Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Impact winter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hypothesized climate effects due to an asteroid or comet impact on Earth
For the episode ofThe West Wing, seeImpact Winter (The West Wing).
Artistic impression of an asteroid slamming into tropical, shallow seas of the sulfur-richYucatán Peninsula in what is todaySoutheast Mexico. The aftermath of this immense asteroid collision, which occurred approximately 66 million years ago, is believed to have causedthe mass extinction of non-aviandinosaurs and many other species on Earth. The impact spewed hundreds of billions of tons of sulfur into the atmosphere, producing a worldwide blackout and freezing temperatures which persisted for at least a decade.[1]

Animpact winter is a hypothesized period ofprolonged cold weather due to the impact of a largeasteroid orcomet on theEarth's surface. If an asteroid were to strike land or a shallow body of water, it would eject an enormous amount of dust, ash, and other material into theatmosphere, blocking theradiation from theSun. This would cause the global temperature to decrease drastically.[quantify][2][3] If an asteroid or comet with the diameter of about 5 km (3.1 mi) or more were to hit in a large deep body of water or explode before hitting the surface, there would still be an enormous amount of debris ejected into the atmosphere.[2][3][4] It has been proposed that an impact winter could lead tomass extinction, wiping out many of the world's existing species. TheCretaceous–Paleogene extinction event probably involved an impact winter, and led to mass extinction of mosttetrapods weighing more than 25 kilograms (55 pounds).[5]

Possibility of impact

[edit]

Each year, the Earth is hit by 5 m (16 ft) diametermeteoroids that deliver an explosion 50 km (31 mi) above the surface with the power equivalent of one kiloton of TNT.[6] The Earth is hit every day by ameteor less than 5 m (16 ft) in diameter that disintegrates before reaching the surface. The meteors that do make it to the surface tend to strike unpopulated areas and cause no harm. A human is more likely to die in a fire, flood, or other natural disaster than to die because of an asteroid or comet impact.[2] Another study in 1994 found a 1-in-10,000 chance that the Earth will be hit by a largeasteroid orcomet with a diameter of about 2 km (1.2 mi) during the next century. This object would be capable of disrupting theecosphere and would kill a large fraction of the world's population.[2] One such object,Asteroid 1950 DA, currently has a 0.038% chance of colliding with Earth in the year 2880,[7] though when first discovered the probability was 0.3%.[6] The probability goes down as orbits are refined with additional measurements.

Over 300 short-periodcomets pass near larger planets, such asSaturn andJupiter, which can change the comets' trajectories and could potentially put them into an Earth-crossing orbit. This could happen for long-period comets also but the chance is highest for short-period comets. The chance of these directly impacting Earth is far lower than anear-Earth object (NEO) impact.Victor Clube andBill Napier support a controversial theory that a short-period comet in an Earth-crossing orbit does not need to impact to be hazardous, as it could disintegrate and cause a dust veil with possibilities of a "nuclear winter" scenario with long-term global cooling lasting for thousands of years (which they consider to be similar in probability to a 1 km impact).[8][9][10][11]

Necessary impact factors

[edit]

The Earth experiences a never-ending barrage of cosmic debris. Small particles burn up as they enter theatmosphere and are visible asmeteors. Many of them go unnoticed by the average person even though not all of them burn up before they hit the Earth's surface. Those that strike the surface are known asmeteorites.[4] Thus, not every object that hits the Earth will cause anextinction-level event or even cause any real harm. Objects release most of theirkinetic energy in theatmosphere and will explode if they experience a column ofatmosphere greater than or equal to theirmass.[2] Extinction-level impacts on the Earth occur about every 100 million years.[3][4][12] Although extinction events happen very rarely, large projectiles can do severe damage.[2][12] This section will discuss the nature of the hazards posed by projectiles as a function of their size and composition.

Size

[edit]

A largeasteroid orcomet could collide with the Earth's surface with the force of hundreds to thousands of times the force of all thenuclear bombs on the Earth.[4] For example, the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event has been proposed to have caused extinction of all non-avian dinosaurs 66 million years ago. Early estimates of thisasteroid's size put it at about 10 km (6.2 mi) in diameter. This means it hit with nearly a force of 100,000,000 MT (418 ZJ).[13] That is over six billion times larger than the atomic bomb yield (16 kilotons, 67 TJ) that was dropped onHiroshima during WW2. This impactor excavated theChicxulub crater that is 180 km (110 mi) in diameter. With an object this size, dust and debris would still be ejected into theatmosphere even if it hit the ocean, which is only 4 km (2.5 mi) deep.[3] Anasteroid,meteor, orcomet would remain intact through theatmosphere by virtue of its sheer mass. However, an object smaller than 3 km (1.9 mi) would have to have a strongiron composition to breach thelower atmosphere - thetroposphere or the lower levels of thestratosphere.[2]

