Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Heroism inThe Lord of the Rings

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Theme in Tolkien's fiction

J. R. R. Tolkien's presentation ofheroism inThe Lord of the Rings is based on medieval tradition, but modifies it, as there is no singlehero but a combination of heroes with contrasting attributes.Aragorn is the man born to be a hero, of a line of kings; he emerges from the wilds and is uniformly bold and restrained.Frodo is an unheroic, home-lovingHobbit who has heroism thrust upon him when he learns that the ring he has inherited from his cousinBilbo is theOne Ring that would enable the Dark LordSauron to dominate the whole ofMiddle-earth. His servantSam sets out to take care of his beloved master, and rises through the privations of thequest to destroy the Ring to become heroic.

Scholars have seenthe quest of the dissimilar heroes Aragorn and Frodo as a psychological journey ofindividuation, and from amythic point of view of marking the end of the old—in Frodo's quest with its bitter ending, and the start of the new, in Aragorn's.

The heroic aspects ofThe Lord of the Rings derive from sources includingBeowulf andAnglo-Saxon culture, seen especially in the society of theRiders of Rohan and its leadersThéoden,Éomer, andÉowyn; and from Germanic, especiallyOld Norse, myth and legend, seen for example in the culture of theDwarves.

Origins

[edit]

Beowulf's heroic culture

[edit]
Further information:Beowulf in Middle-earth

Tolkien was aphilologist and an expert in heroicAnglo-Saxon culture and literature, especiallyBeowulf. He derived many aspects ofThe Lord of the Rings from the poem, including the heroic culture of theRiders of Rohan, who resemble the Anglo-Saxons in everything including theirOld English language, except for Rohan's widespread use of horses.Théoden's hall, Meduseld (the word means "mead hall" inBeowulf), is modelled onBeowulf'sHeorot, as is the way it is guarded, visitors being repeatedly but courteously challenged.[1] The warhorns of the Riders of Rohan exemplify, in Shippey's view, the "heroic Northern world", as in what he calls the nearestBeowulf has to a moment of Tolkien-likeeucatastrophe, whenOngentheow'sGeats, trapped all night, hear the horns ofHygelac's men coming to rescue them; the Riders blow their horns wildly as they finally arrive, turning the tide of theBattle of the Pelennor Fields at a climactic moment inThe Lord of the Rings.[2][T 1]

Norse heroic culture

[edit]
Further information:Northern courage in Middle-earth
The Lord of the Rings heroesFrodo andAragorn both havemagic swords, likeKing Arthur (16th century statue pictured[3]).

Tolkien took the concept ofNorthern courage fromNorse mythology, where even the gods know they are doomed and everything comes to an end. The Tolkien scholarMarjorie Burns writes that the theme of courageous action in the face of inevitable loss inThe Lord of the Rings is borrowed from the Nordic world view which emphasises "imminent or threatening destruction".[4] In Norse mythology, this began during the creation: in the realm of fire,Muspell, thejötunnSurt was even then awaiting the end of the world. Burns comments that "Here is a mythology where even the gods can die".[4]

Receiving the magic sword

[edit]
Further information:Naming of weapons in Middle-earth

The Tolkien scholarVerlyn Flieger writes that heroes likeSigurd in theVolsungasaga havenamed, magic swords, and that acquiring such a weapon is a key moment in becoming a hero. Frodo is given his sword by his "uncle", Bilbo – Flieger comments that the uncle-nephew relationship is also traditional for pairs of heroes, such as Cuchulainn and Conchobar, Tristan and Mark, Roland and Charlemagne, Gawain and Arthur, and Beowulf and Hygelac.[5]

Flieger notes however that while Sigmund's sword was broken, and it was reforged for Sigurd, Frodo already had a sword: it was broken by theLord of the Nazgûl, and he never carries it again. In theVolsungasaga, the godOdin thrusts the sword into a tree; Sigmund acquires it by pulling it out. Similarly,Arthur pulls his sword out of an ironanvil;Galahad, in anotherArthurian legend, pulls his sword from a stone, magically floating in a lake.[5] Flieger writes that Tolkien reverses the order of events: Frodo's sword has already been broken, so Bilbo produces his own small sword,Sting, from his adventures long ago, as narrated inThe Hobbit, casually thrusts it into a wooden beam in his room inRivendell, and suggests that Frodo might like it. Frodo pulls it out without fuss, an unheroic hero, but "the torch has passed" and Frodo is "align[ed] with his epic forebears".[5]

Aragorn too has a sword which was broken: the ancient and magical swordNarsil, of his distant ancestorElendil, whose sonIsildur used it to defeat the Dark LordSauron by cutting the Ring from his hand. Like Frodo, Aragorn arrives in Rivendell, and there he too receives a magic weapon: his sword is reforged, asAndúril, "Flame of the West". Unlike Frodo's acquisition of Sting, the transformation of Narsil to Andúril is directly heroic; but both weapons, like the magic swords of medieval legend, shine with their own light in the presence of enemies.[5]

Fairy tale

[edit]

Tolkien's essayOn Fairy-Stories was delivered as anAndrew Lang lecture in 1939[6] and published in different collections of his essays from 1947 onwards. In it, Tolkien makes clear that he considersfairy tales an importantgenre, which he explains and defends; the essence of a fairy story is the universal journey of the hero, the traveller through life, facing the dangers, seeking his desires including the "Escape from Death", and emerging victorious.[T 2][5]

Analysis

[edit]
Diagram of Patrick Grant'sJungian view ofThe Lord of the Rings with hero, anima and otherarchetypes; the hero is composed both of the nobleAragorn and the small home-lovingFrodo.[7]
Further information:Character pairing in The Lord of the Rings andPsychological journeys of Middle-earth

Jungian archetypes

[edit]

Patrick Grant, a scholar ofRenaissance literature, interpreted the interactions of the characters as fitting the oppositions and other pairwise relationships ofJungian archetypes, recurring psychological symbols proposed byCarl Jung. He stated that the Hero archetype appears inThe Lord of the Rings both in noble and powerful form as Aragorn, and in childlike form asFrodo, whose quest can be interpreted as a personal journey ofindividuation. They are opposed by theRingwraiths. Frodo'sanima is the Elf-queen Galadriel; the Hero is assisted by the Old Wise Man archetype in the shape of the WizardGandalf. Frodo's Shadow is the monstrousGollum, appropriately in Grant's view, also a male Hobbit like Frodo. All of these, together with other characters in the book, create an image of the self.[7]

Contrasted heroes

[edit]

Flieger contrasts the warrior-heroAragorn with the suffering heroFrodo. Aragorn is, like Beowulf, an epic/romance hero, a bold leader and a healer-king. Frodo is "the little man of fairy tale", the little brother who unexpectedly turns out to be brave. But the fairy talehappy ending comes to Aragorn, marrying the beautiful princess (Arwen) and winning the kingdom (Gondor andArnor); while Frodo, who returns home miserable, with neither Ring nor appreciation by the people of the Shire, gets "defeat and disillusionment—the stark, bitter ending typical of theIliad,Beowulf, theMorte D'Arthur".[5] In other words, the two types of hero are not only contrasted, but combined, halves of their legends swapped over. Flieger comments that the two together mark the end of the old, with Frodo's bitter end and the disappearance of the Ring, the Elves, and much else that was beautiful; and the start of the new, with Aragorn's rise to the throne of Gondor and Arnor, and a world of Men.[5]

Flieger's analysis of heroes inBeowulf,fairy tales, andThe Lord of the Rings[5]
BeowulfFairy tale heroAragornFrodo
Bold hero, victoriousBattle of Helm's Deep,
Battle of the Pelennor Fields
Small beginnings:
Little man sets out on quest
Hobbit (small man) feels unheroic, accepts quest unwillingly;
sets out not knowing where he's going
Bitter endingDefeat and disillusionment afterthe quest
Happy ending:
Returns home rich, marries princess
King ofGondor andArnor
MarriesElf-princessArwen

The Tolkien scholarsThomas Honegger andJohn D. Rateliff write that this "important" argument of Flieger's was so convincing that it remained unchallenged until in 2000 George Clark pointed to Sam as the "true hero".[8][9]

Unheroic hero

[edit]

A third figure takes on the mantle of hero in the story,Samwise "Sam" Gamgee, Frodo's gardener. He sets out entirely unheroically, like Frodo a Hobbit but even less significant than him, being his gardener. He beginsthe quest as a servant, but through service comes to be a genuinely heroic figure, his simple courage and devotion sustaining the quest. Tolkien wrote in a private letter: "My Sam Gamgee is indeed a reflexion of the English soldier, of the privates andbatmen I knew inthe 1914 war, and recognised as so far superior to myself."[T 3] and elsewhere: "Sam was cocksure, and deep down a little conceited; but his conceit had been transformed by his devotion to Frodo. He did not think of himself as heroic or even brave, or in any way admirable – except in his service and loyalty to his master."[T 4] He ends up asmayor ofthe Shire for seven seven-year terms.[T 5] Tolkien admired heroism born of loyalty and love, but despised arrogance, pride and wilfulness, notes the scholarElizabeth Solopova. The courage and loyalty that Sam displayed on his journey with Frodo, she adds, is the kind of northern courage that Tolkien praised in his essays on the Old English poem "The Battle of Maldon".[10]

Unchivalric heroes

[edit]
Illustration of Arthurian chivalric knight
Tolkien rejected the armoured nobility andcourtly love of thechivalric knight (illustrated) in favour of small humblehobbits and half-wild, mistrustedrangers as his heroes.[11]

Ben Reinhard writes inMythlore that Aragorn and Frodo lack one traditional component of heroism, indeed of the heroic romance that Tolkien was popularising: knightlychivalry. He notes that Tolkien does use the word "knight", but ties it to a pre-chivalric concept of knighthood, that of Old English heroes likeBeowulf rather thanArthurian chivalric heroes likeLancelot andGalahad. Further, while there are heroicsupporting characters – Reinhard mentionsBard,Beorn, Gandalf, andThorin, none of them are chivalric either.[11] Knights on horseback in shining armour do exist: the men ofDol Amroth come toMinas Tirith as "knights in full harness",[T 6] and their prince, Imrahil, wears "bright-burnishedvambrace[s]".[T 7] All the same, Reinhard writes, knights are certainly played down in the narrative. He notes that this might seem surprising, and discusses why Tolkien decided on a heroism without chivalry. Tolkien disliked the connection of chivalric romance with French culture: he expressed distaste for both its food and its language. Further, he regretted that almost all of England's pre-Christian mythology had been lost; he set out to createa mythology for England. That meant that Tolkien could hardly introduce French-style chivalric knights, so he needed "a new kind of hero—or, better yet,two kinds of hero: the halfling and the ranger. In place of the powerful and nobleknight errant, we have (on the one hand) the modern, bourgeois, and above allsmall hobbits or (on the other) the half-wild, mistrusted rangers."[11] Reinhard observes that this allows the Catholic Tolkien toexpress the Christian vision as described in theMagnificat of "put[ting] down the mighty from their seat, and exalt[ing] the humble and meek".[11]

Ben Reinhard's comparison of Tolkien's heroes and traditional chivalric knights[11]
Type of heroExampleCharacteristics
Chivalric knightLancelotNoble, French-style; powerful, armoured, on horseback;courtly love; success assured
HobbitFrodo Baggins"modern,bourgeois, ... small"; humble; success far from guaranteed
RangerAragorn"half-wild, mistrusted"; "stern in battle, gentle in hall";ascetic; universally scorned

References

[edit]

Primary

[edit]
  1. ^Tolkien 1955, book 5, ch. 4, "The Siege of Gondor"
  2. ^Tolkien 1964, "On Fairy-Stories", pp. 11–70
  3. ^Carpenter 1977, p. 89
  4. ^Carpenter 2023, letter 246 to Eileen Elgar, September 1963
  5. ^Tolkien 1955, Appendix B, "The Tale of Years", "Later Events Concerning the Members of the Fellowship of the Ring"
  6. ^Tolkien 1955, book 5, ch. 1, "Minas Tirith"
  7. ^Tolkien 1955, book 5, ch. 6, "The Battle of the Pelennor Fields"

Secondary

[edit]
  1. ^Shippey 2005, pp. 139–143
  2. ^Shippey 2001, pp. 212–216.
  3. ^Barber 1986, p. 141.
  4. ^abBurns 1989, pp. 5–9
  5. ^abcdefghFlieger 2004, pp. 122–145.
  6. ^"Inside Tolkien's Mind". University of St Andrews. 4 March 2004. Archived fromthe original on 10 March 2007. Retrieved24 November 2018.
  7. ^abGrant 1973, pp. 365–380.
  8. ^Honegger & Rateliff 2018, p. 157.
  9. ^Clark 2000, pp. 39–51.
  10. ^Solopova 2009, pp. 40–42.
  11. ^abcdeReinhard, Ben (2020)."Tolkien's Lost Knights".Mythlore.39 (1). Article 9.

Sources

[edit]
About
Elements
Languages
Poetry
Other
Analysis
Themes
Influences
Techniques
Peoples
Maiar
Free
peoples
Monsters
Other
World
Geography
Battles
Things
Related
works
Books
Illustrations
Theatre
Music
Radio
Film
Animated
Peter Jackson
series
Music
Approach
Other
Fan-made
Video games
The Lord of the Rings Online
Tabletop role-
playing games
Board games
Card games
Other games
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heroism_in_The_Lord_of_the_Rings&oldid=1309306090"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp