 | This articlerelies excessively onreferences toprimary sources. Please improve this article by addingsecondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Hypergamy" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(July 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
 Relationships (Outline) |
|---|
Hypergamy (colloquially referred to as "dating up" or "marrying up"[1]) is a term used insocial science for the act or practice of a persondating ormarrying a spouse of highersocial status than themselves.
Theantonym "hypogamy"[a] refers to the inverse:marrying a person of lower social class or status (colloquially "marrying down").
The termhypergyny can also be used to describe the overall practice of women marrying up, since the men would be marrying down.[2]
Concepts such as hypergamy, hypogamy, and hypergyny could be considered as special cases ofmésalliance.[3]
In a 2016 paper that explored the income difference between couples in 1980 and 2012, researcher Yue Qian noted that the tendency for women to marry men with higher incomes than themselves still persists in the modern era.[4]
The observed gender cliff in the distribution of women's share to thehousehold income at 50% can be explained by income hypergamy preferences by both men and women, together withgender pay gap.[5]
A study found traditional marriage practices in which men "marry down" and women "marry up" in education do not persist in countries wherewomen have higher educational attainment.[6]
Studies ofmate selection in dozens of countries around the world have found men and women report prioritizing different traits when it comes to choosing a mate, with both groups favoring attractive partners in general, but men tending to prefer women who are young while women tend to prefer men who are rich, well educated, and ambitious.[7] They argue that as societies shift towards becoming more gender-equal, women's mate selection preferences shift as well. Some research provides limited support for that theory,[8] while other research strongly contradicts it.[9]
One study found that women are more selective in their choice of marriage partners than are men.[10][11]
A study done by theUniversity of Minnesota in 2017 found that females generally prefer dominant males as mates.[12] Research conducted throughout the world strongly supports the position that women prefer marriage with partners who are culturally successful or have high potential to become culturally successful. The most extensive of these studies included 10,000 people in 37 cultures across six continents and five islands. Women rated "good financial prospect" higher than men did in all cultures. In 29 samples, the "ambition and industriousness" of a prospective mate were more important for women than for men. Meta-analysis of research published from 1965 to 1986 revealed the same sex difference (Feingold, 1992). Across studies, 3 out of 4 women rated socioeconomic status as more important in a prospective marriage partner than did the average man.
In Britain, marrying up has decreased significantly since the 1950s.[13] It is becoming less common for women to marry older men, because current socioeconomic dynamics allow women more autonomy. Hypergamy does not necessitate the man being older; rather, it requires him to have higher status. The term 'social equals' typically pertains to sharedsocial circles rather thaneconomic equality.[14][15][13]
A 2012 analysis of a survey of 8,953 people in 37 countries, which found that the more gender-equal a country, the likelier male and female respondents were to report seeking the same qualities in each other rather than different ones.[16]
An empirical study examined the mate preferences of subscribers to anonline dating service in Israel that had a highly skewed sex ratio (646 men for 1,000 women). Despite this skewed sex ratio, they found that "On education and socioeconomic status, women on average express greater hypergamic selectivity; they prefer mates who are superior to them in these traits... while men express a desire for an analogue of hypergamy based onphysical attractiveness; they desire a mate who ranks higher on the physical attractiveness scale than they themselves do."[17]: 51
One study did not find a statistical difference in the number of women or men "marrying-up" in a sample of 1,109 first-time married couples in the United States.[18]
Gilles Saint-Paul (2008) proposes a mathematical model that purports to demonstrate that human female hypergamy occurs because women have greater lost matingopportunity costs from monogamous mating (given their slower reproductive rate and limited window of fertility compared to men), and thus must be compensated for this cost of marriage. At the end of his introduction, Saint-Paul states his model is consistent with statistics published by Bertrand et al (2013) but also notes that in US Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) data gathered the same year "aggregate evidence is not so clear-cut."[19]
References toHindu law books from theIndian subcontinent in the 19th century include theSanskrit termsanuloma andpratiloma, respectively, for the concepts of hypergamy and hypogamy.[20]
It seemed clear from my materials that, as long ago proposed by Risley (1908) and Rivers (1921), this practice was a product of hypergyny, the upward flow of brides in a society which, being pyramidal, had fewer grooms at the top
The dictionary definition ofhypergamy at Wiktionary| Legal scenarios | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religious | |||||||||
| Age | |||||||||
| Arranged | |||||||||
| Ceremonial | |||||||||
| Circumstantial basis |
| ||||||||
| De facto | |||||||||
| Endogamy | |||||||||
| Exogamy | |||||||||
| Non-monogamous | |||||||||
| Sexless | |||||||||
| Other | |||||||||
.svg)