Composition

[edit]

There are three different composition types for an asteroid or comet:metallic,stony andicy. The composition of the object determines whether or not it will make it to the Earth's surface in one piece, disintegrate before breaching the atmosphere, or break up and explode just before reaching the surface.[2][4] A metallic object tends to be made up of iron andnickel alloys.[2] These metallic objects are the most likely to impact the surface because they stand up better to the stresses ofram pressure inducedflattening and fragmentation duringdeceleration in the atmosphere.[2] The stony objects, like chondritic meteorites, tend to burn, break up, or explode before leaving the upper atmosphere. Those that do make it to the surface need a minimum energy of about 10 Mt (4×1016 J) or about 50 m (160 ft) diameter to breach thelower atmosphere (this is for a stony object hitting at 20 kilometres per second (40,000 mph)). The porous comet-like objects are made up oflow-density silicates,organics, ice,volatile and often burn up in theupper atmosphere because of theirlow bulk density (≤1 g/cm3 (60 lb/cu ft)).[2]

Possible mechanisms

[edit]
See also:Younger Dryas impact hypothesis

Although theasteroids andcomets that impact the Earth hit with many times the explosive force of avolcano, the mechanisms of an impact winter are similar to those that occur after a mega-volcanic eruption-inducedvolcanic winter. In this scenario massive amounts of debris injected into theatmosphere would block some of theSun's radiation for an extended period of time and lower the mean global temperature by as much as 20 °C after a year.[3] The two main mechanisms that could lead to an impact winter are mass ejection ofregolith and multiplefirestorms.

Mass ejection of regolith

[edit]
See also:Supervolcano,Toba catastrophe theory, andYellowstone caldera § Hazards
This diagram shows the size distribution in micrometres of various types of atmosphericparticulate matter.

In a study conducted by Curt Covey et al., it was found that anasteroid about 10 km (6.2 mi) in diameter with theexplosive force of about 108 MT could send upward of about 2.5x1015 kg of 1 μm sizedaerosol particles into theatmosphere. Anything larger would fall quickly back to the surface.[3] These particles would then be spread throughout the atmosphere and absorb orrefract the sunlight before it is able to reach the surface, cooling the planet in a similar fashion as thesulfurous aerosol rising from amegavolcano, producing deepglobal dimming.[3][14] This iscontroversially purported to have occurred following theToba eruption.

These pulverized rock particles would remain in theatmosphere untildry deposition and due to their size, they would also act ascloud condensation nuclei and would be washed out bywet deposition/precipitation, but even then, about 15% of thesun's radiation might not reach the surface.[why?] After the first 20 days, the land temperature might drop quickly, by about 13 °C. After about a year, the temperature could rebound by about 6 °C, but by this time about one-third of the Northern Hemisphere might be covered in ice.[3]

However, this effect could be largely mitigated, even reversed, by a release of enormous quantities of water vapor and carbon dioxide caused by the initial global heat pulse after the impact. If the asteroid hit an ocean (which would be the case with the majority of impact events), water vapor would form the majority of any ejected matter, and would likely result in a majorgreenhouse effect and a net increase in temperature.[citation needed]

If the impact event is sufficiently energetic it might causemantle plume (volcanism) at theantipodal point (the opposite side of the world).[15] This volcanism could alone therefore create avolcanic winter, irrespective of the other impact effects.

Multiple firestorms

[edit]
See also:Nuclear winter

In combination with the initial debris ejected into theatmosphere, if the impactor is extremely large (3 km (1.9 mi) or more), like at the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event (estimated 10 km (6.2 mi)), there might be the ignition of multiplefire storms, possibly with a global reach into every dense and therefore firestorm-prone forest. These wood fires might release enough amounts of water vapor, ash, soot, tar and carbon dioxide into the atmosphere toperturb the climate on their own and cause the pulverized rock dust cloud blocking the sun to last longer. Alternatively it could cause it to last for a much shorter time, as there would be more water vapor for the rocky aerosol particles to formcloud condensation nuclei. If it causes the dust cloud to last longer, it would prolong the Earth's cooling time, possibly causing thicker ice sheets to form.[3][14]

Past events

[edit]
Main articles:Chicxulub crater andCretaceous–Paleogene extinction event

In 2016, a scientific drilling project drilled deep into thepeak ring of the Chicxulub impact crater to obtainrock core samples from the impact itself. This crater is one of the best known impact craters and was the impact responsible for the extinction of the non-aviandinosaurs.

The discoveries were widely seen as confirming current theories related to both the crater impact and its effects. They confirmed that the rock comprising the peak ring had been subjected to immense pressures and forces, and had been melted by immense heat and shocked by immense pressure from its usual state into its present form in just minutes. The fact that the peak ring was made of granite was also significant, since granite is not a rock found in sea-floor deposits – it originates much deeper in the earth and had been ejected to the surface by the immense pressures of impact.Gypsum, asulfate-containing rock thatis usually present in the shallow seabed of the region, had been almost entirely removed and must therefore have been almost entirely vaporized and entered the atmosphere, and that the event was immediately followed by a hugemegatsunami (a massive movement of sea waters) sufficient to lay down the largest known layer of sand separated by grain size directly above the peak ring.

These strongly support the hypothesis that the impactor was large enough to create a 120-mile peak ring, eject molten granite from deep within the earth, create colossal water movements, and eject an immense quantity of vaporized rock and sulfates into the atmosphere, where they would have persisted for a long time. This global dispersion of dust and sulfates would have led to a sudden and catastrophic effect on the climate worldwide by causing large temperature drops, devastating thefood chain.[16][17]

Impact on humans

[edit]
Artist's impression of theToba eruption, circa 74,000 years ago. Some scientists believe this eruption led to a population collapse and subsequentgenetic bottleneck in humans.[18]

An impact winter would have a devastating effect on humans, as well as the other species on Earth. With thesun's radiation being severely diminished, the first species to die would be plants and animals who survive through the process ofphotosynthesis. This lack of food would ultimately lead to other mass extinctions of other animals that are higher up on thefood chain and possibly kill up to 25% of the human population.[6] Depending on location and size of the initial impact, the cost of clean-up efforts could be so high as to cause aneconomic crisis for the survivors.[19] These factors would make life on Earth, for humans, extremely difficult.

Agriculture

[edit]
See also:Svalbard seedbank

With theEarth's atmosphere full of dust and other material,radiation from the sun would be refracted and scattered back into space and absorbed by this debris. The first effect on the Earth, after theblast wave and potential multiplefire storms, would be the death of most, if not all, of thephotosynthetic life forms on Earth. Those in the ocean that survive would possibly become dormant until the sun came out again.[3][6] Those on land could possibly be kept alive in undergroundmicroclimates, with one such example being theZbrašov aragonite caves. Greenhouses in underground complexes with fossil or nuclear energy power stations could conceivably keep artificial sunlightgrowing lamps on until the atmosphere began to clear. Meanwhile, those outside that were not killed by the lack of sunlight would most likely be killed or kept dormant by the extreme cold of the impact winter. This death of plants might lead to a long period offamine if enough people survived the initial blast wave and would result in increased food costs in undeveloped countries only a few months after the first crop failures. Developed countries wouldn't encounterfamine unless the cooling event was to last longer than a year, due to largercanned food andgrain stockpiles in these countries. However, if the impactor was similar in size to the K/T boundary impactor, agricultural losses might not be compensated with imports to the northern hemisphere from the southern hemisphere or vice versa.[6][19] The only way to keep from starving would be for each country to amass at least a year's worth of food for their people. Not many countries have this; the world's average cereal stock levels are only about 30% of the yearly production.[6][20]

Economics

[edit]

The cost to clean up after an asteroid or comet impact would cost billions to trillions of dollars, depending on the location impacted.[19][20] An impact inNew York City (the 16th most populated city in the world) could cost billions of dollars in financial losses and it could take years for the financial sector (i.e.stock market) to recover.[19] However, the probability of such a naturally specifically aimed impact would be exceedingly low.

Survivability

[edit]
See also:Asteroid impact avoidance,Duck and cover, andCivil defense

As of February 20, 2018[update], there are 17,841near-Earth objects known. 8,059 potentially hazardous objects are known; they are larger than 140 m (460 ft) and may approach the Earth closer than 20 times the distance to theMoon.[6] 888 NEAs larger than 1 km have been discovered,[21] or 96.5% of an estimated total of about 920.[22]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Osterloff, Emily (2018)."How an asteroid ended the age of the dinosaurs".London:Natural History Museum.Archived from the original on 26 April 2022. Retrieved18 May 2022.
  2. ^abcdefghijkCHAPMAN, CR; MORRISON, D. (1994),"Impacts on the Earth by Asteroids and Comets - Assessing the Hazard"(PDF),Nature,367 (6458):33–40,Bibcode:1994Natur.367...33C,doi:10.1038/367033a0,S2CID 4305299
  3. ^abcdefghijMACCRACKEN, MC; Covey, C.; Thompson, S.L.; Weissman, P.R. (1994), "Global Climatic Effects of Atmospheric Dust from An Asteroid or Comet Impact on Earth",Global and Planetary Change,9 (3–4):263–273,Bibcode:1994GPC.....9..263C,doi:10.1016/0921-8181(94)90020-5
  4. ^abcdeLewis, John S. (1997),Rain Of Iron And Ice: The Very Real Threat Of Comet And Asteroid Bombardment, Helix Books,ISBN 978-0-201-48950-7
  5. ^Muench, David; Muench, Marc; Gilders, Michelle A. (2000).Primal Forces. Portland, Oregon: Graphic Arts Center Publishing. p. 20.ISBN 978-1-55868-522-2.
  6. ^abcdefgEngvild, Kjeld C. (2003), "A Review of the Risks of Sudden Global Cooling and Its Effects on Agriculture",Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,115 (3–4):127–137,Bibcode:2003AgFM..115..127E,doi:10.1016/s0168-1923(02)00253-8
  7. ^"Sentry Risk Table". NASA/JPL Near-Earth Object Program Office. 9 December 2014. Archived fromthe original on December 31, 2014. Retrieved2014-12-10.
  8. ^"Was a giant comet responsible for a North American catastrophe in 11,000 BC?".Science Daily. 1 April 2010. Retrieved5 November 2014.
  9. ^Roach, John (7 April 2010)."Comet "Shower" Killed Ice Age Mammals?". National Geographic. Archived fromthe original on April 10, 2010. Retrieved5 November 2014.
  10. ^Hecht, John (2 April 2010)."Did a comet swarm strike America 13,000 years ago?".New Scientist. Retrieved5 November 2014.
  11. ^Jenniskens, Petrus Matheus Marie (2006).Meteor Showers and Their Parent Comets.Cambridge University Press. p. 455.ISBN 978-0521853491.
  12. ^abCovey, C; Morrison, D.; Toon, O.B.; Turco, R.P.; Zahnle, K. (1997), "Environmental Perturbations Caused By the Impacts of Asteroids and Comets",Reviews of Geophysics,35 (1):41–78,Bibcode:1997RvGeo..35...41T,doi:10.1029/96rg03038
  13. ^Alvarez, L.W.; Alvarez, W.; Asaro, F.; Michel, H. V. (1980). "Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction".Science.208 (4448):1095–1108.Bibcode:1980Sci...208.1095A.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.126.8496.doi:10.1126/science.208.4448.1095.PMID 17783054.S2CID 16017767.
  14. ^abBains, KH; Ianov, BA; Ocampo, AC; Pope, KO (1994), "Impact Winter and the Cretaceous-Tertiary Extinctions - Results Of A Chicxulub Asteroid Impact Model",Earth and Planetary Science Letters,128 (3–4):719–725,Bibcode:1994E&PSL.128..719P,doi:10.1016/0012-821x(94)90186-4,PMID 11539442
  15. ^Hagstrum, Jonathan T. (2005)."Antipodal Hotspots and Bipolar Catastrophes: Were Oceanic Large-body Impacts the Cause?"(PDF).Earth and Planetary Science Letters.236 (1–2):13–27.Bibcode:2005E&PSL.236...13H.doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2005.02.020.
  16. ^"Updated: Drilling of dinosaur-killing impact crater explains buried circular hills". 2016-05-03.
  17. ^Fleur, Nicholas St (2016-11-17)."Drilling into the Chicxulub Crater, Ground Zero of the Dinosaur Extinction".The New York Times.
  18. ^Michael R. Rampino, Stanley H. Ambrose, 2000."Volcanic winter in the Garden of Eden: The Toba supereruption and the late Pleistocene human population crash", Volcanic Hazards and Disasters in Human Antiquity, Floyd W. McCoy, Grant Heiken
  19. ^abcdBobrowsky, Peter T.; Rickman, Hans (2007),Comet/Asteroid Impacts and Human Society: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Springer,Bibcode:2007caih.book.....B,ISBN 978-3-540-32711-0
  20. ^abLewis, John S. (2000),Comet and Asteroid Impact Hazards on a Populated Earth: Computer Modeling,Academic Press,ISBN 978-0-12-446760-6
  21. ^"Discovery Statistics – Cumulative Totals". NASA/JPL CNEOS. February 5, 2018. Retrieved2018-02-08.
  22. ^Matt Williams (October 20, 2017)."Good News Everyone! There are Fewer Deadly Undiscovered Asteroids than we Thought".Universe Today. Retrieved2017-11-14.

External links

[edit]
Technological
Sociological
Ecological
Climate change
Earth Overshoot Day
Biological
Extinction
Others
Astronomical
Eschatological
Others
Fictional
Organizations
General
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Impact_winter&oldid=1322810226"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp