TheEuropean Union is ageo-political entity, created in 1993, covering a large portion of theEuropean continent. It is founded upon numerous treaties and has undergone expansions and secessions that have taken it from sixmember states to 27, a majority of the states in Europe.
Since the beginning of the institutionalised modern European integration in 1948, the development of the European Union has been based on asupranational foundation that would "make war unthinkable and materially impossible"[1][2] and reinforce democracy amongst its members[3] as laid out byRobert Schuman and other leaders in theSchuman Declaration (1950) and theEurope Declaration (1951). This principle was at the heart of theEuropean Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) (1951), theTreaty of Paris (1951), and later theTreaty of Rome (1957) which established theEuropean Economic Community (EEC) and theEuropean Atomic Energy Community (EAEC). TheMaastricht Treaty (1992) created theEuropean Union with itspillars system, including foreign and home affairs alongside theEuropean Communities. This in turn led to the creation of the single European currency,the euro (launched 1999). The ECSC expired in 2002. The Maastricht Treaty has been amended by the treaties ofAmsterdam (1997),Nice (2001) andLisbon (2007), the latter merging the three pillars into a single legal entity, though the EAEC has maintained a distinct legal identity despite sharing members and institutions.
The known world inAncient Greece was differentiated into three landmasses:Asia, "Libya" (Africa) andEurope, giving rise to identifying the European landmass as a coherent area, acontinent.
The European landmass was populated and territorialized by many long before its conceptualization as a coherent continent. But theRoman Empire, an empire built on theHellenistic world andAlexandrian Empire,Ancient Egypt, theLevant andNorth Africa, became the first state to control the wholeMediterranean Basin and also large parts, particularly theSouthern andWestern parts of the European landmass. This historic prominence in the Mediterranean Basin and Europe has been invoked by states that came after it, claiming succession to Roman authority and to legitimate their rule over lands throughout the former Romaneucomene, and therefore also in Europe, particularly in Western Europe, the lands of the laterWestern Roman Empire ofLatinRome. The latter established Western Europe as a coherent and independent political area of Europe, which has taken sometimes prominence, as simplythe West, over the concept of Europe. Similarly other concepts for Europe as a coherent political space have been used, such as for exampleFrangistan.
The Frankish Empire at its greatest extent, ca. 814 AD
The GreekEastern Rome, also called Byzantine Empire, remained long after the dissolution of the Western Roman Empire, sustaining a coherent political space also over large areas of Europe, particularly of (South-)Eastern Europe, or simplythe East, giving rise to the other major particular Europe. With thefall of the Eastern Roman Empire in 1453, theOttoman Empire and theRussian Tsardom, and ultimately theEmpire (1547–1917), with Moscow as the so-calledThird Rome, used claims of inheritance of the eastern Roman Empire to legitimate their rule over larger areas of Europe, though not exclusively.[14]
^The Frankish Empire has had a symbolic relevance for the building of Europe since the 20th century:Charlemagne is often regarded as the "Father of Europe" and a similarity between the borders of Charlemagne's Empire and that of theEuropean Economic Community was made explicit during the 1965 Aachen exhibition sponsored by the Council of Europe.[4] Kikuchi Yoshio (菊池良生) of Meiji University suggested that the notion of Holy Roman Empire as a federal political entity influenced the later structural ideas of the European Union.[5]
But also otherpolities of Europe have established, independently from Rome and Byzantine, their European realms, such as a range of pre-Roman or pre-Christian Greek, Germanic, Celtic, Slavic and Hungarian powers,Khanates, orAl-Andalus and theSicilian Emirate.
In 15th century,King of BohemiaGeorge of Poděbrady proposed theTreaty on the Establishment of Peace throughout Christendom which sought to end military conflict between Christian kingdoms of Europe. The treaty proposed a multilateral framework, including a peaceful dispute resolution process, but despite a vigorous promotional campaign, the proposal was ultimately unsuccessful.[16] This effort has been occasionally noted as a first coherent proposal for a proto-European Union.[17]
In theCongress of Aix-la-Chapelle of 1818,Tsar Alexander, as the most advanced internationalist of the day, suggested a kind of permanent European union and even proposed the maintenance of international military forces to provide recognised states with support against changes by violence.[18]
A day will come when all nations on our continent will form a European brotherhood ... A day will come when we shall see ... the United States of America and the United States of Europe face to face, reaching out for each other across the seas.[22]
During theinterwar period, the consciousness that national markets in Europe were interdependent though confrontational, along with the observation of a larger and growing US market on the other side of the ocean, nourished the urge for the economic integration of the continent.[23] In 1920, advocating the creation of a Europeaneconomic union, the British economistJohn Maynard Keynes wrote that "a Free Trade Union should be established ... to impose no protectionist tariffs whatever against the produce of other members of the Union."[24] During the same decade, theAustrianRichard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, in light of the dissolution of theHabsburg Empire, imagined as one of the first modern political unions of Europe, founded thePan-Europa Movement.[25] His ideas influenced his contemporaries, among whom was then-Prime Minister of FranceAristide Briand. As French prime minister,Nobel Peace Prize laureate for theLocarno Treaties and follower of the Paneuropean Union Aristide Briand delivered a widely recognized speech at theLeague of Nations, the precursor of theUnited Nations,[26] inGeneva on 5 September 1929 for afederal Europe to secure Europe and settle the historicFranco-German enmity.[27][28]
After two devastating world wars, the political climate favoured an international unity that could preserve peace in Europe effectively (Hamburg, after a massiveAlliedbombing in 1943 in the picture).
World War II from 1939 to 1945 demonstrated more than ever the horrors of war, but particularly also ofextremism, of discrimination and of genocide. As with devastating wars before, there was a desire to ensure it could never happen again, particularly with the war bringing the worldnuclear weapons. Most European countries failed to maintain theirGreat Power status, with the exception of theSoviet Union, which became a superpower after World War II and maintained that status for 45 years. This left two rival ideologically opposed superpowers.[29]
With war still raging, resistance movements formulated their vision of a post-war Europe, theVentotene prison Manifesto of 1941 byAltiero Spinelli propagated European integration through theItalian Resistance and after 1943 through the ItalianEuropean Federalist Movement. In March 1943, in a radio address, theUnited Kingdom's leader SirWinston Churchill spoke warmly of "restoring the true greatness of Europe" once victory had been achieved, and mused on the post-war creation of a "Council of Europe" which would bring the European nations together to build peace.[31][32]
Though by 1947 a growing rift between the western Allied Powers and theSoviet Union became evident as a result of the rigged1947 Polish legislative election which constituted an open breach of theYalta Agreement, followed by the announcement of theTruman Doctrine on 12 March 1947. On 4 March 1947 France and the United Kingdom signed theTreaty of Dunkirk for mutual assistance in the event of future military aggression in the aftermath ofWorld War II against any of the pair. The rationale for the treaty was the threat of a potential future military attack, specifically a Soviet one in practice, though publicised under the disguise of a German one, according to the official statements. Immediately following theFebruary 1948 coup d'état by theCommunist Party of Czechoslovakia, theLondon Six-Power Conference was held, resulting in theSoviet boycott of the Allied Control Council and its incapacitation, an event marking the beginning of theCold War. The remainder of the year 1948 marked the beginning of the institutionalised modern European integration.
A pivotal moment in European integration was theHague Congress of May 1948, as it led to the creation of theEuropean Movement International, theCollege of Europe[39] and most importantly to the founding of theCouncil of Europe on the 5th of May 1949 (now known asEurope Day). The Council of Europe was the first institution to bring the sovereign nations of Western Europe together, raising great hopes and fevered debates in the following two years for further European integration.[citation needed] It has since been a broad forum to further cooperation and shared issues, achieving things like the 1950-signedEuropean Convention on Human Rights.
Essential for the actual birth of the institutions of the EU was the 9th of May 1950Schuman Declaration (on the day after the fifthVictory Day, today'sEurope day – of the EU). On the basis of that speech, France, Italy, theBenelux countries (Belgium, Netherlands andLuxembourg) together withWest Germany signed theTreaty of Paris (1951) creating theEuropean Coal and Steel Community the following year; this took over the role of theInternational Authority for the Ruhr[37] and lifted some restrictions on German industrial productivity. It gave birth to the first institutions, such as the High Authority (now theEuropean Commission) and the Common Assembly (now theEuropean Parliament). The first presidents of those institutions wereJean Monnet andPaul-Henri Spaak respectively. Thefounding fathers of the European Union understood that coal and steel were the two industries essential for waging war, and believed that by tying their national industries together, a future war between their nations became much less likely.[40] Backed by theMarshall Plan with large funds coming from the United States since 1948, the ECSC became a milestone organization, enabling European economic development and integration and being the origin of the main institutions of the EU such as theEuropean Commission andParliament.[41]
The formation of the European Coal and Steel Community was advanced byAmerican Secretary of StateGeorge C. Marshall. Hisnamesake plan to rebuild Europe in the wake of World War II contributed more than $100 billion in today's[when?] dollars to the Europeans, helping to feed Europeans, deliver steel to rebuild industries, provide coal to warm homes, and construct dams to help provide power. In doing so, the Marshall Plan encouraged the integration of European powers into the European Coal and Steel Community, the precursor to present-day European Union, by illustrating the effects of economic integration and the need for coordination. The potency of the Marshall Plan caused former German ChancellorHelmut Schmidt to remark in 1997 that "America should not forget that the development of the European Union is one of its greatest achievements. Without the Marshall Plan it perhaps would never have come to that."[42][43]
The attempt to turn theSaar protectorate into a "European territory" was rejected by a referendum in 1955. The Saar was to have been governed by a statute supervised by a European Commissioner reporting to the Council of Ministers of theWestern European Union.
The two new communities were created separately from ECSC, although they shared the same courts and the Common Assembly. The executives of the new communities were called Commissions, as opposed to the "High Authority". The EEC was headed byWalter Hallstein (Hallstein Commission) and Euratom was headed byLouis Armand (Armand Commission) and thenÉtienne Hirsch. Euratom would integrate sectors innuclear energy while the EEC would develop acustoms union between members.[44][45][46]
Throughout the 1960s tensions began to show with France seeking to limit supranational power and rejecting the membership of the United Kingdom. However, in 1965 an agreement was reached to merge the three communities under a single set of institutions, and hence theMerger Treaty was signed in Brussels and came into force on 1 July 1967 creating theEuropean Communities.[47]Jean Reypresided over the first merged Commission (Rey Commission).
While the political progress of the Communities was hesitant in the 1960s, this was a fertile period for European legal integration.[48] Many of the foundational legal doctrines of the Court of Justice were first established in landmark decisions during the 1960s and 1970s, above all in theVan Gend en Loos decision of 1963 that declared the "direct effect" ofEuropean law, that is to say, its enforceability before national courts by private parties.[49] Other landmark decisions during this period includedCosta v ENEL, which established the supremacy of European law over national law[50] and the"Dairy Products" decision, which declared that general international law principles of reciprocity and retaliation were prohibited within the European Community.[51] All three of these judgments were made after the appointment of French judgeRobert Lecourt in 1962, and Lecourt appears to have become a dominant influence on the Court of Justice over the 1960s and 1970s.[52]
After much negotiation, and following a change in theFrench Presidency, Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom (withGibraltar) eventually joined the European Communities on 1 January 1973. This was the first of several enlargements which became a major policy area of the Union (see:Enlargement of the European Union).[53]
Recently appointed Commission PresidentJacques Delors (Delors Commission) presided over the adoption of theEuropean flag by the Communities in 1986. In the first major revision ofthe treaties since the Merger Treaty, leaders signed theSingle European Act in February 1986. The text dealt with institutional reform, including extension of community powers – in particular in regarding foreign policy. It was a major component in completing the single market and came into force on 1 July 1987.[56]In 1987Turkey formally applied to join the Community and began the longest application process for any country. After the1988 Polish strikes and thePolish Round Table Agreement, the first small signs of opening in Central Europe appeared. The opening of a border gate between Austria and Hungary at thePan-European Picnic on August 19, 1989, then set in motion a peaceful chain reaction, at the end of which there was no longer a GDR and theEastern Bloc had disintegrated.Otto von Habsburg andImre Pozsgay saw the event as an opportunity to testMikhail Gorbachev`s reaction to an opening of theIron Curtain.[57] In particular, it was examined whether Moscow would give the Soviet troops stationed in Hungary the command to intervene.[58] But with the mass exodus at the Pan-European Picnic, the subsequent hesitant behavior of theSocialist Unity Party of East Germany and the non-intervention of the Soviet Union broke the dams. So the bracket of the Eastern Bloc was broken and as a result theBerlin Wall fell together with the whole Iron Curtain.[59][60]Germany reunified and the door to enlargement to the formerEastern Bloc was opened (See also:Copenhagen Criteria).[61][62]
With a wave of new enlargements on the way, theMaastricht Treaty was signed on 7 February 1992 which established the European Union when it came into force the following year.
Interactive SVG map of the evolution of the European Union
On 1 November 1993, under the thirdDelors Commission, the Maastricht Treaty became effective, creating theEuropean Union with itspillar system, including foreign and home affairs alongside theEuropean Community.[63][64] The1994 European elections were held resulting in theParty of European Socialists maintaining their position as the largest party in Parliament. The Council proposedJacques Santer asCommission President but he was seen as a second choice candidate, undermining his position. Parliament narrowly approved Santer buthis commission gained greater support, being approved by 416 votes to 103. Santer had to use his new powers under Maastricht to flex greater control over his choice of Commissioners. They took office on 23 January 1995.[65]
However, any success was overshadowed by the budget crisis in March 1999. The Parliament refused to approve the commission's 1996community's budget on grounds of financial mismanagement, fraud and nepotism. With Parliament ready to throw them out, the entireSanter Commission resigned.[67][68] The post-Delors mood of euroscepticism became entrenched with the Council and Parliament constantly challenging the commission's position in coming years.[69]
On 10–13 June 2004, the 25 member states participated in the largest trans-national election in history (with the second largest democratic electorate in the world). The result of thesixth Parliamentary election was a second victory for theEuropean People's Party-European Democrats group. It also saw the lowestvoter turnout of 45.5%, the second time it had fallen below 50%.[73] On 22 July 2004,José Manuel Barroso was approved by the new Parliament as the next Commission President. However, his new team of 25 Commissioners faced a tougher road. With Parliament raising objections to a number of his candidates he was forced to withdraw his selection and try once more. The Prodi Commission had to extend their mandate to 22 November after the new line-up of commissioners was finally approved.[74]
A proposedconstitutional treaty was signed byplenipotentiaries from EU member states on 28 October 2004. The document was ratified in most member states, including two positive referendums. Thereferendums that were held in France andthe Netherlands failed however, killing off the treaty. The European Council agreed that the constitution proposal would be abandoned, but most of its changes would be retained in an amending treaty. On 13 December 2007 the treaty was signed, containingopt-outs for the moreeurosceptic members and no state-like elements. The Lisbon treaty finally came into force on 1 December 2009. It created the post ofPresident of the European Council and significantly expanded the post ofHigh Representative. After much debate about what kind of person should be president, the European Council agreed on a low-key personality and choseHerman Van Rompuy while foreign policy-noviceCatherine Ashton became High Representative.
Newest state in yellow
The2009 elections again saw a victory for theEuropean People's Party, despite losing theBritish Conservatives who formed a smaller euroscepticEuropean Conservatives and Reformists grouping with other anti-federalist right wing parties. Parliament's presidency was once again divided between the People's Party and the Socialists, withJerzy Buzek elected as the firstPresident of the European Parliament from an ex-communist country. Barroso was nominated by the council for a second term and received backing from EPP who had declared him as their candidate before the elections. However, the Socialists and Greens led the opposition against him despite not agreeing on an opposing candidate. Parliament finally approved Barroso II, though once more several months behind schedule.
However, trouble developed with existing members as theeurozone entered its first recession in 2008.[77] Members cooperated and the ECB intervened to help restore economic growth and the euro was seen as a safe haven, particularly by those outside such as Iceland.[78][79][80] With the risk of a default inGreece, Ireland, Portugal and other members in late 2009–10, eurozone leaders agreed to provisions for loans to member states who could not raise funds. Accusations that this was a U-turn on the EU treaties, which rule out any bail out of a euro member in order to encourage them to manage their finances better, were countered by the argument that these were loans, not grants, and that neither the EU nor other Member States assumed any liabilities for the debts of the aided countries. WithGreece struggling to restore its finances, other member states also at risk and the repercussions this would have on the rest of the eurozone economy, a loan mechanism was agreed. The crisis also spurred consensus for further economic integration and a range of proposals such as aEuropean Monetary Fund or federal treasury.[81][82][83]
The European Union received the2012 Nobel Peace Prize for having "contributed to the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy andhuman rights in Europe."[84][85] TheNobel Committee stated that "that dreadful suffering inWorld War II demonstrated the need for a new Europe [...] today war between Germany and France is unthinkable. This shows how, through well-aimed efforts and by building up mutual confidence, historical enemies can become close partners."[86] The Nobel Committee's decision was subject to considerable criticism.[87]
On 23 June 2016, the citizens of the United Kingdom voted towithdraw from the European Union in a referendum and subsequently became the first and to date only member to triggerArticle 50 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU). The vote was in favour of leaving the EU by a margin of 51.9% in favour to 48.1% against.[89] The UK's withdrawal was completed on 31 January 2020.
The European Union imposedheavy sanctions on Russia and agreed on a pooled military aid package to Ukraine for lethal weapons funded via theEuropean Peace Facility off-budget instrument.[93][94] Likewise, neighbouring EU member countries received amass influx of Ukrainian refugees fleeing the conflict over the course of the first weeks of the war.[95] The conflict exposed the EU energy dependency on Russia, deemed as a supplier "explicitly" threatening the EU.[96] This development injected a sense of urgency in the switch towards alternative energy suppliers and further development of clean energy sources.[96]
Among the challenges of the European Union is the implementation of theEuropean Green Deal. While among the new challenges there isthe governance of AI that must combine the development of this new technology with the intrinsic risks that it brings to the European Union.[100][101][102]
The European Union must address the new US policy, implemented by Donald Trump's second presidency of the United States in the economic, trade, financial and defense of the European continent. A challenge[103] that places Europe in front of new choices of collaboration and opportunity that requires an unprecedented effort to maintain competitiveness as illustrated in Mario Draghi's report.[104][105]
As of September 2025, despite the efforts of thePresident of the United States, the failure to resolve the war in Ukraine through diplomacy and the pressing need to ensure security both for the part of Ukraine not occupied byRussia and forEurope itself along its entire eastern border, the European Union has adopted a defense plan that calls for strengthening the defenses of individual states in full agreement withNATO.[106][107][108] This plan is becoming increasingly urgent and extraordinary.[109][110]Germany has planned a major rearmament program unseen sinceWorld War II, with major investments in the modernization of its entire defense industry and with the possibility of reinstatement of military conscription.[111][112]Italy has increased its defense industry investments, including in partnership with German defense industry, developing fully or partially shared technologies. The objective is to create the conditions for a unified defense of the European Union, especially fordeterrence against potentially hostile actors, beyond Russia, which is involved in the war with Ukraine. The European Union's defense strategy not only involves strengthening and modernizing the defense sector but also impacts on civilian industries, such as the strengthening of European infrastructure and thespace industry. Furthermore, to be effective and efficient, the European Union's defense strategy requires mutual security guarantees with Russia, as part of the solution to theRusso-Ukrainian War, to ensure a lasting and secure peace between the parties.
Multi-speed Europe is a concept ofdifferentiated integration currently in operation that has recently been given renewed emphasis by a team of independent experts[113] in a report presented at acouncil meeting in Brussels in September 2023.[114][115] "France and Germany are pushing for a larger EU reform before any new member joins the bloc."[116]
^abcdeAlthough not EU treatiesper se, these treaties affected thedevelopment of the EU defence arm, a main part of the CFSP. The Franco-British alliance established by the Dunkirk Treaty wasde facto superseded by WU. The CFSP pillar was bolstered by some of the security structures that had been established within the remit of the 1955Modified Brussels Treaty (MBT). The Brussels Treaty wasterminated in 2011, consequently dissolving the WEU, as themutual defence clause that the Lisbon Treaty provided for EU was considered to render the WEU superfluous. The EU thusde facto superseded the WEU.
^Between the EU's founding in 1993 and consolidation in 2009, the union consisted ofthree pillars, the first of which were the European Communities. The other two pillars consisted of additional areas of cooperation that had been added to the EU's remit.
^Folz, Robert (1969).The concept of empire in Western Europe from the fifth to the fourteenth century. London: Edward Arnold. p. 65.ISBN978-0-7131-5451-1.OCLC59622.
^Schramm, Percy E. (1957).Kaiser, Rom und Renovatio; Studien zur Geschichte des römischen Erneuerungsgedankens vom Ende des karolingischen Reiches bis zum Investiturstreit (in German). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. p. 143.OCLC15021725.
^Nelsen, Brent F.; Guth, James L. (2015).Religion and the Struggle for European Union: Confessional Culture and the Limits of Integration. Georgetown University Press. pp. 48–49.ISBN978-1-62616-070-5.
^Le Goff, Jacques; Le Goff, Jacques (2005).The birth of Europe. The making of Europe (1. publ ed.). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 158–159.ISBN978-0-631-22888-2.
^R. R. Palmer.A History of the Modern World. p. 461.
^Ghervas, Stella (2014). "Antidotes to Empire: From the Congress System to the European Union". In Boyer, John W.; Molden, Berthold (eds.).EUtROPEs. The Paradox of European Empire. University of Chicago Center in Paris. pp. 49–81.ISBN978-2-9525962-6-8.
^Pinterič, Uroš; Prijon, Lea (2013).European Union in 21st Century. University of SS. Cyril and Methodius, Faculty of Social Sciences.ISBN978-80-8105-510-2.
^Blocker, Joel (9 May 1997)."Europe: How The Marshall Plan Took Western Europe From Ruins To Union".Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved20 June 2019.Witness the recent words of former German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt: 'The United States ought not to forget that the emerging European Union is one of its greatest achievements: it would never have happened without the Marshall Plan.' [The "vielleicht" in the original quote is missing in this translation.]
^Lecourt, Robert (1976). L'Europe des juges. Bruxelles, Bruylant. Stein, Eric (1981). 'Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution.' American Journal of International Law 75(1): 1–27. Weiler, Joseph H. H. (1991). 'The Transformation of Europe.' Yale Law Journal 100: 2403–2483.
^ECJ Cases 90&91/63, Commission v Luxembourg & Belgium. See e.g. Phelan, William (2016). 'Supremacy, Direct Effect, and Dairy Products in the Early History of European law.' International Journal of Constitutional Law 14: 6–25.
^W. Phelan, Great Judgments of the European Court of Justice: Rethinking the Landmark Decisions of the Foundational Period (Cambridge, 2019)
^Miklós Németh in Interview, Austrian TV – ORF "Report", 25 June 2019
^"Der 19. August 1989 war ein Test für Gorbatschows" (German – August 19, 1989 was a test for Gorbachev), in: FAZ 19 August 2009.
^Michael Frank: Paneuropäisches Picknick – Mit dem Picknickkorb in die Freiheit (German: Pan-European picnic – With the picnic basket to freedom), in: Süddeutsche Zeitung 17 May 2010.
^Ludwig Greven "Und dann ging das Tor auf", in Die Zeit, 19 August 2014.
^Hoskyns, Catherine; Michael Newman (2000).Democratizing the European Union: Issues for the twenty-first Century (Perspectives on Democratization).Manchester University Press. pp. 106–7.ISBN978-0-7190-5666-6.
^The challenge is summed up by the hope that the Union will not be reduced to being the "only herbivore in a world of carnivores": Flavio Brugnoli,L’unico erbivoro in un mondo di carnivori,L'Indice dei libri del mese, n. 6/2025, p. 14.
Berend, Ivan T.The History of European Integration: A New Perspective. (Routledge, 2016).
Blair, Alasdair.The European Union since 1945 (Routledge, 2014).
Chaban, N. and M. Holland, eds.Communicating Europe in Times of Crisis: External Perceptions of the European Union (2014).
Dedman, Martin.The origins and development of the European Union 1945–1995: a history of European integration (Routledge, 2006).
De Vries, Catherine E. "Don't Mention the War! Second World War Remembrance and Support for European Cooperation."JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies (2019).
Dinan, Desmond.Europe recast: a history of European Union (2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan), 2004excerpt.
Fimister, Alan.Robert Schuman: Neo-Scholastic Humanism and the Reunification of Europe (2008)
Heuser, Beatrice.Brexit in History: Sovereignty or a European Union? (2019)online; also seeonline review
Hobolt, Sara B. "The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent."Journal of European Public Policy (2016): 1–19.
Jorgensen, Knud Erik, et al., eds.The SAGE Handbook of European Foreign Policy (Sage, 2015).
Kaiser, Wolfram. "From state to society? The historiography of European integration." in Michelle Cini, and Angela K. Bourne, eds.Palgrave Advances in European Union Studies (Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2006). pp 190–208.
Koops, TJ. and G. Macaj.The European Union as a Diplomatic Actor (2015).
McCormick, John.Understanding the European Union: a concise introduction (Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).
May, Alex.Britain and Europe since 1945 (1999).
Marsh, Steve, and Hans Mackenstein.The International Relations of the EU (Routledge, 2014).
Milward, Alan S.The Reconstruction of Western Europe: 1945–51 (Univ. of California Press, 1984)
Pasture, Patrick (2015).Imagining European unity since 1000 AD. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.ISBN9781137480460.
Patel, Kiran Klaus, and Wolfram Kaiser. "Continuity and change in European cooperation during the twentieth century."Contemporary European History 27.2 (2018): 165–182.online
Segers, Mathieu.The Origins of European Integration: The Pre-History of Today's European Union, 1937–1951 (Cambridge University Press, 2023)online review of this book
Smith, M.L.; Stirk, P.M.R., eds. (1990).Making The New Europe: European Unity and the Second World War (1st UK ed.). London: Pinter Publishers.ISBN0-86187-777-2.
Stirk, P.M.R., ed. (1989).European Unity in Context: The Interwar Period (1st ed.). London: Pinter Publishers.ISBN9780861879878.
Young, John W.Britain, France, and the unity of Europe, 1945–1951 (Leicester University, 1984).
CLIOH-WORLD CLIOH-WORLD: Network of Universities supported by the European Commission (LLP-Erasmus) for the researching, teaching and learning of the history of the EU, including EU Integration, EU-Turkey dialogue, and linking to world history