TheShunzhi Emperor (15 March 1638 – 5 February 1661), also known by histemple nameEmperor Shizu of Qing, personal nameFulin, was the thirdemperor of theQing dynasty, and the first Qing emperor to rule overChina proper. Upon the death of his fatherHong Taiji, acommittee of Manchu princes chose the 5-year-old Fulin as successor. The princes also appointed two co-regents:Dorgon, the 14th son ofNurhaci, andJirgalang, one of Nurhaci's nephews, both of whom were members of theQing imperial clan. In November 1644, the Shunzhi Emperor was enthroned asemperor of China inBeijing.
From 1643 to 1650, political power lay mostly in the hands of theprince regent Dorgon. Under his leadership, the Qing conquered most of the territory of the fallenMing dynasty, chasedMing loyalist regimes deep into the southwestern provinces, and established the basis of Qing rule overChina proper despite highly unpopular policies such as the "hair cutting command" of 1645, which forced all Qing male subjects to shave their forehead and braid their remaining hair into aqueue resembling that of theManchus. After Dorgon's death on the last day of 1650, the young Shunzhi Emperor started to rule personally. He tried, with mixed success, to fight corruption and to reduce the political influence of the Manchu nobility. In the 1650s, he faced a resurgence of Ming loyalist resistance, but by 1661 his armies had defeated the Qing's last enemies,Koxinga and thePrince of Gui, both of whom would succumb the following year.
The Shunzhi Emperor died at the age of 22 ofsmallpox, a highlycontagious disease that wasendemic in China, but against which the Manchus had noimmunity. He was succeeded by his third son who assumed the throne as theKangxi Emperor and went on to reign for sixty years. Because fewer documents have survived from the Shunzhi era than from later eras of the Qing dynasty, this era is a relatively little-known period of Qing history.
In the 1580s, when China was ruled by theMing dynasty (1368–1644), a number ofJurchen tribes lived inManchuria.[2] In a series of campaigns from the 1580s to the 1610s,Nurhaci (1559–1626), the leader of theJianzhou Jurchens, unified most Jurchen tribes under his rule.[3] One of his most important reforms was to integrate Jurchen clans under flags of four different colors—yellow, white, red, and blue—each further subdivided into two to form an encompassing social and military system known as theEight Banners.[4] Nurhaci gave control of these Banners to his sons and grandsons.[5] Around 1612, Nurhaci renamed his clanAisin Gioro ("golden Gioro" in theManchu language), both to distinguish his family from other Gioro lines and to allude to an earlier dynasty that had been founded by Jurchens, theJin ("golden") dynasty that had ruled northern China from 1115 to 1234.[6] In 1616 Nurhaci formally announced the foundation of the"Later Jin" dynasty, effectively declaring his independence from the Ming.[7] Over the next few years he wrested most major cities in Liaodong from Ming control.[8] His string of victories ended in February 1626 at thesiege of Ningyuan, where Ming commanderYuan Chonghuan defeated him with the help of recently acquired Portuguesecannon.[9] Probably wounded during the battle, Nurhaci died a few months later.[10]
Nurhaci's son and successorHong Taiji (1592–1643) continued his father's state-building efforts: he concentrated power into his own hands, modeled the Later Jin's government institutions on Chinese ones, and integrated Mongol allies and surrendered Chinese troops into theEight Banners.[11] In 1629 he led an incursion to the outskirts of Beijing, during which he captured Chinese craftsmen who knew how to cast Portuguese cannon.[12] In 1635 Hong Taiji renamed the Jurchens the "Manchus", and in 1636 changed the name of his polity from "Later Jin" to "Qing".[13] Aftercapturing the last remaining Ming cities in Liaodong, by 1643 the Qing were preparing to attack the struggling Ming dynasty, which was crumbling under the combined weight of financial bankruptcy, devastating epidemics, and large-scale bandit uprisings fed by widespread starvation.[14]
When Hong Taiji died on 21 September 1643 without having named a successor, the fledgling Qing state faced a possibly serious crisis.[15] Several contenders—namely Nurhaci's second and eldest surviving sonDaišan, Nurhaci's fourteenth and fifteenth sonsDorgon andDodo (both born to the same mother), and Hong Taiji's eldest sonHooge—started to vie for the throne.[16] With his brothers Dodo andAjige, Dorgon (31 years old) controlled the Plain and Bordered WhiteBanners, Daišan (60) was in charge of the two Red Banners, whereas Hooge (34) had the loyalty of his father's two Yellow Banners.[17]
The decision about who would become the new Qing emperor fell to theDeliberative Council of Princes and Ministers, which was the Manchus' main policymaking body until the emergence of theGrand Council in the 1720s.[18] Many Manchu princes argued that Dorgon, a proven military leader, should become the new emperor, but Dorgon refused and insisted that one of Hong Taiji's sons should succeed his father.[19] To recognize Dorgon's authority while keeping the throne in Hong Taiji's descent line, the members of the council named Hong Taiji's ninth son, Fulin, as the new emperor, but decided that Dorgon andJirgalang (a nephew of Nurhaci who controlled the Bordered Blue Banner) would act as the five-year-old child'sregents.[19] Fulin was officially crownedemperor of the Qing dynasty on 8 October 1643; it was decided that he would reign under theera name "Shunzhi."[20] Because the Shunzhi reign is not well documented, it constitutes a relatively little-known period of Qing history.[21]
Prince RegentDorgon in imperial regalia. He reigned as a quasi emperor from 1643 to his death in 1650, a period during which the Qingconquered almost all of China.
On 17 February 1644, Jirgalang, who was a capable military leader but looked uninterested in managing state affairs, willingly yielded control of all official matters to Dorgon.[22] After an alleged plot by Hooge to undermine the regency was exposed on 6 May of that year, Hooge was stripped of his title of Imperial Prince and his co-conspirators were executed.[23] Dorgon soon replaced Hooge's supporters (mostly from the Yellow Banners) with his own, thus gaining closer control of two more Banners.[24] By early June 1644, he was in firm control of the Qing government and its military.[25]
In early 1644, just as Dorgon and his advisors were pondering how to attack theMing, peasant rebellions were dangerously approachingBeijing. On 24 April of that year, rebel leaderLi Zicheng breached the walls of the Ming capital, pushing theChongzhen Emperor to hang himself on a hill behind theForbidden City.[26] Hearing the news, Dorgon's Chinese advisorsHong Chengchou andFan Wencheng (范文程; 1597–1666) urged the Manchu prince to seize this opportunity to present themselves as avengers of the fallen Ming and to claim theMandate of Heaven for the Qing.[27] The last obstacle between Dorgon and Beijing was Ming generalWu Sangui, who was garrisoned atShanhai Pass at the eastern end of theGreat Wall.[28] Himself caught between the Manchus and Li Zicheng's forces, Wu requested Dorgon's help in ousting the bandits and restoring the Ming.[29] When Dorgon asked Wu to work for the Qing instead, Wu had little choice but to accept.[30] Aided by Wu Sangui's elite soldiers, who fought the rebel army for hours before Dorgon finally chose to intervene with his cavalry, the Qing won a decisive victory against Li Zicheng at theBattle of Shanhai Pass on 27 May.[31] Li's defeated troops looted Beijing for several days until Li left the capital on 4 June with all the wealth he could carry.[32]
The circular mound of theAltar of Heaven, where the Shunzhi Emperor conducted sacrifices on 30 October 1644, ten days before being officially proclaimedEmperor of China. The ceremony marked the moment when the Qing dynasty seized theMandate of Heaven.
