35°40′35.5″N139°44′40.5″E / 35.676528°N 139.744583°E /35.676528; 139.744583
House of Councillors | |
|---|---|
| 219th Session of the National Diet | |
 | |
| Type | |
| Type | of theNational Diet |
| Leadership | |
| Structure | |
| Seats | 248 |
 | |
Political groups | Government (100)
Supported by (19)
Opposition (120)
Unaffiliated (9)
|
| Committees | 17 committees |
Length of term | 6 years |
| Salary | President:¥2,170,000/m Vice President:¥1,584,000/m Members:¥1,294,000/m |
| Elections | |
| Parallel voting: Single non-transferable vote (148 seats) Party-list proportional representation (100 seats) Staggered elections | |
First election | 20 April 1947 |
Last election | 20 July 2025 |
Next election | 2028 |
| Meeting place | |
 | |
| Chamber of the House of Councillors | |
| Website | |
www | |
TheHouse of Councillors (参議院,Sangiin;Japanese pronunciation:[saŋʲ.ɡʲiꜜ.iɴ,-ŋʲiꜜ-][1]) is theupper house of theNational Diet ofJapan. TheHouse of Representatives is thelower house. The House of Councillors is the successor to the pre-warHouse of Peers. If the two houses disagree on matters of the budget, treaties, or the nomination of the prime minister, the House of Representatives can insist on its decision. In other decisions, the House of Representatives can override a vote of the House of Councillors only by a two-thirds majority of members present.
The House of Councillors has 248 members who each serve six-year terms, two years longer than those of the House of Representatives. Councillors must be at least 30 years old, compared with 25 years old in the House of Representatives. The House of Councillors cannot be dissolved, and terms arestaggered so that only half of its membership is up for election every three years. Of the 121 members subject to election each time, 73 are elected from45 districts bysingle non-transferable vote (SNTV) and 48 are elected from a nationwide list byproportional representation (PR) withopen lists.[2]
The power of House of Councillors is very similar to theCanadian Senate or theIrish Seanad.[3] In central issues, there is a "supremacy of the House of Representatives" (衆議院の優越,Shūgiin no yūetsu). In theelection of the prime minister, the ratification of international treaties, and on passing the budget, a decision by the House of Representatives always overrides dissent from the House of Councillors. Only the lower house can pass votes of no-confidence against the cabinet. All other legislation requires either the approval by majorities in both houses, an agreement in the conference committee of both houses or an additional override vote by two-thirds majority in the House of Representatives.[4][5] However, no single party has ever won a two-thirds majority in the House of Representatives under the current constitution, although the LDP came close several times, as did the DPJ in 2009. In other words, controlling a majority in the House of Councillors and one third of the House of Representatives is enough for a united opposition to be able to block the passage of legislation. For certain important administrative nominations by the cabinet, the approval of both houses is required (although the laws containing this requirement could be changed by two-thirds lower house override as a "nuclear option"); and constitutional amendment proposals need two-thirds majorities in both the houses of the Diet to be submitted to the people in a nationalreferendum.[3]
One additional constitutional role of the House of Councillors is to serve as functioning fully elected emergency legislature on its own during lower house election campaigns: While the House of Representatives is dissolved, the National Diet can not be convened, and therefore no law can be passed in regular procedure; but in urgent cases requiring parliamentary action (e.g. election management, provisional budgets, disaster response), an emergency session (緊急集会,kinkyū shūkai) of the House of Councillors can still be invoked to take provisional decisions for the whole Diet. Such decisions will become invalid unless confirmed by the House of Representatives as soon as the whole Diet convenes again.
The basic stipulations on the role of the House of Councillors are subject of chapter IV of theconstitution.[6] Laws and rules containing more detailed provisions on parliamentary procedures and the relations between the two houses include the National Diet Law (国会法,Kokkai-hō),[7] the conference committee regulations (両院協議会規程,ryōin-kyōgikai kitei),[8] and the rules of each house (衆議院/参議院規則,Shūgiin/Sangiin kisoku).[9]
In practice, governments often tried to ensure legislative majorities, either by formingcoalition governments with safe legislative majorities in the first place or by negotiating with part of the opposition, or avoided to submit bills with no prospects of passage,[10] so the House of Councillors rarely voted against the decisions reached by the lower house for much of postwar history: As theLiberal Democratic Party (LDP), founded in 1955, often held majorities in both houses or was sufficiently close to control both houses together with independents and micro-parties for a long period, inter-chamber disagreement was rare during most of the1955 System.
After the opposition victory in the 1989 election, the relative importance of the House of Councillors initially increased, as the LDP continued to govern alone and did not hold a two-thirds majority in the House of Representatives. Crucial legislation had to be negotiated with parts of the opposition. The most prominent example was the so-called "PKO Diet" (PKO国会,PKO Kokkai) of 1992 when the LDP negotiated and passed the peace-keeping operations bill with centre-left/right-of-JSP opposition parties (DSP andKōmeitō) against fierce opposition fromJSP andJCP; the Peace-Keeping Operations law (PKO law) became the base for the Self-Defense Forces' first ground deployment abroad as part of theUN mission in Cambodia. After the 1993 House of Representatives election, with the exception of abrief minority government in 1994, coalition governments or theconfidence and supply arrangement during therestored LDP single-party government ensured legislative government majorities until the opposition victory in the 1998 House of Councillors election which led to the formation of another coalition government by 1999.
The legislative two-thirds override power of the House of Representatives was never used between 1950s and 2008 when the LDP-Kōmeitō coalition government had lost the House of Councillors majority in the 2007 election, but did control a two-thirds majority in the House of Representatives since 2005. After that, it has been used somewhat more frequently (see衆議院の再議決,Shūgin no saikaketsu, "Override decisions by the House of Representatives" for a list). If a government controls a two-thirds majority in the House of Representatives and is willing to use it, the House of Councillors can only delay a bill, but not prevent passage.
Opposition control of the House of Councillors is often summarized by the termnejire Kokkai (ねじれ国会, "twisted" or "skewed" Diet). Setting aside the immediate postwar years, when many governments were in the minority in the upper house, but the strongest force, the centristRyokufūkai, was not in all-out opposition to either centre-left or centre-right governments and willing to cooperate, the Diet was "twisted" from 1989 to 1993, 1998–1999, 2007–2009, and most recently 2010–2013.
In recent years, many constitutional revision advocates call for reforming the role of the House of Councillors ("carbon copy" of the House of Representatives or "recalcitrant naysayer") or abolishing it altogether to "prevent political paralysis", after the recently more frequent twisted Diets have seen an increase in inter-chamber friction/"political nightmare"s.[11][12] Examples of high-stakes, internationally noted conflicts in recent twisted Diets:
Article 102 of theJapanese Constitution provided that half of the councillors elected in the first House of Councillors election in1947 would be up for re-electionthree years later in order to introduce staggered six-year terms.
The House initially had 250 seats. Two seats were added to the House in 1970 after the agreement on the repatriation ofOkinawa, increasing the House to a total of 252.[15] Legislation aimed at addressingmalapportionment that favoured less populated prefectures was introduced in 2000; this resulted in ten seats being removed (five each at the 2001 and 2004 elections), bringing the total number of seats to 242.[15] Further reforms to address malapportionment took effect in 2007 and 2016, but did not change the total number of members in the house.[15]
From 1947 to 1983, the House had 100 seats allocated to anationwide district, of which fifty seats were allocated in each election, elected bysingle non-transferable vote.[15] It was originally intended to give nationally prominent figures a route to the House without going through local electioneering processes.[citation needed] Some national political figures, such as feministsShidzue Katō andFusae Ichikawa and former Imperial Army generalKazushige Ugaki, were elected through the nationwide district, along with a number of celebrities such as comedianYukio Aoshima (later Governor of Tokyo), journalistHideo Den and actressYūko Mochizuki.[citation needed]Shintaro Ishihara won a record 3 million votes in the nationwide district in the1968 election.[citation needed] The last 50-seat SNTV election took place in1980. For the1983 election the electoral system was changed to closed-list proportional representation; to avoid ambiguity, the nationwide district was now called theproportional district.[15] The national proportional representation district was reduced to 96 members in the 2000 reforms.[15]
 | This section needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(April 2024) |
 | |||||||||
| Caucus (English name)[17] (domestic name) | Parties | Members | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Term | Total | ||||||||
| 29 July 2019 – 28 July 2025 (elected2019, up2025) | 26 July 2022 – 25 July 2028 (elected2022, up2028) | ||||||||
| PR | SNTV/FPTP | Subtotal | PR | SNTV/FPTP | Subtotal | ||||
| Government | 140 | ||||||||
| Liberal Democratic Party Jiyūminshutō | Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) | 19 | 33 | 52 | 18 | 43 | 61 | 113 | |
| Komeito Kōmeitō | Komeito | 7 | 7 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 27 | |
| Opposition | 91 | ||||||||
| The Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan and Social Democratic Party Rikken-minshu / Shamin / Mushozoku | Constitutional Democratic Party (CDP) Social Democratic Party (SDP) Independents | 9 | 15 | 24 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 42 | |
| Nippon Ishin (Japan Innovation Party) Nippon Ishin no Kai | Nippon Ishin no Kai | 4 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 18 | |
| Democratic Party For the People and The Shin-Ryokufukai Kokumin-minshutō / Shin-Ryokufūkai | Democratic Party For the People (DPFP) Independents | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 11 | |
| Japanese Communist Party Nihon Kyōsantō | Japanese Communist Party (JCP) | 4 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 11 | |
| Reiwa Shinsengumi Reiwa Shinsengumi | Reiwa Shinsengumi | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
| The Party to Protect People from NHK NHK kara kokumin o mamoru tō | The Party to Protect the People from NHK | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| Okinawa Whirlwind Okinawa no Kaze | Okinawa Social Mass Party | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Independents (government & opposition) | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 | ||
| Independents Members not affiliated with any parliamentary caucus | LDP 1 (President) CDP 1 (Vice President) Sanseitō 1 Independents | ||||||||
| Total | 50 | 67 | 117 | 50 | 73 | 123 | 240 | ||
| Vacant: 8 majoritarian seats, three fromTokyo and one each fromKanagawa,Aichi,Osaka,Hyōgo andWakayama (no by-elections before 2025 regular election without additional vacancies; Tokyo will hold an integrated by- and regular election)[18] | N/A | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |
For a list of individual members, see theList of members of the Diet of Japan#House of Councillors.
| Election | Cabinet | Prime Minister | Date | Turnout | Total seats | Elected seats | Term expiration date | Majority party / Seats share | Emperor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Yoshida I | Shigeru Yoshida | 20 April 1947 | 61.12% | 250 | 250 | 2 May 1953 | Socialist | 47 | 18.80% | Shōwa (era) | |
| 2nd | Yoshida III | 4 June 1950 | 72.19% | 125 | 3 June 1956 | Liberal | 76 | 30.40% | ||||
| 3rd | Yoshida IV | 24 April 1953 | 63.18% | 2 May 1959 | 93 | 37.20% | ||||||
| 4th | I. Hatoyama III | Ichirō Hatoyama | 8 July 1956 | 62.11% | 7 July 1962 | Liberal Democratic | 122 | 48.80% | ||||
| 5th | Kishi II | Nobusuke Kishi | 2 June 1959 | 58.75% | 1 June 1965 | 132 | 52.80% | |||||
| 6th | Ikeda II | Hayato Ikeda | 1 July 1962 | 68.22% | 7 July 1968 | 142 | 56.80% | |||||
| 7th | Satō I | Eisaku Satō | 4 July 1965 | 67.02% | 1 July 1971 | 140 | 55.77% | |||||
| 8th | Satō II | 7 July 1968 | 68.94% | 7 July 1974 | 142 | 54.80% | ||||||
| 9th | Satō III | 27 June 1971 | 59.24% | 252 | 126 | 10 July 1977 | 131 | 52.61% | ||||
| 10th | K. Tanaka II | Kakuei Tanaka | 7 July 1974 | 73.20% | 7 July 1980 | 126 | 50.40% | |||||
| 11th | T. Fukuda | Takeo Fukuda | 10 July 1977 | 68.49% | 9 July 1983 | 124 | 49.79% | |||||
| 12th | Ōhira II | Masayoshi Ōhira | 22 June 1980 | 74.54% | 7 July 1986 | 135 | 54.00% | |||||
| 13th | Nakasone I | Yasuhiro Nakasone | 26 June 1983 | 57.00% | 9 July 1989 | 137 | 54.36% | |||||
| 14th | Nakasone II (R2) | 6 July 1986 | 71.36% | 7 July 1992 | 143 | 56.74% | ||||||
| 15th | Uno | Sōsuke Uno | 23 July 1989 | 65.02% | 252 | 126 | 22 July 1995 | 109 | 43.25% | Akihito (Heisei) (era) | ||
| 16th | Miyazawa | Kiichi Miyazawa | 26 July 1992 | 50.72% | 25 July 1998 | 107 | 42.46% | |||||
| 17th | Murayama | Tomiichi Murayama | 23 July 1995 | 44.52% | 22 July 2001 | 111 | 44.04% | |||||
| 18th | Hashimoto II (R) | Ryutaro Hashimoto | 12 July 1998 | 58.84% | 25 July 2004 | 103 | 40.87% | |||||
| Election | Cabinet | Prime Minister | Date | Turnout | Total seats | Elected seats | Term expiration date | Majority party / Seats share | Emperor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19th | Koizumi I | Junichiro Koizumi | 29 July 2001 | 56.44% | 247 | 121 | 28 July 2007 | Liberal Democratic | 111 | 44.93% | Akihito (Heisei) (era) | |
| 20th | Koizumi II | 11 July 2004 | 56.57% | 242 | 25 July 2010 | 115 | 47.52% | |||||
| 21st | S. Abe I | Shinzo Abe | 29 July 2007 | 58.64% | 28 July 2013 | Democratic | 109 | 45.04% | ||||
| 22nd | Kan | Naoto Kan | 11 July 2010 | 57.92% | 25 July 2016 | 106 | 43.80% | |||||
| 23rd | S. Abe II | Shinzo Abe | 21 July 2013 | 52.61% | 28 July 2019 | Liberal Democratic | 115 | 47.52% | ||||
| 24th | S. Abe III (R1) | 10 July 2016 | 54.70% | 25 July 2022 | 121 | 50.00% | ||||||
| 25th | S. Abe IV (R1) | 21 July 2019 | 48.80% | 245 | 124 | 28 July 2025 | 113 | 46.12% | Naruhito (Reiwa) (era) | |||
| 26th | Kishida II | Fumio Kishida | 10 July 2022 | 52.05% | 248 | 25 July 2028 | 119 | 47.98% | ||||
| 27th | Ishiba II | Shigeru Ishiba | 20 July 2025 | 58.51% | 248 | 125 | 28 July 2031 | 101 | 40.73% | |||
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Academics | |
| Other | |
