Dixon has a wide scope in terms of the areas of economics he has researched and published in and he has been described as one of Europe's leading economists.[13] The topics include:
Bounded rationality. Dixon explored the implications of evolutionary ideas for oligopoly theory and learning.[22] He also developed one of the first models ofendogenous aspirations in economics.[23]
New Keynesian Macreconomics. Dixon was one of the first economists to examine the effect ofimperfect competition on the effectiveness of fiscal policy in his paperA simple model of imperfect competition with Walrasian features.[24] This is an idea that was much explored in many other papers by him[25] and more recently.[26] This paper was the first to demonstrate in a simplegeneral equilibrium model that thefiscal multiplier could be increasing with the degree ofimperfect competition in the output market. The reason for this is thatimperfect competition in the output market tends to reduce thereal wage, leading to the household substituting away fromconsumption towardsleisure. Whengovernment spending is increased, the corresponding increase inlump-sum taxation causes both leisure and consumption decrease (assuming that they are both a normal good). The greater the degree of imperfect competition in the output market, the lower thereal wage and hence the more the reduction falls on leisure (i.e. households work more) and less on consumption. Hence thefiscal multiplier is less than one, but increasing in the degree of imperfect competition in the output market.
^A simple model of imperfect competition with Walrasian features, Oxford Economic Papers, 1987, 39, 134–160
^Imperfect competition and macroeconomics: a survey" Huw Dixon and Neil Rankin, Oxford Economic Papers, 1994, 46, 171–199
^Luís F. Costa and Huw David Dixon (2011) Fiscal Policy under Imperfect Competition with Flexible Prices: An Overview and Survey. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, Vol. 5, 2011–3