After six weeks of mistreatment at the hands of rebel troops, the Beijing population sent a party of elders and officials to greet their liberators on 5 June.[33] They were startled when, instead of meeting Wu Sangui and the Ming heir apparent, they saw Dorgon, a horseriding Manchu with his shaved forehead, present himself as the Prince Regent.[34] In the midst of this upheaval, Dorgon installed himself in the Wuying Palace (武英殿), the only building that remained more or less intact after Li Zicheng had set fire to the palace complex on 3 June.[35] Banner troops were ordered not to loot; their discipline made the transition to Qing rule "remarkably smooth."[36] Yet at the same time as he claimed to have come to avenge the Ming, Dorgon ordered that all claimants to the Ming throne (including descendants of the last Ming emperor) should be executed along with their supporters.[37]
On 7 June, just two days after entering the city, Dorgon issued special proclamations to officials around the capital, assuring them that if the local population accepted to shave their forehead, wear a queue, and surrender, the officials would be allowed to stay at their post.[38] He had to repeal this command three weeks later after several peasant rebellions erupted around Beijing, threatening Qing control over the capital region.[39]
Dorgon greeted the Shunzhi Emperor at the gates of Beijing on 19 October 1644.[40] On 30 October the six-year-old monarch performed sacrifices to Heaven and Earth at theAltar of Heaven.[41] The southern cadet branch ofConfucius' descendants who held the titleWujing boshi五經博士 and the sixty-fifth generation descendant of Confucius to hold the titleDuke Yansheng in the northern branch both had their titles reconfirmed on 31 October.[41] A formal ritual of enthronement for Fulin was held on 8 November, during which the young emperor compared Dorgon's achievements to those of theDuke of Zhou, a revered regent from antiquity.[42] During the ceremony, Dorgon's official title was raised from "Prince Regent" to "Uncle Prince Regent" (Shufu shezheng wang 叔父攝政王), in which the Manchu term for "Uncle" (ecike) represented a rank higher than that of imperial prince.[43] Three days later Dorgon's co-regent Jirgalang was demoted from "Prince Regent" to "Assistant Uncle Prince Regent" (Fu zheng shuwang 輔政叔王).[44] In June 1645, Dorgon eventually decreed that all official documents should refer to him as "Imperial Uncle Prince Regent" (Huang shufu shezheng wang 皇叔父攝政王), which left him one step short of claiming the throne for himself.[44]
Examination cells in Beijing. In order to enhance their legitimacy among the Chinese elite, the Qing reestablished theimperial civil service examinations almost as soon as they seized Beijing in 1644.
One of Dorgon's first orders in the new Qing capital was to vacate the entire northern part of Beijing to give it toBannermen, including Han Chinese Bannermen.[45] The Yellow Banners were given the place of honor north of the palace, followed by the White Banners east, the Red Banners west, and the Blue Banners south.[46] This distribution accorded with the order established in the Manchu homeland before the conquest and under which "each of the banners was given a fixed geographical location according to the points of the compass."[47] Despite tax remissions and large-scale building programs designed to facilitate the transition, in 1648 many Chinese civilians still lived among the newly arrived Banner population and there was still animosity between the two groups.[48] Agricultural land outside the capital was also marked off (quan 圈) and given to Qing troops.[49] Former landowners now became tenants who had to pay rent to their absentee Bannermen landlords.[49] This transition in land use caused "several decades of disruption and hardship."[49]
In 1646, Dorgon also ordered that thecivil examinations for selecting government officials be reestablished. From then on they were held regularly every three years as under the Ming. In the very first palace examination held under Qing rule in 1646, candidates, most of whom were northern Chinese, were asked how the Manchus andHan Chinese could be made to work together for a common purpose.[50] The 1649 examination inquired about "how Manchus and Han Chinese could be unified so that their hearts were the same and they worked together without division."[51] Under the Shunzhi Emperor's reign, the average number of graduates per session of the metropolitan examination was the highest of the Qing dynasty ("to win more Chinese support"), until 1660 when lower quotas were established.[52]
To promote ethnic harmony, in 1648 an imperial decree formulated by Dorgon allowed Han Chinese civilians to marry women from the Manchu Banners, with the permission of the Board of Revenue if they were registered daughters of officials or commoners, or the permission of their banner company captain if they were unregistered commoners. Only later in the dynasty were these policies allowing intermarriage rescinded.[45][53][54]
A late-Qing woodblock print representing theYangzhou massacre of May 1645. Dorgon's brotherDodo ordered this massacre to scare other southern Chinese cities into submission. By the late nineteenth century the massacre was used by anti-Qing revolutionaries to arouseanti-Manchu sentiment among the Han Chinese population.[55]
Under the reign of Dorgon—whom historians have variously called "the mastermind of the Qing conquest" and "the principal architect of the great Manchu enterprise"—the Qing subdued almost all of China and pushed loyalist "Southern Ming" resistance into the far southwestern reaches of China. After repressing anti-Qing revolts inHebei andShandong in the Summer and Fall of 1644, Dorgon sent armies to root out Li Zicheng from the important city ofXi'an (Shaanxi province), where Li had reestablished his headquarters after fleeing Beijing in early June 1644.[56] Under the pressure of Qing armies, Li was forced to leave Xi'an in February 1645, and he was killed—either by his own hand or by a peasant group that had organized for self-defense in this time of rampant banditry—in September 1645 after fleeing though several provinces.[57]
From newly captured Xi'an, in early April 1645 the Qing mounted a campaign against the rich commercial and agricultural region ofJiangnan south of the lowerYangtze River, where in June 1644a Ming imperial prince had established a regime loyal to the Ming.[a] Factional bickering and numerous defections prevented the Southern Ming from mounting an efficient resistance.[b] Several Qing armies swept south, taking the key city ofXuzhou north of theHuai River in early May 1645 and soon converging onYangzhou, the main city on the Southern Ming's northern line of defense.[62] Bravely defended byShi Kefa, who refused to surrender, Yangzhou fell to Manchu artillery on 20 May after a one-week siege.[63] Dorgon's brotherPrince Dodo then ordered theslaughter of Yangzhou's entire population.[64] As intended, this massacre terrorized other Jiangnan cities into surrendering to the Qing.[65] Indeed, Nanjing surrendered without a fight on 16 June after its last defenders had made Dodo promise he would not hurt the population.[66] The Qing soon captured the Ming emperor (who died in Beijing the following year) and seized Jiangnan's main cities, includingSuzhou andHangzhou; by early July 1645, the frontier between the Qing and the Southern Ming had been pushed south to theQiantang River.[67]
A man inSan Francisco's Chinatown around 1900. The Chinese habit of wearing a queue came fromDorgon's July 1645 edict ordering all men to shave their forehead and tie their hair into a queue similar to those of theManchus.
On 21 July 1645, after Jiangnan had been superficially pacified, Dorgon issued a most inopportune edict ordering all Chinese men to shave their forehead and to braid the rest of their hair into aqueue identical to those of the Manchus.[68] The punishment for non-compliance was death.[69] This policy of symbolic submission helped the Manchus in telling friend from foe.[70] For Han officials and literati, however, the new hairstyle was shameful and demeaning (because it breached a commonConfucian directive to preserve one's body intact), whereas for common folk cutting their hair was the same as losing theirvirility.[71] Because it united Chinese of all social backgrounds into resistance against Qing rule, the hair cutting command greatly hindered the Qing conquest.[72] The defiant population ofJiading andSongjiang was massacred by former Ming generalLi Chengdong (李成東; d. 1649), respectively on 24 August and 22 September.[73]Jiangyin also held out against about 10,000 Qing troops for 83 days. When the city wall was finally breached on 9 October 1645, the Qing army led by Ming defectorLiu Liangzuo (劉良佐; d. 1667) massacred the entire population, killing between 74,000 and 100,000 people.[74] These massacres ended armed resistance against the Qing in the Lower Yangtze.[75] A few committed loyalists becamehermits, hoping that for lack of military success, their withdrawal from the world would at least symbolize their continued defiance against foreign rule.[75]
After the fall of Nanjing, two more members of the Ming imperial household created new Southern Ming regimes: one centered in coastalFujian around the "Longwu Emperor" Zhu Yujian, Prince of Tang—a ninth-generation descendant of Ming founderZhu Yuanzhang—and one inZhejiang around "Regent"Zhu Yihai, Prince of Lu.[76] But the two loyalist groups failed to cooperate, making their chances of success even lower than they already were.[77] In July 1646, a new Southern Campaign led byPrince Bolo sent Prince Lu's Zhejiang court into disarray and proceeded to attack the Longwu regime in Fujian.[78] Zhu Yujian was caught and summarily executed inTingzhou (western Fujian) on 6 October.[79] His adoptive sonKoxinga fled to theisland of Taiwan with his fleet.[79] Finally in November, the remaining centers of Ming resistance in Jiangxi province fell to the Qing.[80]
In late 1646 two more Southern Ming monarchs emerged in the southern province ofGuangzhou, reigning under theera names of Shaowu (紹武) andYongli.[80] Short of official costumes, the Shaowu court had to purchase robes from local theater troops.[80] The two Ming regimes fought each other until 20 January 1647, when a small Qing force led by Li Chengdong captured Guangzhou, killed the Shaowu Emperor, and sent the Yongli court fleeing toNanning inGuangxi.[81] In May 1648, however, Li mutinied against the Qing, and the concurrent rebellion of another former Ming general in Jiangxi helped Yongli to retake most of south China.[82] This resurgence of loyalist hopes was short-lived. New Qing armies managed to reconquer the central provinces of Huguang (present-dayHubei andHunan), Jiangxi, and Guangdong in 1649 and 1650.[83] The Yongli emperor had to flee again.[83] Finally on 24 November 1650, Qing forces led byShang Kexi captured Guangzhou and massacred the city's population, killing as many as 70,000 people.[84]
Meanwhile, in October 1646, Qing armies led byHooge (the son of Hong Taiji who had lost the succession struggle of 1643) reached Sichuan, where their mission was to destroy the kingdom of bandit leaderZhang Xianzhong.[85] Zhang was killed in a battle against Qing forces nearXichong in central Sichuan on 1 February 1647.[86] Also late in 1646 but further north, forces assembled by aMuslim leader known in Chinese sources as Milayin (米喇印) revolted against Qing rule inGanzhou (Gansu). He was soon joined by another Muslim named Ding Guodong (丁國棟).[87] Proclaiming that they wanted to restore the Ming, they occupied a number of towns in Gansu, including the provincial capitalLanzhou.[87] These rebels' willingness to collaborate with non-Muslim Chinese suggests that they were not only driven by religion.[87] Both Milayin and Ding Guodong were captured and killed byMeng Qiaofang (孟喬芳; 1595–1654) in 1648, and by 1650 the Muslim rebels had been crushed in campaigns that inflicted heavy casualties.[88]
Dorgon's unexpected death on 31 December 1650 during ahunting trip triggered a period of fierce factional struggles and opened the way for deep political reforms.[89] Because Dorgon's supporters were still influential at court, Dorgon was given an imperial funeral and was posthumously elevated to imperial status as the "Righteous Emperor" (yi huangdi 義皇帝).[90] On the same day of mid-January 1651, however, several officers of the White Banners led by former Dorgon supporter Ubai arrested Dorgon's brotherAjige for fear he would proclaim himself as the new regent; Ubai and his officers then named themselves presidents of several Ministries and prepared to take charge of the government.[91]
Meanwhile,Jirgalang, who had been stripped of his title of regent in 1647, gathered support among Banner officers who had been disgruntled during Dorgon's rule.[92] In order to consolidate support for the emperor in the two Yellow Banners (which had belonged to the Qing monarch since Hong Taiji) and to gain followers in Dorgon's Plain White Banner, Jirgalang named them the "Upper Three Banners" (shang san qi 上三旗; Manchu:dergi ilan gūsa), which from then on were owned and controlled by the emperor.[93]Oboi andSuksaha, who would become regents for theKangxi Emperor in 1661, were among the Banner officers who gave Jirgalang their support, and Jirgalang appointed them to theCouncil of Deliberative Princes to reward them.[92]
On 1 February, Jirgalang announced that the Shunzhi Emperor, who was about to turn thirteen, would now assume full imperial authority.[92] The regency was thus officially abolished. Jirgalang then moved to the attack. In late February or early March 1651 he accused Dorgon of usurping imperial prerogatives: Dorgon was found guilty and all his posthumous honors were removed.[92] Jirgalang continued to purge former members of Dorgon's clique and to bestow high ranks and nobility titles upon a growing number of followers in the Three Imperial Banners, so that by 1652 all of Dorgon's former supporters had been either killed or effectively removed from government.[94]
Factional politics and the fight against corruption
Court dress was a controversial topic during the Shunzhi era. High officialChen Mingxia was denounced in 1654 because he advocated returning toMing-dynasty court dress, an example of which is shown in this 17th-century portrait ofNi Yuanlu.
On 7 April 1651, barely two months after he seized the reins of government, the Shunzhi Emperor issued an edict announcing that he would purge corruption from officialdom.[95] This edict triggered factional conflicts among literati that would frustrate him until his death.[96] One of his first gestures was to dismiss grand academicianFeng Quan (馮銓; 1595–1672), a northern Chinese who had been impeached in 1645 but was allowed to remain in his post by Prince Regent Dorgon.[97] The Shunzhi Emperor replaced Feng withChen Mingxia (ca. 1601–1654), an influential southern Chinese with good connections in Jiangnan literary societies.[98] Though later in 1651 Chen was also dismissed on charges of influence peddling, he was reinstated in his post in 1653 and soon became a close personal advisor to the sovereign.[99] He was even allowed to draft imperial edicts just as MingGrand Secretaries used to.[100] Still in 1653, the Shunzhi Emperor decided to recall the disgraced Feng Quan, but instead of balancing the influence of northern and southern Chinese officials at court as the emperor had intended, Feng Quan's return only intensified factional strife.[101] In several controversies at court in 1653 and 1654, the southerners formed one bloc opposed to the northerners and the Manchus.[102] In April 1654, when Chen Mingxia spoke to northern officialNing Wanwo (寧完我; d. 1665) about restoring the style of dress of the Ming court, Ning immediately denounced Chen to the emperor and accused him of various crimes including bribe-taking,nepotism, factionalism, and usurping imperial prerogatives.[103] Chen was executed by strangulation on 27 April 1654.[104]
In November 1657, a major cheating scandal erupted during the Shuntian provincial-levelexaminations in Beijing.[105] Eight candidates from Jiangnan who were also relatives of Beijing officials had bribed examiners in the hope of being ranked higher in the contest.[106] Seven examination supervisors found guilty of receiving bribes were executed, and several hundred people were sentenced to punishments ranging from demotion to exile and confiscation of property.[107] The scandal, which soon spread to Nanjing examination circles, uncovered the corruption and influence-peddling that was rife in the bureaucracy, and that many moralistic officials from the north attributed to the existence of southern literary clubs and to the decline of classical scholarship.[108]
During his short reign, the Shunzhi Emperor encouraged Han Chinese to participate in government activities and revived many Chinese-style institutions that had been either abolished or marginalized during Dorgon's regency. He discussed history,classics, and politics with grand academicians such as Chen Mingxia (see previous section) and surrounded himself with new men such asWang Xi (王熙; 1628–1703), a young northern Chinese who was fluent in Manchu.[109] The "Six Edicts" (Liu yu 六諭) that the Shunzhi Emperor promulgated in 1652 were the predecessors to the Kangxi Emperor's "Sacred Edicts" (1670): "bare bones ofConfucian orthodoxy" that instructed the population to behave in afilial and law-abiding fashion.[110] In another move toward Chinese-style government, the sovereign reestablished theHanlin Academy and theGrand Secretariat in 1658. These two institutions based on Ming models further eroded the power of the Manchu elite and threatened to revive the extremes of literati politics that had plagued the late Ming, when factions coalesced around rival grand secretaries.[111]
To counteract the power of theImperial Household Department and the Manchu nobility, in July 1653 the Shunzhi Emperor established the Thirteen Offices (十三衙門), or Thirteen Eunuch Bureaus, which were supervised by Manchus, but manned by Chineseeunuchs rather than Manchubondservants.[112] Eunuchs had been kept under tight control during Dorgon's regency, but the young emperor used them to counter the influence of other power centers such as his motherthe Empress Dowager and former regent Jirgalang.[113] By the late 1650s eunuch power became formidable again: they handled key financial and political matters, offered advice on official appointments, and even composed edicts.[114] Because eunuchs isolated the monarch from the bureaucracy, Manchu and Chinese officials feared a return to the abuses of eunuch power that had plagued the late Ming.[115] Despite the emperor's attempt to impose strictures on eunuch activities, the Shunzhi Emperor's favorite eunuchWu Liangfu (吳良輔; d. 1661), who had helped him defeat the Dorgon faction in the early 1650s, was caught in a corruption scandal in 1658.[116] The fact that Wu only received a reprimand for his accepting bribes did not reassure the Manchu elite, which saw eunuch power as a degradation of Manchu power.[117] The Thirteen Offices would be eliminated (and Wu Liangfu executed) by Oboi and the otherregents of the Kangxi Emperor in March 1661 soon after the Shunzhi Emperor's death.[118]
"Moghul embassy" (emissaries from aMughal prince who ruledTurfan inCentral Asia) as portrayed in 1656 by Dutch visitors to the Shunzhi Emperor's Beijing.[119]
In 1646, when Qing armies led byBolo had entered the city of Fuzhou, they had found envoys from theRyūkyū Kingdom,Annam, and the Spanish inManila.[120] Thesetributary embassies that had come to see the now fallenLongwu Emperor of the Southern Ming were forwarded to Beijing, and eventually sent home with instructions about submitting to the Qing.[120] The King of the Ryūkyū Islands sent his first tribute mission to the Qing in 1649, Siam in 1652, and Annam in 1661, after the last remnants of Ming resistance had been removed fromYunnan, which bordered Annam.[120]
Also in 1646 sultanAbu al-Muhammad Haiji Khan, aMoghul prince who ruledTurfan, had sent an embassy requesting the resumption of trade with China, which had been interrupted by the fall of the Ming dynasty.[121] The mission was sent without solicitation, but the Qing agreed to receive it, allowing it to conducttribute trade in Beijing andLanzhou (Gansu).[122] But this agreement was interrupted by a Muslim rebellion that engulfed the northwest in 1646 (see the last paragraph of the "Conquest of China" section above). Tribute and trade withHami and Turfan, which had aided the rebels, were eventually resumed in 1656.[123] In 1655, however, the Qing court announced that tributary missions from Turfan would be accepted only once every five years.[124]
The bell-shaped White Dagoba, which can still be seen inBeihai Park in Beijing, was commissioned by the Shunzhi Emperor to honorTibetan Buddhism.
In 1651 the young emperor invited to Beijing theFifth Dalai Lama, the leader of theYellow Hat Sect ofTibetan Buddhism, who, with the military help ofKhoshot MongolGushri Khan, had recently unified religious and secular rule inTibet.[125] Qing emperors had been patrons of Tibetan Buddhism since at least 1621 under the reign ofNurhaci, but there were also political reasons behind the invitation.[126] Namely, Tibet was becoming a powerful polity west of the Qing, and the Dalai Lama held influence over Mongol tribes, many of which had not submitted to the Qing.[127] To prepare for the arrival of this "living Buddha," the Shunzhi Emperor ordered the building of the WhiteDagoba (baita 白塔) on an island on one of the imperial lakes northwest of the Forbidden City, at the former site ofQubilai Khan's palace.[128] After more invitations and diplomatic exchanges to decide where the Tibetan leader would meet the Qing emperor, the Dalai Lama arrived in Beijing in January 1653.[c] The Dalai Lama later had a scene of this visit carved in thePotala Palace inLhasa, which he had started building in 1645.[129]
Meanwhile, north of the Manchu homeland, adventurersVassili Poyarkov (1643–46) andYerofei Khabarov (1649–53) had started to explore theAmur River valley forTzarist Russia. In 1653 Khabarov was recalled toMoscow and replaced byOnufriy Stepanov, who assumed command of Khabarov'sCossack troops.[130] Stepanov went south into theSungari River, along which he exacted "yasak" (fur tribute) from native populations such as theDaur and theDuchers, but these groups resisted because they were already paying tribute to the Shunzhi Emperor ("Shamshakan" in Russian sources).[131] In 1654 Stepanov defeated a small Manchu force that had been despatched fromNingguta to investigate Russian advances.[130] In 1655 another Qing commander, the Mongol Minggadari (d. 1669), defeated Stepanov's forces at fortKumarsk on the Amur, but this was not enough to chase the Russians.[132] In 1658, however, Manchu generalŠarhūda (1599–1659) attacked Stepanov with a fleet of 40 or more ships that managed to kill or capture most Russians.[130] This Qing victory temporarily cleared the Amur valley of Cossack bands, butSino-Russian border conflicts would continue until 1689, when the signature of theTreaty of Nerchinsk fixed the borders between Russia and the Qing.[130]
Though the Qing under Dorgon's leadership had successfully pushed the Southern Ming deep into southern China, Ming loyalism was not dead yet. In early August 1652,Li Dingguo, who had served as general in Sichuan under bandit kingZhang Xianzhong (d. 1647) and was now protecting theYongli Emperor of the Southern Ming, retookGuilin (Guangxi province) from the Qing.[133] Within a month, most of the commanders who had been supporting the Qing in Guangxi reverted to the Ming side.[134] Despite occasionally successful military campaigns inHuguang andGuangdong in the next two years, Li failed to retake important cities.[133] In 1653, the Qing court putHong Chengchou in charge of retaking the southwest.[135] Headquartered inChangsha (in what is now Hunan province), he patiently built up his forces; only in late 1658 did well-fed and well-supplied Qing troops mount a multipronged campaign to take Guizhou and Yunnan.[135] In late January 1659, a Qing army led by Manchu prince Doni took the capital of Yunnan, sending the Yongli Emperor fleeing into nearbyBurma, which was then ruled by KingPindale Min of theToungoo dynasty.[135] The last sovereign of the Southern Ming stayed there until 1662, when he was captured and executed by Wu Sangui, the former Ming general whose surrender to the Manchus in April 1644 had allowed Dorgon to start theQing conquest of China.[136]
Zheng Chenggong ("Koxinga"), who had been adopted by the Longwu Emperor in 1646 and ennobled by Yongli in 1655, also continued to defend the cause of the Southern Ming.[137] In 1659, just as the Shunzhi Emperor was preparing to hold a special examination to celebrate the glories of his reign and the success of the southwestern campaigns, Zheng sailed up the Yangtze River with a well-armed fleet, took several cities from Qing hands, and went so far as to threatenNanjing.[138] When the emperor heard of this sudden attack he is said to have slashed his throne with a sword in anger.[138] But the siege of Nanjing was relieved and Zheng Chenggong repelled, forcing Zheng to take refuge in the southeastern coastal province of Fujian.[139] Pressured by Qing fleets, Zheng fled to Taiwan in April 1661 but died that same summer.[140] His descendants resisted Qing rule until 1683, when the Kangxi Emperor successfully took the island.[141]
After Fulin came to rule on his own in 1651, his mother theEmpress Dowager Zhaosheng arranged for him to marry her niece, but the young monarchdeposed his new Empress in 1653.[142] The following year Xiaozhuang arranged another imperial marriage with herKhorchin Mongol clan, this time matching her son with her own grand-niece.[142] Though Fulin also disliked his second empress (known posthumously asEmpress Xiaohuizhang), he was not allowed to demote her. She never bore him children.[143] Starting in 1656, the Shunzhi Emperor lavished his affection onConsort Donggo, who, according toJesuit accounts from the time, had first been the wife of another Manchu noble.[144] She gave birth to a son (the Shunzhi Emperor's fourth) in November 1657. The emperor would have made him his heir apparent, but he died early in 1658 before he was given a name.[145]
The Shunzhi Emperor was an open-minded emperor and relied on the advice ofJohann Adam Schall von Bell, aJesuit missionary fromCologne in the Germanic parts of theHoly Roman Empire, for guidance on matters ranging fromastronomy and technology to religion and government.[146] In late 1644, Dorgon had put Schall in charge of preparing a new calendar because hiseclipse predictions had proven more reliable than those of theofficial astronomer.[147] After Dorgon's death Schall developed a personal relationship with the young emperor, who called him "grandfather" (mafa in Manchu).[148] At the height of his influence in 1656 and 1657, Schall reports that the Shunzhi Emperor often visited his house and talked to him late into the night.[146] He was excused fromprostrating himself in the presence of the emperor, was granted land to build a church in Beijing, and was even given imperial permission to adopt a son (because Fulin worried that Schall did not have an heir), but the Jesuits' hope of converting the Qing sovereign to Christianity was crushed when the Shunzhi Emperor became a devout follower ofChan Buddhism in 1657.[149]
The emperor developed a good command of Chinese that allowed him to manage matters of state and to appreciate Chinese arts such as calligraphy and drama.[150] One of his favorite texts was "Rhapsody of a Myriad Sorrows" (Wan chou qu 萬愁曲), byGui Zhuang (歸莊; 1613–1673), who was a close friend of anti-Qing intellectualsGu Yanwu andWan Shouqi (萬壽祺; 1603–1652).[151] "Quite passionate and attach[ing] great importance toqing (love)," he could also recite by heart long passages of the popularRomance of the Western Chamber.[150]
Electron micrograph of thesmallpox virus, which theManchus had noimmunity against. The Shunzhi Emperor died of it, and his young successor,Xuanye, was chosen because he had already survived it.
In September 1660,Consort Donggo, the Shunzhi Emperor's favourite consort, suddenly died as a result of grief over the loss of a child.[138] Overwhelmed with grief, the emperor fell into dejection for months, until he contractedsmallpox on 2 February 1661.[138] On 4 February 1661, officials Wang Xi (王熙, 1628–1703; the emperor'sconfidant) and Margi (a Manchu) were called to the emperor's bedside to record his last will.[152] On the same day, his seven-year-old third sonXuanye was chosen to be his successor, probably because he had already survived smallpox.[153] The emperor died on 5 February 1661 in the Forbidden City at the age of twenty-two.[138]
The Manchus feared smallpox more than any other disease because they had noimmunity to it and almost always died when they contracted it.[154] By 1622 at the latest, they had already established an agency to investigate smallpox cases and isolate sufferers to avoidcontagion.[155] During outbreaks, royal family members were routinely sent to "smallpox avoidance centers" (bidousuo 避痘所) to protect themselves from infection.[156] The Shunzhi Emperor was particularly fearful of the disease, because he was young and lived in a large city, near sources of contagion.[156] Indeed, during his reign at least nine outbreaks of smallpox were recorded in Beijing, each time forcing the emperor to move to a protected area such as the "Southern Park" (Nanyuan 南苑), a hunting ground south of Beijing where Dorgon had built a "smallpox avoidance center" in the 1640s.[157] Despite this and other precautions—such as rules forcing Chinese residents to move out of the city when they contracted smallpox—the young monarch still succumbed to that illness.[158]
An official court portrait ofOboi, who on 5 February 1661 was named as the main regent to the newly enthronedKangxi Emperor, who was only seven years old.
The emperor'slast will, which was made public on the evening of 5 February, appointed four regents for his young son:Oboi,Soni,Suksaha, andEbilun, who had all helped Jirgalang to purge the court of Dorgon's supporters after Dorgon's death on the last day of 1650.[159] It is difficult to determine whether the Shunzhi Emperor had really named these four Manchu nobles as regents, because they and Empress Dowager Zhaosheng clearly tampered with the emperor'stestament before promulgating it.[d] The emperor's will expressed his regret about his Chinese-style ruling (his reliance on eunuchs and his favoritism toward Chinese officials), his neglect of Manchu nobles and traditions, and his headstrong devotion to his consort rather than to his mother.[160] Though the emperor had often issued self-deprecating edicts during his reign, the policies his will rejected had been central to his government since he had assumed personal rule in the early 1650s.[161] The will as it was formulated gave "the mantle of imperial authority" to the four regents, and served to support their pro-Manchu policies during the period known as theOboi regency, which lasted from 1661 to 1669.[162]
Because court statements did not clearly announce the cause of the emperor's death, rumors soon started to circulate that he had not died but in fact retired to aBuddhist monastery to live anonymously as amonk, either out of grief for the death of his beloved consort, or because of acoup by the Manchu nobles his will had named as regents.[163] These rumors seemed not so incredible because the emperor had become a fervent follower ofChanBuddhism in the late 1650s, even lettingmonks move into the imperial palace.[164] Modern Chinese historians have considered the Shunzhi Emperor's possible retirement as one of the three mysterious cases of the early Qing.[e] But much circumstantial evidence—including an account by one of these monks that the emperor's health greatly deteriorated in early February 1661 because of smallpox, and the fact that a concubine and an Imperial Bodyguard committed suicide to accompany the emperor in burial—suggests that the Shunzhi Emperor's death was not staged.[165]
After being kept in the Forbidden City for 27 days of mourning, on 3 March 1661 the emperor's corpse was transported in a lavish procession to Jingshan 景山 (a hillock just north of the Forbidden City), after which a large amount of precious goods were burned as funeral offerings.[166] Only two years later, in 1663, was the body transported to its final resting place.[167] Contrary to Manchu customs at the time, which usually dictated that a deceased person should be cremated, the Shunzhi Emperor was buried.[168] He was interred in what later came to be known as theEastern Qing Tombs, 125 kilometers (75 miles) northeast of Beijing, one of two Qing imperial cemeteries.[169] His tomb is part of the Xiao (孝)mausoleum complex (known inManchu as the Hiyoošungga Munggan), which was the first mausoleum to be erected on that site.[169]
TheKangxi Emperor's three "southern tours" in the Jiangnan region—1684, 1689 (here depicted), and 1699—asserted the prestige and confidence of the newly solidified Qing dynasty a few years after it defeated theThree Feudatories.[170]
The fake will in which the Shunzhi Emperor had supposedly expressed regret for abandoning Manchu traditions gave authority to thenativist policies of the Kangxi Emperor'sfour regents.[171] Citing the testament, Oboi and the other regents quickly abolished the Thirteen Eunuch Bureaus.[172] Over the next few years, they enhanced the power of theImperial Household Department, which was run by Manchus and theirbondservants, eliminated theHanlin Academy, and limited membership in theDeliberative Council of Princes and Ministers to Manchus and Mongols.[173] The regents also adopted aggressive policies toward the Qing's Chinese subjects: they executed dozens of people and punished thousands of others in the wealthy Jiangnan region forliterary dissent and tax arrears, and forced the coastal population of southeast China tomove inland in order to starve theTaiwan-basedKingdom of Tungning run by descendants ofKoxinga.[174]
After the Kangxi Emperor managed to imprison Oboi in 1669, he reverted many of the regents' policies.[175] He restored institutions his father had favored, including theGrand Secretariat, through which Chinese officials gained an important voice in government.[176] He also defeated the rebellion of theThree Feudatories, three Chinese military commanders who had played key military roles in theQing conquest, but had now become entrenched rulers of enormous domains in southern China.[177] The civil war (1673–1681) tested the loyalty of the new Qing subjects, but Qing armies eventually prevailed.[178] Once victory had become certain, a special examination for "eminent scholars of broad learning" (Boxue hongru 博學鴻儒) was held in 1679 to attract Chinese literati who had refused to serve the new dynasty.[179] The successful candidates were assigned to compile theofficial history of the fallen Ming dynasty.[177] The rebellion was defeated in 1681, the same year the Kangxi Emperor initiated the use ofvariolation to inoculate children of the imperial family against smallpox.[180] When the Kingdom of Tungning finally fell in 1683, the military consolidation of the Qing regime was complete.[177] The institutional foundation laid by Dorgon, and the Shunzhi and Kangxi emperors allowed the Qing to erect an imperial edifice of awesome proportion and to turn it into "one of the most successful imperial states the world has known."[181] Ironically, however, the prolongedPax Manchurica that followed the Kangxi consolidation made the Qing unprepared to face aggressive European powers with modern weaponry in the nineteenth century.[182]
The Shunzhi Emperor's third son, Xuanye, after he had become theKangxi Emperor (r. 1661–1722)
Although only nineteen imperial consorts are recorded for the Shunzhi Emperor in the Aisin-Gioro genealogy made by theImperial Clan Court, burial records show that he had at least thirty-two of them.[183] There were two empresses in his reign, both relatives of his mother.
He had a total of fourteen children,[184] but only four sons (Fuquan, Xuanye, Changning, and Longxi) and one daughter (Princess Gongque) lived to be old enough to marry. Unlike later Qing emperors, the names of the Shunzhi Emperor's sons did not include a generational character.[185]
Before the Qing court moved to Beijing in 1644, Manchu women used to have personal names, but after 1644 these names "disappear from the genealogical and archival records". Imperial consorts were usually known by their titles and the name of their patrilineal clan, while imperial daughters were given a title and rank by which they then became known only after their betrothal.[186] Although five of the Shunzhi Emperor's six daughters died in infancy or childhood, they all appear in the Aisin-Gioro genealogy.[186]
^Dorgon's brother Dodo received the command to lead this "southern expedition" (nan zheng 南征) on 1 April.[58] He set out from Xi'an on that very day.[59] The Ming Prince of Fu had beencrowned asemperor on 19 June 1644.[60][61]
^For examples of the factional struggles that weakened the Hongguang court, seeWakeman 1985, pp. 523–43. Some defections are explained inWakeman 1985, pp. 543–45.
^Western historians do not seem to agree on the date of the Dalai Lama's visit: seeWakeman 1985, p. 929, note 81 ("1651");Crossley 1999, p. 239 ("1651");Naquin 2000, pp. 311 and 473 ("1652");Benard 2004, p. 134, note 23 ("1652");Zarrow 2004b, p. 187, note 5 ("between 1652 and 1653");Rawski 1998, p. 252 ("1653");Berger 2003, p. 57. The QingVeritable Records (Shilu 實錄) cited on p. 476 ofLi 2003, however, clearly indicate that the Dalai Lama arrived in Beijing on 14 January 1653 (on the 15th day of the last month of the 9th year of Shunzhi) and left the capital sometime in the second month of the 10th year of Shunzhi (March 1653).
^Rawski 1998, p. 99 (about the White and Yellow banners);Dennerline 2002, p. 79 (table with age of the imperial princes and the banners they controlled).
^Dennerline 2002, p. 77 (convening of the Deliberative Council to discuss Hong Taiji's succession);Hucker 1985, p. 266 (Deliberative Council as "the most influential shaper of policy in the early Ch'ing" [i.e., Qing];Bartlett 1991, p. 1 (the Grand Council rose "to the overlordship of almost the entire central government of the Chinese empire" in the 1720s and 1730s).
^Wakeman 1985, pp. 420–22 (which explains these matters and claims that the order was repealed by edict on 25 June).Gong 2010, p. 84 gives the date as 28 June.
^Wakeman 1985, pp. 858 and 860 ("According to the emperor's speechwriter, who was probably Fan Wencheng, Dorgon even 'surpassed' (guo) the revered Duke of Zhou because 'The Uncle Prince also led the Grand Army through Shanhai Pass to smash two hundred thousand bandit soldiers, and then proceeded to take Yanjing, pacifying the Central Xia. He invited Us to come to the capital and received Us as a great guest'.").
^Man-Cheong 2004, p. 7, Table 1.1 (number of graduates per session under each Qing reign);Wakeman 1985, p. 954 (reason for the high quotas);Elman 2001, p. 169 (lower quotas in 1660).
^Struve 1988, p. 660 (capture of Suzhou and Hangzhou by early July 1645; new frontier);Wakeman 1985, p. 580 (capture of the emperor around 17 June, and later death in Beijing).
^Wakeman 1985, p. 647 ("From the Manchus' perspective, the command to cut one's hair or lose one's head not only brought rulers and subjects together into a single physical resemblance; it also provided them with a perfect loyalty test").
^Wakeman 1985, pp. 648–49 (officials and literati) and 650 (common men). In theClassic of Filial Piety,Confucius is cited to say that "a person's body and hair, being gifts from one's parents, are not to be damaged: this is the beginning of filial piety" (身體髮膚,受之父母,不敢毀傷,孝之始也). Prior to the Qing dynasty, adult Han Chinese men customarily did not cut their hair, but instead wore it in a topknot.
^Struve 1988, pp. 662–63 ("broke the momentum of the Qing conquest");Wakeman 1975, p. 56 ("the hair-cutting order, more than any other act, engendered the Kiangnan [Jiangnan] resistance of 1645");Wakeman 1985, p. 650 ("the rulers' effort to make Manchus and Han one unified 'body' initially had the effect of unifying upper- and lower-class natives in central and south China against the interlopers").
^Oxnam 1975, p. 47 ("intense factional rivalry," "among the fiercest and most complex of the early Ch'ing");Wakeman 1985, pp. 892–93 (date and cause of Dorgon's death) and 907 (second "great wave of Qing institutional reform" from 1652 to 1655).
^In 1951 Italian scholarLuciano Petech was the first to hypothesize that these emissaries came fromTurfan, not from the Moghul India (Petech 1951, pp. 124–27, cited inLach & van Kley 1994, plate 315).Kim 2008, p. 109 discusses this Turfan embassy in some detail.
^Rawski 1998, p. 250 (unification or religious and secular rule).
^Rawski 1998, p. 251 (beginning of Qing patronage of Tibetan Buddhism).
^Zarrow 2004b, p. 187, note 5 (political reasons for inviting the Dalai Lama).
^Wakeman 1985, p. 929, note 81 (site of Qionghua Island and Qubilai's former palace);Naquin 2000, p. 309 (preparation for Lama's visit, "bell-shaped" temple).
^Naquin 2000, p. 473;Chayet 2004, p. 40 (date of the beginning of the construction of the Potala).
^Spence 2002, p. 125. Note that Xuanye was born in May 1654, and was therefore less than seven years old. BothSpence 2002 andOxnam 1975 (p. 1) nonetheless claim that he was "seven years old."Dennerline 2002 (p. 119) andRawski 1998 (p. 99) indicate that he was "not yet seven years old." In Chinese documents concerning the succession, Xuanye was said to be eightsui (Oxnam 1975, p. 62).
^Perdue 2005, p. 47 ("Seventy to 80 percent of those infected died");Chang 2002, p. 196 (most feared disease among the Manchus).
^Naquin 2000, p. 311 (Southern Park used as hunting ground);Chang 2002, pp. 181 (number of outbreaks) & 192 (Dorgon building abidousuo in the Southern Park).
^Naquin 2000, p. 296 (on rule forcing Chinese residents to move out).
^Oxnam 1975, pp. 48 (on the four men helping Jirgalang), 50 (date of promulgation of the edict of succession), & 62 (on appointment of the four regents);Kessler 1976, p. 21 (on helping to get rid of Dorgon's faction in the early 1650s).
^Oxnam 1975, p. 51 (on proclamations in which the emperor "publicly degraded himself") and 52 (on the centrality of these policies to the Shunzhi Emperor's rule).
^Fang 1943a, p. 258 (emperor became a devout Buddhist in 1657);Dennerline 2002, p. 118 (emperor had become devoted to Buddhism "by 1659"; monks living in the palace).
^Oxnam 1975, p. 205 (for monk's diary, citing an older study by Chinese historianMeng Sen 孟森);Spence 2002, p. 125 (on the two suicides).
^Elliott 2001, p. 477, note 122 (citing several studies and primary documents). By contrast,Hong Taiji and the Shunzhi Emperor's two empresses had been cremated (Elliott 2001, p. 264).
Dennerline, Jerry (2002),"The Shun-chih Reign", in Peterson, Willard J. (ed.),Cambridge History of China, Vol. 9, Part 1: The Ch'ing Dynasty to 1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–119,ISBN0-521-24334-3.
Struve, Lynn (1988),"The Southern Ming", in Mote, Frederic W.; Twitchett, Denis; Fairbank, John King (eds.),Cambridge History of China, Volume 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368–1644, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 641–725,ISBN0-521-24332-7.
Bartlett, Beatrice S. (1991),Monarchs and Ministers: The Grand Council in Mid-Ch'ing China, 1723–1820, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press,ISBN0-520-08645-7.
Benard, Elisabeth (2004), "The Qianlong emperor and Tibetan Buddhism", in Millward, James A.; et al. (eds.),New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengde, London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, pp. 123–35,ISBN0-415-32006-2.
Berger, Patricia (2003),Empire of Emptiness: Buddhist Art and Political Authority in Qing China, Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press,ISBN0-8248-2563-2.
Chang, Chia-feng (2002), "Disease and its Impact on Politics, Diplomacy, and the Military: The Case of Smallpox and the Manchus (1613–1795)",Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences,57 (2):177–97,doi:10.1093/jhmas/57.2.177,PMID11995595.
Chang, Michael G. (2007),A Court on Horseback: Imperial Touring and the Construction of Qing Rule, 1680–1785, Cambridge (Mass.) and London: Harvard University Asia Center,ISBN978-0-674-02454-0.
Chayet, Anne (2004), "Architectural wonderland: an empire of fictions", in Millward, James A.; et al. (eds.),New Qing Imperial History: The making of Inner Asian empire at Qing Chengde, London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, pp. 33–52,ISBN0-415-32006-2.
Crossley, Pamela Kyle (1999),A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press,ISBN0-520-21566-4.
Elman, Benjamin A. (2001),A Cultural History of Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press,ISBN0-520-21509-5.
Elman, Benjamin A. (2002), "The Social Roles of Literati in Early to Mid-Ch'ing", in Peterson, Willard J. (ed.),Cambridge History of China, Vol. 9, Part 1: The Ch'ing Dynasty to 1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 360–427,ISBN0-521-24334-3.
Gong, Baoli 宫宝利 (2010),Shunzhi shidian顺治事典 ["Events of the Shunzhi reign"] (in Chinese), Beijing: Zijincheng chubanshe 紫禁城出版社 ["Forbidden City Press"],ISBN978-7-5134-0018-3.
Ho, Ping-ti (1962),The Ladder of Success in Imperial China: Aspects of Social Mobility, 1368–1911, New York: Columbia University Press,ISBN0-231-05161-1.
Kuhn, Philip A. (1990),Soulstealers: The Chinese Sorcery Scare of 1768, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press,ISBN0-674-82152-1.
Lach, Donald F.; van Kley, Edwin J. (1994),Asia in the Making of Europe, Volume III,A Century of Advance, Book Four,East Asia, Chicago: University of Chicago Press,ISBN978-0-226-46734-4.
Li, Wai-yee (2010), "Early Qing to 1723", inKang-i Sun Chang;Stephen Owen (eds.),The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature, Volume II: From 1375, Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–244,ISBN978-0-521-11677-0 (2-volume set).
Li, Zhiting 李治亭, ed. (2003),Qingchao tongshi: Shunzhi fenjuan 清朝通史: 順治分卷 [General History of the Qing Dynasty: Shunzhi Volume] (in Chinese), Beijing: Zijincheng chubanshe 紫禁城出版社 ["Fordidden City Press"],ISBN7-80047-380-5.
Mair, Victor H. (1985), "Language and Ideology in the Written Popularization of theSacred Edict", in Johnson, David; et al. (eds.),Popular Culture in Late Imperial China, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. 325–59,ISBN0-520-06172-1.
Man-Cheong, Iona D. (2004),The Class of 1761: Examinations, State, and Elites in Eighteenth-Century China, Stanford: Stanford University Press,ISBN0-8047-4146-8.
Petech, Luciano (1951), "La pretesa ambasciata di Shah Jahan alla Cina ["The alleged embassy of Shah Jahan to China"]",Rivista degli studi orientali ["Review of Oriental Studies"] (in Italian),XXVI:124–27.
(in Chinese)Qingshi gao 清史稿 ["Draft History of Qing"]. Edited by Zhao Erxun 趙爾巽 et al. Completed in 1927. Citing 1976–77 edition by Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, in 48 volumes with continuous pagination.
Roth Li, Gertraude (2002),"State Building Before 1644", in Peterson, Willard J. (ed.),Cambridge History of China, Vol. 9, Part 1:The Ch'ing Dynasty to 1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–72,ISBN0-521-24334-3.
Spence, Jonathan D. (2002),"The K'ang-hsi Reign", in Peterson, Willard J. (ed.),Cambridge History of China, Vol. 9, Part 1: The Ch'ing Dynasty to 1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 120–82,ISBN0-521-24334-3.
Standaert, Nicolas (2008),The Interweaving of Rituals: Funerals in the Cultural Exchange Between China and Europe, Seattle: University of Washington Press,ISBN978-0-295-98810-8.
Turayev, Vadim [Вадим Тураев] (1995), "О ХАРАКТЕРЕ КУПЮР В ПУБЛИКАЦИЯХ ДОКУМЕНТОВ РУССКИХ ЗЕМЛЕПРОХОДЦЕВ XVII ["Regarding omissions in the publication of documents by seventeenth-century Russian explorers"]", in A.R. Artemyev (ed.),Русские первопроходцы на Дальнем Востоке в XVII – XIX вв. (Историко-археологические исследования)["Russian pioneers in the Far East in the 17th–19th centuries: historical and archaeological research"], volume 2 (in Russian), Vladivostok: Rossiĭskaia akademiia nauk, Dalʹnevostochnoe otd-nie,ISBN5-7442-0402-4.
Wakeman, Frederic (1975), "Localism and Loyalism During the Ch'ing Conquest of Kiangnan: The Tragedy of Chiang-yin", in Wakeman, Frederic Jr.; Grant, Carolyn (eds.),Conflict and Control in Late Imperial China, Berkeley: Center of Chinese Studies, University of California, Berkeley, pp. 43–85,ISBN0-520-02597-0.
Wills, John E. (1984),Embassies and Illusions: Dutch and Portuguese Envoys to K'ang-hsi, 1666–1687, Cambridge (Mass.) and London: Harvard University Press,ISBN0-674-24776-0.
Wu, Silas H. L. (1979),Passage to Power: K'ang-hsi and His Heir Apparent, 1661–1722, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press,ISBN0-674-65625-3.
Zarrow, Peter (2004a), "Historical Trauma: Anti-Manchuism and Memories of Atrocity in Late Qing China",History and Memory,16 (2):67–107,doi:10.1353/ham.2004.0013,S2CID161270740.
Zarrow, Peter (2004b), "Qianlong's inscription on the founding of the Temple of the Happiness and Longevity of Mt Sumeru (Xumifushou miao)", in Millward, James A.; et al. (eds.),New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengde, translated by Zarrow, London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, pp. 185–87,ISBN0-415-32006-2.
Zhao, Gang (January 2006). "Reinventing China Imperial Qing Ideology and the Rise of Modern Chinese National Identity in the Early Twentieth Century".Modern China.32 (1). Sage Publications:3–30.doi:10.1177/0097700405282349.JSTOR20062627.S2CID144587815.
Zhou, Ruchang [周汝昌] (2009),Between Noble and Humble: Cao Xueqin and the Dream of the Red Chamber, edited by Ronald R. Gray and Mark S. Ferrara, translated by Liangmei Bao and Kyongsook Park, New York: Peter Lang,ISBN978-1-4331-0407-7.