Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Gram-positive bacteria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bacteria that give a positive result in the Gram stain test
Rod-shaped Gram-positiveBacillus anthracis bacteria in acerebrospinal fluid sample stand out from roundwhite blood cells, which also accept thecrystal violet stain.
Violet-stained Gram-positivecocci and pink-stainedGram-negativebacilli

Inbacteriology,Gram-positive bacteria arebacteria that give a positive result in theGram stain test, which is traditionally used to quickly classify bacteria into two broad categories according to their type ofcell wall.

The Gram stain is used by microbiologists to place bacteria into two main categories, Gram-positive (+) andGram-negative (−). Gram-positive bacteria have a thick layer ofpeptidoglycan within the cell wall, and Gram-negative bacteria have a thin layer of peptidoglycan.

Gram-positive bacteria retain thecrystal violet stain used in the test, resulting in a purple color when observed through anoptical microscope. The thick layer of peptidoglycan in the bacterial cell wall retains thestain after it has been fixed in place by iodine. During the decolorization step, the decolorizer removes crystal violet from all other cells.

Conversely,Gram-negative bacteria cannot retain the violet stain after the decolorization step;alcohol used in this stage degrades the outer membrane of Gram-negative cells, making the cell wall more porous and incapable of retaining the crystal violet stain. Their peptidoglycan layer is much thinner and sandwiched between aninner cell membrane and abacterial outer membrane, causing them to take up thecounterstain (safranin orfuchsine) and appear red or pink.

Despite their thicker peptidoglycan layer, Gram-positive bacteria are more receptive to certaincell wall–targetingantibiotics than Gram-negative bacteria, due to the absence of the outer membrane.[1]

Characteristics

[edit]
Gram-positive and Gram-negative cell wall structure
Structure of Gram-positive cell wall

In general, the following characteristics are present in Gram-positive bacteria:[2]

  1. Cytoplasmic lipid membrane
  2. Thickpeptidoglycan layer
  3. Teichoic acids and lipoids are present, forminglipoteichoic acids, which serve aschelating agents, and also for certain types of adherence.
  4. Peptidoglycan chains are cross-linked to form rigid cell walls by a bacterial enzymeDD-transpeptidase.
  5. A much smaller volume ofperiplasm than that in Gram-negative bacteria.

Only some species have acapsule, usually consisting ofpolysaccharides. Only some species areflagellates, and those withflagella have just twobasal body rings for support, in contrast to the four found in Gram-negative bacteria. Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria commonly have a surface layer called anS-layer. In Gram-positive bacteria, the S-layer is attached to the peptidoglycan layer. Gram-negative bacteria's S-layer is attached directly to theouter membrane. Specific to Gram-positive bacteria is the presence ofteichoic acids in the cell wall. Some of these are lipoteichoic acids, which have a lipid component in the cell membrane that can assist in anchoring the peptidoglycan.[3]

Classification

[edit]

Along withcell shape,Gram staining is a rapid method used to differentiate bacterial species. Such staining, together with growth requirement and antibiotic susceptibility testing, and other macroscopic and physiologic tests, forms a basis for practical classification and subdivision of the bacteria (e.g., see figure and pre-1990 versions ofBergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology).[citation needed]

Species identification hierarchy in clinical settings

Historically, the kingdomMonera was divided into fourdivisions based primarily on Gram staining:Bacillota (positive in staining),Gracilicutes (negative in staining),Mollicutes (neutral in staining) and Mendocutes (variable in staining).[4] Based on16S ribosomal RNA phylogenetic studies of the late microbiologistCarl Woese and collaborators and colleagues at theUniversity of Illinois, themonophyly of the Gram-positive bacteria was challenged,[5] with major implications for the therapeutic and general study of these organisms. Based onmolecular studies of the 16S sequences, Woese recognised twelvebacterial phyla. Two of these were Gram-positive and were divided on the proportion of theguanine andcytosine content in theirDNA. The high G + C phylum was made up of theActinobacteria, and the low G + C phylum contained theFirmicutes.[5] The Actinomycetota include theCorynebacterium,Mycobacterium,Nocardia andStreptomyces genera. The (low G + C) Bacillota, have a 45–60% GC content, but this is lower than that of the Actinomycetota.[2]

Importance of the outer cell membrane in bacterial classification

[edit]
It has been suggested that this section besplit out into another article titledGram stain. (Discuss)(November 2023)
The structure of peptidoglycan, composed ofN-acetylglucosamine andN-acetylmuramic acid

Although bacteria are traditionally divided into two main groups, Gram-positive and Gram-negative, based on theirGram stain retention property, this classification system is ambiguous as it refers to three distinct aspects (staining result, envelope organization, taxonomic group), which do not necessarily coalesce for some bacterial species.[6][7][8][9] The Gram-positive and Gram-negative staining response is also not a reliable characteristic as these two kinds of bacteria do not form phylogenetic coherent groups.[6] However, although Gram staining response is an empirical criterion, its basis lies in the marked differences in the ultrastructure and chemical composition of the bacterial cell wall, marked by the absence or presence of an outer lipid membrane.[6][10]

All Gram-positive bacteria are bound by a single-unit lipid membrane, and, in general, they contain a thick layer (20–80 nm) of peptidoglycan responsible for retaining the Gram stain. A number of other bacteria—that are bound by a single membrane, but stain Gram-negative due to either lack of the peptidoglycan layer, as in themycoplasmas, or their inability to retain the Gram stain because of their cell wall composition—also show close relationship to the Gram-positive bacteria. For the bacterial cells bound by a single cell membrane, the termmonoderm bacteria has been proposed.[6][10]

In contrast to Gram-positive bacteria, all typical Gram-negative bacteria are bound by a cytoplasmic membrane and an outer cell membrane; they contain only a thin layer of peptidoglycan (2–3 nm) between these membranes. The presence of inner and outer cell membranes defines a new compartment in these cells: theperiplasmic space or the periplasmic compartment. These bacteria have been designated asdiderm bacteria.[6][10] The distinction between the monoderm and diderm bacteria is supported by conserved signature indels in a number of important proteins (viz. DnaK, GroEL).[6][7][10][11] Of these two structurally distinct groups of bacteria, monoderms are indicated to be ancestral. Based upon a number of observations including that the Gram-positive bacteria are the major producers of antibiotics and that, in general, Gram-negative bacteria are resistant to them, it has been proposed that the outer cell membrane in Gram-negative bacteria (diderms) has evolved as a protective mechanism againstantibiotic selection pressure.[6][7][10][11] Some bacteria, such asDeinococcus, which stain Gram-positive due to the presence of a thick peptidoglycan layer and also possess an outer cell membrane are suggested as intermediates in the transition between monoderm (Gram-positive) and diderm (Gram-negative) bacteria.[6][11] The diderm bacteria can also be further differentiated between simple diderms lacking lipopolysaccharide, the archetypical diderm bacteria where the outer cell membrane contains lipopolysaccharide, and the diderm bacteria where outer cell membrane is made up ofmycolic acid.[8][11][12]

Exceptions

[edit]

In general, Gram-positive bacteria are monoderms and have a singlelipid bilayer whereas Gram-negative bacteria are diderms and have two bilayers. Exceptions include:

Some Bacillota species are not Gram-positive. The class Negativicutes, which includesSelenomonas, are diderm and stain Gram-negative.[12] Additionally, a number of bacterial taxa (viz.Negativicutes,Fusobacteriota,Synergistota, andElusimicrobiota) that are either part of the phylum Bacillota or branch in its proximity are found to possess a diderm cell structure.[9][11][12] However, a conserved signature indel (CSI) in theHSP60 (GroEL) protein distinguishes all traditional phyla of Gram-negative bacteria (e.g.,Pseudomonadota,Aquificota,Chlamydiota,Bacteroidota,Chlorobiota, "Cyanobacteria",Fibrobacterota,Verrucomicrobiota,Planctomycetota,Spirochaetota,Acidobacteriota) from these other atypical diderm bacteria, as well as other phyla of monoderm bacteria (e.g.,Actinomycetota,Bacillota,Thermotogota,Chloroflexota).[11] The presence of this CSI in all sequenced species of conventional LPS (lipopolysaccharide)-containing Gram-negative bacterial phyla provides evidence that these phyla of bacteria form a monophyletic clade and that no loss of the outer membrane from any species from this group has occurred.[11]

Pathogenicity

[edit]
Colonies of a Gram-positive pathogen of the oral cavity,Actinomyces sp.

In the classical sense, six Gram-positive genera are typically pathogenic in humans. Two of these,Streptococcus andStaphylococcus, arecocci (sphere-shaped). The remaining organisms arebacilli (rod-shaped) and can be subdivided based on their ability to formspores. The non-spore formers areCorynebacterium andListeria (a coccobacillus), whereasBacillus andClostridium produce spores.[17] The spore-forming bacteria can again be divided based on theirrespiration:Bacillus is afacultative anaerobe, whileClostridium is anobligate anaerobe.[18] Also,Rathybacter,Leifsonia, andClavibacter are three Gram-positive genera that cause plant disease. Gram-positive bacteria are capable of causing serious and sometimes fatalinfections in newborn infants.[19] Novel species of clinically relevant Gram-positive bacteria also includeCatabacter hongkongensis, which is an emerging pathogen belonging toBacillota.[20]

Bacterial transformation

[edit]

Transformation is one of three processes forhorizontal gene transfer, in which exogenous genetic material passes from a donor bacterium to a recipient bacterium, the other two processes beingconjugation (transfer ofgenetic material between two bacterial cells in direct contact) andtransduction (injection of donor bacterial DNA by abacteriophage virus into a recipient host bacterium).[21][22] In transformation, the genetic material passes through the intervening medium, and uptake is completely dependent on the recipient bacterium.[21]

As of 2014 about 80 species of bacteria were known to be capable of transformation, about evenly divided between Gram-positive andGram-negative bacteria; the number might be an overestimate since several of the reports are supported by single papers.[21] Transformation among Gram-positive bacteria has been studied in medically important species such asStreptococcus pneumoniae,Streptococcus mutans,Staphylococcus aureus andStreptococcus sanguinis and in Gram-positive soil bacteriaBacillus subtilis andBacillus cereus.[23]

Orthography: capitalization

[edit]

The adjectivesGram-positive andGram-negative derive from the surname ofHans Christian Gram; aseponymous adjectives, their initial letterG can be either a capital or lower-case, depending on whichstyle guide, if any, governs the document being written. For instance, the style guide of the AmericanCDC recommends writing:Gram stain,this species is gram negative, anda gram-negative species.[24]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Basic Biology (18 March 2016)."Bacteria".
  2. ^abMadigan, Michael T.; Martinko, John M. (2006).Brock Biology of Microorganisms (11th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.ISBN 978-0131443297.
  3. ^Brown, Stephanie; Santa Maria, John P.; Walker, Suzanne (2013-09-08)."Wall Teichoic Acids of Gram-Positive Bacteria".Annual Review of Microbiology.67 (1):313–336.doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155620.ISSN 0066-4227.PMC 3883102.PMID 24024634.
  4. ^Gibbons, N.E.; Murray, R.G.E. (1978)."Proposals Concerning the Higher Taxa of Bacteria".International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.28 (1):1–6.doi:10.1099/00207713-28-1-1.
  5. ^abWoese, C.R. (1987)."Bacterial evolution".Microbiological Reviews.51 (2):221–271.doi:10.1128/MMBR.51.2.221-271.1987.PMC 373105.PMID 2439888.
  6. ^abcdefghGupta, R.S. (1998)."Protein phylogenies and signature sequences: A reappraisal of evolutionary relationships among archaebacteria, eubacteria and eukaryotes".Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.62 (4):1435–1491.doi:10.1128/MMBR.62.4.1435-1491.1998.PMC 98952.PMID 9841678.
  7. ^abcGupta, R.S. (2000)."The natural evolutionary relationships among prokaryotes"(PDF).Critical Reviews in Microbiology.26 (2):111–131.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.496.1356.doi:10.1080/10408410091154219.PMID 10890353.S2CID 30541897.Archived(PDF) from the original on 2013-06-25.
  8. ^abDesvaux, M.; Hébraud, M.; Talon, R.; Henderson, I.R. (2009). "Secretion and subcellular localizations of bacterial proteins: A semantic awareness issue".Trends in Microbiology.17 (4):139–145.doi:10.1016/j.tim.2009.01.004.PMID 19299134.
  9. ^abSutcliffe, I.C. (2010). "A phylum level perspective on bacterial cell envelope architecture".Trends in Microbiology.18 (10):464–470.doi:10.1016/j.tim.2010.06.005.PMID 20637628.
  10. ^abcdeGupta, R.S. (1998). "What are archaebacteria: life's third domain or monoderm prokaryotes related to Gram-positive bacteria? A new proposal for the classification of prokaryotic organisms".Molecular Microbiology.29 (3):695–707.doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00978.x.PMID 9723910.S2CID 41206658.
  11. ^abcdefgGupta, R.S. (2011)."Origin of diderm (gram-negative) bacteria: antibiotic selection pressure rather than endosymbiosis likely led to the evolution of bacterial cells with two membranes".Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.100 (2):171–182.doi:10.1007/s10482-011-9616-8.PMC 3133647.PMID 21717204.
  12. ^abcMarchandin, H.; Teyssier, C.; Campos, J.; Jean-Pierre, H.; Roger, F.; Gay, B.; Carlier, J.-P.; Jumas-Bilak, E. (2009)."Negativicoccus succinicivorans gen. Nov., sp. Nov., isolated from human clinical samples, emended description of the family Veillonellaceae and description of Negativicutes classis nov., Selenomonadales ord. nov. and Acidaminococcaceae fam. nov. In the bacterial phylum Firmicutes".International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.60 (6):1271–1279.doi:10.1099/ijs.0.013102-0.PMID 19667386.
  13. ^Yabe, S.; Aiba, Y.; Sakai, Y.; Hazaka, M.; Yokota, A. (2010)."Thermogemmatispora onikobensis gen. nov., sp. nov. AndThermogemmatispora foliorum sp. nov., isolated from fallen leaves on geothermal soils, and description of Thermogemmatisporaceae fam. nov. and Thermogemmatisporales ord. Nov. Within the class Ktedonobacteria".International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.61 (4):903–910.doi:10.1099/ijs.0.024877-0.PMID 20495028.
  14. ^Sutcliffe, I.C. (2011). "Cell envelope architecture in the Chloroflexi: A shifting frontline in a phylogenetic turf war".Environmental Microbiology.13 (2):279–282.Bibcode:2011EnvMi..13..279S.doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02339.x.PMID 20860732.
  15. ^Hugenholtz, P.; Tyson, G.W.; Webb, R.I.; Wagner, A.M.; Blackall, L.L. (2001)."Investigation of Candidate Division TM7, a Recently Recognized Major Lineage of the Domain Bacteria with No Known Pure-Culture Representatives".Applied and Environmental Microbiology.67 (1):411–419.Bibcode:2001ApEnM..67..411H.doi:10.1128/AEM.67.1.411-419.2001.PMC 92593.PMID 11133473.
  16. ^Cavaletti, L.; Monciardini, P.; Bamonte, R.; Schumann, P.; Rohde, M.; Sosio, M.; Donadio, S. (2006)."New Lineage of Filamentous, Spore-Forming, Gram-Positive Bacteria from Soil".Applied and Environmental Microbiology.72 (6):4360–4369.Bibcode:2006ApEnM..72.4360C.doi:10.1128/AEM.00132-06.PMC 1489649.PMID 16751552.
  17. ^Gladwin, Mark; Trattler, Bill (2007).Clinical Microbiology Made Ridiculously Simple. Miami, FL: MedMaster. pp. 4–5.ISBN 978-0-940780-81-1.
  18. ^Sahebnasagh, R.; Saderi, H.; Owlia, P. (4–7 September 2011).Detection of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus strains from clinical samples in Tehran by detection of themecA andnuc genes. The First Iranian International Congress of Medical Bacteriology. Tabriz, Iran.
  19. ^MacDonald, Mhairi (2015).Avery's Neonatology: Pathophysiology and Management of the Newborn. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.ISBN 9781451192681. Access provided by the University of Pittsburgh.
  20. ^Lau, S.K.P.; McNabb, A.; Woo, G.K.S.; Hoang, L.; Fung, A.M.Y.; Chung, L.M.W.; Woo, P.C.Y.; Yuen, K.-Y. (22 November 2006)."Catabacter hongkongensis gen. nov., sp. nov., Isolated from Blood Cultures of Patients from Hong Kong and Canada".Journal of Clinical Microbiology.45 (2):395–401.doi:10.1128/jcm.01831-06.ISSN 0095-1137.PMC 1829005.PMID 17122022.
  21. ^abcJohnston, C.; Martin, B.; Fichant, G.; Polard, P; Claverys, J.P. (2014). "Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control".Nature Reviews. Microbiology.12 (3):181–196.doi:10.1038/nrmicro3199.PMID 24509783.S2CID 23559881.
  22. ^Korotetskiy I, Shilov S, Kuznetsova T, Kerimzhanova B, Korotetskaya N, Ivanova L, Zubenko N, Parenova R, Reva O (2023)."Analysis of Whole-Genome Sequences of Pathogenic Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Isolates from the Same Hospital Environment to Investigate Common Evolutionary Trends Associated with Horizontal Gene Exchange, Mutations and DNA Methylation Patterning".Microorganisms.11 (2): 323.doi:10.3390/microorganisms11020323.PMC 9961978.PMID 36838287.
  23. ^Michod, R.E.; Bernstein, H.; Nedelcu, A.M. (2008). "Adaptive value of sex in microbial pathogens".Infection, Genetics and Evolution.8 (3):267–285.Bibcode:2008InfGE...8..267M.doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2008.01.002.PMID 18295550.
  24. ^"Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal Style Guide".CDC.gov. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

External links

[edit]
Medical
microbiology
Biochemistry
andecology
Oxygen
preference
Other
Shape
Structure
Cell
envelope
Outside
envelope
Composite
Taxonomy
andevolution
Prokaryotes:Bacteria classification
Candidate Phyla
Radiation
  • "Elulimicrobiota"
    • "Elulimicrobia"
  • Minisyncoccota
    • "Absconditibacteria"
    • "Andersenbacteria"
    • "Berkelbacteria"
    • "Baikalibacteria"
    • "Dojkabacteriia"
    • "Doudnabacteria"
    • "Gracilibacteriia"
    • "Howlettbacteria"
    • "Katanibacteriia"
    • "Kazanbacteria"
    • "Microgenomatia"
    • Minisyncoccia
    • "Patescibacteriia"
    • "Saccharimonadia"
    • "Torokbacteria"
    • "Wirthbacteria"
"Synergistetes"
"Thermocalda"
"Cyanoprokaryota"
"Firmicutes"
  • Bacillota
  • Bacillota D
  • Bacillota E
    • "Fermentithermobacillia"
    • Sulfobacillia
    • Symbiobacteriia
    • Thermaerobacteria
  • Bacillota G
    • "Hydrogenisporia"
    • Limnochordia
  • "Clostridiota"
    • "Clostridiia"
    • "Thermoanaerobacteria"
    • Thermosediminibacteria
  • "Desulfotomaculota"
    • "Carboxydocellia"
    • "Carboxydothermia"
    • "Dehalobacteriia"
    • Desulfitobacteriia
    • Desulfotomaculia
    • "Moorellia"
    • Peptococcia
    • Syntrophomonadia
    • "Thermacetogeniia"
    • Thermincolia
  • "Halanaerobiaeota"
  • "Selenobacteria"
"Sphingobacteria"
"Planctobacteria"
"Proteobacteria"
Incertae sedis
Incertae sedis
GTDB 10-RS226;LTP_10_2024
Bacilli
Lactobacillales
(Cat-)
Streptococcus
α
optochin susceptible
optochin resistant
β
A
B
ungrouped
γ
Enterococcus
Bacillales
(Cat+)
Staphylococcus
Cg+
Cg-
Bacillus
Listeria
Clostridia
Clostridium (spore-forming)
motile:
nonmotile:
Clostridioides (spore-forming)
Finegoldia (non-spore forming)
Mollicutes
Mycoplasmataceae
Anaeroplasmatales
International
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gram-positive_bacteria&oldid=1328002502"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp