The Earl of Cromartie | |
|---|---|
 The 1st Earl of Cromartie | |
| Secretary of Scotland | |
| In office 21 November 1702 – 17 October 1704 | |
| Monarch | Queen Anne |
| Preceded by | The Duke of Queensberry |
| Succeeded by | The Earl of Roxburghe |
| Personal details | |
| Born | 1630 |
| Died | 17 August 1714 (aged 84) Tarbat House,Ross-shire, Scotland |
| Alma mater | University of St Andrews University of Aberdeen |
George Mackenzie, 1st Earl of CromartieFRS (1630–1714), known asSir George Mackenzie, 2nd Baronet from 1654 to 1685 and as theViscount of Tarbat from 1685 to 1703, was aScottish statesman.
He was born at Innerteil, nearKinghorn,Fife, in 1630, was eldest son of Sir John Mackenzie of Tarbat – grandson of Sir Roderick MacKenzie and great-grandson ofColin Mackenzie of Kintail, and nephew of the first Lord Mackenzie of Kintail, Ross-shire, the progenitor of the Mackenzies,earls of Seaforth. His mother was Margaret, daughter of Sir George Erskine of Innerteil, lord Innerteil, alord of the court of session.[1]
He was educated at theSt Andrews University andKing's College, Aberdeen, where he graduated in 1646. He became an accomplished classical scholar, and cultivated interests in literature and science, but politics was his chief interest. In 1653, he joined Glencairn's uprising on behalf of Charles II, and on the defeat ofJohn Middleton, 1st Earl of Middleton, on 26 July 1654, fled to the castle ofEilean Donan. He succeeded to the family estates on his father's death on 10 September 1654, but after escaping to the continent, remained in exile until the Restoration, occupying much of his leisure in the study of law.[1]
On the Restoration of Charles II in 1660, Middleton, Mackenzie's old commander, had the management of Scottish affairs, and Mackenzie was his chief confidant.
His relative, SirGeorge Mackenzie, describes him as at this time "a passionatecavalier" but keen ambition influenced his political conduct as much as passion or prejudice.[1]
On 14 February 1661, he was nominated aLord of Session with the judicial title of Lord Tarbat, and was elected the same year a member of the estates forthe shire of Ross.
He is credited by Sir George Mackenzie with being the chief originator of the act passed in 1661 rescinding all statutes passed in the Parliament of 1640 and subsequently, but the chief aim of the act was to prepare for the establishment of episcopacy. It was not likely suggested to Tarbat byArchbishop Sharp.[1]
In their policy on behalf of episcopacy, Middleton and Tarbat found themselves at this time opposed byJohn Maitland, 1st Duke of Lauderdale, the Minister for Scottish Affairs. They resolved therefore, to ruin him, the design being that Tarbat, who 'was then much considered at court, as one of the most extraordinary men that Scotland had produced', should succeed to Lauderdale's place as Secretary of State. To this end, in 1662, they devised the famous 'act of billeting,' the credit of which probably belongs to Tarbat. The proposal was by a secret vote of the estates to declare certain persons incapable of holding any office of public trust; but when the result of the vote – which disqualified Lauderdale among others – was sent up to the king he 'threw the act of billeting into his cabinet, declaring that he would not follow their advice nor would he disclose their secret'. Further inquiry, instigated by Lauderdale, led to the discovery that Middleton had been misleading both the king and the parliament, and he was dismissed from office, while Tarbat, for his connection with the intrigue, was on 16 February 1664 deprived of his seat on the bench.[1]
He remained in disgrace till 1678, when, through the offices of Sharp with the Duke and Duchess of Lauderdale, he was on 16 October appointedLord Justice General of Scotland. On the following day he received a pension of £200 fromCharles II, and on November was admitted aprivy councillor of Scotland. The day after his admission he presented a letter from the king, to be recorded in the books of sederunt, intimating the king's pardon for his connection with the act of billeting. On 1 October 1681, he was appointedLord Clerk Register, and on 11 November following was again admitted one of the ordinary lords of session.[1]
On the fall of Lauderdale in 1682, Tarbat succeeded to the position of chief minister of the king in Scotland, and retained this position till theRevolution. In 1683 he bought an estate north of Edinburgh belonging to Andrew Logan and builtRoyston House (later renamed Caroline Park), which in 1705 he unsuccessfully tried to sell to the government as an official residence for the Lord Chancellor.[2] Shortly after the accession ofJames II, he was on 15 February 1685 created Viscount of Tarbat and Lord Macleod and Castlehaven in the peerage of Scotland to him and heirs male of his body.[1]
At the Revolution Tarbat, so soon as he discerned that the cause of James was lost, resolved if possible to secure his own safety and his continuance in power. By advising in council the disbanding of the militia, he greatly facilitated the peaceful establishment of the new government. In the 'Leven and Melville Papers' (p. 14) there is printed, under date 25 April 1689, an exoneration and discharge to him of his office of register, securing him – on account of his faithful service both in putting 'in order and method' the various documents under his charge and recovering many that were missing — 'from all danger in his person or estate, notwithstanding of any acts, writings, councils, speeches, or any crimes committed by him.' It would appear, however, that he was not finally exonerated until after 17 January 1690.[1]
In 1689, he sent a memorial to the government, proposing a joint recognition of presbytery and episcopacy. AfterKilliecrankie he was employed by the government to treat with the Highland clans. He thoroughly understood Highland politics, and his prudent counsel was of considerable advantage in bringing about a settlement. If, says Macaulay, his plan (of distributing a few thousands sterling among the Highland chiefs) had been tried when he recommended it, instead of two years later, 'it would probably have prevented much bloodshed and confusion'. On 5 March 1692, he was restored to the office of clerk register, but resigned it towards the close of 1695. According to Secretary Johnstone, he had been caught 'grossly malversizing in his office of clerk both in public and in private business'.[1]
On 3rd April 1696, Tarbat was elected to the court of directors of theCompany of Scotland trading to Africa and the Indies.[3]
On the accession ofQueen Anne, Tarbat was on 21 November 1702 appointed one of theSecretaries of State, and on 1 January 1703, was createdEarl of Cromarty. Subsequently, he was chosen as aScottish representative peer. In 1704, he resigned the office of secretary, and on 26 June 1705 was made lord justice general, retaining office till 1710.[1]
Lockhart states that though 'he pretended to favour the Royal Family [the family in exile] and the episcopal clergy, yet he never did one act in favour of any of them, excepting that when he was secretary to Queen Anne he procured an Act of Indemnity and a letter from her recommending the episcopal clergy to the Privy Council's protection; but whether this proceeded from a desire and design of serving them is easy to determine when we consider that no sooner did Queen Anne desert the Tory party and maxims, but his Lordship turned as great a Whig as the best of them, joined with Tweedale's party to advance the Hanoverian succession in the Parliament 1704, and was at last a zealous stickler and writer in favour of the Union'. Cromarty's able and judicious advocacy of theunion with England is, however, his chief title to honour as a statesman, and atones for much that was foolish and inconsistent in his career.[1]
He died atNew Tarbat 17 August 1714, and was buried, not as he had directed beside his second wife at Wemyss, but beside his ancestors at Dingwall.[1]
By his first wife, Anna, daughter of Sir James Sinclair of Mey, baronet, he had four sons : Roderick, who died young; John, who succeeded his father; Kenneth, and James.[1] James had a daughter who married to become the eccentric LadyAnne Dick.[4] James later adopted the title Lord Royston.
By his second wife, Margaret, countess of Wemyss, he had no issue.[1]
Cromarty retained through life varied interests outside politics. He was consulted by SirRobert Moray in regard to the formation of theRoyal Society of London, and contributed to its 'Transactions' the following papers:
An 'Account of Hirta and Rona' (islands of the Hebrides) was published in 'Miscellanea Scotica,' 1818, ii. 79. He published a large number of political pamphlets, some of which are now rare. They include:
His other works are:
His 'Vindication of the Reformation of the Church of Scotland, with some Account of the Records,' was printed in theScots Magazine for 1802 from a manuscript in the possession of Constable, the publisher. A 'History of the Family of Mackenzie,' by Sir George Mackenzie, first earl of Cromarty, is printed in Fraser'sEarls of Cromartie, ii. 462-573.[1]
A letter he wrote toRobert Boyle is included inRobert Kirk'sThe Secret Commonwealth (1692).
We call them Sassanich, in Latin Saxi or Saxoni.
Attribution:
This article incorporates text from a publication now in thepublic domain: Henderson, Thomas Finlayson (1891). "Mackenzie, George (1630-1714)". InStephen, Leslie;Lee, Sidney (eds.).Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 25. London: Smith, Elder & Co.| Legal offices | ||
|---|---|---|
| Preceded by SirArchibald Primrose of Carrington | Lord Justice General 1678–1680 | Succeeded by |
| Preceded by | Lord Justice General 1704–1710 | Succeeded by |
| Political offices | ||
| Preceded by | Secretary of State 1702–1704 | Succeeded by |
| Peerage of Scotland | ||
| New creation | Earl of Cromartie 1703–1714 | Succeeded by |
| Viscount of Tarbat 1685–1714 | ||
| Baronetage of Nova Scotia | ||
| Preceded by John Mackenzie | Baronet (of Tarbat) 1654–1704 | Resigned |
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Academics | |
| People | |
| Other | |
