For most of its history, what is todayBelgium was either a part of a larger territory, such as the medievalCarolingian Empire, or was divided into a number of smaller states. Due to its strategic location as a country in contact between different cultures, Belgium has historically been called the "crossroads of Europe", and for the many armies fighting on its soil, it has also been called the "battlefield of Europe"[1] or the "cockpit of Europe".[2]
The first half of the twentieth century was tumultuous. Its historic neutrality was violated in each of the World Wars. During World War I, frustrated German invaders launched theRape of Belgium. During the 1940 invasion, the quick surrender byLeopold III of Belgium to German forces drove a wedge between the King and his people. The King's attempt to return led to aconstitutional crisis in 1950, which led to his abdication in favor of his sonBaudouin. Belgium entered the second half of the twentieth century showing an unprecedented era of economic growth, as Belgium took an active role in the formation of theBenelux customs union with its neighbors. Ultimately, the Benelux union would serve as a model for theEuropean Economic Community, a precursor to theEuropean Union; to this dayBrussels serves as the seat of many of the European Union institutions.
Domestically, the country has faced divisions overdifferences of language andunequal economic development. This ongoing antagonism has causedfar-reaching reforms since the 1970s. It is now divided into three regions: Dutch-speakingFlanders in the north, French-speakingWallonia in the south, and bilingual Brussels in the middle. Since the 1990s, Belgium has become involved in several international conflicts, under the aegis of various United Nations peacekeeping forces, including theRwandan Civil War, the ongoing civil wars inSomalia, theKosovo War, and several others. Environmental concerns came to a head in theDioxin affair, bringing down the Belgian government ofJean-Luc Dehaene's premiership. Since then, the Belgian political landscape has become increasingly politically fragmented; after the2010 Belgian federal election, it took nearly a year toform a government, and in more recent elections a growing right-wingFlemish nationalist movement has had a strong influence over domestic politics.
Belgium and Flanders were the first two common names used for the Burgundian Netherlands which was the predecessor of the Austrian Netherlands, the predecessor of Belgium.[3] TheCounty of Flanders was the original foothold of the Burgundian dukes in the region, to which other territories were later attached.
"Belgium" is originally a Latin term used by Julius Caesar,[4] referring to an area now mostly in Northern France, where the tribes ruling the military alliance of theBelgae lived.[5][6] Under Roman rule, this region was the equivalent of the province ofBelgica Secunda, which stretched into the coastal Flemish part of modern Belgium.
In late Roman and medieval times, the term Belgium tended to be used to refer to RomanBelgica Prima, and its successorUpper Lotharingia, in theMoselle region of Germany, Luxembourg and France. Only slowly, in modern times, did the old term start to be used for the area to the north of the two RomanBelgica provinces, now the Netherlands and Belgium. A key turning point, when it was used specifically to refer to the southern part of the Netherlands, was during theBrabant Revolution in 1790. This terminology was revived after the better known revolution of 1830, when modern Belgium broke out of the post-WaterlooUnited Kingdom of the Netherlands.
On Belgian territoryNeanderthal fossils were discovered atEngis in 1829–30 and elsewhere, some dating back to at least 100,000 BC.[7]
The earliestNeolithic farming technology of northern Europe, the so-calledLBK culture, reached the east of Belgium at its furthest northwesterly stretch from its origins in southeast Europe. Its expansion stopped in theHesbaye region of eastern Belgium around 5000 BC. The Belgian LBK is notable for its use of defensive walls around villages.[8][9][10]
So-called "Limburg pottery" and "La Hoguette pottery" are styles which stretch into northwestern France and the Netherlands, but it has sometimes been argued that these technologies are the result of pottery technology spreading beyond the original LBK farming population and being made by hunter gatherers.[11] A slightly later-starting Neolithic culture found in central Wallonia is the so-called "Groupe de Blicquy", which may represent an offshoot of the LBK settlers. One notable archaeological site in this region is theNeolithic flint mines of Spiennes.[9]
Farming in Belgium failed to take permanent hold at first. The LBK and Blicquy cultures disappeared and there is a long gap before a new farming culture, theMichelsberg culture, appeared and became widespread. Hunter gatherers of theSwifterbant culture apparently remained in the sandy north of Belgium, but apparently became more and more influenced by farming and pottery technology.[9]
In the third and late fourth millennia BC, the whole of Flanders shows relatively little evidence of human habitation.[12] TheSeine-Oise-Marne culture spread into the Ardennes, and is associated with megalithic sites there (for exampleWéris), but did not disperse over all of Belgium. To the north and east, in the Netherlands, a semi-sedentary culture group has been proposed to have existed, the so-called Vlaardingen-Wartburg-Stein complex, which possibly developed from the above-mentioned Swifterbant and Michelsburg cultures.[13] The same pattern continues into the late Neolithic and earlyBronze Age. In the last part of the Neolithic, evidence is found for theCorded Ware andBell Beaker cultures in the south of the Netherlands.
The population of Belgium started to increase permanently with the late Bronze Age from around 1750 BC. Three possibly related European cultures arrived in sequence. First theUrnfield culture arrived, then, coming into theIron Age, theHallstatt culture, and theLa Tène culture. All three of these are associated withIndo-European languages. From 500 BCCeltic tribes settled in the region and traded with theMediterranean world. From c. 150 BC, the first coins came into use.
The exact nature of the distinction between the Belgae to the North and the Celts to the south, and the Germani across the Rhine, is disputed.[14] Caesar said that the Belgae were separated from the rest of Gaul by language, law and custom, and he also said they had Germanic ancestry. On the other hand, linguists have proposed that there is evidence that the northern part of the Belgic population had previously spoken anIndo-European language related to, but distinct from,Celtic andGermanic (seeBelgian language andNordwestblock).[14]
The leaders of the Belgic alliance which Caesar confronted were in modern France, theSuessiones,Viromandui andAmbiani and perhaps some of their neighbours, in an area that he appears to distinguish as the true "Belgium" of classical times.[15] Concerning the territory of modern Belgium, he reported that the more northerly allies of the Belgae, from west to east theMenapii,Nervii, andGermani cisrhenani, were less economically developed and more warlike, similar to theGermani east of the Rhine river. The Menapii and northern Germani lived among low thorny forests, islands and swamps, and the central Belgian Nervii lands were deliberately planted with thick hedges to be impenetrable to cavalry. There is also less archaeological evidence of large settlements and trade in the area.
Modern linguists use the word "germanic" to refer to languages but it is not known for sure whether even the BelgianGermani spoke aGermanic language, and their tribal and personal names are clearly Celtic. Archaeologists have also had difficulty finding evidence of the exact migrations from east of the Rhine which Caesar reports and more generally there has been skepticism about using him in this way due to the political motives of his commentaries. But the archaeological record gives the impression that the classical BelgianGermani were a relatively stable population going back toUrnfield times, with a more recently immigrated elite class.[16]
The Menapii and Nervii flourished within theRoman province ofGallia Belgica, along with the southern Belgae and theTreveri. These Roman provinces were broken intocivitates, each with a capital city, and each representing one of the major tribal groups named by Caesar. At first, only one,Tongeren capital of the Tungri, was in modern Belgium. Later, the capital of the Menapii was moved fromCassel in modern France toTournai in Belgium. The Nervian capital was in the south of the territory in modern France, atBavay, and later moved toCambrai.Trier, the capital of the Treveri, is today in Germany.
The northeastern corner of this province, including Tongeren and the area of the earlierGermani, was united with the militarized Rhine border to form a newer province known asGermania Inferior,[17] with capital Colonia Agrippina (Cologne in Germany).[17] EmperorDiocletian restructured the provinces around 300, and split the remaining Belgica into two provinces:Belgica Prima andBelgica Secunda. Belgica Prima was the eastern part and had Trier as its main city, and included part of the Belgian province of Luxembourg. It became one of the most important Roman cities in Western Europe in the 3rd century.
Christianity was introduced to Belgium during the late-Roman period, and the first known bishop in the regionServatius taught in the middle of the Fourth century inTongeren.
In the Middle Ages, the old Romancivitates became the basis of Christian dioceses, and the row of dioceses which form the core of modern Belgium (Tournai, Cambrai, and Liège) were the most northerly continental areas to retain a Romanized culture. The modern Belgian language boundary derives from this period, as the area was a contact point of Frankish and Romanized populations.
As theWestern Roman Empire lost power,Germanic tribes came to dominate the military, and then form kingdoms. Coastal Flanders, the old territory of the Menapii, became part of the "Saxon Shore". In inland northern Belgium,Franks from the Roman frontier in the Rhine delta were allowed to re-settle inToxandria in the 4th century. Wallonia remained more heavily Romanized, although it eventually became subject to Franks in the 5th century. Franks remained important in the Roman military, and the Romanized FrankishMerovingian Dynasty eventually took over northern France.Clovis I, the best-known king of this dynasty, first conquered Romanized northern France, later calledNeustria, then turned north to the Frankish lands later referred to asAustrasia, which included all or most of Belgium. Christian missionaries preached to the populace and started a wave ofconversion.
Southern part of theLow Countries with bishopry towns and abbeys c. 7th century.Abbeys were the onset to larger villages and even some towns to reshape the landscape.
TheVikings raided widely throughout this period, but a major settlement that had caused problems in the area of Belgium was defeated in 891 byArnulf of Carinthia in thebattle of Leuven.
The Frankish lands were divided and reunified several times under theMerovingian andCarolingian dynasties, but eventually were firmly divided intoFrance and theHoly Roman Empire. The parts of theCounty of Flanders west of the riverScheldt became part of France during the Middle Ages, but the remainders of the County of Flanders and theLow Countries were part of the Holy Roman Empire, specifically thestem duchy ofLower Lotharingia, which had a period as an independent kingdom.
Through the early Middle Ages, the northern part of present-day Belgium (Flanders) was aGermanic language-speaking area, whereas in the southern part people had continued to be Romanized and spoke derivatives ofVulgar Latin.
As the Holy Roman emperors and French kings lost effective control of their domains in the 11th and 12th centuries, the territory more or less corresponding to the present Belgium was divided into relatively independent feudal states, including:
ThePrince-Bishopric of Liège (the territory over which the bishop ruled as a lord, which was smaller than the diocese)
The coastal county of Flanders was one of the wealthiest parts of Europe in the late Middle Ages, from trading with England, France and Germany, and it became culturally important. During the 11th and 12th centuries, theRheno-Mosan orMosan art movement flourished in the region moving its centre fromCologne andTrier toLiège,Maastricht andAachen.
In this period, many cities, includingYpres,Bruges andGhent, obtained theircity charter. TheHanseatic League stimulated trade in the region, and the period saw the erection of manyGothic cathedrals and city halls.[18] With the decline of the Holy Roman emperors' power starting in the 13th century, the Low Countries were largely left to their own devices. The lack of imperial protection also meant that the French and English began vying for influence.
In 1214, KingPhilip II of France defeated the Count of Flanders in theBattle of Bouvines and forced his submission to the French crown. Through the remainder of the 13th century, French control over Flanders steadily increased until 1302 when an attempt at total annexation by Philip IV met a stunning defeat when Count Guy humiliated the French knights at theBattle of the Golden Spurs. Philip launched a new campaign that ended with the inconclusiveBattle of Mons-en-Pévèle in 1304. The king imposed harsh peace terms on Flanders, which included ceding the important textile-making centers ofLille andDouai.
Thereafter, Flanders remained a French tributary until the start of theHundred Years' War in 1337. Paris's influence in the Low Countries was counterbalanced by England, which maintained important ties to the coastal ports and came to dominate the wool-shipping business. Flemish cloth remained a highly valued product, highly dependent on English wool. Any interruption in the supply of that invariably resulted in riots and violence from the weavers' guilds. Flanders received imports from other areas of Europe, but itself purchased little abroad except wine from Spain and France.Bruges became a great commercial center after the Hanseatic League set up business there. From early on, the Low Countries began to develop as a commercial and manufacturing center. Merchants became the dominant class in the towns, with the nobility largely limited to countryside estates.
Especially during the Burgundy period (the 15th and 16th centuries),Tournai,Bruges,Ypres,Ghent,Brussels, andAntwerp took turns at being major European centers for commerce, industry (especially textiles) and art. Bruges had a strategic location at the crossroads of the northernHanseatic League trade and the southern trade routes. Bruges was already included in the circuit of the Flemish and French cloth fairs at the beginning of the 13th century, but when the old system of fairs broke down the entrepreneurs of Bruges innovated. They developed, or borrowed from Italy, new forms of merchant capitalism. They employed new forms of economic exchange, including bills of exchange (i.e. promissory notes) and letters of credit.[19] Antwerp eagerly welcomed foreign traders, most notably the Portuguese pepper and spice traders.[20][21]
In art theRenaissance was represented by theFlemish Primitives, a group of painters active primarily in the Southern Netherlands in the 15th and early 16th centuries, and theFranco-Flemish composers. Flemish tapestries and, in the 16th and 17th centuries,Brussels tapestry hung on the walls of castles throughout Europe. The Burgundian princes enhanced their political prestige with economic growth and artistic splendour. These "Great Dukes of the West" were effectively sovereigns, with domains extending from the Zuiderzee to the Somme. The urban and other textile industries, which had developed in the Belgian territories since the 12th century, became the economic center of northwestern Europe.
ThePragmatic Sanction of 1549, issued by Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, established the so-calledSeventeen Provinces, as an entity on its own, apart from the Empire and from France. This comprised all of Belgium, present-day northeastern France, present-day Luxembourg, and present-day Netherlands, except for the lands of thePrince-Bishop of Liège. In Brussels on 25 October 1555, Charles V abdicated Belgica Regia to his son, who in January 1556 assumed the throne of Spain as Philip II.
The Sack of Antwerp in 1576, in which 17,000 people died.[22]Siege and capture of Tournai, 1581The Siege of Maastricht (1579) by an anonymous painterTheBattle of Nieuwpoort (1600)
The northern part of Belgica Regia, comprising seven provinces and eventually forming the Dutch Republic, became increasinglyProtestant (specifically,Calvinist), while the larger part comprising the ten southern provinces remained primarily Catholic. This schism, and other cultural differences which had been present since ancient times, launched theUnion of Atrecht in the Belgian regions, later followed by theUnion of Utrecht in the northern regions. WhenPhilip II ascended the Spanish throne he tried to abolish all Protestantism. Portions of Belgica Regia revolted, eventually resulting in theEighty Years' War (1568–1648) betweenSpain and theDutch Republic.[23] The horrors of this war—massacres, religious violence, mutinies—were precursors to theThirty Years' War (1618–1648) with which it would merge.
After theIconoclastic Fury of 1566, Spanish authorities were able to largely gain control of the Low Countries. The most notable event of this period was theBattle of Oosterweel, in which Spanish forces destroyed an army of Dutch Calvinists. King Philip II sent inFernando Álvarez de Toledo, 3rd Duke of Alba, as Governor-General of theSpanish Netherlands from 1567 to 1573. Alba established a special court called theCouncil of Troubles (nicknamed the "Council of Blood"). The Blood Council's reign of terror saw it condemn thousands of people to death without due process and drive the nobles into exile while seizing their property. Alba boasted that he had burned or executed 18,600 persons in the Netherlands, in addition to the far greater number he massacred during the war, many of them women and children; 8,000 persons were burned or hanged in one year, and Alba's Flemish victims totalled at least 50,000.[24]
TheDutch Revolt spread to the south in the mid-1570s after theArmy of Flanders mutinied for lack of pay and went on the rampage in several cities. At theBattle of Gembloux, on January 31, 1578, the Dutch were followed byDon Juan of Austria, who sent forward a picked force that attacked the rearguard and dispersed it, and then, falling suddenly upon the main body, utterly routed it, killing at least 10,000 rebels.[25] Don Juan of Austria died on October 1, 1578, and was succeeded byAlexander Farnese, Duke of Parma.
With the arrival of large numbers of troops from Spain, Farnese began a campaign of reconquest in the south.[26] He took advantage of the divisions in the ranks of his opponents between the Dutch-speaking Flemish and the Walloon-speaking south to foment growing discord.[27] By doing so he was able to bring back the Walloon provinces to an allegiance to the king. By thetreaty of Arras in 1579, he secured the support of the "Malcontents", as the Catholic nobles of the south were styled. The seven northern provinces, controlled by Calvinists, responded with theUnion of Utrecht, where they resolved to stick together to fight Spain. Farnese secured his base inHainaut andArtois, then moved againstBrabant andFlanders. He captured many rebel towns in the south:[28]Maastricht (1579),Tournai (1581),Oudenaarde (1582),Dunkirk (1583),Bruges (1584), andGhent (1584).[27]
On August 17, 1585, Farnese laid siege toAntwerp. Antwerp was one of the richest cities in northern Europe and a rebel stronghold ever since Spanish and Walloon troopssacked it in 1576. The city was open to the sea, strongly fortified, and well defended under the leadership ofMarnix van St. Aldegonde. Engineer Sebastian Baroccio cut off all access to the sea by constructing abridge of boats across theScheldt. The Dutch sailed fireships, calledHellburners,[a] against the bridge and blew up a 200-foot-long span andkilled 800 Spaniards. The besiegers repaired the damage, however, and pressed the investment.The city surrendered in 1585 as 60,000 Antwerp citizens (60% of the pre-siege population) fled north.[27]Brussels,Mechelen andGeertruidenberg fell the same year.Farnese's strategy was to offer generous terms for surrender: there would be no massacres or looting; historic urban privileges were retained; there was a full pardon and amnesty; return to the Catholic Church would be gradual.[27] Catholic refugees from the North regrouped in Cologne and Douai and developed a more militant,tridentine identity. They became the mobilising forces of a popularCounter-Reformation in the South, thereby facilitating the eventual emergence of the state of Belgium.[29]
In 1601, the Spanishbesieged Ostend, producing more than 100,000 casualties before Ostend finally fell in 1604. While the former northern part of Belgica Regia, theSeven United Provinces, gained independence,Southern Belgica Regia remained under the rule of Spain (1556–1713). The southern part spoke various romance languages and the northern part used Dutch, yet court accounts were kept inSpanish.
During the 17th century, Antwerp continued to be blockaded by the Dutch but became a major European center for industry and art. TheBrueghels,Peter Paul Rubens andVan Dyck'sbaroque paintings were created during this period.
After theFranco-Spanish War (1635–1659), Spain shifted most of its troops out of Belgium to Iberia. From 1659, Madrid increasingly relied on the aid of allied armies to restrain French ambitions to annex theSpanish Netherlands.[30] UnderLouis XIV (1643–1715), France pursued an expansionist policy. France frequently held control of territories in the Southern Netherlands, confronted by various opponents including the Netherlands and Austria. There was theWar of Devolution (1667–1668), theFranco-Dutch War (1672–1678), theWar of the Reunions (1683–1684), and theNine Years' War (1688–1697). These were then followed by theWar of the Spanish Succession (1701–1714), much of which was fought on Belgian soil. After the victory of Austria and its allies, under the 1714Treaty of Rastatt, the Belgian and present-day Luxembourg territories (except the lands under the lordship of thePrince-Bishop of Liège) were transferred to theAustrian Habsburgs, thus forming theAustrian Netherlands (1714–1797).[31]
TheBrabant Revolution of 1789–1790 (also known as the Belgian Revolution of 1789–1790) overlapped with theFrench Revolution, and called for independence fromAustrian rule. Brabant rebels, under the command ofJean-André van der Mersch, defeated the Austrians at theBattle of Turnhout and founded theUnited States of Belgium together with the Prince Bishopric of Liège. The new state was beset by factionalism between the radical "Vonckists", led byJan Frans Vonck and the more conservative "Statists" ofHenri Van der Noot. Businessmen with widescale operations generally supported the Statists, while the Vonckists attracted small business and members of the trade guilds. They called for independence from Austria but were conservative in social and religious questions.[32] By November 1790, the revolt had been crushed and the Habsburg monarchy had returned to power.[33]
New rulers were sent in by Paris. Belgian men were drafted into the French wars and heavily taxed. Resistance was strong in every sector, as Belgian nationalism emerged to oppose French rule. The French legal system, however, was adopted, with its equal legal rights, and abolition of class distinctions. Belgium now had a government bureaucracy selected by merit, but it was not at all popular.[34] Until the establishment of theConsulate in 1799, Catholics were heavily repressed by the French. The firstUniversity of Leuven was closed in 1797 and churches were plundered.
During this early period of the French rule, the Belgian economy was completely paralyzed as taxes had to be paid in gold and silver coin while goods bought by the French were paid for with worthlessassignats. During this period of systematic exploitation, about 800,000 Belgians fled the Southern Netherlands.[35] The French occupation of Belgium led to further suppression of the Dutch language across the country: French became the only accepted language in public life as well as in economic, political, and social affairs.[36] The measures of the successive French governments and in particular the 1798 massiveconscription into the French army were unpopular everywhere, especially in Flemish regions, where it sparked thePeasants' War.[37] The brutal suppression of the Peasants' War marks the starting point of the modernFlemish movement.[38]France promoted commerce and capitalism, paving the way for the ascent of the bourgeoisie and the rapid growth of manufacturing and mining. In economics, therefore, the nobility declined while the middle class Belgian entrepreneurs flourished because of their inclusion in a large market, paving the way for Belgium's leadership role after 1815 in theIndustrial Revolution.[39][40] Godechot finds that after the annexation, Belgium's business community supported the new regime, unlike the peasants, who remained hostile. Annexation opened new markets in France for wool and other goods from Belgium. Bankers and merchants helped finance and supply the French army. France ended theprohibition against seaborne trade on the Scheldt that had been enforced by the Netherlands. Antwerp quickly became a major French port with a world trade, and Brussels grew as well.[41][42]In 1814, the Allies drove out Napoleon and ended French rule. The plan was to join Belgium and the Netherlands, under Dutch control. Napoleon returned to power briefly during theHundred Days in 1815, but on his way to recapturing Brussels as his intended power base, was finally defeated at theBattle of Waterloo, 12 miles (19 km) south of that city.
Theenlightened despot William I, who reigned from 1815 to 1840, had almost unlimited constitutional power, the constitution having been written by a number of notable people chosen by him. As despot, he had no difficulty in accepting some of the changes resulting from the social transformation of the previous 25 years, including equality of all before the law. However, he resurrected theestates as a political class and elevated a large number of people to the nobility. Voting rights were still limited, and only the nobility were eligible for seats in the upper house.
William I was aCalvinist and intolerant of the Roman Catholic majority in the southern parts of his newly created kingdom. He promulgated the "Fundamental Law of Holland", with some modifications. This suppressed the clergy, abolished the privileges of the Roman Catholic Church, and guaranteed equal protection to every religious creed and the same civil and political rights to every subject. It reflected the spirit of the French Revolution and in so doing displeased the bishops in the south.[43]
William I actively promoted economic modernization. His authority was shared with a legislature partly chosen by himself and partly elected by the more prosperous citizens under the constitution. Government was in the hands of national ministries of state, and the old provinces were reestablished in name only. The government was now fundamentally unitary, and all authority flowed from the center. The first fifteen years of the Kingdom showed progress and prosperity, as industrialization proceeded rapidly in the south, where theIndustrial Revolution allowed entrepreneurs and labor to combine in a new textile industry, powered by local coal mines. There was little industry in the northern provinces, but most of the former Dutch overseas colonies were restored, and highly profitable trade resumed after a 25-year hiatus. Economic liberalism combined with moderate monarchical authoritarianism to accelerate the adaptation of the Netherlands to the new conditions of the 19th century.
Protestants controlled the new country, although they formed only a quarter of the population.[b] In theory, Roman Catholics had full legal equality; in practice few held high state or military offices. The king insisted that schools in the South end their traditional teaching of Roman Catholic doctrine, even though almost everyone there was of that faith.[44] Socially, the French-speaking Walloons strongly resented the king's policy to make Dutch the language of government. There was also growing outrage at the king's insensitivity to social differences. According toSchama, there was growing hostility to the Dutch government.[45]
Political liberals in the south had their own grievances, especially regarding the king's authoritarian style; he seemed uncaring about the issue of regionalism, flatly vetoing a proposal for a French-language teacher-training college in francophoneLiège. Finally, all factions in the South complained of unfair representation in the national legislature. The south was industrializing faster and was more prosperous than the north, leading to resentment of northern arrogance and political domination.
The outbreak ofrevolution in France in 1830 was used as a signal for revolt. The demand at first was Home Rule for "Belgium", as the southern provinces were now being called, rather than separation. Eventually, revolutionaries began demanding total independence.[46]
TheBelgian Revolution broke out in August 1830 when crowds, stirred by a performance ofAuber'sLa Muette de Portici at the Brussels opera house ofLa Monnaie, spilled out onto the streets singing patriotic songs. Violent street fighting soon broke out. The liberal bourgeoisie, who had initially been at the forefront of the burgeoning revolution, were appalled by the violence and became willing to accept a compromise with the Dutch.[47]
On a political level, the Belgians felt significantly under-represented in the Netherlands' elected Lower Assembly and disliked the unpopular Prince of Orange, the futureWilliam II who was the representative of KingWilliam I in Brussels. The French-speakingWalloons also felt ostracised in a majority Dutch-speaking country. There were also significant religious grievances felt by the majority Catholic Belgians.
The king assumed the protest would blow over. He announced an amnesty for all revolutionaries, except foreigners and the leaders. When this did not succeed he sent in the army. Dutch forces were able to penetrate theSchaerbeek Gate into Brussels, but the advance was stalled in theParc de Bruxelles under sniper fire. Royal troops elsewhere met determined resistance from revolutionaries at makeshift barricades. It is estimated that there were no more than 1,700 revolutionaries (described by the French Ambassador as an "undisciplined rabble"[39]) in Brussels at the time, faced with over 6,000 Dutch troops. However, faced with strong opposition, Dutch troops were ordered out of the capital on the night of 26 September. There were also battles around the country as revolutionaries clashed with Dutch forces. Eight Dutch warships bombarded Antwerp following its capture by revolutionary forces.
Belgian independence was not allowed by the 1815Congress of Vienna; nevertheless the revolutionaries were regarded sympathetically by the major powers of Europe. In November 1830, theLondon Conference of 1830 or "Belgian Congress" (comprising delegates from Great Britain, France, Russia, Prussia and Austria) ordered an armistice on November 4. At the end of November Britain and France proposed no military intervention and the establishment of an independent kingdom of Belgium, which was accepted by the other three more conservative participants, who had favored a military intervention.[48] A protocol signed on 20 January 1831 stated that Belgium would be formed of the regions that did not belong to the North in 1790. The new kingdom would be obliged to remain neutral in foreign affairs. The British foreign secretaryLord Palmerston strongly backed the Prince of Orange as the new king. The Prince proved to be unacceptable to William I, his father, as well as to the French. Finally, Palmerston came up with his second choice,Leopold I of Saxe-Coburg, who was accepted by all.[49] On July 21, 1831, the first "King of the Belgians" was inaugurated. The date of his acceptance of the constitution – 21 July 1831 – is marked a national holiday.[50]
Theliberal bourgeoisie hastily formed a provisional government underCharles Rogier to negotiate with the Dutch, officially declaring Belgian independence on 4 October 1830. TheBelgian National Congress was formed to draw up a constitution. Under the new constitution, Belgium became a sovereign, independent state with aconstitutional monarchy. However, the constitution severely limitedvoting rights to the French-speakinghaute-bourgeoisie and the clergy, in a country where French was not the majority language. The Catholic church was afforded a good deal of freedom from state intervention.
The state of conflict (but not open warfare) with the Netherlands lasted another eight years, but in 1839, theTreaty of London was signed between the two countries and the fivegreat powers of Europe (Austria,France,Prussia,Russia, and theUnited Kingdom). By the treaty of 1839, the eastern part ofLuxembourg did not join Belgium, but remained a possession of the Netherlands until different inheritance laws caused it to separate as an independentGrand Duchy (the western, French-speaking part of Luxembourg became the Belgian province of that name). Belgium lost EasternLimburg,Zeelandic Flanders,French Flanders andEupen. The Netherlands retained the former two while French Flanders remained in French possession. Eupen remained within theGerman Confederation. The five great powers pledged to protect Belgium's neutrality in the future.[51] In 1914, the violation of Belgium's neutrality would be the statedCasus belli of Britain's entry into World War I.[52]
Most of society was highly traditional, especially in rural areas, and the quality of education was low.[53] Nevertheless, Belgium was the second country, after Britain, in which the industrial revolution took place. It developed into an open economy focused on industrial exports with strong ties between the banking sector and industry.[54]Industrialization took place inWallonia starting in the mid-1820s, and especially after 1830. The availability of cheap coal was a main factor that attracted entrepreneurs. Coke blast furnaces as well as puddling and rolling mills were built in the coal mining areas aroundLiège andCharleroi. The leader was a transplanted Englishman,John Cockerill. His factories atSeraing integrated all stages of production, from engineering to the supply of raw materials, as early as 1825.[55]
Industry spread through theSillon industriel ("industrial district"),Haine,Sambre andMeuse valleys.[56] By 1830 when iron became important the Belgian coal industry had been long-established, and used steam engines for pumping. Coal was sold to local mills and railways as well as to France and Prussia. The textile industry, based on cotton and flax, employed about half of the industrial workforce for much of the industrial period.Ghent was the premier industrial city in Belgium until the 1880s, when the center of growth moved toLiège, with its steel industry.[57]
Wallonia had rich coalfields over much of its area. Deep mines were not required at first so there were a large number of small operations. There was a complex legal system for concessions; often multiple layers had different owners. Entrepreneurs started going deeper and deeper (thanks to the innovation of steam pumping). In 1790, the maximum depth of mines was 220 meters. By 1856, the average depth in the area west ofMons was 361, and in 1866, some pits had reached down 700 and 900 meters; one was 1,065 meters deep, probably the deepest coal mine in Europe at this time. Gas explosions were a serious problem, and Belgium had high fatality rates. By the late 19th century the seams were becoming exhausted and the steel industry was importing some coal from the Ruhr.[58]
Cheap and readily available coal attracted firms producing metals and glass, both of which required considerable amounts of coal, and so regions around coal fields became highly industrialised. TheSillon industriel, and in particular thePays Noir aroundCharleroi, were the centre of the steel industry until the Second World War.
The nation provided an ideal model for showing the value of the railways for speeding the Industrial Revolution. After 1830, the new nation decided to stimulate industry. It funded a simple cross-shaped system that connected the major cities, ports and mining areas, and linked to neighboring countries. Belgium thus became the railway center of the region. The system was very soundly built along British lines, so that profits and wages were low but the infrastructure necessary for rapid industrial growth was put in place. Léopold I went on to build thefirst railway in continental Europe in 1835, between Brussels andMechelen.[59] The development of smaller railways in Belgium, notably theLiège–Jemappes line, was launched by tendering contracts to private companies which "became the model for the extension of small local railways all over the low countries."[60]
By the 1900s, Belgium was a major exporter of trams and other rail components, exporting vast quantities of railway materials. In South America, 3,800 kilometers of track were owned by Belgian firms, with a further 1,500 kilometers inChina.[60] One Belgian entrepreneur,Édouard Empain, known as the "Tramway King", built many public transport systems across the world, including theParis Métro.[61]
Before the arrival of the socialists in the 1890s, the nation was polarised between the conservativeCatholic Party and the secularLiberal Party. The Liberals were anticlerical and wanted to reduce the power of the Church. The conflict came to a head during the "First School War" of 1879–1884 as Liberal attempts to introduce a greater level of secularism in primary education were beaten back by outraged Catholics. The School War ushered in a period of Catholic Party dominance in Belgian politics that lasted (almost unbroken) until 1917.[62]
The majority of those in the north of the country spoke Dutch and otherLow Franconian languages while those in the south spokeLangues d'oïl such asFrench,Walloon andPicard. French became the official language of government after the separation from the Netherlands in 1830 and Belgian cultural life was especially dominated by the French influence,[63][64] reinforced by economic domination of the industrial south. Flemish was "reduced to the tongue of a second-class culture."[65] Parts of the Flemish population reacted against this. This was partly due to a sense of growing Flemish identity. Flemish victories, like theBattle of the Golden Spurs in 1302 were celebrated and a Flemish cultural movement, led by figures likeHendrik Conscience was born. About the same time a Walloon Movement emerged, led byJules Destrée and based on loyalty to the French language. Universal suffrage meant the Francophones were a political minority, so the Walloon Movement concentrated on protecting French where it had a majority, and did not contest the expanded use of Dutch in Flemish areas.[66]
The Flemish goal of linguistic equality (especially in schools and courts) was finally achieved by a series of laws in the 1920s and 1930s. Dutch became the language of government, education, and the courts in the northern provinces of East and West Flanders, Antwerp, Limburg, and eastern Brabant. French remained the official language in Wallonia; Brussels, which had seen a majorlanguage shift to French, became an officially bilingual region. Meanwhile, a small separatist Flemish movement had emerged; the Germans had supported it during the war, and in the 1930s it turned fascist. In the Second World War it collaborated with the Nazis.[67]
Belgium was not a belligerent in theFranco-Prussian War 1870–71, but the proximity of the war led to the mobilisation of the army.[69] After the conflict, there was talk of modernising the military. The system ofRemplacement (whereby wealthy Belgians conscripted into the military could pay for a "replacement") was abolished and an improved system of conscription implemented. These reforms, led byd'Anethan under pressure fromLeopold II, divided Belgian politics. The Catholics united with the Liberals underFrère-Orban to oppose them, and the reforms were finally defeated whend'Anethan's government fell during an unrelated scandal.[70] Eventually, the military was reformed. The 1909 System instituted compulsory military service of eight years on active duty and five years in the reserves. This swelled the size of the Belgian army to over 100,000 well-trained men.[52] Construction of a chain of forts along the border was intensified, and let to a series of very modern fortifications, including the so-called "National redoubt" atAntwerp, at the fortified positions ofLiège andNamur, many of them designed by the Belgian fortress architect,Henri Alexis Brialmont.
The economy was stagnant during the long depression of 1873–1895, as prices and wages fell and labour unrest grew.[71] TheBelgian Workers' Party was founded in 1885 in Brussels. It issued theCharter of Quaregnon in 1894 calling for an end to capitalism and a thorough reorganization of society. During the late 19th century,general strikes became an established aspect of the political process. Between 1892 and 1961, there were 20 major strikes, including 7 general strikes. Many of these had overtly political motives, like the1893 General Strike that helped achieve universal suffrage.
On several occasions, Belgian general strikes escalated into violence. In 1893, soldiers fired on the striking crowd, killing several.Karl Marx wrote, "There exists but one country in the civilised world where every strike is eagerly and joyously turned into a pretext for the official massacre of the Working Class. That country of single blessedness is Belgium!"[72]
Nevertheless, Belgium created a welfare net particularly early, thanks in part to the trade unions. Sickness compensation was established in 1894, voluntary old-age insurance in 1900 and unemployment insurance in 1907, achieving good coverage nationwide much more quickly than its neighbours.[73]
Various reforms were introduced under the Catholic governments that led Belgium from the late nineteenth century onwards. In 1887, the system of paying workers in kind and in pubs was outlawed, and joint industrial and labour councils were established. In 1889, labour law councils were reformed, "with employers facing increasing working class representation." That same year, legislation on social housing and women's and child labour was reformed. In 1900, the first law on old-age pensions was approved, while a 1903 law on industrial accidents "stipulated it was no longer up to the worker to prove his innocence." From 1900 onwards, Catholic governments began subsidising unemployment funds, health services and savings banks. Mandatory Sunday rest was approved in 1905, while other reforms were carried out such as reduced working hours for miners, the outlawing of night work for women, and pensions for the military and civil service.[74] Under a law that came into effect in 1892, the employment of women and children under the age of 21 was prohibited.[75] In 1890, a fund of providence and relief for victims of industrial accidents was introduced by law.[76] In 1894, state subsidies were established for sickness funds.[77]
Following the elections of 1894 and 1896, according to one study, "The Catholics continued steadily carrying out their programme of social reforms, and various Acts were passed for the welfare of the working-classes-old-age pensions, workmen's dwellings, employers liability, subsidies to savings banks and mutual societies for the encouragement of thrift."[78] An 1896 law made workshop regulations compulsory for all companies employing at least 10 workers (which changed to 5 workers in 1900),[79] while other social policy measures included employers' industrial accident funds in 1903 and small state subsidies to voluntary unemployment funds in 1907.[80] In 1914, compulsory education was introduced for children between 6 and 14.[81] A National Crisis Fund as set up at the end of 1920 which, according to one study, "marked an important step towards general compensation forinvoluntary unemployment."[82] Healthcare subsidising by the national government was expanded, as characterised by disability funds in 1912, general medical care (expenses for general practitioner and pharmacist) in 1920, an anti-tuberculosis fund in 1921, basic treatment in 1927, expansion from general to particular medical care (surgery, hospitalisation, preventive medicine); cancer in 1931, and insurance for women and families (marriage premium and premium for death of spouse); death benefits in 1936.[83] In 1919 a scheme for the war-injured was introduced and for the victims of occupational diseases in 1927. From 1928 onwards, means-tested allowances were provided to physically disabled persons.[84] In August 1930, a law was passed making family allowances compulsory in private industry.[85] In 1921, an Act was passed providing for an 8-hour day and 48-hour working week, and in 1936 annual paid holidays were introduced in most industries.[86]
In 1893, the government rejected a proposal for universal male suffrage. Outraged, theBelgian Labour Party called a General Strike; by April 17, there were more than 50,000 strikers. Violent confrontations broke out with theGarde Civique (theCivil Guard or militia) around the country. The government soon backed down, and passed male universal suffrage but reduced its impact by creatingplural votes based on wealth, education and age. The Catholic conservatives, with 68% of the seats, remained in power.[87]
Again, in1902 and1913, there were general strikes aimed at forcing electoral reform and ending the system of plural voting. After the 1913 strike, a commission was created and was expected to remove plural voting, but implementation was delayed by the 1914 German invasion. In 1918, King Albert forged a post-war "Government of National Union" and brought about one man, one vote universal male suffrage. The last restrictions on women's voting were lifted in 1948.[88]
Artistic and literary culture in Belgium began a revival towards the late 19th century. A core element of Belgian nationalism was the scientific study of its national history. The movement was led by Godefroid Kurth, a student of the German historianRanke. Kurth taught modern historical methods to his students at theUniversity of Liège. The most prominent Belgian historian wasHenri Pirenne, who was influenced by this method during his period as a student of Kurth.[89]
At the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, monumentalHistoricism andNeoclassicism dominated the urban Belgian landscape, particularly in government buildings. Championed in part by KingLeopold II, the style can be seen in thePalais de Justice (designed byJoseph Poelaert) and theCinquantenaire.
Nevertheless, Brussels became one of the major European cities for the development of theArt Nouveau style in the late 1890s. The architectsVictor Horta,Paul Hankar, andHenry van de Velde became particularly famous for their designs, many of which survive today in Brussels. Four buildings designed by Horta are listed byUNESCO World Heritage Sites. Horta's largest work, theMaison du Peuple was demolished in 1960.
Stanard rejects the widely held notion that Belgians were "reluctant imperialists". He argues that "ordinary people came to understand and support the colony. Belgians not only sustained the empire in significant ways, but many became convinced imperialists, evidenced by the widespread, enduring and eagerly embraced propaganda in favor of the Congo."[90]
KingLeopold II of Belgium had been the principal shareholder in the Belgian trading company which established trading stations on the lower Congo between 1879 and 1884.[91] At theBerlin Conference of 1884–1885 the futureCongo was personally assigned to Leopold, who named the territory theCongo Free State. It was originally intended to be an internationalFree Trade zone, open to all European traders.[92] The area included in this territory was just under 1 million square miles,[93] almost 80 times the size of Belgium.[94][95][96] The first infrastructure projects took place during the Free State period, such as a railway that ran from theLéopoldville to the coast which took several years to complete.
The era of theCongo Free State is most infamous for the large number of atrocities committed under it. Since it was, in effect, a business venture, run by a private company headed by Leopold himself, it aimed to gain as much money as possible from primary exports. Leopold's personal fortune was greatly increased through the proceeds of selling Congolese rubber, which had never previously been mass-produced in such quantities, to the growing market for tyres. Between 1885 and 1908, as many as eight million Congolese died of exploitation and disease while the birth rate dropped.[97] These are only rough estimates, as no figures are available for the period.[98]
To enforce the rubber quotas, theForce Publique (FP) was created. While the Force Publique was nominally a military force – it would later fight during both theFirst andSecond World Wars) – during the Congo Free State period its primary duties involved enforcing rubber quotas via imprisonment, rape, abduction, forced labor, orsummary executions. Severing of limbs was sometimes used.[99] A Belgian captain, Leon Rom, ornamented his flowerbeds with the heads of 21 natives.[100]
Following reports from missionaries, there was growing moral outrage, particularly in Britain and the United States. TheCongo Reform Association, led byEdmund Dene Morel, was particularly important in this campaign, and published numerous best-selling tracts and pamphlets (includingRed Rubber) which reached a vast public. King Leopold appointed and financed his own commission to put these accusations to rest, but it too confirmed the atrocities.[101]
The Belgian parliament long refused to take over the colony, which was considered a financial burden. In 1908, the Belgian parliament responded to the international pressure, annexing the Free State. After World War II, Belgium was criticized by theUnited Nations for making no progress on the political front. Despite propaganda campaigns within Belgium, few Belgians showed much interest in the colony. Also, the government limited the possibility of Congolese settling in Belgium.[102]
Political rights were not granted to the Africans until 1956 when the growing middle class (the so-calledÉvolué) received the franchise, and the economy remained relatively undeveloped despite the mineral wealth ofKatanga. At theRound Table Talks on independence, Belgium requested a process of gradual independence over four years,[103] but following aseries of riots in 1959, the decision was made to bring forward independence in matter of months. The chaos in which Belgium departed the Congo caused[103] the secession of richWestern-backed province Katanga and the prolonged civil war known as theCongo Crisis.
TheBelgian Tianjin Concession in China was established in 1902. There was little investment and no settlement. However it led to a contract to supply an electric light and trolley system. In 1906, Tianjin became the first city in China with a modern public transportation system. The supply of electricity and lighting and the trolley business were profitable ventures. All the rolling stock was supplied by Belgian industries and by 1914, the network also reached nearby Austrian, French, Italian, Japanese and Russian concessions.
The colony was administered in a similar way as by the former German administrators, continuing policies such as ethnic identity cards. In 1959, moves towards independence could be seen in the territory and agitation byPARMEHUTU, a Hutu political party, was evident. In 1960, theRwandan Revolution occurred and Belgium changed the appointments of chiefs and vice-chiefs to promote Hutus.
Ruanda-Urundi gained independence in 1962 and its two regions,Rwanda andBurundi, separated.
When World War I began, Germany invaded neutral Belgium and Luxembourg as part of theSchlieffen Plan, trying to take Paris quickly. The threat to France caused Britain to enter the war, using the 1839 agreement as justification. TheBelgian army is remembered for their stubborn resistance during the early days of the war, with the army – around a tenth the size of the Germany Army – holding up the German offensive for nearly a month, giving the French and British forces time to prepare for theMarne counteroffensive. The German invaders treated any resistance—such as sabotaging rail lines—as illegal and subversive, and shot the offenders and burned buildings in retaliation.
Belgium had a prosperous economy at the start of the war but after four years of occupation, it emerged in a poor state, although Belgium itself had suffered few deaths. The Germans had "brutally and efficiently stripped the country bare. Machinery, spare parts, whole factories including the roofs, had disappeared eastward. In 1919, 80 percent of its workforce was unemployed."[104]
Belgian soldiers fought delaying actions in 1914 during the initial invasion. They succeeded in throwing the elaborate German invasion plan off schedule and helped sabotage the Schlieffen Plan that Berlin had counted on for a quick victory over France. At theBattle of Liège, thetown's fortifications were able to hold off the invaders for over a week. The German "Race to the Sea" was held off by Belgian forces at theBattle of the Yser. KingAlbert I stayed in theYser as commander of the military to lead the army whileBroqueville's government withdrew to nearbyLe Havre in France.Belgian units continued to serve on the front until 1918.
Forces from theBelgian Congo played a major role in the African Campaign anda small unit of Belgian soldiers served on the Eastern Front.
The Germans governed the occupied areas of Belgium through aGeneral Governorate of Belgium, while a small area of the country remained unoccupied.
The whole country was ruled undermartial law.[105] On the advice of the government, civil servants remained in their posts for the duration.[105]
The German army executed between 5,500[105] and 6,500[106] French and Belgian civilians between August and November 1914, usually in near-random large-scale shootings ordered by junior German officers. Individuals suspected of partisan activities were summarily shot.[107] Several important Belgian figures, including politicianAdolphe Max and historianHenri Pirenne, were deported to Germany.
The German occupying authorities viewed the Flemish as an oppressed people and had taken several Flemish-friendly measures, known asFlamenpolitik. This included introducing Dutch as the language of instruction of all state-supported schools in Flanders in 1918.[108] This prompted a renewed Flemish movement in the years following the war. The FlemishFrontbeweging (Soldiers' Movement) was formed from Flemish soldiers in the Belgian army to campaign for greater use of Dutch language in education and government, though not separatist.[109]
The Germans left Belgium stripped and barren. Over a 1.4 million refugees fled to France or to neutral Netherlands.[110] After the systematic atrocities by the German army in the first few weeks of the war, German civil servants took control and were generally correct, albeit strict and severe. There was never a violent resistance movement, but there was a large-scale spontaneous passive resistance of refusal to work for the benefit of German victory. Belgium was heavily industrialized; while farms operated and small shops stayed open most large establishments shut down or drastically reduced their output. The faculty closed the universities; many publishers shut down their newspapers. In 1916 Germany shipped 120,000 men and boys to work in Germany; this set off a storm of protest from neutral countries and they were returned. Germany then stripped the factories of all useful machinery, and used the rest as scrap iron for its steel mills.[111]
Belgium faced a food crisis and an international response was organized by the American engineerHerbert Hoover.[112] It was unprecedented in world history. Hoover'sCommission for Relief in Belgium (CRB) had the permission of Germany and the Allies.[113] As chairman of the CRB, Hoover worked with the leader of the BelgianComité National de Secours et d'Alimentation (CNSA),Émile Francqui, to feed the entire nation for the duration of the war. The CRB imported millions of tons of foodstuffs for the CN to distribute, and watched over the CN to make sure the German army did not appropriate the food. The CRB became a veritable independent republic of relief, with its own flag, navy, factories, mills, and railroads. Private donations and government grants (78%) supplied an $11-million-a-month budget.[114]
At its peak, the American arm, theARA fed 10.5 million people daily. Britain grew reluctant to support the CRB, preferring instead to emphasize Germany's obligation to supply the relief;Winston Churchill led a military faction that considered the Belgian relief effort "a positive military disaster".[115]
KingAlbert returned as a war hero. In contrast, the government and the exiles came back discreetly. Belgium had been devastated—not so much by combat, but rather by German seizure of valuable machinery. Only 81 operable locomotives remained, out of the 3,470 available in 1914. 46 of 51 steel mills were damaged, with 26 destroyed totally. More than 100,000 houses had been destroyed, as well as more than 120,000 hectares (300,000 acres) of farmland.[116]
Waves of popular violence accompanied liberation in November and December 1918 and the government responded through the judicial punishment of collaboration with the enemy conducted between 1919 and 1921. Shop windows were broken and houses sacked, men were harassed, and women's heads were shaved. Journalists who had boycotted and stopped writing called for harsh treatment of the newspapers that submitted to German censorship. Many people stigmatized profiteers and demanded justice. Thus in 1918, Belgium was already confronted with the problems associated with occupation that most European countries only discovered at the end of World War II.[117]
However, despite the status quo, Belgium recovered surprisingly quickly. Thefirst postwar Olympic Games were held in Antwerp in 1920. In 1921,Luxembourg formed a customs union with Belgium.
German reparations to Belgium for damage incurred during theFirst World War was set at £12.5 billionpounds sterling.In 1919 under theTreaty of Versailles the area ofEupen-Malmedy, along withMoresnet was transferred to Belgium. "Neutral Moresnet" was transferred to Belgium, as well as theVennbahn railway. An opportunity was given to the population to "oppose" against the transfer by signing a petition, which gathered few signatures, in large part thanks to intimidation by local authorities, and all regions remain part of Belgium today.
Belgian requests to annex territory considered as historically theirs from the Dutch, who were perceived as collaborators, was denied.[105]
Between January 1923 and August 1925, Belgian and French soldiers were sent to theRuhr inGermany to force the German government to agree to continue reparation payments. TheOccupation of the Ruhr led to theDawes Plan which allowed the German government more leniency in paying reparations.
The League of Nations in 1925 made Belgium the trustee for the formerGerman East Africa which bordered the Belgian Congo to the east. It becameRwanda-Urundi (or "Ruanda-Urundi") (modern dayRwanda andBurundi).[118] Although promising the League it would promote education, Belgium left the task to subsidised Catholic missions and unsubsidised Protestant missions. As late as 1962, fewer than 100 natives had gone beyond secondary school. The policy was one of low-cost paternalism, as explained by Belgium's special representative to the Trusteeship Council: "The real work is to change the African in his essence, to transform his soul, [and] to do that one must love him and enjoy having daily contact with him. He must be cured of his thoughtlessness, he must accustom himself to living in society, he must overcome his inertia."[119]
Comic strips became extremely popular in Belgium during the 1930s. One of the most popular comics of the 20th century,Hergé'sThe Adventures of Tintin first appeared in 1929.
Belgian comics are a distinct subgroup in the comics history, and played a major role in the development ofEuropean comics, alongside France with whom they share a long common history. While the comics in the two major language groups and regions of Belgium (Flanders with the Dutch language and Wallonia with French) each have clearly distinct characteristics, they are constantly influencing one another, and meeting each other in Brussels and in the bilingual publication tradition of the major editors. As one of the few arts where Belgium has had an international and enduring impact in the 20th century, comics are known to be "an integral part of Belgian culture". Major contributors includeHergé withThe Adventures of Tintin,Dupuis withSpirou,Willy Vandersteen withSuske en Wiske,Bessy,De Rode Ridder,Robert en Bertrand and many others,Marc Sleen withThe Adventures of Nero,Peyo withThe Smurfs,Jef Nys withJommeke, and so many more.
Sales of comic books make up 14% of all book sales in Belgium's northern region of Flanders.
Belgium has played a major role in the development of the 9th art. In fact, even the designation of comics as the 9th Art is due to a Belgian. Morris introduced the term in 1964 when he started a series about the history of comics in Spirou. Belgium's comic-strip culture has been called by Time magazine "Europe's richest", while the Calgary Sun calls Belgium "the home of the comic strip". Belgium has several museums dedicated to comic books, comic book heroes and their authors.
Belgium tried to pursue a policy of unaligned neutrality before the war, but on May 10, 1940, the country wasinvaded by German forces. In the initial attacks, the fortifications which had been constructed to protect the borders likeFort Eben-Emael and theK-W Line were captured or bypassed by German forces. On May 28, after 18 days of fighting, Belgian forces (including the commander in chief,King Leopold III)[120] surrendered. The elected government, underHubert Pierlot, escaped to form agovernment in exile.
After the defeat in 1940, significant numbers of Belgian soldiers and civilians managed to escape to Britain to join the Belgian army in Exile. Belgian soldiers formed the1st Belgian Infantry Brigade, which also included a battery of soldiers from Luxembourg, more often known as theBrigade Piron after its commanding officer,Jean-Baptiste Piron. The Brigade Piron was involved in theNormandy Invasion and the battles in France and the Netherlands until liberation. Belgians also served in British special forces units during the war, forming a troop ofNo.10 Commando which was heavily involved in theItalian Campaign andLandings on Walcheren. The5th Special Air Service (SAS) was entirely made up of Belgians.
Belgium was run by a Germany military government between its surrender and liberation in September 1944.
The former fort atBreendonk, nearMechelen was requisitioned by the Nazis and used for detainment and interrogation of Jews, political prisoners and captured members of the resistance. Of the 3,500 incarcerated in Breendonk between 1940 and 1944, 1,733 died.[123] About 300 people were killed in the camp itself, with at least 98 dying from deprivation or torture.[124][125]
In 1940, nearly 70,000 Jews were living in Belgium. Of these, 46 percent were deported from theMechelen transit camp, while a further 5,034 people were deported via theDrancy internment camp. From the summer of 1942 until 1944, twenty-eight transports left Belgium carrying 25,257 Jews and 351 Roma to eastern Europe, often toAuschwitz. A total of 25,257 Jews were transported (including 5,093 children) and 352 Roma over the Mechelen-Leuven railway to concentration camps. Only 1,205 returned home alive.
Resistance against the German occupiers can be seen at all levels, but was highly fragmented. Some organisations were very left-wing, like the CommunistFront de l'Indépendance, but there was also a far-right resistance movement, theLégion Belge which comprised dissidentRexists, and other groups likeGroupe G had no obvious political affiliation.
Resistance to the occupiers chiefly came in the form of helping allied airmen escape, and numerous lines were set up to organise this, for instance theComet line which evacuated an estimated 14,000 allied airmen toGibraltar.[126] Sabotage was also used, andGroup G's activities alone are estimated to have cost the Nazis 20 million man-hours of labor to repair damages.[127] The resistance were also instrumental in saving Jews and Roma from deportation, for instance the attack on theTwentieth convoy. There was also significant low-level resistance, for instance in June 1941, theCity Council of Brussels refused to distributeStars of David badges.[128] Many Belgians also hid Jews and political dissidents during the occupation, with one estimate putting the number at 20,000.[c]
During Nazi occupation, some Belgians collaborated with their occupiers. There were pro-Nazi political organizations in both Flemish and Walloon communities before and during the war. The most significant were the FlemishDeVlag andVlaamsch Nationaal Verbond (VNV) as well as the Catholic WalloonRexist movement. These organisations were also fundamental to encouraging Belgians to enlist in the German army. Two divisions of theWaffen SS, the Flemish27th SS "Langemarck" Division and the Walloon28th SS "Wallonien" Division. Some organisations, likeVerdinaso appealed directly to Flemish separatist ideologies, though they did not become very popular.
After the war, many of those who had collaborated – including many of the guards atFort Breendonk – were tried, imprisoned or shot.
Belgium was liberated late in 1944 by Allied forces. On 3 September 1944 the Welsh Guards liberated Brussels. TheBritish Second Army seizedAntwerp on 4 of September 1944, and theFirst Canadian Army began conducting combat operations around the port that same month. Antwerp became a highly prized and heavily fought-over objective because its deep-water port was necessary to keep the Allied armies supplied. TheBattle of the Scheldt in October 1944 was fought primarily on Dutch soil, but with the objective of opening the way for boats to Antwerp. The port city was also the ultimate objective of German armies during theArdennes Offensive which resulted in heavy fighting on Belgian soil during the winter of 1944–1945.
Following liberation, 10,000 Belgians who had remained in the country during the occupation were mobilised into the Belgian army in 57 "Fusilier Battalions".
Immediately after the war,Léopold III, who had surrendered to the German army in 1940, was released; however, the issue of whether he hadbetrayed his country by surrendering, while most government ministers had escaped to the United Kingdom, presented a constitutional dilemma. The Belgian public was concerned that he might be a collaborator with the Nazis. He had metHitler inBerchtesgaden on November 19, 1940, and had even remarried (toLilian Baels) during the war. Many Belgians, especially the Socialists, strongly opposed his return to power. He was kept in exile in Switzerland until 1950, while his brotherPrince Charles presided as regent.
A 1950 referendum produced a very close result. InFlanders, the electorate voted 70% in favour of his return butWallonia voted 58% against. Brussels also returned a 51% "No" vote. Although the referendum narrowly produced a favourable result for Léopold (about 57.68% in the country as a whole), the militant socialist movement in Liège, Hainaut and other urban centres incited major protests and even called aGeneral Strike against his return. Léopold III abdicated on July 16, 1951, in favour of his sonBaudouin.
TheTreaty of Brussels, signed on 17 March 1948 by Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, France, and the United Kingdom, is considered the precursor to theNATO agreement, which Belgium became an official member of on April 4, 1949. The headquarters of NATO are located inBrussels, and the headquarters ofSHAPE nearMons.
The AmericanMarshall Plan gave Belgium $559 million in grants from 1948 to 1951. A central goal of the ERP was to promote the growth of productivity along the lines of American management and labor practices. The interest among some Belgian employers in increasing rates of productivity per worker was motivated by the rise in wage levels. But the Americans also intended to inject a new "spirit of productivity" in Belgian industries, which implied, among other measures, a reinforcement of structures of corporatist negotiation. After the belated establishment of the Belgian Office for the Increase of Productivity in 1952, the political character of the program became apparent. The "policy of productivity" was successful for a time because it matched the evolution of social reforms. This policy success, however, was rendered impotent by the failure of the economic dimension of the productivity campaigns. The Americans had in effect failed to recognize the structural importance of the major financial groups which dominated heavy industry in Belgium. By not carrying out any large-scale programs of innovation and investment in the key sectors that they controlled in the aftermath of the war, these holding companies greatly restricted the scope for American influence. Consequently, it was by other means, such as the training of managers, that American paradigms entered Belgian economic culture.[134]
After the war, the government cancelled Belgium's debts. It was during this period that the well-known Belgian highways were built. In addition, both the economy and the average standard of living rose significantly. As noted byRobert Gildea, "Social and economic policy was designed to restore liberal capitalism tempered by social reform, as prepared for during the war. Trade unions were also involved in a price and wage policy to cut inflation and this, together with the Allied use of Antwerp as the main entry point for war supplies, produced the so-called Belgian miracle of high economic growth combined with high wages."[135] According to one study, Belgian workers by 1961 earned wages "second only to those of the French in the Common Market area", and earned 40% more than their Dutch counterparts.[136]
Despite postwar affluence, however, many Belgians continued to live in poverty. An organisation of several poverty action groups, known as the National Action for Security of Subsistence, claimed that more than 900,000 Belgians (about 10% of the population) lived in poverty in 1967, while in the early 1970s, a group of social scientists called the Working Group on Alternative Economics estimated that about 14.5% of the Belgian population lived in poverty.[137]
Because Flanders had been widely devastated during the war and had been largely agricultural since the Belgian uprising, it benefited most from the Marshall Plan. Its standing as an economically backward agricultural region meant that it obtained support from Belgium's membership of theEuropean Union and its predecessors. At the same time, Wallonia experienced a slow relative decline as the products of its mines and mills came to be less in demand. The economic balance between the two parts of the country has remained less in favour of Wallonia than it was before 1939.
After victory in the 1950 elections, aChristian Social Party (PSC-CVP) government came to power. The new education minister,Pierre Harmel, increased the wages of teachers in private (Catholic) schools and introduced laws linking the subsidies for private schools to the number of pupils. These measures were perceived by the anti-clericalLiberals andSocialists as a "declaration of war".
When the 1954 elections brought to power a coalition ofSocialists andLiberals, the new Education Minister,Leo Collard, immediately set out to reverse the measures taken by his predecessor, founding a large number of secular schools and only permitting teachers with a diploma, forcing many priests out of the profession. These measures sparked mass protests from the Catholic bloc. A compromise was eventually found by the next government (a Catholic minority led byGaston Eyskens), and the"Schools War" was concluded by the November 6, 1958 "School Pact".[138]
After riots in the Congo in 1959, the scheduled gradual transition to independence was sped up dramatically. In June 1960, theBelgian Congo was replaced by the short-livedFirst Republic of Congo, led by the democratically elected Congolese statesmanPatrice Lumumba. Belgian forces withdrew, leaving the militaryForce Publique under Congo's control. Order broke down as mutinying soldiers attacked whites who remained in the country. Belgians forces were briefly sent to evacuate Belgian nationals and army officers.
In July 1960, the southern state ofKatanga Province declared its independence, forming theState of Katanga. Katanga's bid for sovereignty was supported by Belgian mining companies and soldiers, who had considerable assets in the area. Later that month,United Nations peacekeepers were deployed to the country. During this period of anarchy, the region ofSouth Kasai also declared independence. Western powers including Belgium supportedJoseph Mobutu, who installed a right-wing regime in the Congo. Lumumba was murdered and civil war ensued. Belgian paratroopers were again deployed, this time to rescue civilian hostages captured inStanleyville during an operation known asDragon Rouge. At the end Mobutu emerged as the ruler of the re-unified country, which he namedZaire.
In December 1960, Wallonia was gripped by a general strike in response to the general decline of Wallonian manufacturing in a period of turbulence in the aftermath of theSecond Schools War. The Wallonian workers demanded federalism, in addition to structural reforms. Even though the strike had been intended to be nationwide, Flemish workers appeared reluctant to support it.
TheStrike was led byAndré Renard, the founder of "Renardism" which combined militant socialism with Walloon nationalism. The historian Renée Fox described Wallonia's alienation:
At the beginning of the 1960s (...), a major reversal in the relationship between Flanders and Wallonia was taking place. Flanders had entered a vigorous, post–World War II period of industrialization, and a significant percentage of the foreign capital (particularly from the United States, coming into Belgium to support new industries, was being invested in Flanders. In contrast, Wallonia's coal mines and time-worn steel plants and factories were in crisis. The region had lost thousands of jobs and much investment capital. A new Dutch-speaking, upwardly mobile "populist bourgeoisie" was not only becoming visible and vocal in Flemish movements but also in both the local and national policy... [The strike of December 1960 against the austerity law ofGaston Eyskens ] was replaced by a collective expression of the frustrations, anxieties, and grievances that Wallonia was experiencing in response to its altered situation, and by the demands of the newly formedWalloon Popular Movement for...regional autonomy for Wallonia...[139]
Nationwide the economy was generally healthy with an annual growth rate of 5% in the 1960s. However old inefficient factories were being shut down in textiles and leather goods. Coal miners were angered by the closure of used-up mines. Limburg miners at the Zwartberg mine rioted in 1966 to protest its closure. Two miners were killed by police and ten were injured, while nineteen policemen were hurt.[140] In 1973 a series of worldwide crises adversely affected the Belgian economy.
This Flemish resurgence has been accompanied by a corresponding shift of political power to the Flemish, who constituted the majority of the population of around 60%. An official Dutch translation of theconstitution was only accepted in 1967.[141]
The successive linguistic disputes made the successive Belgian governments very unstable. The three major parties all split in two according to their French- or Dutch-speaking electorate. A language border was determined by the first Gilson Act of November 8, 1962. The boundaries of certainprovinces,arrondissements andmunicipalities were modified andfacilities for linguistic minorities were introduced in 25 municipalities. On August 2, 1963, the second Gilson Act entered into force, fixing the division of Belgium into four language areas: a Dutch, a French and a German language area, withBrussels as a bilingual area.
In 1970, there was a first state reform, which resulted in the establishment of three cultural communities: Dutch, French and German. This reform was a response to theFlemish demand for cultural autonomy. The constitutional revision of 1970 also laid the foundations for the establishment of threeRegions, which was a response to the demand of theWalloons and the French-speaking inhabitants ofBrussels for economic autonomy. On February 18, 1970,Prime MinisterGaston Eyskens announced the end of "La Belgique de papa".
The second state reform took place in 1980, when the cultural communities becameCommunities. The Communities assumed the competencies of the cultural communities with regard to cultural matters, and became responsible for the 'matters relating to the person', such as health and youth policy. From then on, these three Communities were known as theFlemish Community, theFrench Community and theGerman-speaking Community. Two Regions were established as well in 1980: theFlemish Region and theWalloon Region. However, in Flanders it was decided in 1980 to immediately merge the institutions of the Community and the Region. Although the creation of a Brussels Region was provided for in 1970, theBrussels-Capital Region was not established until the third state reform.
During the third state reform in 1988 and 1989, underPrime MinisterWilfried Martens, theBrussels-Capital Region was established with its own regional institutions, as well asDutch andFrench institutions for community matters. The Brussels-Capital Region remained limited to 19 municipalities. Other changes included that the competencies of the Communities and Regions were expanded. One notable responsibility that was transferred to the Communities during the third state reform was education.
The fourth state reform, which took place in 1993 under Prime MinisterJean-Luc Dehaene, consolidated the previous state reforms and turned Belgium into a fully-fledged federal state. The first article of theBelgian Constitution was amended to read, "Belgium is a Federal State which consists of Communities and Regions". During the fourth state reform, the responsibilities of the Communities and the Regions were expanded, their resources were increased and they were given more fiscal responsibilities. Other major changes included the direct election of the parliaments of the Communities and the Regions, the splitting up of theProvince of Brabant intoFlemish Brabant andWalloon Brabant, and the reformation of theFederal Parliament'sbicameral system and the relations between the Federal Parliament and theFederal Government. The first direct elections for the parliaments of the Communities and the Regions took place on May 21, 1995.
In 2001, a fifth state reform took place,[142] under Prime MinisterGuy Verhofstadt, with the Lambermont and the Lombard Accords. More powers were transferred to the Communities and the Regions, with regard to agriculture, fisheries, foreign trade, development cooperation, auditing of electoral expenses and the supplementary financing of the political parties. The Regions became responsible for twelve regional taxes, and local and provincial government became a matter for the Regions. The first municipal and provincial elections under the supervision of the Regions werein 2006. The functioning of the Brussels institutions was also amended during the fifth state reform, which resulted among other things in a guaranteed representation of the Flemish inhabitants in theParliament of the Brussels-Capital Region.
At the end of 2011, following the longest political crisis in Belgium's contemporary history, a constitutional accord between the four main political families (socialists, liberals, social-Christians, ecologists), but excluding the Flemish nationalists, ushered in thesixth state reform which provided for major institutional changes and additional transfers of competences from the federal level to the Communities and the Regions. Among other changes, the Senate ceased to be directly elected to become an assembly of regional parliaments, the Brussels-Capital Region was granted constitutive autonomy, and the Regions received economic, employment and family welfare competences as well as greater fiscal autonomy.[143]
Belgium was one of the founders of the EuropeanCommon Market. Between 1999 and 2002, theEuro gradually replaced theBelgian franc (the currency of Belgium since 1830) at the rate of 1 EUR=40.3399 BEF[144] Belgian Euro coins usually depictKing Albert II on the obverse.
From the 1960s, most political parties, which had previously stood in elections in both Flemish and Walloon areas, split down linguistic divides. TheCatholic party split in 1968 while theBelgian Socialist Party split in 1978 into the French-speakingParti Socialiste and FlemishSocialistische Partij.[145] TheLiberals also split on regional lines in 1992.
"Green" politics in Belgium became quite successful in the aftermath of theMarc Dutroux Scandal and the "Dioxin Affair".
In 1996, confidence in the political and criminal justice systems was shaken by the news thatMarc Dutroux and his accomplices had kidnapped, tortured, and murdered young girls. Parliamentary inquiries found the police forces were incompetent and bureaucratic, and the judicial system suffered from bureaucracy, very poor communication with, and support for, the victims, slow procedures and many loopholes for criminals. On October 26, 1996, about 300,000 Belgians joined the "White March" in Brussels in protest.[146]
After thedowning of the Rwandan and Burundian presidential plane 10 Belgian peacekeepers were murdered by the Hutu-dominated government army. In response, Belgium withdrew all of its peacekeepers, blaming UNAMIR for failing to rescue their men.[147] The Belgians had represented the largest and most capable element in the UNAMIR mission, leaving it incapacitated and unable to cope with the events of theRwandan genocide.
Belgian paratroopers were deployed toSomalia duringOperation Restore Hope as part ofUNOSOM tasked with securing aid deliveries and peacekeeping. Several Belgian soldiers were killed during the deployment.
During theKosovo crisis of 1999, 600 Belgianparatroopers participated in Operation Allied Harbour, aNATO operation to protect and provide assistance to the huge number of ethnic Albanianrefugees inAlbania andMacedonia. That same year, 1,100 Belgian soldiers participated in theKosovo Force (KFOR), a NATO-ledpeacekeeping force.
Belgium was part of theISAF mission in Afghanistan, joint with soldiers from Luxembourg. The main objective was providing security atKabul International Airport, while detachments assisted in the northern PRTs ofKunduz andMazar-i-Sharif. In September 2008, fourF‑16 jets with about 140 support personnel were deployed.[151]
Belgium created huge debts during times when rates were low and generated new debts to service the initial debt. Its debts amounted to about 130% of theGDP in 1992 and were decreased to about 108,2% in 2001.[152] This drastic economic policy resulted in deep budget spending cuts, such as cuts to scientific research.[citation needed]
In July 1999, a government ofGreens andFlemish Liberals and Democrats announced a gradual phase-out ofBelgium's seven nuclear reactors after 40 years of operation. Though it was speculated that the next government without Greens would immediately revoke this legislation.[153] after the 2003 elections there was still no sign of a policy reversal,[154] particularly in the aftermath of the incident atTihange reactor in 2002.[155]
The2010 Belgian federal election produced a highly fragmented political landscape, with 11 parties elected to theChamber of Representatives, none of which had more than 20% of the seats. The separatistNew Flemish Alliance (N-VA), the largest party inFlanders and the country as a whole, controlled 27 of 150 seats in the lower chamber. Belgium beat the world record for time taken to form a new democratic government after an election, at 353 days.[157] Finally a government coalition was sworn in on 6 December 2011, with SocialistElio Di Rupo becoming prime minister.[158]
Charles Michel, the Prime Minister of Belgium from 2014 until 2019
The2014 election resulted in a further electoral gain for the Flemish nationalist N-VA, although the incumbent coalition maintained a solid majority. On 22 July 2014, King Philippe nominatedCharles Michel (MR) andKris Peeters (CD&V) to lead the formation of a new coalition federal cabinet.[159]
Modernhistoriography of Belgium began to appear in the later 18th century, as scholars moved beyond the chronicles of particular provinces, cities or leaders and relied on rapidly accumulating data. They wrote dissertations using the critical approach to particular historical problems. This development was sponsored byThe Royal Academies for Science and the Arts of Belgium and reflected Enlightenment influences in exploring the history of the people. Their goal was building the blocks for a general history of the Austrian Netherlands, thus marking an important step toward the creation of a Belgian national history.[164]
Since Belgium became an independent nation only in 1830, defining nationhood was a special issue for the historians of the late 19th century. The usual European solutions which defined nationhood in terms of language would not work. The challenge of defining the nation's past and present in the face of Dutch, Spanish, Austrian, French, and German influences posed a central problem. Defending the boundaries of Belgium (especially why Flanders should not be in the Netherlands) was another issue that preoccupied historical writers such as Pirenne.[165]
Belgian historiography achieved international stature in the early 20th century with the work of medievalistHenri Pirenne.[166] After 1945Charles Verlinden introduced the methods of the FrenchAnnales School of social history. Research topics at Ghent included colonial and maritime history, the history of prices and wages, agrarian history, business history, and the textile industry. In the 1970 and 1980s came a broadening to such topics as historical demography; living standards and lifestyles; beggary and crime; and the history of culture.[167]
^"Primrose, Archibald Philip, fifth earl of Rosebery and first earl of Midlothian".Oxford dictionary of phrase and fable (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. 2005.ISBN978-0-1986-0981-0. Retrieved21 March 2021.cockpit of Europe a name for Belgium, as a part of Europe on which European conflicts have frequently been fought; the idea is first recorded in the writings of the Anglo-Welsh man of letters James Howell (c. 1594–1666)
^Caesar,Gallic War,8.46 (In online English translations, this sentence is often included in the next paragraph,8.47).
^González Villaescusa; Jacquemin (2011), "Gallia Belgica: An Entity with No National Claim",Études rurales, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 93–111,doi:10.4000/etudesrurales.9499
^Wightman, Edith (1985),Gallia Belgica, University of California Press, p. 12,ISBN978-0-5200-5297-0
^abcVanmontfort (2007), "Bridging the gap. The Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in a frontier zone",Documenta Praehistorica, vol. 34, pp. 105–118,doi:10.4312/dp.34.8
^Constantin; Ilett; Burnez-Lanotte (2011), "La Hoguette, Limburg, and the Mesolithic", in Vanmontfort; Kooijmans; Amkreutz (eds.),Pots, Farmers and Foragers: How Pottery Traditions Shed a Light on Social Interaction in the Earliest Neolithic of the Lower Rhine Area, Amsterdam University Press
^Ott, Mack (2012).The Political Economy of Nation Building: The World's Unfinished Business. Transaction Publishers. p. 92.ISBN978-1-4128-4742-1.
^Van der Wee, Herman (1963).The Growth of the Antwerp Market and the European Economy: Interpretation. Nijhoff. p. 127.OL10679393W.
^Tracy, James Donald (1993).The Rise of Merchant Empires: Long-Distance Trade in the Early Modern World, 1350–1750. Cambridge University Press. p. 263.ISBN978-0-5214-5735-4.OL2206050M.
^Sugg, Richard (2012).Mummies, Cannibals and Vampires: the History of Corpse Medicine from the Renaissance to the Victorians. Taylor & Francis. p. 198.ISBN978-1-1365-7736-9.
^Sharp Hume, Martín Andrew.The Spanish People: Their Origin, Growth and Influence. p. 372.
^Gillespie, Alexander (2017).The Causes of War: Volume III: 1400 CE to 1650 CE. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 131.
^Bart de Groof, "Alexander Farnese and the Origins of Modern Belgium",Bulletin de l'Institut Historique Belge de Rome (1993) Vol. 63, pp. 195–219.
^abcdViolet Soen, "Reconquista and Reconciliation in the Dutch Revolt: The Campaign of Governor-General Alexander Farnese (1578–1592)",Journal of Early Modern History (2012) 16#1 pp. 1–22.
^Black, Jeremy (1996).The Cambridge Illustrated Atlas of Warfare: Renaissance to Revolution, 1492–1792. Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press. p. 58.ISBN978-0-5214-7033-9.
^Geert H. Janssen, "The Counter-Reformation of the Refugee: Exile and the Shaping of Catholic Militancy in the Dutch Revolt",Journal of Ecclesiastical History (2012) 63#4 pp. 671–692
^Nolan, Cathal J. (2008).Wars of the Age of Louis XIV, 1650–1715: An Encyclopedia of Global Warfare and Civilization. Bloomsbury Academic. p. 444.ISBN978-0-3133-3046-9.
^"Belgium".Encyclopedia Britannica. Britannica Online Encyclopedia. Retrieved3 November 2012.
^Jacques Godechot, "The Business Classes and the Revolution Outside France",American Historical Review (1958) 64#1 p. 7in JSTOR
^Janet L. Polasky, and Michael J. Sydenham, "The French Revolution: A Belgian Perspective",Consortium on Revolutionary Europe 1750–1850: Proceedings (1986), Vol. 16, pp. 203–212
^Witte, Els, "La Construction de la Belgique 1828–1847", in E. Witte, É. Gubin and J.P. Nandrin, G. Deneckere,Nouvelle Histoire de Belgique, vol. I: 1830–1905, p. 73.
^abBond, Brian (1984).War and society in Europe, 1870–1970. London: Fontana Paperbacks. p. 70.ISBN978-0-0063-5547-2.
^Schama, Simon (1972). "The Rights of Ignorance: Dutch Educational Policy in Belgium 1815–30".History of Education.1 (1):81–89.doi:10.1080/0046760720010106.
^Baten, Jörg (2016).A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present. Cambridge University Press. p. 20.ISBN978-1-1075-0718-0.
^Evans, Chris; Rydén, Göran (2005).The Industrial Revolution in Iron; The impact of British Coal Technology in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Ashgate. pp. 37–38.
^Neven, Muriel; Devos, Isabelle (2001). Neven, M.; Devos, I. (eds.). "Recent work in Belgian Historical Demography / Revue Belge d'Histoire Contemporaine / Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Nieuwste Geschiedenis".Journal of Economic History.31 (3–4):347–359.
^Strikwerda, Carl (1997).A house divided: Catholics, Socialists, and Flemish nationalists in nineteenth-century Belgium. pp. 44–46.
^Pounds, Norman; Parker, William (1957).Coal and steel in Western Europe. ch. 5.
^O'Brien, Patrick (1983).Railways and the economic development of Western Europe, 1830–1914. ch. 7.
^Rondo E. Cameron,France and the economic development of Europe, 1800–1914 (2000) p. 343
^Louis Vos, "Nationalism, Democracy and the Belgian State" in Richard Caplan and John Feffer,Europe's New Nationalism: States and Minorities in Conflict (Oxford, 1966) pp.89–90
^Marx and Engels on the Trade Unions. Edited with an introduction and notes, by Kenneth Lapides, Originally published, Praeger, New York, 1987, p. 69ISBN0-7178-0676-6
^Peter Flora &, Arnold J. Heidenheimer (1995).The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. Transaction. p. 51.
^The Encyclopedia of Social Reform Including Political Economy, Political Science, Sociology and Statistics Edited by William D. P. Bliss with the co-operation of many specialists, 1897, P.236
^Experiencing Wages Social and Cultural Aspects of Wage Forms in Europe Since 1500, 2003, Editors: Peter Scholliers, L. D. Schwarz, P.88
^Trade Unions in Western Europe Since 1945 By J. Visser, Bernard Ebbinghaus, 2017, P.114
^The Performance of Social Systems Perspectives and Problems, 2012, edited by Francisco Parra-Luna, P.249
^De Christelijke arbeidersbeweging in België Part 2, by Emmanuel Gerard, 1991, P.195
^Two Centuries of Solidarity German, Belgian, and Dutch Social Health Care Insurance 1770-2008 By Karel-Peter Companje, 2009, P.151
^Employment Policies for Disabled People in Eighteen Countries A Review By Patricia Thornton, Neil Lunt, International Labour Office, University of York. Social Policy Research Unit, Commission of the European Communities, 1997, P.37
^Monthly Labor Review, August 1943, Vol. 57, No. 2, United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, P.268
^Meier, Petra."Report from Belgium". European Database – Women in Decision-making. Archived fromthe original on 12 January 2013. Retrieved3 November 2012.
^Le Goff, Jacques (1992).History and Memory. Translated by Rendall, Steven; Claman, Elizabeth. Columbia University Press. p. 198.ISBN978-0-2310-7591-6.OL1717341M.
^Asserate, Asfa-Wossen (2016).Die neue Völkerwanderung. Wer Europa bewahren will, muss Afrika retten (in German). Frankfurt am Main: Propyläen Verlag.ISBN978-3-5490-7478-7.
^Laurence VanYpersele, and Xavier Rousseaux,Leaving the War: Popular Violence and Judicial Repression of 'Unpatriotic' Behaviour in Belgium (1918–1921).European Review of History (2005) 12#1 pp. 3–22.
^William Roger Louis,Ruanda-Urundi 1884–1919 (Oxford University Press 1963).
^Duarte, Mary T. (1995). "Education in Ruanda-Urundi, 1946–61".Historian.57 (2):275–284.
^Chronicle of the 20th Century; editors: Derrik Mercer [et al.] London: Dorling KindersleyISBN0-7513-3006-X; pp. 529–531
^J. Lee Ready, Jefferson: McFarland,Forgotten Allies (Vol.1), (1985) pp.254
^Nigel ThomasForeign Volunteers of the Allied Forces: 1939–45 (Osprey, 1998) pp. 17
^N. C.,« Breendonk, Le Mémorial ne changera pas de nom », dansLe Soir, 6 décembre 2007, p. 5
^(in French) O. Van der Wilt (conservateur du Mémorial national du fort de Breendonk),Le projet pédagogique du Mémorial National du Fort de Breendonk, p. 1.
^Nichol, John; Rennell, Tony (2007).Home Run: Escape from Nazi Europe. Penguin. p. 470.
^Miller, Russell (1979).The Resistance: WWII. Time Life Education.
^"Belgium".Member Countries. European Union. Retrieved18 November 2012.
^Kenneth Bertrams, "Productivite Economique et Paix Sociale au sein du Plan Marshall: Les Limites de l'influence Americaine aupres des Industriels et Syndicats Belges, 1948–1960," [Economic Productivity and Social Peace Within the Marshall Plan: the Limits of American Influence on Belgian Industrialists and Trade Unionists, 1948–60].Cahiers D'histoire du Temps Présent 2001 (9): 191–235. ISSN 0771-6435
^Surviving Hitler and Mussolini: daily life in occupied Europe by Robert Gildea
^Victor George and Roger Lawson, eds.Poverty and Inequality in Common Market Countries (1980)
^Michel, ARIES .... Sous la dir. de Jacques (2005).La laïcité histoires nationales – perspectives européennes; [regards croisés sur la laïcité: droit, histoire, philosophie; actes du colloque de Valence; 12–13 septembre 2002]. Lyon: J.André.ISBN978-2-9150-0965-1.
^Renée C. Fox,In the Belgian Château, Ivan R.Dee, Chicago, page 13, 1994ISBN1-5666-3057-6
^Tom Verschaffel, "The modernization of historiography in 18th-century Belgium,"History of European Ideas (2005) 31#2 pp. 135–146
^Jo Tollebeek, "Historical representation and the nation-state in romantic Belgium (1830–1850),"Journal of the History of Ideas (1998) 59#2 pp. 329–353in JSTOR
^Jo Tollebeek, "At the crossroads of nationalism: Huizinga, Pirenne and the Low Countries in Europe,"European Review of History (2010) 17#2 pp. 187–215.
^Hugo Soly, "Honderd Jaar Geschiedenis van de Nieuwe Tijd Aan de Universiteit Gent: De Dynamiek van een Selectief En Kritisch Eclectisme," [One hundred years of modern history at the University of Ghent: the dynamics of a selective and critical eclecticism],Handelingen der Maatschappij voor Geschiedenis en Oudheidkunde te Gent (2006), Vol. 60, pp. 49–62.
Stallaerts, Robert.The A to Z of Belgium (2010), a historical encyclopedia
State, Paul F. (2004).Historical Dictionary of Brussels. Scarecrow Press.ISBN978-0-8108-6555-6.
Witte, Els; Craeybeckx, Jan; Meynen, Alain (2009).Political History of Belgium: From 1830 Onwards. ASP (Academic & Scientific Publishers) / Vubpress / Upa.ISBN978-9-0548-7517-8.
Ascherson, Neal (1999).The King incorporated: Leopold the Second and the Congo (New ed.). London: Granta.ISBN978-1-8620-7290-9.
Carlier, Julie. "Forgotten Transnational Connections and National Contexts: an 'entangled history' of the political transfers that shaped Belgian feminism, 1890–1914",Women's History Review (2010) 19#4 pp. 503–522.
Conway, Martin.The Sorrows of Belgium: Liberation and Political Reconstruction, 1944–1947 (Oxford University Press, 2012).online review
Cook, Bernard A. (2004).Belgium : a history. New York: Peter Lang.ISBN978-0-8204-5824-3.
Fishman, J. S.Diplomacy and Revolution. The London Conference of 1830 and the Belgian Revolt (Amsterdam 1988).
Lorwin, Val R. "Belgium: Religion, class and language in national politics", in Robert Dahl, ed.Political Oppositions in Western Democracies (1966) pp. 147–187.
Mansel, Philip. "Nation Building: the Foundation of Belgium."History Today 2006 56(5): 21–27.
Pirenne, Henri.Early democracies in the Low Countries; urban society and political conflict in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (1963)online
Pirenne, Henri.Belgian Democracy Its Early History (1915)online
Pirenne, Henri. "The Formation and Constitution of the Burgundian State (Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries)."The American Historical Review. 14#32 p 477+, April 1909in JSTOR
Polansky, Janet L.Revolution in Brussels 1787–1793 (1987)
Strikwerda, C. J.Mass Politics and the Origin of Pluralism: Catholicism, Socialism and Flemish Nationalism in Nineteenth-Century Belgium (Lanham, MD and Leuven, 1997)
Strikwerda, C. J.Urban Structure, Religion and Language: Belgian Workers (1880–1914) (Ann Arbor, 1986)
VanYpersele, Laurence and Rousseaux, Xavier. "Leaving the War: Popular Violence and Judicial Repression of 'Unpatriotic' Behaviour in Belgium (1918–1921)",European Review of History 2005 12(1): 3–22.ISSN1350-7486 Fulltext:Ebsco
Blomme, J.The Economic Development of Belgian Agriculture, 1880–1980 (Leuven, 1992)
Clark, Samuel. "Nobility, Bourgeoisie and the Industrial Revolution in Belgium",Past & Present (1984) # 105 pp. 140–175;in JSTOR
Clough, Shepard B.A history of the Flemish Movement in Belgium: A study in nationalism (1930)
de Vries, Johan. "Benelux, 1920–1970", in C. M. Cipolla, ed.The Fontana Economic History of Europe: Contemporary Economics Part One (1976) pp. 1–71
Deschouwer, Kris. "Ethnic structure, inequality and governance of the public sector in Belgium."Ethnic Inequalities and Public Sector Governance I UNRISD/Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2006).online
Dhondt, Jan, and Marinette Bruwier in Carlo Cipolla,The Emergence of Industrial Societies-1 (Fontana, 1970) pp. 329–355
Houtte, J. A. van. "Economic Development of Belgium and the Netherlands from the Beginning of the Modern Era",Journal of European Economic History 1 (1972), pp. 100–120
Lijphart, Arend.Conflict and coexistence in Belgium: the dynamics of a culturally divided society (1981).
Milward, A. S. and S. B. Saul. The Economic Development of Continental Europe, 1780–1870 (1973), pp. 292–296, 432–453.online
Mokyr, Joel. "The Industrial Revolution in the Low Countries in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century: A Comparative Case Study",Journal of Economic History (1974) 34#2 pp. 365–399JSTOR2116987
Mokyr, J.Industrialization in the Low Countries, 1795–1850 (New Haven, 1976).
Mommens, A.The Belgian Economy in the Twentieth Century (London, 1994)
Silverman, Debora. "'Modernité Sans Frontières:' Culture, Politics, and the Boundaries of the Avant-Garde in King Leopold's Belgium, 1885–1910."American Imago (2011) 68#4 pp. 707–797.online
Zolberg, Aristide R. "The Making of Flemings and Walloons: Belgium: 1830–1914",Journal of Interdisciplinary History (1974) 5#2 pp. 179–235in JSTOR
Beyen, Marnix, and Benoît Majerus. "Weak and strong nations in the Low Countries: National historiography and its 'Others' in Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries." inThe contested nation: ethnicity, class, religion and gender in national histories (2008): 283–310.
Christiaens, Kim. "From the East to the South, and back? International solidarity movements in Belgium and new histories of the Cold War, 1950s–1970s."Dutch Crossing 39.3 (2015): 187–203.
Lagrou, Pieter. "Victims of genocide and national memory: Belgium, France and the Netherlands 1945-1965."Past & present 154 (1997): 181–222.online
Marnef, Guido. "Belgian and Dutch Post-war Historiography on the Protestant and Catholic Reformation in the Netherlands."Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte 100.1 (2009): 271–292.
Pasture, Patrick. "Views from Abroad. Foreign Historians on a Small State by the North Sea. With Reflections on Historical Writing in Belgium and Elsewhere."Revue Belge de Philologie et d'Histoire 35 (2005): 4+online[permanent dead link]
Silverman, Debora L. "Diasporas of art: history, the Tervuren Royal museum for Central Africa, and the politics of memory in Belgium, 1885–2014."Journal of Modern History 87.3 (2015): 615–667.online
Stanard, Matthew G. "Selling the Empire Between the Wars: Colonial Expositions in Belgium, 1920–1940."French Colonial History (2005) 6: 159–178.in JSTOR
Stanard, Matthew G. (2012).Selling the Congo: A history of European pro-empire propaganda and the making of Belgian imperialism. University of Nebraska Press.
Stanard, Matthew G. "Belgium, the Congo, and Imperial Immobility: A Singular Empire and the Historiography of the Single Analytic Field",French Colonial History (2014) 15 pp. 87–109.
Tollebeek, Jo. "Historical representation and the Nation-State in romantic Belgium (1830–1850)."Journal of the History of Ideas 59.2 (1998): 329–353.online
Tollebeek, Jo. "An Era of Grandeur. The Middle Ages in Belgian National Historiography, 1830–1914." inThe Uses of the Middle Ages in Modern European States (Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2011) pp. 113–135.
Van Den Bossche, G. M. H. "Historians as advisers to revolution? Imagining the Belgian nation." History of European ideas 24.3 (1998): 213–238.
Van den Braembussche, Antoon. "The silence of Belgium: Taboo and trauma in Belgian memory."Yale French Studies 102 (2002): 35–52.online
Van den Eeckhout, Patricia. "The quest for social history in Belgium (1948–1998)."Archiv für Sozialgeschichte 40 (2000): 321–336.online
Vanthemsche, Guy (2012).Belgium and the Congo, 1885–1980. Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0-5211-9421-1.
Verschaffel, Tom. "The modernization of historiography in 18th-century Belgium."History of European ideas 31.2 (2005): 135–146.online[dead link]
Vos, Louis. "Reconstructions of the past in Belgium and Flanders." inSecession, history and the social sciences(2002): 179–206.onlineArchived 2021-07-31 at theWayback Machine
Warland, Geneviève, ed.Experience and memory of the first World War in Belgium: Comparative and interdisciplinary insights (Waxmann Verlag, 2019)excerpt.
Wouters, Nico. "Historiography 1918-Today (Belgium)."International Encyclopedia of the First World War (2015): 1–11.online
H-Net listH-Low-Countries is published free by email and is edited by scholars. Its occasional messages deal with new journal issues, methodology, archives, and teaching methods,