Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Philippine languages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromISO 639:phi)
Proposed branch of the Austronesian language family
This article is about a proposed subgroup of the Austronesian language family. For the native languages spoken in the Philippines, seeLanguages of the Philippines.

Philippine
Philippinic
(proposed)
Geographic
distribution
Native speakers
(undated figure of 115+ million)
Linguistic classificationAustronesian
Proto-languageProto-Philippine (disputed)
Subdivisions
Language codes
ISO 639-2 /5phi
ISO 639-3
GlottologNone
The Philippine languages, per Adelaar and Himmelmann (2005)

ThePhilippine languages orPhilippinic are a proposed group byR. David Paul Zorc (1986) andRobert Blust (1991; 2005; 2019) that include all the languages of thePhilippines and northernSulawesi,Indonesia—exceptSama–Bajaw (languages of the "Sea Gypsies") and theMolbog language (disputed)—and form asubfamily ofAustronesian languages.[1][2][3][4] Although the Philippines is near the center ofAustronesian expansion fromTaiwan, there is relatively little linguistic diversity among the approximately 150 Philippine languages, suggesting that earlier diversity has been erased by the spread ofthe ancestor of the modern Philippine languages.[5][2]

Classification

[edit]

History and criticism

[edit]
See also:Proto-Philippine language

One of the first explicit classifications of a "Philippine" grouping based on genetic affiliation was in 1906 by Frank Blake, who placed them as a subdivision of the "Malay branch" withinMalayo-Polynesian (MP), which at that time was considered as a family. Blake however encompasses every language within the geographic boundaries of thePhilippine archipelago to be under a single group.[6] Formal arguments in support of a specific "Proto-Philippines" were followed by Matthew Charles in 1974, Teodoro Llamzon in 1966 and 1975, and Llamzon and Teresita Martin in 1976.[7][8][9][10] Blust (1991) two decades later updates this based on Zorc's (1986) inclusion ofYami, and theSangiric,Minahasan, andGorontalo groups.[6]

The genetic unity of a Philippines group has been rejected particularly byLawrence Reid.[11] This arose with problems in reconstructing Philippine subgroups within MP (Pawley, 1999; Ross, 2005).[12][13] In a recent state-of-the art on the classification of Philippine languages, he provides multidisciplinary arguments on the field's methodological and theoretical shortcomings since Conant's description in the early 1900s. This includes Malayo-Polynesian archeology (Spriggs, 2003; 2007; 2011),[14][15][16] andBayesian phylogenetic analyses (Gray et al., 2009)[17] substantiating the multiplicity of historical diffusion and divergence of languages across the archipelago.[18] He suggests that the primary branches under this widely acknowledged Philippine group should instead be promoted as primary branches underMalayo-Polynesian.[19] Malcolm Ross (2005) earlier also noted that theBatanic languages, constitutingYami,Itbayat, andIvatan, should in fact be considered as a primary MP branch.[13] In an evaluation of thelexical innovations among the Philippine languages, Alexander Smith (2017) regards the evidence for a Philippine subgroup as weak, and concludes that "they may represent more than one primary subgroup or perhaps an innovation-definedlinkage".[20] Chen et al. (2022) present further arguments for the Philippine languages being a convergence area rather than a unified phylogenetic subgroup.[21]

Internal classification

[edit]

The Philippine group is proposed to have originated fromProto-Malayo-Polynesian and ultimately fromProto-Austronesian. There have been several proposals as to the composition within the group, but the most widely accepted groupings today is the consensus classifications by Blust (1991; 2005) and Reid (2017); however, both disagree on the existence of a Philippine group as a single genetic unit.

Zorc (1979)

[edit]

An earlier classification by Zorc (1979) is presented below. From approximately north to south, a Philippine group according to his analysis of previous reconstructions are divided into two main subgroups, Northern or "Cordilleran" and Southern or "Sulic".[22] Note that the groupings herein no longer reflect widely accepted classifications or naming conventions today. For exampleSouth Extension nowadays reflects the widely establishedCentral Luzon, and North Mangyan withinCordilleran is not supported by later reconstructions; the group containingYami,Ivatan andItbayat is called "Bashiic" in Zorc (1977) and remains generally accepted.[23]

Blust (1991; 2005)

[edit]

From approximately north to south, the Philippine languages are divided into 12 subgroups (including unclassified languages):

Formerly classified as one of theSouth Mindanao languages, theKlata language is now considered to be a primary branch of the Southern Philippine languages by Zorc (2019).[24]

Map of the distribution of the major languages of the Philippines, showing their subdivisions

Vocabulary

[edit]

Comparison chart between several selected Philippine languages spoken from north to south withProto-Austronesian first for comparison.

English12345personhousedogcoconutdaynewwe (incl.)whatfire
Proto-Austronesian*əsa
*isa
*duSa*təlu*Səpat*lima*Cau*Rumaq*asu*niuR*qaləjaw*baqəRu*i-kita*n-anu*Sapuy
Batanic (Bashiic)Yami (Tao)ásadóa (raroa)tílo (tatlo)apat (ápat)limataovahaychitoniyoyarawvayoyatenangoapoy
Ivatanasadadowatatdoapatlimataovahaychitoniyoyarawva-yoyatenangoapoy
Northern LuzonIlocanomaysaduatallouppatlimataobalayasoniogaldawbarositayoaniaapoy
Ibanagtaddayduatalluappa'limatolaybalaykituniukaggawbagusittamanniafi
Gaddangantetaddwatalloappatlimatolaybalayatuayogawbawuikkanetamsanenayafuy
Pangasinansakeydua
duara
talo
talora
apat
apatira
limatooabongasoniyogageobalosikatayoantopool
Central LuzonKapampanganmétungadwáatlúápatlimátáubaléásungúngutaldóbáyuítámunánuapî
Central PhilippineTagalogisadalawatatloapatlimataobahayasoniyogarawbagotayoanoapoy
Central Bikolsarôduwatuloapátlimatawoharongayam
idò
niyogaldawbâgokitáanokalayo
Rinconada Bikoləsaddarwātolōəpatlimatawōbaləyayamnoyogaldəwbāgokitāonōkalayō
Warayusa
sayo
duhatuloupatlimatawobalayayam
ido
lubiadlawbag-okitaanokalayo
Hiligaynonisaduhatatloapatlimatawobalayidolubiadlawbag-okitaanokalayo
Bantoanon (Asi)usaruhatuyoupatlimatawobayayironidogadlawbag-okitani-okayado
Romblomanonisaduhatuyoupatlimatawobayayayamniyogadlawbag-okitaanokalayo
Onhanisyadarwatatloap-atlimatawobalayayamniyogadlawbag-okitaanokalayo
Karay-asaradarwatatloapatlimatahobalayayamniyogadlawbag-okita
tatən
anokalayo
Aklanonisaea
sambilog
daywatatloap-atlimatawobaeayayamniyogadlawbag-okitaanokaeayo
Cebuanousaduhatuloupatlimatawobalayirolubiadlawbag-okitaunsakalayo
Tausugisa
hambuuk
duwatuupatlimataubayiru'niyugadlawba-gukitaniyuunukayu
DanaoMaguindanaoisaduatelupatlimatauwalayasuniyuggaybagutanunginapuy
Mëranawisadowat'lophatlimatawwalayasoneyoggawi'ebagotanotonaaapoy
Iranunisaduatelupa'atlimatawwalayasuniyuggawi'ibagutanuantunaapuy
South Mindanao (Bilic)Tbolisotulewutlufatlimataugunuohulefokdawlomitekuyteduofih
MinahasanTombulu (Minahasa)esazua
rua
teluepatlimatouwaléasupo'po'endowerukai
kita
apaapi
SangiricSangiresesembau
esa'
daruatateluepa'limataubalékapuna'bango'elowuhukitétawéputung
Gorontalo–MongondowGorontalotuwewuduluwototoluopatolimotawubele'apulabongodulahubohu'itowolotulu
Mongondowinta'duatoluopatlimaintaubaloiungku'bango'singgaimobagukitaonu, ondatulu'

See also

[edit]
Defunct language regulators

Notes

[edit]
1.^ Ambiguous relationship with other Northern Philippine groups
2.^ Ambiguous relationship with other Northern Philippine groups and has possible relationship with South Extension; equivalent to the widely establishedBatanic or Bashiic branch.

