| Glacialisaurus | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Holotype leg bones,Field Museum of Natural History | |
Scientific classification | |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Clade: | Dinosauria |
| Clade: | Saurischia |
| Clade: | †Sauropodomorpha |
| Family: | †Massospondylidae |
| Genus: | †Glacialisaurus Smith & Pol,2007 |
| Type species | |
| †Glacialisaurus hammeri Smith & Pol, 2007 | |
Glacialisaurus is agenus ofsauropodomorphdinosaur from theEarly Jurassicperiod ofAntarctica. It is known from two specimens; theholotype (name-bearing specimen), a partialtarsus (ankle) andmetatarsus, and a partial leftfemur (upper thigh bone). The fossils were collected by a team led by paleontologistWilliam R. Hammer during a 1990–91 field expedition to the central region of theTransantarctic Mountains. They come from sedimentary rocks of theHanson Formation and date to thePliensbachian stage of the Early Jurassic, around 186 to 182 million years ago.The fossils were described in 2007, and made the basis of the newgenus andspeciesGlacialisaurus hammeri. The genus name translates as “icy” or "frozen lizard”, and thespecific name honors Hammer.
This dinosaur has been classified as amassospondylid, a group of medium-sized,basal (early diverging or "primitive") sauropodomorphs that existed during theLate Triassic and Early Jurassic on every continent except Australia. Its length has been estimated at 6.2 m (20 ft).Glacialisaurus was a large herbivorous dinosaur, though it was average sized for a massospondylid.Glacialisaurus was distinct from other sauropodomorphs in features such as having a robust medial epicondylar ridge on the lower femur, a robust adductor ridge extending from the upper end of the femoral medial condyle, and a second metatarsal with a front border that is weakly convex in the upper end.
Fossils of asauropodomorph dinosaur were discovered by a field team fromAugustana College led by paleontologistWilliam R. Hammer during 1990–91 fieldwork in the lowerHanson Formation ofMount Kirkpatrick in theCentral Transantarctic Mountains ofAntarctica, dating to theEarly Jurassic.[1][2][3] The fossils were from two different individuals: elements of the right ankle andmetatarsus such as theastragalus, twotarsals and four metatarsals preserved in articulation (specimen FMNH PR1823), and the lower part of a leftfemur (FMNH PR1822, a thigh bone), ending just after the dissipation of the medial epicondylar crest.[3]
Several other fossils were collected from the same site, including fossils of the carnivoroustheropod dinosaurCryolophosaurus, apterosaur humerus (upper arm bone), and a large tooth of atritylodont,[4][2][1] all found at an elevation of about 4,100 m (13,500 ft).[3] The right ankle and tarsus were preserved in a 1 m (3.3 ft) thick layer ofstrata, while the femur was preserved at the surface weathering next to theCryolophosaurus specimen.[3][4] The fossils were sent to theField Museum of Natural History inChicago, USA, and were first reported in 1994.[2] This report speculated that cervical vertebrae fromCryolophosaurus found nearby also belonged to the sauropodomorph,[2] but this has since been disproven.[3]
The fossils were described by the paleontologists Nathan Smith and Diego Pol, who named the new genus and speciesGlacialisaurus hammeri, with FMNH PR1823 asholotype specimen. The generic name is derived from theLatin rootglacialis meaning'icy' after its discovery in theBeardmore Glacier region in the Central Transantarctic Mountains and the wordsauros meaning'lizard'.[3] Thespecific name honors Hammer for his contributions to Antarctic paleontology.[3]
While few remains are known ofGlacialisaurus, its leg bones show it was a robustbasal (early diverging or "primitive") sauropodomorph. The femur fragment is the larger of the two known specimens, measuring 300 mm (0.98 ft) as preserved, with an estimated total length when intact of 600 mm (2.0 ft).[3]Glacialisaurus is estimated to have been about 6.2 m (20 ft) long.[5] As a basal sauropodomorph,Glacialisaurus would have had a long neck and a proportionally small head with leaf-shaped teeth. The hand would have been short, wide, and robust with a large claw on the thumb.[6]
Thecross-section of the robustfemoral shaft is slightly wider from side to side than from front to back, though not as extreme as ineusauropods. The medial epicondylar crest extends from the medial surface of the lower femoral shaft and is distinct from all other sauropodomorphs in that it is robust, a traitconvergently evolved in basal theropods. The front surface of the femur is flat instead of convex from side to side, a feature shared with other basal sauropodomorphs. The top surface of the upper femur lacks any anterior extensor groove. At the lower end, the lateral and medial condyles are separated by a craniocaudal groove that ends abruptly with a popliteal fossa (opening in the bone).Glacialisaurus is distinguished by its robust adductor ridge extending from the upper end of the femoral medial condyle. This ridge starts at the end of the medial condyle and is kidney-shaped with a long axis spanning proximolateral−distomedially.[3]
The astragalus is low and elongate from across side to side and the medial portion lacks the craniocaudally broadening compared to the lateral portion, a trait found in most non-eusauropods. The astragalus is weakly convex at the lower end, though this is not as extreme as inBlikanasaurus andLessemsaurus. The upper surface of the astragalus is softly convex because it is where the lower end of thetibia (shin bone) articulates with the astragalus. This surface is pierced by two foramina (small openings in bone) that have been interpreted asvascular foramina. The ascending process (protrusion of bone) is mound shaped and its upper articular surface faces proximomedially. The distal tarsals have a laterally elongated triangular shape in when seen from their top ends. The corners of the tarsals are rounded and bulbous, especially in the posteromedial corner. The medial distal tarsal is not confined solely to metatarsal III, but also barely contacts the proximal end of metatarsal II, like inSaturnalia. The lateral distal tarsal has a quadrangular shape and was likely longer mediolaterally than proximodistally.[3]
Metatarsal I is roughly 3/4 the length of metatarsal II, as in most basal sauropodomorphs. Metatarsal I has a broad and short shaft that is ellipse shaped, more so than in most other basal sauropodomorphs. The upper portion of the small posterior groove separating the two distalcondyles is similar to that ofPlateosaurus. The medial condyle is less robust and more proximally positioned than the lateral one. This would cause a medial displacement of the first digit, a characteristic in mostsaurischian dinosaurs (the group that includes sauropodomorphs and theropods). The upper end of metatarsal II is hourglass-shaped and has concave medial-lateral ends to articulate with the other metatarsals. The medial concavity is well developed, but the lateral concavity is less so.[3]
The diagnostic traits (characteristics that distinguish a taxon from others) of the second metatarsals include: a front border that is weakly convex in proximal aspect; a hypertrophied lateral plantar flange on the proximal end (present, but less developed in many basal sauropodomorphs, e.g.,Saturnalia,Plateosaurus); and a medial distal condyle that is more robust and well−developed than the lateral distal condyle. The third metatarsal lacks much preserved detail, but has a trapezoidal upper end with a straight to concave front border and a slightly convex medial border for articulation with metatarsal II. The hind edge is narrower from side toside than the front one, but is not acute or rounded, causing the upper outline of metatarsal III to be almost trapezoidal, as inLufengosaurus,Gyposaurus, andColoradisaurus. On the contrary, most non-eusauropod sauropodomorphs have almost triangular upper outlines. Only the upper portion of the metatarsal IV is preserved, but preserves an upper outline akin to that ofLufengosaurus that has a broad anterior face and a finger−like posteromedial projection. This finger-like process is slightly convex and would have articulated with metatarsal III.[3]
Thephylogenetic position ofGlacialisaurus is unstable due to its fragmentary nature, but it is frequently found to be a member of the familyMassospondylidae.[7][8][9][10][11][3] Massospondylids are a group of non-eusauropod sauropodomorphs that existed during theLate Triassic to Early Jurassic in Africa, Antarctica, Asia, and the Americas.[3] Massospondylids have been recovered as thesister group (most closely related group) to more derived sauropodomorphs, includingSauropoda itself, and are more derived than groups like Plateosauridae.[9][3] In their 2007 phylogenetic analysis of the relationships ofGlacialisaurus, Smith and Pol found that it was a massospondylid.[3] Features of its foot are similar toLufengosaurus (from the Early Jurassic of China), and the phylogenetic study suggested that these dinosaurs were close relatives, whereasMassospondylus was found to be a more basal form.[3] This has been supported by later analyses,[12][8][9][10][7] including Müller (2019) which found it in a clade withColoradisaurus andLufengosaurus, whileMassospondylus,Sarahsaurus,Pradhania, andXingxiulong were more basal in the family.[11]
The paleontologist Oliver W. M. Rauhut and colleagues foundLufengosaurus to bemost closely related toGlacialisaurus in 2020, and the followingcladogram shows the placement they recovered forGlacialisaurus within the sauropodomorph groupMassopoda:[10]
The discovery ofGlacialisaurus is important to the study of the early distribution of sauropod dinosaurs.[3] The presence of this primitive sauropodomorph in the Hanson Formation (which has also yielded remains attributed to true sauropods) shows that both primitive and advanced members of this lineage existed side by side in the early Jurassic Period.[13][3]
Glacialisaurus is known from the Hanson Formation, which is one of only two major dinosaur-bearing rock formations found on Antarctica. The specimens were discovered intuffaceoussiltstone deposited in the Sinemurian to Pliensbachian stage of the Early Jurassic,[2][14] dating to about 194–188 million years ago.[3][15] Thisgeological formation is part of the Victoria Group of the Transantarctic Mountains, which is approximately 4,000 m (13,000 ft) above sea level.[14] The high altitude of this site supports the idea that early Jurassic Antarctica hadforests populated by a diverse range of species, at least along the coast.[16] The Hanson Formation was deposited in an active volcano−tectonic rift system formed during the breakup of thesupercontinentGondwana.[15] Local volcanism and evidence of wildfires is known from some paleobotanical sites in the Hanson Formation.[17]
Models of Jurassic air flow indicate that coastal areas probably never dropped much below freezing, although more extreme conditions existed inland.[18]Glacialisaurus was found about 650 kilometres (400 mi) from theSouth Pole,[14] which was about 1,000 km (621 mi) or so farther north at the time.[16] This formation has yielded the remains of the large theropodCryolophosaurus, a crow-sizeddimorphodontid pterosaur, a rat-sizedtritylodontsynapsid, and two small unnamed sauropodomorphs.[15][3][4] Many plant genera have also been recovered from the Shafer Peak section of the Hanson Formation that suggest forests similar to the open woodlands ofNorth Island, New Zealand.[17] Known plants includeCheirolepidiaceaen conifers,Equisetites horsetails, andCladophlebis ferns that have also been found or are similar to plants found in other Early Jurassic sites that represent warm climates.[19][20][17] Basal sauropodomorphs likeGlacialisaurus were the first very large dinosaurs and, due to their height, the first herbivores to high browse.[6][21]
