The Hilbert matrices are canonical examples ofill-conditioned matrices, being notoriously difficult to use innumerical computation. For example, the 2-normcondition number of the matrix above is about 4.8×105.
Hilbert (1894) introduced the Hilbert matrix to study the following question inapproximation theory: "Assume thatI = [a,b], is a real interval. Is it then possible to find a non-zero polynomialP with integer coefficients, such that the integral
is smaller than any given boundε > 0, taken arbitrarily small?" To answer this question, Hilbert derives an exact formula for thedeterminant of the Hilbert matrices and investigates their asymptotics. He concludes that the answer to his question is positive if the lengthb −a of the interval is smaller than 4.
The determinant can be expressed inclosed form, as a special case of theCauchy determinant. The determinant of then ×n Hilbert matrix is
where
Hilbert already mentioned the curious fact that the determinant of the Hilbert matrix is the reciprocal of an integer (see sequenceOEIS: A005249 in theOEIS), which also follows from the identity
wheren is the order of the matrix.[1] It follows that the entries of the inverse matrix are all integers, and that the signs form a checkerboard pattern, being positive on theprincipal diagonal. For example,
The condition number of then × n Hilbert matrix grows as.
Themethod of moments applied to polynomial distributions results in aHankel matrix, which in the special case of approximating a probability distribution on the interval [0, 1] results in a Hilbert matrix. This matrix needs to be inverted to obtain the weight parameters of the polynomial distribution approximation.[2]