This article or sectionpossibly contains originalsynthesis. Source material shouldverifiably mention andrelate to the main topic. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page.(August 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |

In some North American sports, the phrasegames behind orgames back (often abbreviatedGB) refers to a common way to reflect the gap between a leading team and another team in a sports league, conference, or division.
In thestandings below from the1994 Major League Baseball season, theAtlanta Braves are sixgames behind theMontreal Expos. Atlanta would have to win six games, and Montreal would have to lose six games, to tie for first. The leading team is by definition zero games behind itself, and this is indicated in the standings with a dash, not a zero.
|
Games behind is calculated by using either of the following formulas, in which Team A is a leading team, and Team B is a trailing team. Example math in this section uses the above standings, with Montreal as Team A and Atlanta as Team B.
Alternately:
Notes:
A games behind calculation can be misleading when attempting to compare teams that have played an unequal number of games. This is because the games behind calculation simply computes the difference between wins and losses for each team, and then averages those two numbers. Essentially, this treats each unplayed game as being a tie (i.e.1⁄2 win and a1⁄2 loss).
In reality, teams in an actual sports league can have an unequal number of games played due to various scheduling anomalies, postponements, or cancellations. This can result in:
Such conditions have occurred multiple times in major sports leagues, examples include:
| Date | League and Division | Teams | W–L | Win Pct. | GB | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 11, 1901 | NL | New York Giants | 19–14 | .576 | 1⁄2 | [5] |
| Pittsburgh Pirates | 23–17 | .575 | — | |||
| April 22, 1913 | NL | Philadelphia Phillies | 4–1 | .800 | 1 | [6] |
| Pittsburgh Pirates | 7–2 | .778 | — | |||
| May 27, 1940 | NL | Brooklyn Dodgers | 20–8 | .714 | 1⁄2 | [7] |
| Cincinnati Reds | 22–9 | .710 | — | |||
| April 27, 1972 | AL West | Minnesota Twins | 5–2 | .714 | 1⁄2 | [8] |
| Chicago White Sox | 7–3 | .700 | — | |||
| April 13, 1983 | NL East | St. Louis Cardinals | 3–1 | .750 | 1⁄2 | [9] |
| Pittsburgh Pirates | 5–2 | .714 | — | |||
| April 24, 1983 | AL West | Kansas City Royals | 8–5 | .615 | 1⁄2 | [10] |
| California Angels | 11–7 | .611 | — | |||
| May 15, 1992 | AL East | Baltimore Orioles | 23–11 | .676 | 1⁄2 | [11] |
| Toronto Blue Jays | 25–12 | .676 | — | |||
| May 17, 2018 | AL East | New York Yankees | 28–13 | .683 | 1⁄2 | [12] |
| Boston Red Sox | 30–14 | .682 | — | |||
| August 24, 2020 | AL East | New York Yankees | 16–9 | .640 | 1⁄2 | [13] |
| Tampa Bay Rays | 19–11 | .633 | — |
| Date | Conference or Division | Teams | W–L | Win Pct. | GB | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 20, 1949 | Central Division | Rochester Royals | 14–8 | .636 | 1⁄2 | [14] |
| Chicago Stags | 17–10 | .630 | — | |||
| December 28, 1983 | Pacific Division | Los Angeles Lakers | 19–9 | .679 | 1⁄2 | [15] |
| Portland Trail Blazers | 21–10 | .677 | — | |||
| December 28, 2018 | Eastern Conference | Milwaukee Bucks | 24–10 | .706 | 1⁄2 | [16] |
| Toronto Raptors | 26–11 | .703 | — | |||
| December 27, 2023 | Western Conference | Oklahoma City Thunder | 20–9 | .690 | 1⁄2 | [17] |
| Denver Nuggets | 22–10 | .688 | — | |||
| January 4, 2024 | Western Conference | Oklahoma City Thunder | 23–10 | .697 | 1⁄2 | [18] |
| Denver Nuggets | 25–11 | .694 | — | |||
| January 28, 2024 | Western Conference | Los Angeles Clippers | 30–14 | .682 | 1⁄2 | [19] |
| Denver Nuggets | 32–15 | .681 | — | |||
| January 31, 2024 | Western Conference | Los Angeles Clippers | 31–15 | .674 | 1⁄2 | [20] |
| Denver Nuggets | 33–16 | .673 | — | |||
| November 6, 2024 | Eastern Conference | Detroit Pistons | 3–6 | .333 | 1⁄2 | [21] |
| Orlando Magic | 3–6 | .333 | 1⁄2 | |||
| Washington Wizards | 2–4 | .333 | — | |||
| January 13, 2025 | Eastern Conference | Toronto Raptors | 9–31 | .225 | 1 | [22] |
| Charlotte Hornets | 8–28 | .222 | — | |||
| January 17, 2025 | Western Conference | New Orleans Pelicans | 11–32 | .256 | 1⁄2 | [23] |
| Utah Jazz | 10–30 | .250 | — | |||
| November 15, 2025 | Western Conference | Houston Rockets | 8–3 | .727 | 1⁄2 | [24] |
| Los Angeles Lakers | 10–4 | .714 | — |
Leagues generally use winning percentage to order teams in official standings. However, standings appearing in newspapers or online may order teams based on games behind.

The games behind calculation is often used in professionalbaseball andbasketball, where tie games are not permitted.[a]Standings for these sports appearing in print or online during a season usually will have teams ordered by winning percentages, with a "GB" column provided as a convenience to the reader. Games behind is used less often inAmerican football, where ties are possible but relatively uncommon. Games behind is rarely used inice hockey andsoccer, where ties are or were traditionally common and standings points are typically used.
Major League Baseball (MLB) defines games behind as "the average of the differences between the leading team wins and the trailing team wins, and the leading teams losses and the trailing team losses."[26] A games behind column almost always appears in MLB standings for each five-team division.
In the1994 MLB season, theAmerican League andNational League each split into three divisions, and each added awild card team to the playoffs. Following this change, it became common for the media to publish an additional set of standings for the wild card race. It included all teams from a league, with the exception of the division leaders, and games behind was calculated with respect to the team with the highest standing in the wild card race.
In the2012 MLB season, both leagues added a second wild card team, and a third wild card team was added for each league starting with the2022 MLB season. Games behind in the wild card race is now calculated with respect to the final wild card position. MLB's website distinguishes this statistic aswild card games behind, abbreviated WCGB.[27] Unless all wild card qualifying teams are tied, this results in some teams being shown as some number of "games ahead" of the final qualifier, indicated by a plus sign ("+") in the standings. For example, see the2012 NL Wild Card standings, which shows theAtlanta Braves six games ahead of theSt. Louis Cardinals, and the2022 AL Wild Card standings, which shows theToronto Blue Jays andSeattle Mariners six games and four games, respectively, ahead of theTampa Bay Rays.
National Basketball Association (NBA) standings typically report games behind within each five-team division. However, it is not as closely followed as in baseball, because more teams qualify for the NBA playoffs, and the divisional statistics are not as important for playoff qualification. Sometimes, especially nearing the end of the regular season, games behind will be given with respect to the sixth through tenth positions in theEastern Conference andWestern Conference, due to the significance of the seeds in relation with the NBA’splay-in tournament.

National Football League (NFL) standings sometimes report games behind, although the statistic is not emphasized; winning percentage is used, computed from each team's win–loss–tie record. This is especially true since the introduction of the bye week in1990, exacerbating differences in the number of games that teams have played at various points in time, in addition to the possibility oftied games, which while highly uncommon since the introduction of overtime in the regular season starting in 1974 do still occur on occasion. Games behind is omitted from standings on the NFL's website[28] and is absent from most published standings.
The games behind statistic is eschewed in sports where tie games are traditionally common, such asice hockey andsoccer. Leagues in these sports typically rank teams by awarding a certain number of points for each win or tie. In competitions where ties have been abolished (especially in hockey), points are still awarded for an "overtime loss" such that they are often (but not always) the same value as ties previously were, while in soccer the traditional value of two points for a win has been replaced by three points, while ties are still worth one point. These changes would make calculating a "games behind" statistic even more complicated compared to if it were to be used under the traditional system in which a tie was effectively worth a "half-win."
TheCanadian Football League (CFL) also does not use games behind, and awards standings points.[29] However, unlike leagues such as theNational Hockey League (NHL), the CFL does not award points for overtime losses, although it experimented with such a system in the early 21st century. Also, unlike most other football codes that awardthree points for a win, the CFL still uses the traditional values of two points for a win and one for a tie. Therefore, a tie in the CFL is still effectively worth a "half-win" as it always has been inCanadian football (and also as it has been in the NFL since 1972).
Teams are sometimes referred to as being over or under "five hundred", in comparison to awinning percentage of.500 (percentage being a misnomer in the usual North American expression; .500 meaning 50% in this context). The calculation for this is simple subtraction. For example, a team at 29–19 is "10 games over five hundred",[30] as they could lose their next 10 games and still have a .500 record, while a team at 12–17 would be "five games under five hundred",[31] as the quickest they could reach .500 would be by winning their next five games. "Above" and "below" can be substituted for "over" and "under", respectively.
Game called for rain; the game was not suspended and resumed later because of its proximity to the end of the season and that it had no bearing on the standings.