References

[edit]
  1. ^Zorc, R. David Paul (1986). "The Genetic Relationships of Philippine Languages". In Geraghty, P.; Carrington, L.; Wurm, S. A. (eds.).FOCAL II: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics. Pacific Linguistics, Series C, No. 94. Canberra: The Australian National University. pp. 147–173.doi:10.15144/PL-C94.147.hdl:1885/252029.ISBN 0-85883-345-X.
  2. ^abBlust, Robert (1991). "The Greater Central Philippines Hypothesis".Oceanic Linguistics.30 (2):73–129.doi:10.2307/3623084.JSTOR 3623084.
  3. ^Blust, Robert A. (2005). "The Linguistic Macrohistory of the Philippines". In Liao, Hsiu-Chuan; Rubino, Carl R.Galvez (eds.).Current Issues in Philippine Linguistics Pangaral Kay Lawrence A. Reid. Linguistic Society of the Philippines and SIL Philippines. pp. 31–68.
  4. ^Blust, Robert (2019). "The Resurrection of Proto-Philippines".Oceanic Linguistics.58 (2):153–256.doi:10.1353/ol.2019.0008.S2CID 216726665.
  5. ^Adelaar & Himmelmann (2005)
  6. ^abBlust, Robert (1991). "The Greater Central Philippines Hypothesis".Oceanic Linguistics.30 (2):73–129.doi:10.2307/3623084.JSTOR 3623084.
  7. ^Llamzon, Teodoro A. (1975)."Proto-Philippine Phonology".Archipel.9:29–42.doi:10.3406/arch.1975.1214 – via Persée.
  8. ^Charles, Mathew (1974). "Problems in the Reconstruction of Proto-Philippine Phonology and the Subgrouping of the Philippine Languages".Oceanic Linguistics.13 (1/2):457–509.doi:10.2307/3622751.JSTOR 3622751.
  9. ^Llamzon, Teodoro (1966). "The Subgrouping of Philippine Languages".Philippine Sociological Review.14 (3):145–150.JSTOR 23892050.
  10. ^Llamzon, Teodoro; Martin, Teresita (1976)."A Subgrouping of 100 Philippine Languages"(PDF).South-East Asian Linguistic Studies.2:141–172.
  11. ^Reid, Lawrence (1982)."The Demise of Proto-Philippines"(PDF). In Amran Halim; Carrington, Lois; Stephen A. (eds.).Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics. Pacific Linguistics, Series C, No. 75. Vol. 2: Tracking the Travellers. Canberra: Australian National University. pp. 201–216.
  12. ^Pawley, Andrew (1999). "Chasing Rainbows: Implications for the Rapid Dispersal of Austronesian Languages for Subgrouping and Reconstruction". In Zeitoun, Eilzabeth; Li, Paul Jen-kuei (eds.).Selected Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics. Taipei: Academia Sinica. pp. 95–138.
  13. ^abRoss, Malcolm (2005)."The Batanic Languages in Relation to the Early History of the Malayo-Polynesian Subgroup of Austronesian"(PDF).Journal of Austronesian Studies.1 (2):1–24.
  14. ^Spriggs, Matthew (2003). "Chronology of Neolithic Transition in Island Southeast Asia and The Western Pacific".The Review of Anthropology.24:57–80.
  15. ^Spriggs, Matthew (2007). "The Neolithic and Austronesian Expansion Within Island Southeast Asia and Into the Pacific". In Chiu, Scarlett; Sand, Christophe (eds.).From Southeast Asia to the Pacific: Archeological Perspectives on the Austronesian Expansion and the Lapita Cultural Complex. Taipei: Academia Sinica. pp. 104–140.
  16. ^Spriggs, Matthew (2011)."Archeology and Austronesian Expansion: Where Are We Now?"(PDF).Antiquity.85 (328):510–528.doi:10.1017/s0003598x00067910.S2CID 162491927.
  17. ^Gray, Russell; Drummond, Alexei; Greenhill, Simon (2009). "Language Phylogenies Reveal Expansion Pulses and Pauses in Pacific Settlement".Science.323 (5913):479–482.Bibcode:2009Sci...323..479G.doi:10.1126/science.1166858.PMID 19164742.S2CID 29838345.
  18. ^Reid, Lawrence (2017).Revisiting the Position of Philippine Languages in the Austronesian Family(PDF). The Br. Andrew Gonzalez FSC (BAG) Distinguished Professorial Chair Lecture, 2017, De La Salle University, Manila.
  19. ^Reid, Lawrence A. (2018)."Modeling the Linguistic Situation in the Philippines". In Kikusawa, Ritsuko; Reid, Lawrence A. (eds.).Let's Talk about Trees. Vol. 98. Osaka: Senri Ethnological Studies, Minpaku.doi:10.15021/00009006.{{cite book}}:|journal= ignored (help)
  20. ^Smith, Alexander D. (2017). "The Western Malayo-Polynesian Problem".Oceanic Linguistics.56 (2):435–490.doi:10.1353/ol.2017.0021.S2CID 149377092., p. 479
  21. ^Chen, Victoria, Kristina Gallego, Jonathan Kuo, Isaac Stead, & Benjamin van der Voorn. 2022.Contact or inheritance? New evidence on the Proto-Philippines debate. Presentation given at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (SEALS 31),University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, May 18–20, 2022. (slides)
  22. ^Zorc, R. David Paul (1979). "On the Development of Contrastive Word Accent: Pangasinan, a Case in Point". In Nguyen, Dang Liem (ed.).Southeast Asian Linguistic Studies, Vol. 3. Pacific Linguistics, Series C, No. 45. Canberra: The Australian National University. pp. 241–258.doi:10.15144/PL-C45.241.hdl:1885/253117.ISBN 0-85883-177-5.
  23. ^Zorc, David Paul (1977).The Bisayan Dialects of the Philippines: Subgrouping and Reconstruction. Pacific Linguistics, Series C, No. 44. Canberra: Australian National University.doi:10.15144/PL-C44.hdl:1885/146594.ISBN 0-85883-157-0 – via Archive.org.
  24. ^Zorc, R. David (2019)."Klata / Giangan: A New Southern Philippine Subgroup"(PDF).The Archive: Special Publication.16:33–51.

