Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Griesmer site

Coordinates:41°11′17″N87°26′53″W / 41.18806°N 87.44806°W /41.18806; -87.44806
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromGriesmer Site)
Archaeological site in Indiana, United States
Griesmer Site
Griesmer site is located in Indiana
Griesmer site
Location inIndiana
Show map of Indiana
Griesmer site is located in the United States
Griesmer site
Location in United States
Show map of the United States
Locationon theKankakee River nearSchneider, Indiana
Coordinates41°11′17″N87°26′53″W / 41.18806°N 87.44806°W /41.18806; -87.44806

The Griesmer Site (La-3) is located on theKankakee River inLake County, Indiana, about a mile southeast ofSchneider, in Northwestern Indiana. It is classified as aPrehistoric, multi-component site withMiddle Woodland (c. 100 B.C-500 A.D.),Late Woodland (c. 500 A.D.–1500 A.D.) andUpper Mississippian (c. 1000–1500 A. D.) occupations. The deposits were not stratified, but observation of the types of artifacts present, together with radiocarbon dates, helped to define the sequence of occupations at the site.[1]

History of archaeological investigations

[edit]

The site was excavated under the auspices of theIndiana Historical Society in 1962. Five years later, the site was completely destroyed by sand removal activities.[1]

Results of 1962 excavations

[edit]

The excavations yielded features,prehistoric artifacts, animal bone, and plant remains.[1]

Features

[edit]

Except for a hearth feature, all of the features were associated with theUpper Mississippian occupation. The following types of features were reported:[1]

  • Type A – refuse pits (10)
  • Type B – deep pits devoid of material (8)
  • Type C – deep pits with plant remains including tubers of thewhite water lily (Nymphaea tuberosa); interpreted as roasting pits (49)
  • Type D – deep roasting pits withmussel midden on top (8)
  • Type E – cache pit withsiltstone discs (1)

A total of 94 post molds were noted, and their placement indicated the presence of at least two structures.[1]

Animal bone

[edit]

Over 4,700 animal bones and 8,193mussel shells were recovered. The most common types of animal remains wereturtle,deer,elk andfish.[1]

Artifacts

[edit]

Artifacts recovered from the site included:[1]

  • Pottery (1,769 pot sherds) – to be discussed in more detail below
  • Chippedstone tools (2,113 chipped stone artifacts, of which 301 were tools, including 74projectile points), 16 biface knives, 7 uniface knives, 4 gravers, 63 scrapers (of which 15 were uniface humpbacked end scrapers), 6 drills, and 2 blades.
  • Groundstone tools (5), including a grinding stone, 2 arrow shaft straighteners, 5 hammer stones, and 1 mano/grinding stone
  • Bone tools (51), including 3 antler projectile points, 5 scapula hoes (4 from elk scapula and 1 from bison scapula), 1 antler pick, 1 deer skull spoon or scoop, 1 deer cannon bone beamer, 2 scapula knife or scraper, 1 worked beaver incisor, 1 antler flaker, 1 bone flaker, 3 beads, and 5 antler cylinders which may have been used as gaming pieces.
  • Pipes – 1 fragment of an effigy turtle head pipe
  • Copper artifact (1) – tinkler/cone

The non-pottery artifacts found at an archaeological site can provide useful cultural context as well as a glimpse into the domestic tasks performed at a site; ceremonial or religious activities; recreational activities; and clothing or personal adornment.

Some of the most prominent and diagnostic non-pottery artifacts are presented here in more detail:

MaterialDescriptionImageQtyFunction / useComments / associations
Chipped stoneSmall triangular points (aka Madison points)Projectile points63, divided into 3 subgroupsHunting/fishing/warfareAlso known as "arrowheads"; are thought to be arrow-tips forbows-and-arrows. The usage of the bow-and-arrow seems to have greatly increased during theLate Woodland, probably as a result of increased conflict.[2][3]
Chipped stoneBiface blades/knivesBiface knives16Domestic function / cutting applicationsTypical of Upper Mississippian sites, particularly Huber and Oneota (Orr focus)
Chipped stoneUniface humpback end scraperEnd scrapers15Domestic function / processing wood or hidesTypical of Upper Mississippian sites, particularly Huber and Oneota (Orr focus)
Chipped stoneDrillsDrills6Domestic function / processing wood or hides2 types are present; double pointed and expanded base, which are both common types in Upper Mississippian contexts
StoneArrow shaft straightenerArrow shaft straightener2Domestic function / straightening arrow shafts for bows-and-arrowsTypical at Upper Mississippian sites
AntlerAntler projectile points; socketed and tangedAntler projectile points3Hunting/fishing/warfareThe tanged or barbed type is characteristic of Fisher; the unbarbed type is more typical of Oneota
BoneDeer skull spoon or scoopDeer skull spoon1Domestic function / probably food preparation or servingThis artifact is uncommon and has not been reported for other sites in the area
BoneDeer cannon bone beamerDeer cannon bone beamer1Domestic function / hide-working toolCommonly found at Fisher and Langford sites
BoneScapula hoesElk scapula hoe5 (4 with elk scapula, one with bison scapula)Domestic function / Agricultural-horticultural or general digging toolCommon at Fisher and Oneota sites; they may have been used to dig out the pit features present at Griesmer.
BoneScapula knife or scraperScapula knife or scraper2Domestic function / cutting applicationsThis artifact has been found at other sites in the Midwest, especially Illinois, and is variously defined as a "knife", "scraper", "spade" or "celt"
BoneBone beadsBone beads3Personal adornment and/or ceremonial function / hair beadCommon at Upper Mississippian sites; may have been used for personal adornment and/or as part of a costume for a ceremony
BoneBone cylinders / game piecesAntler cylinder game pieces5Entertainment functionThese have been found at Fisher, Huber, Langford and Oneota (especially Grand River focus and Lake Winnebago focus) and may have been used in a gambling game. Gambling was noted to be a popular pastime among the early Native American tribes.
StoneTurtle-head effigy pipe fragmentEffigy pipe1Ceremonial–recreational function / pipe smokingEffigy pipes are not common among Upper Mississippian cultures; this item may have been obtained through trade. They are common at Whittlesey sites in northern Ohio, and have been reported from the Late Woodland Dumaw Creek Site in Michigan.

Occupations and associated pottery types

[edit]

Middle Woodland

[edit]

There was a smallMiddle Woodland component discovered at the site. Most of the pottery from this component was of the type Havana Ware (also known as Goodall focus).[1][4] The Havana Culture was thought to be a local variant of the main Middle Woodland, which was dominated by theAdena andHopewell cultures of theMississippi andOhio River Valleys. Middle Woodland cultures are characterized by their largeburial mounds, some of which are still visible today; as well as their distinctive pottery forms, ceremonial practices,agricultural activities, and widespreadtrade networks.[2]

Late Woodland

[edit]

TheLate Woodland period in theGreat Lakes region was characterized by the introduction ofmaize agriculture, which allowed for more efficient food production. In turn, this led to population increases and this led in turn to increased competition for resources, resulting in more conflict/warfare.[2]

There were a few potsherds which indicated the presence of Late Woodland peoples / cultures at some point. This could have been at any time from the end of the Middle Woodland (c. A.D. 500) to European contact (after 1600 A.D.).

Upper Mississippian

[edit]

TheUpper Mississippian occupation is the main component at the Griesmer Site. Two radiocarbon dates of AD 1520 and 1530 indicate this site was occupied slightly before European contact.[1]

After 1000 AD, there was increased interaction and influence from the Mississippian cultures of the Mississippi River Valley. The local cultures in the Great Lakes region influenced by the Mississippians are designated as Upper Mississippians by archaeologists. Some of the cultures designated as Upper Mississippian are theOneota complex with its various foci.[2]

The Fisher and Huber pottery types are the most common encountered during the Griesmer excavations. Fisher and Huber are either considered foci of the Oneota complex by archaeologists, or closely related to Oneota. Charles Faulkner in 1972 developed atypology of pottery descriptions for these two types based on specimens from the Griesmer Site and comparisons with other nearby sites with similar pottery.[1]

Fisher ware
[edit]
Fifield bold vessel

Fisher Ware was first described at theFisher Mound Site in northeasternIllinois near the mouth of theIllinois River.[5] It has also been noted at the Anker[6] and Boumanville[7] sites nearChicago, Illinois, and theFifield Site inIndiana.[1]

This pottery is characterized by shelltempering, predominantlycordmarked surfaces, trailed or incised decoration and straight, excurved or flaring rims. Notched lips and rim lugs are also common.[1]

Two specific types of Fisher ware were identified at Griesmer and described by Faulkner:

  • Fifield trailed (13 vessels) – characterized by trailed horizontal and/or vertical lines over smooth or cordmarked surface; often there are also punctates that form decorative patterns in conjunction with the trailed lines. Notched or crimped lips are also common.[1]
  • Fifield bold (3 vessels) – characterized by finger trailed vertical lines over cordmarked surfaces.[1]
Huber ware
[edit]
Huber trailed vessel

Huber ware is common at the Huber,[8] Anker,[6] Oak Forest[9][10] and Hoxie Farm sites[8] nearChicago,Illinois; and atMoccasin Bluff[11] andSchwerdt[12] in southwesternMichigan where it is part of the Berrien Phase. At the Oak Forest Site, this ware has been associated with earlyHistoric artifacts, which indicates the pottery was still being made at the time ofEuropean contact.[9][10] The exact cultural affiliation has not been determined but it has been suggested that the makers of this pottery may be theMiami orPotawatomi tribe.[11]

This pottery is characterized by shell tempering, predominantly smooth surfaces either plain or decorated by fine vertical incised lines, excurved or flared rims, and often fine notching on the lip. Strap handles or loops are present on some vessels. Some of theUpper Mississippian vessels found at Griesmer are identified as coranders based on sherds with holes in them. Coranders are a very rare vessel form in the area. Most of these sherds came from Huber ware. Miniature vessels are also present at Griesmer, and most of them appear to be Huber ware as well.[1]

Four specific types of Huber ware were identified at Griesmer:[1]

  • Huber plain (2 vessels) – characterized by plain smooth surfaces with notched lips being the only decoration.
  • Huber cordmarked (4 vessels) – characterized bycordmarked shoulder and body and notched orcordmarked lip. This type is very similar to Fisher Cordmarked except for small details in the manufacture and appearance of the cordmarked surfaces, and the fact that Huber Cordmarked surfaces are more often smoothed-over.
  • Huber trailed (12 vessels) – characterized by smooth surfaces with fine trailed or incised lines. The lines most often vertical or slant to the right.
  • Huber bold – this type was identified only on the basis of body sherds, none of them which could be matched to a rim. The lines are finger-trailed and mostly appear to have been applied vertically.

Significance

[edit]

The Griesmer Site is a multi-componentPrehistoric site with the largeUpper Mississippian occupation being the most prominent. The Fisher and Huber pottery, along with the radiocarbon dates, indicate the site was occupied almost to the time of European contact. The excavators felt that the season of occupation was late spring to early summer, and that the site was a short-term encampment instead of a permanent agricultural village.[1] A similar short-term encampment has been identified at theSchwerdt Site on theKalamazoo River in southwesternMichigan. Schwerdt had similar deep roasting pits with water lily tubers present along withsturgeon bone. The ceramics at Schwerdt were designated as Berrien Phase; including shell-tempered pottery which can be assigned to Huber ware, along with grit-tempered local Late Woodland types.[12]

Unfortunately it cannot be said with confidence which cultural or tribal entities created the Fisher and Huber pottery at Griesmer, but thePotawatomi andMiami have been suggested, based on the fact that both of these tribes were present in the area during early Historic times.[11]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdefghijklmnopqFaulkner, Charles H. (1972). "The Late Prehistoric Occupation of Northwestern Indiana: A Study of the Upper Mississippi Cultures of the Kankakee Valley".Prehistory Research Series.V (1). Indianapolis, Indiana: Indiana Historical Society:1–222.
  2. ^abcdMason, Ronald J. (1981).Great Lakes Archaeology. New York, New York: Academic Press, Incl.
  3. ^Lepper, Bradley T. (2005).Ohio Archaeology (4th ed.). Wilmington, Ohio: Orange Frazer Press.
  4. ^Quimby, George I. (1941). "The Goodall focus: An Analysis of Ten Hopewellian Components in Michigan and Indiana".Prehistory Research Series.2 (2). Indianapolis, Indiana: Indiana Historical Society.
  5. ^Langford, George (1927). "The Fisher Mound Group, Successive Aboriginal Occupations near the Mouth of the Illinois River".American Anthropologist.21 (3):153–206.
  6. ^abBluhm, Elaine A. and Allen Liss (1961). "The Anker Site, in Chicago Area Archaeology" (Bulletin No. 3). Urbana, Illinois: Illinois Archaeological Survey:89–137.{{cite journal}}:Cite journal requires|journal= (help)
  7. ^Fenner, Gloria J. (1961). "The Boumanville Site" (Bulletin No. 3). Urbana, Illinois: Illinois Archaeological Survey:37–56.{{cite journal}}:Cite journal requires|journal= (help)
  8. ^abHerold, Elaine Bluhm, Patricia J. O'Brien and David J. Wenner Jr. (1990).Hoxie Farm and Huber: Two Upper Mississippian Archaeological Sites in Cook County, Illinois, in At The Edge of Prehistory: Huber Phase Archaeology in the Chicago Area, edited by James A. Brown and Patricia J. O'Brien. Kampsville, Illinois: Center for American Archaeology.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. ^abBluhm, Elaine A. and Gloria J. Fenner (1961). "The Oak Forest Site, in Chicago Area Archaeology" (Bulletin No. 3). Urbana, Illinois: Illinois Archaeological Survey.{{cite journal}}:Cite journal requires|journal= (help)
  10. ^abBrown, James A., ed. (1990).The Oak Forest Site: Investigations into Oneota Subsistence-Settlement in the Cal-Sag Area of Cook County, Illinois, in At The Edge of Prehistory: Huber Phase Archaeology in the Chicago Area, edited by James A. Brown and Patricia J. O'Brien. Kampsville, Illinois: Center for American Archaeology.
  11. ^abcBettarel, Robert Louis and Hale G. Smith (1973).The Moccasin Bluff Site and the Woodland Cultures of Southwestern Michigan. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology.
  12. ^abMcAllister, Paul W. (1980).The Schwerdt Site (20AE127) Ceramics: A Berrien Phase Ceramic Assemblage in Allegan County, Michigan (Masters Thesis). Kalamazoo, Michigan: Western Michigan University.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Charles H. Faulkner (1972), "The Late Prehistoric Occupation of Northwestern Indiana: A Study of the Upper Mississippi Cultures of the Kankakee Valley",Prehistory Research Series, Indiana Historical Society, Indianapolis, Indiana,V (1):1–222
Middle
Mississippian
American Bottom
and Upper Mississippi
Lower Ohio River and
Confluence area
Middle Ohio River
Tennessee and
Cumberland
Central and Lower
Mississippi
South Appalachian
Mississippian
Fort Walton culture
Pensacola culture
Plaquemine
Mississippian
Caddoan
Mississippian
Upper Mississippian
cultures
Oneota
Fort Ancient culture
Culture
Agriculture
Artwork
Languages
Religion
Archaeological
cultures
Archaeological
sites
Human
remains
Miscellaneous
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Griesmer_site&oldid=1319267776"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp