Distribution, separated by genus: Green –Welwitschia Blue –Gnetum Red –Ephedra Purple –Gnetum andEphedra
Gnetophyta (/nɛˈtɒfɪtə,ˈnɛtoʊfaɪtə/) is a division of plants (alternatively considered the subclassGnetidae or orderGnetales), grouped within thegymnosperms (which also includesconifers,cycads, andginkgos), that consists of some 70 species across the threerelictgenera:Gnetum (family Gnetaceae),Welwitschia (familyWelwitschiaceae), andEphedra (familyEphedraceae). The earliest unambiguous records of the group date to theJurassic, and they achieved their highest diversity during theEarly Cretaceous. The primary difference between gnetophytes and othergymnosperms is the presence ofvessel elements, a system of small tubes (xylem) that transport water within the plant, similar to those found inflowering plants. Because of this, gnetophytes were once thought to be the closest gymnosperm relatives to flowering plants, but more recent molecular studies have brought this hypothesis into question, with many recent phylogenies finding them to be nested within the conifers.
Though it is clear they are all related, the exact evolutionary inter-relationships between gnetophytes are unclear. Some classifications hold that all three genera should be placed in a singleorder (Gnetales), while other classifications say they should be distributed among three separate orders, each containing a single family and genus. Most morphological and molecular studies confirm that the generaGnetum andWelwitschia diverged from each other more recently than they did fromEphedra.[1][2][3][4][5]
Welwitschia mirabilis bearing male conesEphedra distachya (male cones)Ephedra distachya (female plant in bloom)Gnetum gnemon male strobiliGnetum gnemon female strobilusFemaleEphedra californica cone
Unlike most biological groupings, it is difficult to find many common characteristics between all of the members of the gnetophytes.[6] The twocommon characteristics most commonly used are the presence of envelopingbracts around both theovules andmicrosporangia as well as a micropylar projection of the outer membrane of the ovule that produces apollination droplet,[7] though these are highly specific compared to the similarities between most other plant divisions. L. M. Bowe refers to the gnetophyte genera as a "bizarre and enigmatic" trio[2] because the gnetophytes' specialization to their respective environments is so complete that they hardly resemble each other at all.Gnetum species are mostlywoody vines in tropical forests, though the best-known member of this group,Gnetum gnemon,[8] is a tree native to westernMalesia. The one remaining species ofWelwitschia,Welwitschia mirabilis, native only to the dry deserts ofNamibia andAngola, is a ground-hugging species with only two large strap-like leaves that grow continuously from the base throughout the plant's life.Ephedra species, known as "jointfirs" in the United States, have long slender branches which bear tiny scale-like leaves at their nodes. Infusions from these plants have been traditionally used as astimulant, butephedrine is acontrolled substance today in many places because of the risk of harmful or even fataloverdosing.
With just three well-defined genera within an entire division, there still is understandable difficulty in establishing an unambiguous interrelationship among them; in earlier times matters were even more difficult, with Pearson in the early 20th century discussing about theclass Gnetales, rather than the order.[9] G.H.M. Lawrence referred to them as an order, but remarked that the three families were distinct enough to deserve recognition as separate orders.[10] Foster & Gifford accepted this principle, and placed the three orders together in a common class for convenience, which they called Gnetopsida.[11] In general the evolutionary relationships among theseed plants still are unresolved, and the Gnetophyta have played an important role in the formation ofphylogenetic hypotheses. Molecular phylogenies of extant gymnosperms have conflicted with morphological characters with regard to whether the gymnosperms as a whole (including gnetophytes) comprise amonophyletic group or aparaphyletic one that gave rise to angiosperms. At issue is whether the Gnetophyta are thesister group of angiosperms, or whether they are sister to, or nested within, other extant gymnosperms. Numerous fossil gymnosperm clades once existed that are morphologically at least as distinctive as the four livinggymnosperm groups, such as Bennettitales,Caytonia and theglossopterids. When these gymnosperm fossils are considered, the question of gnetophyte relationships to other seed plants becomes even more complicated. Several hypotheses, illustrated below, have been presented to explain seed plant evolution. Some morphological studies have supported a close relationship between Gnetophyta,Bennettitales and theErdtmanithecales.[12]
Recent research by Lee, Cibrian-Jaramillo,et al. (2011) suggests that the Gnetophyta are a sister group to the rest of the gymnosperms,[13] contradicting the anthophyte hypothesis, which held that gnetophytes were sister to the flowering plants.
In the gnetifer hypothesis, the gnetophytes are sister to theconifers, and thegymnosperms are amonophyletic group, sister to the angiosperms.The gnetifer hypothesis first emerged formally in the mid-twentieth century, when vessel elements in the gnetophytes were interpreted as being derived fromtracheids with circular bordered pits, as in conifers.[7] It however only gained strong support with the emergence of molecular data in the late 1990s.[14][15][16][17] Although the most salient morphological evidence still largely supports the anthophyte hypothesis, some more obscure morphological commonalities between the gnetophytes and conifers lend support to the gnetifer hypothesis.These shared traits include:tracheids with scalariform pits with tori interspersed with annular thickenings, absence of scalariform pitting in primaryxylem, scale-like and strap-shapedleaves ofEphedra andWelwitschia; and reducedsporophylls.[18][19][20]
From the early twentieth century, the anthophyte hypothesis was the prevailing explanation forseed plant evolution, based on sharedmorphological characters between the gnetophytes and angiosperms. In this hypothesis, the gnetophytes, along with the extinct order Bennettitales, are sister to the angiosperms, forming the "anthophytes".[7] Some morphological characters that were suggested to unite the anthophytes include vessels in wood, net-veined leaves (inGnetum only),lignin chemistry, the layering of cells in the apicalmeristem,pollen andmegaspore features (including thin megaspore wall), short cambial initials, and lignin syringal groups.[7][21][22][23] However, most genetic studies, as well as more recent morphological analyses,[24] have rejected the anthophyte hypothesis.[2][14][15][18][19][25][26][27][28][29][excessive citations]
Several of these studies have suggested that the gnetophytes and angiosperms have independently derived characters, including flower-like reproductive structures and tracheid vessel elements, that appear shared but are actually the result of parallel evolution.[2][7][25]
The gnepine hypothesis is a modification of the gnetifer hypothesis, and suggests that the gnetophytes belong within the conifers as a sister group to thePinaceae.[7] According to this hypothesis, the conifers as currently defined are not a monophyletic group, in contrast with molecular findings that support its monophyly.[16] All existing evidence for this hypothesis comes from molecular studies since 1999.[2][3][25][27][18][15][19][20][30][31] A 2018 phylogenomic study estimated the divergence between Gnetales and Pinaceae at around 241 millions of years ago, in the earlyTriassic[30] while a 2021 study placed it earlier, in theCarboniferous.[31]
However, the morphological evidence remains difficult to reconcile with the gnepine hypothesis. If the gnetophytes are nested within conifers, they must have lost several shared derived characters of the conifers (or these characters must have evolved in parallel in the other two conifer lineages): narrowly triangular leaves (gnetophytes have diverse leaf shapes),resin canals, a tieredproembryo, and flat woody ovuliferouscone scales.[18] These kinds of major morphological changes are not without precedent in thePinales, however: theTaxaceae, for example, have lost the classical cone of the conifers in favor of a single-terminal ovule, surrounded by a fleshy aril.[25]
Some partitions of the genetic data suggest that the gnetophytes are sister to all of the other extant seed plant groups.[4][7][18][19][16][32][33] However, there is no morphological evidence nor examples from the fossil record to support the gnetophyte-sister hypotheses.[20]
Knowledge of gnetophyte history through fossil discovery has increased greatly since the 1980s.[1] Although some fossils that have been proposed to be gnetophytes have been found as far back as thePermian,[34] their affinities to the group are equivocal. The oldest fossils that are definitely assignable to the group date to the Late Jurassic.[35] Overall, the fossil record of the group is richest during theEarly Cretaceous, exhibiting a substantial decline during the Late Cretaceous.[35]
Siphonospermum Rydin et Friis, 2010[49] Yixian Formation, China, Early Cretaceous (Aptian)
Welwitschiophyllum Dilcher et al., 2005 Crato Formation, Brazil, Early Cretaceous (Aptian),Akrabou Formation, Morocco, Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian-Turonian) (Initially interpreted as a member of Welwitschiaceae, later considered uncertain).[50][51]
^abGugerli, F.; Sperisen, C.; Buchler, U.; Brunner, L.; Brodbeck, S.; Palmer, J.D.; Qiu, Y.L. (2001). "The evolutionary split of Pinaceae from other conifers: evidence from an intron loss and a multigene phylogeny".Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.21 (2):167–175.doi:10.1006/mpev.2001.1004.PMID11697913.
^abRai, H.S.; Reeves, P.A.; Peakall, R.; Olmstead, R.G.; Graham, S.W. (2008). "Inference of higher-order conifer relationships from a multi-locus plastid data set".Botany.86 (7):658–669.doi:10.1139/B08-062.
^Arber, E.A.N.; Parkin, J. (1908). "Studies on the evolution of the angiosperms: the relationship of the angiosperms to the Gnetales".Annals of Botany.22 (3):489–515.doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a089185.
^abcdefgJudd, W.S.; Campbell, C.S.; Kellogg, E.A.; Stevens, P.F.; and Donoghue, M.J. (2008) Plant Systematics: A Phylogenetics Approach. 3rd ed. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
^Wan T, Liu Z M, Li L F, et al. A genome for gnetophytes and early evolution of seed plants[J]. Nature plants, 2018, 4(2): 82.
^Pearson, H.H.W. (2010) [1929].Gnetales. Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-1108013987.
^Lawrence, George Hill Mathewson. Taxonomy of vascular plants. Macmillan, 1951
^Foster, Adriance S.; Gifford, Ernest M. Jr. (1974).Comparative Morphology of Vascular Plants. Freeman.ISBN0-7167-0712-8.
^Friis, Else Marie; Crane, Peter R.; Pedersen, Kaj Raunsgaard; Bengtson, Stefan; Donoghue, Philip C.J.; Grimm, Guido W.; Stampanoni, Marco (November 2007). "Phase-contrast X-ray microtomography links Cretaceous seeds with Gnetales and Bennettitales".Nature.450 (7169):549–552.Bibcode:2007Natur.450..549F.doi:10.1038/nature06278.ISSN0028-0836.PMID18033296.S2CID1198220.
^abcQiu, Y.L.; Lee, J.; Bernasconi-Quadroni, F.; Soltis, D.E.; Soltis, P.S.; Zanis, M.; Zimmer, E.A.; Chen, Z.; Savalainen, V. & Chase, M.W. (1999). "The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes".Nature.402 (6760):404–407.Bibcode:1999Natur.402..404Q.doi:10.1038/46536.PMID10586879.S2CID4380796.
^abcRydin, C.; Kallersjo, M.; Friist, E.M. (2002). "Seed plant relationships and the systematic position of Gnetales based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA: Conflicting data, rooting problems, and the monophyly of conifers".International Journal of Plant Sciences.163 (2):197–214.doi:10.1086/338321.JSTOR3080238.S2CID84578578.
^Coiro, M.; Chomicki, G.; Doyle, J.A. (2018). "Experimental signal dissection and method sensitivity analyses reaffirm the potential of fossils and morphology in the resolution of the relationship of angiosperms and Gnetales".Paleobiology.44 (3):490–510.Bibcode:2018Pbio...44..490C.doi:10.1017/pab.2018.23.S2CID91488394.
^abHajibabaei, M.; Xia, J.; Drouin, G. (2006). "Seed plant phylogeny: Gnetophytes are derived conifers and a sister group to Pinaceae".Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.40 (1):208–217.doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.006.PMID16621615.
^Samigullin, T.K.; Martin, W.F.; Troitsky, A.V.; Antonov, A.S. (1999). "Molecular data from the chloroplast rpoC1 gene suggest a deep and distinct dichotomy of contemporary spermatophytes into two monophyla: gymnosperms (including Gnetalaes) and angiosperms".Journal of Molecular Evolution.49 (3):310–315.Bibcode:1999JMolE..49..310S.doi:10.1007/PL00006553.PMID10473771.S2CID4232968.
^abStull, Gregory W.; Qu, Xiao-Jian; Parins-Fukuchi, Caroline; Yang, Ying-Ying; Yang, Jun-Bo; Yang, Zhi-Yun; Hu, Yi; Ma, Hong; Soltis, Pamela S.; Soltis, Douglas E.; Li, De-Zhu; Smith, Stephen A.; Yi, Ting-Shuang (2021). "Gene duplications and phylogenomic conflict underlie major pulses of phenotypic evolution in gymnosperms".Nature Plants.7 (8):1015–1025.doi:10.1038/s41477-021-00964-4.PMID34282286.S2CID236141481.
^Zhang, Y; Liu, Z. (7 May 2019). "Genic evidence that gnetophytes are sister to all other seed plants".bioRxiv (preprint). Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory.doi:10.1101/629915. bioRxiv 629915.
_1.jpg)
.jpg)
