 Imperatritsa Mariya | |
| Class overview | |
|---|---|
| Builders |
|
| Operators | |
| Preceded by | Gangut-class battleship |
| Succeeded by | Imperator Nikolai I |
| Subclasses | Imperatritsa Ekaterina Velikaya |
| Built | 1912–1917 |
| In commission | 1915–1920 |
| Planned | 3 |
| Completed | 3 |
| Lost | 2 |
| Scrapped | 1 |
| General characteristics | |
| Type | Dreadnought |
| Displacement | 23,413long tons (23,789 t) |
| Length | 168 m (551 ft 2 in) |
| Beam | 27.43 m (90 ft) |
| Draft | 8.36 m (27 ft 5 in) |
| Installed power |
|
| Propulsion | 4 shafts; 4 gearedsteam turbines |
| Speed | 21knots (39 km/h; 24 mph) |
| Range | 1,640nautical miles (3,037 km; 1,887 mi) at 21 knots (39 km/h; 24 mph) |
| Complement | 1,154–1,213 |
| Armament |
|
| Armor |
|
TheImperatritsa Mariya-class (Russian:Императрица Мария)battleships were the firstdreadnoughts built for theBlack Sea Fleet of theImperial Russian Navy. All three ships were built inNikolayev duringWorld War I; two of the ships were built by theRossud Dockyard and the third was built by theAssociated Factories and Shipyards of Nikolayev (Russian:ONZiV). Two ships were delivered in 1915 and saw some combat againstex-German warships that had been 'gifted' to theOttoman Empire, but the third was not completed until 1917 and saw no combat due to the disorder in the navy after theFebruary Revolution earlier that year.
Imperatritsa Mariya was sunk by amagazine explosion inSevastopol harbor in 1916.Imperatritsa Ekaterina Velikaya, having been renamedSvobodnaya Rossiya in 1917, was scuttled inNovorossiysk harbor in 1918 to prevent her from being turned over to the Germans as required by theTreaty of Brest-Litovsk. The crew ofVolia, asImperator Aleksandr III had been renamed in 1917, voted to turn her over to the Germans. They were only able to make one training cruise before they had to turn her over the victoriousAllies in 1918 as part of the armistice terms. The British took control of her, but turned her over to theWhite Russians in 1920 who renamed herGeneral Alekseyev. She only had one operable gun turret by this time and she provided some fire support for the Whites, but it was not enough. They were forced to evacuate theCrimea later that year and sailed withWrangel's fleet toBizerte (Tunisia) where she was interned by theFrench. She was eventuallyscrapped there during the 1930s to pay her docking fees.
The Naval Ministry began planning a class of dreadnoughts for theBlack Sea Fleet in 1910 when they learned that the Ottomans were on the verge of ordering dreadnoughts of their own from the British. This rumor proved to false, but the Russians had decided that they should continue the design process for the time when the Ottomans did procure dreadnoughts of their own. Preliminary specifications were issued on 12 August 1910[Note 1] for a design based on that of theGangut-class battleships then being built for theBaltic Fleet. 23knots (43 km/h; 26 mph) was thought to be excessive in the confined environs of theBlack Sea so the new design was capable of only 21 knots (39 km/h; 24 mph) which allowed more weight to be devoted to more guns or heavier armor. A main armament of a dozen 12-inch (305 mm) guns in four triple turrets was specified in the same 'linear'non-superfiring arrangements as theGanguts. The sixteen 120-millimeter (4.7 in) anti-torpedo boat guns of theGanguts were replaced by twenty 130-millimeter (5.1 in)/55 B7 Pattern 1913 guns to counter the ever-increasing size of torpedo boats. The maximum elevation of the 12-inch guns was to be increased to 35°, 10° more than in theGangut-class ships, and turret armor was to be increased from 200 mm (7.9 in) to 250 mm (9.8 in).[1]
A design competition was announced in July 1911, but there were not many contenders. The Naval Ministry favored the design from theRussud Works and gave preliminary orders for three ships on 2 September, even before the competition was concluded in November. Russud's design was unsurprisingly selected and the government transferred designers from the government-ownedBaltic Works as well as a complete set of drawings for theGangut-class to speed up the detailed design process.[2]
The ships of theImperatritsa Mariya-class were 168 meters (551 ft 2 in) longoverall, had abeam of 27.43 meters (90 ft 0 in) and at full load adraft of 8.36 meters (27 ft 5 in). They displaced 23,413long tons (23,789 t) at (standard).High-tensile steel was used throughout the hull with mild steel used only in areas that did not contribute to structural strength. The hull was subdivided by 18 transverse watertightbulkheads. The engine room was divided by two longitudinal bulkheads and adouble bottom was provided. Their designedmetacentric height was 1.76 meters (5 ft 9 in).[3]
Imperatritsa Ekaterina Velikaya was slightly larger than herhalf-sisters becauseONZiV enlarged her in an effort to counter the usual problem Russian battleships had with weight. She was 168 meters (551 ft 2 in) long at the waterline and had a beam of 28.07 meters (92 ft 1 in); 4 feet 10 inches (1.47 m) longer and 2 feet (0.61 m) wider than her half sisters. Her exact draft is not known, but she had a draft of 8.7 meters (28 ft 7 in) on trials. Her displacement was 24,644 long tons (25,039 t) at load, over 900 long tons (914 t) more than her designed displacement of 23,783 long tons (24,165 t).[4]
Imperatritsa Mariya proved to be very bow-heavy in service and tended to ship large amounts of water through her forward casemates.[5] The ammunition for the forward 12-inch guns was reduced from 100 to 70 rounds each while the 130 mm ammunition was reduced from 245 to 100 rounds per gun in an attempt to compensate for her trim. This did not fully cure the problem, butImperatritsa Mariya was lost before any other changes could be implemented. This did not fully cure the problem soVolia's, as she was known by then, forward pair of 130 mm guns were removed while she was fitting out.Imperatritsa Ekaterina Velikaya did not suffer from the same degree of trim by the bow by virtue of her greater size and retained her forward guns.[6]
The two Russud-built ships were fitted with fourParsons-type steam turbines imported fromJohn Brown & Company of theUnited Kingdom whileImperatritsa Ekaterina Velikaya's turbines were built by ONZiV with technical assistance fromVickers Limited. They were designed for a total of 26,000shaft horsepower (19,388 kW) (27,000 shp (20,134 kW) inImperatritsa Ekaterina Velikaya), but produced over 33,000 shp (24,608 kW) on trials. 20 mixed-firing triangularYarrowwater-tube boilers powered the turbines at a working pressure of 17.5 atm (1,773 kPa; 257 psi). Their designed speed was 21 knots. Their maximum coal capacity ranged from 1,700 to 2,300 long tons (1,727 to 2,337 t) plus 420 to 630 long tons (427 to 640 t) offuel oil which gave them a range of approximately 1,640 nautical miles (3,037 km; 1,887 mi) at full speed or 2,960 nautical miles (5,482 km; 3,406 mi) at economical speed. All of their electrical power was generated by three main Curtis 360 kilowattturbo generators and two 200 kilowatt auxiliary units.[7]
The main armament of theImperatritsa Mariya-class consisted of a dozenObukhovskii 12-inch (305 mm) Pattern 1907 52-caliber guns mounted in four triple turrets distributed the length of the ship. The guns were identical to those used in theGangut-class ships, but the turrets were of a new and roomier design. The fore and aft turrets could traverse a total of 310° while the middle turrets covered an arc of 130° on each side.[8] The guns could be depressed to −5° and elevated to 25° and could be loaded at any angle between −5° and +15°; their rate of fire was supposed to three rounds per minute up to 15° of elevation. The turrets could elevate at 3–4° per second and traverse at a rate of 3.2° per second. 100 rounds per gun were carried at full load. The guns fired 470.9-kilogram (1,038 lb) projectiles at amuzzle velocity of 762 m/s (2,500 ft/s); this provided a maximum range of 23,230 meters (25,400 yd).[9]
The secondary armament consisted of twenty 130-millimeter (5.1 in)/55-caliber B7 Pattern 1913 guns mounted incasemates. They were arranged in two groups, six guns per side from the forward turret to the rear funnel and the remaining four clustered around the rear turret. Three guns per side were situated to fire ahead as that was the most likely direction of attack by torpedo boats as anticipated by the Naval General Staff.[10] Their rate of fire ranged from five to eight rounds per minute and they were provided with 245 rounds per gun. They had a maximum range of about 15,364 meters (16,802 yd) with a 36.86-kilogram (81.3 lb) shell at a muzzle velocity of 823 m/s (2,700 ft/s).[11]
Noanti-aircraft (AA) armament was originally planned. In October 1916, the Naval Ministry specified that four 37-caliber 4-inch (102 mm) guns of a new design were to be fitted, but they never entered service. The two older ships had three or four 50-caliber75-millimeter (3 in) Pattern 1892 guns mounted on turret roofs.[12] The 75 mm gun had maximum elevation of 50°. It fired a 12.63-pound (5.73 kg) shell at a muzzle velocity of 2,450 ft/s (750 m/s) at a rate of fire of 12–15 rounds per minute. It had a maximum ceiling of less than 16,000 ft (4,900 m).[13]Volia used four of the newer 30-caliber76.2-millimeter (3 in) 'Lender' AA guns, mounted on the fore and aft turrets. This had a maximum depression of 5° and a maximum elevation of 65°. It fired a 14.33-pound (6.50 kg) shell at a muzzle velocity of 1,929 ft/s (588 m/s). It had a rate of fire of 10–12 rounds per minute and had a maximum ceiling of 19,000 ft (5,800 m).[14]
Four underwater 17.7-inch (450 mm)torpedo tubes were also fitted, two on eachbroadside in a compartment immediately abaft the forwardmagazine.[12]Imperatritsa Mariya's trials revealed problems with her magazine cooling systems where the heat generated by the ventilation system mostly negated the cooling effects of the refrigeration system. Her sisters shared this problem, which may have contributed to the magazine fire suffered byImperatritsa Mariya that led to her loss in 1916.[15]
The two older ships mountedZeiss 5-meter (16 ft 5 in)rangefinders on each conning tower, butVolia was given four 18-foot (5.5 m)Barr and Stroud rangefinders, one for each turret.[12] These would provide data for the central artillery post to calculate, using the standard Geisler mechanical computer, and then transmit to the guns for the gun crew to follow.[16]
The full-scale armor trials with thehulk of the oldpre-dreadnought battleshipChesma greatly affected the armor protection of theImperatritsa Mariya-class ships. TheKrupp cemented armor plates were sized to match the frames to provide support for their joints and they were locked together by a type ofmortise and tenon joint to better distribute the shock of a shell's impact. Thewaterline belt had a maximum thickness of 262.5 millimeters (10.33 in). It was continued forward and aft of the citadel by plates 217 millimeters (8.5 in) and 175 millimeters (6.9 in) thick. These reduced to 125 millimeters (4.9 in) and then to 75 millimeters just before the bow. Aft the belt thinned to 125 millimeters all the way to the stern. It had a total height of 5.25 meters (17.2 ft), 3.5 meters (11 ft) of which was above the design waterline and 1.75 meters (5 ft 9 in) below. It was backed by 75 millimeters of wood to make a better fit between the hull and the armor. The forward end of the citadel was protected by other armor and the transverse bulkhead was therefore only 25.4 millimeters (1.00 in) thick, barely enough to consider as splinter protection. However, the rear bulkhead had no other protection and was 100 millimeters (3.9 in) thick. These thin bulkheads left the end magazines very vulnerable to shells fired from bearings in front of or behind the ship. The upper belt was 100 millimeters (3.9 in) thick and had a height of 2.7 millimeters (0.11 in). It thinned to 75 mm forward of the casemates all the way to the bow. The casemates were also protected by a 25 millimeters (0.98 in) transverse bulkhead from axial fire as well as a 25 mm screen between each casemate. Behind the side armor was an inboard longitudinal splinter bulkhead that was 50 millimeters (2.0 in) thick, but the casemates had their own separate 25 mm splinter bulkhead.[17]
The main gun turrets had sides 250 millimeters (9.8 in) thick with 125 mm roofs. 50 mm plates protected the gun ports and 25-millimeter (0.98 in) bulkheads separated each gun. The barbettes were 250 mm thick, but reduced to 125 mm below the upper deck, except in the forward and rear turrets which thinned only to 150 millimeters (5.9 in). The forward conning tower sides were 300 millimeters (11.8 in) thick with a 200 millimeters (7.9 in) roof and 250 mm supporting tube which reduced to 100 mm below the upper deck. The rear conning tower also had 300 mm sides and a 250 mm support tube, but the roof was only 100 mm thick. The funnel uptakes were protected by 75 mm of armor above the upper deck, but this reduced to 19 millimeters (0.75 in) below it. The upperdeck was 37.5 millimeters (1.48 in) thick while the middle deck was 25 mm thick over the armored citadel. Outside the citadel the middle deck was 37.5 mm thick and the lower deck was 25 mm thick. Underwater protection was minimal as there was only an unarmored watertight bulkhead behind the upwards extension of the double bottom.[17]
All three ships were laid down on 30 October 1911, but this was just a ceremonial event as the design had not yet been finalized nor the contracts signed. A contract was finally signed on 13 April 1912 with Russud that specified delivery dates of 2 September 1915 for bothImperatritsa Mariya andImperator Aleksander III.Imperatritsa Ekaterina Velikaya was built to a larger design that added over two million goldrubles to her cost and delayed the start of her construction three months after her half-sisters. Despite the demanding schedule the ships suffered from a number of delays during construction. On 10 February 1914 changes were ordered by the Naval Ministry to incorporate the lessons learned from the full-scale armor trials conducted using theChesma. This added almost 500 long tons (508 t) of weight to the ships and raised their cost by 220,000–250,000 rubles. Other delays were incurred after the war began as imported components took longer to reach the shipyards and factories switched over to war production. The construction ofImperator Aleksander III was deliberately delayed in order to accelerate the completion of her two sisters and some of her turrets were transferred toImperatritsa Mariya as well.[18]
Imperatritsa Mariya (Russian:Императрица Мария, "Empress Maria") was launched on 19 October 1913 and arrived in Sevastopol on 13 July 1915, where she completed her fitting out during the next few months and conductedsea trials. She provided cover while the pre-dreadnought battleships conducted shore bombardment missions in October 1915. She encountered the ex-Germanlight cruiserMidilli twice during 1916, but the cruiser escaped with nothing more than splinter damage.[19] On 20 October 1916, shecapsized and sank inSevastopol harbor after a magazine fire and subsequent explosion. Following a complex salvage operation, she was eventually raised and placed in drydock in May 1918. However, in the chaos of theRussian Revolution and subsequentCivil War, no further repair work was done, and the ship was scrapped beginning in 1926.[20] Her guns and their turrets, which had fallen out of the ship when she capsized, were later salvaged in 1931–1933. Two of the guns were used in the 30th Coast Defense Battery defending Sevastopol duringWorld War II, also known asMaksim Gor'kii I by the Germans.[21]
Imperatritsa Ekaterina Velikaya (Russian:Императрица Екатерина Великая, "Empress Catherine the Great") was launched on 6 June 1914 and completed on 18 October 1915. She was originally namedEkaterina II until 27 June 1915 and was renamedSvobodnaya Rossiya (Russian:Free Russia) in 1917. She engaged the German battlecruiserSMSGoeben while the latter was in Turkish service asYavuz Sultan Selim only once, but failed to inflict anything more severe than splinter damage. She also encounteredMidilli on 16 April 1916, but the cruiser used her higher speed to escape. She was scuttled on 18 June 1918 inNovorossiysk to prevent her from being turned over to the Germans as required by theTreaty of Brest-Litovsk. No attempt was made to salvage her during the 1920s, but the 12-inch shells were salvaged from her wreck until a magazine explosion was triggered in 1930 by the explosive charges used to gain access to the shells.[22]
Imperator Aleksander III (Russian:Император Александр Третий, Emperor Alexander III) was launched on 2 April 1914, renamedVolya (Ukrainian:Воля—Freedom) in 1917 and thenGeneral Alekseyev (Russian:Генерал Алексеев) in 1920. The ship did not take part in operations during World War I due to long delays in the delivery of its machinery from Britain, but was able to go to sea by 1917 and conduct a series of trials. On 1 May 1918 she sailed from Sevastopol to Novorossiysk to avoid capture by advancing German troops. While at Novorossiysk she received an order to scuttle on 19 June 1918, but the majority of the crew refused to do so and decided to return to Sevastopol. Upon arrival she was disarmed and only guards were left on board, but the Germans took control on 1 October. She made a brief cruise with a German crew on 15 October, but her guns were still inoperable. After Germany's surrender she was turned over to the British, who moved her toİzmit inTurkey. In 1919 the British brought her back to the Black Sea and turned her over to theWhite Russian forces, where she fought in the Russian Civil War against theRed Army, mainly carrying out shore bombardments. With the collapse of the White Russian armies in Southern Russia in 1920, the battleship assisted in their evacuation toFrench-ownedTunisia, where she was interned inBizerte. She was eventually scrapped there to pay her docking fees.[23]
The French stored her guns and later donated them to theFinns during theWinter War, although they did not arrive until after the end of the war. The Germans captured four of these 12-inch and some 130 mm guns in transit inNarvik harbor when they invadedNorway in April 1940. Both the Finns and Germans used these guns ascoastal artillery. The Germans emplaced all four guns, after rebuilding them to accept German ammunition, in armored turrets in 'Batterie Mirus' onGuernsey. The Finns used three of the 12-inch guns to repairrailway guns that had fallen into their hands in 1941. They were used throughout theContinuation War and the Finns were forced in 1944 to surrender them to the Soviets who used them until the 1990s.[24]