Works cited

[edit]
  • Adelaar, Alexander; Himmelmann, Nikolaus P., eds. (2005).The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar. London: Routledge.

Further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Official language
Malayo-Sumbawan
Bali–Sasak–Sumbawa
Chamic
Ibanic
Madurese
Malayic
Sundanese
Javanese
Celebic
Lampungic
Northwest Sumatra–
Barrier Islands
South Sulawesi
Barito
Kayan–Murik
Land Dayak
North Bornean
Philippine languages
Central Philippine
Gorontalo-Mongondow
Minahasan
Sangiric
Aru
Central Maluku
Flores–Lembata
Halmahera-
Cenderawasih
Kei-Tanimbar
Micronesian
Mapia
Selaru
Sumba–Flores
Timor–Babar
Western Oceanic
North Halmahera
Timor–Alor–Pantar
Asmat–Mombum
West Bird's Head
South Bird's Head
East Bird's Head
West Bomberai
Dani
Paniai Lakes
Digul River
Foja Range
Lakes Plain
East Cenderawasih Bay
Yawa
Demta–Sentani
Ok
Momuna–Mek
Skou
South Pauwasi
East Pauwasi
West Pauwasi
Kaure–Kosare
Marind–Yaqai
Bulaka River
Kayagar
Border
Senagi
Mairasi
Kolopom
Yam
Lower Mamberamo
Unclassfied of language isolates
Other languages
Creoles andPidgins
Malay-based creoles
Other creoles and pidgins
Immigrant languages
Chinese
European
Indian
Middle Eastern
Others
Sign languages
† indicateextinct languages
Main
Official
Families
Natives &
Indigenous
Nationwide
Peninsular
Malaysia
East
Malaysia
Significant
minority
Chinese
Indian
Indonesian
archipelago
Philippine
Others
Creoles
Mixed & Others
Immigrants
Signs
Main
By states
  • 1 Extinct languages
  • 2 Nearly extinct languages
Official languages
Regional languages
Indigenous languages
(byregion)
Bangsamoro
Bicol Region
Cagayan Valley
Calabarzon
Caraga
Central Luzon
Central Visayas
Cordillera
Davao Region
Eastern Visayas
Ilocos Region
Metro Manila
Mimaropa
Northern Mindanao
Soccsksargen
Western Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Immigrant languages
Sign languages
Historical languages
Batanic (Bashiic)
Bilic
Central Luzon
Sambalic
Greater Central
Philippine
Central Philippine
Bikol
Bisayan
Mansakan
Tagalogic
(unclassified)
Danao
Gorontalo–Mongondow
Manobo
Palawanic
Southern Mindoro
Subanen
Kalamian
Minahasan
Northern Luzon
Cagayan Valley
Meso-Cordilleran
Central Cordilleran
Southern Cordilleran
Northern Mindoro
Sangiric
Other branches
Manide–Alabat
Reconstructed
Formosan
Malayo-Polynesian
Western
Philippine
Greater Barito*
Greater North Borneo*
Celebic
South Sulawesi
Central
Eastern
SHWNG
Oceanic
Western
Southern
  • * indicates proposed status
  • ? indicates classification dispute
  • † indicatesextinct status
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philippine_languages&oldid=1282115893"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp