Thehistory of Scots law traces the development ofScots law from its early beginnings as a number of different custom systems amongScotland's early cultures to its modern role as one of the threelegal jurisdictions of theUnited Kingdom. The various historic sources of Scots law, including custom, feudal law, canon law, Roman law and English law have created ahybrid or mixed legal system, which shares elements withEnglish law andNorthern Irish law but also has its own unique legal institutions and sources.
The nature of Scots law before the 12th century is largely speculative but most likely was a folk-right system applying a specificcustomary legal tradition to a certain culture inhabiting a certain corresponding area at the time, e.g.Brehon law for the Gaels (Scoti and men ofGalloway andAyrshire),Welsh law forlowland Britons ofYr Hen Ogledd,Udal law for theNorse of Caithness and the islands, andAnglo-Saxon law inLothian and Borders.[1] The earliest preserved Scottish law code is theLeges inter Brettos et Scottos, promulgated underDavid I (r. 1124 – 1153) and regulating Welsh and Gaelic custom. TheLeges Quatuor Burgorum (‘Laws of the Four Burghs’) was promulgated sometime between 1135–57 and regulated Lothian law.
It is difficult to say with any certainty to what degree contemporary Scots law still incorporates these customary sources. There is evidence to suggest that as late as the 17th century marriage laws in theHighlands and Islands still reflected Gaelic custom, contrary toCatholic religious principles.[2] The formation of theKingdom of Scotland and its subjugation of the surrounding cultures, completed by theBattle of Carham, established what is approximately the boundaries of contemporary mainland Scotland.[3] TheOuter Hebrides were added after theBattle of Largs in 1263 and theNorthern Isles were acquired in 1469, completing what is today the legal jurisdiction of Scotland.[4]
In the 12th century KingDavid I began the gradual introduction offeudalism in Scotland and establishedfeudal land tenure over many parts of the south and east, which eventually spread northward.[5][6] As feudalism began to develop in Scotland a number of separate court systems developed.
Sheriffs were appointed by the King in the south and over time spread north. Their scope gradually developed and they were fully established across mainland Scotland by 1300.[7] The sheriffs were originally appointed by the King as royal administrators and tax collectors but their powers grew and as early as 1214 they were holding court to hear a variety of cases.[7][8] Feudal lords were also normally permitted to hold court where disputes between their tenants, including criminal matters, were adjudicated. By the 14th century some of these feudal courts had developed into "petty kingdoms" where the King's courts did not have authority, except for cases of treason.[9]Burghs, towns which had been given this special status usually by the King, also had their own set of local laws dealing mostly with commercial and trade matters. The burghs themselves established their own separate court system by authority of the King to administer and enforce these laws.[10] The burgh laws were collected as theLeges burgorum by 1270, though the laws applied by the burgh courts and the sheriff courts were similar.[11]Ecclesiastical courts also played an important role in Scotland as they had exclusive jurisdiction over matters such as marriage, contracts made on oath, inheritance and legitimacy.[12] These courts, unlike their lay counterparts, were generally staffed by educated men who were trained in bothRoman andCanon law and offered a more sophisticated form of justice. Litigants seem to have preferred to bring disputes before the ecclesiastical courts or an ecclesiastical arbiter rather than the lay courts in Scotland.[13]
During the period of English control over Scotland there is some evidence to suggest that KingEdward I attempted to abolish Scottish laws that were contrary to English law, as he had done in Wales.[14] King Edward I also reformed the legal institutions of Scotland during this period with the organisation of a Scottish government in September 1305. He also sent out pairs of justices, one Englishman and one Scotsman, to oversee different regions in Scotland.[14]
During theWars of Scottish Independence legal developments in Scotland appeared to have slowed, likely affected by the widespread social turmoil. There is some evidence that there were attempts to codify the law of the time and a small number of reformingstatutes were passed by theParliament of Scotland evidencing at least some concern for remedying deficiencies in the law.[15] UnderRobert the Bruce the importance of theParliament of Scotland grew as he called them more frequently and its composition shifted to include more representation from the burghs and lesser landowners.[16] In 1399, a General Council established that the King should hold a parliament at least once a year for the next three years so,"that his subjects are served by the law".[16][17] In 1318, a parliament atScone enacted a code of law that drew upon older practices, but it was also dominated by current events and focused on military matters and the conduct of the war.[18] Nevertheless, the Act also codified procedures for criminal trials and protections forvassals from ejection from the land.[19]
Scotland's three oldest universities, theUniversity of St Andrews, theUniversity of Glasgow and theUniversity of Aberdeen were also founded following the wars and theEducation Act 1496 was passed requiring those who administered justice in Scotland to learn Latin and study law for at least 3 years at school.[15][20]
From the 14th century we have surviving examples of early Scottish legal literature, such as theRegiam Majestatem (on procedure at the royal courts) and theQuoniam Attachiamenta (on procedure at the baron courts).[21] Both of these important texts, as they were copied, had provisions fromRoman law and theius commune inserted or developed, demonstrating the influence which both these sources had on Scots law.[22]
.jpg)
TheStewart dynasty, founded by KingRobert II in 1371, was defined by the growing authority and power of theScottish Kings and development of existing legal institutions. In 1469, the Parliament of Scotland affirmed the ultimate authority of KingJames III and rejected the authority of imperialnotaries in Scottish civil matters.[23] The recognition of the sovereign authority of the Scottish Kings was connected to the influence of theius commune in Scots law.[23] For example, thePragmatic Sanction of Bourges of 1438 was an attempt to limit papal authority in France and recognise the sovereign authority of KingCharles VII of France. Various customary laws, such as theLaw of Clan MacDuff, came under attack from the Stewart Dynasty which consequently extended the reach of Scots common law.[24]
From the reign of KingJames I to KingJames V the beginnings of a legal profession began to develop and the administration of criminal and civil justice was centralised.[25] The Parliament of Scotland was normally called on an annual basis during this period, with the notable exception of KingJames IV, and its membership was further defined.[26] The number ofburghs also continued to expand, including the introduction ofburghs of barony, and their authority remained largely undisturbed.[27] The evolution of the modernCourt of Session also traces its history to the 15th and early 16th century with the establishment of a specialised group of councillors to the King evolving from the King's Council who dealt solely with the administration of justice. In 1528, it was established that the Lords of Council not appointed to this body were to be excluded from its audiences and it was also this body that four years later in 1532 became theCollege of Justice.[28]
The growing activity of the parliament and the centralisation of administration in Scotland called for the better dissemination of Acts of the parliament to the courts and other enforcers of the law. There was still a great reliance on the old laws, codified in theRegiam Majestatem andQuoniam Attachiamenta among others, which persisted.[29] Throughout the late 15th century various unsuccessful attempts were made to form commissions of experts to codify, update or define Scots law.[30] The legal uncertainty which this situation created prompted increased reliance on theius commune found inCanon law and there are a number of examples of statutes from this period which clearly drew fromRoman law.[31]
Men educated in the law also became increasingly important alongside the early development of theCollege of Justice andecclesiastical courts, filling the need for experts in advocacy, pleading and court procedure. The study of law was popular in Scotland and many students travelled to Continental Europe to studycanon law andcivil law.[32] In 1532, when the College of Justice established rules of practice and a closed list of ten lawyers permitted to appear before them, six had studied law abroad.[33] This also expanded the influence of Roman law and theius commune on the Scottish common law. The general practice during this period, as evidenced from records of cases, seems to have been to defer to specific Scottish laws on a matter when available and to fill in any gaps with provisions from theius commune embodied in civil and canon law, which had the advantage of being written.[34]
TheAct of Union 1707 unified theKingdom of Scotland and theKingdom of England to formGreat Britain. Article 19 of the Act confirmed the continuing authority of theCollege of Justice,Court of Session andCourt of Justiciary in Scotland.[35][36] Article 3, however, merged theParliament of Scotland with theParliament of England to form theParliament of Great Britain, with its seat in thePalace of Westminster,London.[37]
TheParliament of Great Britain was now unrestricted in altering laws concerningpublic right, policy and civil government, but concerningprivate right, only alterations for theevident utility of the subjects within Scotland were permitted. TheScottish Enlightenment then reinvigorated Scots law as a university-taught discipline. The transfer of legislative power to London and the introduction of appeal to theHouse of Lords (now to theSupreme Court of the United Kingdom) brought further English influence.[citation needed] In the nineteenth century new areas of public policy that had not been part of Scottish law, in areas such as public health, working conditions, the protection of investors, were legislated for by the British Parliament, challenging the uniqueness of the system.[38] Acts of the Parliament began to create unified legal statutes applying in both England and Scotland, particularly when conformity was seen as necessary for pragmatic reasons (such as theSale of Goods Act 1893). Appeal decisions by English judges raised concerns about this appeal to a foreign system, and in the late 19th century Acts allowed for the appointment ofScottish Lords of Appeal in Ordinary. At the same time, a series of cases made it clear that no appeal lay from the High Court of Justiciary to the House of Lords.[citation needed]
Today theSupreme Court of the United Kingdom usually has a minimum of two Scottish justices to ensure that some Scottish experience is brought to bear on Scottish appeals.[39] Scots law has continued to change and develop, with the most significant change coming underdevolution and the formation of theScottish Parliament in 1999.[citation needed]