| Discipline | Psychology |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Edited by | Axel Cleeremans |
| Publication details | |
| History | 2010–present |
| Publisher | Frontiers (Switzerland) |
| Yes | |
| License | Creative Commons Attribution |
| 3.8 (2022) | |
| Standard abbreviations ISO 4 (alt) · Bluebook (alt) NLM (alt) · MathSciNet (alt  ) | |
| ISO 4 | Front. Psychol. |
| Indexing CODEN (alt) · JSTOR (alt) · LCCN (alt) MIAR · NLM (alt) · Scopus · W&L | |
| ISSN | 1664-1078 |
| OCLC no. | 701805890 |
| Links | |
Frontiers in Psychology is apeer-reviewedopen-accessacademic journal covering all aspects ofpsychology. It was established in 2010 and is published byFrontiers Media, a controversial company that is included inJeffrey Beall's list of "potential, possible, or probablepredatory publishers".[1][2] Theeditor-in-chief isAxel Cleeremans (Université libre de Bruxelles).
The journal is abstracted and indexed inCurrent Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences,[3]EBSCO databases,PsycINFO,[4] andScopus.[5]
The journal has a 2022impact factor of 3.8.[6] Since 2016, the journal has a score of 2 in theNorwegian Scientific Index,[7] which "covers the most prestigious and rigorous channels".[8][9] However, this listing was revised in 2023 to the X list which marks publication channels where there is doubt as to whether they should be approved or not and which The National Board of Scholarly Publishing and The Norwegian Directorate for Higher Education and Skills wants feedback from the research community.[10]
In February 2013,Frontiers in Psychology published astudy byStephan Lewandowsky and co-authors which analysed theconspiracy theories offered by the climate blog readers who responded to his2012 paper about public opinion on climate change.[11] In March 2014, Frontiers retracted the study, indicating that while they "did not identify any issues with the academic and ethical aspects of the study" they believed that "the legal context is insufficiently clear".[12]DeSmogBlog said that the main legal concern was whether it was potentially defamatory for the paper to link climate change denialism to conspiracy theorists.[13] There were public concerns about the "chilling effect" of the decision on research.[13][14] On 4 April 2014, Frontiers said they retracted the 2013 Lewandowsky article because the authors did not sufficiently protect the rights of people analyzed and named in the article: "Specifically, the article categorizes the behaviour of identifiable individuals within the context of psychopathological characteristics."[15] AnArs Technica article discussed the controversy, including "apparent contradictions" between Frontiers' March 2014 retraction and their April 2014 statement.[16]
Due in part to this incident, Frontiers Media was included inJeffrey Beall's list of "potential, possible, or probable predatory publishers" before Beall decided to shut down his website,[2][17] though both theCommittee on Publication Ethics and theOpen Access Scholarly Publishing Association have stated that they have no concerns with Frontiers' membership of their organizations.[18][19]
