Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Generalized Riemann hypothesis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematical conjecture about zeros of L-functions

TheRiemann hypothesis is one of the most importantconjectures inmathematics. It is a statement about the zeros of theRiemann zeta function. Various geometrical and arithmetical objects can be described by so-called globalL-functions, which are formally similar to the Riemann zeta-function. One can then ask the same question about the zeros of theseL-functions, yielding various generalizations of the Riemann hypothesis. Many mathematicians believe these generalizations of the Riemann hypothesis to be true. The only cases of these conjectures which have been proven occur in thealgebraic function field case (not the number field case).

GlobalL-functions can be associated toelliptic curves,number fields (in which case they are calledDedekind zeta-functions),Maass forms, andDirichlet characters (in which case they are calledDirichletL-functions). When the Riemann hypothesis is formulated for Dedekind zeta-functions, it is known as theextended Riemann hypothesis (ERH) and when it is formulated for DirichletL-functions, it is known as thegeneralised Riemann hypothesis (GRH). Another approach to generalization of Riemann hypothesis was given byAtle Selberg and his introduction of class of function satisfying certain properties rather than specific functions, nowadays known as Selberg class. These three statements will be discussed in more detail below. (Many mathematicians use the labelgeneralized Riemann hypothesis to cover the extension of the Riemann hypothesis to all globalL-functions, not only the special case of DirichletL-functions.)

Generalized Riemann hypothesis (GRH)

[edit]
Main article:Dirichlet L-function

Generalized Riemann hypothesis asserts that all nontrivial zeros of DirichletL-functionL(χ,s){\textstyle L(\chi ,s)} for primitive Dirichlet characterχ{\displaystyle \chi } have real part12{\textstyle {\frac {1}{2}}}.

The generalized Riemann hypothesis for DirichletL-functions was probably formulated for the first time byAdolf Piltz in 1884.[1]It is important to assume primitivity of character since for nonprimitive charactersL-functions have infinitely many zeros off this line and don't satisfy functional equation that is used to distinguish between trivial and nontrivial zeros.

Background

[edit]

ADirichlet characterχ:ZC{\textstyle \chi :\mathbb {Z} \rightarrow \mathbb {C} } of modulusq isarithmetic function that is:

If such characterχ{\textstyle \chi }, we define the corresponding DirichletL-function by:

L(χ,s)=n=1χ(n)ns{\displaystyle L(\chi ,s)=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {\chi (n)}{n^{s}}}}

For everycomplex numbers such thatRes > 1 this series is absolutely convergent. Byanalytic continuation, this function can be extended tomeromorphic function on complex plane having only possible pole ins=1{\textstyle s=1}, when character is principal (have only 1 as value for numbers coprime tok). For nonprincipal character, series is conditionally convergent forRe(s)>0{\textstyle \operatorname {Re} (s)>0} and analytic continuation isentire function.

We say that Dirichlet characterχ{\textstyle \chi } isinprimitive if it is induced by another Dirichletχ{\textstyle \chi ^{\star }} character of lesser modulus:

χ(n)={χ(n),ifgcd(n,q)=10,ifgcd(n,q)1{\displaystyle \chi (n)={\begin{cases}\chi ^{\star }(n),&\mathrm {if} \gcd(n,q)=1\\0,&\mathrm {if} \gcd(n,q)\neq 1\end{cases}}}

Otherwise we say that character isprimitive. Generally most statements for Dirichlet L-functions are easier to express for versions with primitive characters. Using Euler product of Dirichlet L-functions we can express L-function of imprimitive characterχ{\textstyle \chi } by function of characterχ{\textstyle \chi ^{\star }} that induces it:

L(s,χ)=L(s,χ)p|q(1χ(p)ps){\displaystyle L(s,\chi )=L(s,\chi ^{\star })\prod _{p\,|\,q}\left(1-{\frac {\chi ^{\star }(p)}{p^{s}}}\right)}

From factors in this equation we have infinitely many zeros on line:Re(s)=0{\textstyle \operatorname {Re} (s)=0}.For primitive Dirichlet character L-function satisfies certainfunctional equation which allows us to definetrivial zeros ofL(s,χ){\textstyle L(s,\chi )} as zeros corresponding to poles of gamma function in this equation:

Any other zeros are callednontrivial zeros. Functional equation guarantees that nontrivial zeros lies in critical strip:0<Re(s)<1{\textstyle 0<\operatorname {Re} (s)<1} and are symmetric with respect to critical lineRe(s)=12{\textstyle \operatorname {Re} (s)={\tfrac {1}{2}}}. Generalized Riemann Hypothesis says that all nontrivial zeros lies exactly on this line.

Consequences of GRH

[edit]

Like the original Riemann hypothesis, GRH has far-reaching consequences about the distribution ofprime numbers:

π(x,a,d)=1φ(d)2x1lntdt+O(x1/2+ε) as  x,{\displaystyle \pi (x,a,d)={\frac {1}{\varphi (d)}}\int _{2}^{x}{\frac {1}{\ln t}}\,dt+O(x^{1/2+\varepsilon })\quad {\mbox{ as }}\ x\to \infty ,}
whereφ{\displaystyle \varphi } isEuler's totient function andO{\displaystyle O} is theBig O notation. This is a considerable strengthening of theprime number theorem.

Extended Riemann hypothesis (ERH)

[edit]

SupposeK{\textstyle K} is anumber field withring of integersOK{\textstyle O_{K}} (this ring is theintegral closure of theintegersZ{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } inK). IfI{\textstyle I} is a nonzeroideal ofOK{\textstyle O_{K}}, we denote itsnorm byN(I){\textstyle N(I)}. TheDedekind zeta-function ofK is then defined by:

ζK(s)=IOK1N(I)s{\displaystyle \zeta _{K}(s)=\sum _{I\subseteq O_{K}}{\frac {1}{N(I)^{s}}}}

for every complex numbers with real part > 1. The sum extends over all non-zero idealsI{\textstyle I} ofOK{\textstyle O_{K}}. That function can be extended by analytic continuation to the meromorphic function on complex plane with only possible pole ats=1{\textstyle s=1} and satisfies a functional equation that gives exact location of trivial zeroes and guarantees that nontrivial zeros lie inside critical strip0Re(s)1{\textstyle 0\leq \operatorname {Re} (s)\leq 1} and are symmetric with respect to critical line:Re(s)=12{\textstyle \operatorname {Re} (s)={\tfrac {1}{2}}}.

Theextended Riemann hypothesis asserts that for every number fieldK each nontrivial zero ofζK{\textstyle \zeta _{K}} has real part12{\textstyle {\tfrac {1}{2}}} (and thus lies on the critical line).

Consequences of ERH

[edit]
|C||G|(Li(x)+O(x(nlogx+log|Δ|))),{\displaystyle {\frac {|C|}{|G|}}{\Bigl (}\operatorname {Li} (x)+O{\bigl (}{\sqrt {x}}(n\log x+\log |\Delta |){\bigr )}{\Bigr )},}
where the constant implied in the big-O notation is absolute,n is the degree ofL overQ, and Δ its discriminant.
  • Weinberger (1973) showed that ERH implies that any number field with class number 1 is eitherEuclidean or an imaginary quadratic number field ofdiscriminant −19, −43, −67, or −163.
  • Odlyzko (1990) discussed how the ERH can be used to give sharper estimates for discriminants and class numbers of number fields.

Generalized Riemann hypothesis for Selberg class

[edit]

Selberg class is defined the following way:

We say that Dirichlet seriesF(s)=n=1anns{\textstyle F(s)=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{n^{s}}}} is in Selberg class if it satisfies following properties:

γ(s)=Qsi=1kΓ(ωis+μi){\displaystyle \gamma (s)=Q^{s}\prod _{i=1}^{k}\Gamma (\omega _{i}s+\mu _{i})}

whereQ{\textstyle Q} is real and positive,Γ{\textstyle \Gamma } thegamma function, theωi{\textstyle \omega _{i}} real and positive, and theμi{\textstyle \mu _{i}} complex with non-negative real part, as well as a so-called root number:αC,|α|=1{\textstyle \alpha \in \mathbb {C} ,\;|\alpha |=1}, such that the function:

Φ(s)=γ(s)F(s){\displaystyle \Phi (s)=\gamma (s)F(s)\,}

satisfies:

Φ(s)=αΦ(1s¯)¯;{\displaystyle \Phi (s)=\alpha \,{\overline {\Phi (1-{\overline {s}})}};}
  • Euler product: ForRe(s) > 1,F(s) can be written as a product over primes:
F(s)=pFp(s){\displaystyle F(s)=\prod _{p}F_{p}(s)}

with

Fp(s)=exp(n=1bpnpns){\displaystyle F_{p}(s)=\exp \left(\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {b_{p^{n}}}{p^{ns}}}\right)}

and, for someθ<12{\textstyle \theta <{\tfrac {1}{2}}},

bpn=O(pnθ).{\displaystyle b_{p^{n}}=O(p^{n\theta }).}

From analyticity follows that poles of gamma factor inRe(s)<1{\textstyle \operatorname {Re} (s)<1} must be cancelled by zeros ofF(s){\textstyle F(s)}, that zeros are called trivial zeros. Functional equation guarantees that all nontrivial zeros lie in critical strip0<Re(s)<1{\textstyle 0<\operatorname {Re} (s)<1} and are symmetric with respect to critical lineRe(s)=12{\textstyle \operatorname {Re} (s)={\tfrac {1}{2}}}.

Generalized Riemann hypothesis for Selberg class states that all nontrivial zeros of functionF{\textstyle F} belonging to Selberg class have real part12{\textstyle {\tfrac {1}{2}}} and then lie on critical line.

Selberg class along with proposition of Riemann hypothesis for it was firs introduced in (Selberg 1992). Instead of considering specific functions, Selberg approach was to give axiomatic definition consisting of properties characterizing most of objects calledL-functions orzeta functions and expected to satisfy counterparts or generalizations of Riemann hypothesis.

Consequences

[edit]
  • ArtinL-functions and Dedekind zeta functions belong to Selberg class, then Riemann Hypothesis for Selberg class implies extended Riemann hypothesis.
  • Nontrivial zeros for much more generalL-functions than Dedekind zeta functions lie on critical lines. One example can beRamanujanL-function related to modular form calledDedekind eta function. Despite Ramanujan L-function itself don't belong to Selberg class and its critical line isRe(s)=6{\displaystyle \operatorname {Re} (s)=6}, function obtained by translation of112{\displaystyle {\tfrac {11}{2}}} is in Selberg class.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Davenport, Harold (2000).Multiplicative Number Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 74. Revised and with a preface byHugh L. Montgomery (Third ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag. p. 124.ISBN 0-387-95097-4.
  2. ^Bach, Eric (1990)."Explicit bounds for primality testing and related problems".Mathematics of Computation.55 (191):355–380.doi:10.2307/2008811.JSTOR 2008811.
  3. ^Ivanyos, Gabor; Karpinski, Marek; Saxena, Nitin (2009). "Schemes for deterministic polynomial factoring".Proceedings of the 2009 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation (ISAAC). pp. 191–198.arXiv:0804.1974.doi:10.1145/1576702.1576730.ISBN 9781605586090.S2CID 15895636.
  4. ^Shoup, Victor (1992)."Searching for primitive roots in finite fields".Mathematics of Computation.58 (197):369–380.doi:10.2307/2153041.JSTOR 2153041.
  5. ^p5.Helfgott, Harald (2013). "Major arcs for Goldbach's theorem".arXiv:1305.2897 [math.NT].
  6. ^"Caltech Mathematicians Solve 19th Century Number Riddle".California Institute of Technology. October 31, 2022.
  7. ^Dunn, Alexander;Radziwiłł, Maksym (2021). "Bias in cubic Gauss sums: Patterson's conjecture".arXiv:2109.07463 [math.NT].
  8. ^Lagarias, J.C.; Odlyzko, A.M. (1977). "Effective Versions of the Chebotarev Theorem".Algebraic Number Fields:409–464.

Further reading

[edit]
Analytic examples
Algebraic examples
Theorems
Analytic conjectures
Algebraic conjectures
p-adicL-functions
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Generalized_Riemann_hypothesis&oldid=1336627646"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp