleran ice sheets.[87] Another route proposed is that, either on foot or usingboats, they migrated down the Pacific coast toSouth America as far asChile.[88] Any archaeological evidence of coastal occupation during the last Ice Age would now have been covered by thesea level rise, up to a hundred metres since then.[89]
The precise date for the peopling of the Americas is a long-standing open question. While advances inarchaeology,Pleistocenegeology,physical anthropology, andDNA analysis have progressively shed more light on the subject, significant questions remain unresolved.[90][91] TheClovis First theory refers to the hypothesis that theClovis culture represents the earliest human presence in the Americas about 13,000 years ago.[92]Evidence of pre-Clovis cultures has accumulated and pushed back the possible date of the first peopling of the Americas.[93][94][95][96] Academics generally believe that humans reached North America south of the Laurentide Ice Sheet at some point between 15,000 and 20,000 years ago.[90][93][97][98][99][100] Some new controversial archaeological evidence suggests the possibility that human arrival in the Americas may have occurred prior to theLast Glacial Maximum more than 20,000 years ago.[93][101][102][103][104][105] TheSwan Point Archaeological Site located inAlaska has yielded the oldest evidence of human habitation that is not disputed, with artifacts that have radiocarbon dates of 14,000 years, indicating the site was occupied around 12,000 BCE.[106][107][108]
The pre-Columbian era refers to allperiod subdivisions in thehistory and prehistory of the Americas before the appearance of significant European and African influences on the American continents, spanning the time of the original arrival in theUpper Paleolithic toEuropean colonization during theearly modern period.[110]TheNorte Chico civilization (in present-day Peru) is one of the defining six original civilizations of the world, arising independently around the same time as that of Egypt.[111][112] Many later pre-Columbian civilizations achieved great complexity, with hallmarks that included permanent or urban settlements, agriculture, engineering, astronomy, trade, civic and monumental architecture, andcomplex societal hierarchies. Some of these civilizations had long faded by the time of the first significant European and African arrivals (ca. late 15th–early 16th centuries), and are known only throughoral history and through archaeological investigations. Others were contemporary with the contact and colonization period and were documented in historical accounts of the time. A few, such as the Mayan, Olmec, Mixtec,Aztec, andNahua peoples, had their written languages and records. However, the European colonists of the time worked to eliminate non-Christian beliefs and burned many pre-Columbian written records. Only a few documents remained hidden and survived, leaving contemporary historians with glimpses of ancient culture and knowledge.
According to both Indigenous and European accounts and documents, American civilizations before and at the time of European encounter had achieved great complexity and many accomplishments.[113] For instance, the Aztecs built one of the largest cities in the world,Tenochtitlan (the historical site of what would becomeMexico City), with an estimated population of 200,000 for the city proper and a population of close to five million for the extended empire.[114] By comparison, the largest European cities in the 16th century were Constantinople and Paris with 300,000 and 200,000 inhabitants respectively.[115] The population in London, Madrid, and Rome hardly exceeded 50,000 people. In 1523, right around the time of the Spanish conquest, the entire population in the country of England was just under three million people.[116] This fact speaks to the level of sophistication, agriculture, governmental procedure, and rule of law that existed in Tenochtitlan, needed to govern over such a large citizenry. Indigenous civilizations also displayed impressive accomplishments in astronomy and mathematics, including the most accurate calendar in the world.[citation needed] The domestication ofmaize or corn required thousands of years of selective breeding, and continued cultivation of multiple varieties was done with planning and selection, generally by women.
Inuit, Yupik, Aleut, and Indigenouscreation myths tell of a variety of origins of their respective peoples. Some were "always there" or were created by gods or animals, some migrated from a specifiedcompass point, and others came from "across the ocean".[117]
Areas of Indigenous peoples in North America at time ofEuropean colonizationAreas of Indigenous peoples in South and Central America at the time of European colonization (in Spanish)An illustration inFlorentine Codex, compiled between 1540 and 1585 CE, depicting theNahua peoples suffering fromsmallpox during the conquest-era in central MexicoIndigenous people at a farm plantation inMinas Gerais in present-dayBrazil,c. 1824Members of anuncontacted tribe encountered inAcre in Brazil in 2009
The European colonization of the Americas fundamentally changed the lives and cultures of the resident Indigenous peoples. Although the exact pre-colonization population count of the Americas is unknown, scholars estimate that Indigenous populations diminished by between 80% and 90% during the first centuries of European colonization. Most scholars estimate a pre-colonization population of around 50 million, with other scholars arguing for an estimate of 100 million. Estimates reach as high as 145 million.[118][119][120]William Denevan estimates of the pre-contact population range from 8 million to 112 million, falling to under 6 million by 1650.[121]
Epidemics ravaged the Americas with diseases, such assmallpox,measles, andcholera, which the early colonists brought from Europe. The spread of infectious diseases was slow initially, as European populations were relatively small. This changed when the Europeans began thetrafficking of massive numbers ofenslaved Western and Central African people to the Americas, drastically increasing the population. These enslaved Africans carried many of the same diseases as Europeans, such as smallpox, along with many tropical diseases unknown to both the indigenous populations and Europeans. In 1520, an African who had been infected with smallpox had arrived in Yucatán. By 1558, the disease had spread throughout South America and had arrived at the Plata basin.[122] Colonist violence towards Indigenous peoples accelerated the loss of lives. European colonists perpetrated massacres on the Indigenous peoples and enslaved them.[123][124][125] According to the U.S. Bureau of the Census (1894), theNorth American Indian Wars of the 19th century had a known death toll of about 19,000 Europeans and 30,000 Native Americans, and an estimated total death toll of 45,000 Native Americans.[126]
The first Indigenous group encountered by Columbus, the 250,000Taínos ofHispaniola, represented the dominant culture in theGreater Antilles and the Bahamas. Within thirty years about 70% of the Taínos had died.[127] They had no immunity to European diseases, so outbreaks ofmeasles andsmallpox ravaged their population.[128] One such outbreak occurred in a camp of enslaved Africans, where smallpox spread to the nearbyTaíno population and reduced their numbers by 50%.[122] Increasing punishment of the Taínos for revolting against forced labor, despite measures put in place by theencomienda, which included religious education and protection from warring tribes,[129] eventually led to the last greatTaíno rebellion (1511–1529).
Following years of mistreatment, the Taínos began to adopt suicidal behaviors, with women aborting or killing their infants and men jumping from cliffs or ingesting untreatedcassava, a violent poison.[127] Eventually, a Taíno Cacique namedEnriquillo managed to hold out in theBaoruco Mountain Range for thirteen years, causing serious damage to the Spanish, Carib-held plantations and theirIndian auxiliaries.[130][failed verification] Hearing of the seriousness of the revolt,Emperor Charles V (also King of Spain) sent Captain Francisco Barrionuevo to negotiate a peace treaty with the ever-increasing number of rebels. Two months later, after consultation with the Audencia of Santo Domingo, Enriquillo was offered any part of the island to live in peace.
TheLaws of Burgos, 1512–1513, were the first codified set of laws governing the behavior of Spanish settlers in America, particularly concerning Indigenous peoples. The laws forbade the maltreatment of them and endorsed their conversion toCatholicism.[131] The Spanish crown found it difficult to enforce these laws in distant colonies.
Epidemic disease was the overwhelming cause of thepopulation decline of the Indigenous peoples.[132][133] After initial contact with Europeans and Africans,Old World diseases caused the deaths of 90 to 95% of the native population of theNew World in the following 150 years.[134]Smallpox killed from one-third to half of the native population of Hispaniola in 1518.[135][136] By killing the Incan rulerHuayna Capac, smallpox caused theInca Civil War of 1529–1532. Smallpox was only the first epidemic.Typhus (probably) in 1546,influenza and smallpox together in 1558, smallpox again in 1589,diphtheria in 1614, andmeasles in 1618—all ravaged the remains of Inca culture.
Smallpox killed millions of native inhabitants of Mexico.[137][138] Unintentionally introduced at Veracruz with the arrival ofPánfilo de Narváez on 23 April 1520, smallpox ravaged Mexico in the 1520s,[139] possibly killing over 150,000 in Tenochtitlán (the heartland of the Aztec Empire) alone, and aiding in the victory ofHernán Cortés over theAztec Empire at Tenochtitlan (present-day Mexico City) in 1521.[citation needed][122]
There are many factors as to why Indigenous peoples suffered such immense losses from Afro-Eurasian diseases. Many Old World diseases, like cow pox, are acquired from domesticated animals that are not indigenous to the Americas. European populations had adapted to these diseases, and built up resistance, over many generations. Many of the Old World diseases that were brought over to the Americas were diseases, likeyellow fever, that were relatively manageable if infected as a child, but were deadly if infected as an adult. Children could often survive the disease, resulting in immunity to the disease for the rest of their lives. But contact with the disease by adults without this childhood or inherited immunity often proved fatal.[122][140]
Colonization of the Caribbean led to the destruction of theArawaks of theLesser Antilles. Their culture was destroyed by 1650. Only 500 had survived by the year 1550, though the bloodlines continued through to the modern populace. In Amazonia, Indigenous societies weathered centuries of colonization and genocide.[141]
Contact with European diseases such as smallpox and measles killed between 50 and 67 percent of the Indigenous population of North America in the first hundred years after the arrival of Europeans.[142] Some 90 percent of the native population nearMassachusetts Bay Colony died of smallpox in an epidemic in 1617–1619.[143] In 1633, inFort Orange (New Netherland), the Native Americans there were exposed to smallpox because of contact with Europeans. As it had done elsewhere, the virus wiped out entire population groups of Native Americans.[144] It reachedLake Ontario in 1636, and the lands of theIroquois by 1679.[145][146] During the 1770s smallpox killed at least 30% of theWest Coast Native Americans.[147] The1775–82 North American smallpox epidemic and the1837 Great Plains smallpox epidemic brought devastation and drastic population depletion among thePlains Indians.[148][149] In 1832 the federal government of the United States established asmallpox vaccination program for Native Americans (The Indian Vaccination Act of 1832).[150]
TheSpanish Empire and other Europeans re-introducedhorses to the Americas. Some of these animals escaped and began to breed and increase their numbers in the wild.[153] The reintroduction of thehorse, extinct in the Americas for over 7500 years, had a profound impact onIndigenous cultures in several regions, such as those of theGreat Plains, theNorthwest Plateau, theGreat Basin,Aridoamerica, theGran Chaco and theSouthern Cone. By domesticating horses, some tribes had great success: horses enabled them to expand their territories, exchange more goods with neighboring tribes, and more easily capturegame, such asbison.
According to Erin McKenna and Scott L. Pratt, the Indigenous population of the Americas was 145 million in the late 15th and by the late 17th century, had been reduced to 15 million due toepidemics, wars, massacres,mass rapes, starvation, and enslavement.[120]
Indigenous historical trauma (IHT) is the trauma that can accumulate across generations and develop as a result of the historical ramifications ofcolonization and is linked to mental and physical health hardships and population decline.[154] IHT affects many different people in a multitude of ways because the Indigenous community and their history are diverse.
Many studies (such as Whitbeck et al., 2014;[155] Brockie, 2012; Anastasio et al., 2016;[156] Clark & Winterowd, 2012;[157] Tucker et al., 2016)[158] have evaluated the impact of IHT on health outcomes of Indigenous communities from the United States and Canada. IHT is a difficult term to standardize and measure because of the vast and variable diversity of Indigenous people and their communities. Therefore, it is an arduous task to assign anoperational definition and systematically collect data when studying IHT. Many of the studies that incorporate IHT measure it in different ways, making it hard to compile data and review it holistically. This is an important point that provides context for the following studies that attempt to understand the relationship between IHT and potential adverse health impacts.
Some of the methodologies to measure IHT include a "Historical Losses Scale" (HLS), "Historical Losses Associated Symptoms Scale" (HLASS), and residential school ancestry studies.[154]: 23 HLS uses a survey format that includes "12 kinds of historical losses", such as loss of language and loss of land and asks participants how often they think about those losses.[154]: 23 The HLASS includes 12 emotional reactions, and asks participants how they feel when they think about these losses.[154] Lastly, theresidential school ancestry studies ask respondents if their parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, or "elders from their community" went to a residential school to understand if family or community history in residential schools is associated with negative health outcomes.[154]: 25 In a comprehensive review of the research literature, Joseph Gone and colleagues[154] compiled and compared outcomes for studies using these IHT measures relative to the health outcomes of Indigenous peoples. The study defined negative health outcomes to include such concepts asanxiety,suicidal ideation,suicide attempts,polysubstance abuse,PTSD,depression,binge eating, anger, and sexual abuse.[154]
The connection between IHT and health conditions is complicated because of the difficult nature of measuring IHT, the unknown directionality of IHT and health outcomes, and because the termIndigenous people used in the various samples comprises a huge population of individuals with drastically different experiences and histories. That being said some studies such as Bombay, Matheson, and Anisman (2014),[159] Elias et al. (2012),[160] and Pearce et al. (2008)[161] found that Indigenous respondents with a connection to residential schools have more negative health outcomes (e.g., suicide ideation, suicide attempts, and depression) than those who did not have a connection to residential schools. Additionally, Indigenous respondents with higher HLS and HLASS scores had one or more negative health outcomes.[154] While there are many studies[156][162][157][163][158] that found an association between IHT and adverse health outcomes, scholars continue to suggest that it remains difficult to understand the impact of IHT. IHT needs to be systematically measured. Indigenous people also need to be understood in separate categories based on similar experiences, location, and background as opposed to being categorized as one monolithic group.[154]
A bison hunt depicted in a painting byGeorge Catlin (1844)A representation of the domesticated plant species cultivated by Indigenous peoples have influenced the crops that were produced globally.
For thousands of years, Indigenous peoples domesticated, bred, and cultivated a large array of plant species. These species now constitute between 50% and 60% of all crops in cultivation worldwide.[164] In certain cases, the Indigenous peoples developed entirely new species and strains throughartificial selection, as with the domestication and breeding ofmaize from wildteosinte grasses in the valleys of southern Mexico. Numerous such agricultural products retain their Native names in the English and Spanish lexicons.
The South American highlands became a center of early agriculture. Genetic testing of the wide variety ofcultivars and wild species suggests that thepotato has a single origin in the area of southernPeru,[165] from a species in theSolanum brevicaule complex. Over 99% of all modern cultivated potatoes worldwide are descendants of a subspecies indigenous to south-centralChile,[166]Solanum tuberosum ssp. tuberosum, where it was cultivated as long as 10,000 years ago.[167][168] According toLinda Newson, "It is clear that in pre-Columbian times some groups struggled to survive and often suffered food shortages andfamines, while others enjoyed a varied and substantial diet."[169]
Persistent drought around AD 850 coincided with the collapse of theClassic Maya civilization, and the famine of One Rabbit (AD 1454) was a major catastrophe in Mexico.[170]
Thecommon bean is native to Mexico and Central America and later began to be cultivated in South America.
Indigenous peoples of North America began practicingfarming approximately 4,000 years ago, late in theArchaic period of North American cultures. Technology had advanced to the point where pottery had started to become common and the small-scale felling of trees had become feasible. Concurrently, the ArchaicIndigenous peoples began using fire in a controlled manner. They carried out the intentional burning of vegetation to mimic the effects of natural fires that tended to clear forest understories. It made travel easier and facilitated the growth of herbs and berry-producing plants, which were important both for food and for medicines.[171]
In theMississippi River valley, Europeans noted that Native Americans managed groves ofnut andfruit trees not far from villages and towns and their gardens and agricultural fields. They would have usedprescribed burning farther away, in forest and prairie areas.[172]
The tomato (jitomate, in central Mexico) was later cultivated by the pre-Hispanic civilizations of Mexico.
Studies of contemporary Indigenous environmental management—including agro-forestry practices amongItzaMaya in Guatemala and hunting and fishing among theMenominee of Wisconsin—suggest that longstanding "sacred values" may represent a summary of sustainable millennial traditions.[174]
In the Andean region, Indigenous peoples domesticated llamas andalpacas to produce fiber and meat. The llama was the onlybeast of burden in the Americas before European colonization.
Guinea pigs were domesticated from wildcavies to be raised for meat consumption in the Andean region. Guinea pigs are now widely raised in Western society as household pets.
Cultural practices in the Americas seem to have been shared mostly within geographical zones where distinct ethnic groups adopt shared cultural traits, similar technologies, and social organizations. An example of such acultural area isMesoamerica, where millennia of coexistence and shared development among the peoples of the region produced a fairly homogeneous culture with complex agricultural and social patterns. Another well-known example is the North American plains where until the 19th century several peoples shared the traits ofnomadic hunter-gatherers based primarily on bison hunting.
Indigenous languages in North America have been classified into 56 groups or stock tongues, in which the spoken languages of the various nations may be said to center. In connection with speech, reference may be made to gesture language which was highly developed in parts of this area. Of equal interest is the picture writing especially well developed among theAnishinaabe andLenape nations.[184]
Beginning in the 1st millennium BCE, pre-Columbian cultures inMesoamerica developed severalIndigenous writing systems (independent of any influence from the writing systems that existed in other parts of the world). TheCascajal Block is perhaps the earliest-known example in the Americas of what may be an extensive written text. TheOlmec hieroglyphs tablet has been indirectly dated (from ceramic shards found in the same context) to approximately 900 BCE which is around the same time that the Olmec occupation ofSan Lorenzo Tenochtitlán began to weaken.[185]
TheMaya writing system waslogosyllabic (a combination ofphoneticsyllabic symbols andlogograms). It is the only pre-Columbian writing system known to have completely represented thespoken language of its community. It has more than a thousand differentglyphs, but a few are variations on the same sign or have the same meaning, many appear only rarely or in particular localities, no more than about five hundred were in use in any given time, and, of those, it seems only about two hundred (including variations) represented a particular phoneme or syllable.[186][187][188]
TheZapotec writing system, one of the earliest in the Americas,[189] waslogographic and presumablysyllabic.[189] There are remnants of Zapotec writing in inscriptions on some of the monumental architecture of the period, but so few inscriptions are extant that it is difficult to fully describe the writing system. The oldest example of the Zapotec script, dating from around 600 BCE, is on a monument that was discovered inSan José Mogote.[190][full citation needed]
Aztec codices (singularcodex) are books that were written by pre-Columbian and colonial-eraAztecs. These codices are some of the bestprimary sources for descriptions ofAztec culture. The pre-Columbian codices are largely pictorial; they do not contain symbols that represent spoken or written language.[191] By contrast, colonial-era codices contain not onlyAztec pictograms, but also writing that uses theLatin alphabet in several languages:Classical Nahuatl, Spanish, and occasionallyLatin.
Spanish mendicants in the sixteenth century taught Indigenous scribes in their communities to write their languages using Latin letters, and there are a large number of local-level documents inNahuatl,Zapotec,Mixtec, and YucatecMaya from the colonial era, many of which were part of lawsuits and other legal matters. Although Spaniards initially taught Indigenous scribes alphabetic writing, the tradition became self-perpetuating at the local level.[192] The Spanish crown gathered such documentation, and contemporary Spanish translations were made for legal cases. Scholars have translated and analyzed these documents in what is called theNew Philology to write histories of Indigenous peoples from Indigenous viewpoints.[193]
Aboriginal syllabic writing, or simply syllabics, is a family ofabugidas used to write some Indigenous languages of theAlgonquian,Inuit, andAthabaskan language families.
Indigenous peoples textile art in 1995 by Julia Pingushat, includingInuk,Arviat, Nunavut, Canada, wool, and embroidery flossChimu culture feather pectoral, feathers, reed, copper, silver, hide, cordage,c. 1350–1450An Indigenous man playing a panpipe, antara, or siku
Indigenous music can vary between cultures, however, there are significant commonalities. Traditional music often centers arounddrumming and singing.Rattles,clapper sticks, and rasps are also popular percussive instruments, both historically and in contemporary cultures.Flutes are made of river cane, cedar, and other woods. TheApache have a type offiddle, andfiddles are also found manyFirst Nations andMétis cultures.
The music of the Indigenous peoples of Central Mexico and Central America, like that of the North American cultures, tends to be spiritual ceremonies. It traditionally includes a large variety of percussion andwind instruments such as drums, flutes, sea shells (used as trumpets), and "rain" tubes. No remnants of pre-Columbian stringed instruments were found until archaeologists discovered a jar in Guatemala, attributed to the Maya of the Late Classic Era (600–900 CE); this jar was decorated with imagery depicting a stringed musical instrument, which has since been reproduced. This instrument is one of the very few stringed instruments known in the Americas before the introduction of Europeanmusical instruments; when played, it produces a sound that mimics a jaguar's growl.[194]
After the entry of the Spaniards, the process of spiritual conquest was favored, among other things, by theliturgical musical service to which the natives, whose musical gifts came to surprise the missionaries, were integrated. The musical gifts of the natives were of such magnitude that they soon learned the rules of counterpoint andpolyphony and even the virtuous handling of the instruments. This helped to ensure that it was not necessary to bring more musicians from Spain, which significantly annoyed the clergy.[200]
The solution that was proposed was not to employ but a certain number of Indigenous people in the musical service, not to teach them counterpoint, not to allow them to play certain instruments (brass breaths, for example, inOaxaca, Mexico) and, finally, not to import more instruments so that the Indigenous people would not have access to them. The latter was not an obstacle to the musical enjoyment of the natives, who experienced the making of instruments, particularly rubbed strings (violins anddouble basses) or plucked (third). It is there where we can find the origin of what is now called traditional music whose instruments have their tuning and a typical Western structure.[201]
Old Crow Flats andBluefish Caves are some of the earliest known sites of human habitation in Canada.[209] The characteristics of Indigenous cultures in Canada prior to European colonization included permanent settlements,[210] agriculture,[211] civic and ceremonial architecture,[212] complexsocietal hierarchies, andtrading networks.[213] Métis nations of mixed ancestry originated in the mid-17th century when First Nations and Inuit married Europeans, primarilyFrench settlers.[214] First Nations and Métis peoples played a critical part in the development of European colonies in Canada, particularly for their role in assisting Europeans during theNorth American fur trade.
VariousAboriginal laws,treaties, and legislation have been enacted between European immigrants and Indigenous groups across Canada. The impact ofsettler colonialism in Canada can be seen in its culture, history, politics, laws, and legislatures.[215] Historically, this included assimilationist policies affecting Indigenous languages, traditions, religion and the degradation of Indigenous communities that has contemporarily been described by some, including academics and politicians, as acultural genocide, or genocide.[216]
Approximately 89 percent of Greenland's population of 57,695 is GreenlandicInuit, or 51,349 people as of 2012[update].[36][220]Ethnographically, they consist of three major groups:
The territory of modern-day Mexico was home to numerous Indigenous civilizations before the arrival of the Spanishconquistadores: TheOlmecs, who flourished from between 1200 BCE to about 400 BCE in the coastal regions of theGulf of Mexico; theZapotecs and theMixtecs, who held sway in the mountains ofOaxaca and theIsthmus of Tehuantepec; theMaya in theYucatán (and into neighboring areas of contemporary Central America); thePurépecha in present-dayMichoacán and surrounding areas, and theAztecs/Mexica, who, from their central capital atTenochtitlan, dominated much of the center and south of the country (and the non-Aztec inhabitants of those areas) whenHernán Cortés first landed atVeracruz.
In contrast to what was the general rule in the rest of North America, the history of the colony ofNew Spain was one of racial intermingling (mestizaje).Mestizos, which in Mexico designate people who do not identify culturally with any Indigenous grouping, quickly came to account for a majority of the colony's population. Today,Mestizos in Mexico of mixed Indigenous and European ancestry (with a minor African contribution) are still a majority of the population. Genetic studies vary over whether Indigenous or European ancestry predominates in the Mexican Mestizo population.[221][222] In the 2020INEGI census, 23.2 million people (19.4% of the Mexican population aged 3 years and older) self-identified as Indigenous.[2] Somewhat contradictorily, in the same 2020 census, 11.8 million people (9.3% of the Mexican population) were determined to be Indigenous by the Mexican government based on the language spoken in their households.[1] The Indigenous population is distributed throughout the territory of Mexico but is especially concentrated in theSierra Madre del Sur, theYucatán Peninsula, and the most remote and difficult-to-access areas, such as theSierra Madre Oriental, theSierra Madre Occidental, and neighboring areas.[223] TheCDI identifies 62 Indigenous groups in Mexico, each with a unique language.[224][225]
In the states ofChiapas andOaxaca and the interior of theYucatán Peninsula, a large amount of the population is of Indigenous descent with the largest ethnic group being Maya with a population of 900,000.[226] Large Indigenous minorities, includingAztecs orNahua,Purépechas,Mazahua,Otomi, andMixtecs are also present in the central regions of Mexico. In theNorthern andBajio regions of Mexico, Indigenous people are a small minority.
TheGeneral Law of Linguistic Rights of the Indigenous Peoples grants all Indigenous languages spoken in Mexico, regardless of the number of speakers, the same validity as Spanish in all territories in which they are spoken, and Indigenous peoples are entitled to request somepublic services and documents in their native languages.[227] Along with Spanish, the law has granted them—more than 60 languages—the status of "national languages". The law includes all Indigenous languages of the Americas regardless of origin; that is, it includes the Indigenous languages of ethnic groups non-native to the territory. TheNational Commission for the Development of Indigenous Peoples recognizes the language of theKickapoo, who immigrated from the United States[228] and recognizes the languages of the Indigenous refugees from Guatemala.[229] The Mexican government has promoted and established bilingual primary andsecondary education in some Indigenous rural communities. Nonetheless, of the Indigenous peoples in Mexico, 93% are either native speakers or bilingual second-language speakers of Spanish with only about 62.4% of them (or 5.4% of the country's population) speaking an Indigenous language and about a sixth do not speak Spanish (0.7% of the country's population).[230]
The Indigenous peoples in Mexico have the right of free determination under the second article of the constitution. According to this article, the Indigenous peoples are granted:[231]
the right to decide the internal forms of social, economic, political, and cultural organization;
the right to apply their normative systems of regulation as long ashuman rights andgender equality are respected;
the right to preserve and enrich their languages and cultures;
the right to elect representatives before themunicipal council in which their territories are located;
Indigenous peoples in what is now thecontiguous United States, including their descendants, were commonly called American Indians, or simply Indians domestically and since the late 20th century the term Native American came intocommon use. In Alaska, Indigenous peoples belong to 11 cultures with 11 languages. These include theSt. Lawrence Island Yupik,Iñupiat,Athabaskan,Yup'ik,Cup'ik,Unangax,Alutiiq,Eyak,Haida,Tsimshian, andTlingit,[232] and are collectively calledAlaska Natives. They include Native American peoples as well as Inuit, who are distinct but occupy areas of the region.
The United States has authority over IndigenousPolynesian people, which includeHawaiians,Marshallese (Micronesian), andSamoan; politically they are classified asPacific Islander Americans. They are geographically, genetically, and culturally distinct from Indigenous peoples of the mainland continents of the Americas.
In the 2020 census 2.9% of the U.S. population claimed to have some degree of Native American heritage. When answering a question about racial background, 3.7 million people identified solely as "American Indian or Alaska Native", while another 5.9 million did so in combination with other races.[233]Aztecs were the largest single Native American group in the 2020 census, whileCherokee was the largest group in combination with any other race.[234] Tribes have established their criteria for membership, which are often based onblood quantum,lineal descent, or residency. A minority of Native Americans live in land units calledIndian reservations.
There are over 114,000 inhabitants of Native American origins, representing 2.4% of the population. Most of them live in secluded reservations, distributed among eight ethnic groups:Quitirrisí (In the Central Valley),Matambú orChorotega (Guanacaste),Maleku (Northern Alajuela),Bribri (Southern Atlantic),Cabécar (Cordillera de Talamanca),Boruca (Southern Costa Rica) andNgäbe (Southern Costa Rica along the Panamá border).
These native groups are characterized by their work in wood, like masks, drums, and other artistic figures, as well as fabrics made of cotton.
IndigenousPipil women dancing in the traditional Procession of Palms inPanchimalco, El Salvador
Estimates for El Salvador's Indigenous population vary. The 2024 census found that 1.2% of the population, or 68,148 people identified as Indigenous.[21] Historically, estimates have claimed higher amounts. A 1930 census stated that 5.6% were Indigenous.[236] By the mid-20th century, there may have been as much as 20% (or 400,000) that would qualify as "Indigenous". Another estimate stated that by the late 1980s, 10% of the population was Indigenous, and another 89% was mestizo (or people of mixed European and Indigenous ancestry).[237]
Much ofEl Salvador was home to various Indigenous groups like thePipil, theLenca, Mayas (Chorti and Poqomam), Chorotegas, andXincas. The Pipil lived in westernEl Salvador, spokeNawat, and had many settlements there, most notablyCuzcatlan. The Pipil had no precious mineral resources, but they did have rich andfertile land that was good for farming. The Spaniards were disappointed not to find gold or jewels inEl Salvador as they had in other lands likeGuatemala or Mexico, but upon learning of the fertile land in El Salvador, they attempted to conquer it. Noted Meso-American Indigenous warriors to rise militarily against the Spanish included Princes Atonal and Atlacatl of the Pipil people in central El Salvador and Princess Antu Silan Ulap of the Lenca people in eastern El Salvador, who saw the Spanish not as gods but as barbaric invaders. After fierce battles, the Pipil successfully fought off the Spanish army led byPedro de Alvarado along with their Indigenous allies (the Tlaxcalas), sending them back to Guatemala. After many other attacks with an army reinforced with Indigenous allies, the Spanish were able to conquer Cuzcatlan. After further attacks, the Spanish also conquered the Lenca people. Eventually, the Spaniards intermarried with Pipil and Lenca women, resulting in the mestizo population that would make up the vast majority of the Salvadoran people. Today many Pipil and other Indigenous populations live in the many small towns of El Salvador likeIzalco,Panchimalco,Sacacoyo, andNahuizalco.
Modern Maya people inSololá, GuatemalaAn elderly Maya woman
Guatemala has one of the largest Indigenous populations inCentral America, with approximately 43.6% of the population considering themselves Indigenous.[238] TheIndigenous demographic portion of Guatemala's population consists of a majority of Maya groups and one non-Maya group. The Mayan language-speaking portion makes up 29.7% of the population and is distributed into 23 groups namelyQ'eqchi' 8.3%,K'iche 7.8%,Mam 4.4%,Kaqchikel 3%, Q'anjob'al 1.2%, Poqomchi' 1%, and Other 4%.[238] The non-Maya group consists of theXinca who are another set of Indigenous people making up 1.8% of the population.[238] Other sources indicate that between 50% and 60% of the population could be Indigenous because part of the Mestizo population is predominantly Indigenous.
The Maya peoples cover a vast geographic area throughout Central America and expand beyond Guatemala into other countries. One could find vast groups of Maya people in Boca Costa, in the Southern portions of Guatemala, as well as the Western Highlands living together in close communities.[239] Within these communities and outside of them, around 23Indigenous languages (orNative American Indigenous languages) are spoken as a first language. Of these 23 languages, they only received official recognition by the Government in 2003 under the Law of National Languages.[238] The Law on National Languages recognizes 23 Indigenous languages including Xinca, enforcing that public and government institutions not only translate but also provide services in said languages.[240] It would provide services inCakchiquel,Garifuna,Kekchi,Mam,Quiche, andXinca.[241]
The Law of National Languages has been an effort to grant and protect Indigenous peoples' rights not afforded to them previously. Along with the Law of National Languages passed in 2003, in 1996 the Guatemalan Constitutional Court had ratified the ILO Convention 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples.[242] TheILO Convention 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples, is also known as Convention 169. Which is the only International Law regarding Indigenous peoples that Independent countries can adopt. The convention establishes that governments like Guatemala must consult with Indigenous groups before any projects occur on tribal lands.[243]
About 5 percent of the population is of full-blooded Indigenous descent, but as much as 80 percent of Hondurans aremestizo or part-Indigenous with European admixture, and about 10 percent are of Indigenous orAfrican descent.[244] The largest concentrations ofIndigenous communities in Honduras are in the westernmost areas facing Guatemala and along the coast of theCaribbean Sea, as well as on the border with Nicaragua.[244] The majority of Indigenous people areLencas,Miskitos to the east,Mayas,Pech,Sumos, andTolupan.[244]
About 5 percent of theNicaraguan population is Indigenous. The largest Indigenous group in Nicaragua is theMiskito people. Their territory extended fromCabo Camarón, Honduras, toLa Cruz de Rio Grande, Nicaragua along theMosquito Coast. There is a nativeMiskito language, but large numbers speakMiskito Coast Creole, Spanish,Rama, and other languages. Their use ofCreole English came about through frequent contact with the British, who colonized the area. Many Miskitos are Christians. Traditional Miskito society was highly structured, politically and otherwise. It had a king, but he did not have total power. Instead, the power was split between himself, aMiskito Governor, aMiskito General, and by the 1750s, aMiskito Admiral. Historical information on Miskito kings is often obscured by the fact that many of the kings were semi-mythical.
Another major Indigenous culture in eastern Nicaragua is theMayangna (or Sumu) people, counting some 10,000 people.[245] A smaller Indigenous culture in southeastern Nicaragua is theRama.
Indigenous peoples of Panama, or Native Panamanians, are the Native peoples ofPanama. As of the 2023 census, Indigenous peoples constitute 17.2% of Panama's population of 4.5 million, totaling just over 698,000 individuals. TheNgäbe andBuglé comprise half of the Indigenous peoples of Panama.[247]
In 2005, the Indigenous population living in Argentina (known aspueblos originarios) numbered about 600,329 (1.6% of the total population); this figure includes 457,363 people who self-identified as belonging to an Indigenous ethnic group and 142,966 who identified themselves as first-generation descendants of an Indigenous people.[249] The ten most populous Indigenous peoples are theMapuche (113,680 people), theKolla (70,505), theToba (69,452), theGuaraní (68,454), theWichi (40,036), theDiaguita–Calchaquí (31,753), theMocoví (15,837), theHuarpe (14,633), theComechingón (10,863) and theTehuelche (10,590). Minor but important peoples are theQuechua (6,739), theCharrúa (4,511), thePilagá (4,465), the Chané (4,376), and the Chorote (2,613). TheSelkʼnam (Ona) people are now virtually extinct in its pure form. The languages of the Diaguita, Tehuelche, and Selkʼnam nations have become extinct or virtually extinct: the Cacán language (spoken by Diaguitas) in the 18th century and the Selkʼnam language in the 20th century; one Tehuelche language (Southern Tehuelche) is still spoken by a handful of elderly people.
This article'sfactual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(April 2012)
An Indigenous woman in traditional dress nearCochabamba, Bolivia
In Bolivia, the 2012 National Census reported that 41% of residents over the age of 15 are of Indigenous origin. Some 3.7% report growing up with an Indigenous mother tongue but do not identify as Indigenous.[250] When both of these categories are totaled, and children under 15, some 66.4% of Bolivia's population was recorded as Indigenous in the 2001 Census.[251]
The 2021 National Census, recognizes 38 cultures, each with its language, as part of a pluri-national state. Some groups, includingCONAMAQ (the National Council of Ayllus and Markas of Qullasuyu), draw ethnic boundaries within the Quechua- and Aymara-speaking population, resulting in a total of 50 Indigenous peoples native to Bolivia.
The largest Indigenous ethnic groups areQuechua, about 2.5 million people;Aymara, 2 million;Chiquitano, 181,000;Guaraní, 126,000; andMojeño, 69,000. Some 124,000 belong to smaller Indigenous groups.[252] TheConstitution of Bolivia, enacted in 2009, recognizes 36 cultures, each with its language, as part of a pluri-national state. Some groups, includingCONAMAQ (the National Council of Ayllus and Markas of Qullasuyu), draw ethnic boundaries within the Quechua- and Aymara-speaking population, resulting in a total of 50 Indigenous peoples native to Bolivia.
Large numbers of Bolivian highlandpeasants retained Indigenous language, culture, customs, and communal organization throughout the Spanish conquest and the post-independence period. They mobilized to resist various attempts at the dissolution of communal landholdings and used legal recognition of "empowered caciques" to further communal organization. Indigenous revolts took place frequently until 1953.[253] While the National Revolutionary Movement government began in 1952 and discouraged people identifying as Indigenous (reclassifying rural people ascampesinos, or peasants), renewed ethnic and class militancy re-emerged in theKatarista movement beginning in the 1970s.[254] Many lowland Indigenous peoples, mostly in the east, entered national politics through the 1990 March for Territory and Dignity organized by theCIDOB confederation. That march successfully pressured the national government to sign theILO Convention 169 and to begin the still-ongoing process of recognizing and giving official titles to Indigenous territories. The 1994 Law of Popular Participation granted "grassroots territorial organizations;" these are recognized by the state and have certain rights to govern local areas.
Some radio and television programs are produced in the Quechua and Aymara languages. The constitutional reform in 1997 recognized Bolivia as a multi-lingual, pluri-ethnic society and introducededucation reform. In 2005, for the first time in the country's history, an Indigenous Aymara,Evo Morales, was elected as president.
Morales began work on his "Indigenous autonomy" policy, which he launched in the eastern lowlandsdepartment on 3 August 2009. Bolivia was the first nation in the history of South America to affirm the right of Indigenous people to self-government.[255] Speaking inSanta Cruz Department, the President called it "a historic day for the peasant and Indigenous movement", saying that, though he might make errors, he would "never betray the fight started by our ancestors and the fight of the Bolivian people".[255] A vote on further autonomy for jurisdictions took place in December 2009, at the same time as general elections to office. The issue divided the country.[256]
At that time, Indigenous peoples voted overwhelmingly for more autonomy: five departments that had not already done so voted for it;[257][258] as didGran Chaco Province in Taríja, for regional autonomy;[259] and 11 of 12 municipalities that had referendums on this issue.[257]
Indigenous peoples of Brazil make up 0.4% of Brazil's population, or about 817,000 people, but millions of Brazilians are mestizo or have some Indigenous ancestry.[260] Indigenous peoples are found in the entire territory of Brazil, although in the 21st century, the majority of them live inIndigenous territories in the North and Center-Western parts of the country. On 18 January 2007,Fundação Nacional do Índio (FUNAI) reported that it had confirmed the presence of 67 differentuncontacted tribes in Brazil, up from 40 in 2005. Brazil is now the nation that has the largest number of uncontacted tribes, and the island ofNew Guinea is second.[260]
The Washington Post reported in 2007, "As has been proved in the past when uncontacted tribes are introduced to other populations and the microbes they carry, maladies as simple as the common cold can be deadly. In the 1970s, 185 members of thePanara tribe died within two years of discovery after contracting such diseases as flu and chickenpox, leaving only 69 survivors."[261]
A Mapuche man in present-dayChileA Mapuche man and woman; the Mapuche make up about 85% of Indigenous population that live in Chile.
According to the 2012 Census, 10% of the Chilean population, including theRapa Nui (aPolynesian people) ofEaster Island, was Indigenous, although most show varying degrees of mixed heritage.[262] Many are descendants of theMapuche and live inSantiago,Araucanía, andLos Lagos Region. The Mapuche successfully fought off defeat in the first 300–350 years of Spanish rule during theArauco War. Relations with the new Chilean Republic were good until the Chilean state decided to occupy their lands. During theOccupation of Araucanía, the Mapuche surrendered to the country's army in the 1880s. Their land was opened to settlement by Chileans and Europeans.Conflict over Mapuche land rights continues to the present.
Other groups include theAymara, the majority of whom live in Bolivia and Peru, with smaller numbers in theArica-Parinacota andTarapacá regions, and theAtacama people (Atacameños), who reside mainly inEl Loa.
A minority today withinColombia's mostlymestizo andWhite Colombian population, Indigenous peoples living in Colombia, consist of around 85 distinct cultures and around 1,905,617 people, however, it is likely much higher.[263][264] A variety ofcollective rights for Indigenous peoples are recognized in the 1991 Constitution. One of the influences is theMuisca culture, a subset of the largerChibcha ethnic group, famous for their use of gold, which led to the legend ofEl Dorado. At the time of theSpanish conquest, the Muisca were the largest Indigenous civilization geographically between theInca and theAztec empires.
Ecuador was the site of many Indigenous cultures and civilizations of different proportions. An early sedentary culture, known as theValdivia culture, developed in the coastal region, while theCaras and theQuitus unified to form an elaborate civilization that ended at the birth of the Capital Quito. TheCañaris nearCuenca were the most advanced, and most feared by theInca, due to their fierce resistance to the Incan expansion. Their architectural remains were later destroyed by the Spaniards and the Incas.
Between 55% and 65% of Ecuador's population consists of Mestizos of mixed Indigenous and European ancestry, while Indigenous people comprise about 25%.[265] Genetic analysis indicates that Ecuadorian Mestizos are of predominantly Indigenous ancestry.[266] Approximately 96.4% of Ecuador's Indigenous population are Highland Quichuas living in the valleys of the Sierra region. Primarily consisting of the descendants of peoples conquered by the Incas, they areKichwa speakers and include theCaranqui, theOtavalos, the Cayambe, the Quitu-Caras, thePanzaleo, the Chimbuelo, the Salasacan, the Tugua, the Puruhá, theCañari, and theSaraguro. Linguistic evidence suggests that the Salascan and the Saraguro may have been the descendants of Bolivian ethnic groups transplanted to Ecuador asmitimaes.
Coastal groups, including theAwá,Chachi, and theTsáchila, make up 0.24% percent of the Indigenous population, while the remaining 3.35 percent live in the Oriente and consist of the Oriente Kichwa (the Canelo and the Quijos), theShuar, theHuaorani, the Siona-Secoya, theCofán, and theAchuar.
French Guiana is home to approximately 10,000 Indigenous peoples, such as theKalina andLokono. Over time, the Indigenous population has protested against various environmental issues, such as illegal gold mining, pollution, and a drastic decrease in wild game.
During the early stages of colonization, the Indigenous peoples in Guyana partook in trade relations with Dutch settlers and assisted in militia services such as hunting down escaped slaves for the British, which continued until the 19th century. Indigenous Guyanese people are responsible for the invention of theGuyanese pepperpot and the foundation of theAlleluia church.
Guyana's Indigenous peoples have been recognized under the Constitution of 1965 and comprise 9.16% of the overall population.
The vast majority of Indigenous peoples inParaguay are concentrated in theGran Chaco region in the northwest of the country, with theGuaraní making up the majority of the Indigenous population in Paraguay. TheGuaraní language is recognized as an official language alongside Spanish, with approximately 90% of the population speaking Guaraní. The Indigenous population in Paraguay faces challenges such as low literacy rates and lack of safe drinking water or electricity.
According to the2017 Census, the Indigenous population in Peru makes up approximately 26%.[5] However, this does not include mestizos of mixed Indigenous and European descent, who make up the majority of the population. Genetic testing indicates that Peruvian Mestizos are of predominantly Indigenous ancestry.[267] Indigenous traditions and customs have shaped the way Peruvians live and see themselves today. Cultural citizenship — or what Renato Rosaldo has called, "the right to be different and to belong, in a democratic, participatory sense" (1996:243) — is not yet very well developed in Peru. This is most apparent in the country's Amazonian region, where Indigenous societies continue to struggle against state-sponsored economic abuses, cultural discrimination, and pervasive violence.[268]
According to the 2012 census, the Indigenous population of Suriname numbers around 20,000, amounting to 3.8% of the population. The most numerous Indigenous groups in Suriname primarily comprise theLokono,Kalina,Tiriyó, andWayana.
Most Venezuelans have some degree of Indigenous heritage even if they may not identify as such. The 2011 census estimated that around 52% of the population identified asmestizo. But those who identify as Indigenous, from being raised in those cultures, make up only around 2% of the total population. The Indigenous peoples speak around 29 different languages and many more dialects. As some of the ethnic groups are very small, their native languages are in danger of becoming extinct in the next decades. The most important Indigenous groups are theYe'kuana, theWayuu, theKali'na, theYa̧nomamö, thePemon, and theWarao. The most advanced Indigenous peoples to have lived within the boundaries of present-day Venezuela are thought to have been theTimoto-cuicas, who lived in the Venezuelan Andes. Historians estimate that there were between 350,000 and 500,000 Indigenous inhabitants at the time of Spanish colonization. The most densely populated area was the Andean region (Timoto-cuicas), thanks to their advanced agricultural techniques and ability to produce a surplus of food.
The 1999constitution of Venezuela gives Indigenous peoplesspecial rights, although the vast majority of them still live in very critical conditions of poverty. The government provides primary education in their languages in public schools to some of the largest groups, in efforts to continue the languages.
The Indigenous population of the Caribbean islands consisted of theTaíno of theLucayan Archipelago, theGreater Antilles and the northernLesser Antilles, theKalinago of the Lesser Antilles, theCiguayo andMacorix of parts ofHispaniola, and theGuanahatabey of westernCuba. The overall population suffered the most adverse colonial effects out of all the Indigenous populations in the Americas, as the Kalinago have been reduced to a few islands in the Lesser Antilles such asDominica and the Taíno are culturally extinct, though a large proportion of populations in Greater Antillean islands such asPuerto Rico and Cuba to a lesser extent,[270] possesses degrees of Taíno ancestry. TheCayman Islands were the only island group in the Caribbean to have remained unsettled by Indigenous peoples before the colonial era.[271]
Historically, during the Spanish colonization of the Philippines, the territory was ruled as a province of the Mexico-centeredViceroyalty of New Spain and thus many Mexicans including those of IndgenousAztec andTlaxcalan descent, were sent as colonists there.[272]: Chpt. 6 According to a genetic study by theNational Geographic, Filipinos can trace an average of 2% of their ancestry to Native Americans.[273][274]
Since the late 20th century, Indigenous peoples in the Americas have become more politically active in asserting their treaty rights and expanding their influence. Some have organized to achieve some sort ofself-determination and preservation of their cultures. Organizations such as theCoordinator of Indigenous Organizations of the Amazon River Basin and the Indian Council of South America are examples of movements that are overcoming national borders to reunite Indigenous populations, for instance, those across theAmazon Basin. Similar movements for Indigenous rights can also be seen in Canada and the United States, with movements like theInternational Indian Treaty Council and the accession of native Indigenous groups into theUnrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization.
There has been a recognition of Indigenous movements on an international scale. The membership of theUnited Nations voted to adopt theDeclaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, despite dissent from some of the stronger countries of the Americas.
In Colombia, various Indigenous groups have protested the denial of their rights. People organized a march inCali in October 2008 to demand the government live up to promises to protect Indigenous lands, defend the Indigenous against violence, and reconsider thefree trade pact with the United States.[275]
The first Indigenous candidate to be democratically elected as head of a country in the Americas wasBenito Juárez, aZapotec Mexican who was elected President of Mexico in 1858 and led the country until 1872 and led the country to victory during theSecond French intervention in Mexico.[277]
A schematic illustration of maternal (mtDNA) gene-flow in and out of Beringia, from 25,000 years ago to presentA map showing the origin of the first wave of humans into theAmericas, including the Ancestral Northern Eurasian, which represent a distinct Paleolithic Siberian population, and the Northeast Asians, which are an East Asian-related group. The admixture happened somewhere in NortheastSiberia.[280]Principal component analysis showing the Native American cluster in other Eurasian populations.[281]
Genetic comparisons of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and Y-chromosome of Native Americans to that of certainSiberian andCentral Asian peoples (specifically Paleo-Siberians, Turkic, and historically the Okunev culture) have led Russian researcher I.A. Zakharov to believe that, among all the previously studied Asian peoples, it is "the peoples living betweenAltai andLake Baikal along theSayan mountains that are genetically closest to" Indigenous Americans.[284]
The common occurrence of theAsian mtDNA haplogroupsA,B,C, andD among eastern Asian and Native American populations has been noted.[288] Some subclades of C and D that have been found in the limited populations of Native Americans who have agreed to DNA testing[286][287] bear some resemblance to the C and D subclades in Mongolian,Amur, Japanese, Korean, andAinu populations.[288][289]
Available genetic patterns lead to two main theories of genetic episodes affecting the Indigenous peoples of the Americas; first with the initial peopling of the Americas, and secondly withEuropean colonization of the Americas.[290][291][292] The former is the determinant factor for the number ofgene lineages,zygosity mutations, and foundinghaplotypes present in today's Indigenous peoples of the Americaspopulations.[291]
The most popular theory among anthropologists is theBering Strait theory, of human settlement of theNew World occurring in stages from theBering Sea coastline, with a possible initial layover of 10,000 to 20,000 years inBeringia for the smallfounding population.[293][294][295] Themicro-satellite diversity and distributions of the Y lineage specific to South America indicate that certain Indigenous peoples of the Americas populations have been isolated since the initial colonization of the region.[296] TheNa-Dené,Inuit, andIndigenous populations of Alaska exhibithaplogroup Q (Y-DNA) mutations, however are distinct from other Indigenous peoples of the Americas with various mtDNA and atDNA mutations.[297][298][299] This suggests that the earliest migrants into the northern extremes of North America including Greenland derived from later migrant populations.[300][301]
Multiple recent findings on autosomal DNA and full genome revealed more information about the formation, settlement, and external relationships of the Indigenous peoples of the Americas to other populations. Native Americans are very closely related to thePaleosiberian tribes of Siberia, and to the ancient samples of theMal'ta–Buret' culture (Ancient North Eurasians) as well as to theAncient Beringians. Native Americans also share a relatively higher genetic affinity withEast Asian peoples. Native American genetic ancestry is occasionally dubbed as "Amerindian". This type of ancestry largely overlaps with "Paleosiberian" ancestry but is differentiated from "Neo-Siberian" ancestry, which represents historical expansions from Northeast Asia and is today widespread among Siberian populations. The ancestors of Native Americans used a single migration route, most likely through Beringia, and subsequently populated all of the Americas in a time range between 25,000 and 15,000 years ago. Possible contact between Native Americans and Polynesians dates back to 1,400 years ago. Previously hypothesized "Paleo-Indian" groups turned out to be genetically identical to modern Native Americans. The controversial claim that the first peoples came from Europe via the North Atlantic, based on an ostensible similarity in stone-tool technology between the Solutrean culture of Pleistocene Europe and Clovis in North America, was undermined by the genome of the Anzick Clovis child, which sits squarely on the branch of Ancestral Native American peoples. No ancient or present-day genome (or mtDNA or Y chromosome marker) in the Americas has shown any direct affinities to Upper Palaeolithic European populations.[302][303][304][305][306][307][308][309]
A qpGraph on the formation of Ancient Paleo-Siberians and Native American populations.[310]
The date for the formation of the Indigenous peoples of the Americas gene pool ranges from 36,000 to 25,000 years ago, with their internal diverging being around 21,000 years ago, during the settlement of the Americas.[311] Native Americans formed from the admixture of a lineage that diverged fromAncient East Asian people around 36,000 years ago somewhere inSouthern China, and subsequently migrated northwards into Siberia where they merged with a Paleolithic Siberian population known asAncient North Eurasians (ANE), deeply related to European hunter-gatherers, giving rise to bothIndigenous peoples of Siberia and Ancestral Native Americans. Both Paleo-Siberians and Ancestral Native Americans derive between 32 and 44% of their ancestry from Ancient North Eurasians (ANE), and 56–68% ancestry from Ancient East Asians.[312][313][314][315] Based on a 2023 mitochondrial DNA study, a subsequent wave of migration fromNorthern China, originating near the present-day cities of Beijing and Tianjin, occurred as recently as 9000 BCE, following a previously unknown coastal route from Asia to America.[316]
The following table provides estimates for each country or territory in the Americas of the populations of Indigenous people and those with partial Indigenous ancestry, each expressed as a percentage of the overall population. The total percentage obtained by adding both of these categories is also given.
Note: these categories are inconsistently defined and measured differently from country to country. Some figures are based on the results of population-wide genetic surveys, while others are based on self-identification or observational estimation.
Indigenous populations of the Americas as estimated percentage of total country or territory's population
^ab"Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020: Presentación de resultados"(PDF) (in Spanish). Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. p. 49.Archived(PDF) from the original on 24 January 2022. Retrieved11 October 2024.Note: Indigenous population was identified as the total population in households where the head of the household, his or her spouse or any of their ascendants claimed to speak an Indigenous language.
^ab"Principales resultados del Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020"(PDF) (in Spanish). Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. p. 62.Archived(PDF) from the original on 20 April 2024. Retrieved11 October 2024. It was estimated that 19.4% of population aged 3 years and older recognize themselves as Indigenous.
^"Principales Resultados del Censo 2018" [Main Results of the 2018 Census](PDF) (in Spanish). Instituto Nacional de Estadística. p. 10.Archived(PDF) from the original on 29 April 2021. Retrieved29 April 2021. Sum of people who identify as Maya (6,207,503) and Xinka (264,167).
^ab"Perú: Perfil Sociodemográfico" [Peru: Sociodemographic Profile](PDF) (in Spanish). Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. p. 214.Archived(PDF) from the original on 11 February 2020. Retrieved30 April 2021. Sum of population aged 12 years and older who identify as Quechua (5,176,809), Aimara (548,292), Native or Indigenous from the Amazon (79,266), Ashaninka (55,489), Part of another Indigenous or originary peoples (49,838), Awajun (37,690) and Shipibo Konibo (25,222).
^"Síntesis de Resultados Censo 2017"(PDF) (in Spanish). Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas. p. 16. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 12 June 2024. Retrieved30 April 2021. Excluding Rapa Nui (9,399).
^"Población Indígena de Colombia" [Indigenous Population of Colombia](PDF) (in Spanish). Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística.Archived(PDF) from the original on 18 September 2020. Retrieved1 May 2021.
^"Presentación de Resultados Nacionales" [Presentation of National Results](PDF) (in Spanish). Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos.Archived(PDF) from the original on 31 October 2023. Retrieved30 October 2023.
^"Resultados Población Indígena" [Indigenous Population Results](PDF) (in Spanish). Instituto Nacional de Estadística.Archived(PDF) from the original on 23 November 2018. Retrieved1 May 2021.
^"Población total por grupo poblacional al que pertenece, según total nacional, departamento, área, sexo y grupo de edad" [Total population by population group to which it belongs, according to national total, department, area, sex and age group](XLSX) (in Spanish). Instituto Nacional de Estadística.Archived from the original on 2 May 2021. Retrieved2 May 2021. Sum of people who identify as Maya-Chortí (33,256), Lenca (453,672), Misquito (80,007), Nahua (6,339), Pech (6,024), Tolupán (19,033) and Tawahka (2,690).
^"Resultados – Censo de Poblacion y Vivienda 2005" [Results – Population and Housing Census 2005](PDF) (in Spanish). Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. p. 184.Archived(PDF) from the original on 3 May 2021. Retrieved1 May 2021.
^"Greenland in Figures 2020"(PDF). Statistics Greenland. p. 37.Archived(PDF) from the original on 3 May 2021. Retrieved3 May 2021. Corresponding to "Born in Greenland".
^"2010 Housing and Population Census". The Central Statistical Office of Saint Lucia.Archived from the original on 29 March 2023. Retrieved12 October 2023. To generate the report follow Population and Housing > Basic Characteristics > Person Variables, select Ethnic group and execute.
^"Terminology".Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. Archived fromthe original on 27 October 2009. Retrieved11 November 2009.TheCanadian Constitution recognizes three groups of Aboriginal people – Indians (First Nations), Métis and Inuit. These separate peoples have unique heritages, languages, cultural practices, and spiritual beliefs
^"Terminology of First Nations Native, Aboriginal and Indian"(PDF).the Office of the Aboriginal Advisor for Aboriginals. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 14 July 2010. Retrieved11 November 2009.Native is a word similar in meaning to Aboriginal. Native Peoples or First peoples is a collective term to describe the descendants of the original peoples of North America.
^Chatters, James C.; Potter, Ben A.; Prentiss, Anna Marie; Fiedel, Stuart J.; Haynes, Gary; Kelly, Robert L.; Kilby, J. David; Lanoë, François; Holland-Lulewicz, Jacob; Miller, D. Shane; Morrow, Juliet E.; Perri, Angela R.; Rademaker, Kurt M.; Reuther, Joshua D.; Ritchison, Brandon T.; Sanchez, Guadalupe; Sánchez-Morales, Ismael; Spivey-Faulkner, S. Margaret; Tune, Jesse W.; Haynes, C. Vance (23 October 2021). "Evaluating Claims of Early Human Occupation at Chiquihuite Cave, Mexico".PaleoAmerica.8 (1). Informa UK Limited:1–16.doi:10.1080/20555563.2021.1940441.ISSN2055-5563.S2CID239853925.
^Bryant, Vaughn M. Jr. (1998)."Pre-Clovis". In Guy Gibbon; et al. (eds.).Archaeology of Prehistoric Native America: An Encyclopedia. Garland reference library of the humanities. Vol. 1537. pp. 682–683.ISBN978-0-8153-0725-9.
^Drake, Thomas."1519".English 257: Literature of Western Civilization. University of Idaho.Archived from the original on 27 December 2018. Retrieved26 December 2018.
^Bucholz, Robert."Europe in 1500".University of Hawaii. Archived fromthe original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved26 December 2018.
^abMcKenna, Erin; Pratt, Scott L. (2015).American Philosophy: From Wounded Knee to the Present. London: Bloomsbury. p. 375.ISBN978-1-44118-375-0.
^Denevan, William M. (15 March 1992).The Native Population of the Americas in 1492. Madison, Wis: Univ of Wisconsin Press.ISBN978-0-299-13434-1.
^abcdCurtin, Philip D. (1993). "Disease Exchange Across the Tropical Atlantic".History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences.15 (3):329–356.JSTOR23331729.PMID7529931.
^Martin, Stacie E (2004). "Native Americans". In Shelton, Dinah (ed.).Encyclopedia of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity. Macmillan Library Reference. pp. 740–746.
^abClark, Julie Dorton; Winterowd, Carrie (2012). "Correlates and Predictors of Binge Eating Among Native American Women".Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development.40 (2):117–127.doi:10.1002/j.2161-1912.2012.00011.x.ISSN2161-1912.
^Gill, Richardson Benedict (2000)."5. Famine and Social Dissolution".The Great Maya Droughts: Water, Life, and Death (revised ed.). Albuquerque:University of New Mexico Press (published 2001). p. 123.ISBN978-0-8263-2774-1. Retrieved27 October 2018.In Tenochtitlan, during the famine of 1 Rabbit in 1454, Moctezuma Ilhuicamina distributed food from the royal granaries to the poor. When the stores ran out, he gave permission for the populace to leave the city to find food elsewhere and people left. The populations of Texcoco, Chalco, Xochimilco, and Tepanecapan also fled their cities. The Maya Lowlands appear to have suffered a famine at the same time, and the cities of Chichen Itza, Mayapan, and Uxmal appear to have been all abandoned simultaneously [...].
^Orquera, L.; Piana, E. (1999).La vida material y social de los Yámana [The material and social life of the Yámana] (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Editorial Eudeba. pp. 178–180.
^Di Peso, Charles (1974).Casas Grandes: A Fallen Trading Center of the Gran Chichimeca (Vols. 13). Flagstaff, AZ: Northland Press.
^Di Peso, Charles (1974).Casas Grandes: A Fallen Trading Center of the Gran Chichimeca (Vols. 1–3). Flagstaff, AZ: Northland Press.
^Pearlstein, Ellen; MacKenzie, Mark; Kaplan, Emily; Howe, Ellen; Levinson, Judith (2015). "Tradition and Innovation, Cochineal and Andean keros". In Anderson, Barbara; Padilla, Carmella (eds.).A Red Like No Other: How Cochineal Colored the World. Rizzoli and Museum of International Folk Art, Santa Fe, New Mexico. pp. 44–51.Archived from the original on 14 September 2022. Retrieved29 March 2022.
^"2020: DEC Redistricting Data (PL 94-171)". United States Census Bureau.Archived from the original on 1 November 2023. Retrieved1 November 2023. The American Indian and Alaska Native population of one race was 3.7 million and the two or more races population 5.9 million (excluding Puerto Rico).
^"Primer Censo de Población"(PDF) (in Spanish). Oficina Nacional del Censo de Población. 1 May 1930. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 19 March 2022. Retrieved17 March 2022.
^Rivera Cusicanqui, Silvia (1987).Oppressed but Not Defeated: Peasant Struggles among the Aymara and Qhechwa in Bolivia, 1900–1980. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
^abRodríguez, Diego Andrés Chávez (21 March 2010). "La Autonomía Indígena Originario Campesina: Entre la formalidad y la autodeterminación" [Indigenous Originary Peasant Autonomy: Between formality and self-determination].Diálogos en Democracia (in Spanish). (Supplement toPulso Bolivia).
^"La Bolivia autonómica",Los Tiempos (Cochabamba), edición especial, 6 August 2010
^Marcheco, Beatriz."Cuba Indígena hoy: sus rostros y AND" [Indigenous Cuba today: its faces and DNA] (in Spanish). Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo. p. 75.Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved9 October 2023.
^Go MC, Jones AR, Algee-Hewitt B, Dudzik B, Hughes C (2019)."Classification Trends among Contemporary Filipino Crania Using Fordisc 3.1".Human Biology.2 (4). University of Florida Press:293–303.doi:10.5744/fa.2019.1005.S2CID159266278.Archived from the original on 7 January 2021. Retrieved13 September 2020.[Page 1] ABSTRACT: Filipinos represent a significant contemporary demographic group globally, yet they are underrepresented in the forensic anthropological literature. Given the complex population history of the Philippines, it is important to ensure that traditional methods for assessing the biological profile are appropriate when applied to these peoples. Here we analyze the classification trends of a modern Filipino sample (n = 110) when using the Fordisc 3.1 (FD3) software. We hypothesize that Filipinos represent an admixed population drawn largely from Asian and marginally from European parental gene pools, such that FD3 will classify these individuals morphometrically into reference samples that reflect a range of European admixture, in quantities from small to large. Our results show the greatest classification into Asian reference groups (72.7%), followed by Hispanic (12.7%), Indigenous American (7.3%), African (4.5%), and European (2.7%) groups included in FD3. This general pattern did not change between males and females. Moreover, replacing the raw craniometric values with their shape variables did not significantly alter the trends already observed. These classification trends for Filipino crania provide useful information for casework interpretation in forensic laboratory practice. Our findings can help biological anthropologists to better understand the evolutionary, population historical, and statistical reasons for FD3-generated classifications. The results of our study indicate that ancestry estimation in forensic anthropology would benefit from population-focused research that gives consideration to histories of colonialism and periods of admixture.
^Posth, Cosimo; Nakatsuka, Nathan; Lazaridis, Iosif; Skoglund, Pontus; Mallick, Swapan; Lamnidis, Thiseas C.; Rohland, Nadin; Nägele, Kathrin; Adamski, Nicole; Bertolini, Emilie; Broomandkhoshbacht, Nasreen; Cooper, Alan; Culleton, Brendan J.; Ferraz, Tiago; Ferry, Matthew (15 November 2018)."Reconstructing the Deep Population History of Central and South America".Cell.175 (5): 1185–1197.e22.doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.027.ISSN0092-8674.PMC6327247.PMID30415837.Our finding of no excess allele sharing with non-Native American populations in the ancient samples is also striking as many of these individuals—including those at Lapa do Santo—have a "Paleoamerican" cranial morphology that has been suggested to be evidence of the spread of a substructured population of at least two different Native American source populations from Asia to the Americas (von Cramon-Taubadel et al., 2017). Our finding that early Holocene individuals with such a morphology are consistent with deriving all their ancestry from the same homogeneous ancestral population as other Native Americans extends the finding of Raghavan et al., 2015, who came to a similar conclusion after analyzing Native Americans inferred to have Paleoamerican morphology who lived within the last millennium.
^Willerslev, Eske; Meltzer, David J. (June 2021)."Peopling of the Americas as inferred from ancient genomics".Nature.594 (7863):356–364.Bibcode:2021Natur.594..356W.doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03499-y.ISSN1476-4687.PMID34135521.S2CID235460793.Archived from the original on 12 September 2021. Retrieved15 September 2021.It is now evident that the initial dispersal involved the movement from northeast Asia. The first peoples, once south of the continental ice sheets, spread widely, expanded rapidly, and branched into multiple populations. Their descendants—over the next fifteen millennia—experienced varying degrees of isolation, admixture, continuity and replacement, and their genomes help to illuminate the relationships among major subgroups of Native American populations. Notably, all ancient individuals in the Americas, save for later-arriving Arctic peoples, are more closely related to contemporary Indigenous American individuals than to any other population elsewhere, which challenges the claim—which is based on anatomical evidence—that there was an early, non-Native American population in the Americas.
^Sarkar, Anjali A. (18 June 2021)."Ancient Human Genomes Reveal Peopling of the Americas".GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.Archived from the original on 15 September 2021. Retrieved26 January 2023.The team discovered that the Spirit Cave remains came from a Native American while dismissing a longstanding theory that a group called Paleoamericans existed in North America before Native Americans.
^Bonilla, Carolina;Shriver, Mark D.; Parra, Esteban J.; Jones, Alfredo; Fernández, José R. (2004). "Ancestral proportions and their association with skin pigmentation and bone mineral density in Puerto Rican women from New York City".Human Genetics.115 (1):57–58.doi:10.1007/s00439-004-1125-7.PMID15118905.
^"Perú: Perfil Sociodemográfico" [Peru: Sociodemographic Profile](PDF).Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (in Spanish). p. 214.Archived(PDF) from the original on 11 February 2020. Retrieved22 September 2018.
Barnes, Ian (2015).The Historical Atlas of Native Americans. New York: Chartwell Books.ISBN978-0-7858-3145-7.
Cappel, Constance (2007).The Smallpox Genocide of the Odawa Tribe atL'Arbre Croche, 1763: The History of a Native American People. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.ISBN978-0-7734-5220-6.OCLC175217515.
Dean, Bartholomew (2002). "State Power and Indigenous Peoples in Peruvian Amazonia: A Lost Decade, 1990–2000". InMaybury-Lewis, David (ed.).The Politics of Ethnicity: Indigenous Peoples in Latin American States. David Rockefeller Center series on Latin American studies, Harvard University. Vol. 9. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University/David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies. pp. 199–238.ISBN978-0-674-00964-6.OCLC427474742.
Josephy, Alvin M. Jr. (1995).500 Nations: An Illustrated History of North American Indians. London: Hutchinson/Pimlico.ISBN0-09-179148-0.
Kane, Katie (1999). "Nits Make Lice: Drogheda, Sand Creek, and the Poetics of Colonial Extermination".Cultural Critique.42 (42):81–103.doi:10.2307/1354592.ISSN0882-4371.JSTOR1354592.
König, Eva (2002).Indianer 1858–1928, Photographische Reisen von Alaska bis Feuerland. Museum für Volkerkunde Hamburg: Edition Braus.ISBN978-3-89904-021-0.
Gaskins, S. (1999). "Children's daily lives in a Mayan village: A case study of culturally constructed roles and activities".Children's Engagement in the World: Sociocultural Perspectives:25–61.
Woodhead, M. (1998). Children's perspectives on their working lives: A participatory study in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, the Philippines, Guatemala, El Salvador and Nicaragua.
_2007.jpg)
_-_49503469491.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_(cropped).jpg)
.jpg)
.svg)
